From a statisticans point of view, that would be a wise thing to do. Chances of two bombs at the same time on the same plane are far lower than those of only one bomb. Actually, you bring a life saver!
my thoughts exactly!
Tue Aug 02 2016 04:27:00 EDT from the_mgtFrom a statisticans point of view, that would be a wise thing to do. Chances of two bombs at the same time on the same plane are far lower than those of only one bomb. Actually, you bring a life saver!
Wow. That's just wrong, but brilliant! By bringing a bomb onto an airplane,
one reduces the chances of another bomb being present on the same airplane.
Safety in numbers!
Safety in numbers!
Death by statistical analysis. It's the latest trend. Kind of like those mail-away DNA tests that tell you your ancestry by statistical analysis. If you get the wrong results back you sometimes have to die in order to keep them accurate.
I was chatting with a client today and running metric reports for her so she
can get some statistics on turnaround times and times to completion. Most
of the times for her staff are amazing.. But there are some outliers..
I was like "What are you complainiing about? Have you heard of a bell curve? Welcome to statistics. Run the numbers, chart the facts, then identify and explain the outliers? Where's the problem?" She was all upset that 5 records out of 350 were 30% greater than the statistical mean. Oy.
I was like "What are you complainiing about? Have you heard of a bell curve? Welcome to statistics. Run the numbers, chart the facts, then identify and explain the outliers? Where's the problem?" She was all upset that 5 records out of 350 were 30% greater than the statistical mean. Oy.