Well, that was my thought. But as mentioned earlier - I tend to assume the least of you who are longtimers here are are 10x my skill - so I always assume there is something I've missed.
The noobz who show up here, I tend to feel superior to. But the rest of you - I just assume I'm the new kid who showed up at a local with people who've been showing up for a decade before I arrived.
Seems a safe bet.
Wed May 06 2026 09:18:25 EDT from Nurb432Not sure how you could not notice if all the passwords were changed.. He could easily see if people were logging in recently.. he had to know it would not fly under the radar.
The current hotness is CVE-2026-31431, known as "copy fail", along with some related exploits.
You have to already be a local user, and then you can do some things to gain root access. It's pretty significant, but you have to already be logged in as a regular user to exploit it. It doesn't expose itself on the wire.
But if you expose any services, and if they have any remote execution holes... ( and a lot of things do )
Sat May 09 2026 11:59:35 EDT from IGnatius T FoobarThe current hotness is CVE-2026-31431, known as "copy fail", along with some related exploits.
You have to already be a local user, and then you can do some things to gain root access. It's pretty significant, but you have to already be logged in as a regular user to exploit it. It doesn't expose itself on the wire.
I forget where i posted it ( search would be great. hint hint :) ) But the new 'apple lease' program is even worse than it sounds.
A friend of mine sent the official documentation. ( attached instead of copy paste a bunch of garbage ). the TLDR; is that you are basically renting, its not yours, at all, and if you even so much as think of sneezing the wrong direction, you violate the lease and get fined and they brick the device.
The sad thing is that whenever Apple makes a retarded decision, like removing headphone jacks or USB-A ports or making notched and curved screens, all the other companies mock Apple for it, but then within a few years copy all of Apple's bad design choices.
I was ok with going to USBc in stead of A as those adapters are trivial, but yes in general i agree. And ya, removing headphone jack is stupid on phones. Yes, adapters exist but its more bulk. And of course no port = BT mandated which i'm not a fan of on a daily basis. I like wire. One reason i liked my xiaomi phones. USB, audio, IR, even a SD slot.. My current e-ink one, no SD, but at least i got my jack back ( pixel didn't have one. but i told that story of why i switched to one )
Apple also dropped HDMI ports at one point on laptops. Also damned annoying. ( might be back i donno )
Sat Aug 01 2026 10:40:18 EDT from SouthernComputerGeekThe sad thing is that whenever Apple makes a retarded decision, like removing headphone jacks or USB-A ports or making notched and curved screens, all the other companies mock Apple for it, but then within a few years copy all of Apple's bad design choices.
Fear not, the eurotrash regulators are making Apple and others build phones with replaceable batteries and standard USB-C and 3.5 mm ports.
And the manufacturers don't want to build multiple variants of each device so we all benefit.
Truth.
Sat Aug 01 2026 10:40:18 EDT from SouthernComputerGeekThe sad thing is that whenever Apple makes a retarded decision, like removing headphone jacks or USB-A ports or making notched and curved screens, all the other companies mock Apple for it, but then within a few years copy all of Apple's bad design choices.
I wont hold my breath. More like they will have 2 models, and raise cost of ours over here.
Sat Aug 01 2026 20:55:16 EDT from IGnatius T FoobarFear not, the eurotrash regulators are making Apple and others build phones with replaceable batteries and standard USB-C and 3.5 mm ports.
And the manufacturers don't want to build multiple variants of each device so we all benefit.
They normally don't. That's the point. It costs them more to maintain multiple lines.
Look around at most phones for example, the regional versions are all just the same case and computer but with the radios running at different frequency bands. And I'm sure even that is just some sort of fuse set that's customized at the end of the factory line for different regions.
2026-08-01 12:46 from Nurb432SD
I was ok with going to USBc in stead of A as those adapters are
trivial, but yes in general i agree. And ya, removing headphone jack is
stupid on phones. Yes, adapters exist but its more bulk. And of course
no port = BT mandated which i'm not a fan of on a daily basis. I like
wire. One reason i liked my xiaomi phones. USB, audio, IR, even a
slot.. My current e-ink one, no SD, but at least i got my jack back (Removing headphone jacks is a good decision, if your goal is to sell USB-to-jack adapters to your customers afterwards. There is a reason why budget IT products in poor countries still come with a jack while sophisticated versions they sell in the US and Europe come with USB-A only: in a poor country nobody is going to dump 7 USD for a USB-to-jack adapter.
pixel didn't have one. but i told that story of why i switched to one
)
Sure, for THEM, but not us people who still like to use 'real' earphones at times. I still feel they sound better as well.
Dont have a crippled one with USBA, they all have audio out, so donno if it would work, but i might try ti sometime just to see. I do have a usbA to audio somewhere around here. i bought it due to never getting drivers to work on the Office macbook for the native audio.. I do have a crippled USBC phone that ONLY charges. it cant even be hooked to a PC to transfer files, so they do exist.. ( long story.. total scam device, but it was cheap enough i figured worth the risk .. But its got an analog port and BT so few people would need to try that )
Tue Aug 25 2026 13:39:31 EDT from darknetuserRemoving headphone jacks is a good decision, if your goal is to sell USB-to-jack adapters to your customers afterwards. There is a reason why budget IT products in poor countries still come with a jack while sophisticated versions they sell in the US and Europe come with USB-A only: in a poor country nobody is going to dump 7 USD for a USB-to-jack adapter.
Removing headphone jacks is a good decision, if your goal is to sell
USB-to-jack adapters to your customers afterwards. There is a reason
Their excuse was that it makes the phone less water resistant.
This is of course nonsense, because both USB and 3.5mm jacks that go into phones are now designed to be water resistant between the inside and outside of the jack body. My current phone (a "motorola" G) maintains its IPwhatever rating even with a USB jack, a 3.5mm headphone jack, and a stylus holder.
The big culprit is Apple. It's always Apple. And frankly anyone who has the $$$ to waste on a lifestyle brand deserves whatever they get.
I have a pair of "native usb" earbuds that we bought in a pinch while traveling.
They cost $6 at Buc-ees. That's less than the cost of their brisket sandwich.
They sound ok, but they consume the USB port so you can't charge and listen at the same time. Lose lose lose.
But often times it trickles down to the rest of us with non-apple products, "let apple test the waters, if it doesn't cause mass exodus, then we will do it too"
Thu Aug 27 2026 19:30:48 EDT from IGnatius T FoobarAnd frankly anyone who has the $$$ to waste on a lifestyle brand deserves whatever they get.
You know what's kind of neat? "USB earbuds" have the Bluetrum AB13X usb-audio chip right in the plug. It's the size of a grain of rice and can be bought for about USD$0.15 in bulk reels. I think that's incredible. Then I found out that the exact same chip is in my 4-port KVM. Four of them, in fact.
They're getting to be almost universal for both disposable and durable hardware.
And with the correct passive components, this chip sounds good. Driving my amplifier it is full fidelity. In a $6 pair of earbuds built to the lowest cost, not all that good. But it's fun to see.