Y'all should see me in FreeBSD Discord.  It's cat puns all day erry day!

Also, MEOWY CATSMAS!

Krampus?

Mon Dec 26 2022 01:36:29 PM EST from IGnatius T Foobar

I like my cats WAY more than Satan Claus.

lol

Greetings. New user here. This is strange site. When I register, warning message says information is not secure. And no email is asked for. And no terms of service. Did I miss something? I will now explore the site.

and no ssl around here...

Tue Jan 03 2023 06:39:42 PM EST from darknetuser Subject: Re: New user here.

Welcome. This place is quite informal. If you have any doubts just ask away.

well damn. why did i not try that before?

Wed Jan 04 2023 01:26:05 PM EST from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: New user here.

Actually, https://uncensored.citadel.org should work just fine. Welcome!

Can you <Z> forget rooms on Web Cit? 

Si su puede! 

Not real sure where this fits, but its funny.

the uk government ( and others ) are trying to eradicate the drone/RC plane hobby.

As evidence of "how dangerous these things are", and that they need to basically ban them outright, to get public support they posted a picture of "evidence": Its a picture out of the window of a jetliner above the clouds so at at least 30,000 feet, ( ill estimate around 600 mph, might be off, but close enough ) with a tiny prop drone hovering outside the window...  

As freaking ludicrous as this is, the sad part is the unwashed masses will believe it and demand action. 

The question is, why would the governments be so afraid of civilians having the ability to have remote controlled cameras in the skies as a simple hobby? 

The answer is pretty obvious. A collision with a small civilian drone would be less threat to any sized airplane than a bird strike. 

So... what are they ACTUALLY worried about? 

Sat Jan 07 2023 09:44:36 EST from Nurb432

Not real sure where this fits, but its funny.

the uk government ( and others ) are trying to eradicate the drone/RC plane hobby.

As evidence of "how dangerous these things are", and that they need to basically ban them outright, to get public support they posted a picture of "evidence": Its a picture out of the window of a jetliner above the clouds so at at least 30,000 feet, ( ill estimate around 600 mph, might be off, but close enough ) with a tiny prop drone hovering outside the window...  

As freaking ludicrous as this is, the sad part is the unwashed masses will believe it and demand action. 

serfs dont need hobbies.

Sun Jan 22 2023 01:43:37 PM EST from ParanoidDelusions

The question is, why would the governments be so afraid of civilians having the ability to have remote controlled cameras in the skies as a simple hobby? 

 

I know what sounds good, french toast. I should run over to the store to get some milk bread and eggs.

So according to the weather people we were supposed to get hard with snow today, but really nothing out of the ordinary for winter in the Midwest... In reality however, it ended up being almost nothing.

I actually heard someone yesterday: "its man made climate change that is causing this huge snow storm of the century"

Then when it didnt happen " its man made climate change that caused such a small amount of snow to fall"

1 - its winter in the Midwest, it snows

2- make up your freaking mind.. 

Sun Jan 22 2023 13:43:37 EST from ParanoidDelusions

The question is, why would the governments be so afraid of civilians having the ability to have remote controlled cameras in the skies as a simple hobby? 

The answer is pretty obvious. A collision with a small civilian drone would be less threat to any sized airplane than a bird strike. 

So... what are they ACTUALLY worried about? 

 

Correction: collision with an unmodded drone would have less impact than a bird collision. Imagine that drone is carrying a stick of TNT or some home-made explosives (speaking of hobbyists). Imagine that drone flying around an airport, shopping mall, or school. Or a busy freeway.