Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... Last
↑↑↑ Old messages ↑↑↑            ↓↓↓ New messages ↓↓↓
[#] Thu May 24 2012 11:09:58 EDT from mac @ Uncensored

Subject: Spanish translation

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi, I´d like to know if someone has translated webcit and citadel into spanish?

Thanks.

 



[#] Thu May 24 2012 14:46:17 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Spanish translation

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Thu May 24 2012 11:09:58 EDT from mac @ Uncensored Subject: Spanish translation

Hi, I´d like to know if someone has translated webcit and citadel into spanish?

Thanks.

 



the current state of the spanish translation:

https://translations.launchpad.net/citadel/trunk/+lang/es

75%

be welcome to revalidate the first 75% and add the missing 25 % ;-)



[#] Fri May 25 2012 04:20:45 EDT from "K. Grishnak" <henne.gwath@gmx.de> to room_Citadel_Support@uncensored.citadel.org

Subject: block brute-force-attacks on citadel-server

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi,

Some time ago I asked if there were any way to block hosts which are
trying to connect too often in too short time to my server with wrong
creditentials. fail2ban offers a regex-based way to do this, but you
need to know the IP of the connecting host.

Citadel does not log those IPs I think. The only thing is, that it
throws out the IP on connecting like:
Client 0/4/8.05 () from x.x.x.x

Furthermore it shows messages, but without the host/IP as:

Valid User, bad password:
Bad password specified for <USER>

Invalid User:
error: 1 <Invalid recipient: USER>

Valid User:
<USER> logged in

Please add the hostname as something like "Bad password specified for
<USER> from x.x.x.x" to be able to use some kind of host-based banning
with iptables/fail2ban.

Henning


Wed Feb 22 2012 17:14:10 EST from "K. Grishnak" <henne.gwath@gmx.de> to
room_Citadel_Support@uncensored.citadel.org:
Hi,

Is there a way to block brute-force attacks on a citadel-server? I think
it does not log the ip-addresses of hosts who try to connect, so it
seems difficult with iptables/fail2ban. Acually I run citadel version
8.04, maybe this feature yet was realized in the newest version.
Someone does know?

Kind regards,
Henning

[#] Fri May 25 2012 05:02:18 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: block brute-force-attacks on citadel-server

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

since 8.10:

        CON_syslog(LOG_WARNING, "Bad password specified for <%s> Service <%s> Port <%ld> Remote <%s / %s>\n",
               CCC->curr_user,
               CCC->ServiceName,
               CCC->tcp_port,
               CCC->cs_host,
               CCC->cs_addr);


//citserver[5610]: Bad password specified for <willi> Service <citadel-TCP> Remote <PotzBlitz / >
in case of smtp the address should be there.



[#] Fri May 25 2012 05:09:09 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: block brute-force-attacks on citadel-server

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

smtp:

    syslog((LOG_MAIL | LOG_INFO),
        "%ld: from=<%s>, nrcpts=%d, relay=%s [%s], stat=%s",
        msgnum,
        sSMTP->from,
        sSMTP->number_of_recipients,
        CC->cs_host,
        CC->cs_addr,
        result
    );
where result can be

 

        if (msgnum > 0L) {
            sprintf(result, "250 Message accepted.\r\n");
        }
        else {
            sprintf(result, "550 Internal delivery error\r\n");
        }

 

 

    if (scan_errors > 0) {    /* We don't want this message! */

        if (msg->cm_fields['0'] == NULL) {
            msg->cm_fields['0'] = strdup("Message rejected by filter");
        }

        sprintf(result, "550 %s\r\n", msg->cm_fields['0']);

here could alternatively to 'Message rejected by filter' be the error message of the spam facility.

    }

so
stat=550

should be your trigger here.



[#] Fri May 25 2012 05:13:54 EDT from "K. Grishnak" <henne.gwath@gmx.de> to room_Citadel_Support@uncensored.citadel.org

Subject: Re: [Citadel Support] Re: block brute-force-attacks on citadel-server

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I just noticed that I ran an older version, performing easyinstall now.

Am 25.05.2012 11:02, schrieb dothebart:
since 8.10:

CON_syslog(LOG_WARNING, "Bad password specified for <%s> Service <%s>
Port <%ld> Remote <%s / %s>\n",
CCC->curr_user,
CCC->ServiceName,
CCC->tcp_port,
CCC->cs_host,
CCC->cs_addr);


//citserver[5610]: Bad password specified for <willi> Service <citadel-TCP>
Remote <PotzBlitz / >
in case of smtp the address should be there.

[#] Fri May 25 2012 05:43:11 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: [Citadel Support] Re: block brute-force-attacks on citadel-server

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

when you have some working rules, would you like to write a littel howto citadel <-> fail2ban?



[#] Fri May 25 2012 06:06:02 EDT from "K. Grishnak" <henne.gwath@gmx.de> to room_Citadel_Support@uncensored.citadel.org

Subject: Re: [Citadel Support] Re: block brute-force-attacks on citadel-server

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hi,

If you first explain me some more things I'll do it. If I try to login
with some existing username but wrong password I get
the new logline (citadel 8.11), but without content:

Context: Bad password specified for <USER> Service <citadel-UDS> Port
<0> Remote < / >

I think this is due to HTTPS/SSL. Can I get the IP anyway?

Henning

Am 25.05.2012 11:43, schrieb dothebart:
when you have some working rules, would you like to write a littel howto citadel
<-> fail2ban?

[#] Fri May 25 2012 06:13:57 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: [Citadel Support] Re: block brute-force-attacks on citadel-server

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I guess webcit didn't fill in the ip here already...

citadel-tcp is port 504.



[#] Sun May 27 2012 23:57:39 EDT from dms @ Uncensored

Subject: Firefox but not Chrome

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hey guys,

Any idea why my freshly-installed-from-debs Citadel server would work fine under firefox but "Not found" is displayed under Chrome?

Thanks



[#] Mon May 28 2012 05:19:05 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Firefox but not Chrome

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

are you installing with an apache/nginx proxy?

 



[#] Mon May 28 2012 10:45:12 EDT from inpact1 @ Uncensored

Subject: webcit & citadel start

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hello everybody

i have a few issues when i try to make an apt-get upgrade

insserv: Starting webcit depends on nxsensor and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true!

insserv: Starting citadel depends on nxsensor and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true!

insserv: Starting webcit depends on nxsensor and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true!
insserv: Starting citadel depends on nxsensor and therefore on system facility `$all' which can not be true!

i also noticed that webcit doesn't start automacly after a server reboot, i have to make an

/etc/init.d/webcit start


i used the easyinstall , and i allready tried to reinstall

thank you for you help :-)



[#] Mon May 28 2012 10:54:43 EDT from Robert di Rosa @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: webcit & citadel start

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Hello Again

i solved it, it was some conflict with my wmware player !

sorry for my post

 



[#] Mon May 28 2012 17:24:44 EDT from dms @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Firefox but not Chrome

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I'm not. Should I?



[#] Mon May 28 2012 23:12:52 EDT from kafmil @ Uncensored

Subject: Subaddress or Address tags???

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I need to use subaddressing / address tags for an application on my Server. Subaddressing or Address tags refers to the abiity to send email appended with extra info, eg if my email address is info@email.com, I can send mail to info-responder@email.com, or info+responder@email.com and the email will be accepted, with the address tag in place so that I can use it from an application.

Does anyone know if Virtualmin supports this functionality. I know Zimbra supports them but I have been looking at Citadel and VirtualMin, as I am using Webmin already. I can't find any info about support for address tags for either Citadel or Virtualmin.

TIA



[#] Tue May 29 2012 02:47:53 EDT from Freakdog @ Dog Pound BBS II

Subject: libcitadel-8.11 missing from downloads

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I saw in Citanews that there was a new release.

The libcitadel-8.11.tar.gz file appears to missing from the actual source server...citadel-8.11.tar.gz and webcit-8.11.tar.gz are both there, but libcitadel results in a "not found".



[#] Tue May 29 2012 03:54:43 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Subaddress or Address tags???

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Mon May 28 2012 23:12:52 EDT from kafmil @ Uncensored Subject: Subaddress or Address tags???

I need to use subaddressing / address tags for an application on my Server. Subaddressing or Address tags refers to the abiity to send email appended with extra info, eg if my email address is info@email.com, I can send mail to info-responder@email.com, or info+responder@email.com and the email will be accepted, with the address tag in place so that I can use it from an application.

Does anyone know if Virtualmin supports this functionality. I know Zimbra supports them but I have been looking at Citadel and VirtualMin, as I am using Webmin already. I can't find any info about support for address tags for either Citadel or Virtualmin.

TIA



if you mean something like http://www.everything-mdaemon.com/mdaemon/a-subaddressing-introduction , this is possible in citadel with a shared / public maileable room.

have a look at:

http://www.citadel.org/doku.php?id=faq:everydayuse:how_do_i_post_messages_via_smtp_mail_into_a_room#how.do.i.post.messages.via.smtp.mail.into.a.room

http://www.citadel.org/doku.php?id=faq:everydayuse:how_do_i_beautify_the_mailname_of_a_public_room#how.do.i.beautify.the.mailname.of.a.public.room

as you might have already noted, this is the citadel support forum, not the virtualmin forum. you will have to ask that question else where.



[#] Tue May 29 2012 08:02:15 EDT from gefshep @ Uncensored

Subject: Ports and Dates.

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]



[#] Tue May 29 2012 12:50:12 EDT from mtg @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: Solved: citadel-server log: "Address family not supported by protocol"

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Sun May 06 2012 12:06:36 EDTfrom "Jörg-Volker Peetz" <jvpeetz@web.de> Subject: Solved: citadel-server log: "Address family not supported by protocol"
 
Hello,
 
Meanwhile I have upgraded to the debian package from unstable 8.05-3 of the
citadel-server. Before starting the citadel-server, I now stopped the
exim4-daemon on port 25. Then the server starts and is able to open all ports
without trying to use the IPv6 protocol (controlled with strace).
 
I have the same problem with 8.11 on a IPv4 only system. If I can bind the services to an
IP it works. If I setup citadel to a wildcard address it fails. If I use an IP address it works.
Maybe webcit try to use the wildcard address. Is there an option to bind webcit to an address?
 
Thanks
Matthias
 


[#] Tue May 29 2012 15:19:17 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: libcitadel-8.11 missing from downloads

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The libcitadel-8.11.tar.gz file appears to missing from the actual
source server...citadel-8.11.tar.gz and webcit-8.11.tar.gz are both
there, but libcitadel results in a "not found".

Fixed. There was something wrong with the release script and it gave the file the wrong name. (Still broken but I renamed it manually.)

Go to page: [1] 2 3 4 5 ... Last