Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... Last
↑↑↑ Old messages ↑↑↑            ↓↓↓ New messages ↓↓↓
[#] Sun May 27 2012 23:57:39 EDT from dms @ Uncensored

Subject: Firefox but not Chrome

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hey guys,

Any idea why my freshly-installed-from-debs Citadel server would work fine under firefox but "Not found" is displayed under Chrome?

Thanks



[#] Mon May 28 2012 05:19:05 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Firefox but not Chrome

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

are you installing with an apache/nginx proxy?

 



[#] Mon May 28 2012 10:45:12 EDT from inpact1 @ Uncensored

Subject: webcit & citadel start

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hello everybody

i have a few issues when i try to make an apt-get upgrade

insserv: Starting webcit depends on nxsensor and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true!

insserv: Starting citadel depends on nxsensor and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true!

insserv: Starting webcit depends on nxsensor and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true!
insserv: Starting citadel depends on nxsensor and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true!

i also noticed that webcit doesn't start automacly after a server reboot, i have to make an

/etc/init.d/webcit start


i used the easyinstall , and i allready tried to reinstall

thank you for you help :-)



[#] Mon May 28 2012 10:54:43 EDT from Robert di Rosa @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: webcit & citadel start

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hello Again

i solved it, it was some conflict with my wmware player !

sorry for my post

 



[#] Mon May 28 2012 17:24:44 EDT from dms @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Firefox but not Chrome

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I'm not. Should I?



[#] Mon May 28 2012 23:12:52 EDT from kafmil @ Uncensored

Subject: Subaddress or Address tags???

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I need to use subaddressing / address tags for an application on my Server. Subaddressing or Address tags refers to the abiity to send email appended with extra info, eg if my email address is info@email.com, I can send mail to info-responder@email.com, or info+responder@email.com and the email will be accepted, with the address tag in place so that I can use it from an application.

Does anyone know if Virtualmin supports this functionality. I know Zimbra supports them but I have been looking at Citadel and VirtualMin, as I am using Webmin already. I can't find any info about support for address tags for either Citadel or Virtualmin.

TIA



[#] Tue May 29 2012 02:47:53 EDT from Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II

Subject: libcitadel-8.11 missing from downloads

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I saw in Citanews that there was a new release.

The libcitadel-8.11.tar.gz file appears to missing from the actual source server...citadel-8.11.tar.gz and webcit-8.11.tar.gz are both there, but libcitadel results in a "not found".



[#] Tue May 29 2012 03:54:43 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Subaddress or Address tags???

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Mon May 28 2012 23:12:52 EDT from kafmil @ Uncensored Subject: Subaddress or Address tags???

I need to use subaddressing / address tags for an application on my Server. Subaddressing or Address tags refers to the abiity to send email appended with extra info, eg if my email address is info@email.com, I can send mail to info-responder@email.com, or info+responder@email.com and the email will be accepted, with the address tag in place so that I can use it from an application.

Does anyone know if Virtualmin supports this functionality. I know Zimbra supports them but I have been looking at Citadel and VirtualMin, as I am using Webmin already. I can't find any info about support for address tags for either Citadel or Virtualmin.

TIA



if you mean something like http://www.everything-mdaemon.com/mdaemon/a-subaddressing-introduction , this is possible in citadel with a shared / public maileable room.

have a look at:

http://www.citadel.org/doku.php?id=faq:everydayuse:how_do_i_post_messages_via_smtp_mail_into_a_room#how.do.i.post.messages.via.smtp.mail.into.a.room

http://www.citadel.org/doku.php?id=faq:everydayuse:how_do_i_beautify_the_mailname_of_a_public_room#how.do.i.beautify.the.mailname.of.a.public.room

as you might have already noted, this is the citadel support forum, not the virtualmin forum. you will have to ask that question else where.



[#] Tue May 29 2012 08:02:15 EDT from gefshep @ Uncensored

Subject: Ports and Dates.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]



[#] Tue May 29 2012 12:50:12 EDT from mtg @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Solved: citadel-server log: "Address family not supported by protocol"

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Sun May 06 2012 12:06:36 EDTfrom "Jörg-Volker Peetz" <jvpeetz@web.de> Subject: Solved: citadel-server log: "Address family not supported by protocol"
 
Hello,
 
Meanwhile I have upgraded to the debian package from unstable 8.05-3 of the
citadel-server. Before starting the citadel-server, I now stopped the
exim4-daemon on port 25. Then the server starts and is able to open all ports
without trying to use the IPv6 protocol (controlled with strace).
 
I have the same problem with 8.11 on a IPv4 only system. If I can bind the services to an
IP it works. If I setup citadel to a wildcard address it fails. If I use an IP address it works.
Maybe webcit try to use the wildcard address. Is there an option to bind webcit to an address?
 
Thanks
Matthias
 


[#] Tue May 29 2012 15:19:17 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: libcitadel-8.11 missing from downloads

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The libcitadel-8.11.tar.gz file appears to missing from the actual
source server...citadel-8.11.tar.gz and webcit-8.11.tar.gz are both
there, but libcitadel results in a "not found".

Fixed. There was something wrong with the release script and it gave the file the wrong name. (Still broken but I renamed it manually.)

[#] Wed May 30 2012 01:26:09 EDT from norbus @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi Guys: Long time no chat. Here's my dilemna. We at barbaria.norbus.com are having problems with WebCit dieing when it hits some room or particular message that kills the entire web server. Unfortunately, we are down to just a few (less < 10) users left from the Santa Barbara Citadel community. Is Steve still around to help figure out what weird back tick or such is causing our version of the software (too old to upgrade by far) so folks who have gone to the government world and are banned from telnet but could use web to get our users back in the fold? I would be happy to give any SSH access to the WebCit developer to our clunky old system. Also, I could give a small gift card or other token of appreciation for an hour or two's worth of work.
We just don't have the C programming to figure it out. If you are willing to help us out, just log in to barbaria.norbus.com at 24.23.186.76 and create an account to say you can help. Otherwise, our telnet barred userbase will dwindle to below critical mass.

[#] Wed May 30 2012 01:26:54 EDT from norbus @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

norbus@hotmail.com

[#] Wed May 30 2012 02:42:56 EDT from Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II

Subject: Re: libcitadel-8.11 missing from downloads

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Tue May 29 2012 03:19:17 PM EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject: Re: libcitadel-8.11 missing from downloads
The libcitadel-8.11.tar.gz file appears to missing from the actual
source server...citadel-8.11.tar.gz and webcit-8.11.tar.gz are both
there, but libcitadel results in a "not found".

Fixed. There was something wrong with the release script and it gave the file the wrong name. (Still broken but I renamed it manually.)

Got it...thanks.

Another question...on what version of Linux has the citadel build been performed?

I've got a fully updated CentOS 5.8 server running, and configure fails on citadel 8.11 because it has an issue with ares_parse_mx_reply "not found or not usable". I seem to recall installing the c-ares and c-ares-devel packages for one of the previous Citadel 8.xx releases...but it appears that something new is afoot, here.



[#] Wed May 30 2012 03:38:38 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: libcitadel-8.11 missing from downloads

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Wed May 30 2012 02:42:56 EDTfrom Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II Subject: Re: libcitadel-8.11 missing from downloads

 I've got a fully updated CentOS 5.8 server running, and configure fails on citadel 8.11 because it has an issue with ares_parse_mx_reply "not found or not usable". I seem to recall installing the c-ares and c-ares-devel packages for one of the previous Citadel 8.xx releases...but it appears that something new is afoot, here.

FD, as http://citadel.org/doku.php?id=installation:source tells, you need at least 1.74

older versions don't know howto parse mx replies.

do you compile by yourself? or use the spec files from the obs? or use easy install?



[#] Wed May 30 2012 04:36:37 EDT from Stefan @ Uncensored

Subject: Wiki with Umlauts still

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The Wiki is still broken when using umlauts.

example: https://uncensored.citadel.org/wiki?page=Ölig

I can edit the content, but it will never be shown to me (There is no page called 'lig' here.)

I don't think that removing the umlauts is the right way to go. That's a bad user experience.

Regards
Stefan



[#] Wed May 30 2012 08:07:06 EDT from "traut" <trautloft@greenhearts.org> to room_citadel_support@uncensored.citadel.org

Subject: Re: [Citadel Support] Citadel error on ubuntu precise 12.04

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

marcobto58 <marcobto58@...> writes:




Hi everybody

I installed citadel on ubuntu 12.04  precise and I get a lot of these errors:
 
.....
May 10 14:17:32 PC244344 citadel: DB: PANIC: Invalid argumentMay 10 14:17:32
PC244344 citadel: bdb(): PANIC: Invalid argumentMay 10 14:17:32 PC244344
citadel: bdb(): txn_commit: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database
recoveryMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: DB: not a restored transactionMay 10
14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: DB: PANIC: Invalid argumentMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344
citadel: bdb(): PANIC: Invalid argumentMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: bdb():
txn_commit: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recoveryMay 10 14:17:33
PC244344 citadel: DB: not a restored transactionMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344
citadel: DB: PANIC: Invalid argumentMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: bdb():
PANIC: Invalid argumentMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: bdb(): txn_commit:
DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run database recoveryMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344
citadel: DB: not a restored transactionMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: DB:
PANIC: Invalid argumentMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: bdb(): PANIC: Invalid
argumentMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: bdb(): txn_commit: DB_RUNRECOVERY:
Fatal error, run database recoveryMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: DB: not a
restored transactionMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: DB: PANIC: Invalid
argumentMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: bdb(): PANIC: Invalid argumentMay 10
14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: bdb(): txn_commit: DB_RUNRECOVERY: Fatal error, run
database recoveryMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: DB: not a restored
transactionMay 10 14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: DB: PANIC: Invalid argumentMay 10
14:17:33 PC244344 citadel: bdb(): PANIC: Invalid argument
....
 
I also read about this bug

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/citadel/+bug/911732
can someone help me?


Same here with Precise. Fresh install of citadel from precise repo

also apport log is full of these:

executable: /usr/sbin/citserver (command line "/usr/sbin/citserver -d -x3 -lmail
-t/dev/null")
ERROR: apport (pid 26062)
is_closing_session(): no DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS in environment
ERROR: apport (pid 26062)
apport: report /var/crash/_usr_sbin_citserver.0.crash already exists and unseen,
doing nothing to avoid disk usage DoS

[#] Wed May 30 2012 13:33:15 EDT from horschd @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: citadel failed on OpenBSD

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hello,

 

I tried to solve the gmake error on OpenBSD (Citadel 8.11)

...

./event_client.h:254: error: expected ')' before 'Type'
gmake: *** [server_main.o] Error 1

First I installed libbind-9.4.2 to get the "ns_type" function in /usr/local/include/bind/arpa/nameser.h which is _not_ included in the system header /usr/include/arpa/nameser.h

Replacing in event_client.h

#include <arpa/nameser.h>

to

#include <bind/arpa/nameser.h>

does not work (same error). It uses the wrong system header without "ns_type".

 

Next I tried to add "-I /usr/local/include/bind"

SUPPORT=/usr/local/ctdlsupport
INCADD="-I /usr/local/include -I /usr/local/include/bind"
LDADD="-L /usr/local/lib"
CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -I${SUPPORT}/include ${INCADD} -g"
CPPFLAGS="${CFLAGS}"
LDFLAGS="-L${SUPPORT}/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,${SUPPORT}/lib ${LDADD}"
export CFLAGS CPPFLAGS LDFLAGS

./configure --prefix=/usr/local/citadel

 

seems to be a solution (output of configure):

...

checking arpa/nameser.h usability... yes
checking arpa/nameser.h presence... yes
checking for arpa/nameser.h... yes
checking arpa/nameser_compat.h usability... yes
checking arpa/nameser_compat.h presence... yes
checking for arpa/nameser_compat.h... yes
...

but gmake fails:

...

utillib/citadel_ipc.c: In function 'tcp_connectsock':
utillib/citadel_ipc.c:2613: error: 'AI_NUMERICSERV' undeclared (first use in this function)
utillib/citadel_ipc.c:2613: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
utillib/citadel_ipc.c:2613: error: for each function it appears in.)
gmake: *** [utillib/citadel_ipc.o] Error 1

Any idea to solve this problem?

Thanks in advance

horschd



[#] Thu May 31 2012 00:55:33 EDT from shackra @ Uncensored

Subject: libcitadel-8.11 fails on build with GCC4.7

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hello!

I was trying to compile Libcitadel on Parabola GNU/Linux-libre which have GCC4.7 and I got this error:


LTCompile: /bin/sh ./libtool --silent --mode=compile x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -I./lib -I. -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes -fexceptions -D HAVE_MMAP -o buildinfo -c

CC: lib/tools.c
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:642:0,
                 from lib/tools.c:29:
lib/tools.c: In function 'remove_token':
/usr/include/bits/string3.h:103:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'strcpy': function not inlinable
lib/tools.c:272:9: error: called from here
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:642:0,
                 from lib/tools.c:29:
lib/tools.c: In function 'is_msg_in_sequence_set':
/usr/include/bits/string3.h:103:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'strcpy': function not inlinable
lib/tools.c:630:10: error: called from here
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:642:0,
                 from lib/tools.c:29:
lib/tools.c: In function 'stripout':
/usr/include/bits/string3.h:103:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'strcpy': function not inlinable
lib/tools.c:774:23: error: called from here
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:642:0,
                 from lib/tools.c:29:
/usr/include/bits/string3.h:103:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'strcpy': function not inlinable
lib/tools.c:779:23: error: called from here
In file included from /usr/include/string.h:642:0,
                 from lib/tools.c:29:
lib/tools.c: In function 'is_msg_in_mset':
/usr/include/bits/string3.h:103:1: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'strcpy': function not inlinable
lib/tools.c:1124:10: error: called from here
make: *** [lib/tools.lo] Error 1
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...

 



[#] Thu May 31 2012 01:27:36 EDT from Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II

Subject: Re: libcitadel-8.11 missing from downloads

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

FD, as http://citadel.org/doku.php?id=installation:source tells, you
need at least 1.74

older versions don't know howto parse mx replies.

do you compile by yourself? or use the spec files from the obs? or
use easy install?

In this case, I used the RPM that was made available for CentOS 5.8. I ran short on time, last night, so I didn't go looking for a src.rpm or a higher version.

Looks like I can grab the Fedora 16 RPMs (32 and 64bit) from rpmfind.net. since even the CentOS 6.2 packaged version is only 1.70 (and I've no idea, at present, if that has the MX capability back ported).

Go to page: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... Last