Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 10 11 12 13 [14]
[#] Tue Feb 13 2024 07:52:36 EST from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Execution for crimes against humanity? 

Mon Feb 12 2024 20:14:39 EST from nonservator

Killing someone may or may not be appropriate, lawful, etc. Murder is always wrong.



 



[#] Sat Feb 24 2024 11:58:57 EST from IGnatius T Foobar

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Also quite tired of the whole "diversity of thought" shibboleth. If someone thinks murder is cool, or that murder is cool as long as you're murdering the right people, I have no room in my life for them, and I don't believe a sane and civilized world should have any place for their "diverse thought".

Interesting to see it described that way.  Whenever I've seen "diversity of thought" it was coming from the good guys.  For example, it is used to criticize academia and other institutions when they push "diversity" so hard, diversity of race, ethnicity, sexual preference, etc. etc. but they're happy to discriminate against people who don't have left-leaning thinking.

 

 



[#] Sat Feb 24 2024 15:05:47 EST from nonservator

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Sat Feb 24 2024 11:58:57 EST from IGnatius T Foobar

Also quite tired of the whole "diversity of thought" shibboleth. If someone thinks murder is cool, or that murder is cool as long as you're murdering the right people, I have no room in my life for them, and I don't believe a sane and civilized world should have any place for their "diverse thought".

Interesting to see it described that way.  Whenever I've seen "diversity of thought" it was coming from the good guys.  For example, it is used to criticize academia and other institutions when they push "diversity" so hard, diversity of race, ethnicity, sexual preference, etc. etc. but they're happy to discriminate against people who don't have left-leaning thinking.

 

 



Precisely why this particular turn of phrase began to grate on me. It now strikes me as useless at best and actively counter-productive at worst, like all the appeals to Muh Constitution, because it's so easily turned around and used as a weapon. "Oh, but you wouldn't want to BETRAY your PRECIOUS PRINCIPLES, would you? You wouldn't want to be a HYPOCRITE!" Well, screw that. Because I have absolutely zero compunction about defanging or eliminating those who hate me when I know perfectly well they're perfectly happy to eliminate me "by any means necessary" whenever they think they can get away with it.



[#] Sat Feb 24 2024 15:29:03 EST from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Taking the high road only works in the movies, and when you are a jedi.

In real life, you lose. Your enemy will eat you.



[#] Tue Feb 27 2024 14:50:21 EST from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Canada New Bills introduced: 

  • Criminalizes speech that supports fossil fuels
  • Life time sentences for what they consider hate speech  ( not actions, speech )


[#] Wed Feb 28 2024 20:26:20 EST from zelgomer

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

2024-02-27 19:50 from Nurb432 <nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org>
Canada New Bills introduced: 
* Criminalizes speech that supports fossil fuels
* Life time sentences for what they consider hate speech  ( not
actions, speech )


I never met a Canadian who doesn't deserve it.

[#] Thu Feb 29 2024 06:44:20 EST from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I have met several, that really should have been on the US side of the border.  

 

Wed Feb 28 2024 20:26:20 EST from zelgomer
I never met a Canadian who doesn't deserve it.

 



[#] Thu Feb 29 2024 09:15:31 EST from IGnatius T Foobar

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

* Criminalizes speech that supports fossil fuels

That sounds a bit much, even for Chinada. I would be surprised if that became the law of the land.

[#] Thu Feb 29 2024 09:33:42 EST from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I doubt it makes it thru and becomes law, but just the fact it is even being attempted is just insane. 



[#] Fri Mar 01 2024 08:22:51 EST from nonservator

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

OSNews headline: Wikipedia no longer considers CNET a “generally reliable” source after “AI” scandal

First: LOL^9999999999

Second: "A reliable source is a reliable source."

Third: Mass murderer no longer considers wife beater to be a "source of moral authority".

Fourth: So you have one commenter on OSNews who no longer considers Wikipedia a reliable source, who decries their censorship, who says they're a source of indoctrination and false information. Not because of their long history...but because of one specific incident that he doesn't like.In this case, because WIkipedia blocked him for stating that someone was French and not Catalonian.

"Everything was fine until MY PERSONAL BUGABOO WAS OFFENDED."

I didn't see the new Joker movie, but I believe there is a quote from it that seems appropriate:

"YOU GET WHAT YOU FUCKING DESERVE!"



[#] Fri Mar 01 2024 09:11:50 EST from IGnatius T Foobar

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

In the words of Daffy Duck: "Oh, it is to laugh." As if Wikipedophilia was ever a source of reliable information outside of the opinion of the brain damaged college professors who dominate its editorial regime. It will be interesting to see the wikipedophilia editors arguing with the people who train "AI" models as they fight over what they think the truth is.

[#] Sun Mar 03 2024 07:51:17 EST from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I guess part of that 'hate speech is a life sentence' nonsense in Canada, there is a provision to arrest people if the cops suspect they may commit hate speech in the future.  Geeesh

Orwell is spinning in his gave about now..  "i warned you idiots"

 



[#] Sun Mar 03 2024 18:09:53 EST from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hmm and i think there are rewards for turning people in...



Go to page: First ... 10 11 12 13 [14]