Please wait...
[#]
Mon May 11 2015 14:30:32 UTC
from
<>
Subject: Fiorina answers NBC's website flap questions by snapping up 'ChuckTodd.org'
After Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina was questioned on NBC's "Meet the Press" by host Chuck Todd about a cyber-squatter snapping up www.carlyfiorina.org and using it as a forum to slam Fiorina’s record at Hewlett-Packard, Fiorina answered back.
http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/politics/~3/Hted5LxJXVw/
http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/politics/~3/Hted5LxJXVw/
[#]
Mon May 11 2015 15:58:08 UTC
from
vince-q <vince-q@ns1.netk2ne.net>
Subject: Re: Fiorina answers NBC's website flap questions by snapping up 'ChuckTodd.org'
2015-05-11 07:30 from @cascade in >
Subject: Fiorina answers NBC's website flap questions by snapping up 'ChuckTodd.org'
After Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina was questioned
on NBC's "Meet the Press" by host Chuck Todd about a cyber-squatter
snapping up www.carlyfiorina.org and using it as a forum to slam
Fiorina’s record at Hewlett-Packard, Fiorina answered back.
http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/politics/~3/Hted5LxJXVw/
This one is a 'must read' - copy/paste the URL if you are using the text client. Hysterical!!!
fleeb - how about if instead of just squatting, they do something entertaining,
funny, relevant and irreverent with the site and just refuse to give up the
site name?
-Ari
-Ari
I'm okay with that, aahz.
Mostly because it involves effort, so you're actually contributing something.
It takes time, which in term requires some money, etc. You are creating something.
(And it suggests you can't just whimsically do this for thousands of people you hate to spread misery... you have to focus your efforts and sustain them).
fleeb - how about if instead of just squatting, they do something
entertaining, funny, relevant and irreverent with the site and just
refuse to give up the site name?
Yes. That.
The original owners of PETA.ORG were a group called "People Eating Tasty Animals"
At that time, the site was funny, irreverant, entertaining, and still managed to make some good points.
Later on, they were lawyer-bullied into giving up their domain name. A hypercommunist hate group called People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals took over the domain, and to this day are using it to distribute their hate and propaganda.
Yeah, but again, it involved effort.
What that one person is doing is directing traffic for one destination to another, involving no effort, and undermining the point of DNS; to make it easier to find the content you seek.
To a logical extreme, if people snatched up DNS entries and redirected them to seemingly-random places, one would have to come up with a collection of character unthought-of to have a DNS presence on the internet. One may as well use IP addresses at that point, if you're forced to use something like atjdisjels.com as the DNS for your website because everything is redirected to anything from cute kittens to runny feces.
I don't mind if you choose to take a DNS and do something amusing with it... but that isn't what she's doing. She's being a bitch.
Uhhh ... what happened to the last 14 months of messages in this room? I don't remember hiring Hillary Clinton to do my server maintenance.
Now I've got to figure out whether this is related to the database repair I did over the weekend or if some misbehaving user-agent on my part did it.
Well, it's not as if we lost a lot of meaningful discussion anyway. I'll summarize the election discussion so far:
* Hitlery Cunton == 100% evil, 100% globalist, deserves to die slowly (but before November) and painfully.
* Bernie Sanders == batshit insane
* Ted Cruz == the second coming of George W. Bush, 100% owned and operated by Goldman Sachs
* Donald Trump == our next president in any scenario not involving the final destruction of the United States as we know it.
Damn, I was hoping I just woke up from a terrible nightmare that Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders were running for President and people like Hillary enough to make her the nominee.
You mean it wasn't just a horrible dream?
Nope.
Best comment I've heard since Bernie Sanders revealed himself to be the Ted Cruz of the democrats by endorsing Hitlery:
"When small grassroots donors and Goldman Sachs finally team up for the greater good, they're #StrongerTogether!"
Best comment I've heard since Bernie Sanders revealed himself to be the Ted Cruz of the democrats by endorsing Hitlery:
"When small grassroots donors and Goldman Sachs finally team up for the greater good, they're #StrongerTogether!"
Thu Jul 14 2016 09:16:40 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ UncensoredNope.
Best comment I've heard since Bernie Sanders revealed himself to be the Ted Cruz of the democrats by endorsing Hitlery:
"When small grassroots donors and Goldman Sachs finally team up for the greater good, they're #StrongerTogether!"
Except Bernie said from the start that he would endorse her if she won enough delegates.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/bernie-sanders-hillary-clinton_us_5706fbbde4b03a9e75d3fd93
Even back in April he was saying so.
"“Sure I will,” he said, when pressed by CBS News’ Charlie Rose in an interview. “Look, as I said a million times, I think the idea of a Donald Trump or a Ted Cruz presidency would be an unmitigated disaster for this country. I will do everything in my power and work as hard as I can to make sure that that does not happen. And if Secretary Clinton is the nominee, I will certainly support her.”"
Well, there's Bernie and then there's Bernie supporters. I don't think they
recall him saying that, all they heard was "free everything" and "riot" and
"legal pot"
If all they wanted was a democrat plus legalized pot, they could vote for the Libertarian Party. That's essentially all they really are. That's essentially why I stopped voting for them. Even though I'm in favor of drug legalization, the LP just isn't a pragmatic vehicle for libertarian politics.
Although I do wish I could rescind my vote for Mitt Bush Cruz Romney. What an asshole that guy turned out to be.
If all they wanted was a democrat plus legalized pot, they could vote for the Libertarian Party. That's essentially all they really are. That's essentially why I stopped voting for them. Even though I'm in favor of drug legalization, the LP just isn't a pragmatic vehicle for libertarian politics.
Although I do wish I could rescind my vote for Mitt Bush Cruz Romney. What an asshole that guy turned out to be.