Please wait...
You can't claim to care about Hillary shredding the constitution when Trump is on the record stating he's willing to go beyond all that you could claim she would, Ig.
Ahhh.. here we go again... part of the "if you say X, you lose the right to say Y" solution brigade.
Wed Jul 20 2016 15:12:17 EDT from LoanShark @ Uncensored
Ahhh.. here we go again... part of the "if you say X, you lose the right to say Y" solution brigade.
I'm still waiting for that reply of a collection of links that support the argument that she is "Hitllery"... If you're not willing to provide sources, cites, anything that supports your statements, then, yes, you really haven't added anything to this topic at all. All you've done is whine and post misogynistic ah hom remarks.
Show me a link where Hillary went on record saying she wants to drop nukes, seize foreign oil fields and 'take', wants to find more painful ways to execute people, says the Geneva Convention is a problem and wants to encourage torture, would declare World War as president and uses white power/nazi images in ads for her campaign...
And then maybe I'll think calling her a female Hitler might have -some- weight.
As it stands, it currently does not.
Yes. Trump is worse than Hillary.
Prove that he isn't.
Your turn.
One cannot prove this, but it 'is' in the same sense that Mount Everest 'is', or that Alma Cogan 'isn't'.
Wed Jul 20 2016 15:40:52 EDT from LoanShark @ Uncensored
One cannot prove this, but it 'is' in the same sense that Mount Everest 'is', or that Alma Cogan 'isn't'.
In other words, you're too lazy to do anything other than troll. Gotcha.
Trump would not be the nominee if it weren't for Democrats voting for him.
They felt he was the easist to defeat.
In other words, you're too lazy to do anything other than troll.
Gotcha.
You're too lazy to get to know the people you're bitching at, or to work on your reading comprehension. (Hint: LS != IG.)
Wanna call me a troll? Fuck you.
2016-07-20 16:06 from Ragnar Danneskjold @uncnsrd
fleeb - the only voting laws I see that need to be reformed to to end
open primaries. We have too many cross-over voters trying to spoil the
other sides chances.
I disagree.
Our current system of voting encourages a two party system that eventually leads to what we have now.
Would you rather vote for someone you sincerely believe in, someone you honestly feel would be good for the country, or would you rather vote for someone because you're forced into thinking about a strategy of voting where the least bad person (in your opinion) can get in office to keep the really bad person out?
I'd rather vote for who I think would do a great job. And I haven't seen that... ever, I guess.
I do not know what the best system of voting would be, but I know there are better systems than what we have.
If we write a number beside the three candidates we liked best, and when a candidate you prefer loses, the next in your priority is applied, until all candidates are either exhausted or form a majority, we'd have a better system than what we have now.
Ahhh.. here we go again... part of the "if you say X, you lose the right to say Y" solution brigade.
X! Y! X!! Y!!! X!!! Y!!!!
Wed Jul 20 2016 03:03:08 PM EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ UncensoredAs far as pessimistic outcomes, I can see two:1. Cuntbag wins the election (via cheating, of course). Constitution shredded.
2. Trump wins the election (by a landslide, but due to democrat cheating it comes out as a squeaker) ... but is blocked by liberals in both parties of Congress from accomplishing his agenda.
1) Let's see, Liberals say that a republican president will shred the Constitution and Conservatives say a democrat will shred the Constitution.
2) So you are saying that both parties are controlled by one group of people making it one party?
Wed Jul 20 2016 04:06:47 PM EDT from Ragnar Danneskjold @ UncensoredTrump would not be the nominee if it weren't for Democrats voting for him.
Meh, I have heard of far too many registered republicans bragging how they only register republican to phuque up the primary and will always vote democrat in the main election. The primary system isn't the problem. The party system is the problem.
How about instant-runoff voting? No parties, just people and their platform.
Wed Jul 20 2016 02:32:49 PM EDT from LoanShark @ Uncensored
The Wall(TM) is now an official plank of the party platform! (Which is ridiculous.)
It doesn't go far enough, of course. To prevent a terrorist from landing a stolen plane in the Canadian wilderness and slipping across the border, you need to build a wall on the entire 49th parallel, including all those mountains...
Is it terrorists or just Messakins?
Wed Jul 20 2016 16:35:32 EDT from LoanShark @ UncensoredIn other words, you're too lazy to do anything other than troll.You're too lazy to get to know the people you're bitching at, or to work on your reading comprehension. (Hint: LS != IG.)
Gotcha.
Wanna call me a troll? Fuck you.
I figure when two names make the same lazy mistakes, I can address the both of you with one post. Public forums tend to work that way, y'know.
You only responded to me with dismissive remarks instead of, you know... actually providing anything to the topic. I outlined, in significant detail, the many issues with Trump. The response? In effect, either "Hitlery" or "Yeah, whatever." Sorry, I'm going to need to see at least a fraction of the effort I made in response to my post for me to consider it anything other than snide trolling.
It takes an astounding amount of willful ignorance to say "I support Trump" while attacking Hillary for many of the same things Trump has been caught doing.... AND ignoring all the worse things he has done on top of that.
I painfully outlined why Trump is a bad candidate. Now do the same for Hillary and prove that Trump is better than her. Either you or someone else. I don't care who.
You only responded to me with dismissive remarks instead of, you
Anybody who demands "proof" of a political *OPINION* the way you did, richly deserves dismissive remarks, regardless of the right and wrong of it.
*Hint again*: LS != IG. A actually lean towards Hillary.
But you, sir, are acting like a bloody frickin' idiot.
rat fink, ruggie man, you haven't been here long enough to go on the attack. you don't know our in-jokes.
so sit in the corner and lurk and chill for a while.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/21/us/politics/donald-trump-issues.html
Ferfucksake. This person *must not* become commander in chief.
So, how about that big speech last night by Ted Bush Cruz? The crowd was chanting "Endorse Trump!" and he not only didn't do it, but also made another snide remark about New Yorkers. He was *literally* booed off the stage. He's really ruining any chances of any future runs by acting this way.