Language:

en_US

switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 21 22 23 24 [25]
[#] Fri Dec 20 2024 15:45:08 UTC from darknetuser

Subject: Re: More explosions please

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

2024-12-18 21:25 from IGnatius T Foobar
Subject: More explosions please
I want a remake of "Speed" (1994) that only runs for about 20 minutes

because the bus blows up and everyone dies. Howard Payne is, after

all, justified: people suck and all deserve to get blown up.


I don't remember watching that movie. Is the original any good?

These days I only watch very old stuff when left on my own. When in a group they will have me watch new stuff and I find it okeish but not that good.


The last Star Wars trilogy, for example, I am watching it with friends and it kind of sucks. The first movie was a ripoff from A New Hope straight, scept it was worse made.

[#] Fri Dec 20 2024 23:31:14 UTC from zelgomer

Subject: Re: More explosions please

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

2024-12-20 15:45 from darknetuser <darknetuser@uncensored.citadel.org>

Subject: Re: More explosions please
2024-12-18 21:25 from IGnatius T Foobar
Subject: More explosions please
I want a remake of "Speed" (1994) that only runs for about 20 minutes



because the bus blows up and everyone dies. Howard Payne is, after



all, justified: people suck and all deserve to get blown up.


I don't remember watching that movie. Is the original any good?


"Good?" No. Entertaining? Yes.

[#] Mon Dec 23 2024 00:14:51 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Re: More explosions please

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

It was fun at the time.  I'm not sure it would sustain the lowered attention span of a modern-day viewer.

Really I just want to see things explode.



[#] Mon Dec 23 2024 01:35:49 UTC from zelgomer

Subject: Re: More explosions please

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I want to see Sandra Bullock take her shirt off.

[#] Mon Dec 23 2024 17:32:28 UTC from darknetuser

Subject: Re: More explosions please

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

"Good?" No. Entertaining? Yes.



Well, that works for me. I am not known for being picky. My Bollywood collection is evidence enough.

[#] Fri Dec 27 2024 22:28:47 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Now I have a machine gun. Ho-Ho-Ho.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Normally, if someone claims that Die Hard is not a Christmas movie, I will immediately consign them to the eleventh circle of hell reserved for the most blasphemous and horrible people in the universe.

But someone actually gave me a good reason why one might not consider Die Hard to be a Christmas movie:

Quite simply ... it doesn't have Jesus in it.

I like that thinking. I hate anything Christmas-related that doesn't have Jesus in it.

Ho-ho-ho.

[#] Mon Dec 30 2024 01:30:36 UTC from zelgomer

Subject: Re: Now I have a machine gun. Ho-Ho-Ho.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Quite simply ... it doesn't have Jesus in it.


Neither did the original Christmas, bud.

[#] Mon Dec 30 2024 01:37:29 UTC from Nurb432

Subject: Re: Now I have a machine gun. Ho-Ho-Ho.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

true story

Mon Dec 30 2024 01:30:36 UTC from zelgomer Subject: Re: Now I have a machine gun. Ho-Ho-Ho.
Quite simply ... it doesn't have Jesus in it.


Neither did the original Christmas, bud.

 



[#] Mon Dec 30 2024 17:01:00 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Re: Now I have a machine gun. Ho-Ho-Ho.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

You mean Saturnalia? Yeah, that had no Jesus in it. It's pretty well documented that the early Christians decided to have their annual remembrance of the birth of Jesus during a time when the oppressive pagans were too busy being drunk and screwing each other to persecute the Christians. Most Biblical historians believe the actual event was likely to have happened during the season we now know as Spring.

The pagans took back the season a long time ago. That's one reason I'm ok with letting it rot.

Go to page: First ... 21 22 23 24 [25]