Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: 1 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 ... Last
[#] Fri Sep 10 2010 23:41:37 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The Osborne Effect, perhaps? There will always be something new around the corner. My phone runs Android 1.x but I really don't feel all that constrained by it.

[#] Thu Sep 23 2010 14:12:27 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I wasn't thinking that it just seems there's an endless cycle of changes and if you fork you have to manage all that updating youself.
Where I sit (and most people aren't like this, I'll admit) I'm tired of it all, I just want it to work.

[#] Thu Sep 23 2010 15:13:53 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Mostly what they're doing is backporting new operating system releases to old devices. There are a few changes but they seem to have a good system in place for keeping the build going.

The alternative, of course, is to simply buy new hardware every year.

[#] Fri Sep 24 2010 10:26:19 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

oh, so they get the source to the latest version of the OS then fix all the things that won't run on the older phone? I guess that isn't so bad.

[#] Wed Nov 03 2010 23:33:22 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

it's a pretty good thing. a couple of quirks here and there, but in general it rivals the quality of the hanset vendor's own build, and you didn't have to buy this year's phone to get this year's operating system.

android is very good at the write once run anywhere thing, though. its apps really do run on a wide array of very different handsets.

[#] Thu Nov 25 2010 19:06:20 EST from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Is there a name for the concept of setting a dchp server (or more importantly my wireless router) to hand out the same ip address to a particular mac address every time it connects. effectively giving it a static ip without changing anything on the client?
I justwant to know what to look for in the router config.

[#] Thu Nov 25 2010 19:22:54 EST from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

yes, all thats what you're searching.

the big problem is the 'noob workaround language' you need to backtrace.

some routers have an 'expert mode' that unveils such n00b unfriendly features.



[#] Thu Nov 25 2010 19:48:30 EST from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

But ther is such a thing?

[#] Fri Nov 26 2010 04:31:34 EST from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

depends.



[#] Fri Nov 26 2010 08:16:25 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

"Is there a name for using dhcp to serve static ip addresses?"

On my router, you go to the DHCP tab and enter what they label a 'static entry'.  It maps a MAC address to an IP address and a name (not sure how the name is used, honestly).

I'm using a Linksys RV082 router, which is kinda pricey, but works reasonably well.



[#] Fri Nov 26 2010 11:36:17 EST from Sig @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

At the first corporate desktop support job I had, their entire network was done on an assigned basis; the desktops were configured for DHCP, but you always got the same address because the DHCP servers had a manual entry for every box on the network.  I still wonder if the perceived benefits outweighed the administrative headache.



[#] Fri Nov 26 2010 11:46:03 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Instead of having to visit every box, you just manage everything in one place.  Seems okay to me.

I've preferred it, myself.



[#] Fri Nov 26 2010 12:40:02 EST from Sig @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

It's been nearly ten years now, but I mostly remember it being a headache every time a system moved from one location to another (whether the user was moving, or the box was re-purposed, or whatever).  Different teams had jurisdiction over different subnets; moving from one to another was a non-trivial task.  I can only guess there was some perceived security benefit.



[#] Fri Nov 26 2010 21:00:42 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Ah, yeah, I could see that being annoying.



[#] Sat Nov 27 2010 09:41:29 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Is there a name for the concept of setting a dchp server (or more
importantly my wireless router) to hand out the same ip address to a
particular mac address every time it connects. effectively giving it a

static ip without changing anything on the client?

The official name for that is a "reservation." But as has been mentioned in the last few messages, it's often called other things depending on who built your DHCP server software.

[#] Sat Nov 27 2010 20:58:36 EST from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I *think* I found it, under 'ip assignment'.
we'll see how it goes.

[#] Mon Dec 13 2010 16:08:36 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Dunno whether this is useful for anyone, but it seems that Google has a text-to-speech API that anyone can use.

You go http://translate.google.com/translate_tts?q=text (where 'text' is the phrase you want it to say) and you get back an MP3. It works with any string up to 100 characters.

[#] Mon Dec 13 2010 18:35:59 EST from Animal @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

sweet... this is going to make late-night prank calls so much more fun!

[#] Tue Dec 14 2010 09:58:28 EST from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Oneline servies worry me, I like that kind of stuff to be local, if the computer needs to talk to you it's probably better that it not have to wait for network or even rely on it, but that's me.
Playing with my g1 and reading some articles about it they're getting big into tts and voice recognition, the idea being you can just interact with your device.
The only reason it even half works well is because the sound recorder program is real snappy about getting the data to google. Google can of course churn on it within a second or two and only has to send back a few bytes of text.
Certainly it takes a lot of horsepower, but still would rather do it on my PC which has plenty of horses itself.

Go to page: 1 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 ... Last