Language:

en_US

switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 ... Last
[#] Mon Sep 16 2024 15:19:34 UTC from flexistrength

Subject: trouble connecting to server from mobile phone

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I haven't tried that particular app. It shouldn't make a difference. Thunderbird seems to find it on desktop with IMAP.

I might try another app later, but so far 2 different android and one ios device "cannot connect to server".



[#] Mon Sep 16 2024 15:57:58 UTC from Nurb432

Subject: Re: trouble connecting to server from mobile phone

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Dumb question, can you get to the web interface on the phone? Almost sounds like a network issue with your mobile carrier, not a citadel one ( since you can do imap from your desktop )

Once upon a time, one of the ISPs i had blocked incoming on several ports on a 'home connection' so i was unable to run a mail server, unless i bought a static IP.  They also blocked a couple of outgoing ( but 80 and 22 were open for incoming, oddly enough )    My current ISP, we have a 'neighborhood NAT' which kills *all* incoming, again, unless you by static.

Not saying that is it, but it would be my first test, to see if i could get to web ports.. then purely to the ports ( no client. just the port )

Mon Sep 16 2024 11:19:34 EDT from flexistrength Subject: trouble connecting to server from mobile phone

I haven't tried that particular app. It shouldn't make a difference. Thunderbird seems to find it on desktop with IMAP.

I might try another app later, but so far 2 different android and one ios device "cannot connect to server".



 



[#] Tue Sep 17 2024 01:25:19 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Re: Remote IP creating users?

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Here's an example of a message from Aide.

New user account <nobody> has been created, from host 185.171.202.9.rev.dyjix.eu [185.171.202.9].

This is baffling.  If you have self-service account creation turned off, there should be no way to do this.

Unless ... you are using host system authentication, or LDAP authentication, instead of Citadel's self-contained authentication?  Are the names of the accounts (such as "nobody") the names of accounts from your host system or LDAP authentication source, and never some unknown name?

Because if that's the case, then it's possible that our shithead intruders are trying names that are likely to exist (nobody, www, sshd, uucp, mail, news, etc) and they do exist so Citadel creates matching accounts ... but unless the intruder knows the password, it will only create the account, but they won't actually be able to log in.

Is it possible that this is what's happening?



[#] Tue Sep 17 2024 01:28:33 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Re: trouble connecting to server from mobile phone

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Once upon a time, one of the ISPs i had blocked incoming on several ports on a 'home connection' so i was unable to run a mail server, unless i bought a static IP.  They also blocked a couple of outgoing ( but 80 and 22 were open for incoming, oddly enough )    My current ISP, we have a 'neighborhood NAT' which kills *all* incoming, again, unless you by static.

That might be it.  Maybe try it with your phone on wifi, using an IP address that works from the desktop.   Are you self-hosting Citadel behind a retail grade Internet connection, or are you running it at a data center with commercial Internet service?



[#] Tue Sep 17 2024 14:07:31 UTC from cjonline

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi, I need help with spamassassin.. It marks the spam correct but is not adding the ** SPAM ** flag to the subject..  please help.. this has never worked since day 1.

Craig.

 

 

SAMPLE EMAIL-

Subject: You have been selected to win a Chanel Perfume from Boots!
Message-ID: <138431787230895.8.PZH1682504663@marketstandard.click>
From: "Boots" <Chanel.Perfume-hwp@marketstandard.click>
X-Spam-Level: *******
X-Spam-Status: True, score=7.4 required=2.0
 
 
CONFIG -
 
# Add *****SPAM***** to the Subject header of spam e-mails # rewrite_header Subject [***** SPAM _SCORE_ *****] # Save spam messages as a message/rfc822 MIME attachment instead of # modifying the original message (0: off, 2: use text/plain instead) # report_safe 0 # Set which networks or hosts are considered 'trusted' by your mail # server (i.e. not spammers) # # trusted_networks 212.17.35. # Set file-locking method (flock is not safe over NFS, but is faster) # # lock_method flock # Set the threshold at which a message is considered spam (default: 5.0) # required_score 2.0 # Use Bayesian classifier (default: 1) # use_bayes 1 # Bayesian classifier auto-learning (default: 1) # bayes_auto_learn 1


[#] Thu Sep 19 2024 17:21:10 UTC from luisgo

Subject: Ask for correction in WebCit software.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Dear All,

I managed to access my WebCit with port 443 (https) when WebCit is in another port. Using the Proxy in Apache.

I have a colocated Apache web server in the same server. 

I access like:

https://mydomain.net/courrier/

As I seen in the Apache logs when some icons are accessed in the server are like this:

GET /static/webcit_icons/citadel-button-32x32.gif

with error 404

and others are accessed as:

GET /courrier/static/webcit_icons/essen/16x16/delete.png

with success.

Then there are many icons missing. It works fine but without many icons.

Thanks,

Luís Gonçalves.

PS If some maintainer of Citadel wants to have my Proxy settings can contact me to my email. I used the http WebCit. The Proxy points to http WebCit. 

Then the result is this:

 
 
 


[#] Thu Sep 19 2024 18:39:40 UTC from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I realize its not the same setup you have, so may not translate or even be the same issue, but i found that many of my internal sites would lose stuff like that unless i turned on websocket support in my NGINX proxy for that particular application.

If i dont use httpS it didn't seem to care and worked ok, but if i did mandate SSL ( Which i do ), i had to turn that on.



[#] Fri Sep 20 2024 05:40:45 UTC from luisgo

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I tried the websockets with:

ProxyPass /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

ProxyPassReverse /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

And gave the same problem.

 

Thu Sep 19 2024 14:39:40 EDT from Nurb432

I realize its not the same setup you have, so may not translate or even be the same issue, but i found that many of my internal sites would lose stuff like that unless i turned on websocket support in my NGINX proxy for that particular application.

If i dont use httpS it didn't seem to care and worked ok, but if i did mandate SSL ( Which i do ), i had to turn that on.



 



[#] Fri Sep 20 2024 13:25:48 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I managed to access my WebCit with port 443 (https) when WebCit
is in another port. Using the Proxy in Apache.

In the current implementation of WebCit, if you want to share the web server port with another web server, the best way to do it is to set up the proxied WebCit as a VirtualHost in Apache. Trying to make it work by URL prefix will not work. We've tried to get that working in the past but the code is just too tangled.

The rewrite of WebCit that is currently in development will allow this because we were very strict about putting the "/ctdl/" prefix in front of the whole system. But that version won't be ready until at least next year, so I don't want to go too far down the Osborne Effect road :)

Just set up an alias and use VirtualHost+ProxyPass. That will definitely work.

[#] Fri Sep 20 2024 14:04:11 UTC from luisgo

Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Dear All,

I implemented with VirtualHost+ProxyPass. I did not used the Key word "Alias" but:

ProxyPass /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

ProxyPassReverse /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

 

with xxxx the port of http WebCit.

And it is full funcional but some (many) missing icons. It works very well. I am pleased that you will solve that problem in the next release.

Thanks,

Luis.

 

Fri Sep 20 2024 09:25:48 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.
I managed to access my WebCit with port 443 (https) when WebCit
is in another port. Using the Proxy in Apache.

In the current implementation of WebCit, if you want to share the web server port with another web server, the best way to do it is to set up the proxied WebCit as a VirtualHost in Apache. Trying to make it work by URL prefix will not work. We've tried to get that working in the past but the code is just too tangled.

The rewrite of WebCit that is currently in development will allow this because we were very strict about putting the "/ctdl/" prefix in front of the whole system. But that version won't be ready until at least next year, so I don't want to go too far down the Osborne Effect road :)

Just set up an alias and use VirtualHost+ProxyPass. That will definitely work.

 



[#] Fri Sep 20 2024 20:37:21 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I implemented with VirtualHost+ProxyPass. I did not used the Key
word "Alias" but:

ProxyPass /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

ProxyPassReverse /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

If you are using a VirtualHost you should proxy the root, not "/courrier".
Just push the whole site through unchanged.

[#] Fri Sep 20 2024 21:05:52 UTC from nonservator

Subject: Current downloads

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Ig - After Lunduke's coverage of Nextcloud 9 I was mildly annoyed at the available options on their site. Went looking for alternatives and most of the ones suggested were merely for file hosting, then I remembered Citadel is a broader groupware thing as well. But https://citadel.org/download.html doesn't appear to have any links for Docker or otherwise, and unlike most times I'm using a browser with pretty much everything enabled. What are my current options to install and run Cit? Sorry if I missed something obvious - it wouldn't be the first time.



[#] Sat Sep 21 2024 09:30:54 UTC from luisgo

Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The objective is to have Citadel Webmail throught https which the port is usually open in firewalls. Usually other ports used by Webcit are blocked in firewalls. This is for using when Apache coexists with Citadel in the same server.

Now, I will explain how I done without missing any information.

In ssl.conf: This is for IPv6. There is a Virtual Host also for IPv4. This must work as it is with only changing where says "changed". You may/can put this in Citadel Faq.

****************************************

<VirtualHost [xxxx:xxx:xxxx:xxx::x]:443> #changed

DocumentRoot "/xxxxx/html" #changed

SSLEngine on

SSLProtocol -All +TLSv1 +TLSv1.1 +TLSv1.2

SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT:+SSLv2:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW

SSLCertificateFile /xxxx/ssl/xxxxxx.crt #changed

SSLCertificateKeyFile /xxxx/ssl/xxxxxxx.key #changed

SSLCACertificateFile /xxxx/ssl/xxxxxx.cer #changed

LogLevel warn

ErrorLog logs/ipv6_ssl_error_log 

CustomLog logs/ipv6_ssl_access_log \

     "%h %a %l %I %O %u %t %X %T %D \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\" \"%{User-Agent}i\" %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x"

SSLProxyEngine on

ProxyPass /courrier/ http://[::1]:xxxx/  #changed

ProxyPassReverse /courrier/ http://[::1]:xxxx/ #changed

</VirtualHost>                                  

************************************

I access the site as:

https://mydomain.net/courrier/     #changed

Thanks,

Luís.

 

 

 

Fri Sep 20 2024 16:37:21 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.
I implemented with VirtualHost+ProxyPass. I did not used the Key
word "Alias" but:

ProxyPass /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

ProxyPassReverse /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

If you are using a VirtualHost you should proxy the root, not "/courrier".
Just push the whole site through unchanged.

 



[#] Sat Sep 21 2024 10:51:52 UTC from Nurb432

Subject: Re: Current downloads

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

the 2 i would use

 
Personally im not a huge fan of docker unless i have no practical choice to install something 'native'. 
 
And a discussion for another room, im curious what you didn't like about nextcloud. I love the thing. Tho i'm on Hub 8 (29.0.5)
Fri Sep 20 2024 17:05:52 EDT from nonservator Subject: Current downloads

Ig - After Lunduke's coverage of Nextcloud 9 I was mildly annoyed at the available options on their site. Went looking for alternatives and most of the ones suggested were merely for file hosting, then I remembered Citadel is a broader groupware thing as well. But https://citadel.org/download.html doesn't appear to have any links for Docker or otherwise, and unlike most times I'm using a browser with pretty much everything enabled. What are my current options to install and run Cit? Sorry if I missed something obvious - it wouldn't be the first time.



 



[#] Sat Sep 21 2024 11:47:03 UTC from luisgo

Subject: Simple question.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Dear All,

Can a Server Side Filter Rule have more than a recipient email in a forward (or other operations)?

e.g.

Can I forward as:

dummy1@domain1.net,dummy2@domain2.net

or I have to do 2 rules, one for each recipient email?

Thanks,

Luís.



[#] Wed Sep 25 2024 21:40:01 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Re: Current downloads

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

as well. But https://citadel.org/download.html doesn't appear to
have any links for Docker or otherwise, and unlike most times

Ummm...? Docker is the very first option on the page. I think I am not understanding your question?

[#] Wed Sep 25 2024 21:40:45 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Re: Simple question.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

dummy1@domain1.net,dummy2@domain2.net

or I have to do 2 rules, one for each recipient email?

Good question! I don't know off hand, but try it and see.

[#] Thu Sep 26 2024 08:56:08 UTC from luisgo

Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Dear All,

I found a problem with this setting that I think it must be solved by the maintainers/developers of Citadel.

The emails accessed this way though proxy and WebCit, the timezone presented is from the server (Centos/Ubuntu etc) that hosts Citadel and not from the operating system of the browser. I think this must be solved someway.

I think because the WebCit is called within the server.

Thanks,

Luis.

 

Sat Sep 21 2024 05:30:54 EDT from luisgo Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.

The objective is to have Citadel Webmail throught https which the port is usually open in firewalls. Usually other ports used by Webcit are blocked in firewalls. This is for using when Apache coexists with Citadel in the same server.

Now, I will explain how I done without missing any information.

In ssl.conf: This is for IPv6. There is a Virtual Host also for IPv4. This must work as it is with only changing where says "changed". You may/can put this in Citadel Faq.

****************************************

<VirtualHost [xxxx:xxx:xxxx:xxx::x]:443> #changed

DocumentRoot "/xxxxx/html" #changed

SSLEngine on

SSLProtocol -All +TLSv1 +TLSv1.1 +TLSv1.2

SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT:+SSLv2:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW

SSLCertificateFile /xxxx/ssl/xxxxxx.crt #changed

SSLCertificateKeyFile /xxxx/ssl/xxxxxxx.key #changed

SSLCACertificateFile /xxxx/ssl/xxxxxx.cer #changed

LogLevel warn

ErrorLog logs/ipv6_ssl_error_log 

CustomLog logs/ipv6_ssl_access_log \

     "%h %a %l %I %O %u %t %X %T %D \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\" \"%{User-Agent}i\" %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x"

SSLProxyEngine on

ProxyPass /courrier/ http://[::1]:xxxx/  #changed

ProxyPassReverse /courrier/ http://[::1]:xxxx/ #changed

</VirtualHost>                                  

************************************

I access the site as:

https://mydomain.net/courrier/     #changed

Thanks,

Luís.

 

 

 

Fri Sep 20 2024 16:37:21 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.
I implemented with VirtualHost+ProxyPass. I did not used the Key
word "Alias" but:

ProxyPass /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

ProxyPassReverse /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

If you are using a VirtualHost you should proxy the root, not "/courrier".
Just push the whole site through unchanged.

 



 



[#] Thu Sep 26 2024 09:39:45 UTC from luisgo

Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Dear All,

Sugestion:

It may put as configuration in "Advanced" -> "Change your preferences and settings" a parameter that is the timezone used by WebCit for each user.

Thanks,

Luis.

Thu Sep 26 2024 04:56:08 EDT from luisgo Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.

Dear All,

I found a problem with this setting that I think it must be solved by the maintainers/developers of Citadel.

The emails accessed this way though proxy and WebCit, the timezone presented is from the server (Centos/Ubuntu etc) that hosts Citadel and not from the operating system of the browser. I think this must be solved someway.

I think because the WebCit is called within the server.

Thanks,

Luis.

 

Sat Sep 21 2024 05:30:54 EDT from luisgo Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.

The objective is to have Citadel Webmail throught https which the port is usually open in firewalls. Usually other ports used by Webcit are blocked in firewalls. This is for using when Apache coexists with Citadel in the same server.

Now, I will explain how I done without missing any information.

In ssl.conf: This is for IPv6. There is a Virtual Host also for IPv4. This must work as it is with only changing where says "changed". You may/can put this in Citadel Faq.

****************************************

<VirtualHost [xxxx:xxx:xxxx:xxx::x]:443> #changed

DocumentRoot "/xxxxx/html" #changed

SSLEngine on

SSLProtocol -All +TLSv1 +TLSv1.1 +TLSv1.2

SSLCipherSuite ALL:!ADH:!EXPORT:+SSLv2:RC4+RSA:+HIGH:+MEDIUM:+LOW

SSLCertificateFile /xxxx/ssl/xxxxxx.crt #changed

SSLCertificateKeyFile /xxxx/ssl/xxxxxxx.key #changed

SSLCACertificateFile /xxxx/ssl/xxxxxx.cer #changed

LogLevel warn

ErrorLog logs/ipv6_ssl_error_log 

CustomLog logs/ipv6_ssl_access_log \

     "%h %a %l %I %O %u %t %X %T %D \"%r\" %>s %b \"%{Referer}i\" \"%{User-Agent}i\" %{SSL_PROTOCOL}x %{SSL_CIPHER}x"

SSLProxyEngine on

ProxyPass /courrier/ http://[::1]:xxxx/  #changed

ProxyPassReverse /courrier/ http://[::1]:xxxx/ #changed

</VirtualHost>                                  

************************************

I access the site as:

https://mydomain.net/courrier/     #changed

Thanks,

Luís.

 

 

 

Fri Sep 20 2024 16:37:21 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: Ask for correction in WebCit software.
I implemented with VirtualHost+ProxyPass. I did not used the Key
word "Alias" but:

ProxyPass /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

ProxyPassReverse /courrier/ ws://127.0.0.1:xxxx/

If you are using a VirtualHost you should proxy the root, not "/courrier".
Just push the whole site through unchanged.

 



 



 



[#] Thu Sep 26 2024 12:58:08 UTC from cjonline

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Please.. I really need help on this.. additional headers I add to local.cnf are also not being shown in the email header..  I've tried lots of different things but no matter what I do, subject or headers do not get amended or added.

same problem here - https://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic/spamassassin-aender-subject-und-fuegt-headers-/

 

thx

Craig.

 

Tue Sep 17 2024 10:07:31 EDT from cjonline

Hi, I need help with spamassassin.. It marks the spam correct but is not adding the ** SPAM ** flag to the subject..  please help.. this has never worked since day 1.

Craig.

 

 

SAMPLE EMAIL-

Subject: You have been selected to win a Chanel Perfume from Boots!
Message-ID: <138431787230895.8.PZH1682504663@marketstandard.click>
From: "Boots" <Chanel.Perfume-hwp@marketstandard.click>
X-Spam-Level: *******
X-Spam-Status: True, score=7.4 required=2.0
 
 
CONFIG -
 
# Add *****SPAM***** to the Subject header of spam e-mails # rewrite_header Subject [***** SPAM _SCORE_ *****] # Save spam messages as a message/rfc822 MIME attachment instead of # modifying the original message (0: off, 2: use text/plain instead) # report_safe 0 # Set which networks or hosts are considered 'trusted' by your mail # server (i.e. not spammers) # # trusted_networks 212.17.35. # Set file-locking method (flock is not safe over NFS, but is faster) # # lock_method flock # Set the threshold at which a message is considered spam (default: 5.0) # required_score 2.0 # Use Bayesian classifier (default: 1) # use_bayes 1 # Bayesian classifier auto-learning (default: 1) # bayes_auto_learn 1


 



Go to page: First ... 11 12 13 14 [15] 16 17 18 19 ... Last