<< throws away the IBM technical manual >>
Umm... I'm thinking it has something to do with the Continental Congress?
Washington was first President under the Constitution of the United States. Prior to that, the law of the land in the US was the Articles of Confederation which called for a President of the United States elected by the Continental Congress (more of a parliamentary method than what we have today).
Subject: Re: Obama reportedly plotting end-run around Congress on global climate change deal
President Obama reportedly plans to do an end-run around Congress to
forge an international climate change deal aimed at getting countries
to cut carbon emissions, in a move likely to draw the ire of
congressional Republicans.
It is also likely to draw the ire (and a multitude of lawsuits) of those who RESPECT the CONSTITUTION.
self-entitled bitch crying (literally) over how crushing her studentI bet she believes her professors should be paid more.
loan debt is going to be. They shot her with Obama posters plastered
Each of the 14 individuals listed above have one thing in common.Each of their last names begin with a consonant.
What was it?
Subject: Republicans sound alarm as White House prepares go-it-alone immigration measures
Lawmakers are sounding the alarm, as they prepare to return from the August recess, over the possibility that President Obama will take sweeping executive actions on immigration in a matter of days – with some Republicans warning of a renewed budget brawl if he takes that step.
http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/politics/~3/2XberEdwZrI/
Subject: Dems’ last ditch hope: Force a shutdown to save the Senate
Broad executive action by President Obama to legalize illegal immigrants may be strategy to goad Republicans into pre-elections government shutdown.
http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/politics/~3/dsIJaMFkCO4/
Subject: Obama under fire for admitting no 'strategy yet' for ISIS in Syria
President Obama is facing intense criticism for admitting Thursday "we don't have a strategy yet" for dealing with Islamic State militants in Syria, despite warnings from top military advisers and others that the group must be confronted on that side of the border.
http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/politics/~3/7PMZE7ksR1s/
Subject: Re: Obama under fire for admitting no 'strategy yet' for ISIS in Syria
Here's a strategy for winning a war:
1. Correctly identify the enemy
2. Kill them
Subject: Re: Obama under fire for admitting no 'strategy yet' for ISIS in Syria
2014-08-29 12:03 from IGnatius T Foobar @uncnsrdSyria
Subject: Re: Obama under fire for admitting no 'strategy yet' for ISIS in
Here's a strategy for winning a war:
1. Correctly identify the enemy
2. Kill them
IG - the problem with your strategy is that it would depend on Obama being suicidal.
Subject: Re: Obama under fire for admitting no 'strategy yet' for ISIS in Syria
Subject: Rogers: Obama’s inertia on Syria-Islamic State part of foreign policy plan empowering rivals
Michigan GOP Rep. Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, said Sunday that President Obama’s inertia on whether to launch air strikes on Islamic State targets in Syria is part of an overall foreign policy failure that is empowering China, North Korea, Russia and other rival nations.
http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/politics/~3/nu7EBWrihkQ/
Subject: Cruz fires up conservatives, says bomb Islamic State 'back to the Stone Age'
Republican Sen. Ted Cruz, a potential 2016 presidential candidate, made clear this weekend his foreign policy strategy for dealing with the militant group Islamic State -- “bomb them back to the stone age.â€
http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/politics/~3/rVSLfY1M3SE/
Subject: Hill intelligence leaders urge Obama to form ISIS strategy ahead of NATO summit
The leaders of the House and Senate intelligence committees criticized President Obama on Sunday for failing to decide yet on whether to hit Islamic State targets in Syria, urging him ahead of this week’s key NATO summit to take decisive action before the militant group attacks on U.S. soil.
http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/politics/~3/GQr9YtOwYlA/
One of the primary weapons of war is subterfuge. Never let the enemy know what you're actually doing. Constant misinformation at every turn.
For all you know, Obama might have a full plan in place and ready, but is fooling everyone.
Although I doubt it.
...and Mooshell, worrying about school lunches, clever, very clever.
Subject: New horizon in heart failure: Investigational drug poised to change cardiology
http://feeds.sciencedaily.com/~r/sciencedaily/top_news/top_science/~3/mlAR9Pf_NdA/140830111804.htm
Those who know me, or who have followed my comments here and elsewhere, know that I am (to say the least) not a fan of Barack Obama.
I suspect something is "up" regarding the US and ISIS/ISIL.
I suspect that even Barack Obama cannot be *such* an "idiot in the Oval Office" to be completely oblivious and uncaring regarding the peril that ISIS/ISIL presents to the United States, Christendom, and the civilized nations we like to call Western Civilization.
I susect that even Barack Obama, thick-skulled though he may be, Marxist though he may be, does not want his legacy to be "the President that Lost the West to Islam."
Hence my prediction:
9-11 is right around the corner. ISIS/ISIL knows this. And along with all Americans, Barack Obama knows this.
ISIS/ISIL made what would, under a more obviously militant and actively patriotic President, be a full-on casus belli in the beheading of an American citizen under full watchful eye of the entire world.
The time between that horrid deed and 9-11 is more than sufficent.
The deployment of 'resources' in or near "Iraq and the Levant" is well more than efficient.
And all that really remains is to give the word.
It is my prediction (which may well end up being totally wrong) that on 9-11 the United States will launch the "Mother of All Blitzkriegs" against all ISIS/ISIL positions in Iraq, Syria, and surrounding areas and completely annihilate them.
Anything less will require launching the Tenth Crusade.
Deus Vult!
It made me think of *this* theory:
* Osama Obama has knowledge of a serious threat to the West (specifically the United States) being set up for 2014-sep-11 and is going to LET IT HAPPEN. *
After *privately* declaring "allahu akbar!" he will then *publicly* trot out the kind of response that boosted the popularity of guys like Bush and Giuliani in 2001, just in time to snatch both houses of Congress for the Hitlercrats in November.