Please wait...
2025-02-20 18:36 from Nurb432
Well, 'lite for v3' does not block YT ads fully. It shows a
blank screen thru some of them, others show a static banner..
and the video itself only played the last couple of minutes (
out of 11 ) . Not tried other stream sites yet, but that was
mostly a fail.
Off for another solution, before v2 dies on my desktop.
For Youtube videos, I have a private server that acts as an advertising removing proxy. It is a bitch to setup but if you are interested I can share details.
Fun fact, I think SearxNG has integration with some Youtube-ad-remover frontends.
I was doing something like that for a bit, but then i ran across a dedicated YT blocker, which then got removed by force "its malware, its gone, suckers".. then found ublock.
Ublock does still seem to work with FF. and YT-DLP.
For Youtube videos, I have a private server that acts as an advertising removing proxy. It is a bitch to setup but if you are interested I can share details.
Its still chromium based, so it will be impacted at some point. Tomorrow? Perhaps not, but someday it wont be practical to put back missing prices and not break things.
I have more faith than that in the ability of the free world to resist that kind of thing. We've done it before and we'll do it again if we have to. The death of Internet Explorer should serve as sufficient evidence to demonstrate that John Gilmore was right, the people of the Internet can and will work around anyone attempting to gatekeep.
And anyway the Chromium code now sits in a place where derivative works are pretty much the intention. Google, Microsoft, Brave, and a dozen others are pulling from it. Mozilla is dead to me, they are doubling down on being assholes about removing "nazis" from the community. Let them collapse, I don't care.
I would agree, but if anything i have learned is that each generation is more controllable than the previous and less likely to rock the boat. Even if they claim they will.
Today's generation, they just accept tech as it is, and are not organized or competent enough to change it. "this is how its always worked, feed us more 30 second videos .. *squirrel* what were we talking about?" ( and yes im speaking generalization not specific people, but it takes the 'whole' to force change in a different direction )
Sorry, i see the future is bleak, and i see the 'free world' as a lost concept that we are merely living in the shadows of, as the rulers see fit to keep people complaisant as they slowly, incrementally ratchet things down. I see no light at the end of the tunnel. Not even an oncoming train. ( but that should surprise no one :) )
Mon Feb 24 2025 14:27:55 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar
I have more faith than that in the ability of the free world to resist that kind of thing.
Subject: Your post's visibility has been limited.
And here's one more place where X is better than Twitter was, and definitely better than any Google property still is.
As I might have mentioned before, I actually have *three* accounts on X.
One as IG, one as the official X account for citadel.org, and a third account with a name I won't share that I use exclusively for shitposting. It wasn't hard to get kicked off Twitter, and in fact my primary email and phone number are still attached to an account whose lifetime ban is still in effect. Thankfully you don't need a phone number to activate an X account.
When the shitpost account crosses a line, so to speak ... and it happens often ... I get an email saying "Your post's visibility has been limited" and explains that it violated community guidelines. And that seems to be all that happens.
Google could learn a few things from this. Imagine not having to count strikes.
(EDS sufferers need not reply.)
Subject: Re: Your post's visibility has been limited.