Please wait...
One can hope it dies out. its a bad road to go down. But you know how the backroom deals go in DC, can never be sure about anything... And not to start a fight ( trying to be good here ), but from my view point its another 'its for the children' excuse, when in realty, its sinister and far reaching.
Aside from the potential data leakages that we all know is a huge risk these days, its another case of "im doing nothing wrong, and I don't want to be tracked doing it as its none of their damned business" sort of thing.
Thu Aug 07 2025 20:40:47 UTC from SouthernComputerGeek
"Additionally, the bill requires large (based on specified revenue, employment, or user criteria) websites, internet applications, and search engines (including social network sites) to meet certain requirements before using algorithms that prioritize information furnished to the user based on user-specific data. For example, such platforms must (1) provide users with notice that the website uses such algorithms, and (2) make available a version of the platform that uses algorithms that do not prioritize information based on user data."
At least part of that is somewhat comforting. I was afraid I would have to shut down this site because there's no way it would be able to function with age (and therefore identity) verification. I've seen the "large" stipulation in other attempts at this before, which suggests that they're only looking to go after the big sites, and not some nerd running a BBS off a server in his garage.
I still hate it, but if it happens in a form like the above, at least we can legally fly under the radar. I'd hate to have to go darknet only. Who knows, maybe it'll actually drive some people down into our layer of the net.
At least part of that is somewhat comforting. I was afraid I would
have to shut down this site because there's no way it would be able to
function with age (and therefore identity) verification. I've seen the
"large" stipulation in other attempts at this before, which suggests
that they're only looking to go after the big sites, and not some nerd
running a BBS off a server in his garage.
People pays too much attention to legal requirenments. My experience is that unless you are really big you can ignore them pretty much and nobody will give a damn. I regularly rape Paypal's TOS from my websites and nobody cares, for example.
Unless you are big of there is mass hysteria, nobody cares. Worst thing that has happened to me is the credit card processor phoned me and told me some item in by website didn't seem to be fully legalized. The solution? Pull the item from the site for 6 months then restore it again later XD
They make it vague enough they can target anyone they want, or let anyone they want slide past. its all part of the game.
One other helpful piece here is there is no 'prioritization based on user'.
Doubt it will drive any of the bigger players downstream, as they need paid and most of the unwashed masses have no clue in that arena. Besides, for all its benefits, living off crypto is pain and most of the networks are not 100% secure from the feds finding you. ( to be fair most were not meant to be anonymous. just private ) Especially if you want/need to exchange for Legal tender to use in your local economy, exchanges are watched very closely.
Mon Aug 11 2025 00:24:43 UTC from IGnatius T FoobarFrom the bill:
"Additionally, the bill requires large (based on specified revenue, employment, or user criteria) websites, internet applications, and search engines (including social network sites) to meet certain requirements before using algorithms that prioritize information furnished to the user based on user-specific data. For example, such platforms must (1) provide users with notice that the website uses such algorithms, and (2) make available a version of the platform that uses algorithms that do not prioritize information based on user data."
At least part of that is somewhat comforting. I was afraid I would have to shut down this site because there's no way it would be able to function with age (and therefore identity) verification. I've seen the "large" stipulation in other attempts at this before, which suggests that they're only looking to go after the big sites, and not some nerd running a BBS off a server in his garage.
I still hate it, but if it happens in a form like the above, at least we can legally fly under the radar. I'd hate to have to go darknet only. Who knows, maybe it'll actually drive some people down into our layer of the net.
WTF.
While i disagree with the UK doing this to their own citizens, what in the F were they mandating Apple give them access to US citizens data?
"Tulsi Gabbard, the United States’ director of national intelligence, said on Monday that London agreed to drop its requirement for Apple to provide a “back door” that would have allowed access to the protected data of US users and “encroached on our civil liberties”.
One Source -> https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2025/8/19/uk-drops-mandate-for-apple-back-door-us-spy-chief-says
And now. Attack on our right of political speech. To hell with what SCOTUS has ruled, in effect..
with all that is going on in such a short time period... Hitler would be proud. Ya, i said it.
Mon Aug 25 2025 20:36:13 UTC from Nurb432And now. Attack on our right of political speech. To hell with what SCOTUS has ruled, in effect..
I'll let JD Vance's post do the talking:
And i hear they are going to give all citizens jackboots to wear. Unless you speak out, then you got prison. Remember "unpatriotic" speech is publishable according to Dar leader. Thou shalt not question his authority At least for those who dont already own a set, like yourself.
Heil orange man!
Wed Aug 27 2025 01:10:02 UTC from SouthernComputerGeek
I'll let JD Vance's post do the talking:
His wife is just as bad apparently. Related to the latest news event, which will now be used to district from other things and push control.
~~~~~~~~~~~
"“Early warning signs are often evident, with many individuals exhibiting concerning behaviors and making violent threats online prior to their actions,” Mrs. Trump continued.
“To prevent future tragedies, it is crucial we look into behavioral threat assessments across all levels of society—beginning in our homes, extending through school districts, and, of course, social media platforms. Being aware of these warning signs and acting quickly can save lives and make American communities safer,” concluded the first lady, who has been a vocal advocate for children."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I read this book in school, before it was banned.
Its ok to make fun of people when they are offed, as long as they are on the other side of the fence.. but don't you dare talk smack about one of the king's buddies. If you express yourself and dont comply with the mandate, you will be doxxed, lose your job. perhaps your house burned. There also also legislature calls to ban people from ALL media, and jailed for 'inciting violence with your words'.
Hypocrites.
And as i have said before, Orwell is spinning in his grave about now.
You are so fucking annoying.
Sun Sep 14 2025 00:18:02 UTC from Nurb432Its ok to make fun of people when they are offed, as long as they are on the other side of the fence.. but don't you dare talk smack about one of the king's buddies. If you express yourself and dont comply with the mandate, you will be doxxed, lose your job. perhaps your house burned. There also also legislature calls to ban people from ALL media, and jailed for 'inciting violence with your words'.
Hypocrites.
And as i have said before, Orwell is spinning in his grave about now.