Actually I think he's Indian rather than Arabic, but there's no need to bring race into the picture -- Microsoft is an Equal Opportunity Evil Empire.
I've been saying "cold dead hands" for a while, but with the aid of a coupon
and some incompatibility frustrations, I've finally elected to upgrade my
Windows XP partition to 7.
Linux Mint the rest of the time, still.
Linux Mint the rest of the time, still.
For the benefit of the doubt let's assume it started as a partition but he
now runs it as a VM pointing directly to a disk partition instead of a virtual
disk file?
Creating a new user from the command line in the Linux shell:
useradd user1
Creating a new user from the command line in Windows PowerShell:
New-ADUser -SamAccountName User1 -AccountPassword (read-host "Set user password" -assecurestring) -name "User1" -enabled $true -PasswordNeverExpires $true -ChangePasswordAtLogon $false
Enough said.
Until you create some kind of batch file named 'useradd' that does all of that, substituting 'user1' with the first (and only) parameter.
But it's annoying, of course, that such a batch file does not already exist.
Still, if you want to do anything on a command line in Windows, you're in for some trouble anyway.
The fact that they built a shell and have started building "core" versions
of their server OS (no GUI) was encouraging, but Real Computer People have,
since then, been disappointed to find that the shell is unusable as an everyday
maintenance environment because it's so byzantine, and what they really want
you to do is install a set of remote administration tools on the desktop version
of their OS.
These are problems the unix world solved decades ago, and largely got it right.
These are problems the unix world solved decades ago, and largely got it right.
Tue Mar 04 2014 04:39:45 PM EST from fleeb @ Uncensored
Until you create some kind of batch file named 'useradd' that does all of that, substituting 'user1' with the first (and only) parameter.
But it's annoying, of course, that such a batch file does not already exist.
Still, if you want to do anything on a command line in Windows, you're in for some trouble anyway.
Don't use adduser, use useradd. useradd will just add them with the login as the parameter (the account will be added as disabled by default). Adduser is to "friendly" to be scripted well without some other hardware like expect.
I continue to maintain that every single installation of SharePoint in the world was a bad choice. The product is 100% superfluous.
Wiki: click what you want, read it.
SharePoint: maybe login works, maybe it doesn't. Navigate a bunch of superfluous menus. Find what you want, click on it. Instead of appearing as web page it has to be downloaded as an Office document.
This is progress? Why do people implement SharePoint? Because SharePoint.
That's about all I can see there.
For a while, work was planning to remove anything on the internal web which
was not SharePoint.
That got skoshed, fortunately.
That got skoshed, fortunately.
srsly ... SharePoint is a gigantic step backwards when it comes to online
document management. It's basically just a file server with version control
and a clumsy web interface.
Sources: Microsoft in talks to acquire mobile app development startup Xamarin
Microsoft gets a case of Mono? Source: CRN
http://www.codeproject.com/News.aspx?ntag=19837497495415238&_z=3255049 ->
So the mole finally becomes an official microsoft employee?