Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 7 8 9 10 [11]
[#] Mon May 18 2026 07:02:02 EDT from Motobike

Subject: Re: Thoughts about modern Citadel

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

At the moment I'm actually using Postfix as SMTP frontend together with Rspamd, and then forwarding internally to Citadel via SMTP on port 2025.

So the current architecture is roughly:

Internet -> Postfix -> Rspamd -> Citadel SMTP

I intentionally kept the setup modular and relatively classic Unix-oriented instead of tightly coupling everything together.

 

LMTP is something I'm currently evaluating, but the existing SMTP-based integration has been extremely stable and easy to maintain so far.

So Mai 17 2026 22:32:02 EDT von IGnatius T Foobar Betreff: Re: Thoughts about modern Citadel

That's really neat.  The current implementation of Citadel was specifically designed so that it can run as a self-sufficient standalone service or be part of a larger software ecosystem.  I'm thrilled to see that you're doing the latter.  

I'm curious how you've coupled Postfix and Citadel.  Are you using the LMTP socket?



 



[#] Mon May 18 2026 07:07:12 EDT from Motobike

Subject: Re: Thoughts about modern Citadel

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Some system specs... Maybe this isn’t the right thread for it, but if you’re interested, let’s talk about it ;)


 

So Mai 17 2026 22:32:02 EDT von IGnatius T Foobar Betreff: Re: Thoughts about modern Citadel

That's really neat.  The current implementation of Citadel was specifically designed so that it can run as a self-sufficient standalone service or be part of a larger software ecosystem.  I'm thrilled to see that you're doing the latter.  

I'm curious how you've coupled Postfix and Citadel.  Are you using the LMTP socket?



 



[#] Mon May 18 2026 09:12:42 EDT from Motobike

Subject: Re: Thoughts about modern Citadel

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Migrated my Citadel setup from internal SMTP delivery to native LMTP

Hi everyone,

after running Citadel in production together with Postfix and Rspamd for quite some time, I recently migrated the internal mail delivery path from SMTP (localhost:2025) to native LMTP using Citadel's Unix domain sockets.

The setup is running stable in production now and works very well.

Current architecture:

Internet | Postfix | Rspamd | LMTP Unix Socket | Citadel 

The migration uses:

  • Postfix as SMTP edge gateway

  • Rspamd for filtering and signing

  • Citadel as backend groupware and mail store

  • LMTP over Unix sockets for local delivery

I documented the migration process, configuration changes and testing steps here:

Postfix LMTP Migration Documentation

The repository itself is here:

modern-citadel-mail-platform

Maybe this helps someone building a modern Citadel-based mail platform with Postfix and Rspamd.

 

And thanks to the Citadel developers for still keeping classic Unix-style groupware alive 🙂

 

So Mai 17 2026 22:32:02 EDT von IGnatius T Foobar Betreff: Re: Thoughts about modern Citadel

That's really neat.  The current implementation of Citadel was specifically designed so that it can run as a self-sufficient standalone service or be part of a larger software ecosystem.  I'm thrilled to see that you're doing the latter.  

I'm curious how you've coupled Postfix and Citadel.  Are you using the LMTP socket?



 



[#] Tue May 19 2026 06:07:20 EDT from luisgo

Subject: Re: Size of Data Files.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I have a personal Citadel email server with 2 users. I again state, a user must have Admin rights to configure the "Message expire policy". Can I give Admin rights to a user and configure the "Message expire policy" and then revoke those rights and the settings will remain? 

Or could that be changed in future releases?

Tue May 12 2026 16:35:19 EDT from luisgo Subject: Re: Size of Data Files.

With a Citadel Network user appears.

Tue May 12 2026 16:13:45 EDT from Motobike Subject: Re: Size of Data Files.

with his own folders / rooms he can. 

depends on rights of the folders. but your own folders like inbox, archive and so on, you can. 

Di Mai 12 2026 15:29:18 EDT von luisgo Betreff: Re: Size of Data Files.

or on an individual room

A user without Administrator level can not do this. Am I right? Why so?


Mon May 04 2026 19:25:09 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: Size of Data Files.

 

Are there some way to shrink the size of the main citadel data file without compromizing the citadel stability?

Do you have the auto-purger configured to delete "old" messages?

You can do this at the site-wide level, or on an individual room (such as your trash folder).

If new data is arriving at approximately the same rate old data is expiring, then yes, eventually you will reach an equilibrium where the database files stabilize in size.

Do look in the Aide room for messages confirming this.  The helpful Citadel Aide will tell you how many objects are being deleted during the nightly purger run.



 



 



 



 



[#] Tue May 19 2026 09:52:28 EDT from Nurb432

Subject: Re: Size of Data Files.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I cant say if it would or would not, but that would be super easy to try in about 5 minutes.... just create a 3rd dummy user, give it admin, change it, remove admin.. add admin back and go back in and see if its still there.

Tue May 19 2026 06:07:20 EDT from luisgo Subject: Re: Size of Data Files.

I have a personal Citadel email server with 2 users. I again state, a user must have Admin rights to configure the "Message expire policy". Can I give Admin rights to a user and configure the "Message expire policy" and then revoke those rights and the settings will remain? 

Or could that be changed in future releases?

 


[#] Fri May 22 2026 11:50:37 EDT from nristen

Subject: Fails to start after upgrade from 1023 to 17792232

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

My Citadel instance is currently 1023 installed using the install script.  After using the easy install script to upgrade, the systemd citadel.service fails to start.  The logs just showed that it exited with and "exit-code".

From the command line when I try running, "/usr/local/citadel/citserver" it returns the following:

 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

*** Citadel server engine ***

Version 17792232 (build 26142) ***

Copyright (c) 1987-2026 by the citadel.org team

 

This program is open source software.  Use, duplication, or disclosure

is subject to the GNU General Public License version 3.

 

libcitadel(unnumbered)

main: running in data directory /usr/local/citadel

ctdl_lockfile: creating lockfile

crypto: keys/citadel.key exists and is readable

crypto: keys/citadel.cer exists and is readable

crypto: requesting cipher list: DEFAULT

crypto: using certificate chain keys/citadel.cer

crypto: using private key keys/citadel.key

extensions: registered server command STLS (Start TLS session)

extensions: registered server command GTLS (Get TLS session status)

extensions: registered a new session function (type 0 Priority 30010)

citserver: master_startup() started

citserver: checking directory access

citserver: ctdl_message_dir is messages

citserver: ctdl_file_dir is files

citserver: ctdl_key_dir is keys

citserver: ctdl_run_dir is .

citserver: opening databases

db: found existing Citadel database in Berkeley DB format

db: initialized Berkeley DB backend

bdb_open_databases: starting

bdb_open_databases:    Linked zlib: 1.2.13

bdb_open_databases: Compiled libdb: Berkeley DB 18.1.40: (May 29, 2020)

bdb_open_databases:   Linked libdb: Berkeley DB 18.1.40: (May 29, 2020)

bdb_open_databases: Setting up DB environment

bdb: bdb_env->open(bdb_env, data, 10019, 0)

citserver: initializing configuration system

You are running libcitadel version 1023

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
At the bottom, I noticed that libcitadel is still 1023.  Is this what is causing the issue?  After I restored the backup and got Citadel running again, I tried the easy install script again but got the same result.
 
I appreciate any suggestions or advice.


[#] Fri May 22 2026 12:01:15 EDT from nristen

Subject: Re: Fails to start after upgrade from 1023 to 17792232

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Also this may be related:

 

root@mail:/usr/local/ctdlsupport/lib# ls -ltr

total 6760

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  477512 Mar  9  2024 libcitadel.so.4.0.998

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  479432 Jul  3  2024 libcitadel.so.4.0.1001

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  479904 Feb 10  2025 libcitadel.so.4.0.1009

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  479216 Sep 18  2025 libcitadel.so.4.0.1020

drwxr-xr-x 2 root root    4096 Feb 24 10:56 pkgconfig

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root  479872 Feb 24 10:56 libcitadel.so.4.0.1023

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      22 Feb 24 10:56 libcitadel.so.4 -> libcitadel.so.4.0.1023

lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root      22 Feb 24 10:56 libcitadel.so -> libcitadel.so.4.0.1023

-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root     835 Feb 24 10:56 libcitadel.la

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2152122 May 22 10:26 libdb-18.1.a

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2152122 May 22 10:26 libdb.a

-rw-r--r-- 1 root root  195004 May 22 10:26 libcitadel.a

 


[#] Fri May 22 2026 12:31:47 EDT from Kurisu

Subject: Re: Fails to start after upgrade from 1023 to 17792232

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Had the same rough issue last night doing an upgrade.

Deleted ctdlsupport contents and that got things working in my case, as my debugging (while very tired) lead to some mismatch that was resolved by freshly recompiling those files. deletion forced that recompile so yeah.



[#] Fri May 22 2026 13:09:01 EDT from Motobike

Subject: Re: Fails to start after upgrade from 1023 to 17792232

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Yes, that’s it. Had the same problem, and after deleting the ctdlsupport folder, everything works fine ;)

Fr Mai 22 2026 12:31:47 EDT von Kurisu Betreff: Re: Fails to start after upgrade from 1023 to 17792232

Had the same rough issue last night doing an upgrade.

Deleted ctdlsupport contents and that got things working in my case, as my debugging (while very tired) lead to some mismatch that was resolved by freshly recompiling those files. deletion forced that recompile so yeah.



 



[#] Fri May 22 2026 13:13:55 EDT from Motobike

Subject: WKD Integration Citade + Webcit

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I integrated WKD (PGP) into the mail flow using Citadel + Webcit.

With Protonmail, it works fine—Protonmail detects the WKD policy and retrieves the key for the mailbox.

 

modern-citadel-mail-platform/docs/wkd-integration.md at main · A2Micha/modern-citadel-mail-platform

 

Greetings

Mike



[#] Fri May 22 2026 13:26:49 EDT from nristen

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Ok, thanks everyone.  Removing the cdtlsupport folder did the trick - now after the upgrade, I found that Webcit is still versioin 1020 (have to figure out why that did not get upgraded.  Maybe I just need to restart that service.  Will try that to see if that does the trick.



[#] Fri May 22 2026 13:28:24 EDT from nristen

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Yep, restarting Webcit did the trick.  It is now current with the citiadel.



[#] Sat May 23 2026 23:31:14 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Re: Thoughts about modern Citadel

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

after running Citadel in production together with Postfix and
Rspamd for quite some time, I recently migrated the internal
mail delivery path from SMTP (localhost:2025) to native LMTP
using Citadel's Unix domain sockets.

Hehe. You didn't have to, it was just a suggestion. But I'm happy to hear it. :)T

LMTP does give you some advantages though, because it suppresses certain behaviors that are handled by your external-facing MTA when running with that mode -- some types of forgery checking, RBL lookups, relaying behavior, etc.

It sure beats the bad old days when Citadel and your system mailer piped mail back and forth through the shell!

[#] Sat May 23 2026 23:34:38 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Re: Fails to start after upgrade from 1023 to 17792232

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Thanks for reporting the troubleshooting, everyone. libcitadel is a static library now so apparently we need to modify the install script to do a better job of clearing that directory out. I'll work on that during the long weekend.

[#] Sat May 23 2026 23:37:03 EDT from luisgo

Subject: Re: Size of Data Files.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The purge is not working for me. In "Aide" appears one message saying that say "105 messages were delete" but really they are not.

I monitored the server and appear many temporary files in data directory until no disk space (of 16GBytes). Stay some time like that and return to 16Gbytes free space. But the emails that must been deleted remained. Two days like that.

 

 

Sun May 17 2026 04:39:11 EDT from Motobike Subject: Re: Size of Data Files.

This works really good for me. I have different purge rules for different folders. The purge will done with

 

 

 

Will done on Auto-Purge Job. 

 

 

My Citadel Version is 1022 now for a long time. 

 

If you want know more about my settings, let me know. 

Greeintngs

Mike

 

So Mai 17 2026 04:03:52 EDT von luisgo Betreff: Re: Size of Data Files.

I think you are providing a semi-featured Citadel. The purge is not working. It supposed to purge the messages from 1st of February and it is not doing.

 

 

 

Mon May 11 2026 10:56:43 EDT from Motobike Subject: Re: Size of Data Files.

You can define a purge rule for every folder. Also a rule to move it to archive. 

 

So Mai 10 2026 04:53:26 EDT von luisgo Betreff: Re: Size of Data Files.

I want to shrink by purging the older emails previous deleted manually. I has the Auto-Purge setting.

I suppose that I can not do it configuring "Default message expire policy for private mailboxes". Or can I? I suppose that is to delete and purge active messages.

Seldom times appear notifications of purged messages at Aide and if so only one purged message or EEDI (??)

Mon May 04 2026 19:25:09 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar Subject: Re: Size of Data Files.

 

Are there some way to shrink the size of the main citadel data file without compromizing the citadel stability?

Do you have the auto-purger configured to delete "old" messages?

You can do this at the site-wide level, or on an individual room (such as your trash folder).

If new data is arriving at approximately the same rate old data is expiring, then yes, eventually you will reach an equilibrium where the database files stabilize in size.

Do look in the Aide room for messages confirming this.  The helpful Citadel Aide will tell you how many objects are being deleted during the nightly purger run.



 



 



 



 



 



Go to page: First ... 7 8 9 10 [11]