Please wait...
And that's really the bottom line: 3D is a novelty, and it seems to have a
natural tendency to remain a novelty. It doesn't appear to have enough appeal
to be a fundamental advance in motion picture presentation, like sound and
color both were.
I know it cant be done with current tech, but it would be cool if you could be immersive in the film. and move around the scenes.
I guess when movies are 100% AI and not just green screen-CGI, it might be doable.
Tue Nov 14 2023 09:24:48 EST from IGnatius T FoobarAnd that's really the bottom line: 3D is a novelty, and it seems to have a natural tendency to remain a novelty. It doesn't appear to have enough appeal to be a fundamental advance in motion picture presentation, like sound and color both were.
2023-11-14 15:23 from Nurb432 <nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org>
I know it cant be done with current tech, but it would be cool if you
could be immersive in the film. and move around the scenes.
That's called a video game.
i think of games as more user-interactive than a 'movie'.
But yes, some game aspects would be play ( no pun.. hell, sure, a pun )
2023-11-14 09:24 from IGnatius T Foobar
And that's really the bottom line: 3D is a novelty, and it seems to
have a natural tendency to remain a novelty. It doesn't appear to have
enough appeal to be a fundamental advance in motion picture
presentation, like sound and color both were.
Exactly. It's not like it's new technology; it's been a solved problem for decades. It's just that nobody cares enough to pay for it, or even actively dislikes the effect. I saw a movie in 3D IMAX just once or twice, and I couldn't even tell you which films.