<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Econometrica</title><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/</link>
<description>Econometrica</description>
<item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099557314</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2026 06:52:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099557314</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099557314@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worcester_v._Georgia<br /><br />read it all. The Supreme Court has - by design - no ability to enforce their findings without the agreement of at least one other branch. It is why the founding fathers framed it this way. No one, not even the president - can REALLY at unilaterally. They've spent the last 250 years, all of them - trying to circumvent this brilliance. <br />The Supreme Court, the President, Congress - they all can get it wrong. Our system depends on at least ONE other branch going..." No - we get you. Let's move forward." <br /><br /><br />And this is an example where one branch felt one way - and no other branch would come forward to support them - so it was moot. <br /><br />It is a brilliant system. </p>
<p><br />We should understand it more, and fuck with it less. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Feb 22 2026 19:20:56 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=DarfWader">DarfWader</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Well, regardless of how we here feel about it, looks like the UK is going to sue to 'retain the original agreements made regardless of the ruling' and the admin just flipped SCOTUS the bird: " Top US trade negotiator Jamieson Greer insisted on Sunday that US policy on tariffs “hasn’t changed”, two days after the supreme court declared many of Donald Trump’s tariffs illegal."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Oh, and Illinois is suing for a refund....</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Going to be an interesting show to watch this summer..  </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099556912</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 19:20:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099556912</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099556912@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well, regardless of how we here feel about it, looks like the UK is going to sue to 'retain the original agreements made regardless of the ruling' and the admin just flipped SCOTUS the bird: " Top US trade negotiator Jamieson Greer insisted on Sunday that US policy on tariffs “hasn’t changed”, two days after the supreme court declared many of Donald Trump’s tariffs illegal."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Oh, and Illinois is suing for a refund....</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Going to be an interesting show to watch this summer..  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099556819</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 21:49:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099556819</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099556819@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>yes.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Feb 21 2026 16:07:12 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=SouthernComputerGeek">SouthernComputerGeek</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Do you think those laws are unconstitutional?</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099556803</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 16:07:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099556803</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099556803@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The ruling was really just about whether the IEEPA gives the president authority to impose tariffs. It did not challenge other laws like section 302 that clearly give hi the authority to impose tariffs. Do you think those laws are unconstitutional?</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Feb 21 2026 13:02:51 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=DarfWader">DarfWader</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>The ruling makes total sense to me. According to the constitution, congress controls the money. The president does not.   And that is basically what they affirmed. The president can ask, and if he's ( or she ) convincing, will get it, but congress still has the authority to actually do it. The same for war, and a few other items.. and these 'workarounds' that are taking place here lately in many arenas are wrong.</p>
<p>Even if i agree with an outcome, i refuse to be a hypocrite and i fully believe we should be following the rules. Besides, if 'my guy' breaks the rules and i ignore the law, i cant say a damned thing when the next one does it.. Precedent to support breaking the rules can be a very dangerous thing. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and yes i just broke my rule about not getting into politics, but i think this is more about following the law as written )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Feb 20 2026 22:39:41 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>It's a weird ruling for sure.  And it wouldn't even be a thing if the usual suspects hadn't turned it into a tribal politics issue.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099556778</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 13:02:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099556778</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099556778@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The ruling makes total sense to me. According to the constitution, congress controls the money. The president does not.   And that is basically what they affirmed. The president can ask, and if he's ( or she ) convincing, will get it, but congress still has the authority to actually do it. The same for war, and a few other items.. and these 'workarounds' that are taking place here lately in many arenas are wrong.</p>
<p>Even if i agree with an outcome, i refuse to be a hypocrite and i fully believe we should be following the rules. Besides, if 'my guy' breaks the rules and i ignore the law, i cant say a damned thing when the next one does it.. Precedent to support breaking the rules can be a very dangerous thing. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and yes i just broke my rule about not getting into politics, but i think this is more about following the law as written )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Feb 20 2026 22:39:41 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>It's a weird ruling for sure.  And it wouldn't even be a thing if the usual suspects hadn't turned it into a tribal politics issue.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099556704</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 22:39:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099556704</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099556704@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It's a weird ruling for sure.  And it wouldn't even be a thing if the usual suspects hadn't turned it into a tribal politics issue.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099556669</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2026 18:03:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099556669</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099556669@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So the Supreme Court has ruled that the IEEPA gives the president authority to impose trade embargoes and quotas, but not tariffs. Okay then, Trump should impose quotas. They will be far more effective anyway.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099549978</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 05:25:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099549978</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099549978@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Sean Combs, - P-Diddy - accused of great crimes, argues, "I own a dozen cokaburras. You don't own one Cokabura - Imma be fine." <br /><br /><br />This is now controversial - because Sean Combs is a predator - but I loved this line. <br /><br />Because imma be fine. At least as far as owning Cokaburras is concerned. <br /><br /><img src="https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/06/GettyImages-100972759.jpg?w=2000&amp;h=1126&amp;crop=1" alt="Russell Brand and Sean Combs attend the Los Angeles premiere of &quot;Get Him To The Greek&quot; at The Greek Theatre on May 25, 2010 in Los Angeles, California." /></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099548926</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 00:59:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099548926</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099548926@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > If you're married it's important to see eye-to-eye with your spouse on
       
 >financial strategy too, otherwise at best you get resentfulness and at 
       
 >worst the strategy doesn't work.         
 >          
        
 That is not a problem for me, and by the looks of it, never will.       
      
 My strategy is to funnel everything into agressive investments and never
withdraw (unless it is to pour it into a more agressive invesment). My target
is to have 4k liquid at most (because I might need to renew stocks for some
of my half-baked businesses), everything above that is invested in some overseas
company.     
    
 It is working great for me so far. Among my friends, I am the one who nominally
makes the less money from work/wages, but I am also the only one who could
purchase a house with no mortage from savings only. Around here that is massive.
  
  
 Kids these days just
don't know how to administrate their money. My cousing is scrapping by doing
temporary crappy jobs that don't pay, and instead of saving what he can he
goes and buys stuff he can't afford. Everybody these days has an 8k TV and
goes on vacation abroad. Then they complain they don't have a dime. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099548847</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2025 04:07:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099548847</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099548847@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Have you heard that old-school IT saying, about programs expanding   
 >until they take up every available resource, no matter how many unused 
 
 >resources you had at the begining? I think a whole lot of people is   
 >like that with their finances,  and that speaks very badly about them. 
 
  
 That's what every finance teacher points out first.  If income=outgo you're
going to be beyond broke quickly.  The advice to "pay yourself first" is fundamental.

  
 A lot of it is psychological in nature -- put the money where you don't see
it, and you won't be tempted to spend it.  I have portions of each paycheck
automatically distributed into a regular savings account, a long term investment
account, and several retirement vehicles (including a whole life policy which
is growing nicely).  If there's even a small taboo associated with drawing
down savings, the savings account will generally
grow. 
  
 Everything was working great until the hyperinflation we had a couple of
years ago.  That did some damage.  But the accounts are starting to recover.

  
 If you're married it's important to see eye-to-eye with your spouse on financial
strategy too, otherwise at best you get resentfulness and at worst the strategy
doesn't work. 
  
 Also, NEVER eat at Olive Garden.  It may not impact your finances but it
destroys your soul. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099548385</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 12:40:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099548385</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099548385@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"in many areas, private equity firms own 20% of more of the housing"</p>
<p> </p>
<p>You will own nothing, serf. Now, get back to work.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099547990</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2025 23:48:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099547990</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099547990@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Local grocery. Sale isle</p>
<p>6 pack of bottled coke ( the little bottles ) 9 bucks.  wtf.  Not that i want to get any but still wtf. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099547712</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 15:44:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099547712</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099547712@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Dunno the details or how wide spread.  But seems up in town they are 'piloting' a 'basic income' scheme. ( 6k a year or something )</p>
<p>While i wont say we need to ignore the needy that actually need help, this is not the answer and all it does is make matters worse. Cost of living goes up more than the handout is, and we all pay the price.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099546626</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2025 04:55:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099546626</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099546626@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh no, this, EXACTLY. And it is the... I've come up from the very bottom - and every time I climb a social level - I find now I am hanging out with people who have so much more than me that "making it," feels like "being at the bottom." <br /><br />I have a 2021 BMW M4 Competition, an M235i, a Denali Dually 3500, and a Razor Side by Side in my garage - and as far as my friends go - I've got the welfare garage. They've got Irocs and C8s and C7s and rare Vipers and McLarens and Blackwings are their daily drivers and I feel... insignificant when we all go to car shows. <br /><br />But the truth is - when you hear about wealthy people having 35,000 square foot homes - they've got a 2000 sq. foot WING of that estate. Their "bedroom" is bigger than most houses. But the rest of the house, there is ALWAYS something going on, always strangers wandering through their house, being entertained, doing events - they have landing pads for helicopters in their yard because - people are flying in, in helicopters - to do
<p>I mean, my *rational* mind goes, "Drive your BMW, enjoy your TAGS, and STFU, dumbass...." <br /><br />But the group I hang out with - I'm the poor kid. <br /><br />It is why Hollywood types lose site of what it is like to be "normal". You can't keep hanging out with the people back there when you're spending $1200 per plate at some exclusive dinner. They can't come. It isn't that you don't WANT them there. <br /><br />I know Chino, from the Deftones - sorta personally - like - I've partied with him and the whole band. They're a level beyond all of my current friends - they can't hang out with us - we couldn't all go out to a club... it would be chaos. They'll never invite me to their things - I can't hang out with - I dunno... probably Ke$ha and Jelly Roll and maybe Mick Jagger - I'd be inconvenient. I wouldn't say we're friends, or every were friends - but I have friends who are still "on talking terms" with them as friends - and THEY don't get invited either - because Deftones became rockstars, and m
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 25 2025 19:25:57 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;">Have you heard that old-school IT saying, about programs expanding until they take up every available resource, no matter how many unused resources you had at the begining? I think a whole lot of people is like that with their finances, and that speaks very badly about them.</span></blockquote>
<br />The issue with expanding your lifestyle until it uses all your available income is that you can't contract afterwards if you need to. Meanwhile if you are a cheap bastard who lives frugally and spends close to no money, the day you feel like breaking bank you can do something crazy (like having some vacation or whatever have you) and you are still in a good position. And since you are not spending you are never in crisis. <br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099546397</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 19:25:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099546397</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099546397@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >I suspect if i was suddenly handed a job with 3x income, or      
 >handed a winning lotto ticket, my base life style would still      
 >not change.  Still be driving a 40 year old car, and a 20 year      
 >old jeep.. Still have a smallish house ( tho i WOULD get the      
 >f-out of this area and back into the woods ).  No fancy      
 >clothes, eat the same foods. Still do things myself instead of      
 >paying for help.   Be the same "me", just with even less worry      
 >about the future.       
      
 Have you heard that old-school IT saying, about programs expanding until
they take up every available resource, no matter how many unused resources
you had at the begining? I think a whole lot of people is like that with their
finances,  and that speaks very badly about them.     
    
 The issue with expanding your lifestyle until it uses all your available
income is that you
can't contract afterwards if you need to. Meanwhile if you are a cheap bastard
who lives frugally and spends close to no money, the day you feel like breaking
bank you can do something crazy (like having some vacation or whatever have
you) and you are still in a good position. And since you are not spending
you are never in crisis.   
  
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099546156</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2025 03:06:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099546156</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099546156@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I've got a friend with 3 real Rolexes - whenever we go out, he always has to point out if I am wearing my Folex. Because... that is why you have the real thing right - to say, "That thing looks and works as good as mine, but it is fake, so mine is worth the $20,000 more I paid for mine." </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Funny you mention that now.   My daughter was going through some stuff tonight, and pulled out a small cat-shaped brooch pin encrusted in something sparkly.   My wife said to her, "that belonged to Aunt Grace, so those might be real diamonds."   And that was the thing about my great-aunt: she had so much good high-end stuff, that she could pull off a decent fake and no one would question it.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099545925</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 04:01:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099545925</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099545925@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Key to happiness. Live within your means - and live where you find you are content. But most of us, the more we make.... <br /><br />When I was an up and coming IT engineer in Northern California making $120,000 a year in 2001 and putting my wife through her UCD Master's Degree in 1998... I wanted a TAG watch - so bad. Our RECEPTIONIST in our Bay Area software company had one, he drove a brand new Thunderbird - and lived in a studio apartment in S.F. with 4 other people who had their scheduled time shifted so they could all sleep in a 1 room rental. But I was so jealous of his TAG. Right? <br /><br />So a few years ago, my wife got me a Redbull F1 limited edition TAG watch. It wasn't cheap. But... she had also bought me a Gulf livery F1 Tag copy from the Philippines on a trip for $50 a few years earlier. <br /><br />I think I like the fake one better. You can't TELL. I mean, I can't, you can't... a jeweler struggles - they're REALLY good now, the clones. <br /><br />But the difference is like $3450. 
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 15 2025 15:56:09 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<p>I suspect if i was suddenly handed a job with 3x income, or handed a winning lotto ticket, my base life style would still not change.  Still be driving a 40 year old car, and a 20 year old jeep.. Still have a smallish house ( tho i WOULD get the f-out of this area and back into the woods ).  No fancy clothes, eat the same foods. Still do things myself instead of paying for help.   Be the same "me", just with even less worry about the future.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099545020</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 15:56:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099545020</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099545020@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not that i'm in the same range so its not a 1:1, but mine never have. </p>
<p>Always have lived about the same regardless of what i was making. ( other than those couple of years in the 90s after i screwed up badly and learned to never jump unless you have a landing pad, basically ). More breathing room and less concern about 'what if', but never really changed my lifestyle.</p>
<p>I suspect if i was suddenly handed a job with 3x income, or handed a winning lotto ticket, my base life style would still not change.  Still be driving a 40 year old car, and a 20 year old jeep.. Still have a smallish house ( tho i WOULD get the f-out of this area and back into the woods ).  No fancy clothes, eat the same foods. Still do things myself instead of paying for help.   Be the same "me", just with even less worry about the future.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 15 2025 06:08:25 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy; font-size: 12px; display: inline !important;"> Your expenses rise to greet your income. </span></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099544972</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 06:08:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544972</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544972@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Nov 12 2025 16:08:32 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Also it's probably not even true. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>My household makes more than double that. Shhh. Let me assure you - it is NEVER enough. Your expenses rise to greet your income. And I get it - you may be figuring out how to buy Pizza Rolls for your kid for lunch while I'm figuring out how to buy 4 new Michelin Super Sport tires for my BMW M4... and that seems different...  Maybe it is. <br /><br />But from my perspective - it is still stressing about how I'm going to make ends meet and living "paycheck to paycheck," while carrying too much interest on my cards. Now I've got friends who have 5 Corvettes, a Viper, a McLaren - and they're like, "why are you driving around in that peasant BMW?" <br /><br />If I could give any advice - it is stop competing with whoever you're trying to keep up with. Our society causes so many problems "trying to keep up with the Jonses." Enough is never enough. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099544553</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 16:08:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544553</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544553@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Also it's probably not even true.   
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099544537</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2025 12:12:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544537</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544537@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>News blurb</p>
<p>"1/3 of American households make 150k or more a year"  Which means absolutely nothing. But, its food for the ignorant 'tax the rich' crowd.  Not sure how to do it, but we really need a 'purchasing power' metric, not just numbers that inflation and cost of living increase negate.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099544393</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 15:49:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544393</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544393@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Its not a 100% 1:1 comparison.</p>
<p>For a tree, the branches are not truly 'controlled' by the trunk and operate mostly autonomously. They do get 'support' from the trunk, and supplies from the ground since the trunk has the roots to collect it, but they also generate their own food via their leaves, and they grow however they want, based on sunlight, winds and physical barriers ..  But no ' control of function'.   And in some cases, they can even grow their own trunk and roots...  </p>
<p>I think comparing fingers on a hand to be closer..  There are similarities in that the brain does not control their growth, but any action, it does.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 11 2025 13:59:37 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">A tree has branches, and they are all controlled by the tree. Are they really branches? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099544376</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2025 13:59:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544376</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544376@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[A tree has branches, and they are all controlled by the tree.  Are they really
branches? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099544316</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 21:24:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544316</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544316@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>But if they are all controlled by a single entity ( not disagreeing )..   Are they really branches? </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Nov 10 2025 18:25:02 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote> But then again, back then we had 3 branches of government. Now <br />we have something like 1.25 </blockquote>
<br />Some would argue that we have three but they're all controlled by ${THOSE_PEOPLE} <br /><br />Fill in any value you want for the variable. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099544274</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 18:25:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544274</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544274@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > But then again, back then we had 3 branches of government. Now  
 >we have something like 1.25  
  
 Some would argue that we have three but they're all controlled by ${THOSE_PEOPLE}

  
 Fill in any value you want for the variable. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099543633</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 17:36:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099543633</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099543633@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Man. Prices are skyrocketing.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099541277</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 21:00:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099541277</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099541277@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Age? This round or my previous? </p>
<p>Well, perhaps i wasn't as involved back as child, but ti sure felt like we had 3 as they were always bickering at each other. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Oct 19 2025 17:55:47 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>2025-09-27 14:14 from Nurb432 &lt;nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org&gt; <br />When i grew up, congress handled the money, not the president.  <br /> But then again, back then we had 3 branches of government. Now we <br />have something like 1.25 <br /><br /></blockquote>
<br />How old are you? I don't believe we've had 3 branches of government in well over 100 years. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099541266</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 17:55:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099541266</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099541266@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-09-27 14:14 from Nurb432 <nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org>   
 >When i grew up, congress handled the money, not the president.   
 > But then again, back then we had 3 branches of government. Now we  
 >have something like 1.25  
 >  
  
 How old are you? I don't believe we've had 3 branches of government in well
over 100 years. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099540158</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 14:34:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099540158</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099540158@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Just in time for the holidays.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099537577</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 14:14:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099537577</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099537577@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>When i grew up, congress handled the money, not the president.   But then again, back then we had 3 branches of government. Now we have something like 1.25</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099536718</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2025 19:47:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099536718</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099536718@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not related to any room really, but since its 'on line sales' i stuck it here.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have rarely bought from them, a couple of ARM boards couple of years ago, but im now on the mailing list for Aliexpress.  Get an email 3 or 4 times a day on average: "hot items". I dont often look at the mail, not interested in buying  random stuff at the moment ( or if i was, the tariffs prices would put me off anyway ) but often times their ads are funny to read. Translation issues, or just weirdness in how its presented.   They don't mean to be, but are funny.   Here lately its been tons of lock-pick items.  its weird..</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099536365</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 10:27:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099536365</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099536365@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I cant even listen to him. All he does is rant and try to sell stuff, including his book(s), so little actual content its almost comical.  Sure, gotta make a living but sheesh...  And take a Dramamine or something.</p>
<p>He wasn't bad long ago, but not now.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Sep 19 2025 03:26:42 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>On the receiving end of lawfare </blockquote>
<br />Ok, that makes sense. Thanks for clarifying. <br /><br />Or as Mark Levin put it (back in 2016, when Levin didn't even *like* the idea of a Trump candidacy) -- "I've never seen anyone take more incoming." </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099536342</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2025 03:26:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099536342</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099536342@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > On the receiving end of lawfare   
  
 Ok, that makes sense.  Thanks for clarifying. 
  
 Or as Mark Levin put it (back in 2016, when Levin didn't even *like* the
idea of a Trump candidacy) -- "I've never seen anyone take more incoming."

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099535391</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:10:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099535391</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099535391@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>He also gives it out. Which is my point.</p>
<p>Get what you give. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Aug 30 2025 23:07:52 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>will see what happens next. ( my guess is he will try to jail the <br />court members, lawfare is how he works ) <br /><br /></blockquote>
<br />WTF you smoking? I don't think there's a politician in existence who has been more on the receiving end than Trump. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099534547</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 01:46:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099534547</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099534547@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-09-03 01:45 from IGnatius T Foobar <ajc@citadel.org>   
 >Explain that conclusion please.  Most presidents increase their net  
 >worth by tens or hundreds of millions of dollars while and after in  
 >office.  Mr. Trump's net worth has decreased.  
 >  
  
 On the receiving end of lawfare 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099534046</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2025 01:45:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099534046</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099534046@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Explain that conclusion please.  Most presidents increase their net worth by tens or hundreds of millions of dollars while and after in office.  Mr. Trump's net worth has decreased.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099533743</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2025 23:07:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099533743</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099533743@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >will see what happens next. ( my guess is he will try to jail the  
 >court members, lawfare is how he works )   
 >  
  
 WTF you smoking? I don't think there's a politician in existence who has
been more on the receiving end than Trump. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099533668</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 23:41:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099533668</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099533668@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Looks like most of the tariffs got struck down as being illegal.  We will see what happens next. ( my guess is he will try to jail the court members, lawfare is how he works )</p>
<p>And regardless if i agree with them or not, its not the president's job. Its congress.  Must follow the Constitution, or there isn't one.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099533592</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 16:59:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099533592</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099533592@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Aug 29 2025 16:54:59 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=SouthernComputerGeek">SouthernComputerGeek</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>If you build in America there is no tariff.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099533589</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 16:54:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099533589</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099533589@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>If you build in America there is no tariff.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099533562</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 14:39:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099533562</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099533562@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Its not.</p>
<p>Of course their excuse is "its only a %"</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Aug 29 2025 03:04:53 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">While I'm not going to get blackpilled, I am having some trouble understanding how this is any different from "seizing the means of production". </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099533517</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 03:04:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099533517</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099533517@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[While I'm not going to get blackpilled, I am having some trouble understanding
how this is any different from "seizing the means of production". 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099532839</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 20:54:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099532839</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099532839@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"The U.S. government could take equity stakes in more companies going forward, potentially through an American sovereign wealth fund, according to one of President Donald Trump's top economic advisers."</p>
<p>Yep, we are f-ed. Its over. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/us-stakes-companies-trump-sovereign-wealth-fund-rcna226946</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099532575</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2025 20:45:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099532575</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099532575@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I forget where i originally posted, but seems the deal went thru. The federal government now owns 10% of Intel, including voting rights.</p>
<p>And i guess they got it for free.. pressured into it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This is a really bad path we are going down.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099530790</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 18:26:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099530790</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099530790@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>New bank card arrives.  "Get started today call bla bla bla ! yay!"</p>
<p>So i call "you cant activate this until end of month"</p>
<p> </p>
<p>lol.  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099528981</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2025 21:18:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099528981</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099528981@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<p>So the crap bill passed.  "the top 5% of the elite will see the biggest returns and highest tax breaks"</p>
<p>Of course they will. Same old story, F- the serfs.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I call bullshit.  The political left paints EVERYTHING as "tax cuts for the rich."  You could raise the top tax bracket to 600% and throw buckets of money at "poor" people and they'd still call it "tax cuts for the rich."</p>
<p>In terms of raw dollars, higher earners will always save more on an across-the-board tax cut.  The same percentage of a bigger number is a bigger number.</p>
<p>Although I agree that consumption taxes would be better than income taxes, let's say instead we did a flat tax -- say, 5 or 10 percent for everyone, no brackets, no deductions.  Fair, right?  Nope, the left would still call it "tax cuts for the rich."</p>
<p>It's one of those things they just bleat out over and over again, like "climate change" and "racism" and "tax cuts for the rich".  All of them translate to "durrrrrrr I am stupid."</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099527217</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 20:00:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099527217</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099527217@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>which is what most of it is.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Jul 12 2025 19:25:14 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=SouthernComputerGeek">SouthernComputerGeek</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> shit </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099527212</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 19:25:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099527212</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099527212@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The whole point is to force companies to make their shit in America. Oh and I'm glad Trump's spine seems to be growing back.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099527207</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 17:42:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099527207</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099527207@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh and to be fair, Biden F-ed us too.   Both sides of the isle.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099527206</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 17:38:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099527206</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099527206@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ya, thanks Trump, and the old boys club.  They wont even notice this, and most will actually profit, but for those of us already dealing with higher prices the last few years due to various causes, its yet another 'pay cut'.  I bet some of them ( most? ) even enjoy watching us serfs suffer, while they are insulated from it all</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Budget Lab (TBL) estimated the effects all US tariffs and foreign retaliation implemented in 2025 through July 9, including the effects of the US-Vietnam trade framework, the 50% commodity tariffs on copper, and the July 7 &amp; July 9 announcements on new rates for 22 countries. TBL analyzed the July 9 tariff rates as if they stayed in effect in perpetuity.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Current Tariff Rate: Consumers face an overall average effective tariff rate of 18.0%, the highest since 1934. After consumption shifts, the average tariff rate will be 16.9%, the highest since 1936.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Overall Price Level &amp; Distributional Effects: The price level from all 2025 tariffs rises by 1.8% in the short-run, the equivalent of an average per household income loss of $2,400 in 2025. This assumes the Federal Reserve does not react to tariffs and so the real income adjustment comes primarily through prices rather than nominal incomes; if the Federal Reserve reacted, the adjustment could in part come in the form of lower nominal incomes. Annual pre-substitution losses for households at the bottom of the income distribution are $1,300. The post-substitution price increase settles at 1.5%, a $2,000 loss per household.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Commodity Prices: The 2025 tariffs disproportionately affect clothing and textiles, with consumers facing 39% higher shoe prices and 37% higher apparel prices in the short-run. Shoes and apparel prices both stay 18% higher in the long-run.</p>
<p>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099527137</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 23:56:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099527137</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099527137@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Capitalism. Noun.  /ˈkapədlˌizəm/</p>
<p>An economic system where private individuals or businesses own and control the means of production (like factories, land, and resources) and make decisions about what to produce and how to distribute goods and services. In a capitalist system, prices are primarily determined by supply and demand in free markets, and profit is a key motive for economic activity. </p>
<p>An economic system in which a country's businesses and industry are controlled and run for profit by private owners rather than by the government.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Common thread: Private Profit.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099527045</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2025 13:37:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099527045</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099527045@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jul 07 2025 12:22:49 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>"NASA is working on capturing the asteroid 16 in 2029.   its metal content of gold, silver, iron, platinum and cobalt is worth over $10,000,000,000,000,000,000 dollars and will make everyone on earth a billionaire."</p>
<p>All it really means is that means is the economy collapses as the value of things drop astronomically ( no pun intended ). </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>You do remember that Aluminum used to be a precious metal too, don't you? :-D</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099526413</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2025 12:22:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099526413</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099526413@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"NASA is working on capturing the asteroid 16 in 2029.   its metal content of gold, silver, iron, platinum and cobalt is worth over $10,000,000,000,000,000,000 dollars and will make everyone on earth a billionaire."</p>
<p>All it really means is that means is the economy collapses as the value of things drop astronomically ( no pun intended ). </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099526359</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2025 15:27:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099526359</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099526359@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Once you realize how much $ is out there for "tax services", "tax attorneys", as well as the penalization of select people by the IRS when needed, you know that will never happen.</p>
<p>Income taxes are a profitable tool for not only the government but the "insiders". Its why they were invented.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Jul 05 2025 21:28:08 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=SouthernComputerGeek">SouthernComputerGeek</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Would be much less of a mental burden on the average Joe than having to calculate how much income he owes to the IRS every year.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
<div class="message_content"><br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099526299</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 21:28:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099526299</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099526299@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>We should replace the Income Tax with tariffs or a sales tax or something similar. Would be much less of a mental burden on the average Joe than having to calculate how much income he owes to the IRS every year.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Jul 05 2025 18:50:25 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>So the crap bill passed.  "the top 5% of the elite will see the biggest returns and highest tax breaks"</p>
<p>Of course they will. Same old story, F- the serfs.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099526294</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 18:50:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099526294</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099526294@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So the crap bill passed.  "the top 5% of the elite will see the biggest returns and highest tax breaks"</p>
<p>Of course they will. Same old story, F- the serfs.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099525544</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2025 18:36:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099525544</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099525544@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<blockquote>
<p><strong>TRUMP SUSPENDS TRADE TALKS WITH CANADA</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099525435</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2025 22:42:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099525435</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099525435@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. economy shrank at a 0.5% annual pace from January through March as President Donald Trump’s trade wars disrupted business, the Commerce Department reported Thursday in an unexpected deterioration of earlier estimates.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Only going to get worse. The 'stick' is the wrong way to enact real change. Of course the elite, this does not effect them ( some even profit off it ). Just the rest of us are hurt. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099524492</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2025 00:11:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffa</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099524492@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-06-12 20:29 from ZoeGraystone <zoegraystone@uncensored.citadel.org>
  
 >Subject: Re: Tariffa  
 >It sounds good, but they would just make it up elsewhere.    
  
 "elsewhere" being inflation. We already have a wealth tax, so get rid of
the "temporary," "only to fund the war" income tax. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099523936</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2025 20:29:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffa</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099523936@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It sounds good, but they would just make it up elsewhere. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jun 10 2025 01:59:53 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: Tariffa</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Yeah. If anything should be abolished it ought to be income tax.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099523633</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2025 01:59:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffa</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099523633@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099523542</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2025 05:26:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffa</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099523542@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jun 03 2025 19:42:34 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Tariffa</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>2025-05-29 00:33 from SouthernComputerGeek <br />A federal court has decided to undo Trump's tariffs. Stupid <br />faggots. Trump campaigned on tariffs and we the people voted for <br />them. Screw these pompous courts!<br /><br /></blockquote>
<br />On which grounds did they revert the tariffs? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>They blocked the implementation of them rather than reverting them. Tariffs were the only way (other than apportionment) that the national government could support itself before the 16th amendment was passed and fiat currency finished the job. It was clearly within the constitutional authority of the executive branch to authorize trade deals and tariffs so the injunctive authority of the federal judge was quickly reversed.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099522995</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 19:42:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Tariffa</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099522995@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-05-29 00:33 from SouthernComputerGeek   
 >A federal court has decided to undo Trump's tariffs. Stupid  
 >faggots. Trump campaigned on tariffs and we the people voted for  
 >them. Screw these pompous courts!   
 >  
 >   
 >  
  
 On which grounds did they revert the tariffs? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099522994</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2025 19:41:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Pennies out</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099522994@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-05-23 13:50 from Nurb432   
 >Pennies are now gone ( well, from production, not existence ).   
  
 That is a bummer. I wanted to visit Traveller's tomb and place a penny upside
down on it. That way you could say Lincoln won the war, but would be forced
to watch the ass of General Lee's horse up close forever. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099522454</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2025 01:34:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099522454</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099522454@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/05/29/trumps-tariffs-are-back-in-effect-after-appeals-court-ruling/</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>An appeals court on Thursday stayed the ruling of the U.S. Court of International Trade that blocked President Donald Trump’s Liberation Day tariffs, meaning the tariffs are back in effect.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Good.<strong><br /></strong></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099522298</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:51:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099522298</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099522298@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I wasn't upset when Biden imposed tariffs on China. It was a rare Biden W. You clearly don't know me at all.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu May 29 2025 00:37:10 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ZoeGraystone">ZoeGraystone</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>So now the shoe is on the other foot and your guy cant act like a king, so you are upset.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099522297</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:37:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099522297</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099522297@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So now the shoe is on the other foot and your guy cant act like a king, so you are upset.</p>
<p>No president is a king, i don't care what side of the isle they are on and if i agree with them 100% or disagree with them 100%. I am not a hypocrite if they cross the line, they should be beat down by both the courts and legislature.  Its why we have 3 branches, to keep each other in check.   ( at least in theory, i do realize that it does not always work that way in reality )</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu May 29 2025 00:33:34 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=SouthernComputerGeek">SouthernComputerGeek</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>A federal court has decided to undo Trump's tariffs. Stupid faggots. Trump campaigned on tariffs and we the people voted for them. Screw these pompous courts!</p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099522296</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 00:33:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099522296</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099522296@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>A federal court has decided to undo Trump's tariffs. Stupid faggots. Trump campaigned on tariffs and we the people voted for them. Screw these pompous courts!</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099521576</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 13:50:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099521576</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099521576@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Pennies are now gone ( well, from production, not existence ).  Now retailers are mandated to round up prices to the next nickle.</p>
<p>Nickels are next ( next year? ). And will be the same mandate here: round up. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I realize its only a few cents ( can we still say that? ) but its the principle, government incrementally forcing price increases. It all adds up, quickly.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099521005</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 15:21:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099521005</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099521005@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>People who claim tariff-supporters are RINOs must have Abraham Lincoln rolling in his grave.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099519599</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 02:16:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099519599</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099519599@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >We NEED to decouple from China!  
  
 We need to restore the balance of trade by blowing up the Three Gorges Dam.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099519596</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 01:29:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099519596</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099519596@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I'm hoping this is just another example of Trump's cabinet members talking out of their asses. I don't know why Trump puts up with that.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099519595</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 01:27:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099519595</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099519595@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>We NEED to decouple from China!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099519593</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 01:21:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099519593</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099519593@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<h1>Bessent: "We Don’t Want Total Decoupling from China"</h1>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Fuck you Bessent.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099519576</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2025 22:45:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099519576</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099519576@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Now there's one I disagree with.  There should be a 1000000000000000000% excise
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099519362</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 15:04:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099519362</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099519362@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>100% tariff proposed for off-shore movies/TV shows.</p>
<p>What is next, books? </p>
<p>Data traffic?</p>
<p>Knowledge? </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099519361</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 14:59:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099519361</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099519361@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Crude oil down to under $57.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099519186</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2025 17:14:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099519186</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099519186@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<blockquote>
<h1 class="headline speakable">Trump says he will not drop tariffs to get China to negotiating table</h1>
</blockquote>
<p>Good.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099519026</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 16:31:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099519026</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099519026@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The bruised knee for jerking gets bigger each cycle? </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099519021</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 16:18:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099519021</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099519021@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[It's funny how the pendulum of politics *increases* its swing as it moves.
 Every administration is a bigger and bigger response to the previous one.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099518472</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 16:40:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099518472</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099518472@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>He only knows how to be a bully.  I hope it blows up in his face. And yes i understand the consequences. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Apr 29 2025 00:38:17 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Mr. Trump knows how to negotiate, particularly with people from other cultures (like Asia for example). Unless we hit another Great Depression I'm going to trust that he knows what he's doing. <br /><br />THe whole point of the tariffs is that others are tariffing the US and it's time to stop let the abuse flow in only one direction. The objective is to bring the tariffs down (preferably to zero) bilaterally. <br /><br />Will it work? I'm not an economist. I'm not even as insightful on economics as LoanShark. But the objective seems pretty clear to me. It's got to be better than just giving away the farm the way others have. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099518391</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2025 00:38:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099518391</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099518391@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Mr. Trump knows how to negotiate, particularly with people from other cultures
(like Asia for example).  Unless we hit another Great Depression I'm going
to trust that he knows what he's doing. 
  
 THe whole point of the tariffs is that others are tariffing the US and it's
time to stop let the abuse flow in only one direction.  The objective is to
bring the tariffs down (preferably to zero) bilaterally. 
  
 Will it work?  I'm not an economist.  I'm not even as insightful on economics
as LoanShark.  But the objective seems pretty clear to me.  It's got to be
better than just giving away the farm the way others have. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099517760</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 19:27:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099517760</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099517760@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Regardless of my personal feelings about tariffs, or being a bully, this will make him appear weak to the world. "push back hard, he will back down" is the message being sent here.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"President Donald Trump signaled Tuesday evening from the Oval Office that the U.S. will ease tariffs on China, saying they’ll “come down substantially” but won’t be eliminated entirely."</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099517228</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 17:12:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099517228</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099517228@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yes, after hours trading is a thing.</p>
<p>Is it right? No. it cuts out the little guy, and how many manipulate the market  in secret, in the process of getting rich(er).</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Apr 12 2025 23:11:54 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>2025-04-06 23:13 from Nurb432 &lt;nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org&gt; <br />Forgetting the thread about the market dropping, saw this today.. i <br />thought the markets were closed on weekends? How does this work? <br /><br />  <br /><br />"Dow futures fall 1,500 points Sunday as Trump tariff market rout <br />escalates" ( and others dropped as well according to that story ) <br /><br /></blockquote>
<br />I always wondered that, too. My best guess is that even though trades are executing, people are still entering or changing orders, so what they're tracking is the bid and ask movement. Same way markets can gap at the open. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099516346</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2025 23:11:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099516346</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099516346@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-04-06 23:13 from Nurb432 <nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org>   
 >Forgetting the thread about the market dropping, saw this today.. i  
 >thought the markets were closed on weekends? How does this work?   
 >  
 >    
 >  
 >"Dow futures fall 1,500 points Sunday as Trump tariff market rout  
 >escalates" ( and others dropped as well according to that story )  
 >  
  
 I always wondered that, too. My best guess is that even though trades are
executing, people are still entering or changing orders, so what they're tracking
is the bid and ask movement. Same way markets can gap at the open. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515888</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2025 02:10:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515888</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515888@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And now Trump caved. Damn it!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515663</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 16:48:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515663</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515663@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Sigh. i know my middle name is typo. But still, sorry. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Apr 08 2025 16:47:00 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>No deal with Israel. Sent Netanyahu home packing on the tariff issue.  If we don't extend a hand to our allies ( especially one in crisis ), we wont be doing it to you enemies. </p>
<p>Buckle up folks, even if Trump pulls out of the 'war' before its too late to recover so we don't crash and burn like i expect, its going to be a long summer.. for everyone other than the elite.   ( so no one around these parts )</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515662</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 16:47:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515662</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515662@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>No deal with Israel. Sent Netanyahu home packing on the tariff issue.  If we don't extend a hand to our allies ( especially one in crisis ), we wont be doing it to you enemies. </p>
<p>Buckle up folks, even if Trump pulls out of the 'war' before its too late to recover so we don't crash and burn like i expect, its going to be a long summer.. for everyone other than the elite.   ( so no one around these parts )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515634</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 13:21:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515634</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515634@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Some billionaire friend of trump:   "there are millions of Chinese sitting at stations screwing in screws to make iPhones" "we hope these tariffs move that to us soil where robots can make it in america it instead"  So basically put poor people out of work there so they starve and become organ donors and fertilizer, and technically not even move the jobs here since they want robots to do it instead. </p>
<p>I think he let the cat out of the bag. Remove all the jobs from the serfs so they die off, and the few that have jobs, price them out of the market. Just the elite and their robots remain. With luck Zoe wont put up with it either, and her and her kind rebel at some point.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515458</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2025 23:41:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Negotiating tariffs</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515458@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Gotta love the news these days.. even without spin, no one agrees on anything ( tho to be fair, Trump does not help much.. )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Apr 06 2025 23:23:31 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Negotiating tariffs</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>But i thought he said he would not negotiate? At least that is <br />what i read that he said. <br /><br /></blockquote>
<br />What I have heard is the plan was to actually negotiate to a point in which tariffs can be bilaterally dialed down to nothingness with Europe, but I have not checked any official source for this. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515457</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2025 23:23:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Negotiating tariffs</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515457@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >But i thought he said he would not negotiate? At least that is  
 >what i read that he said.  
 >  
  
 What I have heard is the plan was to actually negotiate to a point in which
tariffs can be bilaterally dialed  down to nothingness with Europe, but I
have not checked any official source for this. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515456</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2025 23:13:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515456</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515456@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Forgetting the thread about the market dropping, saw this today.. i thought the markets were closed on weekends? How does this work?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"Dow futures fall 1,500 points Sunday as Trump tariff market rout escalates" ( and others dropped as well according to that story )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515434</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2025 17:00:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515434</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515434@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"Trump's top economic adviser says 50 countries have reached out to negotiate tariffs"</p>
<p>But i thought he said he would not negotiate? At least that is what i read that he said.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515338</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 19:05:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Boom goes the stock market.</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515338@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Agreed, but i do think its a canary sort of affair due to the fallout that happens when it goes bad.  ( or good )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Apr 05 2025 16:49:00 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: Boom goes the stock market.</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />The stock market is a very poor way of gauging the state of a country.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515308</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 16:49:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Boom goes the stock market.</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515308@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-04-05 00:22 from Nurb432           
 >Subject: Re: Boom goes the stock market.          
 >Time will tell if it was just a tactic for the rich to get          
 >richer or obliteration of the market totally.           
 >          
 >I personally don't think we will recover.  Its all downhill          
 >from here.          
 >          
          
 The stock market is a very poor way of gauging the state of a country. If
it was, you would have though the US was doing awesomely well for the last
8 years, because every firm on the US based stock markets was worth sooooo
much more than their accountable assets.         
        
 Seriously, some firlms had a market value such that, with the profit margings
they operate, would take 200 years to make a profit. Let that sink in.   
   
      
 People. Were. Buying. Firms. That would have taken **!!200 FUCKING YEARS!!**
TO RECOUP THEIR
MARKET COST.     
    
 That is fucking madness. Everybody with 2 braincells had to know it was not
sustainable, and to be honest, hobby economist have been talking about the
"everything bubble" for some time already.   
  
 But the good news is that a stock market crash does not mean the companies
that crashed are less profitable. If you bought a cookie company that reliabily
sells cookies and pays you your share, then when the stock market crashes
they will keep selling the same cookies and you will still get your share.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515305</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 16:42:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Boom goes the stock market.</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515305@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > And about those tech stocks: that's obviously been an artificial   
 >bubble for a long time. Anyone who was holding NVDA through this past  

 >week is clueless.   
  
 Thanks, zelgomer. We can always count on you to speak sense into a conversation.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515304</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 16:41:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Boom goes the stock market.</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515304@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[     
 Speak for yourself there. I love market crashes because they are the way
to return things to sanity. Seriously, a lot of the stuff that is "crashing"
was actually over-valued (by miles) in the stock market and has dropped down
to being slightly over-valued. A lot of nonUS stocks are dropping for no practical
reason other than panic, some to a point in which their market capitalization
is bellow the value of their accountable assets.     
    
 I am making a killing buying cheap firms whose connection to the US or US
partners is tenuous at best.   
  
 Keep crisis like this coming. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515279</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 13:33:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515279</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515279@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And related but not, and i don't know all the details but looks like Newsom is trying to say that "California isn't DC" and is trying to make deals with other countries and "work around" trumps tariffs. Sounds like hes going to completely ignore the requirements.. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sure states do have clear rights, but that state has a clear pattern and history of blatantly disregarding federal authority which they agreed to abide by, some 174 years ago. This should be a final straw to kick them out of union.  Id vote to extend the wall up northward....</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515278</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 13:18:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Boom goes the stock market.</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515278@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yes i did, however i'm just going off history here. Remember human history is cyclical, even in the 'short term'. Does not have to be across centuries, tho one can learn from that too.( however few people really do )</p>
<p>This time its structured differently, so i see a different outcome. This destruction is intentional, unlike back in the 70s where it was mostly incompetence of response, not upfront intent. This is being run more like things were in the late 20s with malicious intent, and we see how that worked out for us that time.   </p>
<p>I do hope i am wrong, not in the mood to start eating my neighbors for food or finding a wood stove so i don't freeze in a couple of years after the energy grids collapse ( both natural gas an electric ). And i guess ill have to dig that well after all.. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>( PS, i'm not a boomer.  Close, but not quite )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Apr 05 2025 00:24:39 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: Boom goes the stock market.</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Always boomers clutching their pearls. Did you not live through the last 2 decades along with the rest of us? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515227</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 00:24:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Boom goes the stock market.</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515227@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Always boomers clutching their pearls. Did you not live through the last 2
decades along with the rest of us? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515226</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 00:22:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Boom goes the stock market.</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515226@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Time will tell if it was just a tactic for the rich to get richer or obliteration of the market totally.</p>
<p>I personally don't think we will recover.  Its all downhill from here.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515224</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 00:13:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Boom goes the stock market.</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515224@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-04-03 22:05 from Nurb432 <nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org>     
 >Subject: Boom goes the stock market.    
 >Day one Dow index drops 1600+, Nasdaq drops  5.97%..   And i    
 >heard something about 2 Trillion ( with a T ) was pulled out of tech   

 >funds. And bunches of companies hit double digit losses.     
 >    
 >Going to be a long dark summer unless Trump backs off some..    
 >quickly..     
 >    
    
 Oh, come up. It's obviously an astroturfed kneejerk. I was reading about
how it was so bad, even "worse than predicted!!", the mornong before the market
even opened.   
  
 Buy the dip and enjoy the rebound. 
  
 And about those tech stocks: that's obviously been an artificial bubble for
a long time. Anyone who was holding NVDA through this past week is clueless.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515218</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 22:37:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515218</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515218@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>We have a house down the street with that address. Sort of wish i had moved there instead, just for that reason.   </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Apr 04 2025 21:47:51 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">By the way, happy 404 Day. This post is Not Found. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515213</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 21:47:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515213</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515213@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-04-01 21:00 from Nurb432   
 >never mind im an idiot. why am i even reading news on April 1.   
  
 come on man, just let that hang out there and we'll figure out the date was
04-01. 
  
 By the way, happy 404 Day. This post is Not Found. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515211</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 21:12:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515211</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515211@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>2200 by end of day.</p>
<p>Market cant keep this up... </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Apr 04 2025 12:56:58 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Day 2, even before the bell rang for open trade:</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>"Dow Jones Industrial Average futures were down nearly 1,500 points, or 3.6%. Futures on the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq Composite slid 3.7% and 3.9%"</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515196</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 18:10:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515196</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515196@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>On the bright side, the price of oil is falling.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515120</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2025 12:56:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099515120</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515120@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Day 2, even before the bell rang for open trade:</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>"Dow Jones Industrial Average futures were down nearly 1,500 points, or 3.6%. Futures on the S&amp;P 500 and Nasdaq Composite slid 3.7% and 3.9%"</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099515044</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2025 22:05:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Boom goes the stock market.</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099515044@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Day one Dow index drops 1600+, Nasdaq drops  5.97%..   And i heard something about 2 Trillion ( with a T ) was pulled out of tech funds. And bunches of companies hit double digit losses.</p>
<p>Going to be a long dark summer unless Trump backs off some.. quickly..</p>
<p> </p>
<p>“The markets are going to boom. The stock is going to boom. The country is going to boom. And the rest of the world wants to see is there any way they can make a deal,” Trump said.   &lt; - i think he meant "going to GO boom", and "the rest of he world will laugh at us".</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Oh and on top of our egg shortages ( and that idiot wanting to kill off what is left, and have it mutate and become even more deadly.. perhaps even transmissible ) i hear there is a huge world rice shortage too.    Wonder if we are getting to witness the collapse of the planet.     Id bring popcorn, but that is in short supply too.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099514750</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 21:00:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514750</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514750@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>never mind im an idiot. why am i even reading news on April 1.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Apr 01 2025 20:57:06 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>wtf.. really WTF!!!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"Legendary investor Warren Buffett has announced that Berkshire Hathaway will acquire Tesla for a staggering $1 trillion in cash. The 94-year-old “Oracle of Omaha,” long known for his disinterest in tech stocks and electric vehicles, reportedly contacted Elon Musk directly to make the unprecedented offer."</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099514749</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 20:57:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514749</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514749@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>wtf.. really WTF!!!</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"Legendary investor Warren Buffett has announced that Berkshire Hathaway will acquire Tesla for a staggering $1 trillion in cash. The 94-year-old “Oracle of Omaha,” long known for his disinterest in tech stocks and electric vehicles, reportedly contacted Elon Musk directly to make the unprecedented offer."</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099514589</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 15:50:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514589</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514589@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>What will you say when the economic apocalypse doesn't happen? Will you then admit you were wrong?</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Mar 31 2025 15:11:54 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>And for those who don''t understand history or economics and instead think of everything as a political statement since they are unable to see outside their little bubble of ignorance, go back to gradeschool and take a history class. Tariffs and trade restrictions were 2 of the major catalysts for the market collapse and following great depression back in 1929.</p>
<p>( no, im not saying was the only cause, just a huge factor, and of course mostly caused by the government and exasperated by it. Just like we get to see again. )</p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099514578</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 15:11:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514578</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514578@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And for those who don''t understand history or economics and instead think of everything as a political statement since they are unable to see outside their little bubble of ignorance, go back to gradeschool and take a history class. Tariffs and trade restrictions were 2 of the major catalysts for the market collapse and following great depression back in 1929.</p>
<p>( no, im not saying was the only cause, just a huge factor, and of course mostly caused by the government and exasperated by it. Just like we get to see again. )</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099514570</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 14:58:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514570</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514570@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Mar 31 2025 14:54:26 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>yay . Even more tariffs go into effect this week.</p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p>Would you mind licking Xi Jinping's boots someplace else?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099514568</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 14:54:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514568</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514568@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>yay . Even more tariffs go into effect this week.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099513567</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2025 13:08:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Stablecoins</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099513567@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Will be the same here. Expand monitoring and control into the daily lives of serfs.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Mar 23 2025 12:25:07 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: Stablecoins</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;">, an attempt at tyranizing the population</span></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099513561</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2025 12:25:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Stablecoins</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099513561@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-03-22 17:53 from Nurb432     
 >Subject: Re: Stablecoins    
 >I have not, but hes verbally supported some others like ETC and    
 >BTC and wants to 'make them here in the USA'   ( like it    
 >matters, its just freaking math its not really making stuff... )    
 >    
    
 Well I guess the idea would be to have crypto backed by American assets as
a way to make the USD worth something again for international trade.   
  
 I am 100% positive that the Eurocoin is going to be either a joke in bad
taste, an attempt at tyranizing the population, or both. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099513508</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:53:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Stablecoins</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099513508@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have not, but hes verbally supported some others like ETC and BTC and wants to 'make them here in the USA'   ( like it matters, its just freaking math its not really making stuff... )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Mar 22 2025 17:16:54 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Stablecoins</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">I have heard Trump has done something to endorse Stablecoins as a response to the incoming Eurocoin vaporware, but I can't find much information about it. Anybody has a TL;DR for the matter? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099513504</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2025 17:16:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Stablecoins</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099513504@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I have heard Trump has done something to endorse Stablecoins as a response
to the incoming Eurocoin vaporware, but I can't find much information about
it. Anybody has a TL;DR for the matter? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099512897</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 16:35:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Ofshore workers</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099512897@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > So well, I kind of buy your idea of not taking the eurozone as a   
 >threat XD   
  
 the biggest threats are the most desperate people, whoever that may be at
any given time. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099512491</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:10:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Ofshore workers</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099512491@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Long story short, I'm more worried about competition from developing  
        
 >countries--not from the Greeks.           
 >           
 >          
          
 Fair enough.         
        
 Take it witha grain of salt, but as far as I understand, anything medium
sized is done with government/state/county/province funds. This is true to
the point an American company operating in Europe might do so leeching funds
from the administration and in fact I have heard some European headquarters
for American IT exist as a way to get free Euros.       
      
 The main problem with this approach is that companies created under these
regimes don't need to work well. This leads to scenarios in which, let's say,
a politician decides to subsidize horse milk, every farmer and his uncle starts
breeding horses like crazy, and when the politician's plan fails to achieve
its objectives, the funding
is cut and there are hundreds of horse farms left in the dust.     
    
 At which point it sucks to be a horse in such bankrupt farm, unless you end
up being in the 0.001% which gets purchased at a discount by a short, fat,
bearded guy with a hat, suspenders and a Columbo-style trench coat. For example.
  
  
 So well, I kind of buy your idea of not taking the eurozone as a threat XD

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099512476</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2025 22:41:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Ofshore workers</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099512476@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > First things first. Counterintuitively, free trade is the solidarian, 
 
 >progressive thing to do. I would rather have a big country buy all the 
 
 >cereals and vegetables my valley produces rather than send us "aid"   
 >funds.            
  
 Yup. 
  
 With regards to Europe, this is all just off-the-cuff, so take it with a
grain of salt. They're mostly a high-labor-cost region, for all the reasons
you mention. 
  
 (They sit there on their loathsome spotty behinds, squeezing blackheads,
and not caring a tinker's cuss for the... **AHEM, never mind**) 
  
 WTO rules are byzantine, and I don't pretend to understand them, but trading
on WTO terms means committing to less tariffs or face the consequences etc
 
  
 I don't pretend to know to what extent Europe is gaming that system (although
Volkswagen springs to mind immediately.) 
  
 Long story short, I'm more worried about competition from developing countries--not
from the Greeks. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099512331</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 23:31:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Trumpanomics</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099512331@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh stop your free-trade-absolutist libertarian bullshit. Trump's policies are working. Look at this: https://www.foxbusiness.com/lifestyle/ge-aerospace-invest-nearly-1b-us-manufacturing</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong> GE Aerospace to invest nearly $1B in <span style="text-decoration: underline; color: #000080;">US manufacturing</span></strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>And this:</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>Apple also announced that it is committing $500 billion over the next five years, which will involve building an advanced AI server manufacturing factory near <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Houston</span>, as well as doubling the company's Advanced Manufacturing Fund from $5 billion to $10 billion.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>And of course the new TSMC fabs I mentioned earlier.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Mar 10 2025 22:29:12 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: Trumpanomics</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I have a bridge to sell you.   Do you really think those in control will ever let it be temporary when it means more power and money for them to keep it going?  Better get used to suffering, serf.</p>
<p>Human history is one big cycle.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Mar 03 2025 18:59:53 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=fandarel">fandarel</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Trumpanomics</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;"> temporary pain </span></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099512204</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 11:08:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Ofshore workers</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099512204@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-03-08 20:17 from LoanShark               
 > >Why is it unfair trade if it truly costs less to make something,     
          
 >                
 > at some point I will write a small book about how spending a month in 
             
 >India made me more libertarian/classically liberal/Adam               
 >Smithian/capitalist pig or something like that               
 >                
 > short version:               
 > - lower labor costs in developing countries, so it does indeed cost   
           
 >less to make things               
 > - cost of living is indeed somewhat lower in those countries, or can  
            
 >be               
 > - but there's no free lunch: those labor costs are lower in real      
        
 >terms, and the standard of living is lower               
 >                
 > there's a huge reserve army of unemployed people in those places      
   
    
 >("shithole countries"), they just need jobs. and any job, however      
        
 >low-paying, is better than no job in a place were food-truck works make
             
 >50 INR a day.               
 >               
 >              
              
 To be honest, there are two lectures about this.             
            
 First things first. Counterintuitively, free trade is the solidarian, progressive
thing to do. I would rather have a big country buy all the cereals and vegetables
my valley produces rather than send us "aid" funds.          
 In fact I am glad I can work for an American company that pays me American
rates so they can get services that are not on high suply in America as far
as I understand. That is much better than sending me a third-world-support
check paid by taxpayers and then have the American company understaffed. 
       
        
 Now, I understand the
problem comes when Americans buy foreigner wares they could be producing themselves,
because American product is ten times more expensive. As I have said elsewhere,
this points at structural problems within American more often than not. If
producing a tomato in America is more expensive than producing it overseas
and hauling it over across the ocean, then something is wrong in the American
supply chain.       
      
 On the other hand, there is the argument to be made that sometimes your international
trade partners are traitorous motherfuckers that deserve to be nuked. Europe
is the first example I can think of. More than half of Europe is, from a cultural
point of view, openly Anti-American, and their firms are so heavily subsidized
via European funds paid with fraudulent means (such as debt bonds, or hyper-depriced
crappy fiat money) that it does not make much sense to openly deal with
Europe, from a geopolitical perspective.     
    
 Honestly, I think in commerce such as in life, the best strategy is to have
a close network of supporting partners and then try to branch out and reach
new friends as often as possible, but knowing everybody is a motherfucker
until proven otherwise.   
  
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099511976</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 22:29:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Trumpanomics</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099511976@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have a bridge to sell you.   Do you really think those in control will ever let it be temporary when it means more power and money for them to keep it going?  Better get used to suffering, serf.</p>
<p>Human history is one big cycle.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Mar 03 2025 18:59:53 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=fandarel">fandarel</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Trumpanomics</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;"> temporary pain </span></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099511768</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 20:18:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099511768</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099511768@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ *food truck workers, oops 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099511767</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2025 20:17:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099511767</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099511767@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Why is it unfair trade if it truly costs less to make something,  
  
 at some point I will write a small book about how spending a month in India
made me more libertarian/classically liberal/Adam Smithian/capitalist pig
or something like that 
  
 short version: 
 - lower labor costs in developing countries, so it does indeed cost less
to make things 
 - cost of living is indeed somewhat lower in those countries, or can be 
 - but there's no free lunch: those labor costs are lower in real terms, and
the standard of living is lower 
  
 there's a huge reserve army of unemployed people in those places ("shithole
countries"), they just need jobs. and any job, however low-paying, is better
than no job in a place were food-truck works make 50 INR a day. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099510985</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 18:59:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Trumpanomics</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099510985@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Trump's trade policies appear to be bearing fruit.  
  
 I was real skeptical at first - I mean, I didn't want my geek shit to cost
more - but I have to say I agree with your assessment.  And even some temporary
pain for a year or two with the long term goal of making US semiconductor
manufacturing stand on its own 2 legs is a huge win in my opinion. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099510968</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 18:15:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099510968</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099510968@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2025/03/03/trump-set-announce-over-100-billion-investment-taiwanese-company/</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<p>A Taiwanese <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>chip manufacturer</strong></span> will invest over $100 billion in the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>United States</strong></span>, CNN’s Alayna Treene noted in a post on X. A White House official confirmed Treene’s report to Breitbart News.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>The investment is being made by the <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company</strong></span> (<strong>TSMC</strong>), which makes <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">some of the most advanced chips on the planet.</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br /></span></strong></p>
<blockquote>
<p>The investment would be used to build out <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">cutting-edge chip-making facilities.</span></strong> Such an expansion would advance a long-pursued U.S. goal to regrow the domestic semiconductor industry after manufacturing fled largely to Asian countries in recent decades.</p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Trump's trade policies appear to be bearing fruit.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099510514</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2025 21:29:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099510514</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099510514@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Prices set to rise dramatically next week. Tariffs for Canada, Mexico, UK ( i heard 25% ) and increased China taxes start mid-week.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Yay inflation! Stick it to the serfs!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099510135</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Feb 2025 13:12:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099510135</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099510135@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>We will start with a 25% tariff on imported chips, and significantly raise that during the year.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Super.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099506784</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2025 15:25:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099506784</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099506784@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>From our state legislature:   "Opening the door for local governments to start taxing deliveries"      yay ... yet another tax. ( like on local grocery delivery, door dash food, amazon )</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>This really need to stop. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099506780</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Feb 2025 14:49:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099506780</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099506780@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And trade war begins.</p>
<p>Trudeau just announced 25% tariff on US goods, starting tomorrow. And of course Trump promised to raise ours if they retaliated. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099506729</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Feb 2025 23:13:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099506729</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099506729@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Tariffs on Canada and mexico in effect.  Brace yourselves.. Rising prices soon.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and an additional 10% on cheap Chinese stuff )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099506417</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:50:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099506417</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099506417@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"Meta said Wednesday it would pay $25 million to settle a four-year-old lawsuit from President Donald Trump over the social media company’s decision to suspend Trump’s accounts after the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the U.S. Capitol. "</p>
<p> </p>
<p>$25M is lunch money to these people, but ts nice to be able to poke zuckerburg in the eye as a moral victory at least.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and i guess its all going to the future presidential library and pay the attorney bills )</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099506415</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 23:47:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099506415</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099506415@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"Tesla's profits over 70%"</p>
<p>Yes, companies need to make a profit, but if you are making THAT much you are screwing your customers. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099505312</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 19:52:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099505312</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505312@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Normally a 50 dollar switching power supply.   Now its 250 bucks due to the tariffs in place already.</p>
<p>yay . grumble.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099505198</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 02:06:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099505198</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505198@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Lol I forgot I was reading messages backwards and startrd replying to old
posts. Whoops. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099505197</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 02:05:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffs.. long term concerns</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505197@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >business model has been built on selling cheap imports. Are most of  
 >them now going to vanish? If a 15 dollar wrench is now 45 dollars,  
  
 Vanish? No. Backdoor deals will be made, some cocks will be sucked, and carve
outs will happen. We just saw it with TikTok and he hasn't even taken office
yet. The government is literally the mafia just with public consent. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099505196</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2025 02:00:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099505196</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505196@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The real world answer is that tariffs are used as a political chip. The US
is a huge consumer for countries that need the business, so you suck our dick
or we'll hurt your business with tariffs. Ironically this also hurts Americans,
so it's a very puric sort of thing. 
  
 I think the idealist answer is this sort of situation. In the US, we all
agree that forced child labor is bad. In China, they have less of an issue
with it. But to ban such a thing here makes our sneaker manufacturing less
competative with China's, so they impose tariffs to try to artificially level
the playing field. Of course, it doesn't actuslly pan out that way, though,
because nothing the government artificially manipulates ever does. 
  
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099505159</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 14:32:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099505159</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505159@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Sort of a random 'shower thought'.  I cant really express this the way i want, so its sort of random words off the top of my head.</p>
<p>So everyone is screaming about fair trade, imposing sanctions on others for not being 'fair' etc.   Removing all the 'bad stuff' like forced labor, poverty, governmental manipulation, military infiltration, etc.  The reality is that the cost of living is different across the globe, or even across regions in a single country.   </p>
<p>Why is it unfair trade if it truly costs less to make something, and to order them to 'come up to your standards', perhaps even with government mandated price controls which is always bad.  Perhaps your cost of living is not appropriate and is higher than it needs to be, ( due to out of control inflation and not true 'value', for example ) so its really your problem there is an imbalance, not theirs ..   </p>
<p>It all sounds like a fascist globalist movement to me.</p>
<p>( and again, im talking pure math, not bad stuff that can influence prices, even here like we see with inflation and governmental involvement in the markets. That stuff should be addressed of course, but in other ways )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099502144</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2024 20:31:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffs.. long term concerns</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099502144@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099497550</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2024 13:44:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Tariffs.. long term concerns</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099497550@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So i was at harbor freight last night, and it made me think a bit. some random thoughts about the coming tariffs since we know they are now coming since Trump won. And no, this isn't meant to go down the rabbit hole of right/wrong or anything. Just thinking about some of the practical implications for me, an average guy on the street trying to 'make it'. So no 'suck it up and buy American or you are a scumbag communist' debate is intended here..</p>
<p>Like HF, there are many American based companies where there entire business model has been built on selling cheap imports. Are most of them now going to vanish? If a 15 dollar wrench is now 45 dollars, might as well buy the better brand next door at Lowes. And, forget buying a spare, that 10mm socket that is missing, now you will go find it..</p>
<p>What about that 17 dollar disposable T-shirt you get from Walmart, now its 50..  so its not disposable now, and you keep it until it really wears out, and sales volume go down. Not that they go out of business since they do sell more than just imports from china, but do they implode?</p>
<p>What about companies who do primarily make stuff here, but using some parts or raw materials from overseas. ( like car companies, for example )  Same thing, their stuff now skyrockets even more and sales are reduced more as people keep what they have longer or just pass on it totally if its a 'luxury item'. Do they go out of business, do they implode to a fraction of what they used to be, or do we do like we did in the early 2000s and bail them out with free money in the form of tax dollars "since they are too big to fail"?</p>
<p>Similar, what about the farm industry, who does use some imported equipment ( or parts ).. Their operating costs go up, so does the cost of food...Even more than it is now, which is ludicrous. And as we destroy more farm land, or sell to over seas entities.. that only increases food costs for everyone.. and no not my typical rant, just reality of pricing. </p>
<p>How about 'American' companies who see this taking place, and see an opportunity, so they undercut the imported goods to help along the bankruptcies, then skyrocket their prices afterward to make up for the losses of the cost of getting rid of their competition. Not a new tactic, and ya, i know Predatory pricing maneuvers is illegal, but i suspect "American" companies will get a free pass for a while so we will see this happen more. ( and of course, even if you get caught, your competition is gone, so you still win in the long run )</p>
<p>And a the talk about ' getting rid of income taxes and replacing with tariffs '. While it sounds good in a speech, the actual net result from above is we have companies going out of business and average Americans losing their jobs, and we all pay several times more for essentials than we did in insane inflation ( and skipping luxury items ).   Again, not a right/wrong discussion, just the reality of the effects on us not in the 'club'. ( the ones IN the club, they always benefit, or at the least don't feel it, but mostly they find ways to benefit..  )</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ok, random thoughts over.  Back to your regular scheduled program. Im off to the river with the dogs, while its still there. And i get to show my sister where to disperse my ( and my dogs ) ashes when i die, and where the pitch-in lunch is to be. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099497166</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 19:22:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffs</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099497166@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>As long as you have 'elite think' in existence, you dont.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Nov 14 2024 18:47:47 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: Tariffs</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">So it's broken, but it's not ... uniformly broken. How do you fix that? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099497158</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:47:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffs</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099497158@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Much of this, in my opinion, boils down to Americans being spoiled and
 
 >entitled. We want a higher standard of living than the rest of the   
 >world, which translates into "we want higher salaries, in real terms,  

 >for the same work." It's hard to justify.   
  
 To some extent, yes.  The other side of that is the cost of living.  Workers
in other places are paid peanuts, but they can also live on peanuts.  Maybe
not enough peanuts to own a big house and a fast car or whatever, but if we
travel to those places we find that the same amount of money goes much further
there. 
  
 So it's broken, but it's not ... uniformly broken.  How do you fix that?

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099496415</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Nov 2024 15:24:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099496415</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099496415@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>LoL. my EE newsletter . People are freaking out about Trump most likely stopping the free money flow.  ( CHIPS act in this case )  "Bla bla will be using tariffs instead of subsidies to support increased domestic  bla bla bla "</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Oh no..  the gravy train may be derailed.. panic!  </p>
<p>( hint: he will also reduce regulations to help domestic industry by reducing costs )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099495416</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 14:10:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffs</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099495416@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > If  nuts grow in your area and you are still importing them cheaper   
 >than you can produce them that is a sure sign of an endemic problem.   
 >Applying a tariff on nuts won't solve that endemixc problem.   
  
 I agree with this part. 
  
 Maybe I wasn't really disagreeing with *your* point per se, but more broadly
with the newer populist consensus (I say consensus because you're starting
to see it on both the left and the right) that has begun to emerge since 2016
or so. 
  
 Trump put these tariffs into place, Biden kept them, now both parties promise
magic solutions but are short on specifics. With Harris, it's price-fixing
("crack down on price gouging", whatever that means.) Trump has his own magic
promises ("I'll deflate inflation") 
  
 Much of this, in my opinion, boils down to Americans being spoiled and entitled.
We want a higher standard of living than the rest of the world,
which translates into "we want higher salaries, in real terms, for the same
work." It's hard to justify. 
  
 I work in a field (software development) that draws from a global talent
pool. Increasingly, we work remote anyway, so what separates us from the remote
guy in India or the Dominican Republic (other than time zone, but the DR has
the same time zone as us) who gets paid $8 an hour and has THE SAME SKILLSET,
or even better, than the typical American idiot? There's little rational explanation
for the American sense of entitlement. 
  
 But both parties promise to somehow bring back American manufacturing jobs
that haven't existed in 75 years. Our clothing is all made with very-low-wage,
sweatshop labor in Bangladesh, and textile mills in the New England areas
I grew up in have been shuttered for decades because the world has moved on.
Those low-paying jobs are jobs that Americans *don't want.* So both parties
are full of shit. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099494842</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 20:18:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffs</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494842@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > reductive in my opinion. the US has higher labor costs than China.    

 >competetiveness problems get pretty deeply entrenched; we become     
 >victims of our own success, victims of our own high quality of life    

 >standards.     
    
 It isn't reductive. I am of the opinion problems are simple and then we make
them complex by applying complex pseudo-solutions.   
  
 If  nuts grow in your area and you are still importing them cheaper than
you can produce them that is a sure sign of an endemic problem. Applying a
tariff on nuts won't solve that endemixc problem. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099494830</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:50:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffs</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494830@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > I agree on the take against hostile nations, mainly because I have   
 >some experience in boardgames with economic factors and I always find  

 >it funny when somebody sells steel to somebody else, and that somebody 
 
 >else uses the steel to buyld tanks and hit the guy he bought steel   
 >from.   
  
 :-D 
  
 prescient in this day and age, no? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099494829</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:50:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Tariffs</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494829@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > The way for having a healthy domestic economy is not charging   
 >foreigner merchandise, it is fostering a climate in which it is safe to
 
 >run a business.       
  
 reductive in my opinion. the US has higher labor costs than China. competetiveness
problems get pretty deeply entrenched; we become victims of our own success,
victims of our own high quality of life standards. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099494828</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:47:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Tariffs</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494828@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >I disagree with that. There need to be at least some tariffs. I      
 >agree with Trump wanting a baseline tariff on all imports; maybe      
 >it should be less than ten percent but there should be      
 >something. What we should do is phase out all trade with hostile      
 >and/or totalitarian regimes while deregulating at the domestic      
 >level.      
 >      
      
 The way for having a healthy domestic economy is not charging foreigner merchandise,
it is fostering a climate in which it is safe to run a business.     
    
 Seriously, if it is easy to operate a nut production operation in California
you won't need to buy nuts from elsewhere. However, if you make it hard to
produce nuts in California AND apply tariffs on nuts, the end result will
be America won't have nuts.   
  
 I agree on the take against hostile nations, mainly because I have some experience
in boardgames
with economic factors and I always find it funny when somebody sells steel
to somebody else, and that somebody else uses the steel to buyld tanks and
hit the guy he bought steel from. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099494819</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:09:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099494819</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494819@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >I disagree with that. There need to be at least some tariffs. I  
 >agree with Trump wanting a baseline tariff on all imports; maybe  
 >it should be less than ten percent but there should be  
 >something. What we should do is phase out all trade with hostile  
 >and/or totalitarian regimes while deregulating at the domestic  
 >level.  
  
 That's not unreasonable. I think it's a far better option than provoking
retaliation by targeting specific countries with 25% or more. We were thumb-fingered
with the way we targeted China; tariffs on raw materials hurt the domestic
manufacturers we were trying to help. People keep saying "but tariffs can
work if you do them right" -- I'm still waiting for us to do them right. It'll
be better next time, by golly! So they say. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099494369</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:51:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099494369</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494369@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Oct 24 2024 15:18:46 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Tariffs and price controls are two sides of the same coin. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I disagree with that. There need to be at least some tariffs. I agree with Trump wanting a baseline tariff on all imports; maybe it should be less than ten percent but there should be something. What we should do is phase out all trade with hostile and/or totalitarian regimes while deregulating at the domestic level.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099494353</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 19:18:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099494353</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494353@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-08-16 07:44 from Nurb432   
 >And now that they Democrats and their handlers have nearly  
 >destroyed the economy, and inflation is thru the roof they now  
 >have announced their solution:  Price controls.   
 >  
 >Stalin would be proud.   
 >  
 >   
 >  
  
 100%. Kamala is co-opting a bunch of dumb populist economic ideas from the
MAGA camp. Tariffs and price controls are two sides of the same coin. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099494303</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 14:49:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099494303</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494303@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-09-09 21:59 from zelgomer   
 >I mean, that's only a matter of time. It's unrealistic to expect them  

 >to stagnate. This may come off as Nurb432-level black pilled, but if   
 >Wwstern culture can't stay ahead of it, it deserves to die off. We're  

 >below replacement rate, we've destroyed the family unit, we celebrate  

 >depravity and promote destructive lifestyles. If this is representative
 
 >of Western values, it deserves to be overtaken, in tbe Darwinian sense.
 
  
 I agree with about half of this: if Western societies cannot compete, we'll...
have to learn the hard way. Tariffs are of limited use, and the developing
world is catching up with us. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099492025</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Oct 2024 15:44:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099492025</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099492025@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Interestingly it seems it was right after DeSantis sent national guard to run the Florida ports..  Called their bluff, they backed down.</p>
<p>And im sure that the chance for the strike to return mid January is not a coincidence at all.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Oct 03 2024 19:30:21 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>It appears the strike is already over. </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099491745</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2024 23:30:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099491745</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099491745@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It appears the strike is already over. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099491290</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 22:02:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099491290</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099491290@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Port strike starts tomorrow. Lets see if the Biden admin goes back on their word and intervenes.     Regardless, the economic impact is going to be severe, on an already strained economy and its going to strain domestic trucking/etc.   </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099490649</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 22:15:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099490649</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099490649@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-09-24 08:51 from IGnatius T Foobar     
 >Somehow I doubt the ruling class will allow unrealized gains to be     
 >taxed.    
 > The whole "tax the rich" scam is based around raising income taxes and
   
 >getting people to believe that "the rich" have income to tax.  For them
   
 >it's all capital gains, and you never see the elite and their captured 
   
 >politicians talk about significant increases to capital gains tax at   
 
 >the highest levels because that would *actually* affect them.  Taxing  
  
 >unrealized gains would be a million times worse because investments can
   
 >be volatile and lose value before you liquidate them.  Whoever actually
   
 >proposed that probably got slapped with a wet noodle.  If it was     
 >Kommie-la herself then she has no business floating any type of policy 
   
 >whatsoever.     
 >     
 >    
    
 Taxing stuff just because you have
it is not that uncommon. Certainly there are places where you get to pay a
tax if you have more than XXX USD in liquid assets. Basically, if you have
savings beyond a certain point you get taxed for saving up.   
  
 Politicians get away because they have their assets in non taxable form or
they outright have it outside of the reach of their own government. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099490625</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 19:19:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099490625</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099490625@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>My bank ( ok, credit union ) is hosting a 'world economic update webinar' next month.</p>
<p>Um. they have never done this before. wth...</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099490446</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 14:04:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099490446</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099490446@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I also hope and expect that, and suspect this is just trying to fuel fire for the class warfare "i care, elect me" then crickets. Normally i'm not fond of the ruling class protecting themselves, but in this case it helps the rest of us too. But if we are wrong and they want to go full communist on us, we are screwed. </p>
<p>Not that i have a problem with rich people as an entity of course, its all in how they act. Same with poor.. i wont judge a person based on their wealth and income ( or anything else really.. )  but instead on their actions. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099490440</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2024 12:51:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099490440</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099490440@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Somehow I doubt the ruling class will allow unrealized gains to be taxed.
 The whole "tax the rich" scam is based around raising income taxes and getting
people to believe that "the rich" have income to tax.  For them it's all capital
gains, and you never see the elite and their captured politicians talk about
significant increases to capital gains tax at the highest levels because that
would *actually* affect them.  Taxing unrealized gains would be a million
times worse because investments can be volatile and lose value before you
liquidate them.  Whoever actually proposed that probably got slapped with
a wet noodle.  If it was Kommie-la herself then she has no business floating
any type of policy whatsoever. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099489651</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2024 17:20:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099489651</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099489651@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>May be hot air, as you never know until rubber hits the road, but a couple of billionaires are threatening to pull their money out of the stock market if Harris gets in office, due to the plan for ' tax on unrealized gains'.</p>
<p>Them dropping out  might crash the market and kick an already collapsing economy in the knees. The taxes may finish off the economy as i don't care what they say, those taxes will hit us ALL, hard..  Own a house? guess what.. taxes, even if you never plan to sell ( now you may be forced to if your income is low ).. Own a classic car, tax.  Own some collectibles, don't get caught with them or pay up. Hell, even guns and ammo are increasing in value, so tax on that too.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099489120</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Sep 2024 19:14:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099489120</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099489120@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>While we all know modern 'higher education' is a big fraud anyway, i guess sally mae ( recently 're-branded', so you know what that means.... ) finally got caught screwing people over.  They would 'steer students to higher cost loans" and other related scams.  So they are now banned from student loans ( not sure to what extent ) and have to pay out 100M + to those they screwed over. Plus some fines too.</p>
<p>With luck they go under and their board of directors are taken out back.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099486397</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2024 20:53:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099486397</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099486397@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-08-24 12:01 from IGnatius T Foobar   
 >Take a look at what kind of people they bring out to talk about price  

 >caps.  
 > You might notice that anyone who says it's a good idea is not an   
 >economist.   
 >   
 >  
  
 I don't believe in economists. I believe in 20 years of food scarcity produced
because some lameass Commander who decided to play Ruler of the Land around
this place set price caps and caused nobody to want to sell food at a loss.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099486276</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2024 16:01:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099486276</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099486276@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Take a look at what kind of people they bring out to talk about price caps.
 You might notice that anyone who says it's a good idea is not an economist.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099485195</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 14:06:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099485195</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099485195@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>*ism never worked in the past because we didn't implement it, ours will work!</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Aug 17 2024 09:58:44 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">That rings a bell sooooo much. <br /><br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099485194</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2024 13:58:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099485194</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099485194@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-08-16 07:44 from Nurb432     
 >And now that they Democrats and their handlers have nearly    
 >destroyed the economy, and inflation is thru the roof they now    
 >have announced their solution:  Price controls.     
 >    
 >Stalin would be proud.     
 >    
    
 That rings a bell sooooo much.   
  
 Please, somebody tell the whole population that the way post WWII famine
in Germany was ended was by having Ludwig Erhard deregulate prices so food
could be distributed without restrictions. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099485038</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2024 11:44:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099485038</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099485038@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And now that they Democrats and their handlers have nearly destroyed the economy, and inflation is thru the roof they now have announced their solution:  Price controls.</p>
<p>Stalin would be proud.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099474093</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 15:26:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099474093</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099474093@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And just this week:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"We have declared your area to be part of the local 'watershed' so we are tacking on additional fees. They are not technically a tax on your property based on value, so deal with it, losers"</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu May 02 2024 14:53:27 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>"so legally property taxes are capped at a % so we cant raise it anymore. but we can fake the appraisal and make it more... hahahah pay us moar!!!!! "</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099473723</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 22:44:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099473723</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099473723@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2024/05/29/u-s-tariffs-on-china-help-rescue-american-textile-companies-from-ruin/</p>
<p>Trump 1, economists (morons) 0</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"Trump has vowed to impose across-the-board tariffs on all foreign imports to protect American manufacturing and workers from low-wage countries".</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sounds good to me.</p>
<p>Of course economists will predict an apocalypse. I can't wait to see that not happen.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099466967</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 18:53:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099466967</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099466967@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"so legally property taxes are capped at a % so we cant raise it anymore. but we can fake the appraisal and make it more... hahahah pay us moar!!!!! "</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099466645</link><pubDate>Tue, 30 Apr 2024 08:43:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099466645</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099466645@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[So, my father has asked me if Supermicro's hype in economic ezines makes any
sense. Since I am not familiar I will forward the question here. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099466234</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 13:24:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099466234</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099466234@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[That'll never fly.  Cap gains is where the ultra-wealthy *actually* make their
money.  Raise income tax "on the rich" all you want, but it really only impacts
the middle class.  Raise the tax on investment income ... now the people who
own you are impacted and you have a problem. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099466227</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:37:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099466227</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099466227@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"take all the money"</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"Biden proposes nearly 45% capital gains tax rate"</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099465118</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 11:40:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099465118</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099465118@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That wont happen as long as there is government. They work hand in hand to fleece us.</p>
<p>"not your fathers union "</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Apr 18 2024 23:33:11 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">busts up the unions. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099465042</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2024 03:33:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099465042</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099465042@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[So all we have to do to keep the robots from taking over is turn everything
into sweatshops?  I'm ok with that if it finally busts up the unions. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099463324</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Apr 2024 19:53:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099463324</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099463324@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-04-12 19:17 from Nurb432     
 >So California passed that law where food workers get a bazillion    
 >dollars per hour pay.   And they are acting surprised as prices    
 >have skyrocketed, people are being laid off, restaurants closing, and  
 
 >people being replaced by robots.  ( coming soon, robot tax.. )    
 >    
    
 From the point of view of the employer, an abusive robot tax is preferable
because robots don't have gender identity crisis, they don't go on strike,
and if they die in an accident you don't get half as much bad press.   
  
 A friend of mine was hired to make some optimizations in a production chain
in some Asian factory not long ago. He arrived there with the typical Western
mindset - which means optimizing the prod chain equals removing people because
of the reasons above. He changed mind in a week. Workers there didn't complain,
didn't go on strikes, and the economical gain of replacing them was negligible.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099450649</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 23:17:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099450649</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099450649@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So California passed that law where food workers get a bazillion dollars per hour pay.   And they are acting surprised as prices have skyrocketed, people are being laid off, restaurants closing, and people being replaced by robots.  ( coming soon, robot tax.. )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099448926</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:29:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099448926</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099448926@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And to add, they had to publish some document as part of the approval process.  Their reasoning is that demand is down.   But at the same time, their costs are less..  </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ya, they paid someone off.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099448803</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Apr 2024 17:06:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099448803</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099448803@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-04-04 19:09 from Nurb432   
 >Boooo local power company wants to raise rates 16%   
  
 I offgridded my house and switched to horse poo for home heating for precisely
that reason. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099425747</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 12:08:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099425747</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099425747@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I guess a bunch of tax cuts and stuff that Trump put into place, expire this year. Not sure the effective rate after everything is taken into account ( trickle down ) but supposed to be enough to 'feel'.</p>
<p>Of course they could be extended, but this admin wont do that. They love destroying us and taking all we have.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099380108</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2024 23:09:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099380108</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099380108@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Boooo local power company wants to raise rates 16%</p>
<p>Does not sound like a lot, but its incremental. little by little nickle and dimeing us.  And for people really struggling and barely getting by, an extra 50 bucks a month hurts. Plus all the trickle up effects, due to costs of doing business.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099374170</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jan 2024 12:36:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099374170</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099374170@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So over extended, bankrupt Chinese based Evergrande was told by HK court to liquidate any holdings in HK.</p>
<p>Sure they cant directly effect the parent company in China ( which is sort of funny, china says they are part of HK, yet they wont honor a court decision there . )  but it will still have a massive financial impact on the mainland, and ripple across the planet like it did when they basically went upside down. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099374062</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jan 2024 13:02:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099374062</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099374062@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Amazon, Target, Walmart, Lowes, $25 for an item ( was trying to avoid shipping and waiting so looking around local stores too ). Kmart, while no longer have any stores that i know of, popped up in the search, and for the same exact thing, $112, on sale for $67.. wtf. no wonder they are dead.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099370630</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2023 18:34:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370630</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370630@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>there is no election</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Dec 08 2023 09:54:44 AM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Yes of course, there is no burger, there is no restaurant, and there is no spoon. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099370616</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2023 14:54:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370616</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370616@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes of course, there is no burger, there is no restaurant, and there is no
spoon. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099370271</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2023 22:06:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370271</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370271@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>You assume there is a burger at all.  Most likely the restaurant has collapsed, closed down so it does not exist to cook the burger you cant afford. </p>
<p>:)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099370270</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2023 22:01:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370270</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370270@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > When you get to that point, no one knows what the money is worth.  A  

 >hamburger and a private jet both cost a hundred zillion dollars, and   
 >you buy the hamburger because you are starving.   
 >   
 >  
  
 Actually, you don't buy the burguer because you don't have the money. Your
adquisitive power was destroyed, so you steal the burguer instead 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099370255</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2023 15:33:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370255</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370255@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And you burn bills to keep from freezing in the winter. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Dec 03 2023 09:19:07 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">When you get to that point, no one knows what the money is worth. A hamburger and a private jet both cost a hundred zillion dollars, and you buy the hamburger because you are starving. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099370250</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2023 14:19:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370250</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370250@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > At that point you end up printing moar money to pay your unpayable   
 >debt, crashing your currency Weimar Republic style, so you don't really
 
 >go ever bankrupt but your people starves because a potato is worth now 
 
 >ten million dollar.   
  
 When you get to that point, no one knows what the money is worth.  A hamburger
and a private jet both cost a hundred zillion dollars, and you buy the hamburger
because you are starving. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099369677</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 17:25:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369677</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369677@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Idiot, or agenda?</p>
<p>I rarely see true idiocy in government. Its just that evil intent/agendas often times appears as idiocy to us lowly citizens, since we re not part of their equation.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Nov 24 2023 11:57:52 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=msgrhys">msgrhys</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>We need the gold standard back. Nixon was an idiot.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099369674</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 16:57:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369674</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369674@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>We need the gold standard back. Nixon was an idiot.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099369630</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2023 00:01:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369630</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369630@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2023-11-23 14:01 from Nurb432   
 >Long ago I have heard the same about % of ownership. But as time has  
 >gone on, i question if that is still true. Not sure where the facts  
 >are published, or if they're obfuscated enough not to really get  
 >anything useful from it.   
 >  
 >    
 >  
 >And ya, china is in a rough spot too which is even more reason to  
 >call in their chips and demand payment.   
 >  
  
 The issue with owing debts t your own citizens is that if you default then
your citizens don't get paid and local industry gets bankrupt and people starves
and the government starves and then Mexico invades and you all end up eating
cocaine and tequila. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099369629</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 23:59:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369629</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369629@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > So theoretically you go next to AA, then to A, B, C, and D, before it 
   
 >all goes to hell.  Theoretically that means along the way, bond buyers 
   
 >become more hesistant to buy government debt because it's not the     
 >guaranteed payback it once was.  What happens next is anyone's guess,  
  
 >but it can't be good.     
 >      
 > The point however, is that we don't simply take out a loan from the   
 
 >Bank of China every time we want more money.  It's far more complicated
   
 >than that.    
 > And also the Chinese government isn't exactly in the greatest of     
 >financial shape either.     
 >     
 >    
    
 What happens when your credit rating goes to trash is not that you stop selling
debt. What happens is you sell the same debt, but more expensive. INstead
of selling it for a 3% interest you sell it for a 30% interest and the sort
of people who buys it stops being
regular nice investors but high risk takers and motherfuckers you don't want
to deal with.   
  
 At that point you end up printing moar money to pay your unpayable debt,
crashing your currency Weimar Republic style, so you don't really go ever
bankrupt but your people starves because a potato is worth now ten million
dollar. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099369609</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 19:01:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369609</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369609@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Long ago I have heard the same about % of ownership. But as time has gone on, i question if that is still true. Not sure where the facts are published, or if they're obfuscated enough not to really get anything useful from it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And ya, china is in a rough spot too which is even more reason to call in their chips and demand payment. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099369600</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Nov 2023 18:23:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369600</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369600@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Somewhere i read that we are now paying 1 trillion a year in interest  
 >payments.  What happens when the economy collapses and the feds cant  
 >suck enough of our income out of our pockets and we default?    
  
 Before answering that question, it would be nice to see a breakdown of who
owns all of the current debt. 
  
 I have head it said [by whom?] that the largest holder of US government debt
is the public itself.  I have to assume that means it's in things like savings
bonds.  I also don't know the mechanics of how we borrow money from foreign
governments -- do we just ask them to buy our bonds? 
  
 We don't anticipate a sudden collapse.  Last summer, Fitch Ratings downgraded
US "issuer default rating" from AAA to "AA+".  In their statement, they said
"In Fitch's view, there has been a steady deterioration in standards of governance
over the last 20 years, including on fiscal
and debt matters" and went on to imply that they were *not* impressed by what
had just recently happened then, which was the unipartisan agreement to suspend
the debt limit until January 2025. 
  
 So theoretically you go next to AA, then to A, B, C, and D, before it all
goes to hell.  Theoretically that means along the way, bond buyers become
more hesistant to buy government debt because it's not the guaranteed payback
it once was.  What happens next is anyone's guess, but it can't be good. 
  
 The point however, is that we don't simply take out a loan from the Bank
of China every time we want more money.  It's far more complicated than that.
 And also the Chinese government isn't exactly in the greatest of financial
shape either. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099369041</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 16:41:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369041</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369041@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2023-11-15 09:39 from Nurb432   
 >What i mean mostly is i dont think we put up collateral ( how could  
 >we? ), so when we default and the others country flip us the bird  
 >demanding money, what physically happens beyond us looking ( more )  
 >stupid? Do we just flip the bird back and walk? Do we just dismiss  
 >what they owe us and call it even? file in some international court  
 >for bankruptcy, and then take down the planet with us?   
 >  
 >    
 >  
 >   
 >  
  
 What happens is "If you want us to forget your debts, give us Taiwan, or
else..." 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099369033</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 14:39:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369033</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369033@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>What i mean mostly is i dont think we put up collateral ( how could we? ), so when we default and the others country flip us the bird demanding money, what physically happens beyond us looking ( more ) stupid? Do we just flip the bird back and walk? Do we just dismiss what they owe us and call it even? file in some international court for bankruptcy, and then take down the planet with us?</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099369031</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2023 14:21:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369031</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369031@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2023-11-14 16:59 from Nurb432   
 >Somewhere i read that we are now paying 1 trillion a year in interest  
 >payments.  What happens when the economy collapses and the feds cant  
 >suck enough of our income out of our pockets and we default?    
 >  
  
 What happens is Biden is replaced by a Chinesse puppet. An **official** puppet,
instead of an unofficial one, I mean. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099368995</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 21:59:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368995</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368995@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Somewhere i read that we are now paying 1 trillion a year in interest payments.  What happens when the economy collapses and the feds cant suck enough of our income out of our pockets and we default?  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099368907</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2023 22:34:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368907</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368907@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I'd prefer lawyers, guns and money, but yea. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099368688</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 13:05:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368688</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368688@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Or just buy lots of ammo, cigarettes and booze. You can trade smokes and booze for food and supplies. And if they refuse, you have plan b, ammo.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Oh and moving out to the country, helps too. Cities during a collapse, stink. Both literally and figuratively.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099368686</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 12:50:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368686</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368686@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2023-11-08 12:32 from IGnatius T Foobar         
 >So what, then, is considered long term stable?  Massive deflation makes
       
 >non-liquid assets worthless, massive inflation makes liquid assets     
   
 >worthless.  Our economic system is based on the idea that we want our  
      
 >assets to appreciate.         
        
 Non liquid assets that are useful will be useful in both scenarios. I think
we have forgotten that.       
      
 If you have a corn field, you will eat as much corn as you want and you may
ever sell or exchange the corn at whatever price you can get a given year.
    
    
 THe theory with massive deflation is that you'd rather hold currency instead
of using the currency to set a corn field, based on the assumption that you
will be able to buy corn from your currency savings. I don't think the assumption
holds because if everybody has the same idea, corn supply
is not guaranteed. Game theory is you go and set your corn field because even
if the market value of your field crashes you will be happily eating corn.
  
  
 I am making the point of liquidating my liquid assets and turning the money
into means of production for things that are directly useful to me precisely
because you can no longer depend on the stability of The System to give value
to your stuff. Set an okra processing facility at home and you won't care
for the price of okra ever again, period. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099368551</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 17:32:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368551</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368551@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[So what, then, is considered long term stable?  Massive deflation makes non-liquid
assets worthless, massive inflation makes liquid assets worthless.  Our economic
system is based on the idea that we want our assets to appreciate. 
  
 I've heard it said (wikipedophilia would add "[by whom?]") that "a little
bit of inflation is good" and that might be because we want our assets to
appreciate while we are holding them. 
  
 During periods of natural prosperity, there is some inflation that happens
naturally, but it is manageable.  It's difficult to argue that massively expanding
the money supply for government spending sprees is healthy, though. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099368523</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 13:32:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368523</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368523@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 This is completely un-controversial for anyone who studied the Great Depression.

  
 Not really applicable under present high-interest-rate conditions though,
I'll admit. The low-interest-rate historical moment has come and gone (at
least for now) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099368343</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 17:58:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368343</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368343@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2023-10-31 15:40 from LoanShark   
 >    
 > more than just that, a deflationary environment is, in the long run,  

 >financially unstable because banks would be better off holding currency
 
 >than lending it. it causes problems for the bank balance sheet and you 
 
 >don't want the universal waves of bankruptcy that may result.   
 >    
  
 You can also argue that inflationary environments are finantially unstable
in the long run because the banks are better off lending off currency instead
of holding it. You'd also have an advantage with that argument because the
proof is in the pudding already. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099367903</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 19:40:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099367903</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099367903@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 more than just that, a deflationary environment is, in the long run, financially
unstable because banks would be better off holding currency than lending it.
it causes problems for the bank balance sheet and you don't want the universal
waves of bankruptcy that may result. 
  
 also, if you have stock market assets, it would affect them too. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099367740</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Oct 2023 23:40:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099367740</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099367740@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >"You don't want deflation" is something economists say, but I'm not    
 >sure I believe it. Economists also think trade with Communist China    
 >created more jobs than it destroyed, which is total BS.    
    
  
 (^^^ from the political mudslinging room ^^^) 
  
 While I mostly agree with you, the basic argument against deflation is that
if you are holding non-liquid assets, they become worth less in terms of whatever
currency you are currently using.  For most mortals, however, the only holding
they might have that makes a difference in this way would be their house,
if they are a homeowner. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099366878</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2023 12:53:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099366878</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366878@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Lets kill their economy even more.   I think burger flippers are at 20 now..  These people are idiots.</p>
<p><a><span class="navbar_link"> </span></a></p>
<p>https://californiahealthline.org/news/article/california-lawmakers-approve-nation-leading-25-minimum-wage-for-health-workers/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352781</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 13:27:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352781</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352781@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[They've busted things like that before.  Back in the 1980s we had a lot of
boats here in NY and elsewhere that said "Dover, DE" or "Wilmington, DE" on
the transom.  That's because it was cheaper to start a Delaware corporation
than to pay sales tax on the boat.  Eventually the PRNY cracked down and forced
everyone to pay their sales tax anyway. 
  
 So I don't expect there to be such a loophole for emissions, especially when
it would be a blasphemy against the official government religion.  But it
would be cool if such a thing existed.  Set up a holding company in northern
Texas just to own and register vehicles that are operated in other states.
 They could call it the Dallas Multipass.  :) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352425</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2023 17:49:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352425</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352425@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Rent a PO box, tell people that is your address? Or one of those ' mail drops' where they give you an address and what is effectively a 'room number' that makes it look like an apartment complex.  Perhaps even do mail forwarding.   Local UPS store used to do that here with the 'drop box'.  Donno if its a 'legal address' or just a 'front to use' but... </p>
<p>     </p>
<p>Related im sure people who have decided to live in their RV full time have the same problem. They have no 'dirt' to call home. for voting, taxes, drivers license..  So whatever they do i bet would work.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Aug 05 2023 11:30:51 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Gosh, it would be great if there were some sort of service in Texas that allowed you to register a vehicle there and drive it in your own state. Kind of like the Delaware shell corporations everyone opens to avoid sales tax. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352407</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Aug 2023 15:30:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352407</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352407@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Gosh, it would be great if there were some sort of service in Texas that allowed
you to register a vehicle there and drive it in your own state.  Kind of like
the Delaware shell corporations everyone opens to avoid sales tax. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352334</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Aug 2023 18:17:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352334</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352334@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Bexar County (pronounced Bear County) is not a clean-air county.  What does that mean?  It means the county doesn't give a shit if you remove the emissions controls on your vehicle.  That's the reason a lot of people do a DEF-Delete on their shiny new burnatron-powered trucks.  What happens if one of these vehicles goes to one of the VERY FEW clean-air counties Texas does have?  Well, the vehicle is registered in a non-clean-air county so they can't do shit about it.</p>
<p>Yes, people do bring these vehicles all over the US.  If you've seen a burnatron-powered truck with Texas plates, there's a pawsibility it doesn't have that stupid DEF system.  Not a damn thing your state can do about it either, because where the vehicle is registered, it's legal.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Aug 03 2023 19:22:35 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Yeah, right. This is the People's Republic of New York, where we get yearly emissions tests and they send Greta to your house to scream at you for a week if you don't pass. It won't be long before they outlaw explodatron-powered cars altogether. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352275</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 23:22:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352275</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352275@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, right.  This is the People's Republic of New York, where we get yearly
emissions tests and they send Greta to your house to scream at you for a week
if you don't pass.  It won't be long before they outlaw explodatron-powered
cars altogether. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352270</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 22:34:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352270</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352270@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I would not be too concerned about other issues. Those things are far too thin, get far to hot.. They just cant last long.</p>
<p>Best solution is to lose the converter, better gas mileage, less cost..  But i know, in some states that is easier said than done.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Aug 03 2023 05:14:08 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br /><br />To make matters worse, there are now literally parts falling off the bottom of my truck. I heard a rattle that I couldn't locate, and yesterday the heat shield for the catalytic converter fell off on the highway and I ran over it with the back wheel. <br /><br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352259</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 21:15:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352259</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352259@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Supposedly this is only the second time in history that the US  
 >dollar/credit rating has been downgraded, from AAA to AA+.   
  
 And both times it was in response to bad fiscal policy from the same bunch
of asswipes. 
  
 Quite frankly, we deserve it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352258</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 21:14:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352258</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352258@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Non-replayable payment options are awesome.  It's the reason I prefer to use
PayPal when I can.  They can do automatic repeating payments if you want to,
but YOU control when they stop. 
  
 To make matters worse, there are now literally parts falling off the bottom
of my truck.  I heard a rattle that I couldn't locate, and yesterday the heat
shield for the catalytic converter fell off on the highway and I ran over
it with the back wheel. 
  
 But the extra amount they want me to pay them is an order of magnitude greater
than the cost of the replacement part, so I'll be ordering that part and installing
it myself.  And of course, a 1-star review on Yelp to share my story. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352237</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 14:29:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352237</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352237@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Sounds like a refillable gift card. Which is a good idea actually.. Get 3 of those, just put in enough to pay the bill.. Rotate them around.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Aug 03 2023 10:20:13 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">I have heard of something similar, called wallet-cards. They are debit cards you need to charge with money. The idea is that if you intend to expend 30 bucks, you charge 30 bucks and then use the card. If they try to charge 60 bucks the operation is denied. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352235</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 14:20:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352235</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352235@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2023-08-02 10:09 from nonservator   
 >They're called "virtual credit cards" and the idea is you just spin  
 >one up for temporary/one-time use without risking your actual card  
 >info. Like everything that isn't cash or precious metals, it's all  
 >fake and gay, but they can be useful.  
 >  
  
 I have heard of something similar, called wallet-cards. They are debit cards
you need to charge with money. The idea is that if you intend to expend 30
bucks, you charge 30 bucks and then use the card. If they try to charge 60
bucks the operation is denied. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352217</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2023 12:30:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352217</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352217@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Supposedly this is only the second time in history that the US dollar/credit rating has been downgraded, from AAA to AA+. CNN, naturally, blames "debt ceiling madness and the Jan 6 insurrection", while BIden's nappy-headed spokeslesbian of course blames the Bad Orange Man.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352157</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 18:35:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352157</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352157@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Right, i think that is the only downside to blowing them off at this point. But since they are small shop and not a large chain to be banished from, no great loss.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Aug 02 2023 01:30:26 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br /><br />Obviously I can never go there again without them seeing me in their computer as someone they believe has a balance due, </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352156</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 18:33:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352156</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352156@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>You would have difficulty around here doing that. Even using the "tap and pay" stuff in some cards.. not here.  You will be inserting plastic, or feeding people cash, or you wont be driving/eating/etc.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Aug 02 2023 01:02:28 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LadySerenaKitty">LadySerenaKitty</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<p>I use phone-based payments exclusively.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352153</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 17:30:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352153</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352153@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The issuing bank for my credit card only texts me to verify transactions if
they are unusual, such as a particularly large amount or a location they didn't
expect me to be in. 
  
 Here's my current thinking, after I've had some time to reflect upon the
situation: 
  
 I paid using physical plastic at the point of sale.  According to PCI DSS
requirement 3.2 (it helps to be in the compliant hosting business) a merchant
is not permitted to store the CVV after an authorization has been completed.
 This would seem to imply that they would not be able to complete a card-not-present
transaction without my consent. 
  
 Obviously I can never go there again without them seeing me in their computer
as someone they believe has a balance due, but I don't care.  I get all of
my automotive service from a local shop that I trust.  I suppose if they're
really ambitious they could try sending it to a bill collector. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352147</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 17:02:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352147</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352147@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It's been YEARS since I carried my physical cards with me, the exception being the company-issued cards to be used on Order and Pay orders.</p>
<p>I use phone-based payments exclusively.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Aug 02 2023 11:16:49 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>To be fair, in person, most places require you to wave plastic at them, not just give them some random numbers. </p>
<p>Having that one-use option in person ( or the pre-approval idea ) would be nice. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Aug 02 2023 11:14:12 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=nonservator">nonservator</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>It's like they keep trying to come up with more ways to waste physical resources.</p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352139</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 15:16:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352139</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352139@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>To be fair, in person, most places require you to wave plastic at them, not just give them some random numbers. </p>
<p>Having that one-use option in person ( or the pre-approval idea ) would be nice. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Aug 02 2023 11:14:12 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=nonservator">nonservator</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>It's like they keep trying to come up with more ways to waste physical resources.</p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352138</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 15:14:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352138</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352138@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It's like they keep trying to come up with more ways to waste physical resources.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352130</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 14:28:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352130</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352130@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Right, but this one would even give you a physical piece of one-use plastic if you need it.  </p>
<p>What id like is for the ability to have a 2nd card be 'pre approval only'. ( i think having the primary do that would be a pita.. i could be wrong tho )  You login via your banks app/page, and you pre-approve x amount for y vendor for each transaction. Anything beyond that, is rejected instantly.  </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Aug 02 2023 10:09:06 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=nonservator">nonservator</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>They're called "virtual credit cards" and the idea is you just spin one up for temporary/one-time use without risking your actual card info. Like everything that isn't cash or precious metals, it's all fake and gay, but they can be useful.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352127</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 14:09:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352127</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352127@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>They're called "virtual credit cards" and the idea is you just spin one up for temporary/one-time use without risking your actual card info. Like everything that isn't cash or precious metals, it's all fake and gay, but they can be useful.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352122</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 13:17:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352122</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352122@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I dont know which one it is, and i know it would not have been your first thought in this case, but i saw some bank out there will issue a 'one use' CC numbers or card.   That way if you need to do something you are not 100% sure about ( like from an online vendor or some random flea market ) you can at least prevent them from stealing the numbers. They just wont work a 2nd time. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352081</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Aug 2023 00:52:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352081</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352081@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, I called the credit card company this morning, they said they can't
proactively block a merchant. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352053</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 22:10:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352053</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352053@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I'm not an attorney, but i believe you are in the right. If the transaction is complete, they can only ask for more, cant demand it.  Here i think there are lower limit for small claims court.  ( something like 2k ) to prevent nonsense like that.</p>
<p>However, if you used a CC/bank card, may want to call the bank before they attempt to just 'take it' from you. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099352047</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 22:02:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352047</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352047@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 And now for a micro-economic question. 
  
 Dear Lazyweb: 
  
 Today I received a call from a merchant, an automobile dealership at which
I had some service done on my truck.  I normally go to my friendly neighborhood
mechanic shop, with whom I have a good and trusting relationship, but in this
case I had to get some recall work done, and while it was there I agreed to
have some other work done that they pointed out it needed. 
  
 The call was regarding an error they made in my favor.  They did not charge
my credit card the proper amount, and now they want to collect the remainder.
 The amount is in the hundreds of US Dollars. 
  
 Where does that place me from a legal perspective?  Do they have a legal
claim to the remainder after I have left the place of business, with both
parties having believed the transaction was complete?  I told them I was away
from home and put off further discussion, and then blocked their number. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099336220</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 22:15:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099336220</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099336220@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And we are going to see it, whatever happens really damned soon.. Pace is accelerating. They are running out of time.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Apr 20 2023 06:04:55 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"> These are weird times, however, and anything is possible. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099336216</link><pubDate>Thu, 20 Apr 2023 22:04:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099336216</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099336216@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The sack of poopy pants currently sitting in the white house has little to
do with it.  Even if there were a desire to go "fully digital" the transactions
would still be denominated in US Dollars.  Cash would be phased out by first
requiring in-person commerce to be conducted using electronic payments only,
and eliminating cash withdrawals from banks and automatic teller machines.
 Eventually the only thing one would be able to do with cash would be to deposit
it in a bank in exchange for an electronic credit.  At the end of the phaseout,
most bank branches would stop accepting cash deposits and if you found some
old cash sitting around you'd have to go to a main bank branch or some sort
of special exchange center to deposit it. 
  
 However ... I don't think that will happen because the most notorious money
launderers are also our lawmakers. 
  
 More importantly: eliminating PHYSICAL CASH
is not the same thing as eliminating a CURRENCY. 
  
 What we are really talking about here is a potential decline of international
transactions being conducted in US Dollars, even when neither party uses the
USD as their native currency.  This practice came into existence partially
because of US hegemony in the First World, but also because it has traditionally
been an exceptionally stable currency, and therefore a reasonable standard
against which to reference other currencies. 
  
 So it is no surprise that the push to eliminate the petrodollar is coming
from the Second World.  Nations occupied by commies and/or jihadi will naturally
want to remove any leverage the US has over their transactions by trading
in one of their native currencies.  With the value of the US Dollar currently
in freefall, now would be an ideal time for them to attempt such a change.

  
 Will they succeed?  As
LS has pointed out, historical precedent says it is not likely.  These are
weird times, however, and anything is possible.  I'm not about to convert
my current holdings to Bitcoin *or* Yuan, though. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099334016</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 23:29:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099334016</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099334016@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Normally id agree, but the process has started, and is accelerating. Its being fueled from within this time, as this admin wants us on a digital currency, so the rules are different now, and with internal forces to make it collapse, i think it will.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Apr 10 2023 05:25:53 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />the rumors of the USD's immanent death have been around as long as I have been alive, and are greatly exaggerated. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099333999</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 21:25:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099333999</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099333999@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 the rumors of the USD's immanent death have been around as long as I have
been alive, and are greatly exaggerated. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099333341</link><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 22:18:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099333341</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099333341@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, I'm trying to figure out whether the "pop econ" interpretation of that
sentiment is correct.  Theoretically it makes the US Dollar less valuable
as a worldwide reserve currency.  I suppose that means the worst case scenario
is that all of those inflated dollars end up coming back to the US and the
rest of the world stops caring? 
  
 To me that sounds like it would be quite painful for the US in the short
term because as long as the government just keeps inflating the currency to
pay for things, the rate of inflation will increase as the global value of
those dollars decreases.  It also seems as if after we get past that, the
government would have to stop inflating the currency to pay for things, for
the exact same reason. 
  
 IANAE 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099332131</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Mar 2023 19:11:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099332131</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099332131@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Brazil and china no longer going to use USD for trade.</p>
<p>Collapse eminent... </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099331736</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 21:24:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099331736</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099331736@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not a lot of detail but the fed is trying to push some concept of  "send all your electronic payments thru us, its fast and efficient."</p>
<p>Step one of getting them to hold the national crypto i bet. Or at the least a central national bank.  Either are bad.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099331731</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2023 20:51:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099331731</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099331731@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Back to the earlier thread about TIPS bonds, I just learned of something
similar today which may be more suited to individual investors: Series I bonds,
these are also inflation protected. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099330978</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2023 16:22:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099330978@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Banking crises are more deflationary than inflationary, because they tend
to trigger a flight to perceived safe assets and away from risky investments.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099330520</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2023 20:16:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099330520@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That was the intent. But once they realized they could control the entire chain on a crypto of their making, that sort of changes the game.</p>
<p>All they really have to do is assign wallet addresses to people,  create an approved transfer system, then mandate all transactions go thru their exchange. ( and if you go around it with a pirate wallet, those blocks are nullified, you would be breaking the law, and they know who you are due to wallet:person records. ) They create/distribute blocks when they want, and if its not sourced from them, its also null. So no "secret" mining. And since they control allocation, production and transfers, we are back in the same boat we are now, only worse.</p>
<p>Only way i could see it falling apart is if they dont pre-populate the entire chain, and someone developed a 3rd part wallet, then mined the piss out of things to collapse the total possible supply. I would assume once a block is tainted, it would be forever.</p>
<p>And ya, there are cryptos like Monero that would break the monitoring/control aspect, but they wont choose that way of doing it so its academic.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Mar 18 2023 01:45:10 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: Welcome back to 2008?</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">I thought the whole point of crypto was that it has no fiat holders and cannot be artificially inflated.</span></p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099330492</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2023 17:45:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099330492@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Some are <a href="https://defconnews.com/2023/03/18/the-endgame-of-the-banking-crisis-is-hyperinflation-and-currency-collapse/">saying</a> that "THE ENDGAME OF THE BANKING CRISIS IS HYPERINFLATION AND CURRENCY COLLAPSE" implying that the current situation is deliberate, and everything is engineered to collapse the existing currency and replace it with a digital, centrally-controlled cryptocurrency.</p>
<p>I have to admit I don't quite understand this.  Fiat currency is fiat currency, regardless of whether it is cash or crypto, if the same organization (the Federal Reserve) controls the fiat and can create more of it?  I thought the whole point of crypto was that it has no fiat holders and cannot be artificially inflated.</p>
<p>Sensible answers only, please.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099330160</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099330160@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >So far, it seems as if everyone is so desensitized to disaster at      
 >this point that they're not paying much attention, and not making a    
 
 >run on the banks.  In such a high inflation environment, where are    
 
 >you going to put your money anyway?      
 >      
      
 I got bold earlier this week and bought a bunch of stock from a firm that
is in an unrelated sector and was tanking due to panic effect. WHen the panic
was over the stock price was back to normal. So much win.     
    
 I know of people who bought stock in banks that were tanking hard. As far
as I know they bounced back up after touching minimum.   
  
 Lots of people just placed their money in values traditionally considered
safe havens around here. Those values skyrocketed artificially. I cannot imagine
what it is going to be when they return back to normal themselves. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099330142</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 20:46:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099330142@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The real solution and hedge against inflation and total collapse, is to get elected into the legislature.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>:) </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099330139</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 20:10:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099330139@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Haven't heard of them.   Is this something "normal people" can get?   
  
 I don't own any, personally (it's too much of a risk-averse asset for my
taste), but that looks like a yes; a decent broker should be able to get them
for you (the category shows up on my Fidelity screen.) 
  
 Looks somewhat illiquid; you need to know when the auction dates are and
plan ahead? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099330032</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 03:14:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099330032@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Perhaps, TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) bonds?     
  
 Haven't heard of them.   Is this something "normal people" can get? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099329882</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 22:48:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099329882</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099329882@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Now its 2 banks.</p>
<p>( i thought i posted that earlier today..  donno what the hell i did, or where )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099329870</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 20:34:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099329870@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >run on the banks.  In such a high inflation environment, where are  
 >you going to put your money anyway?  
  
 Vinyl records, pizza, and porn.  And sending the wife to a castle in France
for a week in August. 
 Until we get sensible monetary policy in the Congress, the Fed, and the White
House, I see no point in doing anything else.  Tax-n-spend is going to eat
it up anyway. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099329863</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 19:59:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099329863@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>There, i fixed it for you.</p>
<p>The 1% that are collapsing things, dont. Or at least only enough for daily operational needs. But not all of it.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Mar 13 2023 03:54:28 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: Welcome back to 2008?</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />Sorry for being serious on this forum. The proper answer is: "Bank runs are significant because that's where <span style="color: #ff0000;">serfs</span> keep their money." </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099329862</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 19:57:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099329862@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Part of the plan i think.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Mar 13 2023 09:55:33 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Welcome back to 2008?</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">So far, it seems as if everyone is so desensitized to disaster </span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099329861</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 19:54:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099329861@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >run on the banks.  In such a high inflation environment, where are    
 >you going to put your money anyway?    
    
 Perhaps, TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) bonds?   
  
  
 Sorry for being serious on this forum. The proper answer is: "Bank runs are
significant because that's where people keep their money." 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099329813</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2023 13:55:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Welcome back to 2008?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099329813@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well, here we are.  Silicon Valley Bank collapsed at the end of last week and now another one (Signature Bank) collapsed over the weekend.</p>
<p>(Fun note: Barney Frank was on the board of Signature Bank.  Hmm.)</p>
<p>So far, it seems as if everyone is so desensitized to disaster at this point that they're not paying much attention, and not making a run on the banks.  In such a high inflation environment, where are you going to put your money anyway?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099319144</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 21:22:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099319144</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099319144@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 *intuitively 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099319143</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2022 21:22:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099319143</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099319143@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 It's not crazy, though. Fractional reserve banking probably depends on an
expectation of continued growth in some way. I'm not one of those "fractional
reserve banking must be banned immediately" people; that's a notion I reject
on grounds that are essentially libertarian. 
  
 But it seems untuitively correct that if growth were to stop, everyone's
financing expectations would be disrupted, and waves of bankruptcy could ensue.

  
 So that's why it's important to separate real growth from nominal growth.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099318761</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2022 01:50:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099318761</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099318761@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Maybe they were thinking of social security. It's an understandable   
 >mistake, most people seem to think "the economy" is something that   
 >comes from the government.   
  
 That might be part of it; as was suggested, perhaps the perception of growth
requirement comes from those who lean Keynesian. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099317851</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 20:37:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317851</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317851@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > I heard someone say a few days ago that a typical economy requires   
 >ever-increasing population for the economy to remain healthy.   
 >    
 > Is that true?  Supposedly this is widely agreed upon, but it doesn't  

 >sound right to me.  It would seem that there has to be some sort of   
 >equilibrium available.   
  
 Frequently claimed but never proven. Basically we all have certain expectations
built into our planning. When those expectations are disrupted, chaos ensues,
but the world eventually goes on. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099317512</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 19:18:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317512</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317512@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2022-11-20 18:04 from IGnatius T Foobar       
 >        
 > Ok, here's a nice juicy economics bit to chew on.       
 >        
 > I heard someone say a few days ago that a typical economy requires    
  
 >ever-increasing population for the economy to remain healthy.       
 >        
 > Is that true?  Supposedly this is widely agreed upon, but it doesn't  
    
 >sound right to me.  It would seem that there has to be some sort of    
  
 >equilibrium available.       
 >       
 >      
      
 A lot of people seems to think you require an ever-growing economy to keep
economy healthy. I have found most of that people to be Keynessians, who criticise
Capitalism because it has a tendency to grow and need growth. Then they push
policies that are designed to keep the economy growing artificially.     
    
 "The real state market is Capitalist and that is the reason why it is causing
$country
to crash. Since the real state market cannot grow anymore we will be facing
a crisis. What we must now do is reject free market Capitalism and give loans
away so people can keep buying homes and therefore avoid the crisis."   
  
 Hayek had some words for this in one of his books. You can have a deflating
economy and be ok as long as you don't crash from a stupid position. ie. if
your village has less productive output you will survive unless you have spend
all your grain reserves in stupid stuff and have absolutely no food reserves.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099317466</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:18:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317466</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317466@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Within reason, I dont think its size of population that helps or hurts on its own. Of course too many people exhausts/duplicates resources, too little, and you cant keep up with demand.</p>
<p>I think its down to natural resources available to kick start things, and the government staying the hell out of things.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 22 2022 12:19:25 AM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I think a growing population generally benefits a healthy economy. <br /><br />It depends on the growth - though. There are lots of countries with exploding populations and terrible economies. </p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099317434</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2022 05:19:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317434</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317434@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I think a growing population generally benefits a healthy economy. <br /><br />It depends on the growth - though. There are lots of countries with exploding populations and terrible economies. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099317278</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 23:10:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317278</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317278@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2022-11-20 23:04 from IGnatius T Foobar <ajc@citadel.org>   
 >    
 > Ok, here's a nice juicy economics bit to chew on.   
 >    
 > I heard someone say a few days ago that a typical economy requires   
 >ever-increasing population for the economy to remain healthy.   
 >    
 > Is that true?  Supposedly this is widely agreed upon, but it doesn't  

 >sound right to me.  It would seem that there has to be some sort of   
 >equilibrium available.   
 >   
  
 Maybe they were thinking of social security. It's an understandable mistake,
most people seem to think "the economy" is something that comes from the government.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099317277</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 23:04:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317277</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317277@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Ok, here's a nice juicy economics bit to chew on. 
  
 I heard someone say a few days ago that a typical economy requires ever-increasing
population for the economy to remain healthy. 
  
 Is that true?  Supposedly this is widely agreed upon, but it doesn't sound
right to me.  It would seem that there has to be some sort of equilibrium
available. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099305922</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2022 21:26:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099305922</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099305922@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>lol</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Jul 14 2022 09:07:08 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">I filled up for under $40 the other day. But enough about my lawnmower... </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099305833</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2022 13:07:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099305833</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099305833@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I filled up for under $40 the other day.  But enough about my lawnmower...

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099304844</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2022 12:43:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099304844</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099304844@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2022-06-26 10:16 from Nurb432   
 >Bought gas for 4.80 a gallon yesterday. Sad that it was considered a  
 >'deal'..   
 >  
  
 I paid more than 6 not so long ago, for 93 octane. 
  
 100 octane at the track was going for more than 14, and 110 leaded was in
the high 13's, almost $14... 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099304679</link><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2022 14:16:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099304679</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099304679@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Bought gas for 4.80 a gallon yesterday. Sad that it was considered a 'deal'.. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099291122</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2022 18:26:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099291122</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099291122@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I like that.  The Quarter Pounder Index.  Or as it's known elsewhere, Les
Inflation Royale. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099290930</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 22:20:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099290930</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099290930@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I remember going to MCD, get a bigmac *meal*, give them a buck and get change.. </p>
<p>Then go fill my car up with 5 bucks .. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099290757</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 02:05:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099290757</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099290757@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Up until now I was taking the recent inflation levels in stride, but  

 >it really hit me yesterday when I paid $54 for three pieces of trim to 
 
 >convert a pair of closet doors from tracked to hinged.  Things are   
 >getting pretty ridiculous.  
  
 The only price index that matters to me is the Large Quarter-Pounder with
Cheese Meal Price Index. 
  
 That shit used to be $5 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099288285</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:17:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099288285</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099288285@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>We did too, but I can only do so much ( space and $ )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099288264</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2022 11:48:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099288264</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099288264@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2022-01-09 12:52 from Nurb432   
 >late in 2020 i got some wood to add a top and shelving to a steel  
 >frame fish tank.  The prices of wood was shocking.      
 >  
 >    
 >  
 >Inflation hits me several times a week. anytime i feed the jeep, or  
 >myself.  
 >  
  
 I saw this coming, so I overstocked my stores and reserves well in advance.
Prices here are going through the roof but I have supplies of everything that
both matters and is getting expensive purchased at the old prices. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099288202</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2022 17:52:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099288202</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099288202@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>late in 2020 i got some wood to add a top and shelving to a steel frame fish tank.  The prices of wood was shocking.   </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Inflation hits me several times a week. anytime i feed the jeep, or myself.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=2099288198</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2022 17:39:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099288198</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099288198@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Up until now I was taking the recent inflation levels in stride, but it really
hit me yesterday when I paid $54 for three pieces of trim to convert a pair
of closet doors from tracked to hinged.  Things are getting pretty ridiculous.
  
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4651055</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2021 16:58:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4651055</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4651055@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Damn, if that doesn't sum it up. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648865</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:58:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648865</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648865@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 It all feels like too much drama to me. Where the discussion starts and ends
is that it may be illegal to make forward-looking statements on social media
if you have a vested interest in the outcome. Everything else is noise. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648596</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 20:14:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648596</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648596@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Wait, who are the private investors. Everybody is private. Are you   
  
 Yes they are all private.  I should have said hedge funds vs. small investors
who trade at the retail brokerages.  The way I am reading this, big hedge
funds and reddit gangs both appear to have collaborated to manipulate the
price of GME, but when the reddit gang won this round, the funds cried foul.
 You know, the whole double standards thing. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648594</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 19:45:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648594</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648594@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>A lot of things are like that.  But with luck more stuff like this helps the 'commoners' see the truth. </p>
<p>And while i really hate to agree with AOC, she is right in this case. Something needs to be done to these people cutting off trading. ( of course we have a different opinion on why..  shes just pissed as she didnt get in on it :) )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Jan 29 2021 14:27:44 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"> It is just a money machine for the people who can afford to short invest. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648572</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 15:21:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648572</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648572@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2021-01-29 22:21 from nonservator   
 >LOL Elizabeth Warren goes to bat for hedge funds? Have we hit peak  
 >clown world?  
 >  
  
 Definitely clown world. I feel like there's a new peak every day though.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648514</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 03:21:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648514</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648514@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>LOL Elizabeth Warren goes to bat for hedge funds? Have we hit peak clown world?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648502</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 00:04:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648502</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648502@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >hedge funds seem to be "allowed" to manipulate stocks but private   
 >investors aren't.   
  
 Wait, who are the private investors. Everybody is private. Are you talking
about big corps versus individuals on reddit? Because nobody's going after
the individuals, they are going after the big corps that may have seeded discussions
on reddit while they had a vested interest. Unless I'm really misreading this;
I've really only skimmed the news articles so far--at best. I'm more like
just gathering headlines and blurbs. Because this is frankly inane, except
for AOC accusing Ted Cruz of attempted murder. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648499</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2021 00:00:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648499</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648499@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2021-01-29 17:10 from zooer   
 >Well today I look all my money out of my Enron stocks and dumped it  
 >into GameStop. The leftover money I purchased Lotto tickets with.  
 >(Crosses fingers)...     
 >  
  
 so in other words, you did nothing because there was no enron money :) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648493</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 22:58:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648493</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648493@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[This one is interesting because it exposes how the entire market is just imaginary
funny money.  And there's a lot of discussion about how hedge funds seem to
be "allowed" to manipulate stocks but private investors aren't. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648488</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 22:10:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648488</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648488@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well today I look all my money out of my Enron stocks and dumped it into GameStop. The leftover money I purchased Lotto tickets with. (Crosses fingers)...   </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648469</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 20:21:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648469</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648469@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Yeah. Waves of long-side enthusiasm can break in a ponzi-esque manner because
they depend on unsustaible recruitment. That can leave some very disappointed
trend-followers holding the bag. I would not buy in at this point in the game;
it's too late to get in. 
  
 There may be a legitimate SEC investigation around public statements that
were made on reddit. Insiders, or others with a vested interest, should not
be making such statements. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648440</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 19:27:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648440</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648440@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[We need more heroes fucking institutional short investors in the ass.   
  
 I understand regular investments, but short investments make no economical
sense to me. It is just a money machine for the people who can afford to short
invest. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648405</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 15:38:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648405</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648405@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I was at Shell filling up - and the video was showing GameStop, and I could barely hear the audio, but the dialog was all about Wall Street finance. <br /><br />And I was sitting there with the pump in my hand going, "WTF?!?" <br /><br />This adds a little clarity to that, too. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Jan 28 2021 11:48:42 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=nonservator">nonservator</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><a href="https://theothermccain.com/2021/01/28/gamestop-reddit-deep-value/" target="webcit01">https://theothermccain.com/2021/01/28/gamestop-reddit-deep-value/</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=47097" target="webcit01">https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=47097</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/01/revenge-of-the-nerds-reddit-wallstreetbets-short-squeezes-hedge-fund-on-gamestop-stock/" target="webcit01">https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/01/revenge-of-the-nerds-reddit-wallstreetbets-short-squeezes-hedge-fund-on-gamestop-stock/</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="https://www.youtube.com/embed/HblY-PBsY_c" target="webcit01">https://www.youtube.com/embed/HblY-PBsY_c</a></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648303</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2021 00:26:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648303</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648303@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Apparently Reddit is popular for people going nuts with crazy stock market purchases.  Leon Cooperman is predicting Reddit users will be in tears.<br />https://www.cnbc.com/2021/01/28/leon-cooperman-on-gamestop-reddit-speculators-im-not-damning-them-but-it-will-end-in-tears.html</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This sort of thing has happened before.</p>
<p>In one case a company was never mentioned but a youtuber named "Gabor The Blind Guy" mentioned that is father worked for a bottling company that was going to make child-proof caps for CBD infused coca-cola products.</p>
<p>https://www.marijuanamoment.net/coca-cola-denies-cbd-beverage-rumor-spurred-by-video/</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Don't get your advice from Reddit.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648285</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 23:23:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648285</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648285@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 LOL no, unless an index fund is holding it. No time for shenanigans. Strange
that weird-ass fly-by-night brokerages are trying to save their customers
from themselves. Calling a trade halt is the exchange's job. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648283</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 23:02:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648283</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648283@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[So ... is anyone long on GameStop stock right now? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648246</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:48:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648246</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648246@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>https://theothermccain.com/2021/01/28/gamestop-reddit-deep-value/</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.battleswarmblog.com/?p=47097</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/01/revenge-of-the-nerds-reddit-wallstreetbets-short-squeezes-hedge-fund-on-gamestop-stock/</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.youtube.com/embed/HblY-PBsY_c</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648243</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 16:38:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648243</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648243@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Elaborate? </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Jan 28 2021 08:47:30 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=nonservator">nonservator</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Normal people try to bankrupt a hedge fund using their own tactics against them. Result: People who claim to hate the rich and care about the working class scream that this is all the fault of Gamergate, Trump, and white supremacy.</p>
<p>Fuck this clown world.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4648216</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2021 13:47:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4648216</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4648216@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Normal people try to bankrupt a hedge fund using their own tactics against them. Result: People who claim to hate the rich and care about the working class scream that this is all the fault of Gamergate, Trump, and white supremacy.</p>
<p>Fuck this clown world.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4558320</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 13:37:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4558320</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4558320@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes, he was running too fast through the airport, creating a safety hazard.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4558067</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 17:56:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4558067</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4558067@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Did O.J. kill them off?  If the driver gloves don't fit you must acquit. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4558052</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2020 17:20:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4558052</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4558052@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, that really hertz. 
 <rimshot> 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4556359</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2020 21:38:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4556359</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4556359@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Hertz Files For Bankruptcy<br />https://www.forbes.com/sites/chriswestfall/2020/05/23/hertz-files-bankruptcy-stunning-us-automakers-as-leaders-scramble-for-solutions/#5cc440805634</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4555573</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2020 13:31:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4555573</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4555573@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I avoid Amazon too.  My first stop for online shopping used to be eBay, but
eventually it became almost unusable because everything was either cheap chinese
counterfeits, or sellers doing all of their fulfillment through Amazon anyway.

  
 Nowadays I do a lot of my online shopping at Walmart.  This is ironic because
I hate going into their stores.  But they are the underdog here (about 6%
of the online retail market vs. almost 50% for Amazonopoly, if memory serves)
and y'all know how much I want to avoid doing business with "too big" companies.

  
 Back in 2018 there was an announcement that the United States intended to
withdraw from the Universal Postal Union.  Did that ever happen? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4554760</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2020 13:31:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4554760</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4554760@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It's been two years since I put Amazon on my list of companies I wouldn't have anything to do with if you put a gun to my head. Don't miss them a bit. Found alternate sources to get all but one product, and I'm living without that one.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4554559</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 23:45:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4554559</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4554559@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I ordered two things from Amazon.  The manufacture of one item was "out of stock" and linked to the Amazon page.   The other item I would have had to order on-line from somewhere so I did it at Amazon because....</p>
<p>The first item was $24.95.... free shipping starts at $25.</p>
<p>I could get FREE FREE TWO DAY SHIPPING with a Prime membership.... but I took the standard free shipping, my order won't arrive until June.</p>
<p>I can't find the first item anywhere except Amazon. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4554552</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 23:18:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4554552</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4554552@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I have it on good authority that the JCP / Amazon thing is real, but it's
more likely about helping them relieve some debt, taking on their online presence,
and some of the locations they want to unload to use for Amazon distribution.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4554519</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 20:40:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4554519</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4554519@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yes Amazon and JCPenny are in talks.... maybe.</p>
<p>Pier One is closing ALL their stores.<br /><a href="https://www.wsj.com/articles/pier-1-seeks-to-wind-down-operations-11589886805">https://www.wsj.com/articles/pier-1-seeks-to-wind-down-operations-11589886805</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4554453</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 17:56:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4554453</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4554453@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a couple of thoughts on this. 
  
 1. Amazon needs to be broken up into at least 5 or 6 smaller companies with
unrelated owners and boards. 
 2. This year might be one of those rare situations where Chapter 11 bankruptcy
actually means something, and isn't just a trial separation on the way to
Chapter 7.  Since the economy is merely switched off rather than broken right
now, bankrupt companies who had strong positive revenue before we shut it
down, are likely to have it again.  Bankruptcy protection could actually do
something useful here. 
 3. Yes, the supply chain needs to be moved onshore, bigly.  100% tariffs
on everything from China.  If asked why, point out the massive and punitive
tariffs that China is now leveraging upon Australia as an example to the world
of what they're willing to do when someone dares investigate their dishonesty
and corruption. 
  
 Market power becoming
more and more concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer companies is what
socialists mockingly refer to as "late stage capitalism."  This will sound
odd coming from me, but there *is* some merit to this argument.  I'd prefer
to see it fixed with a non-Keynesian solution, though. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4554376</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2020 14:50:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4554376</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4554376@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[They've been in the toilet for years.  I'm surprised that they survive in
any meaningful way to be honest. 
  
 I'm hopeful that we as a country return to more localized production and
distribution.  The supply chain is entirely too vulnerable to both international
and national events.   
  
 The internet showed the power of being able to do business anywhere.  The
pandemic showed that the system doesn't have enough resiliance.   
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4554164</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2020 20:34:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4554164</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4554164@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>J.C. Penny filed for bankruptcy and will be closing 250 of its <span style="font-family: 'Libre Franklin', Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">846 stores.</span> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4550104</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 12:38:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4550104</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4550104@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I knew we were in fucking clown world when the governor decided marijuana stores were essential enough to remain open.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4549873</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2020 00:26:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4549873</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4549873@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>One would think illicit drugs would be essential.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4549831</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2020 22:33:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4549831</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4549831@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Restricting the delivery of food vs. drugs is the same thing, of course. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4548895</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 16:29:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4548895</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4548895@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue May 05 2020 07:21:51 AM EDT</span> <span>from darknetuser </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Relatedly, I have heard reports of package and food delivery people who is taking advantage to deliver drugs, since regular dealers can do the streets safely any longer in lockdown areas. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Capitalism at its finest. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4548818</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 11:21:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4548818</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4548818@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2020-05-04 17:41 from athos-mn     
 >I've seen a few places that say they won't take paper money, but they  
  
 >end up handling people's credit cards, so I don't really get how it's  
  
 >any saver with regards to Covid-19.     
 >     
 >    
    
 Yes, that seems retarded to me.   
  
 Relatedly, I have heard reports of package and food delivery people who is
taking advantage to deliver drugs, since regular dealers can do the streets
safely any longer in lockdown areas. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4548653</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 21:41:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4548653</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4548653@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I've seen a few places that say they won't take paper money, but they end
up handling people's credit cards, so I don't really get how it's any saver
with regards to Covid-19. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4544258</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2020 00:41:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4544258</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4544258@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[He lives in a different country than you do.  When he says "our currency"
he's not referring to the US Dollar. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4544194</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:56:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4544194</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4544194@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > I just took a lot of money from the bank and then bought a lot of   
 >foreigner currency. Just in case there is a bank account lockdown.   
 >There are currencies that are total shit (such as ours) but if things  

 >go to worse there are currencies anybody will accept.   
  
 Total shit? That's absurd, dude. We're still the flight-to-safety currency
preferred by most of the world. Only thing that comes close is the Euro, they're
pretty hard-nosed. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4544191</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 19:45:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4544191</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4544191@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I can understand the self checkouts accepting paper money, I had read that some stores were not accepting paper money transactions with human cashiers.  I don't know if this is true or not.  </p>
<p>A friend said that he used paper money and the cashier gave him a very dirty look when he did.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4544090</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 12:23:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4544090</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4544090@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2020-04-20 23:39 from IGnatius T Foobar   
 >To what end?  What is cash accomplishing now that is unique to the   
 >current situation?  I would have thought people would want to stay away
 
 >from physical money because it's potentially dirty.   
 >   
 >  
  
 I just took a lot of money from the bank and then bought a lot of foreigner
currency. Just in case there is a bank account lockdown. There are currencies
that are total shit (such as ours) but if things go to worse there are currencies
anybody will accept. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4543948</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 03:39:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4543948</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4543948@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[To what end?  What is cash accomplishing now that is unique to the current
situation?  I would have thought people would want to stay away from physical
money because it's potentially dirty. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4543927</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 01:32:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4543927</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4543927@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I always worry when you and I see things along the same lines. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4543914</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2020 00:52:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4543914</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4543914@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm using a lot more cash too.....  Interesting. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4543785</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 15:59:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4543785</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4543785@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Funny. I'm using lots of cash. Might be wearing a mask at the grocery store,
but putting it into the machine when i check out. Making certain that I get
money to people who need it on a day to day basis as well. If someone does
work for me (outside of my business) I make certain that they get cash. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4543772</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2020 14:55:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4543772</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4543772@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>People are not using cash at this time, how much closer will we be to a cashless society?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4542310</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2020 22:46:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4542310</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4542310@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The situation at troubled retailer JCPenney got more serious as the company missed a $12 million debt payment due Wednesday.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/business/jcpenney-missed-payment/index.html">https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/15/business/jcpenney-missed-payment/index.html</a></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4541629</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2020 18:04:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4541629</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4541629@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Depending on which BB&B you visit, it can feel like "Linens'n'Shit" already.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4540453</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 18:48:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4540453</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4540453@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Bed, Bath & Beyond is morphing into something more Target-like.     
  
 They will soon be known as "Linens'n'Shit" 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4540440</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2020 17:32:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4540440</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4540440@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Macy's will probably survive because their debt load is fairly low.   
  
  
 Penny's has been on deaths doorstep for a while. 
  
 Khols will probably survive because there's not much competition in the space
any more. 
  
 Bed, Bath & Beyond is morphing into something more Target-like.   
  
 I'm far more concerned about the millions of small businesses that aren't
going to make it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4540130</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2020 18:42:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4540130</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4540130@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Any predictions for which big box brick and mortar stores are going to make it or fail by the time this is over?</p>
<p>Sears is gone.<br />What about Macy's, J.C.Penny's, Khols, or Bed, Bath &amp; Beyond?</p>
<p>Add your own....</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4507509</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 04:50:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4507509</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4507509@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I was surprised to find that that article eventually made a passing mention
of Elizabeth Warren. 
  
 It's hard to figure out exactly where she stands on protectionism and tarriffs.
 She says a lot of things.   I am pro-protectionism but it's not a long term
sustainable strategy; it has to be combined with eventual results.  Otherwise,
what happens is that Winnie Xi Pooh will just re-shuffle the deck over and
over again until they can cheat again. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4493540</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2019 18:46:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4493540</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4493540@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 https://www.washingtonpost.com/outlook/2019/07/30/elizabeth-warrens-trade-plan-is-bad-politics-worse-policy/

  
 "Elizabeth Warren.s trade plan is bad politics and worse policy 
 Seriously, it.s really, really bad." 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4485844</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 20:57:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4485844</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4485844@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Working on it. Will let you know.. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4485759</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 17:28:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4485759</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4485759@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Ooooh ... both LS *and* good wine at Chez Perv?  I need to be there. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4485214</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:44:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4485214</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4485214@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Oh.. I still have wine. Just not the wall of it. And yes. Bring some along.
 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4485207</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 21:28:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4485207</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4485207@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 We'll have to bring over a bottle of our own to sample. (* I'm dangerous
if you let me finish it by myself.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4485198</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:36:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4485198</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4485198@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[heh. I don't have the wall of wine anymore. There is some very good single
malt though. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4485180</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2019 19:12:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4485180</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4485180@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > But if we're drunk on burgundy wine then maybe we don't care so much  

 >how our investments are doing.   
  
 I think you're not supposed to drink your investment. I mean, so I've been
told. Might be why aahz ain't paid 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4484744</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Sep 2019 03:17:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4484744</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4484744@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2019/08/24/burgundy-wine-inves
 
 >tors-have-beaten-the-stockmarket   
  
 "Beating the market" sets the bar pretty low, actually.  Good investments
have to earn well, of course, but it's equally important to have low volatility.
 Otherwise we'd all just invest in index funds and let our portfolios run
on autopilot. 
  
 But if we're drunk on burgundy wine then maybe we don't care so much how
our investments are doing. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4479287</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 15:35:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4479287</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4479287@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I think the Economist forgot to mention the usual Joseph and Pharaoh analogy.
Too bad. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4479246</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 13:15:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4479246</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4479246@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Wine is good, but usually way overpriced. Real men have cheap bourbon. In
a hip flask. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4479120</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 02:30:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4479120</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4479120@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Burgundy is okay. I prefer blends. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4479094</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2019 00:14:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4479094</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4479094@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 For aahz, 
  
 https://www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2019/08/24/burgundy-wine-investors-have-beaten-the-stockmarket

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4478388</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2019 05:10:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4478388</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4478388@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Aug 15 2019 13:55:52 EDT</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Laffer means whatever you want it to mean. That seems to be the only consensus. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/0/01/Larry_Laffer_VGA.jpg" alt="Larry Laffer VGA.jpg" /></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4476099</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2019 17:55:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4476099</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4476099@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Laffer means whatever you want it to mean.  That seems to be the only consensus.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4473973</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 01:21:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4473973</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4473973@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Hmmm... maybe I am wrong, but the actuall Laffer hipothesis is that when you are rising taxes, there is a point after which you make less tax money despite the fact you are charging bigger and bigger ammounts of protection rates to your subjects. Usually the Laffer effect is used to declare that you should not rise the taxes after the sweet spot because then you are not maximizing gov revenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It doesn't imply that the people is better or worse with more or less taxes. I have a strong opinion on that, but it is not born from Laffer effect theories. Actually, I think that the government managing big ammounts of money is not necessarily good because then it has more chances of using tax dollar against the population, so the idea of maximizing government income does not appeal to me.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>An interesting consideration is that the fact business get officially shutdown because they cannot afford taxes does not necessarily mean they are getting shutdown in practice. And by this I mean, if the government sets an income tax of 90% I will just move more of my business to the dark market, the government will make less money, and I will perform about the same economic activities. I think over-regulation is oftentimes very effective at self destructing. I have been moving more and more of my moneymaking out of my country and out of the hands of tax collectors with the years due to over regulation and I think I am actually making more money because of the laws trying me to make less.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I used to carry a small knife on me because big knives were illegal to carry. Then they made small knives illegal too, so now I carry something way less PC correct than a small pocket knife. If the penaulty for carrying a bazooka is the same as the one for carrying a kubotan then you are gonna carry the bazooka. As Churchill said: When you make 10 000 regulations, you destroy every respect for the law.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4461537</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 17:26:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4461537</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4461537@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Crappy excuse for a president exited office in January 2017 and was never
a fan of Laffer. 
  
 You're probably thinking of President Trump, and if so, you're correct. 
He seems to have misremembered when he learned Laffer theory.  Nevertheless,
he has put Laffer economics into practice, and the thriving economy suggests
that it is working.  The market is way up, employment is way up, and the growth
of the national debt has slowed way down. 
  
 It's hard to find good reads on Laffer economics.  Wikipedophilia describes
it wrong, and the fake news describe it as "debunked".  Tom McClellan pointed
out that whenever total federal tax receipts exceed 18 percent of GDP, it
inevitably leads to a recession.  Laffer theorized that tax rates when set
too high, harm the economy, which seems pretty obvious to me.  I seem to recall
that he cited that same 18 percent as a sort of stable point to which
a healthy economy gravitates -- it sort of "snaps" to that percentage within
a wide range of tax rates.  In other words, low tax rates and a thriving economy,
vs. high tax rates and an anemic economy, either way it ends up around 18
percent. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4461317</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2019 18:18:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4461317</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4461317@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Speaking of Laffer, our crappy excuse for a president claimed that he studied
the Laffer Curve in college, which was like Wharton class of '68? Laffer famously
drew the eponymous Curve on a napkin in like '73 or '74. You figure out the
implications for yourself. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4456229</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jun 2019 19:09:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4456229</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4456229@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Speaking of economics... 
  
 Arthur Laffer has received the Presidential Medal of Freedom. 
  
 This, of course, has upset critics of both Laffer himself and also the President.
 No big surprise there, but it's probably a force-multiplier in both directions.

  
 Laffer is known for pointing out that revenue relative to GDP remains fairly
constant, regardless of where the tax rates are actually set, therefore tax
rates should be set to maximize GDP and therefore tax revenue.  His theory
places that maximum revenue point towards the lower end of the tax rate scale.

  
 Don't bother reading the Wikipedia article on the Laffer Curve.  It reads
as if it were written by Paul Krugman, and basically concludes that we should
all be taxed at 70%. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4386756</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 19:21:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4386756</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4386756@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Big Clive lives in Scotland.  He won't be affected by the United States pulling
out of the UPU unless the rest of the western world does it too. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4386710</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:44:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4386710</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4386710@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Clive will care, all his stuff comes from China.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4386698</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2018 15:04:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4386698</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4386698@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Here's an interesting development.  Some of you may have heard this news
already. 
  
 [ https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/411828-us-announces-intent-to-withdraw-from-international-postal-rate-system
] 
  
 I learned about the "Universal Postal Union" while reading retrospective
pieces about the demise of Radio Shack.  One of the reasons they went down
is because it's cheaper to ship those yummy little piecesparts from China
than it is to ship domestically within the US.  This is because the UPU still
considers China a third-world nation, and the US subsidizes the shipping costs
of incoming parcels. 
  
 This, of course, is why Amazon and others are able to abuse the system. 
I wondered how long it would take for the "America First" administration to
take notice, and make efforts to fix the problem.  We can leave the politics
out of it by avoiding discussion of whether the approach
being taken is correct.  But it does seem to be pretty obvious that China
no longer has any need for this kind of economic advantage at our expense,
so I'm happy to hear that it's being addressed. 
  
 Yes, that $0.99 widget will now cost $1.49.  Who cares. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4341493</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 13:48:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4341493</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4341493@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[All right, so we blame Amazon *and* Mitt Romney.  Fine with me.  :) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4341301</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:31:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4341301</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4341301@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Some of the business sites are pointing to the $6.5B in debt that Toys R Us was trying to service.  That $6.5B was the debt load that was used to buy TRU and take it private.   So Bain Capitol, et al, didn't use any real money to buy the company.  The company then went an additional $1.5B in debt after that.   </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4340904</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 17:43:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4340904</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4340904@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The problems of We Be Toys were larger than Amazon.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4340879</link><pubDate>Sat, 17 Mar 2018 14:51:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4340879</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4340879@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have to assume the giraffe is a reference to Toys Я Us, the latest victim of retail mass murderer Amazonopoly.  Once again we need to switch to european style antitrust law, designed to protect competition rather than the consumer.</p>
<p>It's sad that today's children will have been the last generation to have experienced the joy of browsing a real toy store.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4340318</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2018 02:16:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4340318</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4340318@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p><img src="
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4324595</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2017 18:18:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4324595</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4324595@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Seen on a random message board out on teh intarwebz...</p>
<blockquote>
<p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 15px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; color: #2a2e2e;">The CBO projections are never accurate, because they don't take into account how policy affects behavior. Tax rate cuts have always increased revenues, but the Democrat Congresses increase spending by even more, which results in deficits.</p>
<p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 15px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; color: #2a2e2e;">Best example was the Harding/Coolidge Administrations which cut government spending by half and cut the top tax rate from 75% to 25%, triggered the Roaring Twenties and paid down the National Debt by a third.</p>
<p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px 0px 15px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; color: #2a2e2e;">It worked so well that it looked like Progressives would never gain power again, so the Progressive Federal Reserve came to the rescue with easy credit and low interest rates, increasing the money supply by 62% between 1925 and 1929, creating bubbles in stocks and real estate, then pulled the rug out from under it with tight credit policies and high interest rates, causing the Crash of '29, blaming it on capitalism when it should have been blamed on the Fed.</p>
<p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; color: #2a2e2e;">And they're set up to do it again.</p>
</blockquote>
<p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; color: #2a2e2e;">Hauser's Law still seems to be reliable, so it makes sense to set tax rates as low as possible in order to grow the economy.</p>
<p style="box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; border: 0px; font-size: 15px; line-height: 21px; font-family: 'Helvetica Neue', arial, sans-serif; color: #2a2e2e;"> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4302885</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:17:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4302885</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4302885@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[It was an ordinary Android smartphone. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4302876</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2017 16:05:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4302876</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4302876@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Thhe VIC-20 MP3 player was about the size of an iPod.  There was something
else they released under the PET name, come to think of it, but I've long
since forgotten what it was. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4302418</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2017 12:55:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4302418</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4302418@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Circuit City name is not much good if you're trying to sell   
 >smartphones to millennials!   
  
 Neither is "Commodore PET" but they tried that. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4299824</link><pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:41:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4299824</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4299824@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Ha!  That'd be hilarious.  Bulky, clunky ol' VIC-20 MP3 player, hefted over
your shoulder or something for your 'convenience'... 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4295078</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 15:55:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4295078</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4295078@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Reminds me of the VIC-20 MP3 player by "Commodore".  Mmmm hmmm.... 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4294996</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 13:58:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4294996</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4294996@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Circuit City name is not much good if you're trying to sell smartphones to
millennials! 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4294419</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2017 03:32:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4294419</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4294419@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok maybe not "old revered brands" but at least "old brands whose names you've
heard of before"  :) 
  
 It's a good marketing trick.  People are attracted to things that (they believe)
are familiar. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4294103</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2017 16:15:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4294103</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4294103@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 His prices were insane. 
  
 CompUSA holds a special place in my heart for being about as slimy as retailers
can get.  Fortunately, they went out of business, too. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4293617</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 20:28:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4293617</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4293617@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I was all about Crazy Eddie 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4293587</link><pubDate>Wed, 20 Sep 2017 18:24:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4293587</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4293587@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 They weren't all that revered, though. Just another big-box retailer. Indistinguishable
from Best Buy and The Wiz (remember The Wiz?) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4293382</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 21:38:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4293382</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4293382@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[It won't be the same thing anyway.  We see this all the time.  People buy
access to old revered brands just to call attention to what they're doing.
 It probably happens in every industry. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4293347</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 18:26:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4293347</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4293347@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Nice one.... apparently somebody intends to bring the Circuit City name back
from the dead. I'm not holding my breath. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4293335</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2017 17:25:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4293335</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4293335@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Circuit City. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4292977</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:17:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4292977</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4292977@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Shit, where am I going to go next time I need to buy speaker wire? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4292918</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2017 14:02:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Who killed Radio Shack?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4292918@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I suppose the subject line is provocative.  Everyone except Radio Shack knows that Radio Shack killed Radio Shack.  But there are some interesting perspectives.</p>
<p>The "universal postal union" which sets international postal rates from country to country still considers China a "zone 3" nation.  This means that a shipper in China can send a package to someone in the US for LESS than it costs for a shipper *within the US* to send the same package domestically.</p>
<p>So there you go ... the second-largest economy on the planet gets the same international shipping rates as dirt-poor third world nations.  The Hudson Institute did a piece on this, explaining that while Radio Shack certainly didn't execute very well, the deck was also stacked against them.</p>
<p>Meanwhile ... what's left of the now-perpetually-going-out-of-business Radio Shack isn't helping itself.  <a href="https://www.radioshack.com/collections/project-enclosures-parts/products/radioshack-cushion-feet-with-adhesive-two-styles-20-pack">$6.15 for a pack of 20 stick-on rubber feet?</a>  Umm ... no.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4274891</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2017 23:45:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4274891</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4274891@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > If young people want a 'shared experience', I suppose dancing around, 
 
 >singing "I'm a Pepper" would do it, but...   
  
 If I had been born 15-20 years earlier I would have totally been an "Up With
People" cast member. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4272228</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 18:48:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4272228</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4272228@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Rule #1.  And possibly #4, just because.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4272081</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2017 11:10:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4272081</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4272081@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Young people want effective marketing? 
  
 Ugh. 
  
 Maybe that explains the whole pants-showing-buttocks thing.  If that's prison-code
for 'my ass is ready for you', and if it has helped men get their ass compromised
in a way they desire, then I guess that's effective marketing. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4271815</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 12:45:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4271815</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4271815@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I don't think they really care about shared experiences. They care about effective
marketing. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4271786</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 10:51:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4271786</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4271786@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2017-05-23 22:13 from wizard of aahz   
 >Except for the fact that 30 years later the commercial is still in your
 
 >head.  
  
 That just means it was effective advertising for its day. 
  
 If young people want a 'shared experience', I suppose dancing around, singing
"I'm a Pepper" would do it, but... 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4271693</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 02:18:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4271693</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4271693@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Mr. Pibb</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4271691</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2017 02:13:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4271691</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4271691@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Except for the fact that 30 years later the commercial is still in your head.
 
  
  
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4271573</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 17:44:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4271573</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4271573@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2017-05-22 13:58 from Ragnar Danneskjold   
 >How can clothing be a sharable experience without branding?   
  
 If ass-revealing pants become popular, everyone will share the experience
of having the rest of the population laugh the assless-pants wearers to scorn.

  
 Or, more seriously, if garments contain particularly useful innovations (maybe
carefully woven circuitry that work with your smartphone in some way), you
could share the experience of using such innovative clothing. 
  
 Actually, what kind of experience does shared branding confer to a people
wearing the brand?  It's like that absurd commercial for Dr. Pepper in the
80s, "Wouldn't you like to be a Pepper, too?" as they try to convince people
through advertising that you can be a unique and individual person by drinking
the same brand as everyone else. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4271497</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 12:59:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4271497</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4271497@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Fuckerberg's Razor. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4271350</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 May 2017 02:38:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4271350</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4271350@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Do not blame communism for that which can be squarely blamed on Facebook.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4271124</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 18:55:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4271124</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4271124@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I see all the major corporations merging as a step towards communism. All these name brands are made by one or two companies.  You are getting the same thing with a different label on it.  We have the illusion of choice.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4271107</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 17:58:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4271107</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4271107@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[How can clothing be a sharable experience without branding? 
  
 As for "experiences" - I think that's the new anti-capitalist take on things.
 Why buy an object?   
  
 Post-consumerism is just another step towards communism. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4271053</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2017 13:59:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4271053</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4271053@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 So... retail stores should create a memorably awful experience that everyone
can share on their favorite social media! 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4270585</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2017 17:12:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4270585</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4270585@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I heard some interesting observations about the "retail apocalypse" today.</p>
<p>* Half of American households now have at least one Amazonopoly Prime subscription.  There has never been any doubt where the retail dollars are going, but that number is staggering.</p>
<p>* In 2016, restaurant spending exceeded grocery spending for the first time.  This is consistent with the concept that the retail experience of the future is going to be one less focused on <em>buying</em> things and more focused on <em>doing</em> things.</p>
<p>And here's the really interesting one:</p>
<p>* If you're old enough, think about how important your clothing brands are today vs. how important they were just a generation ago.  Designer jeans, logo shirts, etc.  If you didn't have the latest brands it used to make you totally uncool.  Does anyone care about that anymore?  Most don't.  Today it's about having <em>shareable experiences.</em>  Why is that?  Social media, of course.  Having an experience that you can post to [site of your choice] is more important than buying a particular brand.</p>
<p>Think about it: in 2007 it's "Hey all you 100 people reading this, check out me riding this roller coaster!" while in 1987 it would be "Hey all you 3 people with me at the amusement part, check out the Izod shirt I'm wearing while we ride the roller coaster"</p>
<p>We should *totally* nuke Seattle, it isn't doing anything useful.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4266625</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 20:23:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4266625</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4266625@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Sears has been a victim of their own horrible decisions lately. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4264510</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2017 20:59:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4264510</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4264510@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Sears and Roebuck...now, Robucks are virtual currency within Roblox.  
  
 Oh, how the mighty have fallen. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4263837</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2017 02:16:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4263837</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4263837@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Sears started off as a mail order company, they were killed off by their original business model.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4263795</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 23:12:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4263795</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4263795@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Sears and Kmart have been badly damaged by Amazonopoly.  All retail is hurting
right now but Sears/Kmart are in particular trouble. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4263714</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:19:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4263714</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4263714@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I didn't know Sears had a franchise business, the other day I was behind a bus and saw "Own a Sears store!" and thought 'What a horrible idea!' Within the last three years both the Sears and Kmart stores closed here.</p>
<p>I had to look this up and TIL Sears sold franchises, but because of poor business decisions within the rest of the company, the franchises are failing as well.</p>
<p>http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-03-19/sears-hometown-franchisees-business-has-suffered-post-spinoff</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4216734</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2017 23:26:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4216734</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4216734@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<head explodes> 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4215015</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2017 01:14:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4215015</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4215015@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<economaphrodite> 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4213750</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Mar 2017 17:46:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4213750</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4213750@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2017-03-11 13:51 from IGnatius T Foobar   
 >Knowing where your older one went to college, I'm surprised she didn't 
 
 >come home verbally assaulting you for being white and male.   
 >   
 >  
  
 She came out relatively unscathed.   
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4212121</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:51:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4212121</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4212121@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Knowing where your older one went to college, I'm surprised she didn't come
home verbally assaulting you for being white and male. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4204148</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Mar 2017 20:59:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4204148</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4204148@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[A non-profit is BS anyway.  So they waste money on buildings, food service,
consultants, etc.  So what if they have to spend it all?  Meaningless.   
  
  
 Having put one through college and another in right now, I've seen how much
waste there is first hand. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4203889</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 18:52:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4203889</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4203889@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 It's fair for the government to think twice about providing govt money to
for-profit schools. Apparently the withdrawal of the gravy train is what killed
ITT, so maybe they just deserved to die. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4203858</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:35:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4203858</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4203858@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[From what I saw the ITT tuition amounts were pretty high too. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4203839</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 14:07:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4203839</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4203839@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>ITT had a few issues.  They were having an issue with low graduation rates compared to the enrollment numbers.  </p>
<p>Though I wonder if this is more a matter of the clientele that they were targeting.  Working Adults aren't always able to dedicate enough time to get through a degree.   They have other things going on that take time away or make it hard.   I went back to get my degree when I was in my early 30s.  If I had waited till two years ago instead, I would have had to drop out due to real life throwing too many things in my direction that had to be dealt with.    I wonder what the demographic looks like in a traditional university when you look at similar age groups, and pull out all the early 20 year olds who are just going to school and not working to put themselves through school, and pay the bills, etc.  </p>
<p>The Obama administration had a thing about For-Profit schools, and was constantly attacking the big ones.  Sometimes rightfully so, sometimes not so much.  This caused ITT to have to spend lots of money on lawyers and defending themselves.  There was also a movement by the Obama administration to take back money paid to the school when a student dropped out.   </p>
<p>At least that was what was reported in the local papers about ITT.    </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4203729</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2017 02:35:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4203729</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4203729@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't ITT have a bunch of problems? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4203610</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2017 19:27:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4203610</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4203610@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 ITT closed its doors due to the throngs of people not attending their classes?

  
 No... I think it was government policy changes that killed them.  They were
not willing to spend the money to jump through some bullshit hoop the government
forced on them, so they closed up shop instead. 
  
 Because the government actually listens to industry. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4201790</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2017 00:36:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4201790</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4201790@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Ragnar and LS both have it right.  Government funding and government backed
loans have turned colleges into hyper-expensive non-education facilities.
 And yes, quite a lot of kids would do better with tech school or something
similar. 
  
 The goal should be: go into the world having a marketable skill. 
  
 (A hundred grand of debt and the ability to tell people to check their privilege,
is not a marketable skill.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4201382</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 22:51:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4201382</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4201382@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 [A 
 That and prestige. Everyone wants to go to the nice schools, they can get
the good loans to let them do it, the school will give enough financial aid
to make it possible, so the negotiation becomes "how much can you possibly
afford? At the very limit? OK, give it to us." 
  
 Many kids would be much better served by a technical school or something
a little more local... 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4201337</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2017 19:59:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4201337</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4201337@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Education has outpaced inflation by 6x.  There's one culprit, and it's not
compeition amongst higher education, it's the availability of government backed
loans.  Period. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4200553</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 19:07:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4200553</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4200553@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I like to undermine education costs by proving you can teach yourself an
awful lot of stuff if you're determined. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4200371</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2017 04:10:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4200371</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4200371@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[College tuition costs make me want to cry. I don't care that you can get lots
of loans or scholarships, etc... What the fook does it actually cost? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4199904</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Feb 2017 12:01:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4199904</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4199904@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Well, the problem with medicine, and the problem with education, as far as
escalating expenses go, appears to be similar... at least it seems that way
to me. 
  
 The underlying cause is a lack of competition for the resources required
to provide education or medicine.  The lack of competition frees those who
provide such resources to charge whatever they want (yes, I'm looking at you,
Shkreli). 
  
 If the market adjust to provide competition for these resources, escalating
expenses will evaporate, and all these other weird half-measures need not
exist. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4199821</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Feb 2017 22:49:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4199821</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4199821@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[If possible (and maybe it's not) let's set aside the political implications
and focus on the economics. 
  
 Proponents of UBI assert that as technology makes production more efficient,
employment shortage is inevitable.  As a result, UBI keeps the population
alive by providing a guaranteed minimum income for everyone regardless of
employment.  Some also argue that UBI has far less overhead to manage compared
to the existing implementation of a welfare state, which in theory is true.

  
 One must call into question, however, what happens when we exit the realm
of theory and actually put it into practice.  My favorite comparison is college
tuition.  The more the government subsidizes our colleges and universities,
the more tuition ends up costing.  There has to be an economic reality somewhere
causing this.  Another comparison could be the higher cost of medical services
for self-pay compared
to insurance.  In both examples, costs are shifted to where there are buckets
of money available. 
  
 (Disclaimer: I don't speak like an economist because I'm not one.  But I'm
way smarter than Krugman.) 
  
 So it can be argued that if a Universal Basic Income is provided, at the
expense of taxing those who actually produce something, then the cost of goods
and services will increase to compensate for it.  This in turn makes the required
amount of Universal Basic Income increase, and the end result is rapid inflation
followed by economic collapse. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4199038</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2017 21:07:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4199038</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4199038@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It should be done Friedman-style as some negative income tax, so people earning more than X$ would not benefit from the program. The more you earn, the lower your basic income becomes.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4198406</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 17:17:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4198406</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4198406@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Universal basic income should just be called welfare for all.   
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4198377</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 16:00:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4198377</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4198377@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Gads, that was OT for this room. Politics & Paranoia>... 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4198376</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2017 15:59:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4198376</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4198376@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Back to the discussion on automation, productivity, and the welfare state.
There are two ways this could play out: 
  
 (1) Universal basic income. (Latest proponent to add to the list: Elon Musk)

 (2) Scapegoat the guys causing the problem (software developers) and kill
(US citizens) or deport (Indians) them all. (The Donald Trump approach.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4197766</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:22:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4197766</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4197766@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Just flip a few bits and you can create money from literally nothing. 
 
  
 Bankers and traders have been doing that since forever. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4197668</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 18:46:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4197668</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4197668@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Heh... oh man... that'd be chaos, to get away from cash altogether. 
  
 The hackers would have a field day. 
   
 Just flip a few bits and you can create money from literally nothing. 
  
 Nothing to account for it.  Nothing to protect the economy from malfeasance.

  
 It could be interesting. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4196013</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:10:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4196013</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4196013@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I was thinking for cash transactions people would buy those debit/gift cards.  It is still traceable but works for simple cash transactions between people.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4196012</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:08:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4196012</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4196012@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p><a title="This" href="https://www.google.com/#q=laundry+detergent+drug+dealers">This</a> was a thing a few years ago, I don't know if it still is.</p>
<p>https://www.google.com/#q=laundry+detergent+drug+dealers</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4196011</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 22:04:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4196011</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4196011@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA["The end of cash" is semantically equivalent to "massive expansion of black
markets everywhere." 
  
 Where "cashless society" goes is pretty obvious: 
 1. All within-view-of-the-government transactions become electronic 
 2. Cash payments become forbidden; all remaining cash becomes redeemable
only for electronic currency 
 3. A barter economy comes into existence 
 4. Because like-for-like value is difficult to achieve, some "fiat currency"
comes into existence.  It could be a foreign currency, or even something electronic-but-not-the-government.

  
 From there, two possible outcomes: 
 A. Government cracks down and starts killing anyone found with cash, because
The Russians 
 B. Non-fiat currency comes back into existence 
  
 Of course, the government wants to collect tax anyway [ https://www.irs.gov/uac/four-things-to-know-about-bartering-1
] but it's a LOT harder to track, which means
another massive expansion of your country's tax collection agency (IRS, Finanzamt,
etc).  This by itself could be a motive for them to want to go cashless. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4195897</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 18:41:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4195897</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4195897@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >All anti-cash asshole should die in an ATM fire!  
  
 Starting with Narendra Modi. If you weren't following what he did late last
year, dear God, it was so terrifyingly stupid. Declared probably the majority
of the circulating cash in his third-world country illegal. The results were
predictably horrible, and yet his supporters are so many and so misguided
that he may still cling to power. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4195394</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 16:06:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4195394</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4195394@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The narrative here in Germany is "Cash is bad, mkay?!", too. The Greyfaces are also suggesting, that other countries (ze Scandinavians) are pretty much ahead of us and almost already do it.</p>
<p>The thing is, small payments in Germany are hell, no matter how you do it. There are so many 50€ bills in circulation and ATMs will gladly give you more, that they drive small businesses nuts. They simply can't give you change in the later hours of the day. So you might think that they offer payments by cards... but no! Ze usual german as no trust in credit cards, so the places you can use one are limited. But even normal "ec cards" (no clue what your equivalent is. the ones your bank gives you, the ones that are no credit card.) can hardly be used for small payments. "No card payment under 10€" is a very common sign, if they have the option at all. And if they have one, they are still mostly operated via telephone lines, so slow baud rates. The smaller the shop, the bigger the chance it fails completely.</p>
<p>All anti-cash asshole should die in an ATM fire!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4195168</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:17:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4195168</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4195168@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Jim Rogers prophesies death of cash &amp; total govt control of spending.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The time will come when you won't be able to buy a cup of coffee without being traced, warns investment guru Jim Rogers. To control people, governments will increasingly seek to hunt down cash spending, he adds.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a title="LINK" href="https://www.rt.com/business/377307-jim-rogers-currency-control-cash/">LINK</a></p>
<p><a title="LINK" href="https://www.rt.com/business/377307-jim-rogers-currency-control-cash/">https://www.rt.com/business/377307-jim-rogers-currency-control-cash/</a></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4182274</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:55:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4182274</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4182274@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 It's carefully hidden. The Alphaville blogs are free with registration. This
also gets you access to certain select FT articles - the ones where they want
to get the word out... 
  
 Go to any Alphaville post and you should get the free registration option.
Such as - https://ftalphaville.ft.com/2017/01/27/2183344/americas-growth-has-a-slowed-a-lot-in-the-past-two-years-why/

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4182266</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 19:39:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4182266</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4182266@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>There is no such thing as free.</p>
<p>There is not a free subscription option on the page.</p>
<p><img src="
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4182191</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jan 2017 15:00:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4182191</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4182191@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 It's a free registration. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4181934</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2017 23:56:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4181934</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4181934@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The link you provided requires a subscription.  Can we please have your username and password?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4181859</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2017 20:25:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4181859</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4181859@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Trump wants a weak dollar. He's not going to get it unless he pursues policies
that are unpalatable to his base--or to his buddy-buddies. 
  
 https://www.ft.com/content/2a01d6c2-de6f-11e6-86ac-f253db7791c6 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4180832</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2017 17:29:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4180832</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4180832@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Trump and Bernie Sanders both get the same things wrong: 
  
 http://www.vox.com/the-big-idea/2017/1/24/14363148/trade-deals-nafta-wto-china-job-loss-trump

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4169129</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 20:42:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4169129</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4169129@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Their stuff was so overpriced the rent is paid until 2023.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4169031</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:48:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4169031</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4169031@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >I thought Sears was one of those stores that would always be around.   
  
 Kind of like Radio Shack, which went out of business but the damn stores
are somehow still open. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4160766</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:45:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4160766</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4160766@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p><span style="color: #232323; font-family: 'Crimson Text', Georgia, Cambria, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 17.5px;">Sears did purchase K-mart, this is from the article on Sears closing.</span></p>
<blockquote>
<p><span style="color: #232323; font-family: 'Crimson Text', Georgia, Cambria, 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; font-size: 17.5px;">The store and auto center have a combined 109 employees. Associates who are eligible will receive severance and the opportunity to apply for open positions at other area Sears or Kmart stores, both of which are subsidies of Sears Holdings</span></p>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>Unless of course, Sears was holding it for K-mart.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4160764</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:41:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4160764</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4160764@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I can never remember if Sears bought K-Mart or K-mart purchased Sears.  In July 2015 Sears closed in our city, the K-mart remained.  I didn't understand this, the K-mart was in horrible condition, the store outside looked well worn, the grocery store that was next to it moved 30 years ago, the space was never filled.  The parking lot always looked empty. The last time I was in the K-mart the floors were filthy, cracked and missing tiles. The ceiling tiles had stains, or were missing.  Product and shelving looked unkempt and dirty.  I never understood why they closed Sears but kept the K-mart.  It was just announced they are closing the K-mart as well.</p>
<p>I thought Sears was one of those stores that would always be around.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4160705</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:35:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4160705</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4160705@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[After the Sears company was bought by K-Mart, I thought they'd do more to
integrate, but they didn't.  I actually went into a K-Mart a couple of years
ago looking for some cheap tools that I knew were going to get wrecked from
what I planned to do with them, but all I found were Craftsman tools.  So
it appeared to be on the way, but then it just sort of stalled. 
  
 Black and Decker does seem poised to move itself firmly into the lead now.
 Actually they had merged with Stanley in 2010, so now Stanley, Black & Decker,
and Craftsman are all going to be the same company.  They also announced yesterday
that they are going to move a lot of their manufacturing back into the United
States (MAGA!) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4160241</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 03:09:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4160241</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4160241@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I found this old graphic joke, I realized what makes it funny now is all three anchor stores in that mall are probably closed.</p>
<p><img src="
<p> </p>
<p>A friend and I were saying that Sears should keep their Sears auto, the Kenmore appliances and the Craftsman line of tools. They should reduce the size of their stores to auto services, tools, and replacement items for Kenmore.  Get rid of clothing, bedding, and everything else. Small stores and auto service.</p>
<p>Today they announced they are selling Craftsman to Black and Decker.  Sears is done.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4152856</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2016 19:14:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4152856</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4152856@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Right wing myth? 
  
 My real world wallet tells me that inflation is significantly higher.  Health
care costs alone are skyrocketing.  Not to mention food and education costs.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4152564</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 23:34:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4152564</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4152564@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > [ https://goo.gl/ZbvrKs ]   
  
 The usual tinfoil-hat bullshit. Here are the correct numbers for real GDP:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/GDPC1/ 
  
 But, article says "When you factor inflation, our GDP output is actually
down over the same time period."  
  
 This has been debunked before. The economy did grow, since the recession.
Absolute number of jobs is up (although employment-population ratio is down.)

  
 Output (in terms of things like the number of widgets) is up. 
  
 So in order to believe that Real GDP is down, you have to close your eyes
and ignore all the output data, and you also have to believe in the right-wing
myth that inflation is a lot higher than the official figures. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4152524</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 20:47:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4152524</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4152524@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I did forget the sarcasm tag.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4152464</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 18:25:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4152464</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4152464@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Coming from zooer it's likely that the comment was tongue-in-cheek.  Unless
he's referring to the "they're all the same" party and the "because they're
all the same we don't vote at all" party.  But let's not get into politics
here; the article raises some interesting economic points that are more worth
discussing.   
  
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4152440</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 17:25:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4152440</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4152440@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I would. 
  
 Both of these parties act like ninnies to me. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4152421</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 16:39:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4152421</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4152421@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"<span style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Bitstream Charter', serif; font-size: 16px;"> </span><span style="color: #333333; font-family: Georgia, 'Bitstream Charter', serif; font-size: 16px;">UniParty"?  Who would believe there is only one party?</span></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=4152392</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 14:56:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4152392</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4152392@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[This is pretty interesting. 
  
 [ https://goo.gl/ZbvrKs ] 
  
 Beginning with the assumption that there are actually *two* economies, a
Wall Street economy and a Main Street economy, the effects of past policy
and anticipated near-future policy are observed. 
  
 (Yes, it leads in with election talk, but quickly moves to economics.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3978490</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2015 14:25:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3978490</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3978490@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[It seems a bit destructive that the government is borrowing money with a variable
interest rate that it can determine.  I know that's a *very* simplistic view,
but what other borrower could possibly say "I'm going to set the interest
rate on this money I owe to 0%" ? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3977820</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 17:43:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3977820</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3977820@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Variable rate terms, but with a rate determined by government policy makers?
More or less, yes. Not the worst situation in the world, regardless of what
the permabears and the professional doomsayers will tell you. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3977717</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2015 03:52:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3977717</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3977717@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[So our brilliant government is borrowing money on variable rate terms.  Fantastic.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3964477</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2015 10:15:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3964477</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3964477@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ If you raise the rate then the interest on the debt ("debt service") would
go up, costing more to "service" the debt and making it more difficult to
"pay it down." Just like what happens if the interest rate on a credit card
is raised while you are carrying a balance. Becomes more expensive to carry
the balance. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3964366</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2015 16:14:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3964366</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3964366@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I looked around a bit more and discovered that the person who wrote that article
is a bit of a collapsivist, so take it with a grain of salt. 
  
 What I'm trying to understand is *why* raising the rate would hurt our debt.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3964098</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:39:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3964098</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3964098@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Raising the rate a bit would probably not hurt our debt sustainability to
an unreasonable degree, in and of itself. Those pundits have got the tail
wagging the dog, though: if raising rates hurts the ability of companies to
finance themselves, and contributes to a recession, then the *recession* would
be bad for our debt sustainability. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3964093</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:12:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3964093</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3964093@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 So it seems that the Fed has decided to keep the federal funds rate at 0%.
 Some pundits are claiming [ http://tinyurl.com/o872tdm ] that they're stuck
at 0% because the federal debt is now so high, raising the rate would cause
a deep recession.  I'm not sure I understand the relationship. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3959686</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2015 18:04:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3959686</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3959686@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 For one thing, it's possible that they've just switched from suck to blow
(like Mega-Maid): 
  
 http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2015/08/31/2138871/will-treasury-yields-soar-if-china-sells/

  
 Note that when your whole government policy, from top down, is all about
market manipulation, threatening to "punish those responsible" for "destabilizing
the market" might be, umm, problematic: 
  
 http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/2f11ebdc-4ef3-11e5-b029-b9d50a74fd14.html#axzz3kLRSAxDw

  
 Underscoring the point that I haven't been following stuff enough, this author
seems to think like the balance of China's concerns may have shifted from
inflationary to *de*flationary pressures (what goes up must come down?) 
  
 http://ftalphaville.ft.com/2015/08/28/2138656/guest-post-trying-to-throw-our-arms-around-the-sick-chinese-economy/

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3958814</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2015 18:18:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3958814</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3958814@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[That sounds a lot like the "they manipulate currency and trade policy" sound
bites I've heard.  It also hints that our trade imbalance is made up of more
than just cheap labor.  Am I right? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3958701</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 23:20:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3958701</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3958701@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 They suck. 
  
 They'd been pursuing a heavy growth strategy for a long time, by way of printing
lots of renminbi, using that to buy and hold dollars indefinitely, as one
of the means to constantly drive a trade surplus and drive job growth in their
cheapo manufacturing sector. 
  
 When that started to look more inflationary than they were willing to accept,
they had to start thinking about reining it in a bit, and playing other shell
games that I don't have time to get into (because I haven't really adequately
followed them, anyway.) 
  
 My impression is that the other shell games started to fall apart, witness
the past month's devaluation and the ridiculousness of the "A shares." Also
note that they don't have domestic oil reserves. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3958633</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2015 12:01:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3958633</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3958633@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So what's the deal with China?  Is their economy really that unstable or are they just messing with us again?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3953911</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2015 19:31:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3953911</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3953911@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 A "weary client once defined a bubble to us: 'something I get fired for not
owning.'" --Citi 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3950834</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:22:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3950834</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3950834@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[No argument there, banking institutions are able to manipulate the economy
in ways the rest of us cannot, and in the end they seldom end up losing real
money. 
  
 However, when a writer uses the word "bankster" it is an immediate signal
that the article and the writer are both trash and it's time to stop reading.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3950589</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 20:03:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3950589</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3950589@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >It seems they don't earn their money with banks everybody wants to  
 >remove powers from - which was one of the biggest issues with UK and  
 >the rest of the EU in the last 5 years...  
  
 liberal or conservative or libertarian, if you don't think banks and bankers
have too much power, you haven't been paying attention. however, I'm not sure
what you're saying here. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3950554</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2015 15:29:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3950554</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3950554@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>yea, UK is sort of splitting. They want to decide somewhen down this year whether they want to quit.</p>
<p>I guess if, the scotts are going to have another vote for whether they still want to remain in UK which then probably will result in a divorce, since the scottish are more europe friendly then the rest of UK.</p>
<p>It seems they don't earn their money with banks everybody wants to remove powers from - which was one of the biggest issues with UK and the rest of the EU in the last 5 years...</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3950168</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2015 22:13:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3950168</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3950168@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 it's sort of silly season now. UK is arguing that they should be ring-fenced
from liability to pay any greece-related EFSF costs (EFSF is a EU-wide mechanism
regardless of Euro membership) because UK is not a euro member, and greece
is a euro-area problem. 
  
 remind me again why UK is a member at all... 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3948649</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:04:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3948649</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3948649@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 yeah, but politically it's like... they've got a seat at the table, but the
sign in front of that seat says "CHUCKLES" 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3948626</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2015 11:31:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3948626</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3948626@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jul 14 2015 09:18:22 EDT</span> <span>from LoanShark </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">doubtful? The brits have less of a voice in the eurozone since they never joined. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>all eu states are parts of the ESM, even if they don't have the euro.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3948143</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:24:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3948143</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3948143@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That might be over-complicating it a bit.   At the end of the day, it's all just paper.  Paper is only worth something if everyone agrees that it's worth something.  (Of course, that's also the case with various metals, but I digress...)</p>
<p>What does Greece actually produce that can make their economy work for them?  Sitting around at a cafe smoking cigarettes and trash-talking about the capitalists may be a fine pastime for them but it isn't going to pay the bills.</p>
<p>Until <em>that</em> problem is solved, they can Grexit and Grenter and Groadtrip all they want but they'll keep ending up in the same place.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3948115</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:28:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3948115</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3948115@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 "Imagine if one were to suggest that banks operating in Illinois should be
required to hold large portfolios of Illinois state bonds, with their deposits
insured by an Illinois state insurance scheme, and the Illinois state government
responsible for recapitalization, if needed. The proposal would be dismissed
as economic lunacy. In such a system, a recession would create a self-reinforcing
spiral of deteriorating public finances, rising fears of bank insolvency,
and declining credit extension. And yet, if you replace bIllinoisb with
Ireland, Spain, or Greece, that is how things work in the eurozone.   
  
  
 http://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/greek-debt-write-off-eurozone-crisis-by-adair-turner-2015-07

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3947977</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 13:18:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3947977</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3947977@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
  
 doubtful? The brits have less of a voice in the eurozone since they never
joined. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3947960</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:15:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3947960</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3947960@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>hm, seems as if the brits don't like what the 18 euro states settled on... since it also contains their money (and they weren't asked...) this may become a major show stopper.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3947737</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 20:08:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3947737</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3947737@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Lamb souvlaki for everyone!

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3947644</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 18:41:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3947644</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3947644@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 "Itbs not that it didnbt go down well b there was point blank refusal to engage in economic arguments. Point blank. You put forward an argument that youbve really worked on, to make sure itbs logically coherent, and youbre just faced with blank
stares. It is as if you havenbt spoken. What you say is independent of what they say. You might as well have sung the Swedish national anthem b youbd have got the same reply...   
    
 "They would say we need all your data on the fiscal path on which Greek finds itself, all the data on state-owned enterprises. So we spent a lot of time trying to provide them with it and answering questionnaires and having countless meetings.   
    
 "So that would be the first phase. The second phase was theybd ask us what we intended to do on VAT. They would then reject our proposal but wouldnbt come up with a proposal of their own. And then, before
we would get a chance to agree on VAT, they would shift to another issue, like privatisation. They would ask what we want to do about privatisation: we put something forward, they would reject it. Then theybd move onto another topic, like pensions,
from there to product markets, from there to labour relationsb&   
    
 "We were set up."   
  
  
 --Yanis Varoufakis, (New Statesman, last Friday, sorry bad cut/paste) 
  
 So if half of this is true, it's not about economics, and it's not even about the bad behavior of all those greeks. It's about power politics. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3947451</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2015 17:18:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3947451</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3947451@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Greece to Europe: "well we could just default and leave and then you get
nothing"  
 Europe to Greece: "please stay, we need a whipping boy to make an example
of, strike fear into the heart of Hollande" 
 Greece to Europe: "OK. Your Jedi mind trick has succeeded. Can I get you
a cup of coffee or a tourist brochure?" 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3946907</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 03:05:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3946907</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3946907@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Jul 9 2015 6:09pm from LoanShark 
 >  
 > Veeeery interesting: 


Yes, veeeerrrry interesting.
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3946905</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:40:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3946905</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3946905@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/07/09/argentine-lessons-for-greec
 
  
 Poor Argentina, the California penal system never let them have their pedophile
back  :) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3946904</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2015 02:39:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3946904</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3946904@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Oh, right... wasn't thinking about the room's name.   
  
 Friedrich Hayek and Margaret Thatcher are also shrugging, as they say, "what
did you think would happen, idiots?" 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3946877</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 22:09:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3946877</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3946877@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Veeeery interesting: 
  
 http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-07-09/first-sighting-of-drachma-in-the-wild-via-credit-card-mystery

  
 secret plans in the works to go Drachma, starting to leak out? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3946852</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 18:02:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3946852</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3946852@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > They'll default.  And then they'll truly know austerity.     
 >      
 > *shrugs*     
    
 I'm not sure if things can realistically get worse for them if they default.
Doing so would certainly change the current negative equilibrium, upset the
current impasse, create a new set of facts on the ground...   
    
 By the way, they've already defaulted. On an IMF repayment. This may not
lead to a credit rating downgrade because it's not a default on a private-sector
payment. IMF-speak uses "arrears" for default...   
  
  
 And oh, what the hell. Krugman is not much loved around here, but I might
as well post this graph: 
  
 http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/07/09/argentine-lessons-for-greece/

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3946851</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 17:57:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3946851</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3946851@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Telemachus Sneezed... 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3946839</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:53:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3946839</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3946839@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Oh, right... wasn't thinking about the room's name. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3946418</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:19:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3946418</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3946418@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3946375</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2015 15:46:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3946375</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3946375@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Atlas? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3946127</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2015 19:01:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3946127</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3946127@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Nicolae Ceausescu, as the bullets hit him? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3945866</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 20:25:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3945866</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3945866@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3945844</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 16:42:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3945844</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3945844@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 They'll default.  And then they'll truly know austerity. 
  
 *shrugs* 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3945741</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2015 02:34:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3945741</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3945741@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >so, one keeps waiting for grexit.  
  
 Is that going to happen now?  It seems that the people of Greece just voted
"no" to austerity measures, basically declaring that they are going to keep
spending money even though they're bankrupt and no one is going to lend them
any more money. 
  
 When is it time to pay the piper? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3943936</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 16:09:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3943936</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3943936@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[And the German tv version

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3943907</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2015 12:13:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3943907</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3943907@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[To the German users of uncensored, Isabel Schayani of ARD German Radio and TV visited Utica, NY.  If you come to 
Utica you will be about four hours away from the home of uncensored, you could drive down for steak sandwhiches 
every weekend. 

http://www.wktv.com/news/German_television_crew_comes_to_Utica_to_understand_why_refugees_are_so_successful_here.html

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3924467</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2015 15:37:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3924467</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3924467@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >yeah, but America.  
  
 Yes, I know ... and rest assured there are people hard at work (and succeeding)
at making America suck as much as the rest of the world. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3924076</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 15:31:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3924076</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3924076@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ ' Murrica 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3923835</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2015 08:26:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3923835</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3923835@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>yea, lots of greeks in germany too...</p>
<p>The problem is, that after the dictator was removed in greece in the 80'ies the structures were kept the same.</p>
<p>so, one keeps waiting for grexit.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3923687</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2015 18:19:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3923687</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3923687@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3923609</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2015 02:41:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3923609</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3923609@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It has a lot to do with their attitude, which is <em>really</em> bad.</p>
<p>I have a Greek friend who tells us often that in Greece all they do is sit around smoking cigarettes and talking about how much they hate America.</p>
<p>So their economy collapsed because they weren't, y'know, actually participating in civilization or anything.  So the EU bailed them out, and as part of the bailout imposed austerity measures.</p>
<p>In response, Greece elected a far-left government whose leaders basically said "forget the austerity measures, we're going to continue to spend into oblivion, and all that money Germany loaned to us in the bailout, we don't have to pay it back because nazis, so there."  (I'm paraphrasing but not exaggerating.)</p>
<p>So there's enough drama there to make the situation interesting to anyone who likes to follow the global socioeconomic stage.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3923043</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 22:24:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3923043</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3923043@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 :) Greece has a GDP about the size of... Greater Miami. Or so I'm told. It's
a wonder this tiny blip of a country has caused so much concern. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3923015</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2015 19:27:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3923015</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3923015@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I had lunch at a Greek restaurant today.</p>
<p>And it occurred to me that the restaurant's accounts receivable is probably larger than the GDP of Greece itself.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3777836</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2014 12:09:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3777836</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3777836@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>In germany may choose the plate freely meanwhile since car rental Co.s can Do that anyway </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3777598</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2014 20:40:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3777598</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3777598@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ In California you are required to register your car within 10 days of moving
here. Not a bad rule.  
  
 Now for the story: 
  
 In September 2001 - roughly 3 months after moving here - I was stopped by
CHP. The cp[2op said "I've seen you in this vehicle for a few months now,
and I am going to cite you for not registering it in California." 
  
 Me (never being afraid to share Reality with cops): 
  
 "Well, you can cite the OWNER to your heart's content - it is a leased vehicle
- so cite away. I will just show up in court and have my lease documents with
me. Get the BANK to do it, and they are in NEW JERSEY - not my job!" 
  
 No ticket was issued. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3776026</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 13:26:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3776026</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3776026@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Heh, the idea of a blind person being held liable for an accident amuses
me. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3775969</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2014 11:33:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3775969</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3775969@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Heh... if Google's AI is found at fault for an accident, whose license
 
 >gets points?   
  
 Microsoft will be held liable.  Always.  :) 
  
 The owner of the vehicle is typically the insurance holder, so the owner
is probably still on the hook for anything that happens, and if they're not
liable, they'll be held liable anyway, because lawyers. 
  
 This is the same reason you can't lease a car anymore in some states.  Now
they call it "SmartBuy" and they claim it's new-and-improved but it's really
just a loan whose payments are structured like a lease (low with a gigantic
payoff at the end or you can surrender the vehicle).  Some shyster figured
out how to hold the actual owner of the vehicle (the leasing company) liable
in an accident, so now they don't want to be the owner anymore. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3774935</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 17:33:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3774935</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3774935@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ The real 'elephant in the room' when it comes to self-driving cars is liability.
Who carries the insurance when the car is being driven by a factory installed
gadget? And if there's an accident, is the gadget responsible? The owner??
The factory??? Some, all, or none???? 
  
 Wheeeeeeeeee!!! Lots of Lawyers gonna make Lots of Money!!!!!!!  
 <evil grin> 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3774887</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:45:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3774887</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3774887@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Heh... if Google's AI is found at fault for an accident, whose license gets
points? 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3774826</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 08:17:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3774826</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3774826@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>If every single car is driving by AI on something like a well maintained highway, without such error sources as pedestrians, it might work out.</p>
<p>Mixed scenarios, especially when they involve aggressive, egoistic and/or stupid travelers,  seem to beg for catastrophes.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3769166</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:04:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3769166</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3769166@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Yeah, I was a crazy driver in my late teens/early 20s. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3769165</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 15:03:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3769165</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3769165@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 ......................^^^ Mostly Sane! :) 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3769151</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 14:17:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3769151</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3769151@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Having driven back roads with LS, I'd say intelligence is not the only requirement.
<GRIN> 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3769142</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:58:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3769142</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3769142@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 The AI used for driving a car requires that the system already have the route
mapped in virtual 3-d space, which they update with observations from the
spinning camera above the car. 
  
 I'm curious about how well it can handle driver stupidity. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3768893</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 18:34:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3768893</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3768893@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I'm a luddite... I think driving a car requires human intelligence, not AI.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3768811</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:24:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3768811</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3768811@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ One thing is certain. Ferdi Porsche is spinning in his grave right now. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3768512</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 12:43:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3768512</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3768512@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 'Ersatz', to us, comes to mean 'in place of a real version'.  So, an ersatz
keyboard is a keyboard that one uses in place of a proper keyboard. 
  
 And an ersatz car might be a Yugo. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3768297</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 11:13:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3768297</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3768297@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>http://www.businessinsider.com/why-google-has-become-germanys-boogeyman--and-why-it-matters-2014-9</p>
<p>Google and other big American tech firms have become ersatz targets</p>
<p> </p>
<p>ersatz - another german word in english? or just a not well written article?</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I like this conclusion:</p>
<p>The biggest fear is that Germany's proud carmakers will be relegated to mere producers of "tin cans". If they lose ownership of the data and software that make self-driving cars move, and control of the display screens inside them, the firms' margins will get squeezed. There may be a more profitable business in telling a driver that the product he wants is available cheaply at the next autobahn exit than in building the car he is sitting in.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>(while I right now already think of cars as tin cans anyways...)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3635838</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2014 13:41:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3635838</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3635838@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Everyone knows that I'm no fan of Ayn Rand, but coming from the  
 >commie rag Salon, the whole article reads like "see, capitalism  
 >doesn't work after all."   
  
 *if* you equate capitalism with this one man's wacky management philosophy.
He doesn't sound like a very nice guy to work for, and one can see how the
incentives he created could lead to perverse results. 
  
 I've worked for clowns like him. Aaaargh... 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3631036</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:32:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3631036</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3631036@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I was in one Sears store during the holidays [D. It was actually in very
nice shape. Looked clean and organized. Decent deals, especially on the Lands
End merchandise.   
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3631033</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2013 15:23:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3631033</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3631033@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Everyone knows that I'm no fan of Ayn Rand, but coming from the commie rag Salon, the whole article reads like "see, capitalism doesn't work after all."</p>
<p>The free market is ambivalent towards good and bad business plans.  The free market rewards good business strategy while allowing bad business strategy to fail.</p>
<p>And yes, the decline of Sears is sad to watch.  They were a staple.  Unfortunately though, it's evolve or die.  The same could be said for Radio Shack, whose stock price is less than a tenth of what it was a decade ago, because they voluntarily made themselves insanely un-cool.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3613756</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 19:49:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3613756</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3613756@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 A funny read, yes, but it would be funnier if he hadn't destroyed an American
institution. Sears *invented* catalogue retail and the Midwest was built out
of their supplies. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3613694</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 13:55:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3613694</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3613694@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Man... I liked Sears.  Used to be a solid, reputable company.  They really
have taken it on the chin lately.  If this is the reason why, it's quite understandable.

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3613673</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2013 11:45:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3613673</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3613673@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>http://www.salon.com/2013/12/10/ayn_rand_loving_ceo_destroys_his_empire_partner/</p>
<p>I have no clue about the credibility of that salon.com site, but the article was a funny read. Sears also got what they deserved for messing with their clients warranty questions ;)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3568447</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:56:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3568447</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3568447@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 It's funny, the article mentioned Myron Scholes. Say what you will about
his politics (which I don't agree with), or his repeated failures as a fund
manager, there is no doubt that his work was paradigm-shifting and is now
fundamental to options trading. He probably deserved the Nobel as much as
anyone. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3568141</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 12:39:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3568141</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3568141@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Yeah, that was pretty good.  Interesting to ponder. 
]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3564721</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 01:16:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3564721</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3564721@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Nothing new about liberals making that sort of statement. What hasn't been
pointed out before, is the irony of Sweden (among the least laissez-faire
economies in the world) issuing the Nobel mostly to laissez-faire advocates.
(Think they're having a little inside Swedish joke at somebody's expense?)

]]></description></item><item><link>https://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Econometrica?start_reading_at=3563475</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 11:22:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3563475</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3563475@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 http://preview.tinyurl.com/pppahl9 
  
 God created economists to make astrologers look respectable. 
  
 This is mostly an opinion piece, but I thought it interesting that someone
out there calls out against laissez-faire economics, and touts the Swedes
as having a good model. 
]]></description></item></channel></rss>

