Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 ... Last
[#] Tue Sep 28 2010 09:55:38 EDT from boo-boo @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

We won't want any creativity in the world without taxing it to death!



[#] Tue Sep 28 2010 11:30:52 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

As has been the case for some time now, the Music Industry (tm) hates the Internet because they know it makes their business model obsolete. These are the same people who tried to kill off TiVo, VCR's, audio tape, and piano rolls (yes, piano rolls!).

[#] Fri Oct 01 2010 10:43:10 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

having a childish moment here: they should remove the music from the movies that can't be streamed, possibly replacing it with music that can be.

[#] Mon Oct 04 2010 13:21:03 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Complete with links to indie music sites?

[#] Mon Oct 04 2010 20:30:03 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

heh, it should include links to the actual music on youtube.

[#] Sat Nov 06 2010 07:35:44 EDT from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Here's a unique way to ruin your life for nothing:

http://www.keepbusy.net/play.php?id=girl-ruins-marriage-on-game-show



[#] Sat Nov 06 2010 12:34:23 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Yeesh.  I didn't know about that show but it's a pretty good example of why I seldom bother with television anymore.

As for this one -- I'd say that it was her actions rather than the show that ruined her life.



[#] Sun Nov 07 2010 01:14:30 EDT from Animal @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Yea; that looks like a terrible show. Pretty funny though. Sorta like
a bad Jerry Springer episode.

[#] Sun Nov 07 2010 06:43:13 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Oh it was pretty clearly the lady screwing herself over here rather than the show.

The end is appropriate, though, and kind of awesome.

What a horrible woman.



[#] Sun Nov 07 2010 12:57:36 EST from Harbard @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Sun Nov 07 2010 01:14:30 AM EDT from Animal @ Uncensored
Yea; that looks like a terrible show. Pretty funny though. Sorta like
a bad Jerry Springer episode.

There's a good Springer episode?



[#] Sun Nov 07 2010 23:07:36 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Yes, but only because they replaced Jerry Springer with a springer spaniel.

[#] Mon Nov 08 2010 10:44:47 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

They have?

I've been away from television too long.



[#] Mon Nov 08 2010 12:19:42 EST from Spell Binder @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Scripps is at it again.

Scripps Network and AT&T failed to reach an agreement last Friday, the day their existing contract expired. Yesterday evening, lo and behold, FoodTV, HGTV, DIY, Cooking Channel, and GAC were all gone from our AT&T U-Verse program guide.

Apparently, the two companies reached an agreement last night, so the channels should be back soon.

The fact that this has happened before, between Scripps and other TV providers, and between other content and TV providers, really has me wondering what the revenue model is for all these companies. I've been under the assumption that the content providers mostly rely on advertising revenue. If that's the case, I'd expect them to make sure their channels don't get dropped for any reason whatsoever. Otherwise, they might risk losing viewership, and subsequently, advertising dollars.
TV Binder

[#] Mon Nov 08 2010 12:25:06 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Service providers pay the networks a fee for use of the content.

The fee is somehow associated with the number of subscribers.

Advertising is simply another way that service providers and the networks supplement their income.  There's a squabble over that, too; the networks are supposed to make certain bits of commercial time available as 'local avails', but sometimes the service provider trumps the network's spots, violating terms of service (but getting away with it because nobody is monitoring).

(One of our services monitors for compliance, but nobody has subscribed to it in a long time).



[#] Mon Nov 08 2010 12:34:53 EST from arabella @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Mon Nov 08 2010 10:44:47 am EST EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

I've been away from television too long.



Not possible



[#] Mon Nov 08 2010 14:07:03 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

True, that.



[#] Wed Nov 10 2010 09:06:11 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I blame Cablevision.

(yeah I know, they're not involved in this dispute ... it's still their fault)

<grin>

[#] Sun Jan 16 2011 10:10:36 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I did not realize this, but apparently The Cookie Monster has made a youtube video auditioning for SNL.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C-PkQRh3QXA



[#] Sun Jan 16 2011 12:19:36 EST from Ladyhawke @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Coooookie!



[#] Sun Jan 16 2011 12:26:09 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I would totally watch that.

I would also like to see OJ Simpson hosting Saturday Night Live. That would be awesome.

Go to page: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 ... Last