You do have a right to record what can be seen from off-property, that is, what is visible to someone standing on the property line.  That is the limit of recording rights when it comes to private property.  Free speech rights may have been violated, or maybe not.  I don't have details necessary to make that determination.

Sat Nov 25 2023 20:00:58 EST from Nurb432

Guy gets arrested for recording video on private property.  Media is screaming 'free speech rights violated'. No, you dont have that on private property. Really most of your rights vanish on private property. I'm sure they will next say 'it had public access' .. so? that is meaningless too.

While may have been doing it for a good cause, ( wont get into subject, not the point ) he wont win in court. He violated law ( trespassing for one, since its posted no recording, perhaps more )

Yes. but that isn't the case this was an enclosed private building, and posted no photographs. Dude walking round IN the building filming.. . Of course  outside 'bleed over' is allowed, as long as its not abused. 

Sun Nov 26 2023 12:44:25 EST from LadySerenaKitty

You do have a right to record what can be seen from off-property, that is, what is visible to someone standing on the property line.  That is the limit of recording rights when it comes to private property.  Free speech rights may have been violated, or maybe not.  I don't have details necessary to make that determination.

Sat Nov 25 2023 20:00:58 EST from Nurb432

Guy gets arrested for recording video on private property.  Media is screaming 'free speech rights violated'. No, you dont have that on private property. Really most of your rights vanish on private property. I'm sure they will next say 'it had public access' .. so? that is meaningless too.

While may have been doing it for a good cause, ( wont get into subject, not the point ) he wont win in court. He violated law ( trespassing for one, since its posted no recording, perhaps more )

 

Oh yea, no right to record in that case.

Sun Nov 26 2023 13:08:36 EST from Nurb432

Yes. but that isn't the case this was an enclosed private building, and posted no photographs. Dude walking round IN the building filming.. . Of course  outside 'bleed over' is allowed, as long as its not abused. 

So Ireland is going to outlaw even the possession of 'hate speech'.   So if you have an old book, you get to go to jail and have your book burned. I wonder if you just 'think hate speech' do they plan to erase your brain?   I can see 'hate speech' being the official excuse to destroy our history. Tho that process has already started, with statues and things, it will accelerate to actual written records and knowledge.         

Man, this world sucks. I really didnt want to be around to witness the collapse.  

might be under politics too, if so, sorry.

Didn't go out looking for his sources, but hes always been solid. 

The piece i'm bring up here: DOJ demanded every single person on twitter that interacted with Trumps account at all. Even a simple like.. Every. Single One.  I guess twitter refused at first ( so ill give them a point ) then was fined 350k. and court demanded it, so they complied ..    And while i realize twitter is not free speech and is a private company, government swooping in and getting involved like this violates free speech.

~1:20 into it    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCU8GfNm0Lg