Please wait...
Why do they need to know? So they can do research for their inevitable hit pieces? It doesn't matter who Trump appoints, the HitlerMedia is just going to call them all racists anyway.
Trump should pay people to dress up and come out of the elevators. When the doors open up the person could walk out of the elevator, shout "YES! I got the appointment!" and look at the reporters. Or talk on their cell phone as they got out, "Hey honey, yeah, Trump gave me the gig, I got appointed, we are moving to Washington."
zooer +1000000 for the epic win.
And I think it's time to IGnore all further speculation about cabinet appointments. It's getting stupid. Everyone from Mitt Romney to a leftover ham sandwich is supposedly being considered.
I hear Jeff Sessions is going to be AG. Excellent choice.
I also hear that General Mattis is under consideration for SecDef.
If he gets in, expect ISIS to be obliterated.
Sessions is a good pick. He's always been a reliable warrior against climate hysteria. Together with placing a non-warmist in charge of the EPA, we can hopefully roll back some of the nonsense. I'm not interested in buying incandescent bulbs (except perhaps for my Easy Bake Oven) but I sure would like to see air-cooled diesel generators start getting approved for sale in the US again.
I don't know much about Mattis so I won't comment yet. I only say things that are well-reasoned and true. :)
"I come in peace. I didn't bring artillery. But I'm pleading with you, with tears in my eyes; If you fuck with me, I'll kill you all."
The same guy who *Republicans* refused to confirm for a federal judgeship, back in the day, because of his racist comments and biased litigation history should not be attorney general, i.e., the nation's top law enforcement official should not have a history of bias.
Fri Nov 18 2016 05:04:42 PM EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored
The same guy who *Republicans* refused to confirm for a federal judgeship, back in the day, because of his racist comments and biased litigation history should not be attorney general, i.e., the nation's top law enforcement official should not have a history of bias.
Why not? The current administration's AG have a history of bias.
I've always known that identity politics is the left's primary weapon, but I'm beginning to think that it's their *only* weapon.
The MSM is LITERALLY watching the bank of elevators at Trump Tower so they can immediately identify anyone possibly being considered for a position in the new administration, after which they write racist/sexist/antisemite hit pieces on those people, 100% of the time.
Perhaps one of the reasons President Trump was elected, was the fact that people have finally had enough of being called bigots every time they dared to question the left on anything. And perhaps one of the reasons the incoming administration is creating such an air of euphoria among us, is the anticipation that the days of having to deal with that nonsense may finally be over.
No, the left's lives by a set of rules.
People don't like this means they just don't have enough of it. The media will get worse. They have already attacked Trump for having dinner with his family and for only requesting a dollar a year salary as president. It will only get worse. This is what the left lives for.
How many Bush/Clinton/Obma/Hitler/Goldman Sachs people have to in your administration before you are one of them?
How many Bush/Clinton/Obma/Hitler/Goldman Sachs people have to in
your administration before you are one of them?
I don't know, but if Trump picks Mitt Romney for *any* position I'm going to be very disappointed.
Meanwhile, #PizzaGate is bursting onto the scene, and it's disgusting. What did the Secretary of State know, and when did she know it?