Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25
[#] Thu Apr 12 2012 11:40:14 EDT from athos-mn

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Because Nortel's business plan ended up so well...

[#] Thu Apr 12 2012 19:39:50 EDT from wizard of aahz

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

well yeah. there is that too.

[#] Sat Apr 14 2012 19:48:26 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

nortel or nextel? nortel's last decade or so has been little more than dinosaurs mating.

[#] Mon Apr 16 2012 17:06:30 EDT from kinetix

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Well, yes, I meant Nortel myself. That's what RIM's mostly been doing too.
"Nobody'll ever make anything as cool or useful as the blackberry. *arooo* *chomp chomp*" (If that's what mating dino's sound like..)

[#] Sun Apr 22 2012 00:32:47 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

"dinosaurs mating" was the phrase often used to describe the proprietary minicomputer industry in the late 1980's while that portion of the industry was disappearing and everyone was moving either upmarket to mainframes, downmarket to PC's, or to standardized Unix systems.

The overall market was shrinking, so there were a lot of mergers and acquisitions as the market attempted to consolidate. But these companies were doomed anyway, and most did eventually cease to exist; ergo the term "dinosaurs mating."

By the early 1990's, anyone who sold proprietary midrange kit was gone. This seems to also be the case for Nortel along with all of the bits of other companies it has scooped up. For example: Bay Networks, which was itself a merger of Synoptics and Wellfleet.

[#] Wed May 09 2012 10:35:11 EDT from dothebart

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

whew. first tizen prototype by samsung:

http://tizentalk.com/2012/05/tizen-developer-smartphone-device-spotted/

after _HALF A YEAR_. not after _HALF A DECADE_ as nokia did.



[#] Mon May 14 2012 11:47:27 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

When I go to that web site it tells me that I can't view it because they detected I'm running Internet Explorer 6, which they don't support.

I'm actually running Google Chrome 18 on Linux.

*FAIL*

[#] Sun May 20 2012 08:37:17 EDT from fleeb

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Melvin has noticed that I have a kind of odd passive ability to my real-life character.

When it comes to larger purchases, I tend to stumble into good deals without making an effort to do so.

We call it the Clean Living Effect.

We went to buy a clothes washing machine for me, and we got a few hundred dollars off the price several years ago. Later, we went to buy another one for one his family members, and we still got some money off. Went to get a lot of shirts and pants one day, and the store extended the discount that normally would have given out that day (significantly reducing the price of the overall purchase).

You might think the stores just make it look like I'm stumbling into this stuff, except I see that it doesn't seem to work for other people.

So, why am I posting this in Mobile Madness? Because it happened against yesterday. Or, rather, it happened 'again' yesterday, not against it.

I had enough of the buggy problems with the HTC Thunderbolt, and decided to get the galaxy Nexus about which I've heard such good things.

Unfortunately, I was not slated to be able to get an upgraded phone at a reduced price until January next year. Which kind of pisses me off, but I figure that's just the way the game plays.

The Galaxy Nexus is a $600 (or so) phone without discounts. It's not cheap.
But, the income tax check came in, and I figured the purchase would be worth not having to mess with a crappy phone. But the salesperson and the store manager were both surprised when the store computers indicated that the phone would only cost me about $250 instead, without giving any kind of explaination.

They figured the computer knew what it was doing, though, and let it go through.

Clean Living. Be nice to others, and try to help folks laugh.

[#] Thu May 24 2012 12:26:08 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The computer is your friend. At least it was this time around.

[#] Thu May 24 2012 13:52:47 EDT from fleeb

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


It better not find out that I have the Computer Empathy skill, or it might try to kill me.

[#] Thu May 24 2012 14:36:39 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

It just wants to be loved.

[#] Wed May 30 2012 20:21:52 EDT from kc5tja

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Somebody needs to start licking some boots.
:)

[#] Fri Jun 01 2012 18:12:47 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I suppose most of you know by now that Oracle basically got their asses handed to them in court yesterday. Not only has Google been declared not guilty on everything that matters (there was some minor infraction involving $300k in one-time damages) but the precedent has been set that API's are not copyrightable.

This is a BIG win for the good guys. (And yes, zooer, Google are the good guys here.)

[#] Wed Jun 20 2012 15:52:27 EDT from Ladyhawke

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Time to updrade the smartphone and tablet.  My only 3 specifications are that I have no intention of rooting, don't want an iAnything, and am stuck with Verizon Wireless for the moment (due to work).

What do folks recommend and what are you enjoying most these days? 



[#] Wed Jun 20 2012 16:09:56 EDT from Spell Binder

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I just got a Samsung Galaxy Note and have been very happy with it, but I don't see it listed on Verizon's web site. I've got the AT&T-branded model, but I know there's a "global" model available as well. I don't know if that would be compatible with Verizon's network, though.

I do see they have the Samsung Galaxy S III, which is similar in specs to the Note, except for a smaller screen and no stylus. I'm always seeing commercials for the Droid, and though I've not heard anything bad about it, I haven't heard much at all about it.
Droid Binder

[#] Wed Jun 20 2012 17:18:22 EDT from dothebart

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

$GF just got a samsung galaxy ace, and is very happy with it. its her second android, so she's already fammiliar with it, but this one is faster, bigger screen, better touch recognition... ;-)

and its not to pricy.



[#] Wed Jun 20 2012 21:35:39 EDT from Ladyhawke

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Thanks for the suggestions, guys.  The Samsungs do seem to have good navigation.  I hear that the batteries are not accessible though, which seems odd.  Have you heard of any screen/os freezing issues?



[#] Thu Jun 21 2012 13:53:19 EDT from Spell Binder

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The battery on mine is easy to get to. Just pop off the back and there it is.

No freezing issues, but then I've only had my phone for just over two weeks, now.

[#] Thu Jun 21 2012 15:36:05 EDT from Ladyhawke

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Good to know, Spell - thanks



[#] Tue Jun 26 2012 18:38:00 EDT from Soulskill

Subject: Eben Moglen: Time To Apply Asimov's First Law of Robotics To Smartphones

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Sparrowvsrevolution writes "Free software lawyer and activist Eben Moglen plans to give a talk at the Hackers On Planet Earth conference in New York next month on the need to apply Isaac Asimov's laws of robotics to our personal devices like smartphones. Here's a preview: 'In [1960s] science fiction, visionaries perceived that in the middle of the first quarter of the 21st century, we'd be living contemporarily with robots. They were correct. We do. We carry them everywhere we go. They see everything, they're aware of our position, our relationship to other human beings and other robots, they mediate an information stream about us, which allows other people to predict and know our conduct and intentions and capabilities better than we can predict them ourselves. But we grew up imagining that these robots would have, incorporated in their design, a set of principles. We imagined that robots would be designed so that they could never hurt a human being. These robots have no such commitments. These robots hurt us every day. They work for other people. They're designed, built and managed to provide leverage and control to people other than their owners. Unless we retrofit the first law of robotics onto them immediately, we're cooked.'"

Read more of this story at Slashdot.



http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/k6eViUxL4RQ/eben-moglen-time-to-apply-asimovs-first-law-of-robotics-to-smartphones


Go to page: First ... 18 19 20 21 [22] 23 24 25