<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Gadgets</title><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/</link>
<description>Gadgets</description>
<item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099544954</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 04:55:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544954</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544954@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Nov 02 2025 22:22:32 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">I seem to recall having said "I wish PD were here, he knows this stuff" more than once. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I wish you could *heart* posts on Citadel still. :) I know you hate that idea, because it is FB/X social media BS. <br /><br />Anyhow... I'm here. I'm rusty. I'm f'kin around with an Apollo Computers V4 stand alone Amiga clone FPGA device right now - it is toasted. Block read errors and just acting like Jack Nicholson in one flew over the cockoo's nest after he gets fixed. I'll try to log in sober tomorrow and tell more about it - but for now - if you want Amiga emulation in FPGA - get a MiSTer - not a V4. The V4 is far more powerful - but super unstable. I ate $120 in CF cards this week trying to flash and upgrade it to the latest cores. Ouch. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099544180</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 15:14:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544180</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544180@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>While true in theory, and tho im not really too involved in the scene now now, im still filling drives with AI model training data before the plug is pulled on us digital-serfs and we go underground.   Every TB counts.</p>
<p>A couple id like to have, they are in the PB range, so out of reach for me.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And don't be too sad about my ROM/software purge, i really don't believe i had anything that isn't already 'out there'.  Be more sad of the hardware purge i did perhaps 10 years ago.  Over 100 retro machines. out the door.  Everything from a radio shack micro color, to a Kayroro and osborne, to a TRS80 md2 with printer and disk drives, apple 6100 and original mac laptop, a M100... a C16 and Plus4, a QL and 2 or 3 2068s.. bag of HP calculators and a couple of their pocket computers.  Couple 8 bit and 16 bit Ataris..   Oh and a Mattel aquarius, which few people have ever seen in the wild.   A sparcstation 10...  A few had their original boxes even.    Tons more ( im sure literally since some were so big . lol ).     All given away to people, none to the trash or sold off. Gifts      I did keep the shelves tho, repurposed them for tools. </p>
<p>Only things i kept was a PX-8 and a now dead newton ( i think dead think. i need to try again doing a hard reset sometime ) .  And a T1000 in its box. but gave that away a few weeks ago.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Couple years ago guy at work gave me a 1200xl. ( i forget exactly when now, but not too long ago ) I didn't want it, but he was so proud of it and happy to offer it to me, i didn't want to say no.  But its gone now too, it left with the T1000.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 08 2025 22:50:49 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"> It barely takes any room.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099544107</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 22:50:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544107</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544107@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-11-08 22:27 from Nurb432     
 >Sort of funny.     
 >    
 >Cleaning up my old storage drive last weekend, wiped out 1000s    
 >of roms for Atari, Commodore.. etc.    'why waste the space'     
    
 I am heartbroken.   
  
 I keep a lot of stuff. It barely takes any room. It is not like 5th generation
and onward sets, which take multiple Tb each. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099544104</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 22:27:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544104</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544104@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Sort of funny.</p>
<p>Cleaning up my old storage drive last weekend, wiped out 1000s of roms for Atari, Commodore.. etc.    'why waste the space'</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 08 2025 19:28:39 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Also I have a very complete Atari ROM collection which includes lots of stuff from the Atari 8bit computers. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099544096</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 19:28:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544096</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544096@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Also I have a very complete Atari ROM collection which includes lots of stuff
from the Atari 8bit computers. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099544095</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2025 19:27:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544095</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544095@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Fun fact, somebody uploaded an Atari Jaguar CD set a couple of days ago to
a warez site I am familiar with. It must have been one of you, guys. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099543956</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2025 11:51:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099543956</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099543956@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ya, they were some talented folks. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Nov 06 2025 17:57:20 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>Early Atari machines were very meh. If you were a kid you were much <br />better playing with sticks and stones than playing Atari consoles. </blockquote>
<br />Atari VCS (2600) games looked like crap ... and yet, years later, now that I know how those games were actually implemented (racing the beam, no frame buffer) I am quite impressed at what they were able to accomplish with such outrageously limited hardware. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099543879</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2025 17:57:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099543879</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099543879@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Early Atari machines were very meh. If you were a kid you were much   
 >better playing with sticks and stones than playing Atari consoles.     
  
 Atari VCS (2600) games looked like crap ... and yet, years later, now that
I know how those games were actually implemented (racing the beam, no frame
buffer) I am quite impressed at what they were able to accomplish with such
outrageously limited hardware. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099543762</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 16:10:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099543762</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099543762@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I do agree with the lack of games, ( tho Myst was an option ) but its their fault as due to the nearly non-existent marketing no one wanted to make anything for it.  But the hardware, was ahead of its time. I actually had one for perhaps 30 years..  i bought it.. use it about a week. "eh im bored'  and shelved it until a few years ago when i gave it to a collector at the office. Sure, trying to compare it to today, its garbage, but not in 'its day'. It just got a bad rap.  Sort of like one of my cars that i have, it was just fine but due to FUD marketing by competition it was perceived as trash, when it really wasn't.</p>
<p>Had a few games, CD drive, external memory card.. extra controllers. Original box...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Even today tho i can still see Skylar talking..   lol </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Nov 05 2025 14:26:07 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>BUT.. the Jaguar from what i remember was pretty impressive for <br />its day. Just poor, nearly non-existent marketing. </blockquote>
<br />The Jaguar is widely regarded as crap these days, and I mean by actual retro fans who think every old piece of technology is fun. I don't think I ever saw good games for it and I don't think many had good performance. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099543754</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 14:26:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099543754</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099543754@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >BUT.. the Jaguar from what i remember was pretty impressive for  
 >its day. Just poor, nearly non-existent marketing.   
  
 The Jaguar is widely regarded as crap these days, and I mean by actual retro
fans who think every old piece of technology is fun. I don't think I ever
saw good games for it and I don't think many had good performance. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099543725</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 11:34:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099543725</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099543725@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I was thinking the AtariST line, which i was a HUGE fan of, even tho this was Amiga territory.  Never was a gamer.  8Bit Atari ( again, computers not console ), i thought were competitive, at lest most of the time, they had a few screw ups ( everyone did back then ). </p>
<p>BUT.. the Jaguar from what i remember was pretty impressive for its day. Just poor, nearly non-existent marketing.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 04 2025 19:51:51 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>2025-11-02 22:50 from Nurb432 <br />I did mess with it a bit. Mostly 'emulation' of Z80 cp/m <br />however, not the Atari scene, and never was really into <br />gaming.  ( i am one of those who sort of think the line is <br />blurred here, its sort of emulation of hardware, but its sort of <br />not.. ) <br /><br />But honestly I got bored quickly as if i really wanted to do <br />that, it was easier on a 'real' machine, and went back to what <br />FPGAs are meant to be for us hobbyists: experimentation and <br />proof of concept, since its hard to justify the cost of taping <br />out a chip just for a hobby.. </blockquote>
<br />Early Atari machines were very meh. If you were a kid you were much better playing with sticks and stones than playing Atari consoles. <br /><br />Games started getting up to speed with the 3rd generation. And I say the ZX Spectrum looks like a cool platform. You can still find modern frameworks to code for the original Spectrum machines. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099543650</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 19:51:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099543650</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099543650@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-11-02 22:50 from Nurb432     
 >I did mess with it a bit. Mostly 'emulation' of Z80 cp/m    
 >however, not the Atari scene, and never was really into    
 >gaming.  ( i am one of those who sort of think the line is    
 >blurred here, its sort of emulation of hardware, but its sort of    
 >not.. )     
 >    
 >But honestly I got bored quickly as if i really wanted to do    
 >that, it was easier on a 'real' machine, and went back to what    
 >FPGAs are meant to be for us hobbyists: experimentation and    
 >proof of concept, since its hard to justify the cost of taping    
 >out a chip just for a hobby..     
    
 Early Atari machines were very meh. If you were a kid you were much better
playing with sticks and stones than playing Atari consoles.   
  
 Games started getting up to speed with the 3rd generation. And I say the
ZX Spectrum looks like a cool platform. You can still find modern frameworks
to code for the original Spectrum machines. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099543421</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:50:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099543421</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099543421@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I did mess with it a bit. Mostly 'emulation' of Z80 cp/m however, not the Atari scene, and never was really into gaming.  ( i am one of those who sort of think the line is blurred here, its sort of emulation of hardware, but its sort of not.. )</p>
<p>But honestly I got bored quickly as if i really wanted to do that, it was easier on a 'real' machine, and went back to what FPGAs are meant to be for us hobbyists: experimentation and proof of concept, since its hard to justify the cost of taping out a chip just for a hobby..</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Oct 30 2025 20:54:16 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Interesting to see you guys talking about MiSTer and MiSTerPi. I don't remember anyone here being very into Retro emulation when I stopped coming around here last. </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099543418</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:22:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099543418</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099543418@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I seem to recall having said "I wish PD were here, he knows this stuff" more
than once. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099543047</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2025 20:54:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099543047</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099543047@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Interesting to see you guys talking about MiSTer and MiSTerPi. I don't remember anyone here being very into Retro emulation when I stopped coming around here last. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099507170</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 21:44:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099507170</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099507170@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099507148</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 17:43:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099507148</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099507148@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>*insert image of RPI on fire in a dumpster here*     </p>
<p> </p>
<p>lol </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099507118</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 14:16:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Pi</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099507118@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Pi CM5 All the way !</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>What's your experience with the Pi 5 so far, myte?  Does their new I/O chip bring the Pi up to comparable speed with other ARM boards on the market?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099506864</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 12:11:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Pi</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099506864@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ewww.  So many better options out there than RPI products. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Feb 03 2025 11:51:22 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=myte">myte</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Pi</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Pi CM5 All the way ! </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099506862</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Feb 2025 11:51:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Pi</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099506862@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Pi CM5 All the way ! 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099505552</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2025 06:46:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099505552</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505552@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 20 2025 21:15:05 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Is the MISTer Pi an FPGA based solution like its predecessor, or does it really emulate all those gates in software?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>It uses the same FPGA as the DE10 Nano. It uses fewer layers of circuit boards though. It works with the same cores as the original MISTer.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099505332</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:35:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099505332</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505332@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I didnt real real close, but my guess it would be a FPGA hat, but of lesser power then the Mister, so i suspect its a bit of both now.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 20 2025 21:15:05 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>Sorry for the post necro but the MISTer Pi looks like an affordable <br />alternative to the DE10 Nano based MISTer. It lists for about $180 USD </blockquote>
<br />No need to apologize, every new member of our community adds something valuable. <br /><br />Is the MISTer Pi an FPGA based solution like its predecessor, or does it really emulate all those gates in software?</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099505329</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 21:15:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099505329</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505329@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Sorry for the post necro but the MISTer Pi looks like an affordable 
 >alternative to the DE10 Nano based MISTer. It lists for about $180 USD
 
 No need to apologize, every new member of our community adds something valuable.
 
 Is the MISTer Pi an FPGA based solution like its predecessor, or does it
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099505178</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 21:20:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099505178</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505178@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Most retro fans i know have moved on from FPGA to just regular emulation.  While technically FPGA is more 'accurate' since its basically hardware ( i know, its a bit fuzzy ), but emulation software is close enough for most people.</p>
<p>The real hardcore, do neither and find the real thing and bring it back to life.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099505177</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 20:44:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099505177</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505177@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Sep 04 2019 04:48:08 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">If you want to relive your old classic retro machines - I can't recommend MiST, MiSTer and other FPGA platforms enough as the saner alternative to trying to keep 34+ year old machines alive and running. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Sorry for the post necro but the MISTer Pi looks like an affordable alternative to the DE10 Nano based MISTer. It lists for about $180 USD complete and for the MiniMig core, not all circuit boards are needed. If I weren't trying to conserve funds, I'd preorder for the next available batch. I've still got a stock A1200 and an A500 that I never use due to FS-UAE on my Linux box replacing them.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Also, my G4 Mac Mini running registered MorphOS costed about the same as the MISTer Pi and I program it about as much as the other Amiga-likes. After seeing how powerful the Flutter framework is I'm tempted to make a spinoff for AmigaE but that's for another discussion.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099489831</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Sep 2024 21:28:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099489831</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099489831@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Anyone want to buy a pager? i have a few in a box, no batteries. Cheap, free shipping.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>lol </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099372258</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jan 2024 16:04:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099372258</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099372258@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2023-11-14 09:24 from IGnatius T Foobar   
 >And that's really the bottom line: 3D is a novelty, and it seems to   
 >have a natural tendency to remain a novelty.  It doesn't appear to have
 
 >enough appeal to be a fundamental advance in motion picture   
 >presentation, like sound and color both were.   
 >   
 >  
  
 Exactly. It's not like it's new technology; it's been a solved problem for
decades. It's just that nobody cares enough to pay for it, or even actively
dislikes the effect. I saw a movie in 3D IMAX just once or twice, and I couldn't
even tell you which films. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099369623</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 23:29:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369623</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369623@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > That's called a video game.   
  
 (+5; Insightful) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099369301</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2023 15:48:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369301</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369301@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>i think of games as more user-interactive than a 'movie'. </p>
<p>But yes, some game aspects would be play ( no pun.. hell, sure, a pun )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099369296</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2023 15:30:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369296</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369296@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2023-11-14 15:23 from Nurb432 <nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org>   
 >I know it cant be done with current tech, but it would be cool if you  
 >could be immersive in the film. and move around the scenes.    
 >  
  
 That's called a video game. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368959</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 15:23:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368959</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368959@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I know it cant be done with current tech, but it would be cool if you could be immersive in the film. and move around the scenes. </p>
<p>I guess when movies are 100% AI and not just green screen-CGI, it might be doable. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 14 2023 09:24:48 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">And that's really the bottom line: 3D is a novelty, and it seems to have a natural tendency to remain a novelty. It doesn't appear to have enough appeal to be a fundamental advance in motion picture presentation, like sound and color both were. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368954</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 14:24:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368954</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368954@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[And that's really the bottom line: 3D is a novelty, and it seems to have a
natural tendency to remain a novelty.  It doesn't appear to have enough appeal
to be a fundamental advance in motion picture presentation, like sound and
color both were. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368912</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 22:38:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368912</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368912@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > I am curious as to which 3D movies you have watched. The only ones I  

  
 You got me there. Only some IMAX documentary stuff with the polarized glasses.
It was neat seeing the sharks swim at me, but it just didn't wow me enough
to want to see it everywhere. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368902</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 22:19:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368902</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368902@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I know you didnt ask me, but  my theater experience was Tron Legacy.</p>
<p>Tried a couple others on my headset: Toy story 1, Solo ( the star wars thing...  no idea of the actual content just watched to see the 3D ), and one of the avengers movies, i think it was the first one, infinity war and several demo files i picked up. Oh and of course Legacy again, since i missed it totally on the big screen and wanted to see what i missed..  seemed to be nothing really as the 2D version was about the same really.  A friend of mine liked 3D porno. Honestly didnt care for at any of that, seemed silly to me.</p>
<p>And of course i had a 3D client for OpenSIm, which has since vanished, to my frustration. and a few google cardboard demo apps which uses the gyroscope and accelerometer to move you around in-world. Good way to lose your balance an fall out of an office chair  :)  One you could walk down the hall, and it tracked motion into the 'scene'. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Oh, and the AR thing that used a cube with what looked almost like QR codes on all 6 sides, so it could identify them and their position as it moved.... ( "merge cube" ) To me, that was neat. The cube would vanish and it woudl be replaced with an 'object' that you could move around and such. ( like a museum bust, for example, or a game piece ). Seen tables like that too, sort of like the chess board on starwars.. where the table was a design it could 'hide' with a fake object.  AR had a lot of promise with stuff like that.  May still with these new AR glasses that keep coming out ( not bulky headsets ), donno</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368887</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 18:30:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368887</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368887@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Anyway. I guess I just haven't seen a 3D film that wowed me all that  
  
 >much, and I just don't look forward to it all that much. Or at all,    

 >really.     
    
 I am curious as to which 3D movies you have watched. The only ones I remember
watching in 3D are Avatar and Gravity. Gravity falls square in the category
of films that based all their appeal on presentation and aesthetics.   
  
 I have watched some more but I can't name them. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368838</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 00:46:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368838</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368838@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > My opinion is that, in an artistic medium such as films and   
 >videogames, visual beauty is an optional thing that is good to have. It
 
 >is a bit like horses: I am gonna love any who wannas pull my beard if  

 >she is ugly, but if she is beautyful to look at, then it is a plus.    
 
 >  
  
 Sure, it is better if it's attractive. And of course there are plenty of
old games and movies that are super ugly. But what I was trying to say is
that you can, at least in my opinion, achieve beauty even with limited tech.
It takes some artistic skill and creativity. It's like you said about compensating
for lack of sustance. I think it also applies to the art itself. Sometimes
the eye candy tech and gimmicks are used to try to hide a lack of artistic
creativity. 
  
 Anyway. I guess I just haven't seen a 3D film that wowed me all that much,
and I just don't look forward to it all that much. Or at all, really. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368828</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2023 23:00:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368828</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368828@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > I think 3D as a fad goes beyond technical reasons, though. I actually 
     
 >think it just doesn't bring that much value. I can't quite put it into 
     
 >words right now, but it's like that Minecraft was able to outsell tons 
     
 >of photorealistic games for many years. What makes a video game fun    
  
 >isn't the eye candy, it's the gameplay and character (as in the       
 >artistry, not the characters in the story, though those of course      

 >contribute to what I'm talking about). People have been looking at flat
     
 >images for longer than recorded history. We all understand them and are
     
 >plenty capable of letting ourselves get immerses in them. You don't    
  
 >actually need to play tricks on my depth perception to achieve this.   
   
 >        
 > In fact, speaking of video games, I long got over chasing graphics and
     
 >I actually prefer presentation
and graphical aesthetics of the early to      
 >mid 90s. I guess you could argue that's just nostalgia, though. Like   
   
 >audiophiles who insist vinyl sounds better.       
 >       
      
 My opinion is that, in an artistic medium such as films and videogames, visual
beauty is an optional thing that is good to have. It is a bit like horses:
I am gonna love any who wannas pull my beard if she is ugly, but if she is
beautyful to look at, then it is a plus.     
    
 The issue is some media is trying to compensate its lack of actual substance
with visual beauty only, and that does not work. A hot blonde with big boobs
is fine to look at but if she can't cook nor work not have clever conversation,
she is useless in the long run.   
  
 Videogames are a special case because modern ones suffer a number of issues
that are drectly related to monetization schemes. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368824</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2023 22:31:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368824</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368824@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Seems like all that matters is the projector. You can have two video   
 >channels and project each through a polarized filter. Maybe doing it   
 >that way results in too much light loss causing the image to appear   
 >dim, I don't know.     
  
 Modern video projectors work by shining a light through an LCD.  LCD displays
are already polarized, so further polarization will naturally make the image
appear even dimmer.  That's why consumer grade 3D televisions use active shutter
glasses. 
  
 Ironically, the easiest way to do 3D would be the way they did it half a
century ago: with anaglyph glasses.  (Yes I had to look up the name.)  Those
are the ones with red and cyan lenses.  You lose the ability to display full
color, of course, but the solution is extremely low-tech and works on existing
equipment. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368793</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2023 14:39:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368793</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368793@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I think it *could* if done well. But the few movies i saw were mostly a gimmick. Even tho i cant watch it on big screen without my head exploding from pain,  i was able on my phone-based VR headset, so i did see a few of them.  Sure, 'interesting' but they didnt 'use' it.   Now, for 3D architecture design walk thru, or CAD work and such, ( anyone here remember VMRL ? ) it was great. But movies, it was 'well, ok', and i could see that it had promise, but no follow thru.</p>
<p>Oh, and might have mentioned it before, but i have a slight case lazy eye, but not one you can see, its the signal that is delayed, just enough. Which im sure helps contribute to my almost constant migraines. So my depth perception, while there, is not the same as most people. As a kid i hated paying ball. "hey, the ball, catch it"  look up, see a ball, one eye washes out from the light, then it hits my face )  When i was a little kid my parents got me a view-master. I had no idea at the time what it as for, i looked. saw 2 images of the road runner and the coyote, sort of 'up in the air'. "um, ok, thanks..." and put it away. Flash forward to when i was about 15 or so, and i learned what it was all about  in history class ( i think.. might have been art class. ) and figured out how to merge the images and see it in 3D.. was the coolest thing i have ever seen :)  Went down and bought a bunch at the toy store that same day.  So when VR headsets came out, i was thrilled to death. Just to see it a non-st
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Nov 12 2023 09:24:36 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">I actually think it just doesn't bring that much value.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368789</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2023 14:24:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368789</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368789@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Seems like all that matters is the projector. You can have two video channels
and project each through a polarized filter. Maybe doing it that way results
in too much light loss causing the image to appear dim, I don't know.   
  
 I think 3D as a fad goes beyond technical reasons, though. I actually think
it just doesn't bring that much value. I can't quite put it into words right
now, but it's like that Minecraft was able to outsell tons of photorealistic
games for many years. What makes a video game fun isn't the eye candy, it's
the gameplay and character (as in the artistry, not the characters in the
story, though those of course contribute to what I'm talking about). People
have been looking at flat images for longer than recorded history. We all
understand them and are plenty capable of letting ourselves get immerses in
them. You don't actually need to play tricks on my depth perception
to achieve this. 
  
 In fact, speaking of video games, I long got over chasing graphics and I
actually prefer presentation and graphical aesthetics of the early to mid
90s. I guess you could argue that's just nostalgia, though. Like audiophiles
who insist vinyl sounds better. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368773</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Nov 2023 00:10:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368773</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368773@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ah, figured by then it was digital too.  </p>
<p>But i rarely do theaters, so dont follow it much.. ( as mentioned.. )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 11 2023 18:15:15 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">IMAX is film, and film can be polarized. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368768</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 23:15:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368768</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368768@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[IMAX is film, and film can be polarized.  That's how all of the 3-D theme
park attractions were built too.  It's an effective way to go because the
glasses are completely passive -- one lens is horizontally polarized and the
other is vertically polarized.  So unlike the ones from half a century ago,
you can still project in color. 
  
 Actually I think it's been almost exactly half a century since we really
started commercializing things that take advantage of the polarization of
light waves.  That's how LCD displays work, and they've been around for about
that long. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368757</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 18:33:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368757</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368757@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I could be wrong but i thought that is how the one movie i saw worked. I do know they were passive polarized glasses, and it was only one screen.  It was an imax theater, so donno what was going on in the back end. perhaps 2 projectors? i donno, us serfs dont get to look behind the curtain, so to speak.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 11 2023 12:56:18 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br /><br />(It was easier with film, since you can polarize one side vertically and the other horizontally, but that isn't possible with video [yet?].) <br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368756</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 18:27:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368756</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368756@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Once upon a time there were standards.. but no one honors them anymore. ( back to your greed statement.  gotta have walled gardens )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 11 2023 12:56:18 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br /> someone like SMPTE or VESA could call out a set of standards for 3D video, <br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368754</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 17:56:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368754</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368754@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 3D has been a fad for decades.  I have a couple of observations as to why,
some of which could potentially be fixed and one which cannot. 
  
 The proprietary glasses thing is part disorganization and part greed.  It
seems simple that someone like SMPTE or VESA could call out a set of standards
for 3D video, with a standardized subcarrier that tells the goggles which
eyepiece to shutter at any given moment.  This would work for television screens,
it would work for headsets (even though those have two screens), it could
even work for the little things that attach to a phone.  Heck, even if you
could just get Nvidia and Samsung and Apple on board, the rest of the industry
would just follow along. 
  
 (It was easier with film, since you can polarize one side vertically and
the other horizontally, but that isn't possible with video [yet?].) 
  
 The bigger problem is, quite simply, the
way we perceive artificial 3D.  To give the illusion of three dimensional
projection into a two dimensional space, we use any of many different methods
to feed a different image into each of the viewer's eyes.  The problem begins
there.  When you look at such an image, the *perceived* focal depth is different
from the *actual* focal depth of the projection.  And that, dear viewers,
is why it gives you a headache.  Some people are more sensitive to it than
others.  Some will begin experiencing a headache after only a few moments.
 Some can tolerate it for the length of a theme park attraction.  Some can
tolerate it for the duration of a feature length film.  But no one can tolerate
it for an extended period of time. 
  
 To avoid this side effect, you would need to project a three dimensional
image into a three dimensional space.  And that is not something you can just
put up for sale in Best Buy and have people set up in their living rooms.
  
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368359</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 19:21:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368359</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368359@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ah, that was after this as some people in our group had their own.  As it was also my last movie,  i never got to see the slow roll back to make a buck. ( actually now that i think of it.. was the first in at least a decade and last movie of any kind in a theater for me. Never was a fan of the 'big screen', being glued to a chair for 2 hours, and sitting so close to random humans ) </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Nov 06 2023 13:24:13 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Then they started selling you the googles alongisde the ticket, without giving you an option to save a few bucks by using googles you already owned instead. <br /><br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368351</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 18:35:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368351</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368351@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Or the problem with a lot of 3D capable TVs being 3-4x moar expensive than their 2D counterparts.  Then the problem with "passive goggles" where different manufacturers put the polarization in different directions for Left and Right, so you couldn't use one passive goggles for a different brand of TV.  Oh, and then the "active goggles" which were even moar proprietary, in some cases they were model-specific!</p>
<p>Gee, I wonder why 3D never caught on.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Nov 06 2023 12:33:05 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />I thought the reason why 3d didn't take over movies is because theatres got greedy and wanted to charge you for googles even if you brought your own. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368350</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 18:24:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368350</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368350@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2023-11-06 12:54 from Nurb432           
 >The one 3D movie i went to see at the local imax, Tron legacy ( that   
      
 >i regret.. i basically missed the movie due to the instant migraine    
     
 >during the opening credits ) they used polarized glasses of some       
  
 >sort. You got to keep them afterwards.  Just recently ran across      
   
 >them and tossed them.            
          
 That is the point.         
        
 You used to buy the movie ticket and they asked you if you wanted to buy
the googles with them. If you didn't have googles, you bought them. If not,
you didn't.       
      
 Then they started selling you the googles alongisde the ticket, without giving
you an option to save a few bucks by using googles you already owned instead.
    
    
 That is the point a lot of pepople got angry as heck and quitted 3d movies
altogether.   
  
 Oh, there is a crosseyed
guy in my group of friends so we stopped going to 3d movies when we got together,
because this guy can't really take advntage of 3D projections. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368341</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 17:54:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368341</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368341@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The one 3D movie i went to see at the local imax, Tron legacy ( that i regret.. i basically missed the movie due to the instant migraine during the opening credits ) they used polarized glasses of some sort. You got to keep them afterwards.  Just recently ran across them and tossed them. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Nov 06 2023 12:33:05 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">I thought the reason why 3d didn't take over movies is because theatres got greedy and wanted to charge you for googles even if you brought your own. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368332</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 17:33:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368332</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368332@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > But it's for this reason that 3-D didn't take over "all movies" ...   
 >and it's also one of the reasons why VR goggles, even if there's a nice
 
 >little market for them, aren't going to become as ubiquitous as   
 >smartphones.   
 >   
 >  
  
 I thought the reason why 3d didn't take over movies is because theatres got
greedy and wanted to charge you for googles even if you brought your own.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099368028</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 13:33:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368028</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368028@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Was cleaning yesterday ran across my 3D headset ( that works with a phone for the display ) </p>
<p>Had so much promise.   but no. fizzled out. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315872</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2022 16:25:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315872</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315872@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[People get headaches from 3D because of the difference between *actual* and
*perceived* focal distances.  It seems reasonable that the effect is different
depending on whether the actual image is at screen distance or goggles distance.

  
 But it's for this reason that 3-D didn't take over "all movies" ... and it's
also one of the reasons why VR goggles, even if there's a nice little market
for them, aren't going to become as ubiquitous as smartphones. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315819</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 22:31:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315819</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315819@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I assume in moderation it would be fine.</p>
<p>I have lazy eye, and ironically i can actually see 3D in these things and not get headaches.  Went to a 3D imax once. I made it 1/2 thru the opening credits and i thought my head was going to explode. i kept avoiding it but when tron 2 came out, i just had to risk it.   </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315779</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2022 14:31:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315779</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315779@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[What are the health effects of those things? I'd be worried about destroying
my eyes even worse than they've already been destroyed. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315690</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 16:07:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315690</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315690@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>i have 2 phone headsets. they are cool. not perfect but cool.  One has a removable face plate so it can do AR too. Some of the 3D walk thru things are neat.  OpenSim was too, until the developer stopped work on the client and then pulled it from the store</p>
<p>aside from the obvious 3D movies you can watch, you can watch 2D movies and its like a 50" screen</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315676</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 13:52:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315676</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315676@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The porn industry seems content with the cheap goggles into which you drop
your phone.  (Fun fact: a simple device that focuses each of your eyes on
a separate picture is called a Stereopticon.) 
  
 I think there's a lot of potential there since everyone already owns a smartphone.
 The screen is big enough for the googles to see a pair of images, and it's
got all of the position and orientation sensors already in place. 
  
 For VR porn to become fully immersive it would require a system that could
provide touch and smell and taste sensations that would generally require
"jacking in" rather than simulating the experience with a headset. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315568</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 11:01:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315568</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315568@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I thought porn adopted VR first? </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 01 2022 06:40:16 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />Some friends of mine work at a startup. Their star product is a program that generates network maps and then displays them as a pretty graphic. They have a department working on a VR interface so they can show the generated maps to management as a pretty VR world. <br /><br />It is funny, but not a practical use of resources at this point IMO. <br /><br />As a friend of mine always says, you will know when a technology is ready for mass adoption when it becomes practical and actually useful for the porn industry. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315563</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:40:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315563</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315563@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2022-10-29 16:14 from Nurb432       
 >Which is too bad, there was a lot of potential there.        
 >      
 >        
 >      
 >It also works for people that work in CAD ( like designing houses,     

 >neighborhoods ) and people who like 'games' like opensim, and a few    
 
 >other industries too.       
 >      
 >        
 >      
 >And hey battlezone in true 3D would be cool..        
      
 Some friends of mine work at a startup. Their star product is a program that
generates network maps and then displays them as a pretty graphic. They have
a department working on a VR interface so they can show the generated maps
to management as a pretty VR world.     
    
 It is funny, but not a practical use of resources at this point IMO.   
  
 As a friend of mine always says, you will know when a technology is ready
for mass adoption when it becomes practical and actually useful for the porn
industry. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315562</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 10:35:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315562</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315562@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2022-10-29 11:49 from BLADE-RUNNER   
 >SO... who's getting a Meta headset ?   
 >   
 >  
  
 I don't, for the time being. Specially if it is related to Meta, which is
a corp that eats babies and sharpens their bones to stab another babies with
them. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315360</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 20:14:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315360</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315360@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Which is too bad, there was a lot of potential there. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>It also works for people that work in CAD ( like designing houses, neighborhoods ) and people who like 'games' like opensim, and a few other industries too.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And hey battlezone in true 3D would be cool.. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Oct 29 2022 02:15:05 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br /><br />3D movies appear to have come and gone. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315349</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 18:34:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315349</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315349@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I have squandered enough of my life staring at a screen. I've gotten to the
point that I don't want my video games to be realistic and immersive anymore.
If I want to experience a 3D world, I should be going outside. And I don't
do that enough as it is. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315346</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 18:15:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315346</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315346@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[There are some people saying that virtual reality is going to be as big a
change as the rise of smartphones and ubiquitous Internet connectivity. 
  
 It's obviously good for some kinds of games, so I'll probably get one when
Nintendo does something with it. 
  
 It's obviously good for pr0n, but I have a human partner and it's kind of
hard to beat that level of reality. 
  
 3D movies appear to have come and gone. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315325</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 15:57:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315325</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315325@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not me.</p>
<p>I do have a headset that you shove a phone into.  its fun to play with, and neat to watch 3D movies.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Oct 29 2022 11:49:59 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=BLADE-RUNNER">BLADE-RUNNER</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">SO... who's getting a Meta headset ? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=2099315319</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2022 15:49:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315319</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315319@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[SO... who's getting a Meta headset ? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4597880</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 19:40:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4597880</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4597880@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yeah. There has been a recent jump in interest in retro platforms across the board - and lots of "makers" are putting out really cool devices that connect new stuff with the old stuff. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Sep 29 2020 09:21:30 EDT</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">What's probably really cool is that the parts and tooling required to interface with old computers are dirt cheap now. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4586873</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:21:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4586873</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4586873@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[What's probably really cool is that the parts and tooling required to interface
with old computers are dirt cheap now.   
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4574612</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2020 19:26:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4574612</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4574612@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Sep 16 2019 10:01:16 EDT</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">The ones I've seen emulate a floppy drive using an SD Card, and have buttons to activate any of hundreds of floppy images stored on the card as the disk actually inserted in the drive. Then you can put the SD Card into a modern computer to load software onto it. <br /><br />I don't think it emulates a full USB stack. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Actually, a USB thumb drive. I've got one in my Amiga 500, and otherwise, it works exactly as Ig describes. Pop the thumb drive into my PC, download disk image files (amiga .adf files) then pop the thumb drive into the Amiga, enter the setup software, put the .adf images into "slots", then I can scroll through the .adf files in their slots and they mount on the Amiga and are seen as floppy disks in a floppy drive. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4485113</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:01:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4485113</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4485113@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The ones I've seen emulate a floppy drive using an SD Card, and have buttons
to activate any of hundreds of floppy images stored on the card as the disk
actually inserted in the drive.  Then you can put the SD Card into a modern
computer to load software onto it. 
  
 I don't think it emulates a full USB stack. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4485056</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 09:34:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4485056</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4485056@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Wait... that device converts your floppy interface to a USB interface?  That's
interesting. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4482005</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2019 01:45:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4482005</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4482005@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Google Gotek. It works on multiple different retro platforms - you just have
to flash it for the appropriate system. They mostly get used for Amiga and
Atari ST platforms - but they're intended for Roland synthesizers, I believe.
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4481848</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 14:10:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4481848</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4481848@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The floppy disk emulator sounds like a really cool idea, because my actual
floppies demagnetized long ago hahaha 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4481734</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2019 04:48:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4481734</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4481734@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh, I also got a real Amiga 500 recently. Paid $329 for it, which is way too
much, but the guy swore it worked, he was in Irving, and I was driving to
L.A. that weekend to go to Mumford and Sons with my wife (this is a compromise
that means I never have to go to Dave Matthews, which seems like a fair trade,
to me...) Anyhow. So, I go down, drive the 45 minutes down to Irving, meet
the guy and do the trade, he says, "My brother is the computer guy and he
is deployed right now, so if there is any problem, let me know and I'll make
it right." Get it home, plug it in, floppy reads me 30 year old copy of the
iconic Juggler demo... but the keyboard won't work. Only the top row of keys
respond. I bought an Amiga 500 because they didn't have real time clocks,
so they don't have VARTA batteries, which are infamous for leaking and eating
motherboards. When the keyboard didn't work, I turned it open
and opened the trapdoor expansion, and there was a RTC memory card with a
leaking VARTA battery that had vented up onto the connector for the keyboard
membrane.  
   
 I bought a new keyboard membrane from the UK for $35... got the guy to refund
me so my out of pocket cost was $179. Removed the leaky battery and washed
everything down with vinegar, distilled water, and IPA. Assembled it all,
and got it working. Then I bought a thing called a Gotek which is a floppy
disk emulator. Allows you to hook up a thumb drive with up to 999 floppy disk
images on it. Got myself a switch that allows you to chang the drive assignments
of the external and internal floppy, because the floppy images want to be
the first, internal drive (df0: in Amiga) not the external (df1:). Got an
RF modulator and hooked it up by component in to an LCD TV. All told, about
$330 into it... and here I am, on Uncensored, in
the MiSTer FPGA Minimig Amiga core, while the real Amiga sits out on the other
room looking really cool. If you want to relive your old classic retro machines
- I can't recommend MiST, MiSTer and other FPGA platforms enough as the saner
alternative to trying to keep 34+ year old machines alive and running.  
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4476422</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 22:52:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4476422</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4476422@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Youtube is beyond any possibility of atonement of salvation. 
 It is full of influencers, youtuber wannabes and helspawn maggots. And they
put advertisements everywhere so you will suffer if you are not careful. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4476385</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2019 18:59:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4476385</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4476385@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Because it wouldn't have Facebook and Twitter.  I'd give Google 30 days to
unfuck YouTube. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4475732</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 13:18:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4475732</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4475732@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Because it wouldn't exist?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4475718</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2019 12:34:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4475718</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4475718@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[If I had an EMP weapon ... well let's just say the Internet would become a
much better place. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4473393</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2019 10:03:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4473393</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4473393@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[You have not watched that Small Warriors movie. You don't use piercing bullets
to kill sentient machines off. You use EMP ! 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4445523</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 15:59:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4445523</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4445523@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[IG - They only count as gadgets if you use them to beat the toaster. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4445512</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 14:41:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4445512</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4445512@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Nope...those are tools for the Home Handyman room.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4445302</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2019 04:17:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4445302</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4445302@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought an axe and a crowbar a couple of days ago.  Do they count as gadgets?

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4435082</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:21:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4435082</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4435082@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I've heard that joke tons of times.  I still laugh at it each time.  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4434609</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Mar 2019 21:20:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4434609</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4434609@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >All of Ragnar's electronic gadgets eventually become sentient and try  

 >to kill him.  That's one of the reasons he keeps armor-piercing bullets
 
 >around.   
  
 My wife asked me why I keep a gun.  I said, "Transformers."  She laughed,
I laughed, the toaster laughed... I shot the toaster. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4416984</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Jan 2019 18:18:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4416984</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4416984@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[It's the new Apple iDefenestrator.  It creates a smooth pane of glass with
perfect bevels, and then throws itself through it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4412436</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:51:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4412436</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4412436@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Are you sure that it wasn't throwing itself out the window due to what it
was forced to hold and then listen to? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4412431</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 20:27:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4412431</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4412431@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[There's a reason I threw that iPod out the window..... 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4412421</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 19:06:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4412421</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4412421@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[All of Ragnar's electronic gadgets eventually become sentient and try to kill
him.  That's one of the reasons he keeps armor-piercing bullets around. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4412384</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 17:09:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4412384</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4412384@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I can certainly see your kindle doing the following:   
  
  
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qnd-hdmgfk 
  
 and no it's not a RickRoll. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4412377</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2019 16:28:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4412377</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4412377@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, I guess it senses my hostility. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4412114</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 22:11:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4412114</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4412114@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[That's weird. Mine has a separation between downloaded and entire library.
I wonder if it just doesn't like you. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4412071</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 20:11:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4412071</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4412071@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[It shows you every book in your collection, whether it's on your Kindle or
not.  You can hide things in groups, but that's a pain.  If you delete, it
deletes.   
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4412064</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 19:29:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4412064</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4412064@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I think if you delete a book, you can download it again without paying.  But
I do think it's deliberately slow because they want it to have an immensely
long battery life, particularly on the models which use e-paper and have no
backlight.  They basically consume zero battery except when you are flipping
pages. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Gadgets?start_reading_at=4412051</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 19:00:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4412051</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4412051@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Got a Kindle for Christmas.  I can't believe this thing is so popular.  It's
slow.  Managing books is abysmal.  Why the hell can't I hide books, instead
of deleting them (losing them forever)?  The only thing I can say good about
it is battery life.   
]]></description></item></channel></rss>

