Please wait...
0 files
Subject: Re: What are the system requirments for citadel?
Also will Ubuntu work?, what are your recommended Os's i Use?
Ubuntu will work just fine. We build on Debian so anything in that family will be "native". And if you're using the Docker version then it'll bring its own libraries so it really doesn't matter.
Greetings everyone.
I installed and have been running Citadel for almost 12 months now - running on Ubuntu 20.04-LTS.
Today we have really serious winds which took out power 3 times. Now since that when I get new mail it arrives in the inbox, however only the list of mail received
and not the message itself.
I have done the database recovery thing and it seemed to complete ok ie. no error messages.
I seem to have lost all of this years mail.
Other specific mail boxes such as archive etc seem to be ok.
Any suggestions?
Cheers and thanks
Frank
Subject: Screwed up install - addendum
Ok,
So the message reading pane does not show for any currently received message,
not sure where I could read the message directly on ubuntu to see if its actually there or not.
hope you can help
Cheers
Frank
Any suggestions?
Restore your most recent backup.
Would it be possible to configure user access to segregate access between licensed radio amateurs (AX.25) and normal SSH/Telnet users within Citadel?
Basically have a need to keep non-licensed users from access the AX.25 resources.
CD
Would love to hear more about your setup because Citadel has been used before with amateur radio with great success.
Hello! I have installed with Active Directory and it syncs and works fine, however none of the users are admin. on the website it says the first user to be made it supposed to be admin, but i guess that wasn't the case with my install. what do i do??
an update, i've installed again on a fresh install and the same issue happens. ubuntu 20.04. i dont think its an issue with AD so much as it looks like the script doesn't listen when it asks you what the admin user is. the default is "admin" and after hitting enter, it doesn't look like that value changes. my admin user isn't called admin, for security obfuscation. thus, i get completely locked out. looks like i need to install a 3rd time, having created a user "admin" in my AD database and use that to give my admin user privilages, then delete that account. i hope the bug gets fixed!
it doesn't seem to work even with that. it just wont see the admin account. i really need help here, setting this up.
- Afrikaans
- Albanisch
- Amharisch
- Arabisch
- Armenisch
- Aserbaidschanisch
- Bengalisch
- Birmanisch
- Bulgarisch
- Chinesisch (traditionell)
- Chinesisch (vereinfacht)
- Deutsch
- Dänisch
- Englisch
- Estnisch
- Finnisch
- Französisch
- Griechisch
- Gujarati
- Haitianisch
- Hebräisch
- Hindi
- Indonesisch
- Isländisch
- Italienisch
- Japanisch
- Kannada
- Kasachisch
- Katalanisch
- Khmer
- Koreanisch
- Kroatisch
- Kurdisch (kurmandschi)
- Lao
- Lettisch
- Litauisch
- Malagasy
- Malayalam
- Malaysisch
- Maltesisch
- Maori
- Marathi
- Nepalesisch
- Niederländisch
- Norwegisch
- Paschtu
- Persisch
- Polnisch
- Portugiesisch
- Punjabi
- Rumänisch
- Russisch
- Samoanisch
- Schwedisch
- Slowakisch
- Slowenisch
- Spanisch
- Tamil
- Telugu
- Thailändisch
- Tschechisch
- Türkisch
- Ukrainisch
- Ungarisch
- Urdu
- Vietnamesisch
- Walisisch
I solved my issue. it was just weird how it would autocreate the admin user even if i wasn't using it and it doesn't exist anywhere, but the real issue is that i needed to enter my full name. now my issue is that users are logging in and recieving bad email accounts... if you want to email me its "FirstName MiddleName LastName@example.tld" and that's not too awesome since we are hoping for and expecting "username@example.tld" ... is there any way i can edit the AD for this? i want to use sAMaccountName@example.tld instead of givenName middleName lastName@example.tld for each account. otherwise, i either can't use email reciving (which is why we're using this, but also the XMPP and other features make it amazing) or i have to create an alias for every user manually... which in all honesty i dont know how yet.
LastName@example.tld" and that's not too awesome since we are hoping
for and expecting "username@example.tld" ... is there any way i can
edit the AD for this? i want to use sAMaccountName@example.tld
You can edit each user's email addresses and aliases from inside Citadel.
It doesn't have to pull it from AD. Most sites don'
t want it to.
Subject: This message does not pass authentication checks (SPF and DKIM both )
I keep getting this message when trying to send an email This message does not pass authentication checks (SPF and DKIM both )
Subject: Re: This message does not pass authentication checks (SPF and DKIM both )
Hello,
My Citserver stopped listening on port 25. If I change the SMTP port to 2525 it will listen on that port.
Where are the log files and how can I set the level of logging for debugging? Where are the startup parameters stored? Are they in the database?
Thanks!
Mark
the citadel server posts "New user account <> has been created, from host []." every few minutes as message in the aide room. this is causing severe spam as i'm getting a message every few minutes. i assume this isn't supposed to happen but i dont know whats wrong.
- Afrikaans
- Albanisch
- Amharisch
- Arabisch
- Armenisch
- Aserbaidschanisch
- Bengalisch
- Birmanisch
- Bulgarisch
- Chinesisch (traditionell)
- Chinesisch (vereinfacht)
- Deutsch
- Dänisch
- Englisch
- Estnisch
- Finnisch
- Französisch
- Griechisch
- Gujarati
- Haitianisch
- Hebräisch
- Hindi
- Indonesisch
- Isländisch
- Italienisch
- Japanisch
- Kannada
- Kasachisch
- Katalanisch
- Khmer
- Koreanisch
- Kroatisch
- Kurdisch (kurmandschi)
- Lao
- Lettisch
- Litauisch
- Malagasy
- Malayalam
- Malaysisch
- Maltesisch
- Maori
- Marathi
- Nepalesisch
- Niederländisch
- Norwegisch
- Paschtu
- Persisch
- Polnisch
- Portugiesisch
- Punjabi
- Rumänisch
- Russisch
- Samoanisch
- Schwedisch
- Slowakisch
- Slowenisch
- Spanisch
- Tamil
- Telugu
- Thailändisch
- Tschechisch
- Türkisch
- Ukrainisch
- Ungarisch
- Urdu
- Vietnamesisch
- Walisisch
Subject: Re: Debugging Citserver not listening on port 25
if you're using debian linux, the system by default has a postfix server running for internal user mailboxes within the system itself. run "service postfix stop" and disable it with systemctl... then see if it listens.
Subject: Re: Debugging Citserver not listening on port 25
My Citserver stopped listening on port 25. If I change the SMTP port to 2525 it will listen on that port.
Where are the log files and how can I set the level of logging for debugging? Where are the startup parameters stored? Are they in the database?
Does something else answer on port 25? If you do "ss -ltn" does something else show on port 25?
Startup parameters are in /etc/systemd/system/citadel.service and you can adjust whatever you need, or you can start up citserver manually with "-x9" for maximum debugging.
the citadel server posts "New user account <> has been created, from host []." every few minutes as message in the aide room. this is causing severe spam as i'm getting a message every few minutes. i assume this isn't supposed to happen but i dont know whats wrong.
Obviously it shouldn't be doing that. I wonder if you could run citserver in the foreground (shut down the service and then run citserver -x9) and then catch a few screenfuls of logging while that problem is happening. Maybe it would show the source of those messages.
Hi All! I just installed CITADEL on my CentOS7 webserver and was pleased to see it install quickly.
first installer run failed with 'couldn't create /usr/local/citadel/ but after i manually created that, it all just breezed thru.
this is development server and its already running webs on port 80 ( apache) so I installed to a different port.
I located the existing letsencrypt key and cert files for the hostname domain and copied them to /usr/local/citadel/keys/ and then renamed them citadel.key and citadel.cer
restarted everything and now i can get a secure page to the WebCit interface. Its working fine, sending and receiving mails on both the domains I specified. Very nice!
The one thing I want to clear up is when i do a mail server test over at mxtoolbox.com it passes everything BUT reports "Warning - Does not support TLS." ( Your SMTP email server does advertise support for TLS. After connecting to your mail server we issue an EHLO command to introduce ourselves and to request that your server announce which commands and protocols it supports. Your server's response did not include "250-STARTTLS" indicating TLS support. )
What do I need to do to get the citadel server connections encrypted? I haven't found that in the docs online yet. TIA!
Hi All! I just installed CITADEL on my CentOS7 webserver and was pleased to see it install quickly.
first installer run failed with 'couldn't create /usr/local/citadel/ but after i manually created that, it all just breezed thru.
this is development server and its already running webs on port 80 ( apache) so I installed to a different port.
I located the existing letsencrypt key and cert files for the hostname domain and copied them to /usr/local/citadel/keys/ and then renamed them citadel.key and citadel.cer
restarted everything and now i can get a secure page to the WebCit interface. Its working fine, sending and receiving mails on both the domains I specified. Very nice!
The one thing I want to clear up is when i do a mail server test over at mxtoolbox.com it passes everything BUT reports "Warning - Does not support TLS." ( Your SMTP email server does advertise support for TLS. After connecting to your mail server we issue an EHLO command to introduce ourselves and to request that your server announce which commands and protocols it supports. Your server's response did not include "250-STARTTLS" indicating TLS support. )
What do I need to do to get the citadel server connections encrypted? I haven't found that in the docs online yet. TIA!
PS: Interestingly, if i check the details of mails sent from my CITADEL to gmail, gmail reports that they are encrypted just fine, with standard encryption ( (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); ).
Not sure why mxtoolbox "fails" the test, it always used to pass that when i was running Postfix on this box...