Reliability requires redundancy.
Redundancy introduces complexity.
Complexity reduces reliability.
Aug 15 2010 2:17pm from IGnatius T Foobar @uncnsrd
The conundrum of data center operations:
Reliability requires redundancy.
Redundancy introduces complexity.
Complexity reduces reliability.
Gramlath says:
Solution: self-reinforcing simplicity
so, learned a little from that:
http://www.bestinclass.dk/index.clj/2010/08/developer-productivity--the-red-pill.html
didn't even hear about conkeror or neo.
yeah, he's just another stupid piece of shit posting on a website, but I've seen so many of these articles, and they're all wrong.
His 10 tips are good for him. Why is he so small as to assume that what is good for him must be good for everybody.
Hell, forget that we're all individually built humans, and lets just take the more obvious: the job tasks are different.
I write java programs. emacs is not superior to eclipse when writing java programs. Period, it just isn't.
Yet this is what he's pitching because he knows better.
Well at least to me it's obvious that he doesn't know better, he's not mature, or more importantly, not wise, does not see the error of his ways and as a result I can't imagine why anybody would listen to him.
Of course my dark side says he knows exactly what he's doing and the more people you get to follow that kind of bullshit the less people you have to compete with in the job market.
Only one thing might be better than eclipse for writing Java, and that's JIDEA. Lispers, I suspect, don't need that Refactor menu, because they already have good language support for referential transparency, and a dynamic type system. Not the case in Java, where changing structure can cause so much carnage that in a nontrivial program it has to be automated.
so, how do you get the connection from vi to c? ;-P
me uses emacs for that.
Eclipse can do that too,
It just uses > 20 times as much memory for that than emacs (or vim) do...
Not that VS 2008 or the Borland IDE would be any smaller...
didn't know that vi/emacs alike firefox-replacement before, which is why i've posted the link in first place.
Eclipse can do that too,
It just uses > 20 times as much memory for that than emacs (or vim)
do...
So... the only difference you see between eclipse and vi is how much memory they use?
Well that's exactly it - suppose ... perhaps emacs *is* the perfect
environment for writing LISP code. Does the text editor suit the
developer, or the language being used? Eclipse for Java, emacs for
LISP, and vi for C? ;)
Nano for e-mail. =)
Damn... we should start giving our product away, so I don't need to be concerned that it works anymore.
Damn... we should start giving our product away, so I don't need to
be concerned that it works anymore.
This, of course, is most of the impetus behind the free software movement: get rid of all those pesky customers ;)
Mon Aug 30 2010 04:27:37 PM EDT from fleeb @ UncensoredDamn... we should start giving our product away, so I don't need to be concerned that it works anymore.
You could give the product to the customers, but then charge them for the fixes. Or tie it to a particular brand of hardware, and buy shares in the brand.
(Stallman joined the hacker set quite late in the game and resorts to extremism to make up for it.)