Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 ... Last
[#] Fri Sep 15 2017 15:01:15 EDT from cjm51213 @ Uncensored

Subject: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi Folks,

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on several fronts. Citadel looks like it might be my answer. Does it support multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will resolve correctly?

Thanks for the help,

Chris.



[#] Fri Sep 15 2017 15:05:25 EDT from cjm51213 @ Uncensored

Subject: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi Folks,

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on several fronts. Does Citadel support multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will resolve correctly?

Thanks for the help,

Chris.



[#] Fri Sep 15 2017 15:09:22 EDT from cjm51213 @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Fri Sep 15 2017 15:01:15 EDT from cjm51213 Subject: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

Hi Folks,

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on several fronts. Citadel looks like it might be my answer. Does it support multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will resolve correctly?

Thanks for the help,

Chris.



Apparently there is no way to delete posts made in error...



[#] Fri Sep 15 2017 15:09:54 EDT from cjm51213 @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Fri Sep 15 2017 15:05:25 EDT from cjm51213 Subject: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

Hi Folks,

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on several fronts. Does Citadel support multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will resolve correctly?

Thanks for the help,

Chris.



Apparently there is no way to delete posts made in error... Sorry.



[#] Fri Sep 15 2017 15:14:57 EDT from cjm51213 @ Uncensored

Subject: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi Folks,

Sorry about the erroneous posts in the Lobby. It took me a bit of time to get oriented.

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on several fronts. Citadel might fit the bill. Does Citadel support multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will resolve correctly?

Assuming Citadel can do what Zimbra can't, how hard will it be to migrate to Citadel, meaning what form of e-mail archive is necessary to import?

Thanks for the help,

Chris.



[#] Sat Sep 16 2017 14:55:03 EDT from Bernhard-72 @ Uncensored

Subject: Log - in Problem after 1st Installation - missing foder

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi all,

Well I really become desperate working on my citadel installation. There is no chance to login on the start page with chrome/firefox or safari. 

 

After installing the suite, I found out, that the folder

/etc/citadel/netconfigs

is missing. Well I can create it myself with the procedure: 

sudo mkdir /etc/citadel/netconfigs

sudo chown citadel:citadel /etc/citadel/netconfigs     and restart it with 

sudo service citadel restart

But while restarting the service, the folder netconfigs gets disapears again. 

Could anybody help please - I'm to give up! Thank you very much!!! 

 

Bernhard 

 

 



[#] Sat Sep 16 2017 15:50:17 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Log - in Problem after 1st Installation - missing foder

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

After installing the suite, I found out, that the folder

/etc/citadel/*netconfigs*

Bernhard - if you are performing a new installation, please use the Easy Install method. It is more current code, more supportable than the debian packages, and best of all ... the netconfigs directory is no longer needed, as all that stuff is kept in the configuration database now.

[#] Sat Sep 16 2017 15:51:28 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on
several fronts. Citadel might fit the bill. Does Citadel support
multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail
domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will
resolve correctly?

Reverse DNS resolution is determined using DNS, not using Citadel. That having been said, Citadel *does* support multiple email domains, though not in the way you are describing it. Basically you can have as many email domains as you want, and each user account can have addresses in one or more of those domains.

[#] Sat Sep 16 2017 21:57:17 EDT from bennabiy @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

IG, couldn't they do a reverse proxy to multiple citadel instances and have the proxy pick it up based on domain?

Sat Sep 16 2017 03:51:28 PM EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...
I seek a replacement for Zimbra, which is proving cumbersome on
several fronts. Citadel might fit the bill. Does Citadel support
multiple e-mail domains? Can I configure it so that each e-mail
domain listens on a separate IP interface, so reverse DNS will
resolve correctly?

Reverse DNS resolution is determined using DNS, not using Citadel. That having been said, Citadel *does* support multiple email domains, though not in the way you are describing it. Basically you can have as many email domains as you want, and each user account can have addresses in one or more of those domains.

 



[#] Mon Sep 18 2017 11:40:00 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

IG, couldn't they do a reverse proxy to multiple citadel instances and have

the proxy pick it up based on domain?

Yes, that would work too. Depends on the individual site's needs. Multiple instances might make more sense if the server is being run for a bunch of separate organizations.

[#] Mon Sep 18 2017 12:17:53 EDT from bennabiy @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I guess the reverse proxy could go the one instance as well, just adjusting the IP to match domain. As long as the instance has all the domains involved as authorized domains for it.

Mon Sep 18 2017 11:40:00 AM EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored Subject: Re: I am considering adopting Citadel over Zimbra...
IG, couldn't they do a reverse proxy to multiple citadel instances and have

the proxy pick it up based on domain?

Yes, that would work too. Depends on the individual site's needs. Multiple instances might make more sense if the server is being run for a bunch of separate organizations.

 



[#] Wed Sep 20 2017 12:02:23 EDT from peterw @ Uncensored

Subject: Centos Server install type

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi, please can someone advise on what type of Centos install is needed before you start the Citadel install? Base, server with gui? Web server?

 

thanks



[#] Wed Sep 20 2017 13:10:06 EDT from bennabiy @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Centos Server install type

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Citadel does not require a GUI, so it is up to you. You will need to make sure you have the required build environment in place to do the Easy Install, but anything else on that, is what you want.

Wed Sep 20 2017 12:02:23 PM EDT from peterw @ Uncensored Subject: Centos Server install type

Hi, please can someone advise on what type of Centos install is needed before you start the Citadel install? Base, server with gui? Web server?

 

thanks



 



[#] Wed Sep 20 2017 13:51:40 EDT from peterw @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Centos Server install type

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Ok, so its not that... I have now done an install 3x using th latest Centos 7 build and installing a Minimal server, it all goes well until the end, then it reboots and zip, nada... I can't get to the GUI or anything.. about to give up and go back to iRedMail.... any thoughts..

Peter



[#] Wed Sep 20 2017 18:52:41 EDT from nunction @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi Support,
is it possible to decrease the amount of messages being written to syslog? I have a fresh easy-install on Debian 9.
 
webcit[7542]: 13 of 13 threads are executing.  Adding another worker thread.
webcit[7542]: SSL_accept success
webcit[7542]: SSL/TLS using AES128-GCM-SHA256 on TLSv1/SSLv3 (128 of 128 bits)
webcit[7542]: SSL started/p>
webcit[7542]: SSL_read got error 5
webcit[7542]: Ending SSL/TLS
....
citserver[7603]: [mail(6)] GOTO _CALENDAR_
citserver[7603]: room_ops: 0000000006.Calendar : 0 new of 0 total messages, oldest=0, newest=0
citserver[7603]: [mail(6)] MSGS ALL
 
Thanks,
 
Philipp.


[#] Thu Sep 21 2017 09:55:56 EDT from nunction @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi Support,
is it possible to decrease the amount of messages being written to syslog? I have a fresh easy-install on Debian 9.
 
webcit[7542]: 13 of 13 threads are executing.  Adding another worker thread.
webcit[7542]: SSL_accept success
webcit[7542]: SSL/TLS using AES128-GCM-SHA256 on TLSv1/SSLv3 (128 of 128 bits)
webcit[7542]: SSL started/p>
webcit[7542]: SSL_read got error 5
webcit[7542]: Ending SSL/TLS
....
citserver[7603]: [mail(6)] GOTO _CALENDAR_
citserver[7603]: room_ops: 0000000006.Calendar : 0 new of 0 total messages, oldest=0, newest=0
citserver[7603]: [mail(6)] MSGS ALL
 
Thanks,
 
Philipp.


[#] Thu Sep 21 2017 12:01:34 EDT from peterw @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Centos Server install type

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

OK, I have to take it back.... errrr, maybe not but sort of....

The "how to" could still be better, it assumes that everyone knows Linux, I am a pretty green convert so am not THAT familiar... 

so on a whim I disabled firewalld and hey presto, it worked...

When I am done I will post up the exact steps to install the OS and all the fiddly bits in-between, maybe it helps someone else out there..

Peter



[#] Thu Sep 21 2017 20:12:35 EDT from danbob @ Uncensored

Subject: insecure user/pass while creating new users or returning users

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I set up Citadel on my server and it works great but firefox gives a little drop-down from the text box that says "This connection is not secure. Logins entered here could be compromised." I have an ssl cert for the site. Can I use this to enable ssl on the Citadel webcit server?

On a side note it says the same thing when you put in form info here on this BBS.

-Dan

 



[#] Thu Sep 21 2017 23:29:20 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Centos Server install type

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Centos 7 build and installing a Minimal server, it all goes well
until the end, then it reboots and zip, nada... I can't get to the

CentOS 7 uses systemd, and Citadel is going to install sysvinit scripts ... a lot of software is experiencing the same problem right now; systemd "supposedly" is set up to honor sysvinit scripts, but in practice it doesn't, at least not on CentOS.

I just went through this problem with vCloud Director. Ugh.

Try these commands to start it up:

/etc/init.d/citadel start
/etc/init.d/webcit start

[#] Fri Sep 22 2017 13:08:27 EDT from bravegnu @ Uncensored

Subject: getcontenttype in PROPFIND

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

When a PROPFIND is issued on a GroupDAV collection like corresponding to an addressbook like http://server/groupdav/Contacts/ the server returns a Multi-Status response. In the returned XML payload, the D:getcontenttype tag is located within the D:response tag. But as per the WebDAV specification this should appear within the D:prop tag. Examples are shown below:

The current response looks like the below.

<D:response>
<D:href>
http://server/groupdav/room/uid
</D:href>
<D:getcontenttype>text/x-vcard</D:getcontenttype>
<D:propstat>
<D:status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</D:status>
<D:prop>
<D:getetag>"1"</D:getetag>
<D:getlastmodified>
...
</D:getlastmodified>
</D:prop>
</D:propstat>
</D:response>

But the expected response as per WebDAV specification

<D:response>
<D:href>
http://server/groupdav/room/uid
</D:href>
<D:propstat>
<D:status>HTTP/1.1 200 OK</D:status>
<D:prop>
<D:getetag>"1"</D:getetag>
<D:getcontenttype>text/x-vcard</D:getcontenttype>
<D:getlastmodified>
...
</D:getlastmodified>
</D:prop>
</D:propstat>
</D:response>

The difference in the location of D:getcontenttype tag causes Inverse SOGo Connector's Contacts support to fail. It will be great if we can have this fixed in Citadel.

Regards,
Vijay



Go to page: First ... 23 24 25 26 [27] 28 29 30 31 ... Last