Whether you like this fact or not the Johnson amendment is blatantly unconstitutional. For better or worse, it it what it is.
Tue Jul 08 2025 14:00:56 UTC from Nurb432Didn't read details, don't care.
But something about IRS now approving non-profit churches to promote political parties/candidates.
This is a bad move. Needs to be hard separation.. And for those that say 'yay' be careful what you wish for. It always bites you in the ass, and when the shoe is on the other foot, then you complain.
"There will be no amnesty and you will be deported" "well, unless you are working in an agricultural capacity, or a 'service worker' then you get a reprieve". Yep. Backtracking as expected. So about the only thing i feel hes done 'for' the country, is slowing down.
Oh and "there will be no arrests related to the Epstein documents and no more documents will be released". On top the 'there is no client list, and we know he committed suicide. "
Skipping my feelings about 'propping up the old boys club funds" Just as i have been saying: New name. Same DC. it never changes.Anyone that expected different was not paying attention to history.
We need to get rid of the income tax entirely. Or would you rather keep it because you like the fact that the government uses it to muzzle churches?
Tue Jul 08 2025 14:00:56 UTC from Nurb432Didn't read details, don't care.
But something about IRS now approving non-profit churches to promote political parties/candidates.
This is a bad move. Needs to be hard separation.. And for those that say 'yay' be careful what you wish for. It always bites you in the ass, and when the shoe is on the other foot, then you complain.
1 - Government never reduces taxes. If they do, then raise sales tax, they will bring income back. its a trap.
2 - "Organized Church" should not exist. Its a scam. As i have stated before in more detail.
3 - Aside from my feeling above which wont happen, as i have said before there should be a hard separation. Any overlap of the 2 is wrong. That includes a 'church' promoting political leaders, or 'church' getting tax breaks. Support their politics on their own personal time, NOT 'the church'.
Wed Jul 09 2025 15:01:21 UTC from SouthernComputerGeekWe need to get rid of the income tax entirely. Or would you rather keep it because you like the fact that the government uses it to muzzle churches?
Tue Jul 08 2025 14:00:56 UTC from Nurb432
Oh, and just to add, i feel ( almost ) the same about corporations. Other than actual political orgs:
1 - they do NOT promote any candidate/party. If their leaders want to support someone, great, but do it on their own time and separate from the company.
2 - while some do provide services for the government, which is unavoidable of course, it needs to be on a NON political/buddy basis, along with all efforts to make sure that scam is not in play ( public RFPs, 3rd party auditing, etc )
3 - no tax breaks here either. Pay their way, or gtfo,
Read the First Amendment.
Wed Jul 09 2025 15:25:08 UTC from Nurb4322 - "Organized Church" should not exist. Its a scam. As i have stated before in more detail.
3 - Aside from my feeling above which wont happen, as i have said before there should be a hard separation. Any overlap of the 2 is wrong. That includes a 'church' promoting political leaders, or 'church' getting tax breaks. Support their politics on their own personal time, NOT 'the church'.
I will claim whatever i want. you can either accept it or not. Not my problem Its yours.
And any other comment will be over in the trash, if i feel like it.
Wed Jul 09 2025 20:27:02 UTC from SouthernComputerGeekAnd don't ever claim you care about what the constitution says ever again.
"Trump threatens 50% tariffs on Brazil if it doesn’t stop the Bolsonaro ‘witch hunt’ trial".. Anyone remember Biden threatening Ukraine "stop this legal action or no money for you" and it was swept under the rug..
This sort of behavior should not be tolerated.
Last i heard from both facts and friends who live there, Brazil currently has a democratically run system, with a Constitution. Sure corruption, but you get that anywhere there is power..
Try again?
Thu Jul 10 2025 21:36:51 UTC from SouthernComputerGeekWe need a trade embargo on all communist nations.
I wasn't talking about Brazil you idiot.
Thu Jul 10 2025 21:55:44 UTC from Nurb432Last i heard from both facts and friends who live there, Brazil currently has a democratically run system, with a Constitution. Sure corruption, but you get that anywhere there is power..
Try again?
Thu Jul 10 2025 21:36:51 UTC from SouthernComputerGeekWe need a trade embargo on all communist nations.
The post directly above yours referenced Brazil, and the immoral actions of the current president ( and in comparison to immoral acts of the previous, tho he wasn't president at the time ). any normal person would have believed it was in response to that post, since you included ZERO other context.
Thu Jul 10 2025 22:04:36 UTC from SouthernComputerGeekI wasn't talking about Brazil you idiot.
Oh, really, says the faggot who is always whining about common sense regulations on trade.
Thu Jul 10 2025 22:09:12 UTC from Nurb432The post directly above yours referenced Brazil, and the immoral actions of the current president ( and in comparison to immoral acts of the previous, tho he wasn't president at the time ). any normal person would have believed it was in response to that post, since you included ZERO other context.
Thu Jul 10 2025 22:04:36 UTC from SouthernComputerGeekI wasn't talking about Brazil you idiot.
Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton were all communist tools. Opening up relations and trade with hostile, communist countries. Treasonous faggots.
Re:NYC
Wouldn't it be ironic if the Muslim candidate won only for NYC to get nuked by Iran? The irony of it all!
As scary as it sounds, i do suspect he will win. ( well, get into office anyway. Cant really say you truly win if the system is rigged to cheat in your favor, can you? )
Re:NYC
Wouldn't it be ironic if the Muslim candidate won only for NYC to get nuked by Iran? The irony of it all!