Yup. We'll have to have a sha2.irbmanager.com and login.irbmanager.com for
some time to come. Too bad.
It's SHA-2, not Double-SHA... Though that worked for Triple-DES :-)
I have a very dim view of strong crypto. Any cipher that the government allows
ordinary people to use, they've already figured out how to break in real time.
Nobody else has the time and resources to break any reasonable cipher, so there's really no point in carefully choosing a cipher. Even a 56-bit DES encryption will fend off attacks of opportunity.
Nobody else has the time and resources to break any reasonable cipher, so there's really no point in carefully choosing a cipher. Even a 56-bit DES encryption will fend off attacks of opportunity.
But now that computers are faster, 'ordinary' people can brute force weaker crypto methods, if my understanding of the issue is correct.
I have and use an implementation of blowfish. I use it because it was simple
to plug in. wikipedia or something like that says it's never been busted,
but looking at it, and not being a crypto guy, it really doesn't seem all
that bad.
No part of the preceeding data has any effect on any other part of the data's encryption. How good can that possibly be.
No part of the preceeding data has any effect on any other part of the data's encryption. How good can that possibly be.
Umm ... what do mean by "have and use an implementation" ?? Are you actually
embedding a single-cipher crypto layer into something instead of using an
SSL library?
Umm ... what do mean by "have and use an implementation" ?? Are you
actually embedding a single-cipher crypto layer into something instead
of using an SSL library?
Yes.
Although at the moment I'm having a hard time remembering what I use it for.
ahhh, I remember.
Why would I want to suck in an entire ssl library when all I need to do is encrypt one string. That's exactly the kind of thing that grinds at my soul. If I had a soul.
It's to encrypt a cookie.
Why would I want to suck in an entire ssl library when all I need to do is encrypt one string. That's exactly the kind of thing that grinds at my soul. If I had a soul.
It's to encrypt a cookie.
I don't like eating encrypted cookies; they tie my stomach up in knots.
That's because you didn't eat the ginger ones.
WTF is wrong with DigiNotar?
Y'know, I don't know why all CA's aren't required to simply use sneakernet to access their private key every time they want to sign a cert. It would avoid all sorts of problems.
The big ones do exactly that. If the private key is online somewhere then
you're probably dealing with a place like "Bob's Fish Tacos And Certificate
Authority" who issues domain-validated certificates that are issued by a computer.
That's why they're so cheap.
That's why they're so cheap.
Does anyone have any experience setting up a long range ewireless ethernet
bridge? I'm looking at using Motorola Canopy equipment to span around 4.1
miles.
Wed Sep 14 2011 01:26:40 AM EDT from the8088er @ UncensoredDoes anyone have any experience setting up a long range ewireless ethernet bridge? I'm looking at using Motorola Canopy equipment to span around 4.1 miles.
Give me a day or two, I believe my ex-boss set up something. I will see what he says.
http://www.usbwifi.orconhosting.net.nz/
I saw a page with them creating parabolic mirrors with spanning meshes over wooden base construction
generaly spoken...
gives you other approaches too.