Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 302 303 304 305 [306] 307 308 309
[#] Sun May 18 2025 17:53:34 UTC from darknetuser

Subject: Porn bans

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Fun. I think the porn bans they are discussin in the US are prety lame, but there is something ever lamer regarding them, and it is LGBTsoup people claiming the porn ban is all about banning LGBTsoupism.

How narcisistic do you need to be to believe everything ban-related is about you?

[#] Sun May 18 2025 18:14:38 UTC from Nurb432

Subject: Re: Porn bans

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Pretty much sums up all the left groups, and self-righteous worshipers of imaginary creatures. 

 

"the sun was covered by clouds, im being oppressed!!!!"

Sun May 18 2025 17:53:34 UTC from darknetuser Subject: Porn bans

.

How narcisistic do you need to be to believe everything ban-related is about you?

 



[#] Mon May 19 2025 00:39:32 UTC from SouthernComputerGeek

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hypocrisy? I was one of the few conservatives not kissing the Supreme Court's ass during the Biden administration, because I remembered how much damage it had done to the country prior. Hypocrisy my ass.

Sun May 18 2025 16:29:55 UTC from Nurb432

Ah, hypocrisy, isn't it grand when its on the other foot? 

Fri May 16 2025 21:45:59 UTC from SouthernComputerGeek

 

I say screw the Supreme Court 



 



 



[#] Mon May 19 2025 02:00:33 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: Re: Porn bans

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

How narcisistic do you need to be to believe everything ban-related is

about you?

It isn't just ban-related. The rainbow mafia thinks everything EVERYTHING is about them.

[#] Mon May 19 2025 12:04:46 UTC from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

For assistance: "it was wrong when Biden did it, but its ok if Trump does it"  and "We need to follow the Constitution, unless we don't agree with it"  ( yes, paraphrased slightly, but i would hope you are smart enough to get the point. )

 

Mon May 19 2025 00:39:32 UTC from SouthernComputerGeek

Hypocrisy? 



 



[#] Mon May 19 2025 13:40:08 UTC from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

So, Biden has cancer.   And must announce it on the eve of a release of a book that discusses his mental decline while in office.  "hey, look over here at the sick guy!!"

 

Typical. 

 

 



[#] Mon May 19 2025 14:41:50 UTC from SouthernComputerGeek

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Amendment X

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

 



[#] Mon May 19 2025 14:45:25 UTC from SouthernComputerGeek

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

So you see, state legislatures could even ban alcohol entirely. The reason they don't is not because it would be unconstitutional (it would be perfectly constitutional) but because there would be rioting in the streets.

 

And by the way, I am NOT advocating for state level bans on alcohol. I am simply pointing out Nurb's flawed understanding of our constitution and federalism.



[#] Mon May 19 2025 14:47:53 UTC from SouthernComputerGeek

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Following the constitution and following the Supreme Court's orders are often two different things.



[#] Mon May 19 2025 14:51:10 UTC from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Response in the trash if you are interested.  

Mon May 19 2025 14:45:25 UTC from SouthernComputerGeek

So you see, state legislatures could even ban alcohol entirely. The reason they don't is not because it would be unconstitutional (it would be perfectly constitutional) but because there would be rioting in the streets.

 

And by the way, I am NOT advocating for state level bans on alcohol. I am simply pointing out Nurb's flawed understanding of our constitution and federalism.



 



[#] Mon May 19 2025 15:00:52 UTC from SouthernComputerGeek

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Joseph McCarthy was right.



[#] Tue May 20 2025 03:03:18 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Joseph McCarthy was right.

Duh. That's been evident for a long time now. The commies were definitely there, and they've done everything he said they were going to do.

I trust you're aware of the time the whole plan was read directly into the congressional record?

[#] Tue May 20 2025 15:07:00 UTC from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Forgetting about motives ( we can all speculate on that ), Biden was sick, and not just mentally incapacitated, and just might die in a couple of years. ( most likely during term #2 if he had won ) And his doctors knew it, even before he ran the first time. While he was just running, perhaps not, but I thought that all medical records like that for a sitting president were to be public record. 

Heads need to roll. 



[#] Thu May 22 2025 00:22:22 UTC from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The entire electoral system is a lie. From day one, it always has been a smoke screen, to give the impression that we have a voice in matters, to placate the masses and prevent ( temporary ) revolutions. We never have had a voice and never will.  Sure, anomalies happen which reinforce the lie "we did that" but when you look long term, the results are the same, so no, there was no voice and at best, we were tools to advance the agenda. 

The end-game never changes no matter who is in the seat(s). More power for the politicians, more money for them and their 'inner circle' of friends, who DO have the voice.  Reduction ( or elimination ) of the rights and freedoms for us serfs, and sucking even more of our limited wealth to line their pockets and beat us down to be more subservient, or go homeless and starve.

Not much different then all of modern history, tho in the distant past they were at least more honest "we are royalty, get lost serf, you stink".



[#] Thu May 22 2025 19:13:11 UTC from SouthernComputerGeek

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Ideally we would get the government out of the school business entirely, and let schools be run by private entities, like churches.

 



[#] Thu May 22 2025 21:53:47 UTC from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The problem with 'for profit schools', well just look at the current state of colleges.



[#] Fri May 23 2025 00:27:10 UTC from darknetuser

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

2025-05-22 21:53 from Nurb432
The problem with 'for profit schools', well just look at the
current state of colleges.


I invite you to check the current state of socialized schools in places in which they are truly socialized.

[#] Fri May 23 2025 04:17:45 UTC from SamuraiCrow

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Fri May 23 2025 00:27:10 UTC from darknetuser
2025-05-22 21:53 from Nurb432
The problem with 'for profit schools', well just look at the
current state of colleges.


I invite you to check the current state of socialized schools in places in which they are truly socialized.

China will have tens of thousands of unemployed recent college graduates in about a month. Is that what you were talking about? Or maybe they're just casualties in a trade war?



[#] Fri May 23 2025 14:05:39 UTC from Nurb432

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

For my comment, no i was talking about the US college system. its a disaster, due to it being a for profit system.  And i am NOT saying the public school system does not need to be cleaned up, as it does, but the only real way to get common base education working is that way. 

And yes, i do realize im talking about my taxes. But in the end, we are all better off if kids come out with basic knowledge to be productive. Much like roads we all get to use, its a societal investment, so to speak. 

There is also the hidden benefit of keeping them off the streets while us adults move around during the day, at least until they mature. Children do NOT need to be running around un-managed. 

Fri May 23 2025 04:17:45 UTC from SamuraiCrow

China will have tens of thousands of unemployed recent college graduates in about a month. Is that what you were talking about? Or maybe they're just casualties in a trade war?



 



[#] Mon May 26 2025 01:22:58 UTC from IGnatius T Foobar

Subject: In other news...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Meanwhile, noise is being made ... it sounds like the far left is planning on building this year's race riots around the five year anniversary of George Floyd dying of a drug overdose while in police custody. (Or as they call it, "murder".)

For the record, George Floyd's death was the fault of no one but himself, and anyone who disagrees deserves to die too.

Go to page: First ... 302 303 304 305 [306] 307 308 309