Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 ... Last
[#] Fri Sep 01 2017 12:10:54 EDT from s3cr3to @ Uncensored to Citadel_Support <room_Citadel_Support@uncensored.citadel.org>

Subject: Re: Feature or security issue ....

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

And an evil browser addon can read the source code of the page and
harvest the user/password. yikes! Or a malware/trojan can be running
just waiting for temporary cached pages. This can be ugly.

Time to learn how to manage our user accounts from the terminal client.
And leave the browser for this tasks?

This is version 8.17

On 09/01/2017 09:23 AM, Freakdog wrote:
Another question would be:

* In which version of Citadel and Webcit are you noting this behavior?

[#] Fri Sep 01 2017 22:37:24 EDT from Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II

Subject: Re: Feature or security issue ....

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Fri Sep 01 2017 12:10:54 PM EDT from s3cr3to @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Feature or security issue ....
And an evil browser addon can read the source code of the page and
harvest the user/password. yikes! Or a malware/trojan can be running
just waiting for temporary cached pages. This can be ugly.

Time to learn how to manage our user accounts from the terminal client.
And leave the browser for this tasks?

This is version 8.17

On 09/01/2017 09:23 AM, Freakdog wrote:
Another question would be:

* In which version of Citadel and Webcit are you noting this behavior?

8.17 is pretty old, at this point.

I'm not saying that the issue won't surface if you do so, but I recommend upgrading to the latest release.



[#] Fri Sep 01 2017 23:09:55 EDT from elixx @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Feature or security issue ....

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I can confirm this behaviour with the easy-install build of 9.11.

Fri Sep 01 2017 11:23:34 EDT from Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II Subject: Re: Feature or security issue ....

Another question would be:

  • In which version of Citadel and Webcit are you noting this behavior?


 



[#] Sun Sep 03 2017 11:38:04 EDT from bennabiy @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Feature or security issue ....

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

It must be with local authentication, as my LDAP install does not reflect this.

Fri Sep 01 2017 11:09:55 PM EDT from elixx @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Feature or security issue ....

I can confirm this behaviour with the easy-install build of 9.11.

Fri Sep 01 2017 11:23:34 EDT from Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II Subject: Re: Feature or security issue ....

Another question would be:

  • In which version of Citadel and Webcit are you noting this behavior?


 



 



[#] Sat Sep 09 2017 09:17:07 EDT from Apox @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Easy install problem

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi Support,

does anybody know how to resolve such compilation error?

 

modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:637:23: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'SSL {aka struct ssl_st}'
  BIO_set_close(CC->ssl->rbio, BIO_NOCLOSE);

zlib and zlibdev are installed.

Thanks

Alain

 

Tue Aug 29 2017 14:04:22 EDT from apox13 @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Easy install problem

Thanks for replay!

Now I have an other compilation error, found anything on the web or forum about:

 

modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:147:22: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'DH {aka struct dh_st}'
  if (!(BN_hex2bn(&(dh->p), DH_P))) {
                      ^~
modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:173:3: warning: 'RSA_generate_key' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
   rsa = RSA_generate_key(1024, /* modulus size */
   ^~~
In file included from /usr/include/openssl/rsa.h:13:0,
                 from /usr/include/openssl/x509.h:31,
                 from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:50,
                 from modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:20:
/usr/include/openssl/rsa.h:193:1: note: declared here
 DEPRECATEDIN_0_9_8(RSA *RSA_generate_key(int bits, unsigned long e, void
 ^
modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:305:35: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'X509_REQ {aka struct X509_req_st}'
      X509_set_issuer_name(cer, req->req_info->subject);
                                   ^~
In file included from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:48:0,
                 from modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:20:
modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c: In function 'CtdlStartTLS':
modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:637:23: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'SSL {aka struct ssl_st}'
  BIO_set_close(CC->ssl->rbio, BIO_NOCLOSE);
                       ^
At top level:
modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:61:22: warning: 'id_callback' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 static unsigned long id_callback(void)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~
Makefile:145: recipe for target 'modules/crypto/serv_crypto.o' failed
make: *** [modules/crypto/serv_crypto.o] Error 1
Operating system: Linux Debian 9.1 ( 4.9.0-3-686-pae i686)

 

Many thanks

Alain

 

Sun Aug 27 2017 15:45:05 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Easy install problem
lib/stringbuf.c:2846:2: error: unknown type name 'z_stream'
  z_stream zstream;
  ^~~~~~~~

Install zlib and zlib-devel (or zlib-dev). That should fix the build.

 



 



[#] Sun Sep 10 2017 10:41:29 EDT from bennabiy @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Easy install problem

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Did you install every dependency listed on the website as listed prerequisites for easy install?

Sat Sep 09 2017 09:17:07 AM EDT from Apox @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Easy install problem

Hi Support,

does anybody know how to resolve such compilation error?

 

modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:637:23: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'SSL {aka struct ssl_st}'
  BIO_set_close(CC->ssl->rbio, BIO_NOCLOSE);

zlib and zlibdev are installed.

Thanks

Alain

 

Tue Aug 29 2017 14:04:22 EDT from apox13 @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Easy install problem

Thanks for replay!

Now I have an other compilation error, found anything on the web or forum about:

 

modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:147:22: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'DH {aka struct dh_st}'
  if (!(BN_hex2bn(&(dh->p), DH_P))) {
                      ^~
modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:173:3: warning: 'RSA_generate_key' is deprecated [-Wdeprecated-declarations]
   rsa = RSA_generate_key(1024, /* modulus size */
   ^~~
In file included from /usr/include/openssl/rsa.h:13:0,
                 from /usr/include/openssl/x509.h:31,
                 from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:50,
                 from modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:20:
/usr/include/openssl/rsa.h:193:1: note: declared here
 DEPRECATEDIN_0_9_8(RSA *RSA_generate_key(int bits, unsigned long e, void
 ^
modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:305:35: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'X509_REQ {aka struct X509_req_st}'
      X509_set_issuer_name(cer, req->req_info->subject);
                                   ^~
In file included from /usr/include/openssl/ssl.h:48:0,
                 from modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:20:
modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c: In function 'CtdlStartTLS':
modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:637:23: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type 'SSL {aka struct ssl_st}'
  BIO_set_close(CC->ssl->rbio, BIO_NOCLOSE);
                       ^
At top level:
modules/crypto/serv_crypto.c:61:22: warning: 'id_callback' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
 static unsigned long id_callback(void)
                      ^~~~~~~~~~~
Makefile:145: recipe for target 'modules/crypto/serv_crypto.o' failed
make: *** [modules/crypto/serv_crypto.o] Error 1
Operating system: Linux Debian 9.1 ( 4.9.0-3-686-pae i686)

 

Many thanks

Alain

 

Sun Aug 27 2017 15:45:05 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Easy install problem
lib/stringbuf.c:2846:2: error: unknown type name 'z_stream'
  z_stream zstream;
  ^~~~~~~~

Install zlib and zlib-devel (or zlib-dev). That should fix the build.

 



 



 



[#] Tue Sep 12 2017 09:47:39 EDT from cairtaker @ Uncensored

Subject: Can a calendar be used by all users (how to share a central calendar)

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Sorry for the probably noob question, still getting acquainted with citadel.  Can a calendar be used by all users  so that they can coordinate as a group?



[#] Tue Sep 12 2017 13:34:31 EDT from McKilvain @ Uncensored

Subject: Managing Large Email lists

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Is there a tutorial on how to manage large distributions lists within Citadel? Importing, exporting, etc...



[#] Wed Sep 13 2017 09:41:36 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Can a calendar be used by all users (how to share a central calendar)

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Sorry for the probably noob question, still getting acquainted with
citadel.  Can a calendar be used by all users  so that they can
coordinate as a group?

Yes! Simply create a public or private room with a calendar in it.

[#] Wed Sep 13 2017 10:56:11 EDT from cairtaker @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Can a calendar be used by all users (how to share a central calendar)

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Wed Sep 13 2017 09:41:36 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject: Re: Can a calendar be used by all users (how to share a central calendar)
Sorry for the probably noob question, still getting acquainted with
citadel.  Can a calendar be used by all users  so that they can
coordinate as a group?

Yes! Simply create a public or private room with a calendar in it.

Thank you for the fast response.  Have a great day!



[#] Fri Sep 15 2017 15:01:15 EDT from cjm51213 @ Uncensored

Subject: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi Folks,

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on several fronts. Citadel looks like it might be my answer. Does it support multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will resolve correctly?

Thanks for the help,

Chris.



[#] Fri Sep 15 2017 15:05:25 EDT from cjm51213 @ Uncensored

Subject: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi Folks,

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on several fronts. Does Citadel support multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will resolve correctly?

Thanks for the help,

Chris.



[#] Fri Sep 15 2017 15:09:22 EDT from cjm51213 @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Fri Sep 15 2017 15:01:15 EDT from cjm51213 Subject: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

Hi Folks,

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on several fronts. Citadel looks like it might be my answer. Does it support multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will resolve correctly?

Thanks for the help,

Chris.



Apparently there is no way to delete posts made in error...



[#] Fri Sep 15 2017 15:09:54 EDT from cjm51213 @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Fri Sep 15 2017 15:05:25 EDT from cjm51213 Subject: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

Hi Folks,

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on several fronts. Does Citadel support multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will resolve correctly?

Thanks for the help,

Chris.



Apparently there is no way to delete posts made in error... Sorry.



[#] Fri Sep 15 2017 15:14:57 EDT from cjm51213 @ Uncensored

Subject: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi Folks,

Sorry about the erroneous posts in the Lobby. It took me a bit of time to get oriented.

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on several fronts. Citadel might fit the bill. Does Citadel support multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will resolve correctly?

Assuming Citadel can do what Zimbra can't, how hard will it be to migrate to Citadel, meaning what form of e-mail archive is necessary to import?

Thanks for the help,

Chris.



[#] Sat Sep 16 2017 14:55:03 EDT from Bernhard-72 @ Uncensored

Subject: Log - in Problem after 1st Installation - missing foder

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi all,

Well I really become desperate working on my citadel installation. There is no chance to login on the start page with chrome/firefox or safari. 

 

After installing the suite, I found out, that the folder

/etc/citadel/netconfigs

is missing. Well I can create it myself with the procedure: 

sudo mkdir /etc/citadel/netconfigs

sudo chown citadel:citadel /etc/citadel/netconfigs     and restart it with 

sudo service citadel restart

But while restarting the service, the folder netconfigs gets disapears again. 

Could anybody help please - I'm to give up! Thank you very much!!! 

 

Bernhard 

 

 



[#] Sat Sep 16 2017 15:50:17 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Log - in Problem after 1st Installation - missing foder

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

After installing the suite, I found out, that the folder

/etc/citadel/*netconfigs*

Bernhard - if you are performing a new installation, please use the Easy Install method. It is more current code, more supportable than the debian packages, and best of all ... the netconfigs directory is no longer needed, as all that stuff is kept in the configuration database now.

[#] Sat Sep 16 2017 15:51:28 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on
several fronts. Citadel might fit the bill. Does Citadel support
multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail
domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will
resolve correctly?

Reverse DNS resolution is determined using DNS, not using Citadel. That having been said, Citadel *does* support multiple email domains, though not in the way you are describing it. Basically you can have as many email domains as you want, and each user account can have addresses in one or more of those domains.

[#] Sat Sep 16 2017 21:57:17 EDT from bennabiy @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

IG, couldn't they do a reverse proxy to multiple citadel instances and have the proxy pick it up based on domain?

Sat Sep 16 2017 03:51:28 PM EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...
I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on
several fronts. Citadel might fit the bill. Does Citadel support
multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail
domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will
resolve correctly?

Reverse DNS resolution is determined using DNS, not using Citadel. That having been said, Citadel *does* support multiple email domains, though not in the way you are describing it. Basically you can have as many email domains as you want, and each user account can have addresses in one or more of those domains.

 



[#] Mon Sep 18 2017 11:40:00 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

IG, couldn't they do a reverse proxy to multiple citadel instances and have

the proxy pick it up based on domain?

Yes, that would work too. Depends on the individual site's needs. Multiple instances might make more sense if the server is being run for a bunch of separate organizations.

Go to page: First ... 22 23 24 25 [26] 27 28 29 30 ... Last