<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Hardware</title><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/</link>
<description>Hardware</description>
<item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099558748</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 07:30:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: RISC-V</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099558748@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>True. I know this - Intel doesn't - or didn't, around 2003 - consider themselves a technology company. They're a manufacturing company. They used to say, "We don't built technology, we build widgets - whatever we have to manufacture to stay in business, we will." <br /><br />It didn't have to be Intel core processors. They're an industrial company. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Mar 22 2026 17:51:11 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: RISC-V</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Right, but Gordon Moore wasn't talking specifically about CPU or GPU or anything else, he was talking about fabrication process.  </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099558295</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 17:51:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: RISC-V</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099558295@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Right, but Gordon Moore wasn't talking specifically about CPU or GPU or anything else, he was talking about fabrication process.  His metric was that the number of transistors that could be packed into a particular area was doubling every 18 months.  At the time, there were fewer metrics that affected computing speed and capacity, and that was one of the big ones.</p>
<p>Moore's Law ended quite some time ago.  Although incremental advances in process have happened, the majority of the "bigger/faster" in computing over the last decade or so has come from parallelization (multiple cores on the die) and from massive parallelization (doing work on the GPU with thousands of cores).</p>
<p>For "regular" tasks, that's why a ten year old laptop is still useful now.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099558285</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2026 07:37:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: RISC-V</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099558285@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I don't know - for sure. My last understanding goes back to when they FIRST claimed Moore's law was "broken," and other voices said, "Not really." <br />But it wasn't about GPUs back then - it was something ELSE that suddenly leapt into fill the void on Moore's law on silicon. <br /><br />Basically, something ELSE was meeting the criteria - every 18 months. Then - people just stopped caring. At least, consumers. We've had plenty powerful enough CPUs for at least a decade to surf Facebook. Even a Pi 4 can do it. That is what average consumers care about. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Mar 18 2026 18:23:57 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: RISC-V</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>But OTHER technology is advising exponentially every 18 months. </blockquote>
<br />Is it, though? <br /><br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099558139</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 18:23:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: RISC-V</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099558139@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >But OTHER technology is advising exponentially every 18 months.  
  
 Is it, though? 
  
 All of the focus right now is in GPU and NPU density, but they aren't really
advancing those, from a transistor density perspective, any faster than CPU
has been advanced. 
  
 The whole point of GPU and NPU, after all, is that it's "really really RISC"
in that the cores are specialized for high-density, low-complexity compute
instead of general purpose compute.  So they're packing as many of them onto
the die as they can, but the process itself isn't advancing any faster than
it is in the CPU world. 
  
 (This is my current understanding; if I'm full of shit please feel free to
call me out here.) 
  
 All of the significant advancements have emerged from the idea someone had
that a GPU, which was originally intended for graphics, can be used for any
task that can be expressed as "reduce it to simple
math and then parallelize the heck out of it".  From a compute perspective,
AI is just Bitcoin mining on a different data set, and Bitcoin mining is just
CoD on a different data set.  (Ok, that's *really* hyperbolic but you get
the idea.) 
  
 Fundamental advances in manufacturing process could be equally applied to
CPU and GPU. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099557714</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 08:42:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: RISC-V</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099557714@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Modern silicon is dead. Moore's law is broken - at least - from a traditional perspective. <br /><br />But OTHER technology is advising exponentially every 18 months. So, it isn't REALLY broke. It just changed when we hit a ceiling. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Mar 05 2026 18:01:30 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: RISC-V</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>The fact that I still get plenty of use out of a 13 year old laptop should answer that question.  Computers are getting better but only incrementally.  They're packing more transistors onto each die, but they're not really increasing the density by a <em>significant</em> margin, which is why the big stuff now requires water cooling.  Regular CPU's have plateaued, GPU/NPU is a parlor trick of reducing functionality and packing more cores onto the die, but again, not at any increased density.  Quantum computing is perpetually in a state of "almost there".</p>
<p>And I don't think most people need to care.  There's no requirement for ever-increasing density.  Hitting a wall could actually be beneficial.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099557555</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 18:01:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: RISC-V</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099557555@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The fact that I still get plenty of use out of a 13 year old laptop should answer that question.  Computers are getting better but only incrementally.  They're packing more transistors onto each die, but they're not really increasing the density by a <em>significant</em> margin, which is why the big stuff now requires water cooling.  Regular CPU's have plateaued, GPU/NPU is a parlor trick of reducing functionality and packing more cores onto the die, but again, not at any increased density.  Quantum computing is perpetually in a state of "almost there".</p>
<p>And I don't think most people need to care.  There's no requirement for ever-increasing density.  Hitting a wall could actually be beneficial.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099557470</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 05:22:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: RISC-V</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099557470@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Do you think we're going to live long enough to see the next frontier in silicon? </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Serious question. Moore's law isn't "Every 18 months," anymore... and we don't have a lot of 18 month cycles, let alone 3 times that much for each quantum leap. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Mar 03 2026 03:52:04 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: RISC-V</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>That's interesting.  There was a lot of speculation that either ARM or RISC-V cores in high density could end up making a dent in the "AI computer" market -- maybe not for training but definitely for inferencing.  </p>
<p>Open source CPU is sort of the final frontier, isn't it?</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099557412</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 03:52:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: RISC-V</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099557412@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That's interesting.  There was a lot of speculation that either ARM or RISC-V cores in high density could end up making a dent in the "AI computer" market -- maybe not for training but definitely for inferencing.  </p>
<p>Open source CPU is sort of the final frontier, isn't it?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099557392</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2026 17:11:46 -0000</pubDate><title>RISC-V</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099557392@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Could be the beginning of the end for ARM...  and the beginning of RISC-V as a major player, outside of IoT. NVIDIA tried to buy ARM a while ago to get total control, and failed, if they went this route it would be the same effect. </p>
<p>https://www.eetimes.com/nvidia-sells-arm-shares-signals-realignment-of-ai-portfolio</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099556874</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 07:53:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099556874</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099556874@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I mean, they're still building huge office spaces in a post-Covid workplace environment where no one wants to go back to the office. Good luck with that, I guess. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099556843</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 02:29:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099556843</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099556843@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2026-02-17 23:07 from IGnatius T Foobar     
 > >First GPUs, then RAM, soon SSD..        Here soon, us average      
 > >folks wont be able to afford getting new devices.       
 >      
 > It's fun to say "that's the way they want it, they own the power and  
  
 >you have an access device"     
 >      
 > But I'm not buying it.  This is really just market stupidity.  It's   
 
 >the bubble messing everything up.     
 >      
 > They're placing orders for hardware that has not been manufactured    

 >yet, to go into computers that haven't been built yet, to install in   
 
 >data centers that are still under construction, to power applications  
  
 >that nobody asked for, to generate profits that are mathematically     
 >impossible.     
 >      
 > I'm looking forward to buying the surplus after the crash.     
 >     
 >    
    
 This is pretty much what I think. The only problem
is the components they are buying are not the sort of components you install
at home or at an SMB.   
  
 I mean, my main job runs on DDR4 memory at best. Lots of boards and drives
running IDE too. Meanwhile AI bros are buying HBM99999+++++ instead so when
the bubble bursts and those things end up in the secondary market, your Happy
Jack Horseshoes Inc. little firm won't be able to buy them and suit them in
some 8 year old lame Poweredge. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099556254</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 23:07:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099556254</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099556254@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >First GPUs, then RAM, soon SSD..     Here soon, us average  
 >folks wont be able to afford getting new devices.   
  
 It's fun to say "that's the way they want it, they own the power and you
have an access device" 
  
 But I'm not buying it.  This is really just market stupidity.  It's the bubble
messing everything up. 
  
 They're placing orders for hardware that has not been manufactured yet, to
go into computers that haven't been built yet, to install in data centers
that are still under construction, to power applications that nobody asked
for, to generate profits that are mathematically impossible. 
  
 I'm looking forward to buying the surplus after the crash. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099556036</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2026 02:15:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099556036</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099556036@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I mostly buy PCs from the 80s, or new ones that can mimic ones from the 80s, these days. <br /><br />So not a real problem for me. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Feb 15 2026 23:10:23 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=DarfWader">DarfWader</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Market Insiders:  "This spring expect a massive and extended price increase on storage, similar to being seen in the RAM market, due to rising AI data center needs."</p>
<p>First GPUs, then RAM, soon SSD..     Here soon, us average folks wont be able to afford getting new devices.</p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099556016</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2026 23:10:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099556016</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099556016@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Market Insiders:  "This spring expect a massive and extended price increase on storage, similar to being seen in the RAM market, due to rising AI data center needs."</p>
<p>First GPUs, then RAM, soon SSD..     Here soon, us average folks wont be able to afford getting new devices.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099552612</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 15:06:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099552612</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099552612@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>He meant grams of bugs. He just said it prematurely. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>( ya, im not a fan of him either.  He talks a good story, but he really does not care about people, or the planet. )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Jan 14 2026 03:01:57 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">After all, 640K ought to be enough for anybody,</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099552560</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 03:01:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099552560</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099552560@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[After all, 640K ought to be enough for anybody, as Bill Gates once said (and
then spent decades burying the record after realizing how wrong he was). 
  
 Meanwhile, it's been so cold lately that my garage is dangerously below the
acceptable operating temperatures for computer equipment.  So I gone and done
it: I moved the server up into my office.  Completely headless now, it only
has power and ethernet cables going into it.  And its waste heat is now helping
to warm the room and offsetting the cost of heat in that room, so that's a
plus. 
  
 So my grandiose plans for a battery backed 12 volt bus have been scrapped.
 Since there is now nothing left in the garage except the ONT (fiber terminal),
router, and switch, the battery backup in the ONT is more than enough to keep
those three devices running uninterrupted. 
  
 I might get a UPS in the office someday, but honestly, the power goes
out so infrequently here, that it might not be worth bothering.  I've got
bigger fish to fry right now. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099552149</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 07:12:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099552149</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099552149@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>What he said. The weird thing about getting really old is that you start understanding that the really old people you thought were nuts - simply had seen what you thought was "new" a few times already and were a bit jaded about it. <br /><br />Ig basically said, "you're not wrong, but it is probably a temporary thing." <br /><br />And I agree. I've got $6000 of GPUs in my two gaming PCs that I couldn't sell for probably $1000 right now - because GPU supply chains caught up again - but I wanted all that power at the peak. </p>
<p><br /><br /><br /></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Jan 09 2026 23:46:09 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">You're only saying that because it's true 100% of the time. :) <br /><br />On the other hand, I remember when RAM was $30 per megabyte. Or further back than that, when the 64KB in your computer represented half of its cost. <br />I'm not going to panic. Nothing moves in the same direction forever. <br /><br />Wait until the AI bubble pops. The landscape will change. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099552097</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2026 23:46:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099552097</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099552097@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Then graft and corruption means things will remain artificially  
 >expensive AND lame indefinitely.    
  
 You're only saying that because it's true 100% of the time.   :) 
  
 On the other hand, I remember when RAM was $30 per megabyte.  Or further
back than that, when the 64KB in your computer represented half of its cost.
 I'm not going to panic.  Nothing moves in the same direction forever. 
  
 Wait until the AI bubble pops.  The landscape will change. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099551874</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2026 22:31:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099551874</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099551874@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Its not just me that feels that way. The entire industry is in the same boat with me.   As far as conspiracy, tell me what the government does NOT have their fingers in manipulating things?  Nothing.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And ya i have paid high prices in the past too, but doesn't negate what is going on today, which is totally insane.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 05 2026 23:58:40 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>. <br /><br />I don't think memory is NEARLY as expensive as you think it is. </p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099551652</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 23:58:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099551652</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099551652@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>There is this bias toward believing that everything is driven by some conspiracy. Corporate, Government - there is always some other agenda. Shadowy secret global government cabals bringing down the Twin Towers for... *reasons*. <br /><br />I'm not saying that these conspiracies are always wrong... but Occam's Razor is also a thing. <br /><br />I'm not really in the market for memory right now - and the curve that technology is on, at my age - a lot of things I like, I'm going to be fine with until I shuffle off this rock. I'm listening to 1984 on LP vinyl right now - and I'm 54. If I make it another 45 years - the equipment I have now in that regard should get me through - being that I'm going BACKWARDS with the technology, not forward. <br /><br />Same with computers. I spent as much time on 8 and 16 bits as with PCs. So, memory and cloud hosted Ai solutions aren't that big of a deal to me. <br /><br />I can't recall specifically, but I think I paid about $400 for 1.5mb of memory and a memory card f
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Jan 04 2026 22:03:23 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=DarfWader">DarfWader</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Not that i count for much, but i have never seen it this bad..  And we have never seen it due to a reason like this.  Its not part of the normal cycle.</p>
<p>And don't kid yourself, the government IS involved.. to guarantee the big data-center players win, and us little folk, lose out.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099551513</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2026 22:03:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099551513</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099551513@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not that i count for much, but i have never seen it this bad..  And we have never seen it due to a reason like this.  Its not part of the normal cycle.</p>
<p>And don't kid yourself, the government IS involved.. to guarantee the big data-center players win, and us little folk, lose out.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Jan 03 2026 03:46:46 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>This comes and goes in cycles. The market will correct. Exorbitant RAM prices will lead to innovation in a demand driven market - unless the GOVERNMENT steps in and starts regulating. </p>
<p>Then graft and corruption means things will remain artificially expensive AND lame indefinitely. </p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099551337</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2026 03:46:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099551337</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099551337@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>This comes and goes in cycles. The market will correct. Exorbitant RAM prices will lead to innovation in a demand driven market - unless the GOVERNMENT steps in and starts regulating. </p>
<p>Then graft and corruption means things will remain artificially expensive AND lame indefinitely. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099550804</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 12:03:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099550804</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099550804@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ya, its due to resources being moved from consumer to enterprise, and then jacking that price up since they will pay it ( well pass it down to the customers... not one company pays a dime of their own for anything, in effect. )  Damned AI centers.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And yes, that 2TB was Enterprise level. ( or at least they claim to be, i heard its a bit iffy on quality)</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Dec 29 2025 02:21:14 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=PanaSonic">PanaSonic</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Enterprise RAM isn't spiking as much as consumer, </p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099550770</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 02:21:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099550770</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099550770@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Enterprise RAM isn't spiking as much as consumer, and 2TB is usually purchased in enterprise .. but yeah, it's still going to be a big spike.  </p>
<p>Entire lines of consumer RAM and consumer SSDs being discontinued so that they can make more enterprise stuff.  Add to that crazy tariffs if you're in the US, and we've got a recipe for disaster coming.  When this started coming down the pipe, my IT guys were told to spend 2026's IT budget as soon as they possibly could, and maybe even crack into 2027's IT budget, because it's NOT going to be pretty if we have to order any emergency hardware a year from now.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Dec 28 2025 23:03:03 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Think RAM prices are bad now.. just wait.. going to triple next month it sounds like. </p>
<p>And i heard today that 2TB of DDR5, will run you over $40k, IF you can even find it to buy, and no, that was not a typo.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099550750</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2025 23:03:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099550750</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099550750@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Think RAM prices are bad now.. just wait.. going to triple next month it sounds like. </p>
<p>And i heard today that 2TB of DDR5, will run you over $40k, IF you can even find it to buy, and no, that was not a typo.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099550257</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Dec 2025 07:39:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099550257</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099550257@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So... I recently got a hankering for some good old Conan Novels. They're owned and published by someone else, and I bought all 3 "volumes" that claim, "in the original order, as intended, solely by Robert E Howard, returned to their original format... <br /><br />And it turns out, that isn't what I wanted. I wanted the 80s chronological order - with a lot more supernatural and sword and sorcery. L.Sprague de Camp seems to have been the prevalent  author shaping Conan in my youth - in the late 70s, early 80s. So I had to eBay all 12 books from the 80s - Some of the stories are exactly the same - some are the same with significant differences, and some are completely different - and those ones tend to be the ones I was missing in the pure Robert E Howard versions. <br />$140 for all 12 of them - with a cover price of about $30 total - and I had them all at one point, and dumped them. Point is - I get rid of the stuff, and they change it up and it isn't the same, and so I have to buy back what I got rid o
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099550192</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 19:07:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099550192</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099550192@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I guess the RAM shortage is now expected to run into at least 2028.. Another reason to hate these damned AI data centers, as that is where its all going.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and yes, i know, i have a friend who is employed due to this nonsense, but i can still not like its 'side-effects' )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099550023</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 14:42:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099550023</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099550023@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I had several hundred albums before the great purge here a decade or so ago. Some exceedingly rare. I kept perhaps 5. Tons cassettes too. Dunno the total tapes ( or how many were recorded and how many were commercial ), it was a large box full of them.   I did keep my 100s of CDs and DVDs. Not real sure why, but i did.</p>
<p>Literally 1000s of books and magazines headed to the door too. Kept perhaps 30 special ones. ( some really old hand-me-downs from family and some art books )</p>
<p>100s of retro machines, including a box of HP calculators and a couple of printers. Kept 2. Made a few collectors happy. LoL.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Had a friend once, had a 12x12 ( approx ) room as his "music room". Shelves on all 4 sides, floor to ceiling, even above the doorway ( and no window, it was covered ).... all packed with records. Beyond counting, only guessing and doing some math ( i think i estimated around 1200 albums per shelf, and f course had 6 or 7 shelves, and then basically 3 walls of it  ).   He would pull one out every so often and play it "guess who this is" i rarely missed one.  I guess he worked at a music warehouse as a kid.. got stuff for free...  I'm sure its worth a few bills, if he still has it and is still around. ( not talked to him since perhaps 1991 )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Dec 23 2025 05:13:53 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I worry about... I have $10,000 worth of records, at purchase price. Value is significantly higher. <br /><br /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099549975</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 05:14:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099549975</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099549975@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And $50 was low price. My copy if probably a $150 copy. VG++. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099549974</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 05:13:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099549974</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099549974@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I worry about... I have $10,000 worth of records, at purchase price. Value is significantly higher. <br /><br />Same with my comic books.  I just looked up a title I remembered. $.15 cover price. Low price was $50.00 and I've got 1000 comic books. Not all of them are $50 low titles, but a LOT of them are. <br /><br />My daughter is going to get raped when I die by some vulture estate-sale picker. <br /><br />He'll give her $5000 for $30,000 worth of eBay items. I don't know how to tell her no to give in. </p>
<p><br /><br /><br /></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099548979</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Dec 2025 13:25:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099548979</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099548979@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Hmm a couple of older RISC-V boards escaped the last purge somehow. But not this one. Bye bye bye.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099548883</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2025 14:26:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099548883</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099548883@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have one for small things.  like why do i need 15 screwdrivers ( of the same size/style )  8 - 1/2" sockets? or even 2 - 2" ones ( across the entire size spectrum )..  or 4 hand-drills ( since i have moved to battery now i have my 2 + his 2... AND 2 battery powered ones.. ). Once the tub is full going to call family "hey... "  Then start filling it again.  lol.</p>
<p>Some of the bigger stuff has moved on to other family members over time, but i still have WAY too much.  </p>
<p>Its a process.  And im running out of time so i need to get my butt in gear.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( sorting sockets is a royal pain, its hard to read those things.. )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Dec 14 2025 03:57:42 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"> and I'm starting a crate labeled "surplus tools" so that I can make up tool sets for anyone who needs one. <br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099548846</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2025 03:57:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099548846</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099548846@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Well I'm sort of in that spot now, because my dad had 2x of everything --
because for a lot of tools he had one at home and one on the boat.  I've collected
most of the decent stuff, gave some of it to friends (who needs four orbital
polishers, even if you do have a boat?) and I'm starting a crate labeled "surplus
tools" so that I can make up tool sets for anyone who needs one. 
  
 Except for lineman's pliers.  I can never seem to hold on to a set of linemans.
 They seem to be my version of the 10mm socket.  So I'll keep a few of those
around. 
  
 There are enough tools still over there to take care of little projects as
we try to get the house ready to sell.  Mainly garden tools but also a few
screwdrivers and pliers and stuff that'll end up in the "surplus" bin at the
end.  There's a Little Giant ladder that will replace the piece of junk I
left outside and the hinges rusted so much that
it doesn't even fold anymore.  But just about anything special that I wanted
came over here a long time ago.   
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099548275</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 18:27:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099548275</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099548275@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That is how i ended up with a garage of tools, 4x of everything..  My dad was as bad as I.  Or is it i'm as bad as he was? :)    ( we both 'worked' so having the tools made sense, but we would go overboard )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Dec 10 2025 17:56:59 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;">  The only exception is tools -- when you need a specific tool, you need it, and sometimes nothing else will do.</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099548271</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 17:56:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099548271</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099548271@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<p>na, sentimental. i have most all my old stuff. much to my wife's chagrin. </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>The first time you have to clean out someone <em>else's</em> house (for example, a deceased parent) you start to think about the clutter in your <em>own</em> home.</p>
<p>I'm in that space now.  Aggressively.  Lots of stuff is going away.  If it hasn't been used in a year, out it goes.  The only exception is tools -- when you need a specific tool, you need it, and sometimes nothing else will do.</p>
<p>I've got a pile of old Model M keyboards lying around that have various issues (mostly the infamous space bar wire).  I think I might try to ebay them as a lot "as is".  If I can get a hundred bucks for the lot it's a win.  Normally I don't bother to try selling my old stuff but these could bring in a decent handful of coin.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099546280</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 03:24:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099546280</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099546280@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I knew I had offered to buy a Casio watch from someone, somewhere online. Couldn't remember here. Damn whiskey. At least it wasn't an e30 325i BMW... :D </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 25 2025 02:30:57 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=test2">test2</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>na, sentimental. i have most all my old stuff. much to my wife's chagrin. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 22 2025 03:33:27 AM UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099546263</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2025 02:30:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099546263</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099546263@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>na, sentimental. i have most all my old stuff. much to my wife's chagrin. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 22 2025 03:33:27 AM UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Wanna sell it? PM me. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 18 2025 07:55:16 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=test2">test2</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>i still have my casio calculator watch-  with the game. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099545919</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2025 03:33:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099545919</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099545919@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Wanna sell it? PM me. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 18 2025 07:55:16 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=test2">test2</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>i still have my casio calculator watch-  with the game. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099545297</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2025 07:55:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099545297</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099545297@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>i still have my casio calculator watch-  with the game. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 15 2025 05:40:09 AM UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
<p>Support him. I just bought a Casio calculator watch. I was in Italy, a little store was selling retro stuff, and there was an original Casio calculator watch for $200. My wife was like, "Geek, you don't need that," and shamed me. So I didn't buy it. And regretted it. Came home and searched. Casio sells a modern retro calculator watch. $25. No game. I bought it. When I wear it, people go nuts. I should have bought the real deal in Italy. I shame her about it ALL the time - and she feels bad. She knows she was wrong denying me my UberNerd urges. Seriously. She has said, " you know your instincts on things like that, you shouldn't let my response influence you. You should have bought it." <br />Which is nice. Too little, too late, but nice. ;) </p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099545016</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 15:40:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099545016</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099545016@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Tho im not fond of plastic, i actually did try.</p>
<p>I got on the waiting list, and when it was time i tried to buy it but just could not the payment to go thru. Tried it over a 3 day period even got my bank involved.. gave up finally.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 15 2025 05:40:09 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy; font-size: 12px; display: inline !important;">Support him. </span></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099544967</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 05:40:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544967</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544967@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Nov 13 2025 18:33:23 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>So as i have mentioned before, not fond of electronics where it does not need to be.  One example: my wrist.</p>
<p>Go back perhaps 15 years, and i resisted the 'smart watch' movement. No thanks.    But.. a startup company called Pebble, were making minimalist ones, that had actual buttons. No touch screen crap.  Looked pretty interesting, even to me, and when they came out with the 'steel' version, i had to get one.</p>
<p>loved the thing. it was perfect for me. Did want i wanted, wasn't obtrusive, etc.</p>
<p>Then around 2015 they talked about getting into the health monitor businesses.. then in 2016 fitbit bought them to get rid of competition that made a better product.. killed the line, killed the apps, killed the back end infrastructure, all of it.  So all the 'smart' of it was gone, so no point, and went back to only my mechanicals.   They were a few months away from adding color to the 'steel', which looked neat and was on the pre-order list.</p>
<p>I kept it in the drawer for a long time. Got rid of it last year during purging. "this will never be useful again, why take up the space"</p>
<p>This year, totally unexpected, the original pebble guy rebuilt the company.. selling minimalist watches again ( tho not as nice as before, only plastic.. but gotta start somewhere ).. and just today announced the infrastructure is back for the old ones too.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>ARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHH</p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p>Support him. I just bought a Casio calculator watch. I was in Italy, a little store was selling retro stuff, and there was an original Casio calculator watch for $200. My wife was like, "Geek, you don't need that," and shamed me. So I didn't buy it. And regretted it. Came home and searched. Casio sells a modern retro calculator watch. $25. No game. I bought it. When I wear it, people go nuts. I should have bought the real deal in Italy. I shame her about it ALL the time - and she feels bad. She knows she was wrong denying me my UberNerd urges. Seriously. She has said, " you know your instincts on things like that, you shouldn't let my response influence you. You should have bought it." <br />Which is nice. Too little, too late, but nice. ;) </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099544725</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 18:33:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099544725</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099544725@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So as i have mentioned before, not fond of electronics where it does not need to be.  One example: my wrist.</p>
<p>Go back perhaps 15 years, and i resisted the 'smart watch' movement. No thanks.    But.. a startup company called Pebble, were making minimalist ones, that had actual buttons. No touch screen crap.  Looked pretty interesting, even to me, and when they came out with the 'steel' version, i had to get one.</p>
<p>loved the thing. it was perfect for me. Did want i wanted, wasn't obtrusive, etc.</p>
<p>Then around 2015 they talked about getting into the health monitor businesses.. then in 2016 fitbit bought them to get rid of competition that made a better product.. killed the line, killed the apps, killed the back end infrastructure, all of it.  So all the 'smart' of it was gone, so no point, and went back to only my mechanicals.   They were a few months away from adding color to the 'steel', which looked neat and was on the pre-order list.</p>
<p>I kept it in the drawer for a long time. Got rid of it last year during purging. "this will never be useful again, why take up the space"</p>
<p>This year, totally unexpected, the original pebble guy rebuilt the company.. selling minimalist watches again ( tho not as nice as before, only plastic.. but gotta start somewhere ).. and just today announced the infrastructure is back for the old ones too.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>ARRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHH</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099543416</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 22:02:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099543416</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099543416@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >If we really have that sort of tech running now, its going to  
 >change everything..    
  
 Funny thing about that, just last weekend I was talking to a friend from
my church who works for IBM doing exactly that - quantum computing research.
 Turns out it gets done right here in the town I live in. 
  
 He said it's not hard to make it work in a lab, but everyone who makes announcements
about how far they've gotten, all have no idea how to make it work *outside*
of a lab.  In other words, it's so incredibly unstable that unless it's surrounded
by a team of brilliant scientists all the time, it basically disintegrates.

  
 Apparently the accepted wisdom is that if someone says "it's five to ten
years away" it means they have no idea how to make it work in production.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099541870</link><pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 15:58:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099541870</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099541870@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Coming to a cornea near you,  digital contacts..</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( i think i saw this show. )</p>
<p> </p>
<h1 class="ArticlePage-headline">Retina e-paper promises screens 'visually indistinguishable from reality'</h1>
<p>https://newatlas.com/materials/retina-e-paper/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099541597</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 21:20:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099541597</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099541597@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>My guess is mostly landfills.  Most people don't know how to deal with this other than the garbage can.     Which is a shame.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099540171</link><pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2025 15:42:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099540171</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099540171@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"Windows 10 support ends October 14"</p>
<p>Too bad i'm not in the market for new-to-me hardware. Ebay ( and a few others, and landfills ) is going to be flooded with cheap but decent intel/amd based machines here soon i suspect. </p>
<p>And bet prices will drop on some of the older ( but still good ) devices too.  Before i stopped buying and went to downsizing instead i noticed the 'tinys' were slowly going up in price. But all of them are locked out of win11, so the 'unwashed masses' wont want them and i bet go way down in price by end of the year.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099537709</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 23:29:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099537709</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099537709@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I think i just saw the worlds worst featured laptop.</p>
<p>The track pad is where the number key pad would be.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099537691</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 19:34:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099537691</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099537691@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Odd. Still works for me as of a few seconds ago.. But summary:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"In a paper published in the journal Nature, the team demonstrated a system of more than 3,000 quantum bits (or qubits) that could run for more than two hours, surmounting a series of technical challenges and representing a significant step toward building the super computers, which could revolutionize science, medicine, finance, and other fields."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If we really have that sort of tech running now, its going to change everything.. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Sep 28 2025 18:01:11 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>2025-09-28 16:28 from Nurb432 <br />If true, this would be a seismic game changer. <br />https://phys.org/news/2025-09-physicists-quantum-bit-capable.html <br /><br /></blockquote>
<br />I get a 404 </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099537684</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 18:01:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099537684</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099537684@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-09-28 16:28 from Nurb432   
 >If true, this would be a seismic game changer.  
 >https://phys.org/news/2025-09-physicists-quantum-bit-capable.html  
 >  
  
 I get a 404 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099537680</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2025 16:28:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099537680</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099537680@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p><span style="white-space-collapse: preserve;">If true, this would be a seismic game changer. </span><a class="x1fey0fg xmper1u x1edh9d7" href="https://phys.org/news/2025-09-physicists-quantum-bit-capable.html"><span style="white-space-collapse: preserve;">https://phys.org/news/2025-09-physicists-quantum-bit-capable.html</span></a></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099537588</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 15:49:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099537588</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099537588@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not sure the average person even knows the difference.  And 90% of what they do is online now anyway so the OS / CPU is a wash.      I think the cost is the only real factor. High performance ARM is still a bit pricey.   Cheap intel, 'is good enough' for most.</p>
<p>Gaming is the only real sticking point i see now, and from what i understand its moving to the cloud too.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Sep 17 2025 14:23:55 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">. People don't seem to want Windows on ARM</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099537586</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2025 15:44:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099537586</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099537586@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And in lighter news than normal for me..</p>
<p>My 11 year old Galaxy Tab S 8.4" still works.    Its got an otter box case and was going to take it to a family thing later today since its pretty indestructible. Not had it on in years. ( at one point it became 'portable cat tv' but the cat tired of it )  still works, still had a bit of a charge even.    Just dont make things like they used to. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099536067</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 14:23:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099536067</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099536067@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I didn't say it isn't happening.  Economic factors alone will make it happen,
if nothing else.  I don't think we've hit the inflection point yet, though.
 ARM continues to gain ground and has yet to reach its peak.  The ascension
of RISC-V is inevitable in the same way the rise of Linux was inevitable.
  
  
 ARM's peak as the go-to Intel replacement will be brief.  And that's because
what the industry is really doing is pulling out the pieces that pin directly
to Intel.  In other words, ARM to RISC-V will be a far easier lift than Intel
to ARM is. 
  
 Microsoft Windows will be the last domino to fall, if it falls at all.  People
don't seem to want Windows on ARM, and they might not want Windows on RISC-V
either.  And that's ok -- let us leave the last dinosaur sinking inexorably
into the tarpit. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099536033</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 11:19:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099536033</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099536033@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>RISC-V is already displacing ARM in IoT devices. That ship has sailed and ARM is now pivoting to AI workloads. And will fail in the long run.  While we dont 'see' that market in our face, it cant be discounted as its billions of devices.  And its what kept ARM alive all these years.</p>
<p>If it wasn't for Trump distrusting international silicon trade at a pivotal moment, we would have seen some pretty fantastic advancements in RISC-V next year that were on the board.   Now it will mostly be internal to China, due to intent to cut ties with the west, and while it will advance, we wont see much of it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And to be fair, high end RISC-V today can match mid-range intel desktops now. Just are not real common in the west ( see above about trade issues )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Sep 17 2025 03:08:42 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>We have not yet seen the peak of ARM deployment.  It's going to continue to grow, especially as people begin to realize that just about any ARM server runs way faster than a Raspberry Pi.  I'm still doing daily development on the RK3588, for example.</p>
<p>RISC-V will have its day, simply because cloud providers and device makers will relish the opportunity to save on licensing fees.  Today, however, it is still in its "science experiment" phase.  Apple will switch in 2030-2035 if its historical cadence continues.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099536009</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2025 03:08:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099536009</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099536009@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>We have not yet seen the peak of ARM deployment.  It's going to continue to grow, especially as people begin to realize that just about any ARM server runs way faster than a Raspberry Pi.  I'm still doing daily development on the RK3588, for example.</p>
<p>RISC-V will have its day, simply because cloud providers and device makers will relish the opportunity to save on licensing fees.  Today, however, it is still in its "science experiment" phase.  Apple will switch in 2030-2035 if its historical cadence continues.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099535985</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 22:42:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099535985</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099535985@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Sep 16 2025 02:13:57 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=SouthernComputerGeek">SouthernComputerGeek</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I'm beginning to doubt RISC-V will ever take over the way people thought it would. x86 and ARM will not be displaced anytime soon.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099535843</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2025 02:13:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099535843</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099535843@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I'm beginning to doubt RISC-V will ever take over the way people thought it would. x86 and ARM will not be displaced anytime soon.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099534215</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2025 02:34:52 -0000</pubDate><title>One step closer to my 12 volt paradise</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099534215@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>You've heard about how I tapped into the battery backup of my fiber terminal (ONT) and pulled off a 12 volt supply to run my router.  Today I added a 12 volt to 9 volt DC-DC converter so I can also use it to power my ethernet switch.</p>
<p><img src="
<p>When it comes to DC-DC converters, you've got to go YRDZXG brand.  Accept no substitutes!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099532871</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2025 22:11:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099532871</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099532871@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well NVIDIA "Thor" is out now.</p>
<p>Scary fast, with 128G..  But its 3.5k.   Not i cant afford it, but no way to rationalize that much for a hobby, that i hardly even do now.  My Xaiver spends most of its time in the closet now since im mostly non-tech these days other than music and video, and my e-reader.. on purpose. But man, it would fly....</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099527152</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 00:45:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099527152</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099527152@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>ooo and they have a version coming that is pin compatible with the NVIDIA jetson xaiver series and about the same performance.   Cool.  Even tho im not really into that stuff anymore, if i can find one that isn't tariffed out of being reasonable, i might have to get one.  I might have a spare carrier board left in the closet still....</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( Milk-V Megrez NX )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099527143</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2025 00:22:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099527143</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099527143@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"milk v megrez"     new risc-v board from milk-v.</p>
<p>Not quite what they promised us last year with that failed to deliver product, due to not being able to make the chips due to all the damned tariffs and restrictions..    But not bad either, might be usable for daily life.  Too bad its shipping from mainland, so its price will be stupid after the Trump fee is added. ( unless its banned totally and have to get it via 'alternative sources' )</p>
<p>Not a speed demon CPU, but enough, and its got an acceptable NPU + onboard GPU, plus a standard PCI slot if you want to go all out on GPU.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Damned politics get in the way of tech once again.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099522135</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 00:01:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099522135</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099522135@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2025-04-19 16:12 from IGnatius T Foobar   
 > > Ooops, text client screwup. Anyway, this device is supposedly fine  

 >at   
 >   
 > >the block layer (99% health remaining based on total bytes written)  

 >so   
 >   
 > >this is a PCIe PHY issue. not sure what to make of it.     
 >    
 > Are any of the other SMART diagnostics available?  Total bytes written
 
 >is a good estimator of remaining service life under normal conditions, 
 
 >but I'd be more interested in the number of error recoveries and block 
 
 >relocations it had to do, things like that.     
 >    
 > If it were a device in a data center grade storage array, anything   
 >past a certain number of recoveries and relocations, it would consider 
 
 >the module to be on its death bed, and proactively evacuate it and tell
 
 >you to replace it.   
 >    
 > I get it though, you're spending your own money like the rest
of us,   
 >and want to try hard not to replace anything that isn't truly broken.  

 >   
 >  
  
 Yesterday I replaced the damned drive. I'm not aware of any error recovery
or block relocation stats from SMART, but I surmise that wear leveling should
take care of all that, and supposedly this drive has seen very little wear.
So from what I can tell, the problems were all with the controller and the
PCIe physical interface layer. But that just seemed to get gradually worse
and worse. 
  
 I replaced it with a Western Digital and based on all the forum comments
about people RMAing their whole datacenter fleet of Samsung 990 Pros, I will
probably not be buying Samsung again any time soon. Left a bad taste in my
mouth. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099520953</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2025 13:55:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Paranoia?</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099520953@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p><span style="color: #004d40; font-family: Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px; letter-spacing: 0.2px; white-space-collapse: preserve;">Perhaps im less paranoid than i should be, but considering that monitoring this stuff via cellar is normal in that tech, i bet this is just a case of mistaken intent, to fuel the dislike for china. -&gt; https://industrialcyber.co/utilities-energy-power-water-waste/us-energy-sector-at-risk-as-chinese-inverters-are-under-investigation-for-suspicious-communication-gear/</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #004d40; font-family: Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px; letter-spacing: 0.2px; white-space-collapse: preserve;">I have a feeling that worst case it was a 'should have disclosed' but it was really SoP, that everyone does at that level, so no one thought about mentioning it.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #004d40; font-family: Roboto, 'Helvetica Neue', sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px; letter-spacing: 0.2px; white-space-collapse: preserve;">If im right, next up: "that ESP32 based smart outlet checked in with china for firmware updates.." um, well.. of course it did.</span></span></p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099520311</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2025 16:46:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099520311</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099520311@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm really surprised that the Teamsters aren't fighting this in a very visible
and loud and potentially violent way.   
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099519094</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2025 22:55:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099519094</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099519094@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Could sort of go in several rooms... news clip i saw today below.   I also thought i heard it was being done it in another state, in the Midwest, limited runs.  ( not same company tho, i dont think ).    Sounds like long haul truckers are about to become obsolete.. and unemployed. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Aurora Innovation has launched a commercial self-driving truck service in Texas, making it the first company to deploy driverless, heavy-duty trucks for commercial use on public roads in the US. These trucks are making deliveries between Dallas and Houston. The company plans to expand to other locations like El Paso and Phoenix, according to TechCrunch. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099517218</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2025 16:12:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099517218</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099517218@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Ooops, text client screwup. Anyway, this device is supposedly fine at 
 
 >the block layer (99% health remaining based on total bytes written) so 
 
 >this is a PCIe PHY issue. not sure what to make of it.   
  
 Are any of the other SMART diagnostics available?  Total bytes written is
a good estimator of remaining service life under normal conditions, but I'd
be more interested in the number of error recoveries and block relocations
it had to do, things like that.   
  
 If it were a device in a data center grade storage array, anything past a
certain number of recoveries and relocations, it would consider the module
to be on its death bed, and proactively evacuate it and tell you to replace
it. 
  
 I get it though, you're spending your own money like the rest of us, and
want to try hard not to replace anything that isn't truly broken. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514711</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 14:03:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514711</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514711@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>You can thank Microsoft for that.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Apr 01 2025 13:44:29 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br /> only happened under Linux</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514706</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2025 13:44:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514706</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514706@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Basically, it's hard to determine how widespread this is as a percentage
of the Samsung 990 Pro user base; forum posts don't give me the denominator.
But there's enough complaints about ASPM issues and PCIe bus errors to suspect
that there's some sort of unacknowledged issue and that this may be fairly
"normal" for this device, i.e. I might not be able to run it at full speed
without "correctable" bus errors and/or might not be able to run it with ASPM
fully enabled without the device occasionally falling off the bus. Some people
posting on forums have gone so far as to RMA their entire datacenter fleet
of 990 Pro's and move to a different vendor. 
  
 I had a few incidents of the device entirely ceasing to respond (dropping
off the PCI bus, as if it wasn't even connected until a power cycle restored
it), but so far that has only happened under Linux and only in the previous
machine and only prior to a BIOS update... 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514587</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 15:35:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514587</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514587@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
  
 Ooops, text client screwup. Anyway, this device is supposedly fine at the
block layer (99% health remaining based on total bytes written) so this is
a PCIe PHY issue. not sure what to make of it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514586</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 15:34:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514586</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514586@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Been there too many times with SSD.   Suddenly starts slowing  
 >down trying to keep up with error corrections. Then dead. ( a  
  
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514554</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:50:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514554</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514554@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I guess with older tech too.. Floppies, spinny drives, tape.. whatever.</p>
<p>But most of the time back then for me it was just 'poof' .. rarely got a chance to get stuff off.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Mar 31 2025 13:41:23 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<p>Been there too many times with SSD.   <span style="background-color: transparent;"> </span></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514553</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:41:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514553</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514553@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>To me, it sounds like its struggling to stay alive.  Slowing it down is just a short term bandaid and it will hard fail next.</p>
<p>Been there too many times with SSD.   Suddenly starts slowing down trying to keep up with error corrections. Then dead. ( a couple of times before i could get the stuff off.   it died during that process )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Mar 31 2025 13:23:33 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />It might take more time before I really know for sure, but so far, the PCIe bus errors from the NVMe seem to go away if I limit the link speed to PCIe v3.0. Not sure how I feel about that... I paid for v4.0 obviously. <br /><br /><br />Don't want the hassle of going through a warranty claim and transferring all my data to a new drive, either, though. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514551</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2025 13:23:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514551</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514551@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 It might take more time before I really know for sure, but so far, the PCIe
bus errors from the NVMe seem to go away if I limit the link speed to PCIe
v3.0. Not sure how I feel about that... I paid for v4.0 obviously.   
  
  
 Don't want the hassle of going through a warranty claim and transferring
all my data to a new drive, either, though. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514417</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 22:34:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514417</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514417@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Back in the late 80s i got a call about a monitor that was not coming on. Since it was a tube, i had the guy flip the power as i looked inside the vents in the back, just to see if it was getting power at all.    Flame about hit me in the face. One of the resistors decided to cut loose.    "ok, ill get you a new monitor, hang on"  lol        I guess if i was able to smell, i might have noticed it when i entered the room.</p>
<p>Had a dell desktop do that too. About caught the wall on fire behind it.  Next day a laptop caught on fire, also a dell, due to its poor design.  Never been fond of them since.</p>
<p>Another time, same company as the flaming resistor, different area, one of the engineers that designed automotive chips called. "my monitor isn't turning on".  In this office the monitors faced away from the front door so i could see the cord was missing instantly. I walked in, went over to his machine, picked the power cord off the floor and plugged it in to the monitor, and didn't say a word...  He watched me do it.. turned bright red.. "oh god. im sorry "</p>
<p>Or the time i forgot to discharge the tube on a terminal, as i was busy talking to the user, and stuck my paw in it to swap out the board..   </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Ah fun times. Kids today will never understand </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Mar 29 2025 21:53:45 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>Decades ago, had a PS catch fire on a mini-tower ( 386 days ). </blockquote>
<br />Back when I worked at a VAR doing PC builds and troubleshooting, every time we got a Packard Bell in we knew the PSU was likely dead. I worked on one that you could smell it burning up. <br /><br />Packard Smell. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514413</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 21:54:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514413</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514413@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I also don't recommend plugging in Xbox controllers that may or may not have
been covered in cat vomit, although that may be a topic for Pussy> 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514412</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 21:53:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514412</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514412@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Decades ago, had a PS catch fire on a mini-tower ( 386 days ).  
  
 Back when I worked at a VAR doing PC builds and troubleshooting, every time
we got a Packard Bell in we knew the PSU was likely dead. I worked on one
that you could smell it burning up. 
  
 Packard Smell. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514411</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 21:50:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514411</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514411@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 A few comments on the Raptor Lake setup -  
  
 * Asus motherboard, the TUF B760-Plus Wifi I think it's called. BIOS defaults
to fairly conservative PL1/PL2 settings that cost me about 17% performance
in CineBench 
 * I'm using fairly high-end cooling, albeit air cooling. You can lift the
power limits in the BIOS. There's also a middle-of-the-road option that lifts
the power limits BUT limits the CPU temperature to 90C. This is what I've
settled on. It makes about a 40W difference in power consumption and about
a 2.5% difference in CineBench, which might be within the margin of error.
Power limits are user configurable to whatever wattages you feel are right
for your setup. 
  
 This, plus Intel's recent root cause analyis I think should address any concerns
about CPUs burning themselves up. Unless you really just choose not to believe
Intel's root cause 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514410</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 21:47:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514410</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514410@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Wait, no, it might have been a 486..  or perhaps even a early Pentium.  its been so long i dont remember now.  20 years or so, and it wasn't new at the time..</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514409</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 21:45:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514409</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514409@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I had a USB attached litecoin miner once. It caught fire. Literally, flames coming out of the fan. Thankfully i only ran it when i was home so i was 2 feet away when it did.</p>
<p>It took out ALL the USB ports on the PC it was connected to.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Decades ago, had a PS catch fire on a mini-tower ( 386 days ). Took out the mother board, CPU, RAM even the HD and CDROM drive was toast.  Never seen such a thing before. Sure, bits and pieces but not *everything*</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514408</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 21:43:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514408</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514408@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 Oh, I meant to add that all the other front-panel USB ports (and one of the
back-panel ones) got fried quite some time ago by devices that were probably
shorting (e.g. a bad Xbox controller)   
  
  
 So it's been a case of gradually losing USB ports for a few years now, and
just saying "I'll live with it until it becomes unacceptable", and it finally
became unacceptable. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514407</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 21:41:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514407</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514407@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Ouch.  Took a pretty bad hit?   
 >    
 > At that point I'd be worried that none of the surviving parts would   
 >ever be quite right again.  Starting a new build (except for maybe the 
 
 >storage or whatever) seems the right way to go, especially if it's a   
 >daily driver that you rely on.   
  
 I'm not entirely sure what happened. The wireless card I had installed was
pretty typical: an ASUS with a Mediatek chipset, where the WiFi domain connects
via PCIe, and the Bluetooth domain talks to one of your unused internal USB2
headers on the motherboard. As far as I can tell, basically all the products
on the market work this way. 
  
 It had been working fine under Windows for quite some time, but I started
trying to use it under Linux, realized I had to upgrade `linux-firmware` to
get it working, and went through the whole procedure of upgrading Ubuntu etc.
It initially seemed flakey
when I finally got it working *at all*, but then seemed to be working just
fine for an hour or two (not sure if that was anything I did), and then it
decided to fry the motherboard's USB connector that it was hooked up to. I
messed around a bit, tried all the other internal USB2 headers, bought another
WiFi card, etc, no dice, decided to just upgrade the system. 
  
 My thinking is the same as yours; many components are suspect, so I only
moved the storage devices over. Things had been a bit wonky for a while, a
few times Linux caused the NVMe to crash. The PSU was a suspect, and it's
rather ancient so I condemned it as well. 
  
 The new build seems mostly fine (I'm typing this from it right now) but there's
still a bit of wonkiness where both Linux and Windows logs show occasional
correctable PCIe bus errors on the port that talks to the Samsung 990 Pro
(which is fairly new, and I've got
enough experience with similar issues on prior Samsung products that I suspect
they may eventually push a firmware fix.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514384</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2025 16:20:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514384</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514384@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Upgrading from a Ryzen 3900X to an i7-14700KF not because I really   
 >wanted to, but because all the offboard USB ports on the motherboard   
 >(except for most of the back-panel ones) are now completely fried.   
  
 Ouch.  Took a pretty bad hit? 
  
 At that point I'd be worried that none of the surviving parts would ever
be quite right again.  Starting a new build (except for maybe the storage
or whatever) seems the right way to go, especially if it's a daily driver
that you rely on. 
  
 Good luck with your build! 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514268</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 17:53:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514268</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514268@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I think Raptor Lake is OK now that they've ironed out the microcode issues.
A little less power efficient than Ryzen 9000 series at the top end of the
curve, but more efficient at idle which is where it counts. Better buy at
current market prices from what I can tell. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514253</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 16:22:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514253</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514253@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>the last couple have been. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 28 2025 15:07:45 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />. But the current Intel generation is a dud,</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099514245</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2025 15:07:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099514245</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099514245@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Old hardware is just not worth messing with anymore after a certain point.

  
 Upgrading from a Ryzen 3900X to an i7-14700KF not because I really wanted
to, but because all the offboard USB ports on the motherboard (except for
most of the back-panel ones) are now completely fried. 
  
 Normally I try to at least wait for the next process node before upgrading--these
two are both "7nm". But the current Intel generation is a dud, so if building
a new system, this seems to be where the smart(ish) money is. If I was going
to have to replace the motherboard and PSU, I figure just build somethiing
new, even if the CPU and RAM were salvageable... 
  
 Parts will arrive today, so hopefully I can get back to having a fully-working
system soon. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099512936</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 20:48:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099512936</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099512936@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Pebble is back. yay!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099512303</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2025 20:25:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Amazon counterfeits</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099512303@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Well yes, everything on Amazon is fake.  The merchandise is fake, the reviews
are fake, and they know it.  I never thought I'd be rooting for Walmart, but
I prefer to shop their web site when I can. 
  
 The sad part is that you can't even go to Amazon and say "I'll pay more for
genuine Brand ABC merchandise" because for example the "Genuine Samsung 1000
MAh Battery" is counterfeit and is actually the same as the "GHINRTOK Original
OEM 1000 MAh Battery" (and both are actually 200 MAh chinesium batteries).
 There is literally no way to identify genuine goods. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099512077</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2025 19:04:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Amazon counterfeits</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099512077@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > (I think everyone here already knows that around 100% of the       
 >merchandise on Amazon is counterfeit.)       
 >       
 >      
      
 You should look up that video from Rossman in which he put some common  
  
 electronics to the test in a lab to check how reliable those electronics
    
 were. You gotta love 1 Amp fuses that don't blow up until they have 6 amps
    
 going through. All of those had top ratings on Amazon.     
    
 Amazon is fucking dangerous, not to mention a scam. I considered back in
the   
 day to sell some stuff through them, but the issue there is they ask so much
  
 documentation from you. You don't get to sell through Amazon as a small 
 
 merchant until they know who your providers are and what your profit margins
  
 are... at which point they can just sidestep you and sell your stuff   
 themselves.   
  
 Small merchants selling through Amazn end up competing with their own distribution
platform, which is a fight which can't be won. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099511974</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 22:20:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099511974</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099511974@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Because 95% of their customers will abide and give them the $. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Mar 09 2025 23:19:53 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">I can't understand why that would even benefit them. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099511859</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2025 23:19:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099511859</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099511859@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I can't understand why that would even benefit them.  Anything that can be
whitelisted/blacklisted can be cloned.  We do it all the time with SFP modules.
 We even have a machine that can re-flash a module.  We tell it what vendor
and model to be and it puts their ID onto it.  We do it to avoid having to
pay ten times more for the exact same module from the vendor, but if you have
that plus a machine that can print stickers then you're basically every Amazon
seller. 
  
 (I think everyone here already knows that around 100% of the merchandise
on Amazon is counterfeit.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099510361</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2025 19:26:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099510361</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099510361@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I ever mention that for a long time ( perhaps still? ) Lenovo whitelisted m.2 wifi cards?   Especially in their minis. Rather annoying that you cant simply upgrade to a newer card.  And the machine wont just ignore it or something, it will refuse to boot, flashing "illegal device found" and beeping like its on fire...  I have heard some people have hacked the bios.. but that is risky unless you are in need of some doorstops..</p>
<p>Normally i just ignore that limitation and move on, as the ones i bought were to have their CPU swapped out with Xeons and just be PVE server nodes. But now that i have torn down the farm, I wanted to turn most of them into desktops to give out to family as while they wont be running win11 due to the arbitrary version requirements so intel and AMD can sell chips, they are not bad little machines as long as you dont need tons of ram.  WiFi is pretty important in a desktop tho.  ( and yes, i know i can do tiny11 which has that CPU level limitation removed, but its a chance to get them off windows.. )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099508669</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2025 22:32:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099508669</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099508669@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>technically its not the riscv cores that matter, its the NPU/TPU cores and overlapping of RAM. </p>
<p>With out the extra, its 'yet another cpu'. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Feb 10 2025 17:01:49 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">I wouldn't call it derailed. It's an open architecture and it's going to thrive no matter who builds it. If the idea of replacing GPU cores with RISC-V cores for large models has merit, the production of chips to supply that need is inevitable. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099507860</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Feb 2025 17:01:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099507860</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099507860@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I wouldn't call it derailed.  It's an open architecture and it's going to
thrive no matter who builds it.  If the idea of replacing GPU cores with RISC-V
cores for large models has merit, the production of chips to supply that need
is inevitable. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099506377</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 18:34:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099506377</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099506377@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I know i hate NVIDIA and want off the GPU treadmill, but since RISC-V is about to be derailed to keep things out the reach of us serfs, someone get me a couple of 64G Jetson Orins for my birthday..</p>
<p>Finally got my old Xavier NX working properly with LLMs and while not a speed demon, its more than usable. AND does not suck up a KW like my AI server does.  But ts only 8 gb so rather limited.  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099505158</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 14:10:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099505158</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505158@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh and to be fair, which i try to be, Trump's appearance wont make it any better. In fact, most likely will make it worse in this area.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Jan 16 2025 12:11:50 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Well darn. </p>
<p>The official statement came out on that RISC-V AI board we have been waiting on for a good year..     Its dead. Sanctions killed it.    Another F-Biden moment.</p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099505157</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2025 14:09:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099505157</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099505157@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>They may have just cracked the quantum computer error issue..   An 8 state quantum machine at scale is almost unimaginable what it could do.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"The new method encodes quantum information onto an antimony atom, which has eight possible states that enable data to be more safely stored than in a standard two-state qubit, or quantum bit."</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099504673</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jan 2025 12:11:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099504673</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099504673@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well darn. </p>
<p>The official statement came out on that RISC-V AI board we have been waiting on for a good year..     Its dead. Sanctions killed it.    Another F-Biden moment.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099504498</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 23:32:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: PowerPC.. ooo</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099504498@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>From what im hearing, the mainframe division of their business is minimal anyway. Not zero, but it could vanish tomorrow and they would not go under.  Already got rid of the 'PC' division and they didn't collapse.</p>
<p>Its all about consulting, data centers, AI, etc.   Perhaps not the 'market owner' they used to be, but not hurting either.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Dec 17 2024 14:19:17 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: PowerPC.. ooo</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">I wouldn't want to be IBM</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099504497</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 23:18:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099504497</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099504497@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>cool.  not looked at details but supposedly DJI just dropped the hard coded 'geolocking' in their firmware.  Now you fly where you want to, not where the FAA tells you that you can.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Not that mine had any of that nonsense, but that is a different story.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099501685</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:19:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: PowerPC.. ooo</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099501685@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > IBM isn't formally releasing Power11 processors until next year, but 
 >their software engineers continue being quite busy preparing the Linux
 >kernel and other open-source software for Power11.
 
 I wonder how long it will be before IBM starts merging the POWER line with
the chips that run their mainframes.  They already combined the AS/400 and
RS/6000 lineages into POWER (and its little brother, PowerPC) ... and more
consolidation is called for when people aren't exactly lined up around the
corner to buy IBM midrange systems.
 
 And when no one is running any *new* workloads on those systems ... what's
the advantage, really.  AMD64 has closed much of the performance gap at this
point, and has pulled way ahead on price/performance.  Cloud service providers
large and small are all offering ARM as their "not Intel derived" option.
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099498817</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 22:55:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099498817</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099498817@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So intel just got rescued, in effect. 8 billion of our tax dollars because, well, money laundering..</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099498750</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Nov 2024 13:59:19 -0000</pubDate><title>PowerPC.. ooo</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099498750@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>From LXer's feed.  I didn't realize they were still making them...  Cool.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<div class="message_header" style="padding: 0px; background-color: #deded0; color: #000080;">Mon Nov 25 2024 21:04:32 UTC from rss &lt;&gt;<span class="message_subject">Subject: IBM Power11 CPUs Launching In 2025 - Linux 6.13 Preps KVM Nested Guests For Power11</span></div>
<div class="message_content" style="background-color: transparent; padding: 0px; color: #000080;">IBM isn't formally releasing Power11 processors until next year, but their software engineers continue being quite busy preparing the Linux kernel and other open-source software for Power11.<br /><br /><a href="https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.11-Power11-KVM-Nested" target="webcit01">https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.11-Power11-KVM-Nested</a></div>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099498402</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2024 19:09:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: The Flying Penguin</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099498402@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Until the security team locks down the BIOS and you cant boot  
 >anything that they wont allow :)   
  
 Already did.  I know the password. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099498393</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2024 16:51:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: The Flying Penguin</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099498393@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Until the security team locks down the BIOS and you cant boot anything that they wont allow :)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I think we do that where i am at. I still have that old un-managed mac, so not sure if its happened yet. But if not, its still on the planned list. Tho one side effect is that mac hardware can NOT get on the network, VPN, or directly use any of our non external-web-based services. Has to be via a shop managed VM in my case, at least for now. Soon i bet that stops working too. ( or i put osx back on, and let them control it. Which i doubt would work, since it cant be upgraded to whatever is current. its an X86..  last one  )</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 23 2024 02:58:55 UTC</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: The Flying Penguin</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Not too long ago, I put a Linux partition on my work computer, because it's the lightest machine I own (my personal laptop has a big screen and lovely keyboard but it's big and heavy and has no battery) and I want to be able to boot up into a non-work environment while traveling.  They've got all sorts of snoopware on the corporate image, and anyway it's running 'doze and therefore barely usable.</p>
<p>Recently I decided that it's too risky, that eventually they'd scan the machine and see an unauthorized partition, and my risk tolerance has sharply declined lately, so I deleted it.</p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099498346</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Nov 2024 02:58:55 -0000</pubDate><title>The Flying Penguin</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099498346@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not too long ago, I put a Linux partition on my work computer, because it's the lightest machine I own (my personal laptop has a big screen and lovely keyboard but it's big and heavy and has no battery) and I want to be able to boot up into a non-work environment while traveling.  They've got all sorts of snoopware on the corporate image, and anyway it's running 'doze and therefore barely usable.</p>
<p>Recently I decided that it's too risky, that eventually they'd scan the machine and see an unauthorized partition, and my risk tolerance has sharply declined lately, so I deleted it.</p>
<p><img src="
<p>I got the recommendation for this "high speed" USB stick from <a href="https://pendrivelinux.com/fastest-usb-flash-drives/">pendrivelinux.com</a>.  It uses UASP (which is SCSI-over-USB instead of the traditional USB bulk storage profile) and has a "real" SSD inside it.  I installed a full Linux image to it, with an EFI system partition and everything.  Now I can boot my work laptop into this and it works really well.  It can run the "super speed" USB at 10 Gbps so if your machine has a fast enough port it's just as fast as having the disk inside the machine.</p>
<p>I've tried the whole USB Boot Drive thing before, but was never satisfied with the performance.  This, on the other hand, works great.</p>
<p>And apparently I got it for half price because I bought it for about $40 and now it's listed for $80.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099497577</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Nov 2024 23:06:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099497577</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099497577@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Might have mentioned it before elsewhere. </p>
<p>HP.. Their 'mini' series.  I got one. Was working fine.  then started rebooting out of the blue. ( not OS reboot, hard power restart )</p>
<p>Thought it was my UPS dying .. nope.  brought it inside to beat on..   stress test until it was nearly on fire, not a blip.  Next day 3 reboots in a row.  Then nothing for a few days..  Even tho testing was fine, tried new ram, new SSD, same random results.   So bought a 3rd party power supply. A mistake.  these **** use DRM keyed power supply so even tho they have the same plug and enough juice, if they dont 'talk nice' so they are ignored. </p>
<p>Against better judgment.. got an OEM one. Ran fine for 2 days. poof.. reboot.  Sigh. into the trash heap it goes i guess. </p>
<p>Oh, and you cant freaking update bios unless you install windows. wtf? Last HP i ever get. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099497291</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:01:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099497291</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099497291@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Intel :  "We have this fancy FPGAi  ( FPGA for AI ) that is x% faster, uses far less power, and less cost per cycle % than the 'incumbent GPU company' ( lol ) bla bla.  And a dev board is only $10k ( ouch, but not out of line for what it is ). Oh, and if you want IP to run on it so it actually does something, that is licensed separately."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Bleh. Licensing development software to use on a chip-set you manufacture should be illegal.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099495770</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Nov 2024 00:00:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Non-qualitative improvements</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099495770@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-11-01 14:53 from Nurb432     
 >I think except for edge cases, this is true across the board for    
 >anything that is even remotely recent. "ooo the AD says my new    
 >shiny PC goes faster and its got xyz super power!.. now let me    
 >go watch a cat video"   ( and why you see MS obsoleting    
 >millions of machines for zero technical justification.. its just    
 >to keep the chip people in business )   Much like phones, we    
 >have hit a wall where faster/better really does not matter, its    
 >just numbers at this point and no 'practical' improvement.      
 >    
    
 I have been saying this for quite a while.   
  
 But then I managed to get some gaming gear to upgrade my aging obsolete home
computer and the difference is just brutal. This is, however,  because my
aging obsolete gear is the sort people does not believe to be still in use
anywhere XD 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099495543</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Nov 2024 01:37:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099495543</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099495543@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Guy at work mentioned something the other day. I don't NEED it but fell victim to the "shiny object" factor</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"Idodd virtual drive'</p>
<p>Its a 2.5" ssd or m.2 NVME ( depending on model ) portable USBC shell. Shove a drive in and you get external HD ( nothing new here ) but if you copy ISOs over, it will mount them as a virtual drive, you can even boot off the 'virtual drive'.   It also supports VHDs as well as virtual USB flash.  Has a keyboard and display to select what images you want to mount.   </p>
<p>Seems to do the job it says it will do.  I donno about long term. Have to test it with some ARM boot images as virtual USB, see if that holds up.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>One downside is to generate a VHD or USB it seems you have to use their windows tool. I tried it using qemu tools but it bitched about needing to be defragged, even tho it was not even formatted. *shrug*.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099495430</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 16:15:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099495430</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099495430@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Yeah. At the office I ran some benchmarks of our compilation process and
disbling cores on my Ryzen: no benefit from anything more than approximately
6 cores, because dependencies make it difficult to exploit more parallelism
than that. That's pretty typical of a lot of workloads, so for most of us,
something like a Core i5 is the price/performance sweet spot. Maybe an i7
if you want to tick off the "Recommended CPU" tickbox for Cyberpunk 2077,
but even for most gamers i5 is more than enough. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099495424</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 14:53:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099495424</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099495424@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I think except for edge cases, this is true across the board for anything that is even remotely recent. "ooo the AD says my new shiny PC goes faster and its got xyz super power!.. now let me go watch a cat video"   ( and why you see MS obsoleting millions of machines for zero technical justification.. its just to keep the chip people in business )   Much like phones, we have hit a wall where faster/better really does not matter, its just numbers at this point and no 'practical' improvement. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And yes, Intel is dying a slow, painful death. Which i support.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Nov 01 2024 10:17:08 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />my current system feels "fast enough" despite being several years old. <br /><br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099495417</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Nov 2024 14:17:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099495417</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099495417@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Reading up on all the Core Ultra 200 series reviews... what a disappointment.
Seems to be outclassed by AMD products at the current price point (the highest
end product is out of stock at Newegg due to high demand, so compare the actually-available
$380-$399 products.) 
  
 I am currently running a 3900X on the AM4 socket with a JEDEC DDR4-3200 kit
manually overclocked slightly. My usual thinking is not to upgrade to the
next memory generation until it has doubled speed at the JEDEC (nominal voltage)
setup, which has finally happened with Core Ultra's support for DDR5-6400
CUDIMMs. But this is a lackluster product, and my current system feels "fast
enough" despite being several years old. I might just wait for Zen 6 and see
if Intel ever catches up. 
  
 Sad to see Intel falling fairly consistently behind, lately. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099494817</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:05:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099494817</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494817@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
  
 Derp, somehow fat-fingered that.  
  
 Unfortunately tariffs don't work so well and our economic policy is broken
on a bipartisan basis (both parties are getting stuff wrong in similar ways.)

  
 Keeping domestic industries on government life-support means keeping domestic
industries *directly* on government life-support if you want it to work. I
don't think Intel is that far gone yet, however. But it's sad that their newest
desktop chips are manufactured by TSMC. 
  
 Under United States law, we are obligated to defend Taiwan if they are attacked
by the mainland, but that doesn't mean we're going to win. You know what they
say about land wars in Asia. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099494816</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Oct 2024 19:03:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099494816</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494816@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099494467</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:10:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099494467</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494467@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > If only for national security reasons we have got to keep   
 >state-of-the-art fabs running in the US.   
  
 Yeah.  I feel that way about a lot of things. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099494337</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Oct 2024 17:52:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099494337</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099494337@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-09-23 11:32 from IGnatius T Foobar   
 >Intel could be more valuable in pieces than in its current form.  Keep 
 
 >in mind that they've just started dipping their toes in the water of   
 >providing fabrication services to third parties.  Qualcomm was the   
 >first customer for Intel's 20A process, and Samsung might be on the way
 
 >too.  That's fine, let them give TSMC a run for their money, especially
 
 >if some of the fabs are in the United States.   
  
 If only for national security reasons we have got to keep state-of-the-art
fabs running in the US. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099493808</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2024 13:46:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099493808</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099493808@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>once again ( for a different reason this time, not a drive failure ) copying ~ 4TB from a external usb2 drive. ( usb -&gt; sata, is a usb2.. its just for emergencies and helping out others in need )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>But net result. zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz  for a long time..</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099493757</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2024 20:54:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099493757</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099493757@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Congrats on the new gear.  It doesn't have to be fresh off the line to be
fun. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099492372</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 11:20:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099492372</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099492372@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I think that is the same as my old macbook. ( the first 'pro' but wasnt labeled 'pro' )</p>
<p>Pretty worthless to use on a daily basis at this point, but it has a DVD writer, so i keep it in the closet for that for when i need to rip or write a DVD or something. ( which is rare )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Oct 07 2024 22:33:40 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=SouthernComputerGeek">SouthernComputerGeek</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I recently ordered a new (to me) computer, an HP Z-something with a six core Xeon and 64 gigabytes of RAM. It is not new but it will be worlds better than my 2009 Mac Mini.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099492332</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2024 02:33:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099492332</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099492332@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I recently ordered a new (to me) computer, an HP Z-something with a six core Xeon and 64 gigabytes of RAM. It is not new but it will be worlds better than my 2009 Mac Mini.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099492123</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Oct 2024 14:53:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099492123</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099492123@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Might have mentioned it another room i dont remember. But went ahead and bought that RK3588, that has a carrier board that takes 4, yes 4, M.2 slots.   And 32G ram on the module. ( and 256g eMMC on board )</p>
<p>Nice metal case arrives today.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Its long term future around here is to be a ceph based NAS. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099490770</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2024 15:40:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099490770</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099490770@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>A bit more on Intel this week. </p>
<p>2.8 B losses in a single *quarter*.. ouch.</p>
<p>And id like to see Altera be spun back off and be independent.  Would like to see AMD release xilinx back into the world to and not kept behind a walled garden.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~</p>
<p style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: ptserif, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75); font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.5;">Intel is better positioned to sell units like Altera and Mobileye than it is to seek a 100% acquisition, according to analysts whom EE Times contacted.</p>
<p style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: ptserif, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75); font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.5;">Last week, Qualcomm proposed a potential buyout to Intel, according to reports in the Wall Street Journal and the Financial Times. A 100% buyout of Intel would not be a good investment because Intel Foundry will continue to have difficulty competing with larger manufacturing rivals like TSMC and Samsung, the analysts said.</p>
<p style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: ptserif, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75); font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.5;">“We don’t think anyone else would really want to run [Intel Foundry] and believe scrapping them is unlikely to be politically viable at this point,” Stacy Rasgon, a senior analyst at Bernstein Research, said in a Sept. 23 report he provided to EE Times. “If it was just about gaining manufacturing, Qualcomm would of course be free to use them without the headache of owning them.”</p>
<p style="box-sizing: inherit; font-family: ptserif, Times, 'Times New Roman', serif; color: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.75); font-size: 18px; line-height: 1.5;">Intel Foundry’s <a style="box-sizing: inherit; cursor: pointer; text-decoration-skip-ink: auto; text-decoration-line: none; overflow-wrap: break-word; word-break: break-word; background-color: transparent; border-bottom: 3px solid #b4e7f8; transition: background 0.15s cubic-bezier(0.4, 0, 0.6, 1);" href="https://www.eetimes.com/intel-years-from-success-in-foundry-business-analysts-say/" rel="noopener" target="_blank">operating loss of $2.8 billion in the second quarter</a> this year widened from the previous quarter. The company expects operating losses at Intel Foundry to continue at approximately the same rate in the third quarter.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099490326</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:48:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099490326</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099490326@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have not heard from him for a while now.  I think i registered on his BBS, but never really visited.    </p>
<p>Also, sort of related, did we lose our BBS list we had here, or am i just blind? Not looked for it in a long time, didn't even think of it until just now.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099490325</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 15:32:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099490325</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099490325@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Intel could be more valuable in pieces than in its current form.  Keep in
mind that they've just started dipping their toes in the water of providing
fabrication services to third parties.  Qualcomm was the first customer for
Intel's 20A process, and Samsung might be on the way too.  That's fine, let
them give TSMC a run for their money, especially if some of the fabs are in
the United States. 
  
 PD used to tell us, based on his experience and contacts inside Intel, that
he suspected they'd eventually ditch most of their commercial business and
focus on being a government contractor.  That seems even more doable if they
split themselves up, not so much if they sold the whole thing to Qualcomm
as a going concern. 
  
 Does anyone know where PD is anyway?  His BBS doesn't seem to be around anymore,
and he used to say that the reason he made himself scarce over here was because
he wanted his personality to add value to his own place.  Now it seems we
can't find him anywhere. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099490317</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:01:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099490317</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099490317@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And in other depressing hardware news:</p>
<p>Intel and Qualcomm are in discussions for a buy out.  Not  a fan of intel of course and want to see them obliterated, and it could be worse and be Broadcomm instead, but still not a fan of this. Assuming it does not get shut down by the FTC.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099488142</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Sep 2024 12:10:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099488142</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099488142@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Bleh, looking like that RISC-v powerhouse i have been waiting a year for..  wont be this year.   Heard they laid off staff, and while not 'gone' as they are still there, and selling current models, not a lot of news from them on status. And the chip isn't even in production yet, let alone the board to stick it on.</p>
<p>Originally it was slated for early-bird purchase this month.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099485722</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2024 02:25:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099485722</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099485722@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >If a POS N100 is 180% faster i would hate to see what it used to  
 >be like ...     
  
 The N100 is descended from the Celeron.  Improving over that old snail was
not going to be difficult. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099485645</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 Aug 2024 17:08:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099485645</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099485645@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That is a bit of cash...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"Advanced Micro Devices will acquire server manufacturer ZT Systems for $4.9 billion as the chipmaker looks to expand its artificial intelligence capabilities."</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099485492</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2024 23:03:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099485492</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099485492@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So the drive that died and i sent back, they just shipped the replacement.  No questions asked ( not that i did anything to cause it.. but you know how some companies are ). Will have to give them credit for standing behind their products.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099484806</link><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2024 17:57:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099484806</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099484806@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Context not important, but got a flyer for a 'new and improved portable model'  Among other "advancements" ( like a microsd port  *yawn* ) it includes:  "179% faster processing: powered by the IntelⓇ Processor N100"</p>
<p>If a POS N100 is 180% faster i would hate to see what it used to be like ...   </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099484304</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Aug 2024 17:04:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099484304</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099484304@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Are you running an i9 or something less? Apparently these problems   
 >affect the whole lineup, but they are worst with Thermal Velocity Boost
 
 >(i9-only feature)   
  
 Gee, now I'm glad I disabled boost on my i9  :) 
  
 (Even though I did it to reduce excess power consumption ... "not crashing"
is a nice feature.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099483526</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Aug 2024 16:20:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099483526</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099483526@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well, looks i get a replacement drive from the manufacturer   3 year warranty.  It was only a couple of days: "we are sorry it took so long to get back with you we have been swamped, here are the steps to get an RMA and send it back"</p>
<p>Point in their favor.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099483393</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2024 14:15:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099483393</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099483393@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>grrr wrong room for the above thread.  sorry.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099483391</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2024 13:41:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099483391</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099483391@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Weird stuff afoot.  Restore completed 13 hours.  Not that the VMs change much, other than the NAS beast so i dont *need* to, but went ahead and doing some updated backups/etc anyway.  Backups from host server 1, most were running at 250m/s or so.  ( not yet backed up a new copy of the beast. still getting all the media updated first. backup was perhaps 4 months old so missing things )</p>
<p>Host server 2 ( mostly for testing/etc, or when i want dedicated horsepower ) was going to run a backup of a Debian desktop i use for incoming RDP. Same story, dont 'need' it, but figured might was well since the backup server is plugged in.  Doh, i numbered it wrong.  Did a full clone so i could reset the ID. 300m/s  ( ok, not great but not terrible, but to be fair its all on a 2TB m.2 in that box, SSD is just for 'stuff'. ).  Back it up. Started out at 230m/s, and quickly dropped to 80m/s. Sometimes even dropping down to 15m/s. Then back up, then down.. then sideways.. Ran much better and more consistent last time i did it.  ( and same here no vms running to reduce contention )</p>
<p>wtf.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and i guess i should be happy it works. and that i have the stuff to bitch about in the first place. i  have more than many.  Perhaps ill just shut up. )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099482962</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2024 13:13:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099482962</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099482962@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>booooo my data ( not system ) drive died in my main PVE server.  The one that houses the NAS VM data... </p>
<p>4TB SSD . Poof.  Even caused a hardware reboot. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>ya ya i know.. backups, ceph, bla bla     but other than occasional backups, anything else is overkill </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099482136</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:40:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099482136</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099482136@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>lol</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Jul 26 2024 16:35:19 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />Why do you suppose they are denying that laptops are affected? ;-) </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099482135</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:35:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099482135</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099482135@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Why do you suppose they are denying that laptops are affected? ;-) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099482132</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2024 20:15:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099482132</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099482132@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Did not read the entire article as im busy, but apparently the 'fix' intel is putting out only apples if you have not had issues. If you have, your CPU is physically damaged. ( it was on the verge if anyone wants to look )</p>
<p>"If you have experienced crashing your CPU is irrecoverably damaged and should be replaced"</p>
<p>And they are still blaming voltages, and their microcode doing it. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Also who is paying for these replacements? And what about laptops and NUCs, where you cant normally replace it?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099481985</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:55:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099481985</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099481985@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ya i tried stuff like reducing clock speeds and such early on.  No effect.     Also thought network for a while too, but no, that wasn't it.</p>
<p>I forget the exact errors i got on console when it didn't freeze solid but all running processes did, and it always seems to be related to one or 2 of the cores, so i thought 'why not give that a try and turn those off"  It was the 'power saving' ones, ( whatever its called ) so i was just assuming its power related after reading the stuff about 13 and 14 gen.    I also don't think it was bad hardware, as i was not the only person, and they had drastically different hardware, but same CPU... </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099481980</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:36:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099481980</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099481980@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Hmmmm. I have had faulty hardware before. In the 90s, my brother bought an
AMD K5 (or something like that) which had stability issues in Linux at nominal
voltage and frequency settings. (As soon as you ran the `df` command, it would
crash. Every time.) Thesse problems went away when you jumpered it down to
a lower frequency. But I think they eventually came back, even at the lower
freq - the hardware was degrading before our eyes. 
  
 Maybe some more recent examples, too, but that's the one that stands out
in my mind. 
  
 Supposedly, the 12th gen doesn't suffer from the SAME issues as 13th/14th.
And apparently, they've finally root-caused the latter: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Intel-breaks-silence-on-13th-and-14th-gen-Raptor-Lake-desktop-CPU-instability-issues.866224.0.html

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099481976</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 18:09:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099481976</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099481976@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>An i7. 12gen. Shoved in a NUC like box and at the time was a bit faster than most without spending silly money. ( and why i chose it )  Its a couple of generations old now as I put it away for almost a year as i was too frustrated and came close to tossing it. I had read about other people with similar issues with that gen, mainly related to core graphic drivers and such. None of the stuff they suggested worked ( for many people it seems, not just me ) so away it went.   When i brought it back out during some house cleaning, "lets try this again, but at BIOS level, before i finally toss it" mostly i disabled the 'efficiency cores' which of course would drop power use, so im 99% its related to the current issue even tho at the time i didn't know about that.  The other things i messed with, i doubt they really made a  difference. ( mostly pre-fetch and extension stuff, i was just trying random things, and most i turned back on anyway )</p>
<p>Disabling the cores sort defeated the use-case i had bought for it, now its 'yet another mid-range i7' but at least its not collecting dust and i can use it.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Jul 25 2024 13:49:09 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />Are you running an i9 or something less? Apparently these problems affect the whole lineup, but they are worst with Thermal Velocity Boost (i9-only feature) </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099481973</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:50:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099481973</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099481973@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I've been thinking about upgrading to Arrow Lake when it's available, but
with these issues unresolved I'm not so sure. Zen 2 it is, for now. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099481972</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2024 17:49:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099481972</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099481972@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Are you running an i9 or something less? Apparently these problems affect
the whole lineup, but they are worst with Thermal Velocity Boost (i9-only
feature) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099481168</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2024 11:43:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099481168</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099481168@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Sort of funny. Intel 13 and 14 gen core series CPUs crash on load.  So does gen 12.  ( i can attest to that personally...  i got mine stable finally, after disabling a lot of things, including all the 'power saving cores' so i lost 1/2 of what its supposed to be able to do )</p>
<p>Intel sux they need to get out of the way.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.techspot.com/news/103876-intel-laptop-cpus-crashing-company-remains-silent.html</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099481070</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jul 2024 15:50:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099481070</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099481070@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>NVIDIA's days are numbered.  Generic TPUs are coming for them, and now this -&gt; https://siliconangle.com/2024/07/18/openai-reportedly-holding-talks-broadcom-others-develop-new-ai-server-chip/</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( broadcom and openAI are in talks.. )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099480501</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 18:06:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099480501</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099480501@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I might have the numbers wrong, but the 2 i'm comparing and complaining about, i really dont see any size reduction. just a different ( incompatible ) shape. and lower wattage. </p>
<p>Sure, if you saved a bunch of space, or it was magically waterproof or something, id say its 'ok' but i just dont see it here.  I think when i buy transformer dongles from here out out ill be sure check first to avoid it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And yes i know its low on the list of things to be pissed about, but getting really tired of stuff like this "just because we can make you buy new stuff" . </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099480482</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jul 2024 16:44:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099480482</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099480482@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Right.  It's the same series of connectors, and they were all ratified at
the same time.  C5/C6 is for devices that draw substantially less current
than the 15 amps offered with C13/C14. 
  
 Something that requires less current is also likely to be physically smaller,
and a C14 connector might take more space than they want to reserve for a
power inlet. 
  
 *shrug*  I just can't get upset about this.  I'm seeing the opposite happen
in my data centers -- a lot of equipment now consumes more than 15 amps so
they're putting C20 inlets on the power supplies instead of C14.  Now we have
to swap out the PDU (power distribution units, aka power strips) for ones
that have more C19 outlets on them.  And providing that many C19 outlets almost
always involves feeding it with 3-phase power.  It's kind of a big deal. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099480399</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 23:39:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099480399</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099480399@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I meant to say 3 Pronged AC.  The 2 prong dont count for this mini0rant. But not had many of them. Just a handful. </p>
<p>As always, I'm ok with change if you gain something, i just dont see any gain here.  In fact, with lower current ability, i see it as a loss.  Its not smaller, and less power..  </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jul 15 2024 18:58:58 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>From your connector link i believe: <strong style="color: #444444; font-family: Heebo; font-size: 14px; text-align: center;">C13/C14</strong></p>
<p>it was on every AC powered device ( well, ones that were not hardwired ) i have had since the 80s..  until these dumbass flowery things started appearing. That dont even take the same amount of current. </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099480396</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:58:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099480396</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099480396@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>From your connector link i believe: <strong style="color: #444444; font-family: Heebo; font-size: 14px; text-align: center;">C13/C14</strong></p>
<p>it was on every AC powered device ( well, ones that were not hardwired ) i have had since the 80s..  until these dumbass flowery things started appearing. That dont even take the same amount of current. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099480393</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jul 2024 22:43:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099480393</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099480393@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[What older style?  That's the one they agreed on to supplant all the non-standard
connectors and everyone is moving to it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099479803</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 14:21:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099479803</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099479803@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Dumb as i dont see any actual valid reason for it, other than to 'make more incompatible stuff'</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Im ok with things when it makes sense.  but i dont see any advantage over the older style </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099479798</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:37:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099479798</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099479798@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>its dumb :) </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Jul 11 2024 09:28:36 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>That's a C5 connector.  It's actually from the same series of connectors (IEC 60320) that has the C13 you're familiar with for plugging in computer equipment.</p>
<p>Here's a chart: [ <a href="https://www.stayonline.com/product-resources/reference-iec320.asp" target="webcit01">https://www.stayonline.com/product-resources/reference-iec320.asp</a> ]</p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099479796</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2024 13:28:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099479796</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099479796@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That's a C5 connector.  It's actually from the same series of connectors (IEC 60320) that has the C13 you're familiar with for plugging in computer equipment.</p>
<p>Here's a chart: [ <a href="https://www.stayonline.com/product-resources/reference-iec320.asp">https://www.stayonline.com/product-resources/reference-iec320.asp</a> ]</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099479585</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 22:45:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099479585</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099479585@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh all my battery charging transformers ( for those probable solar things so you can use line power ) are also the old style..      </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099479584</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 22:42:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099479584</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099479584@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>You have the prong plug that goes in the wall like always on one end.  3 "pin" ( well 2 slot and one round, here in US at least other countries YMMV )</p>
<p>Normally the other end, which goes into the power supply/transformer/etc is a solid block with 3 slots. These newer things, instead of that its got round nodules and round pin holes .  They seem to be most common on external transformer type supplies  ( laptops and such, but i did see a PC with it too ) Most of mine, even laptops and these NUCs i have a plethora of, still have the old style, and i see NO advantage to changing.  It just doesn't make sense to me of why we are doing this unless there is some huge advantage im missing..</p>
<p>"Clover connectors" is what i see them being called, sort of silly, but i guess i do see where they get the idea from.</p>
<p>and i hate to do images, but:</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jul 09 2024 18:19:39 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">No idea what you're talking about. Which end is a clover? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099479577</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 22:19:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099479577</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099479577@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[No idea what you're talking about. Which end is a clover? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099479530</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2024 14:42:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099479530</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099479530@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I guess this could be a rant too, but a question:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>WTF is the point of these stupid clover style power plugs? Why cant everyone just use the old blob style?    What does it offer that is better?        Long story but had one go dead on me. No physical stress, never imagined the AC side went out.   But it did. and of course since they are different, i don't have a bunch of spares laying around.( explains my pixel book troubles from a month or so ago. .i just could not bring myself to toss it yet.. and thought id try screwing with it again. )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099479274</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 22:47:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099479274</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099479274@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Tossing old stuff today, including some of the few books/magazines i kept from the great purge.</p>
<p>Old "computer design' Magazine ( i think IEEE, i used to be a member around that time frame ). March 1, 1987.  Headline on cover: Future Computers to use optics and neural nets.</p>
<p>Well, not there yet for optical computing, but they were not wrong about the neural nets, and coming optics. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099479207</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jul 2024 15:15:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099479207</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099479207@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well that is cool.  OrangePI has come out with a CM4 compatible board with a real chip ( RK3588 ) and upwards of 16G ram, 256G eMMC.  Couple that with the 6 port 'cluster board' that is miniATX sized ( and it also adds 6 M.2 slots for storage ).. </p>
<p>Would not be cheap ( my guess is around 1k ), but would be cool.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099476702</link><pubDate>Fri, 21 Jun 2024 13:14:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099476702</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099476702@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >retrogaming community that is paying well for equipment from the late  

 >90s and early 2000s, since that is around the point in whch it becomes 
 
  
 If that is the case then the modern hardware makers ought to finally eliminate
BIOS and 16-bit modes from their hardware.  It is the current year! 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099476473</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 20:58:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099476473</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099476473@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That 2.2k was for Asus, which is normally lower priced than most.  But just got an ad from Lenovo. Their base X model is 1.2k. Still more than id pay for a mostly useless toy ( if i wanted to burn cash, I'd spend it on more GPU for my AI server first ) but that is much more reasonable i think for an entry level model.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099476426</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:04:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099476426</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099476426@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well darn,the law suits aside, looks like machines with snapdragon X are still now hitting the streets, but a bit high on the $ side.</p>
<p>2200 bucks. While i guess its not THAT bad if you are looking for a new non-intel machine, and it is faster than the M3, i think ill pass. Not like i would have to skip meals or something to get one, its hard to rationalize that much for a toy that would rarely get used. ( even if i was still going into office, it would be 'used' .. but still just be a toy there, to use at lunch to look at email and watch video, which my 300 dollar Chromebook does just fine. </p>
<p>sort of a shame, hardware we only could dream about not too long ago..  dont need it now. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099475925</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2024 20:16:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099475925</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099475925@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>whoohoo my 3d printer still works. Not had it on since fall when i had to tear it down and rebuild the hot end.  ( filament leak. what a freaking mess )</p>
<p>Still not sure why my AI bot asked for access this afternoon, or what its printing... </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099474592</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 11:36:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099474592</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099474592@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Apparently its not just me. Others have similar issues.  Something i may look into more someday and give the dev guys facts/ideas.  But will want to test on true server level hardware, eliminate any possible workstation level bus  bottlenecks.</p>
<p>If i ever go back to consulting, ill do some other form of backup ( perhaps images for the regular VMs and rsync for the NAS ). As convenient as it is, cant have a production box down for many hours on a restore that should not take long. ( ya, i know, 4TB isn't going to be quick, but still )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099474553</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jun 2024 01:03:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099474553</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099474553@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-06-01 14:37 from Nurb432 <nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org>   
 >Backing up 4TB VM across the network, for a disk swap in a  
 >server...... Zzzzzzz      Donno why its so slow.  CPU on either  
  
 I like to attach to those with strace -tp, sometimes it exposes stupid stuff
like needless sleeps or stalls waiting on something you don't expect. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099474089</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 14:37:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099474089</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099474089@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Backing up 4TB VM across the network, for a disk swap in a server...... Zzzzzzz      Donno why its so slow.  CPU on either box isn't taxed at all ( sub 10% ),  network is loafing @ 120mb on a 1g switch.. Every other VM is turned off to reduce bus traffic.  Drives are not high end but not super cheap either. Source is an SSD.. Destination drive on the backup server ( proxmox ) isn't the fastest around, it is a spinny disk to save cost but not slow either.   I forget the rates now, but i have tested the drives on the same hardware and it was several times write/read speed max and about ' average ' in the bigger picture.</p>
<p>Last time i did this it was onto an external USB as that was the largest disk i had handy ( 8tb ), so i did expect some slowness, even tho it was still USB3. But its about the same speed .. </p>
<p>read: 123.3 MiB/s, write: 116.8 MiB/s   ( average update each block )</p>
<p>There is some compression going on, but with cpu so low, that isn't the bottleneck either.. </p>
<p>Not end of world, its not like some mission critical NSA datacenter here..  mostly just my NAS and streaming front end so i can watch videos and music on the big screen...  just seems odd to me.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099474086</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 14:06:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099474086</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099474086@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>A few of my retro boxes seem to have increased dramatically since i tossed them during the great purge.   Oops.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099473710</link><pubDate>Wed, 29 May 2024 21:13:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099473710</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099473710@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Today somebody mentioned to me that some of my machines are worth an actual
chunk of money because they got so old they are becomming collection pieces.
Windows98 level.   
  
 I haven't checked the actual prices, but it looks like there is a retrogaming
community that is paying well for equipment from the late 90s and early 2000s,
since that is around the point in whch it becomes hard to emulate games. Games
in that era are too modern to be emulated in consumer hardware but are too
old to run natively without hacks. It is called the emulation singularity,
or the emulation donut hole. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099473544</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2024 16:34:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099473544</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099473544@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>weekly sale flyer from a 'surplus electronic component mail order shop' ( sort of like polypack, for those that remember that far back )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"just in high voltage fly back transformers" Um, i have never heard of a low voltage flyback.. it dont work that way...  lol. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099473177</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2024 19:32:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099473177</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099473177@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Let it run down.   Now its 100% dead.</p>
<p>Sigh. i liked that thing.   I'm sure its the charging circuit or dc-dc converter, which is on the main board, not worth the % to bring it back to life. ( plus ist glued together and like 25 screws too, so you end up destroying the back panel + battery pulling it apart. so more $. and the last thing i want to do is buy a battery..   fraud city.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099472188</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 20:40:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099472188</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099472188@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Grrrr i think my pixelbook is F-ed.   Runs on battery. ( its around 60% so its not 'dead' )</p>
<p>Plug it into a "real" power supply, it powers down after a minute or two.   Plug it into a 'small' supply, it complains its low power as expected, ( and will slowly discharge ) but runs.</p>
<p>Powerwash, didnt help.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Grrrr</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099472103</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 15:43:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099472103</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099472103@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ah then ya. no blip.</p>
<p>Some of those things a blip dont matter, so they dont plan for that.  ( actually, id say most use cases, a blip dont matter. )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon May 20 2024 09:19:44 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">From the web site: <br /><br />"The Backup-Mobile UPS is designed to keep your equipment from losing power or rebooting during engine start-up, ensuring these spikes and sags in power don't shorten the life of your mission critical electronics. We do this by providing uninterrupted, clean, consistent power to your equipment, extending the life of your electronics up to 2 to 3 more years." </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099472090</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 13:54:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099472090</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099472090@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > "The Backup-Mobile UPS is designed to keep your equipment from losing 
 
 >power or rebooting during engine start-up, ensuring these spikes and   
  
 Sounds like just the thing to put between the battery and ham transciever
in the car.  I'll keep that in mind, once I get my ticket and save up funds
for 2m/440 mobile. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099472089</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2024 13:19:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099472089</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099472089@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[From the web site: 
  
 "The Backup-Mobile UPS is designed to keep your equipment from losing power
or rebooting during engine start-up, ensuring these spikes and sags in power
don't shorten the life of your mission critical electronics. We do this by
providing uninterrupted, clean, consistent power to your equipment, extending
the life of your electronics up to 2 to 3 more years." 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099471999</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2024 21:21:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099471999</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099471999@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>YES.. welcome to my world :)   Its not generating any solar power.. its a consumer of and storage of ..  ( now, if you want to talk about fusion generators, i might meet someone 1/2 way on that one. While technically its just releasing energy in the H2, its sort of generating in a 'traditional sense', and it is sort of making solar energy as its making light and heat...  )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And not disagreeing, it is basically the same and should work fine. But, is it enough wattage? And be sure to check if it cuts out as it switches over from DC in to just battery.  That was the one advantage of the solar controller, you could wire it so it did not do that. ( or choosing the right integrated unit, not all do and you do get that short blip on some.. but plenty of them will )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and too bad about the used drive going belly up.. )</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun May 19 2024 16:56:18 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">"solar generator" (ugh that term).</span></p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099471996</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 May 2024 20:56:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099471996</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099471996@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well, the 800 GB drive has ~35000 hours on it.  That's about three years of continuous operation, and its mirror partner suffered an early demise when they were serving as the main storage in my desktop machine.  So I'm not going to give it any hard work to do.  I've got a backup of /boot/efi and I can throw any old drive in there if I need to replace it.  The other three disks, those are brand new.</p>
<p>I think I may have found my answer to the "little DC UPS" problem, without having to repurpose a consumer "solar generator" (ugh that term).</p>
<p><img src="
<p>From [ <a href="https://www.powerstream.com/d-sine-dc-ups.htm">https://www.powerstream.com/d-sine-dc-ups.htm</a> ]</p>
<p>"<span style="font-family: Optimum, Optima, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Self-contained automotive battery backup system with 5AH battery.  </span><span style="font-family: Optimum, Optima, Geneva, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">12 volt DC UPS module or battery backup (BBU) keeps 12 volt equipment alive in cars, buses, trucks and taxis using an internal sealed lead acid battery. Useful for vehicles with automatic start-stop features."</span></p>
<p>12 volts in, 12 volts out, SLA battery inside, 12 amps continuous rating (15 amps surge).  And it even has mounting tabs, perfect for my on-wall setup.  For USD$200 it's in the same price range as a desktop UPS and it'll take care of my 12 volt setup without wasting any energy on inversion.  That's my whole goal, of course, since computers run on low-ish DC it makes sense to avoid stepping up to 120 VAC only to step back down to 12 VDC.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099471822</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2024 19:19:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099471822</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099471822@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Boot disk: Intel SSDSC2BA800G3 (800 GB) enterprise grade SSD.  This   
 >disk only holds /boot/efi and swap.   
  
 800 GB for holding just /boot and swap and meanwhile the workstations at
$job running out of space because they have drives worth 40 Gb XD 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099471064</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 23:17:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099471064</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099471064@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>May not be as fancy, but It would be about the same as i was talking.</p>
<p>Would be easy to test if its smart enough.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri May 10 2024 18:43:15 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Battery system is coming. Dunno when. And I'm wondering whether I was overthinking it. I have an extra car battery charger here. Perhaps I should just wire it to a deep cycle marine battery and then straight out to the load? The charger already knows how to back off when the battery is full, so it would seem that's all the sophistication that's needed? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099471058</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2024 22:43:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099471058</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099471058@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Battery system is coming.  Dunno when.   And I'm wondering whether I was overthinking
it.  I have an extra car battery charger here.  Perhaps I should just wire
it to a deep cycle marine battery and then straight out to the load?  The
charger already knows how to back off when the battery is full, so it would
seem that's all the sophistication that's needed? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099470959</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 11:11:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099470959</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099470959@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Batteries. Project Phase 2. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed May 08 2024 22:26:33 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">.<br /><br />Feels good to be home again. And it will continue to feel good until the next power outage. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099470944</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 May 2024 02:26:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099470944</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099470944@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[...aaaaaaaaand it's done!  www.citadel.org and uncensored.citadel.org are
now running on "kremvax", the lovely little microserver I built to take my
hosting operations back home. 
  
 Here are the specs, which you don't care about, but I'll list for posterity
anyway. 
  
 Case: a cute little Datto backup appliance, repurposed as a generic Mini-ITX
computer. 
 Power supply: PicoPSU-120, modified to bypass the PicoPSU for the P4 CPU
power connector.  Currently fed by a 120 watt 12 volt DC power brick.  I have
plans to add battery backup and maybe even a solar panel to supplement it.

 Brains: Intel Core i9-9900 @ 3.10 GHz.  8 cores, 16 threads.  Turbo boost
is disabled to stay within power budget. 
 Memory: 32 GB 
 Boot disk: Intel SSDSC2BA800G3 (800 GB) enterprise grade SSD.  This disk
only holds /boot/efi and swap. 
 Data disks: 3 x Intel SSDSC2BX016T4K (1.6 TB) enterprise grade SSD.  These
are formatted as a btrfs volume and mounted as the root filesystem.  RAID1
mirroring is in effect. 
  
 For the time being, www.citadel.org and uncensored.citadel.org are running
as virtual machines.  I just copied them verbatim from their old location.
 In the coming weeks or months I will be converting them to LXC containers
so they will use the hardware more efficiently.  The VPN router, which tunnels
the hosting environment to the data center where it is exposed to the public
Internet, has already been converted to a container. 
  
 Feels good to be home again.  And it will continue to feel good until the
next power outage. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099468771</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 May 2024 11:34:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099468771</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099468771@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Speaking of SSD</p>
<p>Been having an issue over here that i thought was power related. System turning off at random times. Not just a freeze but actual power down.</p>
<p>Turns out its a bad SSD.. never seen that one before. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099466300</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Apr 2024 04:04:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099466300</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099466300@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >So we are now to be in the basement? How fitting :)   
  
 I've got some enterprise SSD's coming this week, so if they work properly
then yes, Uncensored will be down here in the garage sometime soon.  I've
been spending some of my late nights here ever since installing this machine,
not using it as a server (yet) but as simply another place to tinker.  This
room is also my "shop" so there's a bit of a "man cave" feel to it, reminiscent
of the basement in my old house where I spent many nights on the computer.

  
 The screen is an old Westinghouse LCD with 1280x1024 display.  I'm running
my terminal program with the Terminus font in 12 point (one of its native
sizes) with font smoothing disabled.  It has a lovely look, a bit retro but
clean and easy to look at. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099466063</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:11:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099466063</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099466063@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Have</p>
<p>still have 8 of the mini ones, and 1 of the project i help start + the expansion bus board.</p>
<p>None of them are populated .  just shoved in a bag in the closet. I started to populate the fruit of my project.. but that is when i started losing interest in it all. So after a few caps, it was over. ( and the next month or so later, the retro-purge happened )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Apr 24 2024 22:24:56 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">You had Z80 boards? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099466016</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 02:24:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099466016</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099466016@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[You had Z80 boards? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099465546</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:42:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099465546</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099465546@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"day of the dead battery"</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Boogie board on the fridge for groceries.. dead. ( but impressive, it had the original battery for close to 10 years i think. it was a gen1.. still going strong )</p>
<p>One of the security cams.. dead</p>
<p>My bedroom IP phone.. dead..</p>
<p>One of the cars.. dead..</p>
<p>Living room thermometer.. dead..</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099465543</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:08:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099465543</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099465543@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Boards went back into the closet to rot.</p>
<p>If anyone wants one....</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099465540</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2024 22:05:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099465540</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099465540@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Neat!  The Z80 ended up having a very long life because it turned out to be
a really versatile processor for embedded systems, somewhere between a microcontroller
and a fully modern CPU.  And some of those designs are built with the idea
of a VERY long term sourcing in mind. 
  
 Zilog built Intel's 8-bit design better than Intel did.  Just like AMD builds
Intel's 64-bit better. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099465484</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:00:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099465484</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099465484@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And related, ran across the board from the z80 project i started on Usenet.. that another guy picked up and finished and went WAY beyond what i had planned.. ( i had to pause, eye issues for a while ).  Even still have the CP/M eeprom to go with it.     I never even planned for a PCB.. he did that, expansion bus.. bla bla.  became something impressive. </p>
<p>And in the bag, 8 z80mbc2 boards i had made back in 2008 ( when seed studio was just getting going. they were the best priced at the time for PCB production ) I guess it was a pack of 10, minimum order, so i must have gave 2 away.. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Back when this stuff was still fun.  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099465324</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 15:47:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099465324</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099465324@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So the Z80 is being discontinued in June. Zilog is taking ' last orders '.</p>
<p>I didnt even realize it was still being made..  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099456080</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Apr 2024 20:32:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099456080</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099456080@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ok as much as i hate NVIDIA, for the time being i wish i had an A100.  or even a H100.  at least until the bigger T/NPUs are availble to the common serfs.</p>
<p>Trying to run some models today, just cant do it unless i at least have 24gb on ONE card.  It wont spread it across my 2 cards. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099431557</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2024 00:06:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099431557</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099431557@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>that really isn't new or news.  Forgetting RISC for a moment, ASIC in the form of TPU/NPU/APU  have been around a while, but things are improving quickly and the advancements of LLMs and the attention they are getting now means there is a true market for big ones, not just little Edge stuff like we have had for a while, nearly everywhere ( just no one noticed )</p>
<p>Google ( home of TPU ) has data centers full of them.  " tensor processor unit " Tensors are the current 'thing' for language model AI, and pattern recognition.  I have a standalone Edge TPU ( they run tensor flow lite.. so reduced instruction set ) which is amazingly fast. </p>
<p>GPU really only as a couple of advantages: is its here 'now' and true, you can buy huge ones.  right now.. . However its advantage is starting to crack as size and power requirements, ASICs eat GPU for lunch.   Just look at the crypto world. same thing happened there.  GPU got it going, and once the market was there, ASIC ate its lunch.    The only other advantage GPU will have is if the underlying architecture of LLMs change. ASIC will be useless at that point and have to start over. But GPU can adapt with code.</p>
<p>I know i have told these stories before about ASIC. but having lived thru it with crypto first hand, its taking the same path, so will have the same future. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And yes.  NVIDIA can suck it.  But they are starting to add TPU like components to their high end GPUs, so even they see the light and are trying to adapt before its too late.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Apr 10 2024 16:54:33 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">  Building inference algorithms that don't have to restrict themselves to instructions a video chip can execute?  Yes yes, please.  Rapidly speeding towards a state where massively parallel algorithms no longer require a room full of watercooled equipment?  Yes yes YES please.</span></p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099429983</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Apr 2024 20:54:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099429983</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099429983@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>After checking out Techmoan's latest RISC-V video I learned that it might actually be the next big thing in "AI" (always, always, always put "AI" in quotes because it is neither artifical nor intelligent).</p>
<p>And that makes sense.  High density RISC-V could commoditize massively-parallel computing faster, cheaper, and with more versatility per watt than that is currently being done with repurposed video chips.  Steering the market away from an Nvidia monopoly?  Yes please.  Building inference algorithms that don't have to restrict themselves to instructions a video chip can execute?  Yes yes, please.  Rapidly speeding towards a state where massively parallel algorithms no longer require a room full of watercooled equipment?  Yes yes YES please.</p>
<p>As has been the case with everything else, the big tipping point comes when it's in everyone's hands at commodity prices.  Just as the really cool stuff in computing happened after we moved off the mainframe, the really cool stuff in high density algorithms will happen after we move off the cloud.  As everyone knows (and as many agree), I absolutely abhor the idea of all computing being consolidated into the data centers of a few tech giants.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099404957</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2024 15:48:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099404957</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099404957@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Figures. That company who was making some super state of the art NPUs have stopped selling chips. Decided just to build a data center and sell access to AI model running on them.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Bleh. So sick of walled gardens.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099387612</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 12:07:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099387612</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099387612@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>ooooo ( from news i saw this morning ) assuming we dont all die from WWiii this fall, 2025 is going to be the year RISC-V really takes off and becomes mainstream for the masses.</p>
<p>Google has also contracted with sifive for all their "internal silicon, including TPU". so i assume that means slow migration of all their data centers, and AI stuff.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"X-Silicon Inc. (XSi) has created a new RISC-V microprocessing chip architecture that combines a RISC-V CPU core with vector capabilities and GPU acceleration into a single chip. The CPU/GPU hybrid chip is open-standard and will reportedly be open-source as well, Jon Peddie Research reports, and it's designed to handle a variety of different functions, including AI, which dedicated CPUs and GPUs would normally handle."</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099387606</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 12:04:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099387606</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099387606@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The ones 'for' solar normally only nativity charge via 12v since they are 'made' for solar, but can also handle car lighter ( err 'accessory' ) plug, 12v gas, whatever.  They normally come with 60watt or so wall warts for wall charging inside the house, but most will accept 100watt or more to charge from ( to accommodate larger solar panels )..  ( the one i built, i added 2 input charge ports.. )</p>
<p>My thought was just use whatever you were going to use for 120v to 12v for the servers in the first place and stick this in the middle to get it to be uninterruptible. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Apr 05 2024 23:41:59 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>Oh and i tossed an egg your way for calling it a solar generator :P  </blockquote>
<br /><br />Hey, I put it inside sarcasm quotes! I have a real generator that runs on diesel fuel! <br /><br />But yes, if I got one of those battery things and if it could accept 120VAC mains and 12VDC input at the same time, I could get a couple of solar panels later on and use them to offset the power costs. And I could tie it in to the 12VDC output of my (real) generator. Actually that would be pretty cool, <br /><br /><br />because my generator's 12VDC output is mechanically and electrically separate from its 120VAC output. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099385564</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Apr 2024 03:41:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099385564</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099385564@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Oh and i tossed an egg your way for calling it a solar generator :P   
 
    
 Hey, I put it inside sarcasm quotes!  I have a real generator that runs on
diesel fuel!   
    
 But yes, if I got one of those battery things and if it could accept 120VAC
mains and 12VDC input at the same time, I could get a couple of solar panels
later on and use them to offset the power costs.  And I could tie it in to
the 12VDC output of my (real) generator.  Actually that would be pretty cool,
   
  
 because my generator's 12VDC output is mechanically and electrically separate
from its 120VAC output. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099384215</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 21:42:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099384215</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099384215@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh and i tossed an egg your way for calling it a solar generator :P </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099384209</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 21:40:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099384209</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099384209@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Right the inverter is totally optional on these things.  Dont turn it on, its not going t use any juice.  Sure, its 'there' but if its off.. does it matter?  And sure, you can build one, but once you add up cost of parts, its not much more to get a nice pretty package. Add a bit for your labor, you are in the hole. </p>
<p>the only advantage of the one i built is i could always run wire to a bank of car batteries or something in a super emergency.  But its hacked together, heavier, and i saved perhaps 50 bucks...  ( in your case the 'box' dont matter, its going on a shelf, where i wanted mine to be portable, but you get the idea )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And not saying the one i sent the link for is 'it' but its one example of many.  Just choose the amperage you want, and make sure it does pass-thru... </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Apr 05 2024 16:28:38 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>i suppose it would be possible. But its not running, unless you turn <br />it on.  I have a couple of different styles, and you have to </blockquote>
<br />Well if you have to turn it on, then that would imply that "the switch" is already built in and I don't have to add it. <br /><br />So about $300 for an appropriate size "solar generator." I still feel like there ought to be a way to float a charge across an SLA battery with just a few parts if the source and load are both already 12 volts. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099383939</link><pubDate>Fri, 05 Apr 2024 20:28:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099383939</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099383939@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >i suppose it would be possible. But its not running, unless you turn  
 >it on.  I have a couple of different styles, and you have to  
  
 Well if you have to turn it on, then that would imply that "the switch" is
already built in and I don't have to add it. 
  
 So about $300 for an appropriate size "solar generator."  I still feel like
there ought to be a way to float a charge across an SLA battery with just
a few parts if the source and load are both already 12 volts. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099379198</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 23:45:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099379198</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099379198@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>i suppose it would be possible. But its not running, unless you turn it on.  I have a couple of different styles, and you have to intentionally turn that on....  so not sure why you would care. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Apr 01 2024 18:42:18 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">I wonder if it would be possible to add a switch to *really* cut the supply to the inverter? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099379174</link><pubDate>Mon, 01 Apr 2024 22:42:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099379174</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099379174@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I wonder if it would be possible to add a switch to *really* cut the supply
to the inverter? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099379056</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2024 11:38:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099379056</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099379056@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have, but these days id not bother id just get those portable devices and stick it on a shelf. In my case i do want the 120v, but the 12v works fine too.   </p>
<p>Now if i wanted to run a KW of machines in some sort of mission critical data center, perhaps id build it. But you were not talking much of a power drain. So why go overboard and over-engineer things? The one in the link would run several hours, and would not need more than one.  If i was in the same boat, personally its not worth the effort when all i would need to do is cut a few cables ( for daisy chaining it up the rack ). </p>
<p>Tho my needs are slightly different here, it would serve the same purpose if i was going to tie them to the generator too for extended use ( i dont, let it go down ).  My real use case is just to get by the slight blips we have here often, and a controlled shut down if it dont come back.  At one point i cheated and got a cheap UPS for that, since its got the USB monitor. </p>
<p>My real use for these sort of batteries is to power the fridge, wives O2 machine, couple of fans. etc. at night so i dont run the noisy ass generator at 2AM..  So simple + portable = win for me.   My generator has 12v out too, so i can charge up the batteries for that night if needed. But on sunny days solar is plenty, not so sunny or if i need extra power ( it will push close to 5k. not a lot but plenty for our needs ), then its generator.  But i will turn off all non-essentials in the house.   ( helps we have gas heat/cooking/water ). But with the 12v out.. seemed like an easy match for what you wanted. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Mar 30 2024 20:03:19 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Right ... I should have clarified that what I want to do would be in the spirit of a telecom rack, if you've ever seen one of those. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099379038</link><pubDate>Sun, 31 Mar 2024 00:03:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099379038</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099379038@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Right ... I should have clarified that what I want to do would be in the spirit
of a telecom rack, if you've ever seen one of those. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099379034</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 23:33:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099379034</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099379034@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>But if you really are just dead set on building one:</p>
<p>Some (12v ) batteries on shelves to supply enough current for the time you want it to run during blackout + a cheap ( 20 bucks ) solar charge controller to charge them = ups.    Don't need to add the inverter. Controller takes 12v DC like you want to feed it anyway, and will charge your batteries.  Ya it says 'solar' but that is only because its runs on 12v in/out, which is what most panels do.. Its not 'special' or anything, just convenient. </p>
<p>Just be sure to tap off the charging side instead of the 'official output' to run to your devices then its pass thru. Most will drop "official output" power for an instant during the outage and you dont want that, but tapping off incoming takes care of that..</p>
<p>Now, id not be trying to run my house like that.. but for what you are doing, its fine.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099379025</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 21:19:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099379025</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099379025@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh, and the 120v is totally optional.   the 12v/5v out works fine without ever turning the inverter on. Separate circuits. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099379018</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 20:03:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099379018</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099379018@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>These have 120v, 12v, and 5v output on the front panel.  They charge using DC since they are made for solar charging, but do come with an adapter if you wanted to charge via 120 instead of your 12v line..  Now,  i wasn't meaning "GET THIS ONE NOW OR YOU ARE A LOSER" it was just an example of something that wasn't 1k.. and does have the 12v out you need for your devices.</p>
<p>Sure, it wont last weeks as its not THAT big.. but since all you are worried about was the down time before the generator came on, its more than enough.  And its portable. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Mar 30 2024 15:54:07 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>Seems they are on sale. for just over 200 -&gt;  <br />https://www.amazon.com/VTOMAN-Portable-Generator-Expandable-Regulated/</blockquote>
<br /><br />I was really hoping for something *without* a 120VAC stage. Strictly DC-to-DC-to-DC. <br />Like a car. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099379015</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 19:56:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099379015</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099379015@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >And ya, while most of us agree the centralized money suck/control the  
 >mainframes were was bad, IBM was not the worst..  it was to come  
 >after.   
  
 There were systems worse than IBM.  Burroughs for example had some truly
horrifying machines. 
  
 Obviously it was the *culture* of suck (in both senses of the word) that
surrounded IBM, then Microsoft, and now "the cloud" that we in the free world
have always found repulsive. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099379014</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 19:54:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099379014</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099379014@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Seems they are on sale. for just over 200 ->   
 >https://www.amazon.com/VTOMAN-Portable-Generator-Expandable-Regulated/ 

  
 I was really hoping for something *without* a 120VAC stage.  Strictly DC-to-DC-to-DC.
 Like a car. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099379008</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 18:10:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099379008</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099379008@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Perhaps he did have it all, at one point?</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And ya, while most of us agree the centralized money suck/control the mainframes were was bad, IBM was not the worst..  it was to come after. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099379005</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Mar 2024 17:54:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099379005</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099379005@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I hated IBM 30 years ago when they were the ones ruining everything.  That's
old news.  There's a story behind the 360 nameplate.  My dad once said to
someone "I've got the front panel of a System/360 in my garage" and I thought
he meant the ENTIRE front panel with all the knobs and switches and lights,
and I soooooo wanted to see it, and wire it up to make a light show!  Many
years later I found this in the garage.  It wasn't the whole front panel,
only the name badge.  Now he's going senile and I'm cleaning out their garage,
so this piece definitely came home with me. 
  
 Those familiar with the "kremvax" legend also know that kremvax wasn't actually
a VAX, it was a Sun. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099378962</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 22:36:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099378962</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099378962@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Nice.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 29 2024 00:11:34 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>In case anyone cares, here's a photo of kremvax, the future home of uncensored.citadel.org and www.citadel.org and a bunch of other things:</p>
<p><img src="
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>PS: I thought you hated IBM ;-)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099378927</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 12:34:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099378927</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099378927@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So we are now to be in the basement? How fitting :) </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099378910</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 04:11:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099378910</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099378910@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>In case anyone cares, here's a photo of kremvax, the future home of uncensored.citadel.org and www.citadel.org and a bunch of other things:</p>
<p><img src="
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099378901</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Mar 2024 00:40:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099378901</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099378901@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I paid ~ 300 for the last few i got. Not sure where you are seeing 1k for small ones.   </p>
<p>Seems they are on sale. for just over 200 -&gt;  https://www.amazon.com/VTOMAN-Portable-Generator-Expandable-Regulated/dp/B0BBDQ5NNN</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Mar 28 2024 19:15:23 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Those things seem pretty expensive. Over USD$1000 for even a small one. I can't imagine a passthrough charger, a decent battery, and a regulator could cost that much. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099378893</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Mar 2024 23:15:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099378893</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099378893@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Those things seem pretty expensive.  Over USD$1000 for even a small one. 
I can't imagine a passthrough charger, a decent battery, and a regulator could
cost that much. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099378536</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 17:44:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099378536</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099378536@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Myself i woudl just buy one of those solar batteries, instead of a 'real' ups. ( i refuse to call them a generator :) )  They do the same job, and seem cheaper.  Most, tho not all so you have to read, will do pass thru charging.  Can get them in most any size you want, from enough to charge a phone a couple of times to running a house.. depending on how long you want it to run. Most have 12v native output along side 110</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And i say buy it not build, as i did that a year or 2 ago myself for solar panels. By the time i got all the bits and pieces, it was so close to the same price it was stupid of me to hack something together.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099378531</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Mar 2024 16:01:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099378531</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099378531@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 All righty then ... back to the topic of the mighty but diminutive kremvax,
which is now idling in my basement fully configured but awaiting the rest
of its storage (a friend has some good enterprise grade drives but I have
to find a way to get them here). 
  
 As a refresher: kremvax is an i9-9900 ITX powered by a PicoPSU-120, but I
bypassed the PicoPSU and split the 12 volt input directly into the P4 CPU
power socket.  The power brick feeding it is still 120 watts, but because
of the mod I could probably go higher; but I'm not interested because 3.6
GHz x 16 threads is more than enough for my workload. 
  
 Now for the question: how can I build a decent UPS for this thing?  I've
been scouring the Interwebz for "12 volt UPS" and am finding plenty of plans
(and prebuilts) for little power supplies with 18650's or LiFePO4 cells, designed
to keep your router and wifi up and running.  I've
already got that.  I need something that can push 120 watts (10 amps @ 12
volts) -- not for hours and hours, just long enough for an ATS to operate,
or if it's a "real" outage (rare around here) for me to get the generator
started. 
  
 Does anyone know where to get plans for such a thing?  Or barring that, how
to design one?  I know you can't just drop a battery across the power supply
positive/negative leads and hope for the best, because that could overcharge
the battery, and also backfeed the supply when it's not charging.  What kind
of Battery Management System can handle what I'm trying to do? 
  
 Some people say "get a consumer grade UPS and tie into the 12 volt side".
 Others say don't do that because a consumer grade UPS isn't built to charge
and invert at the same time, which is why the 120 volt side is just a feed-through
when the unit is not operating in discharge mode. 
  
 Someone with electric knowledge more jedi than mine, help me out here? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099378368</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 16:51:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099378368</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099378368@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Wait until i get my RISC board this fall.  At that point im out of the market and dont care anymore.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Mar 21 2024 11:34:30 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Well yes, we do need mega-tariffs to restore the balance of trade that they're manipulating. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099378353</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 15:34:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099378353</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099378353@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Well yes, we do need mega-tariffs to restore the balance of trade that they're
manipulating.  We do like our cheap hardware, though. 
  
 But it just goes to reinforce the old rule: "License your technology on favorable
terms or it will be cloned."  ARM Holdings had better be paying attention,
since they will soon no longer have a lock on the "cheaper than Intel" space.
 Low power consumption and favorable licensing terms have rocketed ARM to
fame and fortune, but a fully open and commoditized technology is a game changer
once it reaches critical mass.  Just ask Sun/HP/IBM/etc. how their unices
are doing. 
  
 Give it another decade and Apple will move.  They're already on their fourth
ISA and have shown they can change over without losing their step. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099377170</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Mar 2024 02:06:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099377170</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099377170@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>China is going to try that whether we sanction it or not. We need to cut off all trade with communist/socialist nations, it has cost us too many jobs and factories.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Mar 10 2024 20:09:26 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>They lead the way for RISC-V, due to sanctions and such.     All those things do in the long run is make your enemy self-sufficient. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Mar 10 2024 14:41:05 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=msgrhys">msgrhys</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Ugh China.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099377063</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Mar 2024 00:09:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099377063</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099377063@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>They lead the way for RISC-V, due to sanctions and such.     All those things do in the long run is make your enemy self-sufficient. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Mar 10 2024 14:41:05 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=msgrhys">msgrhys</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Ugh China.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099377043</link><pubDate>Sun, 10 Mar 2024 18:41:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099377043</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099377043@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ugh China.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 08 2024 17:59:01 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>ooo  some cloud provider is offering data center level RISC-V for cheap.  TH1520 SoC, 16GB RAM, and 128GB eMMC storage, for about 20 bucks a month...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>One source -&gt;  </p>
<p><a href="https://www.techradar.com/pro/worlds-first-aws-rival-launches-bare-metal-servers-based-on-chinese-risc-v-cpu-and-costs-only-cents-per-hour-to-run-but-will-it-live-to-regret-using-emmc-storage" target="webcit01">https://www.techradar.com/pro/worlds-first-aws-rival-launches-bare-metal-servers-based-on-chinese-risc-v-cpu-and-costs-only-cents-per-hour-to-run-but-will-it-live-to-regret-using-emmc-storage</a></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376954</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2024 22:59:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376954</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376954@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>ooo  some cloud provider is offering data center level RISC-V for cheap.  TH1520 SoC, 16GB RAM, and 128GB eMMC storage, for about 20 bucks a month...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>One source -&gt;  </p>
<p>https://www.techradar.com/pro/worlds-first-aws-rival-launches-bare-metal-servers-based-on-chinese-risc-v-cpu-and-costs-only-cents-per-hour-to-run-but-will-it-live-to-regret-using-emmc-storage</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376728</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 11:48:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376728</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376728@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>ah so that explains the noise i heard.  Divide by zero is always disruptive.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>:) </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376719</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 03:24:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376719</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376719@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Yup.  That was at lunchtime.  It ran stable all afternoon so after work I
took it down to the workshop, soldered and heatshrinked all of the wiring
changes I made, and put it back together.  It's sitting on the shelf in my
office now and it's adorable.  I've got an old 800 GB SSD in it now, but I'm
expecting three more drives from a super secret source in the not too distant
future, which is when I'll move my hosting stuff onto it. 
  
 As a test, I ran `stress -c 16` for a while to see what it would do under
load.  All cores went to 100% and the clock speed pegged at 3.1 GHz, but it's
quite stable.  Then I rebooted it with turbo boost enabled and ran the test
again.  The machine shut down the moment the test started, confirming my findings.

  
 Now here's something funny.  I loaded up Citadel in a container and ran its
load test program.  The load test program ran a second or two and then
raised a floating point exception.  It did that over and over again.  I thought
I had uncovered another hardware problem.  After some navel gazing I realized
what was happening.  It has an "operations per second" counter that uses the
formula: 
  
  ops per second = ops completed / (current_time - time_started) 
  
 And this is the first machine I've tried it on that was fast enough and parallel
enough to do that calculation (which happens in the initial thread after it
has launched all the others) while the elapsed time was still less than one
second.  I think that's a good thing! 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376714</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:41:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376714</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376714@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not surprised in the least..   But at least it can handle the non turbo mode and not reset. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Mar 04 2024 19:26:35 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />Until I disabled turbo, the machine would reset every time the Debian install got to around 30% of the first phase. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376711</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2024 00:26:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376711</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376711@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, it's here, and it's running.  I did have to do both of the things I
anticipated: 
  
 1. Attach the P4 CPU power cable directly to the 12 volt input, bypassing
the PicoPSU. 
 2. Disable turbo boost.  So instead of a 5 GHz boost clock, all cores will
remain at the 3.1 GHz base clock. 
  
 Until I disabled turbo, the machine would reset every time the Debian install
got to around 30% of the first phase. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376471</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2024 00:34:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376471</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376471@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > You might have to go all the way down to a 35W TDP limit -- if your   
 >board can be set that low.   
  
 I'm looking at the manual for the motherboard now.  (It'll be here in a day
or two anyway, but just looking in advance.) 
  
 There's definitely an option to turn off Intel Turbo Boost, so that would
theoretically cap it at the base clock and therefore the base wattage.  Can
also disable some cores, but I'd rather not do that. 
  
 Let's see what else is there... 
  
 "CPU Thermal Monitor" (reduces core frequency and voltage when it heats up)

 "Voltage Optimization" (reduces power consumption) 
 And a bunch of controls for undervolting specific components. 
  
 So I guess I'll come out of the gate with turbo boost disabled, and take
some power measurements.  I probably shouldn't have bought this board, but
it was CPU+motherboard+32GB for basically the price of the CPU alone, so I
accepted the offer without thinking to check the power draw. 
  
 Also there are apparently some Linux kernel settings that can perform finer
adjustments. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376429</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 14:04:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376429</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376429@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Sort of funny, talking about such small wattage. A couple of my GPUs will suck nearly 300 watts each. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376428</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Feb 2024 13:53:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376428</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376428@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 You might have to go all the way down to a 35W TDP limit -- if your board
can be set that low. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376395</link><pubDate>Wed, 28 Feb 2024 22:10:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376395</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376395@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah.  I'll have the hardware soon enough, and plenty of time to run tests
before I put it into production.  That's why I intend to put it on the meter
while I test it.  Maybe it's fine with no TDP cap, maybe I have to set one.
 Working in my favor is the fact that as a server it will not be using the
GPU and my workloads are not really calculation intensive. 
  
 If I really run out of power budget I can get a bigger 12 volt supply and
connect the P4 ("cpu power") connector directly to the input, bypassing the
PicoPSU.  That might work, especially if I were to get a small UPS and attach
directly to the battery, bypassing the inverter.  That's a thing, isn't it?

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376343</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 23:32:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376343</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376343@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>cutting it pretty close. </p>
<p>Be easy to load it down with some benchmarks, see if it holds up, instead of theoretical calculations and WAGs only.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376341</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 23:28:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376341</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376341@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The reason I'm wondering is because I sort of jumped the gun and bought a
CPU/RAM/Motherboard that was offered to me at a pretty steep discount, one
that was so good that I forgot to check the power requirements.  My power
supply might be hurting as much as my credit card bill  :( 
  
 Gigabyte H310N 2.0 ITX + i9-9900 GPU + 32 GB RAM. 
  
 I've got to get that running inside a 120 watt power budget.  At idle this
should be no problem but I will certainly need to put a cap on boost mode.
 The i9-9900 has a 65 watt TDP.  From what I've read, it's no slouch even
at its base clock.  120 watts at 12 volts is 10 amps, and my multimeter has
a 10 amp capacity for current readings, so I'll be putting that in line to
see what it's drawing. 
  
 And of course it will be running for quite a while before I move my workloads
to it, because I don't have the disk drives yet. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376301</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 12:10:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376301</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376301@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>kids and their fancy toys. in MY day, we.....   lol</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Tho the other day when i had to find a heatsink+fan for that MB i pulled out of the closet. Not needed to pay attention for a while, but man they have become huge beasts.... was hard to find one small enough to fit in my case.  not the heatsinks when i grew up.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Now, get off my lawn!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376271</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2024 02:58:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376271</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376271@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah.  Apparently you can set a "TDP limit" on some motherboards now.  Probably
intended for heat management but I will need to keep the consumed power down
as well.  Undervolting also appears to be a thing. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376252</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 23:15:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376252</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376252@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-02-25 19:10 from IGnatius T Foobar       
 >And I'm wondering how big a power supply I "really" need.  My PicoPSU  
    
 >is 120 watts.  I could squeeze more power out of it by bypassing it for
     
 >the P4 connector and using a bigger brick.  What does a modern computer
     
 >do if the power supply can't deliver enough watts?  Does it just slow  
    
 >down or does it go into Mr. Bonkers mode?       
      
 It goes Bonkers. Typically it is individual components that go Bonkers. 
   
    
 For example, if you have a slightly underpowered supply and you turn a machine
with many devices on, some devices may attempt to initialize and fail. Sometimes
the firmware retries.   
  
 At least, that is the theory I was explained. It was common for underpoered
disk arrays to attempt to spin all the drives at once, have some of them fail
at the first try, and bring the whole array online on second try. It is bad
for the lifespan of the components. Don't fall short. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376182</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:21:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376182</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376182@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Last one i had that was low on power, it just shut down.  ( my fault, i put too big of a CPU in it.. was just a tad more than the PS could supply )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376181</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2024 00:10:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376181</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376181@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[And I'm wondering how big a power supply I "really" need.  My PicoPSU is 120
watts.  I could squeeze more power out of it by bypassing it for the P4 connector
and using a bigger brick.  What does a modern computer do if the power supply
can't deliver enough watts?  Does it just slow down or does it go into Mr.
Bonkers mode? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099376064</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2024 16:51:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099376064</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099376064@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The reason I find it interesting is because I may have a source for some "gently used" SAS SSDs.  If I can get them, and the backplane supports them, it would be worth buying a controller to get them running.</p>
<p>In case you haven't figured it out, I think about this project every day, but I am not buying the parts until after my truck is paid off in about three months, so it's a bit frustrating...</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099375553</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:44:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099375553</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099375553@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>No guesses..  I have never seen that before either. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099375548</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2024 18:01:53 -0000</pubDate><title>My weird backplane</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099375548@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So here's something weird.  The mITX case I bought has a 2.5" drive cage with a very odd backplane.  Through a lot of exploring I've come to understand that it is from a company called AIC and it's some sort of "dual port adapter".  The side that the disk plugs into appears to be a SAS/SATA compatible socket:</p>
<p><img src="
<p>But the back has TWO SATA PORTS per drive:</p>
<p><img src="
<p>I've never seen this before.  You can see that it accepts SAS disks because in the middle of the socket is the big gap and the small 7-pin receiver that attaches to the second channel of a dual-port SAS drive.  It looks like the side of the slot that is common to both SAS and SATA is wired to the first SATA port, and the SAS-specific part of the slot is wired to the second SATA port.</p>
<p>I've never seen anything like this before.  I'm wondering if the manufacturer's intention is for the system builder to use an SFF-to-quad-SATA cable like this one:</p>
<p><img src="
<p>Again, I've never seen the second channel of a SAS disk broken out onto a SATA connector like that.  But if I choose a controller that supports both SAS and SATA, I'm wondering if it would work?  Might it even see both channels in a multipath configuration?  I am a data center veteran so I know all about multipath I/O and how to make it work on Linux.</p>
<p>No guesses please!  Answer if you know.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099375117</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2024 15:28:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099375117</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099375117@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Grrrr M.2 in my AI server. Decided to die this morning. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099375081</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 23:06:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099375081</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099375081@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>ooo old apple time machine too ( 15 years + old ). i thought i have gave that away already. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>For a short period of time i used it as a router + backup, had some Linux tool that could manage it.  That ended up breaking so it went into the closet.  Same for my gen 3 ipod.. Linux tool to manage it... that quit.. so in the trash the device went.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099375076</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 22:51:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099375076</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099375076@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>More cleaning. Out goes the 10m switches..  WiFi G routers.. gone gone gone!</p>
<p>And lots of disks..  windows server 2008 licenses, ghost enterprise ( 25 year old )   and wow, they still sell ghost.. surprised... figured it would have been retired and replaced with Altiris suite when they bought them. ( and jack up the price )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099375038</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Feb 2024 14:25:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099375038</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099375038@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Silly question, still researching but thought id ask anyway.</p>
<p>New MB i just popped in a case this weekend. its got a couple of  PCIe X1 ports.  Thought about getting a USB C card, but wondering if it will work with Linux at all for starters, and if so, would it work with a USBC hub that has ports like HDMI, etc.. or just USBC data and that is it. If that is all it does, it makes it sort of pointless i think, unless you have no USB2/3 ports to use ( or need more ), and even then you can get a x1 card with tons of usb on it for cheaper )</p>
<p>So far i keep seeing 'includes drivers for windows x' but that is about it.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099374778</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 23:47:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099374778</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099374778@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Depends on the chip. some have OSS solutions, others you are stuck with vendor. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Feb 05 2024 18:20:44 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>2024-02-05 17:04 from Nurb432 &lt;nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org&gt; <br />that is a shame. Spartan 3 FPGA was a mainstay for hobbyists.  Sad <br />to see it go. <br /><br />I think i still have a spartan II in my FPGA box..  <br /><br />https://www.eejournal.com/article/amd-discontinues-coolrunner-and-xc9 5 </blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote>00-cplds-and-spartan-ii-and-3-fpgas-buy-em-while-you-can/ <br /><br /></blockquote>
<br />How do you program those things? Do you use the vendor HDK or are there open source options? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099374775</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 23:20:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099374775</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099374775@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-02-05 17:04 from Nurb432 <nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org>   
 >that is a shame. Spartan 3 FPGA was a mainstay for hobbyists.  Sad  
 >to see it go.   
 >  
 >I think i still have a spartan II in my FPGA box..    
 >  
 >https://www.eejournal.com/article/amd-discontinues-coolrunner-and-xc9 5
 
 >00-cplds-and-spartan-ii-and-3-fpgas-buy-em-while-you-can/  
 >  
  
 How do you program those things? Do you use the vendor HDK or are there open
source options? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099374752</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2024 17:04:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099374752</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099374752@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>that is a shame. Spartan 3 FPGA was a mainstay for hobbyists.  Sad to see it go.</p>
<p>I think i still have a spartan II in my FPGA box.. </p>
<p>https://www.eejournal.com/article/amd-discontinues-coolrunner-and-xc9500-cplds-and-spartan-ii-and-3-fpgas-buy-em-while-you-can/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099373164</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2024 20:27:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099373164</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099373164@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ran across an old BT speaker too.  ( i retired it as i replaced it with on that had a bigger battery + FM radio, in case of emergencies ). Testing to see if it still works, and charging.  Its been so long i had to go look up the light colors for when it was charged and it commented:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"Note: Battery will last up to 4 hours when connected wirelessly and up to 12 hours when connected through Line-In Audio Jack."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>BT takes that much power ?  Really? I didnt think it was THAT bad..</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099373160</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jan 2024 18:09:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099373160</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099373160@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Its old but i dont think qualifies for ancient..  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Going thru old stuff and tossing again this weekend. Ran across my 'pocket edge' tablet thingie.</p>
<p>Great idea, well implemented.  Was a android tablet + a eink reader, that opened like a book. Ink on one side, LCD on other. Would fold all the way around back to back, and could be used as a stand in 'tent mode' ( like many chromebooks today. )  Even had a stylus that worked both on the ink and LCD..  which was rare back then. </p>
<p>Really liked it, but the company folded just before i bought the larger version. </p>
<p>They marketed to schools, which was the right market, but not yet..  in 2010 the world was not quite 'there yet'. </p>
<p>Was in the same box as my Newton.  Another fail story, tho that was murdered by dick-head Steve Jobs as one of the first acts of his return. So, not for technical or marketing reasons. He wanted his future phone, and no competition from other BUs allowed. Really there was room for both and the market for that sort of device was going to explode in a few years.. I bet he hated to eat his words when he had to allow the iPad ( loved my newt, as you can tell )</p>
<p>Guess ill drill a hole thru it and toss it.. Not really useful for collectors its so obscure, and i dont do that anymore.  ( the Newt, no.. it stays )</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099372401</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 23:23:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099372401</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099372401@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2024-01-03 12:05 from Nurb432     
 >Wow, just now hearing about this but Don Lancaster died last July..   
 
 > I think most of us here can appreciate what he did for the    
 >industry.      
 >    
    
 Thanks for bringing the story up.   
  
 This guy comes from well before my generation. We don't make us like they
used to. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099372361</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2024 17:05:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099372361</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099372361@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Wow, just now hearing about this but Don Lancaster died last July..   I think most of us here can appreciate what he did for the industry. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.eejournal.com/article/don-lancaster-the-electronics-industry-lost-another-pioneer-last-year/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099372112</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 22:23:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099372112</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099372112@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not going to get one, dont need it.</p>
<p>But.. ran across a couple of Chinese laptops that are doing it the right way. All laptops should be built this way.  A carrier board that runs all the peripherals, + a standard industrial SOM socket so you can stick whatever processor/ram/etc you want on it, AND upgrade, or downgrade, as you want. ( they are selling it with an RK3588 is how i noticed ).</p>
<p>Sort of how i wished the Pine Pro laptops were going to be..  but didnt quite work out that way.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099371396</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 16:50:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099371396</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099371396@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Twitter was a cesspool to start with, I hate to use it as an example for anything.   And regardless of their title, I suspect most of the people let go were part of the 'disinformation management task force' </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Dec 19 2023 09:22:20 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;">You're not wrong.</span></blockquote>
<br />Look at what happened at Twitter. Massive cuts to a mostly useless workforce. <br />And the company just kept going, just more efficiently. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099371371</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2023 14:22:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099371371</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099371371@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Devil's advocate maybe, but I will never question a tech company laying
 
 >anyone off. If where I work is any indication of the industry at large,
 
 >I estimate that most of the tech we enjoy is a product of about 10% of 
 
 >the work force and the remaining 90% are pretending just enough to   
 >barely stay employed.   
  
 You're not wrong. 
  
 Look at what happened at Twitter.  Massive cuts to a mostly useless workforce.
 And the company just kept going, just more efficiently. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099371246</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2023 14:52:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099371246</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099371246@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>While i agree 100% ( no surprise there :) ) , we also still use the crap, and i dont see it changing anytime in what is left of my career.   We also still use citrix, which is in the crap boat. Both paddling off into the abyss of irrelevancy, due to their own mistakes and greed.</p>
<p>And while i dont personally like them any more than Microsoft, you also have AWS and G-cloud as valid enterprise level options for hosting. ( and of course oracle, but they suck as much if not worse than VMware as their licensing is even more draconian from what i have been told )</p>
<p>Id much rather see us pull it all into proxmox, use a % of the savings form Azure/AWS/etc and help fund the the project with a few extra million.. and perhaps give some cash to the ceph folks too, and get rid of our convoluted storage nonsense that always seems to break. Our support staff, i doubt would need to be changed much. We actually had to add MORE staff when we started moving stuff to Azure..  ( like email, AD, etc )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Now that said, one of the recently announced goals is to move in-house apps off native OS's and into containers which would go towards making our hosting agnostic ( and even tho i dont like containers at a personal level for my own things, i will fully admit its not a bad move in our case, and surprising coming from our management of late )..  But we hired AWS to help, and the team we have is incompetent. </p>
<blockquote><br />
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Dec 17 2023 09:06:42 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br /><br />So why on earth would you run VMware at this point? If you want a commercially-supported offering, you go with Azure Stack. If you want the autonomy of an open source offering, you go with OpenStack or Proxmox. <br /><br />VMware is toast. [And if you happen to know where I work, my opinion is not necessarily that of my employer.] </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099371245</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2023 14:37:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099371245</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099371245@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>While partially true, its still indicative of a hit taken by the company.  Even if its fluff they trim, they are still trimming it.</p>
<p>Where i work we invented fluff, and id say its more like only 70% here, not 90%.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Dec 17 2023 09:10:16 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Devil's advocate maybe, but I will never question a tech company laying anyone off. If where I work is any indication of the industry at large, I estimate that most of the tech we enjoy is a product of about 10% of the work force and the remaining 90% are pretending just enough to barely stay employed. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099371239</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2023 14:10:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099371239</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099371239@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Devil's advocate maybe, but I will never question a tech company laying anyone
off. If where I work is any indication of the industry at large, I estimate
that most of the tech we enjoy is a product of about 10% of the work force
and the remaining 90% are pretending just enough to barely stay employed.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099371238</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Dec 2023 14:06:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099371238</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099371238@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[There was no breakdown of how many cuts were VMware people other than "a portion".
 I have a feeling that was quite a lot of them.  VMware is utterly failing
to compete in the cloud space despite having billed itself as a "cloud first"
company (like everyone else).  Over at ${dayjob} we are suspecting that the
focus of the VMware group will be little more than to provide software and
services focused on the needs of Broadcom's top 500 customers. 
  
 We use VMware heavily for both multitenant and private cloud environments,
and they keep raising their prices, making it unfavorable for us to build
with them. 
  
 Now here's something that'll *really* bake your noodle: 
  
 You can buy something called "Azure Stack" which is basically a Microsoft
Azure region running on your own hardware.  It's like having the entire VMware
management stack, but instead of running vCenter and vCloud Director
and all the other stuff, and maintaining it, you use the existing Azure portal
to manage it.  You still have to buy the hardware, of course.  The per-month
license costs can be less than half of what VMware charges!  And you don't
have to install and maintain it! 
  
 So why on earth would you run VMware at this point?  If you want a commercially-supported
offering, you go with Azure Stack.  If you want the autonomy of an open source
offering, you go with OpenStack or Proxmox. 
  
 VMware is toast.  [And if you happen to know where I work, my opinion is
not necessarily that of my employer.] 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099371177</link><pubDate>Sat, 16 Dec 2023 16:28:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099371177</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099371177@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Broadcom lays around 3K as they restructure and "shifting its focus to subscription licenses of bigger software bundles."  Well, of course they are. scumbags.  They, and their new acquisition VMWare need to be shut down. Forcefully, with fire.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.manufacturingdive.com/news/semiconductor-maker-broadcom-vmware-layoffs-almost-3k-new-york-virginia-california/702038/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370951</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:31:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370951</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370951@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>ARM laptops can hold their own too.</p>
<p>While true, most ( but not all ) are still stuck being Chromebooks,  if you break out of that they will keep pace with the 'same generation' of x86, and run cooler and suck less juice. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370949</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 15:26:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370949</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370949@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >This is so desperately needed.  We have 1 powerful architecture that  
 >nobody can keep up with in terms of single-core purrformance (amd64)  
  
 ARM is closing the purrformance gap quickly.  Consider that an AMD64 is typically
RISC on the inside with microcode surrounding it to handle the complexity,
and the complexity is mostly there to handle the fact that the architecture
is overengineered; this is a blank slate for sensible architectures like ARM
and RISC-V to use their transistor count to just make the damn thing run faster.

  
 Consider the speed of a new Mac.  It can hold its own against an AMD64 box
quite easily.  And as we discussed earlier, many of the new SBCs (particularly
the ones that don't say "Raspberry Pi" on them) are incredibly fast.  Combine
that with the lower power consumption of these architectures and you have
a recipe for a real shift.  Finally! 
  
 IBM still
sells mainframes, but they're generally only bought by those who have an existing
investment in hardware and software for that platform.  Ye Olde WinTel PC
is doomed to follow that path.  It might take five years, it might take twenty
years, but it will happen. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370936</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:20:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370936</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370936@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>RISC-V will win that war.  ( well not yet, but by the time it starts, it will be able to wipe the floor with the rest ).  ARM might come in 2nd, but the foundation's draconian recent license restrictions will spell the end of ARM, if its not changed.</p>
<p>But that said, i think that Intel has seen the writing on the wall, and is now involved in RISC-V.  AMD, will need to as well ( if they have not already, i am not sure )..   I dont think we will lose either of those players, unfortunately, as long as they adapt. They also will be the diving force to what i see as a market fracture, the one thing ARM has going for it to help prevent.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Dec 13 2023 01:10:03 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LadySerenaKitty">LadySerenaKitty</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>  We need a new CPU war and I do think we are headed that way.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370917</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2023 06:10:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370917</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370917@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>This is so desperately needed.  We have 1 powerful architecture that nobody can keep up with in terms of single-core purrformance (amd64) and a few architectures that are way moar logical and actually make sense in their design, but they just can't purrform like an amd64 so they don't get considered.  We need a new CPU war and I do think we are headed that way.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Dec 12 2023 13:31:52 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />The message to ARM, then, is clear: license your architecture on favorable terms or it will be replaced. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370867</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:31:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370867</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370867@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[They know what they've got.  They also know that now is the time to try to
extract as much money from it as posslble.  The era of general purpose ARM
computing is here, it's huge, but they know it won't last as long as the era
of Intel because it does not have a nonportable monopoly operating system
tied to it the way x86 did. 
  
 In other words, having ARM is not a 40 year license to print money.  Apple
and Linux have demonstrated that they can easily move entire ecosystems to
new architectures, and given the right motivation, are happy to do so. 
  
 The message to ARM, then, is clear: license your architecture on favorable
terms or it will be replaced. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370863</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Dec 2023 18:19:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370863</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370863@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Hopefully, ARM is not the end stage, but a step towards something even
     
 >more open (perhaps RISC-V).  Whatever it takes to get out of the       
 >Intel/AMD64 monoculture is a good thing.       
 >       
      
 The fund who owns the ARM license tried to sell ARM to Nvidia, then was denied
due to anti-trust concerns. Next thing they did was to announce and IPO and
take a loan using 75% of ARM as collateral.     
    
 If you don't know what this means, I will translate: They sold 10% in auction
to the stock markets and then 75% of the firm at a known price to a Swiss
bank which they might or might not rebuy.   
  
 It does not look like the owning fund gives a damn about ARM anymore. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370684</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2023 15:55:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370684</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370684@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>and of course it wont support the ones i have... grrr  </p>
<p>Soooo they still dont get to see the light of day. I need to sell them.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Dec 07 2023 16:14:43 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Well, perhaps NVIDIA has seen the light.. </p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370674</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2023 15:42:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370674</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370674@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"compatibles"  i still have nightmares from those days...</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Dec 09 2023 10:38:41 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;">That was true for the 8086 when it came out, too. Eventually everyone standardized on IBM's architecture.</span></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370673</link><pubDate>Sat, 09 Dec 2023 15:38:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370673</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370673@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >One thing I don't like about ARM is the lack of a standard firmware  
 >and standard system architecture.    
  
 That was true for the 8086 when it came out, too.  Eventually everyone standardized
on IBM's architecture. 
  
 It was also true for the 8080 when it came out before that.  Eventually everyone
standardized on Altair's architecture. 
  
 Give it time. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370570</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 21:14:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370570</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370570@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well, perhaps NVIDIA has seen the light.. </p>
<p>Being locked into ubuncrap is one reason i ditched Jetson..  ( well unless you didnt want GPU, which is the entire point of those things )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Announced this afternoon:</p>
<p>"With JetPack 6, you can now bring your own Linux kernel to the Jetson platform, enjoy a broader selection of Linux distribution choices, and upgrade your compute stack independently of the L4T BSP. These capabilities greatly enhance the flexibility and speed of development on the platform"</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370509</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 01:35:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370509</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370509@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yes device trees are a pain in the butt.  But, its not as bad as it used to be. And most manufactures do release their DTBs to the world. </p>
<p>GPU drivers for 'generic' ARM have come a long way, and most of them are opensource now.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370508</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2023 01:34:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370508</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370508@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>One thing I don't like about ARM is the lack of a standard firmware and standard system architecture.  Anykitty can make (or port) an OS to any x86/amd64 box because the firmware and system architecture is known.  This isn't true for ARM.  There's over 2 dozen firmwares for ARM boards, device/memory/bus connection are always different, it's a mess!  Sure ARM is a great contender to beat out the x86/amd64, but the lack of a standard firmware and standard architecture is a big contributor to why desktop/laptop ARM hasn't exploded in popufurity.  You can see the results of this problem by looking at the FreeBSD images - so many images for different ARM boards, and some of those boards even have the same CPU!</p>
<p>Now if NVIDIA and/or AMD would port their drivers to ARM so we could have open-source graphics, that would be great!</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Dec 04 2023 18:17:49 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">ARM is a step up. Really, anything other than Intel/AMD64 is a step up. The fact that ARM stays out of the hardware business and licenses its IP to many different manufacturers is nice. <br /><br />Microsoft branding its own ARM CPU is about the same as if it branded its own Linux. They don't own it, they don't have enough clout to E-E-E it, and it's no different than any other ARM anywhere else. <br /><br />Hopefully, ARM is not the end stage, but a step towards something even more open (perhaps RISC-V). Whatever it takes to get out of the Intel/AMD64 monoculture is a good thing. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370330</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 23:23:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370330</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370330@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I do believe RISC-V conceptually is the future. The risk ( that im predicting.. have been ) is that since there is no "base level enforcement body" like with ARM, everone will end up with their own version, and have special bits no one else has. Fracturing the market. The big players will have no incentive to be compatible with others.  OSS is a double edge sword at times.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Dec 04 2023 18:17:49 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">ARM is a step up. Really, anything other than Intel/AMD64 is a step up. The fact that ARM stays out of the hardware business and licenses its IP to many different manufacturers is nice. <br /><br />Microsoft branding its own ARM CPU is about the same as if it branded its own Linux. They don't own it, they don't have enough clout to E-E-E it, and it's no different than any other ARM anywhere else. <br /><br />Hopefully, ARM is not the end stage, but a step towards something even more open (perhaps RISC-V). Whatever it takes to get out of the Intel/AMD64 monoculture is a good thing. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099370327</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Dec 2023 23:17:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099370327</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099370327@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ARM is a step up.  Really, anything other than Intel/AMD64 is a step up. 
The fact that ARM stays out of the hardware business and licenses its IP to
many different manufacturers is nice. 
  
 Microsoft branding its own ARM CPU is about the same as if it branded its
own Linux.  They don't own it, they don't have enough clout to E-E-E it, and
it's no different than any other ARM anywhere else. 
  
 Hopefully, ARM is not the end stage, but a step towards something even more
open (perhaps RISC-V).  Whatever it takes to get out of the Intel/AMD64 monoculture
is a good thing. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099369276</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2023 00:15:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369276</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369276@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Looks like Microsoft is soon going to be adding MS branded ARM CPUs to azure.  ( not just generic ones they started using a year or so ago )</p>
<p>Not sure how i feel about that.  Other than its nice to see Intel getting kicked in the crotch. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099369210</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Nov 2023 23:16:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099369210</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099369210@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So i have mentioned it before, i have been collecting lenovo tiny's and replacing the I5 CPUs with a xeon to use in my server farm.</p>
<p>And i mentioned that i started having some weird things going on, that i attributed to power but wasn't 100% sure.  Finally found a pattern.  It seems that a couple things are going on:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Cheaper SSDs as they get larger suck more power. And at some point the power just isn't there anymore.</p>
<p>Things like headphones work..  and regular USB flash so i knew it wasn't a 'data bus issue'</p>
<p>This keyboard i bought for the one i use as a desktop, doesn't help matters any. Gamer thing, takes up 2 usb ports to run.  Really? stupid thing.  But this power suck means smaller drive limit in the desktop. ( but not servers, they can still hit 4TB if i stick with name brand )</p>
<p>Larger USB devices, was hit and miss, and until this last week i didnt see the pattern.  But i did finally. Only the drives with that funky 2 port USB3 cable fail. Even if they had a power pack to go with them, which made me question my suspicion.. These cables are where the 2nd little connector piece is to provide, guess what, extra power.  So, got a older USB2 micro, shove it into the larger side ( its the same pin out ) and lo and behold the drives work. Years and years ago had a Samsung note phone i used a micro cable with ( instead of carrying around a 2nd totally unique cable ), so i knew at least the concept was good at least.</p>
<p>Also, means i wont try to solder on m.2 sockets to add internal nvme to go along with the SATA port..  not worth the effort.  Which is too bad, would make them great CEPH boxes. A tiny m.2 to boot, and a large SSD for OSD.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Not that most of you care about the hardware here so i am mostly rambling... but figured if anyone runs across drives that dont work that use those funky usb3 cables, that might be a solution ..  I bet newer devices have even less power availble to give out to devices. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099368699</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 17:52:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368699</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368699@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Rumor there may be a Chromebook coming with the SnapdragonX chip coming in the not so distant future.   Man that will fly. it would eat my i7 pixelbook for breakfast. </p>
<p>If its not too much and has enough storage space to decently run a Linux session, i may have to buy it. That would take care of any driver issues, since the ChromeOS would have those embedded. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099368473</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 19:41:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099368473</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099368473@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Hmm when you flash a SBC, be sure you read and use the correct image. Or you waste your time ( or, kill it, if you REALLY screw up ).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Grumble. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099367972</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 18:29:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099367972</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099367972@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Unlike apple, it wont be locked down. They wont be Chromebooks but actual laptops, running windows at first. ( and perhaps desktops )  However, you wont run 'of your choice' off the bat. will take some time for things like mainline Linux kernel to support it. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Nov 01 2023 13:43:18 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Not interested if they're locked down to the factory OS. I want to run the OS of my choice like on developer boards. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099367969</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 17:43:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099367969</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099367969@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Not interested if they're locked down to the factory OS.  I want to run the
OS of my choice like on developer boards. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099367947</link><pubDate>Wed, 01 Nov 2023 13:10:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099367947</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099367947@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And related:  Qualcomms' Snapdragon X Elite that was just announced/released looks like its better ( on paper ) than Apple's just released M3.  And several companies are going to be making machines with it.. not just the one inside the walled garden. ( Acer, Asus, Dell, HP, Honor, Lenovo, Microsoft Surface, Samsung, and Mi. )</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099367780</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Oct 2023 18:34:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099367780</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099367780@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Armbian news letter "we now support  Lenovo X13s" </p>
<p>Um ok, must be something special about that one.... Go search....  oooooo ARM.. 3ghz. 512 storage.. 16g ram.. 13"    Found one at backmarket for 400 bucks.. Must... not.. hit.. order.....arrgh.  ( ill skip it i guess, i dont need another dust collector )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099367184</link><pubDate>Thu, 19 Oct 2023 15:03:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099367184</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099367184@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Im sure i bitched about it in another thread, about GoogleTV update on my tv box.  Since i dont have any stock generic android TV boxes anymore  decided to build one from one of the arm boxes i have collecting dust.( the generic boxes never get updated, so after a couple of years they are outdated and get tossed )</p>
<p>Couple of observations, most of which i had forgot from the last time i tried this, and why i ended up giving up and buying one.</p>
<p>Installing android on a ARM SBC is a real pain in the ass.  For most boards you cant just grab an image, DD it over to SD or eMMC like you can for nearly all other operating systems on them.. You have to use some freaking windows tool to write the image, and it does not work 2/3 of the time. What in the hell???</p>
<p>One of my board makers DO have an "auto flasher" you can just DD over to an SD card. Then when that boots it does magic and flashes the android image to internal eMMC. Why cant the rest? Lazy asses. But always preferred them over others anyway.</p>
<p>BUT when you do it this way, a lot of apps magically think you are on a phone and rotate the screen for you, even when the same app wont do that a dedicated TV box. I have never understood why.  You have to install a 'locker app' to prevent it as even the 'lock orientation' option in the OS wont stop it....   And several apps you have to use 3rd party stores to get them, as play store blocks generic devices for a lot of items. Neither are 'hard' to work around, just annoying.</p>
<p>And still hardware related, picked up a new remote control to use since what i have now is dedicated to the hardware i have now ( an xiaomi mi. Which was nice until GTV was installed )..  Fancy thing has a qwerty keyboard on the back..</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and no, i cant use kodi to avoid Android.   That was in the other thread, wherever its at. only option is android, or just a browser i guess but a lot more trouble dealing with a remote across the room )</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Sort of funny, i just dropped xiaomi phones this fall.. now my TV box.   </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366698</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 03:21:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099366698</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366698@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >We shouldn't be doing business with hostile/communist nations.  
 >American industry is all but dead thanks to Bill Clinton opening up  
 >trade with China.  
  
 Agreed.  Note however, that the best chips come from Taiwan.  If the mainland
chicoms make themselves enough of a nuisance, Taiwan could probably take their
whole economy out of commission simply by bombing a few dams. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366631</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 11:14:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099366631</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366631@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Which is most of the planet, including us. We are all hostile in our own way.</p>
<p>Realistically zero trade between nations isn't practical. Unless we all want to live in a cave wondering where our next meal is coming from.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Oct 10 2023 22:45:05 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=msgrhys">msgrhys</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> <span style="background-color: transparent;">We shouldn't be doing business with hostile/communist nations. American industry is all but dead thanks to Bill Clinton opening up trade with China.</span></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366612</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2023 02:45:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099366612</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366612@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Oct 10 2023 19:34:26 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>and step 2 will be banning imports.   </p>
 <br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p>We shouldn't be doing business with hostile/communist nations. American industry is all but dead thanks to Bill Clinton opening up trade with China.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366605</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 23:34:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099366605</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366605@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It will hinder development, and step 2 will be banning imports.   </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Oct 10 2023 18:32:25 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=msgrhys">msgrhys</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Oct 10 2023 18:12:38 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>And speaking of RISC-V  ... Well dammit this will set things back.  I did predict this. i was hoping i was wrong.   Calling for restrictions on RISC-V by our wonderful government.  Grr </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-china-tech-war-risc-v-chip-technology-emerges-new-battleground-2023-10-06/" target="webcit01">https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-china-tech-war-risc-v-chip-technology-emerges-new-battleground-2023-10-06/</a></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p>Well reading the article gives me the impression that the goal is to stop American companies from giving technology to Communist China, which I'm all for, assuming they don't slip something else in (and of course they will).</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366594</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:32:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099366594</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366594@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Oct 10 2023 18:12:38 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>And speaking of RISC-V  ... Well dammit this will set things back.  I did predict this. i was hoping i was wrong.   Calling for restrictions on RISC-V by our wonderful government.  Grr </p>
<p> </p>
<p><a href="https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-china-tech-war-risc-v-chip-technology-emerges-new-battleground-2023-10-06/" target="webcit01">https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-china-tech-war-risc-v-chip-technology-emerges-new-battleground-2023-10-06/</a></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p>Well reading the article gives me the impression that the goal is to stop American companies from giving technology to Communist China, which I'm all for, assuming they don't slip something else in (and of course they will).</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366591</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 22:12:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099366591</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366591@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And speaking of RISC-V  ... Well dammit this will set things back.  I did predict this. i was hoping i was wrong.   Calling for restrictions on RISC-V by our wonderful government.  Grr </p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.reuters.com/technology/us-china-tech-war-risc-v-chip-technology-emerges-new-battleground-2023-10-06/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366573</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 21:16:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: RISC-V vs Power ISA</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366573@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>RISC-V is the future. </p>
<p>Might as well get on the train early. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Oct 10 2023 16:04:52 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=msgrhys">msgrhys</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: RISC-V vs Power ISA</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I've noticed mainly two open source ISAs: RISC-V and Power ISA. Which one do you think has a better future? Which one do you think is technically better?</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366572</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 21:15:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: RISC-V vs Power ISA</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366572@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ya, it does, just not as mature as lets say X86. But its getting there, fast.  </p>
<p>Power, to be honest at this point i would not bother. I think the only people making hem now is IBM, for their own stuff.  ( and this is coming from an ex-fan )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Oct 10 2023 16:17:44 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LadySerenaKitty">LadySerenaKitty</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: Re: RISC-V vs Power ISA</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>POWER has decades of history.  rv is new and still doesn't have an established ecosystem.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366561</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 20:17:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: RISC-V vs Power ISA</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366561@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>POWER has decades of history.  rv is new and still doesn't have an established ecosystem.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Oct 10 2023 16:04:52 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=msgrhys">msgrhys</a> </span> <span class="message_subject">Subject: RISC-V vs Power ISA</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I've noticed mainly two open source ISAs: RISC-V and Power ISA. Which one do you think has a better future? Which one do you think is technically better?</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366558</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 20:04:52 -0000</pubDate><title>RISC-V vs Power ISA</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366558@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I've noticed mainly two open source ISAs: RISC-V and Power ISA. Which one do you think has a better future? Which one do you think is technically better?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366201</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2023 14:24:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099366201</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366201@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>this sort of qualifies for the scumbag room too, but i guess Intel is incompetent and now spinning Altera back off ( the FPGA company they bought about 10 years ago )    Great, id rather see them independent again, i dont trust Intel.  Now if AMD would do the same and set xilinx free again...</p>
<p>Link for reference ( ya i know, even tho i'm annoyed by the industry now, i still get and peek at the news letters.  But at least i dont pay for subscriptions and paper anymore. Baby steps. ) </p>
<p>https://www.eejournal.com/article/intel-plans-to-spin-off-fpga-group-as-an-independent-company-nine-years-after-buying-altera/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366056</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 20:48:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099366056</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366056@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>lol</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Oct 03 2023 12:05:39 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;"> I was so excited until I discovered that it was only the nameplate, not the whole panel.  :(</span></p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366036</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 17:06:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099366036</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366036@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>https://www.recycledgoods.com/dec-df03-aa-modem-vintage-dec-modem-110v/</p>
<p>I had the -AC, not the -AA.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099366028</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2023 16:05:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099366028</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099366028@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Cool.  My acoustic looks exactly like this:</p>
<p><img src="
<p>They must have made a lot of these because it's easy to find photographs of them on the web.</p>
<p>Actually it's sitting somewhere in the garage at my mom and dad's house, which I need to clean out because I want them to sell the place and move into something a couple of people who are almost 80 can actually maintain.  My dad once said that he saved the front panel of an IBM 360 and has it down there somewhere.  I was so excited until I discovered that it was only the nameplate, not the whole panel.  :(</p>
<p>Acoustic couplers will never be useful again.  But it's such a beautiful piece of history.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365904</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2023 13:39:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365904</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365904@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Another thought to add..  just ran into this today. trying to build a webcam streaming thing on an orange Pi i had.  Just bought a 60 dollar camera for it. grrrr.  ( and having library issues.. but it may not work at all according to this )</p>
<p>Walled garden hardware. NO. F-them.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Sep 30 2023 11:30:09 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />So ... Raspberry Pi 5 <br /><br />Anyone checked out the specs yet? I was having a conversation with Nurb about the ARM board he put up for me to do development on, and how I noticed that it (a NanoPi) was much faster than a Raspberry Pi. I think the RPi is both the best and worst thing to happen, since they did an amazing job bringing SBC computing to the masses in a way that wouldn't have happened otherwise; while at the same time the boards released so far haven't really been all that great. <br /><br />The 5 looks poised to change that. Faster CPU, faster video, faster I/O (much of which is due to a new custom southbridge), and it's even got one lane of PCIe to which you could attach an NVMe drive. Christopher Barnatt and Jeff Geeling both praised it in their reviews and it looks fast enough to daily drive. <br /><br />Thoughts? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365899</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:29:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365899</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365899@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not me either. </p>
<p>But i do have a perhaps 1k bubble memory module kicking around still somewhere.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Oct 01 2023 04:37:00 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=test2">test2</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>peers! which one of you is holding onto my 16k ram core module!!</p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365898</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2023 11:28:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365898</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365898@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I had one until the great purge.  Black plastic, wood grain highlights.  Served me well for many years. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Oct 01 2023 06:55:26 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Hehe. I don't have your core memory, but I might have a 300 bps acoustic coupler somewhere. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365895</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2023 10:55:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365895</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365895@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Hehe.  I don't have your core memory, but I might have a 300 bps acoustic
coupler somewhere. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365890</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2023 08:37:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365890</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365890@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>peers! which one of you is holding onto my 16k ram core module!!</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Sep 30 2023 11:25:11 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>i helped decommission two CDC 3800's, it was a grab fest to get the <br />"core" memory modules.  alas.. i was low man in the room and wasnt </blockquote>
<br />Nice. I'm so glad you're here. You're among peers. :) </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365864</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 15:45:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365864</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365864@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>RPI is still sub-par. They always trail behind the industry.  The only thing they have going for them is the ecosystem. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365861</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 15:30:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365861</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365861@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 So ... Raspberry Pi 5 
  
 Anyone checked out the specs yet?  I was having a conversation with Nurb
about the ARM board he put up for me to do development on, and how I noticed
that it (a NanoPi) was much faster than a Raspberry Pi.  I think the RPi is
both the best and worst thing to happen, since they did an amazing job bringing
SBC computing to the masses in a way that wouldn't have happened otherwise;
while at the same time the boards released so far haven't really been all
that great. 
  
 The 5 looks poised to change that.  Faster CPU, faster video, faster I/O
(much of which is due to a new custom southbridge), and it's even got one
lane of PCIe to which you could attach an NVMe drive.  Christopher Barnatt
and Jeff Geeling both praised it in their reviews and it looks fast enough
to daily drive. 
  
 Thoughts? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365860</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 15:25:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365860</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365860@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >i helped decommission two CDC 3800's, it was a grab fest to get the  
 >"core" memory modules.  alas.. i was low man in the room and wasnt  
  
 Nice.  I'm so glad you're here.  You're among peers.  :) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365854</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 12:54:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365854</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365854@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Grumble.</p>
<p>So couple of years ago i bought another 'smart' watch. After being burnt by Sony "we decided not to sell watches anymore, sorry *poof*. And before that Pebble, after holding out for a long time in the first place. Well, not really pebble i guess but that f-ing "fitbit" when they bought hem out and discontinued the entire line. "no more pebble for you, oh and that new watch you were waiting on that you wanted, that was ready to be released.? Nope.. Oh and in a year, we will shut the servers down too, so your device wont work at all"  After the pebble thing, i went with Sony 'no one is going to buy them at least'... then 6 months later... doh.   Being burnt twice, i went back to only real watches. Should have known better.</p>
<p>Fast forward several years, and i really only got it as my mother was sick, so i would not miss a call while at work in a meeting or something. Worked ok, got used to it. and kept wearing it.</p>
<p>Year ago it started acting funny. wouldn't turn on after a charge when i had let it die by accident. I did their 'magic power reset' and it worked. moved on.  Today decided to erase it and pair to the new phone. One of the things it *forces* you to do before you can use it is to go they every freaking feature it has, which i had forgot how annoying it was.... "swipe left, right, left up down wiggle,wiggle, touch touch touch, swipe 20 more times"   got to where it says push buttons "push bottom .. bla bla..  now push top button".. nothing... arrgh</p>
<p>Button is broke. now i know why had problems last year.  BUT if i dont push the dammed button every time i touch it "press the button, jerk" pops up on the screen ( ok, not jerk, but you get the idea )</p>
<p>How frustrating. </p>
<p>And ya, took it out back and hosed it down the best i could with contact cleaner. But no. Button is toast.  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365843</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 06:21:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365843</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365843@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>i helped decommission two CDC 3800's, it was a grab fest to get the "core" memory modules.  alas.. i was low man in the room and wasnt able to grab one.  They were the full assembly - 64 modules of 16x16 wire matrix grids with cute teensy ferrite cores at each wire intersection. those turds were heavy. they looked like lamp bases you'd find in the living room. (the newly released album The Wall playing in the background) good demolition music.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365832</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2023 04:06:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365832</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365832@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >ya, i was there when they wrote the emulators and shut down the wafer  
 >fabs. then moved onto way more fun stuff. wireless- ground floor.  
  
 Cool!  I studied at Kutztown and we had an A-9 at the time (1988-1993). 
And I did my internship at AT&T Microelectronics over in Reading.  All those
plants are gone now.  But the one in Breinigsville (the old Solid State Technology
Center) is now occupied by the company I work for, we have a data center there.
 Total coincidence many years later. 
  
 The old Burroughs systems had a really neat architecture, but like IBM it
was a lousy experience due to their non-teletype terminals. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365821</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 23:45:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365821</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365821@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>We still have a 'real' mainframe on site.  Not sure what model/revision, but it is IBM.   Its going to be retired soon. ( that is what they said 10 years ago .... )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365820</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 23:30:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365820</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365820@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>ya, i was there when they wrote the emulators and shut down the wafer fabs. then moved onto way more fun stuff. wireless- ground floor. sneaky stuff.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365737</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2023 03:10:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365737</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365737@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >i still have my face mask and bunny shoes from when i worked in a  
 >class 10 clean room making mainframe CPUs. oh, ya... i still have a  
 >few of those CPU's hiding about. (A10, A15, A17)  
  
 Were those the old Burroughs mainframes?  Are you from Pennsylvania?  Kannst
du micka fange? 
  
 Oh, those cranky old beasts!  I think they're just emulated now and running
on bog standard AMD64 machines. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099365676</link><pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2023 13:49:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099365676</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099365676@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Sort of a rant too, but not exactly.</p>
<p>As i have mentioned before , i have been collecting those little Lenovo M93 tinys as for the cost they are great.  And you can replace the i5 CPU with a xeon. Normally in this market space, the CPU is soldered down.  They work great as s small PVE farm.  they also make decent dektops if you dont game ( onboard GPU ). 3 video ports, BT/Wifi, bla bla.  and as it sounds, tiny... </p>
<p>I do wish they could support more than 16gb ram. But i understand why.  </p>
<p>What i DONT understand... They have traces for 2 m.2 sockets on the board, one can be used for storage the other i think is a 2nd network, but didnt bother to populate either. So unless you want to dig into it and do some surface mount work you are stuck with one drive.  They did the hard work.. why didnt they freaking put the socket and pull-up resistors on? So they raise the price a buck or 2, no one would even notice the cost... I would LOVE to have it boot off m.2 then use the SSD for storage only.  Be perfect for native Ceph machines, but you cant boot off your storage device, so you need that extra device.   But im not really in the mood to try add them. ( now, if they could take more ram, i might... )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099364825</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2023 21:24:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099364825</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099364825@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Perhaps 20 years ago we had an app that was running that one of the BUs relied on for monthly reports/billing/etc ( some were reports that go to the Feds, honestly dont remember all the details now. been too long ).  One day we got a phone call "hey our stuff isn't working". </p>
<p>Wasn't a server in the data center, so used all sort of odd resource to track it down to a contractors desk. He left 2 months prior. They came and recycled his machine. By the time we tracked the actual box down, it was on another persons desk by then. Reloaded.</p>
<p>i found a CD "code backup' in a drawer that was taken just before he went live, almost a year prior.  "sorry folks all your stuff is gone"</p>
<p>We clamped down on our polices after that :) </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Similar:  App i was hired to support at the same place. Tracked the hardware down on my 3rd or 4th day. Found it running on a desktop PC, laying on floor at the the bottom of a server rack. At least it was in the server room and they knew about it..</p>
<p>Job before that, guy i was replacing had been gone 2 months " the computer stuff is in the room is over there, here are the keys, i think he left some passwords in there, and his phone number, if you need to call him. good luck".  First task.. backups..   there were not any. ( had been running a DB prune on the tapes for months.. no actual data. ."ok, everyone leave me alone for a little, this is really important"</p>
<p>Job before that 2nd or 3rd day: "our stuff crashed come help" ( remote site ).  "sure, we are on our way"  got there, ok where are the backups. There was  brand new box unopened of tape sitting beside the server. " Um, ok, where the tapes you swap out every night ?" "we have to do that? How do you do that, he never told us that.. ( my predecessor, who also mis-labeled a kvm at another site.. I took a branch down like that..  my first time there at that location, wrong machine.. poof.) "well with luck we might.. oh.. tapes broke. been broke for months.. "       somehow i managed to boot the original 1/2 dead drive on a set of Linux disk i brought ( it was Windows NT, it was a novell shop and i was hired as, go figure, the windows guy...of all things ) and copy off the database and important files.  took me until like 2am but i saved the place from a disaster.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099364822</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2023 20:53:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099364822</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099364822@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >I have the Apple 250MB hard drive that shipped with my Quadra  
 >660av.  I don't use it, but it is an artifact.  
  
 I remember back in college finding a discarded Quadra 840av in a corner of
the EE department.  Made an excellent NetBSD machine.  I used it that way
for the better part of a year before it just.. disappeared one day.  Still
not sure what happened to it.  Somebody probably tossed it because it didn't
come up to the right clicky-clicky screen they were expecting. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099364473</link><pubDate>Fri, 22 Sep 2023 05:25:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099364473</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099364473@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>i still have my face mask and bunny shoes from when i worked in a class 10 clean room making mainframe CPUs. oh, ya... i still have a few of those CPU's hiding about. (A10, A15, A17)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099364417</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 20:35:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099364417</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099364417@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Somewhere i have a disk from a mainframe. ( or at least i did ).</p>
<p>That was a funny story. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Sep 20 2023 22:32:57 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">I've actually extracted and kept the platters from a couple of old disks just for the off chance that some day I can show some whippersnapper and go "back in my day we used to store data on tiny particles of rust!" </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099364354</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 15:44:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099364354</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099364354@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have the Apple 250MB hard drive that shipped with my Quadra 660av.  I don't use it, but it is an artifact.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099364323</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 14:08:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099364323</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099364323@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I had an ST225 still around, for posterity.  I'm not sure what happened to
it.  Back when you could still get some life out of a used drive. 
 That, and ST4038, were mainstays of the yearly Hard Diskus throw competition
around here.  Never a shortage of dead drives for the competition. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099364237</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 02:32:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099364237</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099364237@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >sticks!  When I was their age a hard disk drive was the size and weight
 
 >of a brick and had its own LED sticking out the front of the machine!  

 >   
  
 I've actually extracted and kept the platters from a couple of old disks
just for the off chance that some day I can show some whippersnapper and go
"back in my day we used to store data on tiny particles of rust!" 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099364233</link><pubDate>Thu, 21 Sep 2023 02:26:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099364233</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099364233@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Sounds plausible, but the old drives were SSD as well, and the one spinny
disk is still there.  The difference in current draw is negligible, unless
a couple of eight year old Intel SSDs really drew that much. 
  
 I didn't know about the NVMe to SATA LED signaling.  That's pretty sad. 
Although with NVMe we are probably approaching the end of the era of even
having an HDD LED at all.  These damn kids and their M.2 sticks!  When I was
their age a hard disk drive was the size and weight of a brick and had its
own LED sticking out the front of the machine! 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099363895</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 11:33:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099363895</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099363895@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>My vote too.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Sep 18 2023 23:28:44 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LadySerenaKitty">LadySerenaKitty</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">Most likely, the drives were drawing a bit too much current for the LED to light up, and now that you're on SSD you have some current leftover to not starve the light.</span></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy; font-size: 12px; display: inline !important;"> </span></div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099363852</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 03:28:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099363852</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099363852@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>No!  So the controller is responsible for the activity light.  On NVMe systems, the NVMe controller signals the SATA controller to turn the light on and off, because of course the PCIe bus should be used for such shenanigans. /s</p>
<p>Most likely, the drives were drawing a bit too much current for the LED to light up, and now that you're on SSD you have some current leftover to not starve the light.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Sep 18 2023 23:20:10 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />It's the most curious thing. <br /><br />[ Long and rambling story about various different SSD and Spinnydrives in my main computer ] <br /><br />With the old drives, the front panel LED never lit, even when I was using the new drive I added later. <br /><br />Now that the old drives are gone and there's only the new one (plus an old spinnyrust for backups of my machines up at the data center), the front panel LED glows red during disk activity. <br /><br />Same machine, same motherboard, same operating system. These are all SATA drives because I am not cool enough for NVMe yet. What gives? Is there such a thing as a bug on an old disk firmware that would stop all drives from being able to light the controller's LED? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099363847</link><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 03:20:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099363847</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099363847@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 It's the most curious thing. 
  
 [ Long and rambling story about various different SSD and Spinnydrives in
my main computer ] 
  
 With the old drives, the front panel LED never lit, even when I was using
the new drive I added later. 
  
 Now that the old drives are gone and there's only the new one (plus an old
spinnyrust for backups of my machines up at the data center), the front panel
LED glows red during disk activity. 
  
 Same machine, same motherboard, same operating system.  These are all SATA
drives because I am not cool enough for NVMe yet.  What gives?  Is there such
a thing as a bug on an old disk firmware that would stop all drives from being
able to light the controller's LED? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099356614</link><pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2023 02:47:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099356614</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099356614@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >From bios with NO drive it still shows older boot options and i dont  
 >see a way to clear/delete them.  ( ami bios ). Soooo i assume its  
  
 `efibootmgr` is your friend. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099356495</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2023 16:40:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099356495</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099356495@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>VisionFive v2.. now has GPU drivers.. </p>
<p>took long enough..</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099356065</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 18:30:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099356065</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099356065@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have yet to order those ARM modules i was talking about creating a ceph cluster out of.</p>
<p>lazy.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Aug 30 2023 01:51:45 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LadySerenaKitty">LadySerenaKitty</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Yesterday my $1009.84 PCIe4 card arrived.  Microchip SmartHBA 1200-32i.  Directly attaches up to 32 SAS/SATA drives, and with additional hardware, can attach up to 1024 of them.  The single most expensive part of my storage server build is here.</p>
<p><a href="https://twitter.com/LadySerenaKitty/status/1696594228430709162" target="webcit01">https://twitter.com/LadySerenaKitty/status/1696594228430709162</a></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099356054</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 17:51:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099356054</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099356054@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yesterday my $1009.84 PCIe4 card arrived.  Microchip SmartHBA 1200-32i.  Directly attaches up to 32 SAS/SATA drives, and with additional hardware, can attach up to 1024 of them.  The single most expensive part of my storage server build is here.</p>
<p><a title="https://twitter.com/LadySerenaKitty/status/1696594228430709162" href="https://twitter.com/LadySerenaKitty/status/1696594228430709162" target="_blank">https://twitter.com/LadySerenaKitty/status/1696594228430709162</a></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099356046</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2023 16:15:11 -0000</pubDate><title>New consumer RISC-V products</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099356046@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>This got lost in the last DB crash. these people are tempting me.. </p>
<p>https://www.cnx-software.com/2023/08/28/sipeed-unveils-risc-v-tablet-portable-linux-console-and-cluster/?amp=1</p>
<p> </p>
<p>And pine 64 has their damned tablet..</p>
<p>https://pine64.com/product/pinetab-v-10-1-8gb-128gb-risc-v-based-linux-tablet-with-detached-backlit-keyboard/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099355114</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Aug 2023 20:50:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099355114</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099355114@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>LoL...  Sid update. .new kernel. now it wont boot again.   So frustrating. you have to laugh.. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And into the closet it goes before i start making .223 sized holes in it. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099353722</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2023 22:29:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099353722</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099353722@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And to continue to saga on that POS box.. </p>
<p>Since the POS OS was working, i tried installing Debian again ( via FAI, to minimize any network activity ) .  Stupid thing installed fine, no grub errors.  Updated the kernel to 6.4.0  as short of compiling it my self i cant go higher with Debian at the moment.  And while i can compile of course, i doubt he box would hold up. </p>
<p>For the most part it works, as long as i dont stress it.  So, its still not 100% there yet, but better then it was with 5.x kernel. ( and of course 6.1.x no boot )</p>
<p>Ill keep tracking what version Sid is up to, and when it hits 5, ill update. See if its finally stable.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Meanwhile as mentioned above, decided to eat my own dog food and no more x86 desktops for me.  AI server, still needs X86 due to GPU needs as there is no way im going to be able to afford that new NVIDIA chip for what is just a 'hobby/toy'.  Used to have web/file/etc on ARM.  will end up moving that stuff back later this fall..   My Chromebooks are ARM, and will need to dig out my Pinebook, which is an RK3399. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099353720</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2023 22:15:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099353720</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099353720@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ill take 2, please.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"<span style="color: #171717; font-family: 'Proxima Nova', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Nvidia’s GH200 has the same GPU as the H100, Nvidia’s current highest-end AI chip, but pairs it with 141 gigabytes of cutting-edge memory, as well as a 72-core ARM central processor."</span></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099353085</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:28:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099353085</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099353085@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>You would think.  But not this one.   I can disable them but not remove them. it seems to keep the last 4.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Aug 11 2023 03:26:00 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>From bios with NO drive it still shows older boot options and i dont <br />see a way to clear/delete them.  ( ami bios ). Soooo i assume its <br />storing some boot info somewhere in flash on the board and that is <br />hosing me.     Any one have any idea how to clear this sort of <br />thing?  ( if its flash , even pulling the battery, which is a total <br />pain with this thing wont work ) </blockquote>
<br />The UEFI configuration menu is likely to have an option to remove old boot options. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099353083</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:26:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099353083</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099353083@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >From bios with NO drive it still shows older boot options and i dont  
 >see a way to clear/delete them.  ( ami bios ). Soooo i assume its  
 >storing some boot info somewhere in flash on the board and that is  
 >hosing me.     Any one have any idea how to clear this sort of  
 >thing?  ( if its flash , even pulling the battery, which is a total  
 >pain with this thing wont work )   
  
 The UEFI configuration menu is likely to have an option to remove old boot
options. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099353080</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 19:15:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099353080</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099353080@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>*(Y)*&amp;#$</p>
<p>Locked up doing data transfer tests.  So not really any better.  </p>
<p>Sigh. 400 dollar door stop.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099353069</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:43:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099353069</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099353069@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Normally the only reason i even care about kernel version is due to built in driver support. This is the first time i have ever had this sort of problem.   </p>
<p>Reading some today, looks i should be able to get network setup tonight. If so, ill put it thru its paces, see if its stable now. I'm crossing my fingers. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Oh, and i dont trust Ubuntu.. :)  I have been using Debian pretty much since day 1 ( well that and armbian, which is pretty close ).  Started with Boot/Root ( remember that? tho , it wasn't really a 'distribution' in the traditional sense )  then SLS, went to Yggradsisl for a bit due to their handling of X.org, Redhat in the EARLY days since they were 'the thing'.. ( floppy .. ) but Debian was it once it was here. Never looked back.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Aug 11 2023 11:25:01 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />I'm still running 5.15 LTS branch kernels. The moment ubuntu released their 5.19, it broke stuff, so I removed the HWE stack and haven't gone back. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099353036</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 15:25:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099353036</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099353036@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I'm still running 5.15 LTS branch kernels. The moment ubuntu released their
5.19, it broke stuff, so I removed the HWE stack and haven't gone back. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099352865</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2023 01:13:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352865</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352865@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Saw that arch is at 6.4.9 now..  so figured id try that. it booted, installer defaulted to 'systemd-boot' not grub. Figured what the hell..  It installed, no complaint this time.</p>
<p>Also it downloaded all its files from the network. something lower kernels would freeze up doing. </p>
<p>Rebooted. Logged in... reboot. rinse repeat a couple of times.. it worked.. whoohoo a good sign</p>
<p>Move it up on the shelf. remove monitor keyboard, Power on...  NO freaking network..   Card is seen using 'ip' , so i guess it doesn't configure network by default ( really? who's dumb idea is this? ) so have to read up on how Arch does networking.</p>
<p>But this is promising.. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099352830</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 20:56:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352830</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352830@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yes live USBs work ( as do dedicated installers, up to the point of writing grub )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Aug 09 2023 08:16:20 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Any chance you can get into a live USB? You could even put an old kernel on it if you have to. If you can make it into Linux you might be able to muck with the flash from there. Or the efivars. They might even be the same. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099352748</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2023 00:16:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352748</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352748@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Any chance you can get into a live USB?  You could even put an old kernel
on it if you have to.  If you can make it into Linux you might be able to
muck with the flash from there.  Or the efivars.  They might even be the same.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099352701</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2023 15:59:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352701</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352701@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So i have my first true 100% uefi bios machine.  </p>
<p>Had some stuff installed. its a unstable POS. ( long story i have told, others have same problem with that series, older 5.x kernels work better than new but still unreliable. 6.1 wont even boot..... go figure ).  Ran across a Linux disro that has kernel 6.4.8 out of the box ( almost bleeding edge ) and thought id try it.  It seemed to actually work, tho it sucks as a distro.  But since it worked i installed it from its live iso to m.2</p>
<p>Thought id try to do a manual kernel upgrade so put Debian back on, or at least tried. to ... now it wont write the grub stuff so i get a no-boot situation. Stability issues it DID just fine before on installs. "executing grub dummy fail" i what i get  . Look around online, its due to left over stuff on the drive.  Ok, that makes sense. Manually erase the m.2.. same problem. New drive. same problem</p>
<p>From bios with NO drive it still shows older boot options and i dont see a way to clear/delete them.  ( ami bios ). Soooo i assume its storing some boot info somewhere in flash on the board and that is hosing me.     Any one have any idea how to clear this sort of thing?  ( if its flash , even pulling the battery, which is a total pain with this thing wont work )</p>
<p>Been looking online, but its like a needle in a haystack.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099352021</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 18:14:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352021</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352021@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Forgot the Timex 2068s too.   couple of those</p>
<p>Just too much stuff to remember. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099352020</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 18:04:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352020</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352020@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The retro purge was many years ago, so its all gone, other than an Epson PX8 and a Newton.</p>
<p>Even my old calculators are gone now.</p>
<p>But it was a variety, Off the top of my head</p>
<ul>
<li>Apple ][+</li>
<li>Apple ][e</li>
<li>Apple ][c</li>
<li>Mac Portable ( and who the hell designs a laptop that *requires* the battery... )</li>
<li>Early power PC ( i forget model )</li>
<li>M100 ( or whatever the original mac was )</li>
<li>Lombard G3</li>
<li>TRS 80 Mdl II ( with drive, printer, bla bla )</li>
<li>TRS 80 Mdl iii</li>
<li>TRS 80 microcolor ( 2 of them.  only one was originally mine )</li>
<li>Tandy PC-8</li>
<li>Tandy A102 ( i think.. pretty sure it was not a 100 )</li>
<li>Amiga 500 ( i think, might have been a 600.. )</li>
<li>Atari ST ( 512 upgraded to 4mb . was my daily driver for a LONG time ). My first ST i killed doing a memory upgrade.</li>
<li>Atari 1200xl</li>
<li>Atari 130xe</li>
<li>Would have killed for a STBook.. or perhaps a Falcon..but wanted a Book sooooo bad </li>
<li>Sinclair QL</li>
<li>Couple of Timex 1000s ( wait i still have one of those in the closet in the box )</li>
<li>Osborne one</li>
<li>Kaypro II ( this missed the great purge but left last summer )</li>
<li>Ultra Sparc something or other.. ( forget model )</li>
<li>Aquarius </li>
<li>Stuff im forgetting</li>
</ul>
<div>all sorts of accessories for the above..</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Several HP calculators. .. 32e, 41c, 12c, couple of 48's ( ya i know not really retro )</div>
<div>several handhelds, Palm pilots ( a TX was daily driver for a long time ) and a few others i totally forget their names now, one ran linux out of the box. </div>
<div> </div>
<div>Semi retro:</div>
<div>One of those Compaq lugables with the florescent screen</div>
<div> </div>
<div>You can imagine the shelves .. i put wire rack shelves up to display them.</div>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Aug 01 2023 01:04:32 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LadySerenaKitty">LadySerenaKitty</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>What kinda vintage goodies?</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099352016</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 17:04:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352016</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352016@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>What kinda vintage goodies?</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Aug 01 2023 10:37:59 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>From another discussion going on..  man i have too much hardware around here collecting dust.  ( some upgraded and kept the original 'just in case' , some for projects that never happened. some 'ooooo, i want that' )</p>
<p>Years ago i had a retro collection ( kept every device i used.. very few were purchased later for the collection ) over 100 machines.   Took up 1/2 my garage. Unlike that this new stuff is so small you hardly notice and its easy to get in over your head and not even notice.</p>
<p>Really need to stop.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099352007</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Aug 2023 14:37:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099352007</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099352007@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>From another discussion going on..  man i have too much hardware around here collecting dust.  ( some upgraded and kept the original 'just in case' , some for projects that never happened. some 'ooooo, i want that' )</p>
<p>Years ago i had a retro collection ( kept every device i used.. very few were purchased later for the collection ) over 100 machines.   Took up 1/2 my garage. Unlike that this new stuff is so small you hardly notice and its easy to get in over your head and not even notice.</p>
<p>Really need to stop.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099346707</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2023 12:13:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099346707</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099346707@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>This could go in a lot of rooms..  so i just randomly picked the first one that i observed  ( pun intended )</p>
<p>Seems Iran announced a single board quantum computer "the first product of the quantum processing algorithm"  ( whatever the F that means .. lol  ).  Turns out its a consumer level FPGA board..  They didnt even cover the logo .. morons . lol. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.iranintl.com/en/202306086480</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099346491</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 22:44:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099346491</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099346491@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>of course far future may end up we 'serfs' dont get compute engines .. everything is a terminal</p>
<p>( almost there now, in effect with those damned phones )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099346486</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 22:05:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099346486</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099346486@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>the future is GPU/TPU/NPU</p>
<p>CPU will just end up being a dumb traffic cop and it wont matter what it is, or what it runs. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099346484</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2023 21:31:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099346484</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099346484@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Today I'm thinking about old and new architectures, for no particular reason.

  
 I learned that "virtual 8086 mode" was discontinued on the AMD64 architecture
when running in 64-bit long mode.    It has not been discontinued, however,
when the chip is running in 32-bit protected mode.  As we know, the virtual
8086 mode was added to the 80386 by Intel as a crutch to help newer operating
systems run MS-DOS applications.  It's their earliest form of hardware virtualization,
really. 
  
 The absence of this feature in 64-bit long mode is likely to be why support
for not only MS-DOS applications, but also Win16 applications, was discontinued
on 64-bit Windows.  Meanwhile, other operating systems start up in one mode
and stay there. 
  
 I'd like to see AMD and Intel get more aggressive about dropping some backward
compatibility.  You can run 16-bit software and 32-bit software on virtual
machines.  As long as those modes are still supported in virtualized guests,
all processors going forward should boot in 64-bit mode and stay there.  That
means no legacy BIOS support, no booting 16-bit or 32-bit operating systems
onto the bare metal, and you can get rid of a few million transistors. 
  
 It's time.  Do it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099345416</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2023 21:07:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099345416</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099345416@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Nope not that either. its a kernel issue. Going back to 5x seems to have fixed it.   ( tried a usbC network. crash.. so it clearly wasn't drivers or the network hardware )</p>
<p>Ran across a few post with similar issues after i backdated the install just to see what it would do and there are some parameters to be passed via grub that might fix it for 6.x   Will have to try that tomorow. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099345402</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2023 18:58:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099345402</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099345402@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Experimenting some more, it may actually be the Ethernet port. I shoved in one of my 'headless auto server installers' and didnt bother putting in keyboard or lan.   It installed. Have it now running memtest off that install, its been running for 30 mins straight. no errors, no freeze, cpu temp is fine.</p>
<p>Going to dig out a full install ISO and keep the cord out once im done in the kitchen ( gotta make the bread :) ).  See if that works.</p>
<p>*IF* that is the problem i can live with WiFi for its intended use.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Jun 04 2023 02:34:22 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">For stuff like that I have used Linux's netconsole to send kernel messages to another machine. Just use netcat to receive on the appropriate UDP port, and now you get to see what sort of fire and mayhem the kernel is complaining about while your local machine is frozen (or half frozen and dying a horrible death, by the sound of it). <br /><br />If I had to put money on it, sounds like you can't create new processes once you're in this state. Maybe forks are failing because the kernel can't page in more mwmory for some reason? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099345396</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2023 18:34:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099345396</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099345396@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[For stuff like that I have used Linux's netconsole to send kernel messages
to another machine. Just use netcat to receive on the appropriate UDP port,
and now you get to see what sort of fire and mayhem the kernel is complaining
about while your local machine is frozen (or half frozen and dying a horrible
death, by the sound of it). 
  
 If I had to put money on it, sounds like you can't create new processes once
you're in this state. Maybe forks are failing because the kernel can't page
in more mwmory for some reason? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099345360</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jun 2023 13:06:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099345360</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099345360@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well this is a new one. </p>
<p>New PC.</p>
<p>Runs fine for a while, ( random time, doing same thing, so not heat related ) then 'freezes', but doesn't. The running process to install freezes, but desktop isn't frozen.  Can still launch a 2nd tab in the terminal emulator.  Cant launch a new application in it as it freezes after you type, or use the menu...  Really weird.  </p>
<p>Im hoping its slower ram.  Bought a barebone as i have ram and drives out my ears. Seems i have DDR4 2400 ram, it wants 3200...   I hope that is all it is.  Send it back is an expensive pain in the neck.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have seen processes freeze before, and of course total system freezes but never this strangeness. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099344205</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 May 2023 18:52:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099344205</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099344205@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Decided to finally upgrade my desktop from an old Xeon E3-1275L v3  to a I7 1260P.  ( still lower power requirements. no need to burn electricity considering i'm not a gamer. and my Stable Diffusion box burns enough power as it is )  Will be here in a week or 2... I do hope i see a difference and didnt just burn the cash.   </p>
<p>I almost sprung for an I9..  but i try not to go overboard normally, and i like to conserve energy. Not that im turning green on you all.. but means it runs cooler, so lasts longer and less power $$.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and im still annoyed from losing $ on that Tesla GPU for the AI server.. grr )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099339130</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 May 2023 15:17:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099339130</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099339130@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well that F-ed up ARM board i had waited on for a year to arrive..  it made a round trip from here to china and back in under a month.</p>
<p>They replaced the defective power IC. Booted first attempt.  Frustrating.  But, its working now.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099338195</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Apr 2023 14:17:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099338195</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099338195@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>and i ordered the wrong power transformer for something..  ( amazon, 'order another' button but forgot i had ordered a similar one for an odd-ball case that was NOT the same plug.. )</p>
<p>geesh. not that either were enough money to really care about, its just frustrating.. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And then you have shoes... 'driving moc'  show up as 'steel toe work boots'. Wrong leather too so assumed just a total mistake, send it back, order anther. Check status " work boots" again.. wtf.. the 'store' does not list them correctly..      ( tho the 2nd pair did have the correct leather..  but no, i cant wear steel toe even if i wanted to )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( ya borderline rant.. but it was related to the CPU thread.. no pun intended :) )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099338005</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Apr 2023 22:40:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099338005</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099338005@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So a Xeon <span style="color: #222222; font-family: 'Open Sans', Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif, SimSun; font-size: 14px;"> </span><span style="color: #222222; font-family: 'Open Sans', Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif, SimSun; font-size: 14px;">E3-1275LV3 is not the same as a Xeon </span><span style="color: #222222; font-family: 'Open Sans', Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif, SimSun; font-size: 14px;">E3-1275 E3</span><span style="color: #222222; font-family: 'Open Sans', Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif, SimSun; font-size: 14px;"> </span></p>
<p>Sigh. Burn $ like it comes on trees.</p>
<p>( but to be honest. i thought it said the same i guess i cant rea..  now i have a useless, to me, cpu in a drawer )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099337568</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 16:15:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099337568</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099337568@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yup</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Apr 25 2023 10:40:41 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">So the GPU is essentially a massively parallel compute unit optimized for calculations but without all the trimmings and trappings of a general purpose CPU? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099337550</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:40:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099337550</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099337550@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Tho i have called them video cards a few times, technically they are  
 >not. No video ports or support to produce video. Only GPU.   
  
 In the desktop hosting (VDI) world there are setups that can use a GPU in
the server to accelerate the remote client's display.  I think it can even
be shared between multiple users.  As far as I can tell it only supports a
small number of specific GPU types, so I guess they're not just making OpenGL
or DirectX calls the way a single-user operating system would. 
  
 So the GPU is essentially a massively parallel compute unit optimized for
calculations but without all the trimmings and trappings of a general purpose
CPU?  That sounds like ... something other than what the end state will be.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099337545</link><pubDate>Tue, 25 Apr 2023 14:28:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099337545</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099337545@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>FedEx just delivered a 24gb NVIDIA Tesla GPU.</p>
<p>ya, i'm stupid.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099337166</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Apr 2023 19:22:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099337166</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099337166@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>unsure the details yet but a friend of mine just came home with 3 fairly new 3D printers "i found these in the trash"</p>
<p>That is like stories of people seeing Altairs and such on the curb for trash day..   i never see stuff like that.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099336816</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 16:51:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099336816</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099336816@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<p>Tho i have called them video cards a few times, technically they are not. No video ports or support to produce video. Only GPU.</p>
<p>Found some lower end referb 24gb titans for a really decent price.. but i dont think my motherboard can handle them, and im not going to start spending more on motherboards and stuff too.  hobby is not worth that much to me.. Already spent more than i should have. </p>
<p>Reason it works so well is not that its a 'graphics processor' its a parallel targeted compute module that does math really fast, on several thousand cores. Just happens to also do well for computing graphics too, so was used in them traditionally.. It wont do well with general stuff and moving bits around, but just doing general math, yes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Quick comparison of what i have, running for stable diffusion ( images ) </p>
<ul>
<li>Xeon 12 core. Takes 35 minutes. </li>
<li>Add a 4gb video card to the mix and it drops it to 3 minutes</li>
<li>Swapped it out with an older 12gb video card. Now its 15 seconds. </li>
</ul>
<div>I wold imagine a 24 gb card would not do too much for images. I think i hit the sweet spot. However, for Chat bot style processing, it depends on the size of the model. If it can all fit it into vram, then it flies and can type faster than i can .. if not, it might take a minute or two to process.  No GPU, could take 15..  So adding more vram would still help as i could use larger models and keep the speed up.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>A100's have 80gb and tons more compute units..</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Of course ASIC devices like NPU/TPU will eventually eat into the GPU superiority.  Much like they did for crypto. Once you move to a device that is specifically designed to do one thing, prices drop, performance increases.  I have a couple of those and they are scary fast, for what they are designed for.</div>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Apr 22 2023 12:32:00 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>Man, wish i had a couple of A100s.... </blockquote>
<br />What's an A100? A search says maybe it's a graphics card? Or a van from the 1970's :) <br /><br />Oh, I see ... people are using Nvidia A100 as high-density compute for "AI" workloads. <br /><br />I have to admit I don't really understand the whole "compute on GPU" thing. <br />What is it about a graphics coprocessor that couldn't be done better by some sort of high-density main CPU? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099336803</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Apr 2023 16:32:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099336803</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099336803@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Man, wish i had a couple of A100s....  
  
 What's an A100?  A search says maybe it's a graphics card?  Or a van from
the 1970's  :) 
  
 Oh, I see ... people are using Nvidia A100 as high-density compute for "AI"
workloads. 
  
 I have to admit I don't really understand the whole "compute on GPU" thing.
 What is it about a graphics coprocessor that couldn't be done better by some
sort of high-density main CPU? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099334112</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:33:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099334112</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099334112@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2023-04-11 12:17 from Nurb432       
 >Real men dont shave :)       
 >      
      
 Exactly. They have the horses do it for them XD :P     
    
 Now seriously, when I shave I confuse my horses. They try to grab my beard
and get sad because it is not there.   
  
 Incidentaly, I have a picture of one of my darlings as a desktop wallpaper
here and you made me miss them all so much. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099334109</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 16:17:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099334109</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099334109@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Real men dont shave :) </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099334102</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 15:49:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099334102</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099334102@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2023-04-10 18:49 from zelgomer   
 >Why can't you lazy bums just shave with a razor? Is it really so much  

 >trouble to just drag a piece of metal across your face?   
 >   
 >  
  
 Real men have their horses kiss their beard off (because a horse's idea of
a kiss involves intensive use of teeth). 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099334011</link><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 22:49:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099334011</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099334011@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Why can't you lazy bums just shave with a razor? Is it really so much trouble
to just drag a piece of metal across your face? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099333781</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Apr 2023 00:50:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099333781</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099333781@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Man, wish i had a couple of A100s....</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099333042</link><pubDate>Wed, 05 Apr 2023 13:13:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099333042</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099333042@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >I'm tired of things that only run on batteries. And it's worse when  
  
 Yeah.  That's the direction electric shavers seem to have taken.  Mine won't
even run at all when it's plugged in.  You're either charging or discharging
the battery, never both at the same time.  Built to the lowest possible price
point, I guess.  I miss the old ones with little AC motors that you really
knew they were working. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099330866</link><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 18:37:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099330866</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099330866@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not that it matters much to anyone but me...  but my v2 RISCv board that was foobar, its replacement showed up today.  Booted first try. yay!</p>
<p>Sending back the hosed RK3588 board. they finally offered to take it back. i think anyway, as i'm going to see how much the shipping is this afternoon.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099326560</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 19:47:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099326560</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099326560@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh, they are smart enough.  Its by design so you have to replace it, and not due to incompetence.</p>
<p>So many things we have today could last for extended time and do just fine, but then they wont get their constant 'upgrade' business..  so gotta make stuff die.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Feb 15 2023 01:45:24 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=nonservator">nonservator</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I'm tired of things that only run on batteries. And it's worse when the idiots who design them aren't smart enough to make it so leaving it plugged in doesn't eventually destroy the battery and the entire device.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099326551</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 18:45:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099326551</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099326551@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I'm tired of things that only run on batteries. And it's worse when the idiots who design them aren't smart enough to make it so leaving it plugged in doesn't eventually destroy the battery and the entire device.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099326544</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:58:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099326544</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099326544@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh i agree, but asking *IF* is lame :)</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Feb 15 2023 12:35:36 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LadySerenaKitty">LadySerenaKitty</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<p>Also, you'd be surprised how many people don't read the documentation for things.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099326541</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 17:35:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099326541</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099326541@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Devices really don't care what the source of electrons is.</p>
<p>Also, you'd be surprised how many people don't read the documentation for things.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Feb 15 2023 07:19:25 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>On a SBC forum last night: " can i run this on a battery "</p>
<p>I think they need a new hobby.</p>
<p>"how much power does this draw so i can figure out what size battery i will need for the time i want it to run" i woudl be ok with ( even tho its in the documents.. ) but "can it" ? Really?</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099326497</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 12:19:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099326497</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099326497@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>On a SBC forum last night: " can i run this on a battery "</p>
<p>I think they need a new hobby.</p>
<p>"how much power does this draw so i can figure out what size battery i will need for the time i want it to run" i woudl be ok with ( even tho its in the documents.. ) but "can it" ? Really?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099326052</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2023 13:21:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099326052</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099326052@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>since i got frustrated with that arm board i keep bitching about that i waited a year for... Bought an S series from another vendor ( orange pi ). In theory the only difference from my PoS board is i/o ( not as much on an S ).     This had enough i/o for a couple of usb ports, and a m.2 for storage ( but not enough for onboard WiFi )</p>
<p>While the GPU drivers are still a bit flaky ( that will correct over time ) the damned thing flies....  doing some basic perf checks it is equal to or exceeds my older i7 daily driver on most tests. true, that is not a real world comparison, but its a start.  Plus it has a 6 tflop on board AI TPU.. and my intel does not have that.    </p>
<p>Of course while its not really meant to be a desktop chip, the previous gen did 'feel' like an low end i3 or high end celeron desktop. So usable if you had to, but not speedy. Does fine in Chromebooks too.  This generation eats that for breakfast.   </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099324040</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2023 09:51:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099324040</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099324040@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>This kind of strategy rarely works, and is one I have seen send companies into dissolution.  Silicon Graphics, Lehman Bros, Enron, the US Fed Gov (hol' up ...)</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 23 2023 09:40:06 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;">This does not end well for them unless they're simply planning to maximize profits in the short term at the expense of driving away all future customers.</span></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099323498</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2023 14:40:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099323498</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099323498@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Since its release, I have suspected the coming of RISC-V meant ARM's  
 >days are numbered.  With ARM's recent "you have to use our entire  
  
 You're right, of course.  ARM has enjoyed the breakout years of "you don't
have to use AMD64" but they've scarcely achieved any sort of lock-in.  Android
is already architecture-independent (everything is in Java).  iPhone/iPad
is ironically tied to ARM but Apple is known to ignore that kind of problem
even if it causes users some short-term pain.  Linux and BSD have a history
of easily following along on any architecture.  That leaves Windows continuing
its inexorable sink into the tarpits of doom, but no one really cares about
that these days. 
  
 That means ARM isn't in a position where they can enjoy the benefits of vendor
lock-in -- but as we all seem to be observing, they are acting like they are.
 This does not end well for them unless
they're simply planning to maximize profits in the short term at the expense
of driving away all future customers. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099323046</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2023 22:44:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099323046</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099323046@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Since its release, I have suspected the coming of RISC-V meant ARM's days are numbered.  With ARM's recent "you have to use our entire platform or nothing" decision is just going to accelerate their demise and then the real pressure for rv64 to have amd64-comparable purrformance will really ramp up.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Jan 12 2023 09:54:33 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Actually if there is a transition to RISC-V it will take substantially *less* time than a transition to ARM. Or they will both be part of the same transition. <br />We're moving rapidly into an era where the ISA doesn't matter quite as much, as long as it's got a Linux or BSD kernel available for it, you're good to go. The era of requring a computer that is, to use an outdated phrase, "IBM Compatible" is waning. <br /><br />The combination of open source operating systems and cloud technology are making all of this possible. And it's wonderful. <br /><br />Agreed that ARM Holdings is throwing away all of the capital they've earned by being a solid, flexible, low power, and multi source alternative to the x86 monoculture. They're a leader but they don't exactly have lock-in. Add in the fact that RISC-V is zero license cost and they may have already blown it. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099322517</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:54:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099322517</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099322517@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually if there is a transition to RISC-V it will take substantially *less*
time than a transition to ARM.  Or they will both be part of the same transition.
 We're moving rapidly into an era where the ISA doesn't matter quite as much,
as long as it's got a Linux or BSD kernel available for it, you're good to
go.  The era of requring a computer that is, to use an outdated phrase, "IBM
Compatible" is waning. 
  
 The combination of open source operating systems and cloud technology are
making all of this possible.  And it's wonderful. 
  
 Agreed that ARM Holdings is throwing away all of the capital they've earned
by being a solid, flexible, low power, and multi source alternative to the
x86 monoculture.  They're a leader but they don't exactly have lock-in.  Add
in the fact that RISC-V is zero license cost and they may have already blown
it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099321823</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2023 12:06:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099321823</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099321823@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And yes, i know, i'm a borderline fanboy.  Its my EE background. </p>
<p>So disillusioned with ARM holdings its not funny.   They had the goose in hand, with all those decades of work to get where they were, just to squander it due to (current) bad management.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099321766</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 22:02:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099321766</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099321766@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Agreed it wont happen tomorrow, but with the sudden acceleration of things, i think it will happen far sooner than anyone expected.  I might even be around to see it.</p>
<p>ARM took decades to get where they are.  RISC-V, while isn't new, reached maturity much faster and market penetration almost overnight.</p>
<p>I think RISC-v had some things at play ARM never did.</p>
<ul>
<li>Chinese Sanctions.. That single event alone made it almost inevitable. Further developing RISC-V was the only real option.</li>
<li>NVIDIA buy-out of ARM.   I may be in the minority, but i think that would have been their last chance of survival as the money flow and tech resources to improve things would have been immense.  Might have been some market concerns later for licensees/competitors of NVIDIA, but i suspect in the end it would have been OK as they want the revenue and governments woudl be breathing down their necks. </li>
<li>Changes in how ARM licenses after the failed buy-out.  Now if you license their CPU, you have to use/license their GPU and FPU, and TPU, and you cant use their own. If they try to do that to NVIDIA or Apple when they renew, its game over.</li>
<li>General cost / control.  Always better if you can pay less AND keep total control over your stuff.  ( see above item :) )</li>
</ul>
<div>and a few technical reasons i think too, but not as dramatic as the above</div>
<p> </p>
<p>How long will it take to topple x86? Of course much longer than ARM.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099321751</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 18:45:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099321751</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099321751@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[No doubt, there are industry-wide concerns about the future ownership of ARM.
 The takeover attempt by Nvidia was a shot across the bow; it could have turned
into a real shitshow very quickly. 
  
 And I do agree that IoT will precede consumer devices, since they generally
only have to run a single application that is built by the appliance vendor.
 We've already entered an era where Linux has replaced Windows (or OS/2) as
the dominant operating system for "things with screens" -- such as airplane
seatbacks, retail self-checkout systems, ATMs, etc. -- and the Android userland
seems a better fit for these devices than the conventional one.  (Oblig: there
is not, and cannot be, a universal user interface that works well on both
small touchscreens and large upright desktops, as even M$ discovered after
decades of failures.) 
  
 So yes, these devices would be a great opportunity for RISC-V.
 It could take a while before mobile moves away from ARM, for the same reasons
it's taken so long for desktops to start moving away from x86.  And no, I
don't hate RISC-V; I like the idea of it and am excited to see what happens
next. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099321746</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 17:24:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099321746</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099321746@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Its begun.  Tipping point in 3...2...1....</p>
<p>Like them or hate them, google promoting RISC-V to tier 1 for android will change the game.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/01/google-announces-official-android-support-for-risc-v/amp/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099321736</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2023 16:07:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099321736</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099321736@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not tried it yet, but looks like Firefox is availble for the starfive v2.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>and a few other nice things like libreoffice and QT5.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099321640</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 18:52:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099321640</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099321640@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>For the IoT market, i think the Eco system is there. At this point plenty of options with full support across the spectrum. Now its just a matter of slowly eating away at the ARM market share. </p>
<p>For end user devices, beyond the lower/medium end like i'm playing with it may take another year, but the momentum is there and its turning out to be a logarithmic curve now that its in-gear and the threshold was met, so to speak. Tho we will see when that tablet comes out, supposed to be this summer.  I expect to see competitive desktops summer of 2024.</p>
<p>Server side, i heard that some UK thing tied to the government just committed 300m ti start producing high-end 'chiplets' for HPC this summer.</p>
<p>And technically its not encumbrance free. The downside is vendors CAN add proprietary extensions on their own. If that starts happening it will fracture things, badly.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jan 03 2023 01:39:56 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Right, so it's at a point now where it is being used simply to avoid the cost of a license, which is where the open source software world was 25 years ago. <br />It has not yet become "the" ecosystem that is everyone's first choice becuase it is encumbrance free and permanently vendor neutral. <br /><br />Hopefully we'll get there and it doesn't take quite that long. Software that is hard-built to a particular architecture and platform is not as mainstream as it was a generation ago. Open source infrastructure and web based software have made it easier than ever to jump around. Perhaps my current motherboard will be my last AMD64. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099321639</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2023 18:39:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099321639</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099321639@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Right, so it's at a point now where it is being used simply to avoid the cost
of a license, which is where the open source software world was 25 years ago.
 It has not yet become "the" ecosystem that is everyone's first choice becuase
it is encumbrance free and permanently vendor neutral. 
  
 Hopefully we'll get there and it doesn't take quite that long.  Software
that is hard-built to a particular architecture and platform is not as mainstream
as it was a generation ago.  Open source infrastructure and web based software
have made it easier than ever to jump around.  Perhaps my current motherboard
will be my last AMD64. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099321300</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 19:05:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099321300</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099321300@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh, and at a micro level, RISC-v is in all NVIDIA products, apple silicon, western digital and a bunch of others.  its 'glue' at this point, but its out there a lot more than anyone really realizes.  Sort of how minix slowly evolved to be *everywhere* but no one noticed. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099321299</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 19:02:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099321299</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099321299@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>For current boards i have seen/own: Embedded IoT device, a headless server, or a low-end desktop. Depending on which one you buy. in 2023 it will be competitive desktops you see and AI enabled devices.</p>
<p>i cant comment yet about my SF-v2 board with GPU as far as using it as a desktop, but i suspect more medium end level. intel i3 comparison is my guess. Just not that far yet. My v1 board worked, ran a desktop. Just was slow. But it wasn't meant to be a desktop really, just an early model to experiment with. No GPU or storage beyond SD. But it worked. it was neat.</p>
<p>Lots of IoT devices out there now ready for production use, and in-use.  Desktops/portables are next ( i bet mostly Linux and later android as they get into the tv box market ). </p>
<p>IoT devices are both Linux based and bare metal, im sure other options will come. One of mine runs Debian, another is bare metal. t has a LCD display, camera, battery, grove ports, and a nice pretty case . I hear the small boards are already clawing at the IoT end of arm. and ESP32s have already switched over. The momentum is there.</p>
<p>One thing missing in the Linux desktop build was a decent browser. But it will come, we are still early in this game.</p>
<p>But to answer the question, i donno, assuming the V2 board is like an I3, what can you do? Well, what can you do with any computer ... </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header">Fri Dec 30 2022 12:02:11 PM EST from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">So ... what can you *do* with a RISC-V SBC at this point? Is it just the thrill of playing around with a new and hopeful architecture? I like the idea of getting more of the world moved over to an open source ISA, but once it's up and running it's basically just another Linux machine, right? <br /><br />It is pretty cool, though, that the presence of an entire open source software ecosystem makes this kind of thing even possible. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099321292</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2022 17:02:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099321292</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099321292@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[So ... what can you *do* with a RISC-V SBC at this point?  Is it just the
thrill of playing around with a new and hopeful architecture?  I like the
idea of getting more of the world moved over to an open source ISA, but once
it's up and running it's basically just another Linux machine, right? 
  
 It is pretty cool, though, that the presence of an entire open source software
ecosystem makes this kind of thing even possible. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099320992</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Dec 2022 22:57:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099320992</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099320992@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>This summer perhaps, a RISC-V phone and tablet.   The new sispeed SOM that comes out in a month or 2, with a typical dev-carrier board ( which is pretty impressive according to the proposed specs ), but i guess they are going to start building things around the module on their own, and not just rely on 3rd parties.   </p>
<p>The planned 7 socket mother board sounds cool too.. mmm</p>
<p>Too bad it wont fit in my pine book pro..  different pin-out. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099319608</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2022 16:40:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099319608</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099319608@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>oooooo out of the blue the VisionFive/2 arrived today.  Never got a tracking number or even a shipping notice.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Now the "fun" begins of trying to make it boot. THIS im ok with needing some extra effort as it is new technology, unlike the ARM hoard i'm still pissed off about.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099318652</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 20:32:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099318652</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099318652@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I was an EE in a previous life. Earlier this year, i gave away nearly all my 'component' gear.  Parts, breadboards, chips, scope. generators, bla bla etc.  Several SBCs too</p>
<p>Only kept a couple of things, in case i ever got the urge to do 'something' but i know i was kidding myself if i ever thought id get out some resistors, caps, wires and stuff again and do it by hand... Worst case now id use an FPGA as the 'hard way' instead of discrete components, or one of my 'all in one' sbcs with grove style sensors and some python code.   </p>
<p>The  'fun' went away decades ago in all my hobbies. Part of it, i made my hobby my job back in the 80s. Big mistake. The other part, is just me i do realize, "fun" just does not exist.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I think i mentioned once that just after i gave away the last batch, i needed a resistor to test a sensor in the jeep. Just one 1k ...but  i didnt have *anything* left..  had to go ask the dude if i could have one back..</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Dec 03 2022 02:19:46 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;">LOL I mentioned in my recent Rants rant that I lack low-level embedded dev confidence when job shopping. This is roughly a yearly tradition for me. I have a bunch of eval boards and microcontrollers and other little goodies, and every so often I get the urge to pull out my breadboard and tinker with it. Sometimes I even make it so far as to actually turn something on and hook up to the UART. Then it sits there for a month collecting dust before I finally say "this is stupid, I'm not going to do anything with this" and put it back in the closet again until next time.</span></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099318642</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 19:19:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099318642</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099318642@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2022-12-03 18:07 from Nurb432 <nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org>   
 >Well i was doing some rearranging of stuff today since i made a lot  
 >of room tossing the last of my dead-tree books last couple of weeks (  
 >and some other things too ). Pulled out one of my FPGA dev boards.  
 >Set it on my desk.   looked at it for a while then put it back.   
 >    
 >  
 >    
 >  
 >Almost...  Perhaps next time.  
 >  
  
 LOL I mentioned in my recent Rants rant that I lack low-level embedded dev
confidence when job shopping. This is roughly a yearly tradition for me. I
have a bunch of eval boards and microcontrollers and other little goodies,
and every so often I get the urge to pull out my breadboard and tinker with
it. Sometimes I even make it so far as to actually turn something on and hook
up to the UART. Then it sits there for a month collecting dust before I finally
say "this is stupid,
I'm not going to do anything with this" and put it back in the closet again
until next time. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099318633</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 18:07:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099318633</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099318633@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well i was doing some rearranging of stuff today since i made a lot of room tossing the last of my dead-tree books last couple of weeks ( and some other things too ). Pulled out one of my FPGA dev boards. Set it on my desk.   looked at it for a while then put it back.   </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Almost...  Perhaps next time.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099318575</link><pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2022 05:14:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099318575</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099318575@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 10K/15K RPM is a lot less dense, hotter, more expensive, and consumes 
 
 >more power, and never really caught on for personal use outside of   
 >crazy gamers.   
  
 Right.  About a decade ago we were fitting our data centers with 15 KRPM
disks as primary storage, 7200 RPM disks as "cheap and deep" storage, and
much smaller SSD as "flash cache".  High end storage systems were the first
to implement auto-tiering, so the most frequently accessed data would end
up on the fastest disks. 
  
 Nowadays, spinning disks are mostly extinct in our data centers.  We're pretty
much only using them for backups and archival. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099318493</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 14:24:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099318493</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099318493@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>i know i have not used spiny disks for a long item other than backup where i dont really keep track of time, start and walk away.... So i clearly have forgot, but man, its soooo different from even a cheap Chinese SSD..  ill never go back again.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Dec 01 2022 10:23:50 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Thanks for clearing that up. I was reading this thread with my 7200s and feeling inadiquate and embarassed that I thought they were "the fast ones" when I bought them. I actually don't think I've ever seen a 10K RPM disk before. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099318492</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 14:22:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099318492</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099318492@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Somewhere i worked at we had 10k drives in servers, and they were stupid expensive from what i remember.   Been a long time since i had to deal with hardware at the office.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099318449</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Dec 2022 03:23:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099318449</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099318449@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 10K/15K RPM is a lot less dense, hotter, more expensive, and consumes 
 
 >more power, and never really caught on for personal use outside of   
 >crazy gamers.   
 >   
  
 Thanks for clearing that up. I was reading this thread with my 7200s and
feeling inadiquate and embarassed that I thought they were "the fast ones"
when I bought them. I actually don't think I've ever seen a 10K RPM disk before.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099318415</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:51:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099318415</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099318415@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Dude.  You're using 7200 RPM disks.  Those are the slow ones we use in
 
 >our data centers as "cheap and deep" near line storage.   
  
 Right, but 7200RPM used to be the desktop standard (before the desktop standard
got even slower, i.e "we won't tell you what the RPM is) and before desktops
moved to SSD. 
  
 10K/15K RPM is a lot less dense, hotter, more expensive, and consumes more
power, and never really caught on for personal use outside of crazy gamers.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099318364</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 12:15:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099318364</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099318364@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I still remember when they were fast. Yes i know they make 10k and more, but its what i was given for free.</p>
<p>And yes, they are now on a shelf, can be used for off-line backups if i need them.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Nov 30 2022 09:06:16 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>I went to only solid state drives here a while ago.  I had forgot <br />**HOW FREAKING SLOW** spinny disks are.   geesh. i'm about to rip </blockquote>
<br />Dude. You're using 7200 RPM disks. Those are the slow ones we use in our data centers as "cheap and deep" near line storage. <br /><br />I have one in my main machine at home for backups. I use `hdparm` to make it spin down when it's not being accessed. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099318315</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 02:06:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099318315</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099318315@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >I went to only solid state drives here a while ago.  I had forgot  
 >**HOW FREAKING SLOW** spinny disks are.   geesh. i'm about to rip  
  
 Dude.  You're using 7200 RPM disks.  Those are the slow ones we use in our
data centers as "cheap and deep" near line storage. 
  
 I have one in my main machine at home for backups.  I use `hdparm` to make
it spin down when it's not being accessed. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099317855</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 21:20:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317855</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317855@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It may be, or it may still be f-ed up Uboot. But, i'm not the only one still in this boat. Many have managed to find PSUs that work ( its random.. but most dont ) or wired it up directly. And it does sill act 100% like a PSU coordination issue, not a dead board. I could wire up a serial terminal and watch it try, but i dont care that much.</p>
<p>The entire roll out of this has been a disaster.  </p>
<p>If they dont fix Uboot soon, i may just hardwire it, or set it on fire. This was just to be a toy, as i'm not really doing any projects now, so not going to spend too much of my time forcing it to work. But i am curious how well it does, as its the next generation up from my other arm chips which i'm found of ( they are RK3399, this is RK3588 ), and should be around the same functional level as a mid-range i5 + its got AI stuff too. So in theory, a desktop that fits right in the middle of most things out today in the x86 world.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>in hindsight, i should have just cancelled it, but i sort of forgot it was still out there until it was coming. I pre-ordered in mid-January.. Stupid supply chain problems delayed these chips a good year.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I still have that RiscV sifive version 2 coming next month. No real need for it too, but the novelty of having it won over common sense. Sort of neat having fully open commercially supported hardware running fully open software. Never dreamed that was possible 30 years ago. ( this one adds 2 more cores + GPU + M.2 slot and an extra 8gb ram. A bit more usable than the v1 board i have now ). In time RIscV will eat ARM. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Nov 25 2022 03:35:07 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />I probably missed some other posts on this subject, but this sounds like a bad motherboard. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099317846</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2022 20:35:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317846</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317846@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I probably missed some other posts on this subject, but this sounds like
a bad motherboard. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099317650</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2022 23:02:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317650</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317650@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>OEM PSU arrived yesterday.</p>
<p>Guess what? Still wont boot, same thing powers up, loses power, reboots. repeat..  .  **(&amp;T#^%W#)_</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099317263</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 20:57:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317263</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317263@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>she was pissed when someone blew up her guidestones.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Nov 20 2022 03:51:01 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Even before the drives she would be mad at me, pointing her finger and yelling 'how dare you'. this machine is a beast.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Might be fun actually.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099317260</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 20:51:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317260</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317260@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Even before the drives she would be mad at me, pointing her finger and yelling 'how dare you'. this machine is a beast.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Might be fun actually.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099317252</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 20:23:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317252</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317252@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>there goes your electric bill.  gretta is giving you frownies, you don't want gretta unhappy with you</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099317199</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2022 12:23:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099317199</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099317199@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Recently i came in to possession of a few 7200 rpm server class drives.  Put them in my 'big' box in my cluster to put the storage up to ludicrous amounts for testing stuff and added them as shared storage to the farm. That machine normally is turned off. its just for when i need real horsepower for something, like AI stuff or video format conversions ),</p>
<p>I went to only solid state drives here a while ago.  I had forgot **HOW FREAKING SLOW** spinny disks are.   geesh. i'm about to rip them back out and toss them in the lake. just a simple clone takes forever...  </p>
<p>funny part was during a clone last night " what is that odd noise. something is up, that is a new noise " Thinking it might be the furnace or fish tank or something...went in the hall and living room looking and listening.. no its from the computer room..  "oh, dumb ass, those are the drives" between it being so long and the case is muffled from the 5 fans on the 2 video cards + cpu + power supply + 2 case fans..  damned thing is a helicopter </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099316763</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 23:48:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099316763</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099316763@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Then you better get out the 3D printer and discrete components and build your logic from scratch.. Buying a ESP/Arduino ( or whatever, even FPGA ) and slapping some code in it is for amateurs. :) </p>
<p>Oh, and blow your own glass to make nixie tubes from scratch too.  ( kidding aside, i have seen people do this, its pretty cool )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 15 2022 06:11:18 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;"> Something that not only looks cool but says "I made this."</span></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099316760</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2022 23:11:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099316760</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099316760@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The problem with a tablet is that it looks like a tablet.  There is zero coolness factor in that.</p>
<p>Here's a photo of my WWVB clock.  I deliberately chose a photo frame as its "case" because the point is to show off the electronics.</p>
<p><img src="
<p>Anyone can slap a used tablet on the wall.  I want custom electronics with a dedicated LED display.  Something that not only looks cool but says "I made this."</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099316159</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2022 15:08:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099316159</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099316159@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Hmm or a used tablet... </p>
<p>built in network, display, battery....</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099316119</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 23:45:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099316119</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099316119@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Might look at a higher end ESP32.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099316117</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 23:29:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099316117</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099316117@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[You know, this whole discussion about lightweight SBC's has been making me
think about my next wall clock project. 
  
 The last one I built used an Arduino and a WWVB receiver.  It's been chugging
away in my bedroom for several years and I love it.  But I wanted the next
one I built to be an NTP server as well.  That requires a network connection
and a computer more powerful than an Arduino so it can handle NTP protocol.
 I have another WWVB receiver, so that would work even though I'd have to
rewrite the decoder to run on Linux.  No big deal, really.  Or I could get
a GPS puck and things would work more or less out of the box. 
  
 Part of me is even thinking, why does it even have to be a Stratum 0 at all?
 Just grab the time off the network and display it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099316078</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2022 14:29:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099316078</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099316078@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Broke down and ordered one of their supplies, and should be here in 2 weeks.  Id even have ordered one with the board if they had told us they dropped the ball... I'm annoyed. Its not the cost, ( shipping was more than the supply ) its just that there really isn't an excuse for this from an established board maker.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>We will see now if they get u-boot code fixed, or if the PSU arrives first.   The race is on!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315726</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 23:11:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315726</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315726@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Tried my last PD supply today, same results.      ( apple OEM i had at work, people were saying some models did work. )</p>
<p>So i either wait for the to fix the code ( im reading people tried moving the stuff to uboot, but its still broke ) or buy a regular supply and hardwire it, since i dont think i have any laying around now. I got rid of nearly everything like that this year. Even had to borrow a resistor to test a sensor in the jeep this summer.   i had nothing left. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315708</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 20:47:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315708</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315708@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Right, with a little care to not assume the source has gone about 5V before
it actually has done so, power should remain uninterrupted. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315691</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 16:17:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315691</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315691@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>i suspect in the ARM sbc world everyone does it via software in Uboot, and not a chip. its 'just the way'.</p>
<p>.....and these jokers just dropped the ball and should know better.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315689</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 16:03:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315689</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315689@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > USB-C defaults to 5V power supply, same as USB-A. Consumers can   
 >negotiate higher.   
  
 LS is correct.  USB ports have always delivered a constant +5 volts DC, and
a USB-C port is no different, which is why you can plug USB 1.0 and 2.0 devices
into a USB-C port with the right cable and they will work fine. 
  
 "USB Power Delivery" (USB-PD) requires USB-C and then the devices on each
end of the cable negotiate for higher voltage and current, which requires
some smarts.  This can be implemented either in the device's USB interface
or in a separate chip (which, as was pointed out, TI can provide).  So yes,
it's completely feasible that a device which wants USB-PD but isn't getting
the volts and amps it's asking for might just keep reinitializing until the
user gives up and pulls it out. 
  
 Incidentally ... power over ethernet (802.3af and 802.3bt standards, not
the "borrowed pair" hack) operates on the same principle of negotiated power
delivery, and can go up to 73 watts. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315688</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 16:03:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315688</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315688@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>cool ill read it after bit</p>
<p>I have one more PS to try before i just build one.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315681</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 14:26:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315681</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315681@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 https://www.ti.com/interface/usb/type-c-and-power-delivery/overview.html

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315642</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2022 00:23:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315642</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315642@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The way they are talking, its not, just they f-ed up the implementation and we have to wait for code fixes ( or the workaround of getting a stupid PD or make your own and hardwire it to the GPIO pins )   But either way, at least there will be a fix.   just frustrating as i waited almost a year to get this thing.. now it dont work.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>and yes i did get out of buying these things as i dont do any projects that need SBCs anymore, but that was after i pre-ordered back January.   ( but this should be mid-range desktop level stuff with built in AI TPU, once it works )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 01 2022 07:41:59 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br /><br />Seems like that particular implementation might be an outlier. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315637</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 23:41:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315637</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315637@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
  
 Seems like that particular implementation might be an outlier. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315627</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 20:31:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315627</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315627@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Direct from their FAQ ( and a lot of others talking about the same thing of why its currently f-ed )</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="color: #697060; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #f7f7f7;">ROCK 5B supports USB PD power negotiation to higher voltage such as 9V, 12V, 15V, 20V to meet the total system power load requirements(around 30W with WiFi, SSD, USB peripherals etc). Currently the PD negotiation is implemented in the kernel driver, we need to boot to the kernel to start negotiation, however some Power Supply can not wait the ROCK 5B to negotiate and cut the power off when timeout, which cause the infinite boot loop. We provide the following suggestions:</span></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315623</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 19:27:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315623</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315623@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2022-11-01 07:13 from Nurb432     
 >Learned something yesterday abut USBC PD power.  I'm sure everyone    
 >knows and im late to the game, but i never needed to know this until   

 >now.     
 >    
 >      
 >    
 >I guess when a device turns on, the power supply gives it a trickle    
 >of current, with the expectation that the device will actively    
 >'negotiate' what it wants to fully power up.  And if it does not in   

 >x microseconds, the power supply powers down, causing the device to    
 >reboot and start the process over again.       
 >    
 >Most devices do this early on in the boot process,perhaps the very    
 >first thing, ( its inside UBoot if its ARM ), and if you are stupid    
 >and put this into the kernel, by the time you get there the power    
 >supply has already given up.     
    
 I think this is inaccurate.   
    
  
 USB-C defaults to 5V power
supply, same as USB-A. Consumers can negotiate higher. 
  
 I believe that all the negotiation logic is provided by chipsets (or "IP")
that you can buy from Texas Instruments and the like. Probably in quantities
of 1000+ 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315621</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 19:24:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315621</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315621@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2022-10-28 19:36 from Nurb432   
 >ARM is dead.   The fat lady is warming up to sing   
  
 ARM is dead -Nurb 
 Nurb is dead -ARM 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315569</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 11:13:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315569</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315569@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Learned something yesterday abut USBC PD power.  I'm sure everyone knows and im late to the game, but i never needed to know this until now.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I guess when a device turns on, the power supply gives it a trickle of current, with the expectation that the device will actively 'negotiate' what it wants to fully power up.  And if it does not in x microseconds, the power supply powers down, causing the device to reboot and start the process over again.  </p>
<p>Most devices do this early on in the boot process,perhaps the very first thing, ( its inside UBoot if its ARM ), and if you are stupid and put this into the kernel, by the time you get there the power supply has already given up.</p>
<p>And if you are really a dumb ass company and not only put it in the kernel, you only test with your special supply that does NOT negotiate, so that when thousands of people get your fancy new product the last couple of days, everyone is stuck in boot loops, until you update code or we hack together their own powersupply. ( or just get lucky with having a 'dumb' power supply in your collection, that also can put out 30 watts on boot.  I do not. )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Grrrr   They should be better than this. they are not new in this market. Tho they are the ones that put a m.2 socket on *backwards* so the SSD points out the side of the board and not underneath....  "oops, look we came up with a new daughter board you can use, sorry it increases the height by 2x and requires a ribbon cable dangling out in the air... Hope you were not planning on embedding this board into a product or something"</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315533</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2022 00:05:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315533</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315533@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And this time i wont blame them. Its the right move, once their license runs out. </p>
<p>Rumor is they already use small RISC-v CPUs as 'glue' on their SOCs now.  As does NVIDIA.   </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Oct 31 2022 09:28:26 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />So they want OEMs to get ARM licenses directly from ARM? The cheap chinese chip fabs who want to ignore all of it must be absolutely loving that. <br /><br />Cue the Apple announcement of yet another architecture change in 3... 2... 1... </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315489</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2022 13:28:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315489</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315489@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 So they want OEMs to get ARM licenses directly from ARM?  The cheap chinese
chip fabs who want to ignore all of it must be absolutely loving that. 
  
 Cue the Apple announcement of yet another architecture change in 3... 2...
1... 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099315259</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2022 23:36:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099315259</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099315259@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>ARM is dead.   The fat lady is warming up to sing</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.semianalysis.com/p/arm-changes-business-model-oem-partners</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099313885</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2022 21:29:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099313885</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099313885@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well, this is cool, if you use common SBCs and need some 3D printed cases ( and in theory, CNC for metal versions ).  Supports tons of boards and their common accessories, and its CAD format so you can easily change it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://github.com/hominoids/SBC_Case_Builder</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099313318</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2022 20:04:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099313318</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099313318@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>or my 8gb ARM modules..  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099313289</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2022 18:50:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099313289</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099313289@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Oct 08 2022 09:22:48 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I still clearly remember upgrading my ST to 4mb and thought i was hot shit.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p>Look at us now, with our laptops sporting 2x 32GB memory modules.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099313273</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2022 13:22:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099313273</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099313273@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I still clearly remember upgrading my ST to 4mb and thought i was hot shit.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099313270</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2022 13:02:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099313270</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099313270@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Looking at it last night and was thinking how id never even imagine  
 >having such a beast some 20 years ago.. and now i hardly even use it  
 >and it collects dust....   
  
 I still can't imagine half a terrabyte of ram. I thought I had a lot when
I upgraded to 32GB a few years ago, and I only did that because I turned my
desktop into a vfio gpu passthrough machine, so I can crank up a Windows 10
VM with a dedicated gpu and play stupid video games on it. It still feels
like infinity to me. So much so that I frequently use tmpfs parts of the filesystem
for compiling or watching movies procured through not so mainstream channels.
I've gotten a little paranoid about what I allow to be written to disk. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099313265</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2022 11:32:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099313265</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099313265@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>its actually one of my PVE servers. i use it when i need some real power. Normally its not even turned on. It started life as a etherium miner.  ( but stopped when the DAG hit 3gb... geez )</p>
<p>Was adding another 4TB drive to it last night, and cleaning out the dust. ( why? why not :) )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Looking at it last night and was thinking how id never even imagine having such a beast some 20 years ago.. and now i hardly even use it and it collects dust....</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Oct 07 2022 10:02:13 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Maybe with those specs you can finally look up and down. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099313235</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2022 02:02:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099313235</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099313235@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe with those specs you can finally look up and down. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099313229</link><pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2022 22:48:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099313229</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099313229@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>so is this overkill for playing doom?</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: rgba(32, 33, 36, 0.04);"><span style="color: #202124; font-family: Roboto, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 14px; white-space: pre-wrap;">12core xeon, 16TB disk, 1tb m.2, 512gb ram. 1080 video card and a 1650 video card.   DVD writer.. 950 watt power supply.....12 or so USB 3 ports.  1gb Ethernet   some sort of high end sound card thingie.   oh, and blue lashing lights on the motherboard ,,,</span></span></span></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099311718</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2022 22:22:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099311718</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099311718@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I take it back. only 20 bucks, the shipping price.  ( amazon price i saw was for the non-pro, pro is ~20 bucks more, which is about right )</p>
<p>Still annoys the hell out of me, buying something i dont want or need.  I stopped buying 'toys/dust collectors'. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099311490</link><pubDate>Sat, 24 Sep 2022 14:45:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099311490</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099311490@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>it arrived the next day..  And to make it worse, apparently i overpaid by about 40 bucks.</p>
<p>( but trying to ship a single item back to china.. not worth the cost )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099311356</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2022 22:24:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099311356</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099311356@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Rumor is that Samsung may buy ARM.  If they do, now you know why NVIDIA didnt get it. Politics. </p>
<p>I think that i would rather have seen NVIDIA get it than Samsung.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099311263</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2022 22:42:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099311263</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099311263@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>This could fall under "rant" or "stupid things i did this week":</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Man i wish i was not an idiot. New RK3588 box came out. I ran over to order it on Tuesday. it shipped next day. To arrive next Monday.  Went to download the drivers and stuff ahead of time, *wait, its a RK3399 ?!?!?!*  i got the wrong model number and bought the previous chip.. arrgh.   Nothing wrong with an RK3399 and i have always liked the chip but i have 3.. ( not including 3 laptops.. ).</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099309860</link><pubDate>Tue, 06 Sep 2022 13:16:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099309860</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099309860@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >I was doing stuff in the late 80s and early 90s on the plant floor  
 >with 8031s, its amazing how far that world has come. Both in  
 >power/features and they are basically throwaway cost now.  I  
  
 Even the simplest of terminals needs a microprocessor.  I fondly recall the
Z-19 (or H-19) terminal, and it is so weird to know (now, as I did not know
then) that the terminal used the same Z-80 processor as the CP/M machine to
which it was attached. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099309780</link><pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2022 13:57:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099309780</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099309780@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Cool, looks like both my RK3588 that i reserved back in early January, and the v2 Risc-V may arrive about the same time. Merry Xmas for me.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099308953</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Aug 2022 21:13:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099308953</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099308953@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well i guess not November for me.... They just announced the 8 GB early bird, shipping in December.  Originally that was only going to be an option on the 'release' boards.</p>
<p>Everyone is changing their pledge, everyone wanted 8 GB instead of 4, but none of us wanted to wait 8 months.. its already been over a year..</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Aug 24 2022 05:43:44 PM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>So v2 board for Starfive is out on kick-starter and samples have already been shipped.  Like an idiot i got in on the early bird special, shipping in November.</p>
<p>Like i need another dust collector...  </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099308889</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2022 21:43:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099308889</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099308889@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So v2 board for Starfive is out on kick-starter and samples have already been shipped.  Like an idiot i got in on the early bird special, shipping in November.</p>
<p>Like i need another dust collector...  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099308688</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 15:18:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099308688</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099308688@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yes the ESP IoT targeted controller product line .</p>
<p>I was doing stuff in the late 80s and early 90s on the plant floor with 8031s, its amazing how far that world has come. Both in power/features and they are basically throwaway cost now.  I actually threw a away a box of ESP8266's recently.  I didnt even blink an eye.. Went to ARM for a while after 8031, even that is hard to toss.. But ESP, 'whatever'... </p>
<p>RPI is still ARM based ( and lower end ). Most arm isn't a throwaway cost on your BOM, but super low end is pretty dammed cheap.  ( of course high end server and desktop stuff, is stupid expensive )</p>
<p>Micropython works on ESP32 too, and there is a native port of FORTH for ESP32.  For what that is worth, M5 Stack has some pretty cool IoT hardware, if you are into that sort of thing.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Aug 22 2022 09:19:22 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">ESP as in the microcontroller? It's an interesting prospect. Even the Raspberry Pi people are doing microcontrollers now. I already know Python so I could write MicroPython programs. <br /><br />The desktop of the future is probably going to look more like a Chromebook than like today's Windoze or Mac machines. Gadz, I had to use a Mac over the weekend and noticed how incredibly dumbed down the OS has become; it's basically just a slightly higher powered iPad with a keyboard. <br /><br />A future where the CPU doesn't matter. Bring it on. It would make all sorts of great hardware possible. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099308680</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2022 13:19:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099308680</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099308680@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ESP as in the microcontroller?  It's an interesting prospect.  Even the Raspberry
Pi people are doing microcontrollers now.  I already know Python so I could
write MicroPython programs. 
  
 The desktop of the future is probably going to look more like a Chromebook
than like today's Windoze or Mac machines.  Gadz, I had to use a Mac over
the weekend and noticed how incredibly dumbed down the OS has become; it's
basically just a slightly higher powered iPad with a keyboard. 
  
 A future where the CPU doesn't matter.  Bring it on.  It would make all sorts
of great hardware possible. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099308558</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 16:21:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099308558</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099308558@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>ooo just read that ExpressIF ( esp folks, with chips embedded in *everything* ) is phasing out totally the current xtensa core for RISC-v. So that means RISC-v IS esp now.. so it won that battle already.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099308540</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Aug 2022 12:50:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099308540</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099308540@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Armbian tool-set for Starfive - RiscV.  Cool.   Using both Sid and beyond into 'unreleased'  living on the edge,   no, past the edge :)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Still a toy at this point, but RiscV is coming for your desktop..  you can bet on it.    its already making in-roads in the embedded world, slowly displacing low-end ARM and eating into upper end esp32 territory....</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099302353</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jun 2022 00:30:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099302353</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099302353@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well that was scary.</p>
<p>New beta version of the OS for my Jetson.  Currently it boots on SD then 'flips' root to m.2 and runs from that.   Figured it was safe to boot off a new SD card, with no 'flip'.</p>
<p>Killed it..  no longer boots even with old SD card.   Or new one..  arrrgh! </p>
<p>Ended up using the 'dev kit' on another machine and reloading it via usb, directly onto m.2 ( a new feature, boot from m.2 ). Now it boots.. no video from either port but i can SSH so i know its alive. Arrgh. Panic time. But put it away for the day.  Was going to stick the SOM on another carrier board and try again. BUT thought id try another monitor, one that is better about displaying out of band frequencies instead of 'no signal' ( just in case.. as that happened with my RISC-V board at first. )</p>
<p>It booted and displayed properly via display-port.. wtf. Tried the hdmi port.. video.. wtf</p>
<p>put it back on the original HDMI monitor. it boots and displays. .wtf wtf wtf.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Some days i hate computers.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and running the dev kit means loading a new computer with Ubuntu 18..  they have yet to update support for newer versions, or anything other than Ubuntu. bleh. Oh, and wont work via a VM. no one really knows why, but it has to be real hardware )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099297025</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 21:23:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099297025</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099297025@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I stopped reading El Reg when they got a bit too much San Franciso in their editorial style.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099296988</link><pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2022 12:41:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099296988</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099296988@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Was my biggest concern about RISC-V's long term future.  Glad im not the only one, and they are going to try to prevent it.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.theregister.com/2022/04/01/riscv_fragmentation/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099296471</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2022 23:16:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Cloud FPGA</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099296471@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I realize its amazon, and they are evil, but still, a pretty cool service.  Didn't realize this was a 'thing" now.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/instance-types/f1/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099296247</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 22:06:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099296247</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099296247@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>the 2nd board is a bit more mainstream with its 2 cores and 8gb ram.  No GPU.   v2 is supposed to have that.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Mar 24 2022 09:28:36 AM EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">It's good, though ... the idea that you can now build a *usable* computer from unencumbered components is a Good Thing all around, even if it isn't the sooper-bestest machine. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099296221</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Mar 2022 13:28:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099296221</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099296221@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[It's good, though ... the idea that you can now build a *usable* computer
from unencumbered components is a Good Thing all around, even if it isn't
the sooper-bestest machine. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099295814</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 19:35:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099295814</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099295814@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>After spending several hours of reading and experimentation, finally figured out how to completely build a RISCV system from scratch, including all the stupid uboot partition nonsense. So that little 25 dollar RISCV board i was about to toss out the window a couple of months ago..  now boots.. </p>
<p>Not tried to get video drivers to work yet, but WiFi drivers are there and as long as you configure networking before you boot, SSH works fine.  ( and really with 1 core and 512mb ram, i may not bother with video. its really meant to be an embedded controller, video might be ok for status or something but i dont think i care as this was just to be a cheap plaything until i got better.. which i did get )</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099295813</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Mar 2022 18:42:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099295813</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099295813@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Got an email from a PCB company that due to 'the virus' HK is basically shut down at this point ( fluvid v2, everyone panic and hide! )  and nothing is shipping for the foreseeable future.  While its poor English, i am interpreting it as they are shutting down at some point during those few days and are down until future notice.  Gotta love 'engrish' </p>
<p>So if you are expecting something ( like me. arrgh! ) dont hold your breath.   Wonder if how it will effect the rest of the supply chain, which is already struggling.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"<span style="color: #2a2a2a; font-family: 'Source Sans Pro', sans-serif; font-size: 18px;">All shipments, PCBA assembly and PCB production have been suspended from 14th to 20th March until further notice"</span></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099295656</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 22:30:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099295656</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099295656@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Did not know anyone still made 65xx series processors. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099295650</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2022 19:18:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099295650</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099295650@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 these look cool... notice the price on most is $65.02   
    
 https://wdc65xx.com/sbc-selection-guide/   
  
  
 tempted to play with one for the retro joy of programming a bare 65C02 with
basically no OS, just a small library/boot ROM. 
  
 not sure what I would do with it though. control some RGB lighting, maybe...

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099295483</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2022 00:23:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099295483</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099295483@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>2nd riscV board showed. it actually boots..  ( still trying to get yocto to build. even the demo build fails.. not spent more time on it yet. ) </p>
<p>Too bad it ships with Fedora.. Looking at how to build a Debian root FS for it. </p>
<p>Not earth shaking but more than useable ..  2 64bit, cores, 8gb ram, hdmi, usb ports standard GPIO header, wifi, BT, bla bla. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294454</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 18:54:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294454</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294454@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Sounds like a party i once went to.. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Mar 05 2022 12:52:14 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=test2">test2</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>team america, big ending.  dicks, assholes and pussies.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294442</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 17:52:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294442</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294442@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>team america, big ending.  dicks, assholes and pussies.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294437</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 17:28:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294437</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294437@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[There are always going to be gatekeepers and there are always going to be
assholes.  And there are always going to be cool people to meet, despite all
the noise.  And sometimes people move from camp to camp, as they get older
and different seasons of life bring out different parts of one's personality.

  
 There's one particular chap who used to hang out here, who added all sorts
of delightful chaos to the mix.  Now he's an angry old queen who spends his
time gatekeeping the furry scene and kicking out "nazis" from conventions
and online forums (and his definition of "nazi" is basically anyone not ultra-woke).
 Kind of sad, actually. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294375</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 06:39:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294375</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294375@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So, here is the other thing about getting into Citadel in my mid teens and making "friends" that were... decades older than me. <br /><br /><br />I'm 52 now, and I have Citadel friends who are in their 70s now. One of them has lost both his legs and has congenital heart failure. In the 80s, he ran a FRP game store and that was what his Citadel was about - and he... he seemed old to *me*... but he was really in the prime of his life. <br /><br />This generation isn't going to realize how cruel time is - because we don't allow them to have friends "our age" because we're hyper concerned that friends our age are going to fuck them. <br /><br /><br />So they're never going to see their way older friends decline. They simply don't have them... and despite all their social justice posturing - they're "ageist" as hell. They don't know old people, they've just been told, "if they want to be your friend, they only want to fuck you." <br /><br />That wasn't MY experience - but maybe I was just a butt ugly kid.
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294373</link><pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2022 06:34:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294373</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294373@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It is the internet. We've been doing this long enough we know not to jump to conclusions - and we know what we MEAN isn't always how people reading it take it. <br /><br />*resumes 1000 yard virtual stare*</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Mar 03 2022 17:19:02 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Okie, i just read it backwards. it happens :) </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294233</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 22:19:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294233</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294233@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Okie, i just read it backwards. it happens :) </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294204</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 18:31:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294204</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294204@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Interesting observation about being of an ethnic type, doing an ethnic type thing, and getting banned for basically "racism," when you ARE of that ethnic group. <br /><br />You probably got banned by someone of some other ethnic group, too. <br /><br />I got a ban on Facebook for calling MYSELF white trash at one point. <br /><br />This is similar. You've perpetuated an offensive NARRATIVE about your ethnicity that people of OTHER ethnicities find uncomfortable. It doesn't matter if you ARE that ethnicity, it doesn't matter if you BELIEVE that this stereotype applies to your ethnicity - it isn't allowed - because if they allow YOU to give the stereotype credibility - then the people of other ethnic groups who also believe that stereotype will feel empowered to continue to believe it. <br /><br />And that simply works AGAINST the narratives of identity politics and critical race theory. So... it isn't *really* about erasing injustice and tearing down stereotypes about your ethnic background. <br /><br
<p><br /><br /><br /><br /></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294200</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 18:02:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294200</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294200@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>No, that was exactly my point. People are far more comfortable TYPING at strangers than they are speaking. Even if you altered their voice... your fingers have time to pause and think about the next word and ensure that what you say comes out as cool as you are capable of. Your mouth, speaking - you can't really do that. If you do, you look like a moron - if you don't, you look like a moron. There is more investment in SAYING something spontaneous than typing something that you can think about before you hit POST. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Mar 02 2022 17:02:38 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>That is overrated.</p>
<p>Aside from the 'invasiveness' for many people, ( as its TOO intimate, its why many are online they dont want in-your-face with people and talking is damned close ) its 2022..  real time discussions are long gone.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Mar 02 2022 02:00:10 AM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><br />But.. there are problems with it. The first off, TALKING is far more intimate, direct and personal than *typing*. <br /><br /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294121</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2022 00:04:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294121</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294121@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2022-03-02 17:46 from zelgomer         
 >Thanks for bringing up the "no risk" point. That is something that I   
     
 >neglected, and you reminded me that I have actually had that exact     
   
 >conversation with someone before. It's probably a reflection of my     
   
 >personality in real life, but I've just never been entertained for very
       
 >long by social gaming. It took these sorts of discussions for me to    
    
 >realize it, but what appeals to me about video games basically falls   
     
 >into one of three categories: either it's an immersive environment or  
      
 >story to explore (which I guess is analogous to reading a good book),  
      
 >or it's a simulation of something that either would be impossible, too 
       
 >uneconomical , or too risky to do in real life (e.g., monster shooters,
        
 >flight sims, and war sims, respectively), or it's a
challenge to         
 >overcome (like you said, they present specially manufactured and       
 
 >achievable challenges, such as platformers or puzzles).           
 >          
 > I'm probably one of the least sociable people in person, and I guess  
      
 >this carries over into my preferences for gaming, as well. When I was a
       
 >kid, I liked the idea of multiplayer and social gaming, but I think I  
      
 >was always disappointed in what I got out of it. As an adult I now     
   
 >realize that I really am content with a well-done singleplayer game.   
     
 >Worse, just ask darknetuser... it doesn't even have to have been       
 
 >released in the past 25 years...         
 >         
 >        
        
 I think I have never played a proper social game, with the exception of certain
browser game. Many browser games have very shallow mechanics and depend on
the players
making communities in order to keep people going back. People join because
they want to play, but stay because they have all their friends in it. At
which point it is not about the game anymore.       
      
 For your information, they kicked me out of the game because my avatar showed
an stereotypical guy from a certain ethnicity doing stereotypical things.
SO they said I was doing culture apropiation and banned me. The fun fact is
the avatar was a heavily edited picture of myself and I happen to belog to
that ethnic group. It was unreal.     
    
 I don't like playing online with random people that much. I am on the singleplayer
side of the fence. I will sometimes play with people I know IRL or who are
trustworthy Internet aquitances, in private servers or games.   
  
 Also, Doom rocks and all Cyberdemons must be squashed. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294116</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 22:46:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294116</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294116@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks for bringing up the "no risk" point. That is something that I neglected,
and you reminded me that I have actually had that exact conversation with
someone before. It's probably a reflection of my personality in real life,
but I've just never been entertained for very long by social gaming. It took
these sorts of discussions for me to realize it, but what appeals to me about
video games basically falls into one of three categories: either it's an immersive
environment or story to explore (which I guess is analogous to reading a good
book), or it's a simulation of something that either would be impossible,
too uneconomical , or too risky to do in real life (e.g., monster shooters,
flight sims, and war sims, respectively), or it's a challenge to overcome
(like you said, they present specially manufactured and achievable challenges,
such as platformers or puzzles).   
  
 I'm probably
one of the least sociable people in person, and I guess this carries over
into my preferences for gaming, as well. When I was a kid, I liked the idea
of multiplayer and social gaming, but I think I was always disappointed in
what I got out of it. As an adult I now realize that I really am content with
a well-done singleplayer game. Worse, just ask darknetuser... it doesn't even
have to have been released in the past 25 years... 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294110</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 22:02:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294110</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294110@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That is overrated.</p>
<p>Aside from the 'invasiveness' for many people, ( as its TOO intimate, its why many are online they dont want in-your-face with people and talking is damned close ) its 2022..  real time discussions are long gone.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Mar 02 2022 02:00:10 AM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><br />But.. there are problems with it. The first off, TALKING is far more intimate, direct and personal than *typing*. <br /><br /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294109</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 21:59:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294109</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294109@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not spent much time in 2nd life or On OSgrid have you?</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Mar 02 2022 11:15:51 AM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br /><br />I also don't get the "your avatar can be whatver you want" aspect. Do people really want to play mini golf with a mechanized furry and a giant Chuckie from Rug Rats? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294096</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 19:54:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294096</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294096@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Part 3/2 (heh). <br /><br />So, the chat was as weird as you can imagine. I'm not going to go bullet by bullet... but yeah, guy is a furry. He explained his anthro to me... I forgot exactly what it is... but it is a THING among his generation - evidently they've been hidden in scenes in MCU, like the Avengers End Game. I believe the guy is on the up-and-up on that claim... Marvel Comics is very pro LGBT+, and the Furries are kind of in the plus umbrella along with the Bronies. So I can see them inserting these icons of those cultures in their comics and films in a way that only those in the communities would notice. He has been in jail several times - for something bad enough that he can't BUY firearms, though he can be in possession of them. Some sort of felony. I didn't ask for more on that. He lives on his own, he is 28, he used to make an income from YouTube... but then they changed the monetizing rules and he didn't have enough of an audience to qualify. Now he lives on assistance - I suspect probab
<p><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /><br /> <br /><br /><br /></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294093</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 19:22:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294093</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294093@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Part 2/2 - on last night's experience. <br /><br />So, I watch this one guy interacting with this group of 3 other people - all of them wearing "Furries" avatars. And the one guy... is awkward and seems insecure, unconfident... but also... like... typical of the kind of misfit nerds that have ALWAYS existed in online communities. The guys who say inappropriate things, that try a little too hard, that try to be funny and don't quite get it. Just sitting there listening to their conversation for 10 minutes or so... I was picking this up. And people love to go, "You can't know all these things..." <br /><br />Having been involved with online communities and the kind of people attracted to these since 1986... yeah... I absolutely can. Today I was picking up a breakfast burrito from a local place and a guy walked in, wearing steel toe boots, rugged jeans, a vest over a T-shirt... shaved head, beared... and he could NOT stand still. Shifting constantly from one foot to the other as he waited for his order. Pa
<p><br /><br /><br /></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294089</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 18:34:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294089</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294089@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So, I've quoted you mostly so I can reference your original post and jog my memory to hit your points. I agree with you on many levels. You're not wrong about any of this. <br /><br />On the other hand - MiniPutt absolutely had the best aspects of what made Wii-Sports such a killer-app for the Nintendo Wii. It is an engaging, authentic feeling casual sport simulation. Wii Bowling was really the *killer* app that sold that console and the WiiMote - and there is a genuine evolution from the Wii, its avatars, and that sports collection to this VR world and the reason something as simple as Mini Putt golf is the potential killer VR app. It also goes all the way back to why the 2 Player COMBAT game was the perfect original pack-in game for the Atari 2600. It made two people sit down and compete. Atari got this with their 4 player games from the start. They wanted video games to be a family-night replacement for board games. It was something they maintained for long after it became clear that video gaming was 
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Mar 02 2022 11:15:51 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zelgomer">zelgomer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Growing up in the 90s I was fascinated with these virtual worlds. I played Active Worlds and some graphical but mostly-social MUDs. Every time I would try a new one, before too long I would realize how shallow it was. Eventually I grew out of it, probably because I reached an age where I could do more in real life than I could in imaginary life, but I've since reflected back on it and concluded that there is just no good way to do it. <br /><br />I think that these things only appeal to demographics that want to compete socially. If what you wanted was to play mini golf, there are better ways to do that. If what you wanted was to decorate a house, there are better ways to do that. I think that is part of the reason why you see the cliques and the social marginalization of others. In that world, that IS the game. <br /><br /><br />I also don't get the "your avatar can be whatver you want" aspect. Do people really want to play mini golf with a mechanized furry and a giant Chuckie fro
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294065</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 16:15:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294065</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294065@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Growing up in the 90s I was fascinated with these virtual worlds. I played
Active Worlds and some graphical but mostly-social MUDs. Every time I would
try a new one, before too long I would realize how shallow it was. Eventually
I grew out of it, probably because I reached an age where I could do more
in real life than I could in imaginary life, but I've since reflected back
on it and concluded that there is just no good way to do it.           
          
 I think that these things only appeal to demographics that want to compete
socially. If what you wanted was to play mini golf, there are better ways
to do that. If what you wanted was to decorate a house, there are better ways
to do that. I think that is part of the reason why you see the cliques and
the social marginalization of others. In that world, that IS the game.   
     
        
 I also don't get the "your avatar can be whatver
you want" aspect. Do people really want to play mini golf with a mechanized
furry and a giant Chuckie from Rug Rats? When I'm in the mood to play Star
Wars, I want to shoot at storm troopers and fly X-Wings, and I want my character
to look like he belongs in the Mos Eisley cantina. When I'm in the mood to
play Lord of the Rings, I want my opponents to look like orcs and my teammates
to look and act like dwarves or fruity elves. When I load up World of Warcraft
and the city is full of scantily-clad women doing the Macarena with usernames
like SlutDestroyer6969, it destroys the fantasy and the escapism of it. So
why wouldn't instead I just play a singleplayer game or watch the movie? Which
brings me to a similar rant which is that at some point I also concluded that
the whole idea of an MMO is also fundamentally flawed, but that's another
discussion.       
      
 But I guess the whole thesis
could be summarized like this. You can't control the behavior of random strangers
on the internet, but at the same time that sort of ruins the game because
it depends on their cooperation to maintain the immersion. You have to be
able to harm others in some way for there to be an element of competition,
but then you have to keep the Call of Duty crowd from bullying the people
who just want to play Barbie's Dream House Simulator. It may be cliche, but
the marketing is always "a world without boundaries," and I honestly believe
that hte boundaries of the real world--working within or overcoming those
boundaries--is exactly the thing that makes the real world engaging.     
    
 In my opinion, as far as multiplayer pretend universes go, the Minecraft
model is as good as it's ever going to get. Friends create their own private
servers, define their own rules, and invite their friends to join.
Like-minded individuals participate toward a common goal, either to build,
socialize, role-play, fight, etc. Like you mentioned, there is a gate keeping
element which keeps it curated and sane.   
  
 But having said all of that, I haven't tried VRChat. Interested to hear more
of your experiences and takes on it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099294014</link><pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2022 07:00:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099294014</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099294014@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So... I've been checking out VRChat... to see what it is all about. <br /><br />I mean... it is a logical extension of where this all started, right? It is just a wrapper on the same kind of telecommunications that The Source and CompuServe were offering in the late 70s. Citadel is part of it. Lonely and bored? Use your computer to find a community of people to form a tribe with. So... I feel like a lot of people... probably a lot of people on this BBS... are kind of shitting on this technology without remembering that SOMETHING drove them to hook up a 300baud modem to an 8 bit computer, load a dialer, find a computer magazine with a BBS list at the back, and plug in a number and start talking to strangers 30-40 years ago. <br /><br />It is actually what Citadel wanted to be at Citadel's genesis... a bunch of *worlds* full of rooms that you can go into and meet strangers and have adventures in. Citadel is a failed, primitive attempt to create a metaverse. <br /><br /><br />But.. there are problems with
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099293765</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 17:33:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099293765</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099293765@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So i guess we still some physical servers in our datacenter ( not vm-hosts, "real" servers )</p>
<p>One went down this morning and some stuff in the email thread:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"thanks to security team we were able to get it running.. Since it was a physical box we had to either drive in or use the DRAC which requires a client that only works with Java6, which is not allowed on any computers now.  Except one old dedicated desktop that is in the data center, that you RDP into, to get to the DRAC client to get to a server console.. "</p>
<p> </p>
<p>How convoluted. and stupid sounding..   If true, it sounds like we are WAY overdue for an upgrade of that.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099293762</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 17:20:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099293762</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099293762@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I think they trace back to the early 80s even. I remember being surprised about it, and that i had not heard of them back then. When i was using eproms as sort of programmable logic to replace discrete gates in several projects, i would have flipped if i knew about FPGAs.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Feb 27 2022 11:37:44 AM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Xilinx has been around forever. I remember seeing products that were little more than a big Xilinx FPGA and some supporting components (like a CSU/DSU back in the 90's) </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099293760</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2022 16:37:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099293760</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099293760@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Xilinx has been around forever.  I remember seeing products that were little
more than a big Xilinx FPGA and some supporting components (like a CSU/DSU
back in the 90's) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099292722</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 16:38:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099292722</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099292722@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So i guess AMD just closed the deal on xilinx.  And since Intel already absorbed altera,  no more independent ( large ) players in FPGA at this point. </p>
<p>That is too bad. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099292705</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 14:33:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099292705</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099292705@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So as some of you might remember, 2 or 3 months ago i pre-ordered a 'usable' RISC V board.  Been waiting. Finally got notice late last night it shipped, and had a USPS tracking number.  'yay'</p>
<p>Went to sign up for notices this morning, and damned thing has already left HK and is in north America. Its now sitting in Ontario..  arrrrgh!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099292703</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 14:31:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099292703</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099292703@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>its why i always kept mine 'light'  and didnt worry too much about OT discussions. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099292675</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2022 13:24:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099292675</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099292675@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Hell, we only really need a Lobby - by that logic. :) <br /><br />I mean... there are easily over 100 rooms here. I bet more than 80% of them haven't had a new message in months. <br /><br /><br />This has ALWAYS been the Citadel dilemma - though.  "We need the rooms to be on-topic... that needs its own topic... it doesn't really belong here..." <br /><br /><br />Creates room. Topic dies. <br /><br />Months later - topic comes back up... lasts a few days... dies again... <br /><br />Months later, topic comes back up, but the focus is slightly different - someone creates new room that is dedicated to slightly different topic. Eventually Aides or Sysop realize that there was already a room appropriate to topic. Moves all messages to original room, deletes new room. User logs on, bitches, "why did one of the Aides delete my room?!?" <br /><br />Wash, rinse, repeat... call it Citadelphia. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099292476</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 21:57:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099292476</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099292476@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And not saying i'm an expert here and only been dabbling in 3D since the early 90s, ( anyone remember rayshade? ) but i am looking at Gadot.. Unreal Engine ( which is freaking unreal what it does ) is free to use up to a dollar amount of revenue, but not opensoruce. Unity, last i heard was commercial?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099292475</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 21:52:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099292475</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099292475@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>For the 3 of us? :)</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Feb 16 2022 12:23:17 AM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>You need a VR/3D/CGI room. <br /><br /><br /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099292367</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2022 05:23:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099292367</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099292367@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>You need a VR/3D/CGI room. <br /><br />I'm pretty sure that VR is going to be the singularity... maybe the combination of VR and sentient AI - which I just saw speculation that AI might already be sentient. I didn't read the article... but the premise I saw seemed plausible. <br /><br /><br />Anyhow... <br /><br />I've been playing with CGI for a while now - but the driving sims are what convinced me that in the right use model - VR *is* a game changer. It isn't just a gimmick like 3D TV and movies were. <br /><br />So, to that end, I've been checking out the early VR offerings - and they tie into things like Poser and Daz3d... CGI 3D rendering and animation... but really - Blender seems to be the most versatile of these kind of programs. <br /><br />Unfortunately - it also has a Photoshop level learning curve - maybe worse. I bought several courses, but was struggling with all of them and getting started... and I finally found a course - for free, on Youtube - that is getting me the fundamentals. So
<p>Anyhow... bringing this back to hardware - I've been learning on my 5th gen Surface Pro i7 and it has been doing remarkably well with the Intel built in HD graphics... but I was starting to hit a wall. <br /><br />I've got an old i5 with a GTX 750 card in it... and just moved Blender over there... and it is a lot faster with renders - which is what I was hoping. DAZ3D is very Nvidia IRAY oriented - Blender is less GPU specific - but having a decent gaming GPU does make a difference. I have a couple of graphic workstations too with modern RTX cards (a GTX 1080 and a RTX 2080 in one, and a RTX 3080 in the other)... but I use those for gaming and graphic arts... and I'd rather keep Blender on something else until I am sure it is going to become part of my toolkit. But at this point, I'm pretty sure it will. <br /><br />But - I do wonder what Blender runs like on something like the Pi 400+... or a Mac M1... <br /><br /><br /></p>
<p>Blender being so cross platform - if I'm right about VR - could actually make Linux far more viable for a lot more users/creators/developers. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><br /><br /><br /></p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099290150</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2022 00:18:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099290150</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099290150@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Mine are blue, technically a gaming keyboard but no stupid back light..  Took one to work and everyone bitched about it. </p>
<p>I have 2 M100 IBM keyboards in the garage that i think about converting to usb every so often..   never do start that project.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099290148</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2022 23:53:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099290148</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099290148@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Hmm, that logitech keyboard zooer posted looks pretty good for the price,
though.  It looks like they're going for the "mechanical keyboard but not
high end gamer gear" space.  The switches aren't Cherry but I'd definitely
consider it, especially if I had to sneak it into a purchase.  It's even my
favorite form factor (tenkeyless). 
  
 Obviously, real Cherry switches are still the gold standard, but you pay
for that.  The one I am on now has Reds, which are the clicky ones. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099290141</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2022 23:15:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099290141</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099290141@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Doesn't everyone love the feel of a real cherry switch under their fingers?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099290117</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2022 20:25:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099290117</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099290117@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Some of you like mechanical keyboards:  New Logitech mechanical keyboards are conservative in looks and price</p>
<p>https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/01/logitech-debuts-simple-sub-100-mechanical-keyboards/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099289137</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:22:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099289137</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099289137@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>i saw that today too, and its the same chip + peripherals so basically the same thing bit a bit more $ than the one i got ( that i have yet had time to make boot. Stupid U-Boot )</p>
<p>I honestly dont worry about the 'made in china' risk.  Its no more or less risky than getting Intel or AMD here in the states, who we know have had stuff embedded for decades. ( vpro ). To me its a wash, as anything other than FPGA is compromised at some level.  And, CCP dont really care about me.. NSA, might.</p>
<p>Besides, if one is really paranoid, just watch traffic. Block it. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 17 2022 06:17:24 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />Is this a different RISC-V computer than the one previously mentioned? <br /><br />[ https://www.tomshardware.com/news/raspberry-pi-alternative-mango-pi-risc-v-sbc ] <br /><br />The " <br />"mango pi" is RISC-V based and appears to be positioned in the same space as the Raspberry Pi Zero. <br /><br />It has an "Allwinner D1" SoC so I have to assume that the system is fully integrated with Red China, so it's not something you'd put in a privacy-focused homebrew computer. Apparently, however, RISC-V support in Linux is moving into the mainline kernel, so that's good news. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099289134</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2022 23:17:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099289134</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099289134@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Is this a different RISC-V computer than the one previously mentioned? 
  
 [ https://www.tomshardware.com/news/raspberry-pi-alternative-mango-pi-risc-v-sbc
] 
  
 The " 
 "mango pi" is RISC-V based and appears to be positioned in the same space
as the Raspberry Pi Zero. 
  
 It has an "Allwinner D1" SoC so I have to assume that the system is fully
integrated with Red China, so it's not something you'd put in a privacy-focused
homebrew computer.  Apparently, however, RISC-V support in Linux is moving
into the mainline kernel, so that's good news. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099288214</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jan 2022 19:33:22 -0000</pubDate><title>99 dollar chrome book</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099288214@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>If you are into such a thing, lenovo, 10" Chromebook $325 off. </p>
<p>99 bucks, no keyboard.  ( and ya i ordered one.   dont need it but hard to pass up that sort of deal )</p>
<p>https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/p/laptops/lenovo/lenovo-edu-chromebooks/lenovo-10e-chromebook-tablet/82am0002us?orgRef=https%253A%252F%252Frd.bizrate.com%252F&amp;cid=us:cse:qza7ob&amp;source=connexity&amp;channel=cse&amp;adcampaign=CSE_Connexity&amp;cnxclid=16417541580478272958210080301008005&amp;szredirectid=16417541580478272958210080301008005</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099288116</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2022 15:40:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099288116</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099288116@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Figures, my little RiscV board i was mentioning above will be here in a couple of days.  Then this is announced:</p>
<p>https://shop.allnetchina.cn/collections/starfive/products/starfive-visionfive-ai-single-board-computer</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099287739</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 23:46:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099287739</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099287739@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>After using it for a full day, not so sure its an improvement from my i7 in 'real world' use.  I can 'tell' its faster but nothing real tangible. </p>
<p>Now, moving from the original i5 it had, ya, definite impact.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099287730</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 23:08:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099287730</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099287730@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I upgraded my dad's PC from a Haswell to an i5-11600 sevea few months ago.
I was quite surprised at how much faster it is in single-threaded work: about
3X faster in loading his big Excel file that used to take 15 minutes. Now
takes 5. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099287455</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 19:28:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099287455</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099287455@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Finally got around to replacing that i5 with a xeon in that spare lenovo tiny that i pulled out of my farm as a guinea pig.</p>
<p>A good 2x the speed, for ~ 100 bucks.  Its now faster than the i7 i have been using.  Enough it 'feels' faster and not just 'stats'.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099287248</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2021 01:27:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Mini RISC-V</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099287248@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Still on the low end, but seems like its complete enough for it to function.  Would be in older RPI territory i imagine.</p>
<p>https://liliputing.com/2021/12/this-5-dock-turns-the-17-sipeed-lichee-rv-into-a-fully-functional-risc-v-computer.html</p>
<p>Ordered 2 of them. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099284822</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Dec 2021 19:28:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099284822</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099284822@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 very impressed with Intel's Alder Lake chips. The Golden Cove cores are about
what you would expect - big and power-hungry and an incremental improvement
over everything else for single-thread performance. 
  
 But those Gracemont cores really shine, they're 1/4 the size and yet competitive
with recent other chips on performance. That small size is really exceptional
and AMD doesn't have anything that can compete apples-to-apples. 
  
 I want a server chip with like 256 Gracemont's. That'd be the real deal.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099284496</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2021 23:01:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099284496</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099284496@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[It's the same board.  I was conflating it with the Phytium computer mentioned
in between.  :( 
  
 As for the Nvidia/Arm deal, the FTC blocking it simply means that the correct
people have not been bribed yet.  The US government operates exactly the same
way the Chinese and Russian governments operate; the only difference is that
we pretend it doesn't. 
  
 I'd *like* for Arm to remain independent of any individual manufacturer,
or at least be stuck in a situation like x64 where multiple vendors have to
license each others' technology (the failure of Itanium was a blessing for
us all).  RAND sounds good in theory but in practice it's still just a single
vendor who can do whatever they want. 
  
 I like to think that all technology eventually trends towards being open,
but that trend has to outpace innovation for it to be worthwhile. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099284347</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 23:04:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099284347</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099284347@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Should be the same board as i was mentioning above :) </p>
<p>Anything you buy is pre-compromised. Be it china, UK, USA.. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Dec 03 2021 04:57:24 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Looks like RISC-V is making a bit of a resurgence. Here's a cheap chinesium SBC whose manufacturer is declaring it the successor to the BeagleBoard: <br /><br />[ https://www.techradar.com/news/a-risc-v-raspberry-pi-rival-is-about-to-hit-the-market ] <br /><br />Although I'm not sure what good it does to have a fully open architecture if the board and chip are both made in communist china. Almost guaranteed to be pre-compromised. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099284329</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 21:57:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099284329</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099284329@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Looks like RISC-V is making a bit of a resurgence.   Here's a cheap chinesium
SBC whose manufacturer is declaring it the successor to the BeagleBoard: 
  
 [ https://www.techradar.com/news/a-risc-v-raspberry-pi-rival-is-about-to-hit-the-market
] 
  
 Although I'm not sure what good it does to have a fully open architecture
if the board and chip are both made in communist china.  Almost guaranteed
to be pre-compromised. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099284297</link><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2021 17:23:18 -0000</pubDate><title>NVIDIA and ARM</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099284297@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Welp, that is the end of that.  Too bad. I suspect in the long run it would have been a good thing, due to the money NVIDIA has behind it.  Hard to say of course, as it could have ended bad for ARM IP holders, but wont ever know now now it was going to end for everyone.</p>
<p>I wonder if NVIDIA will switch to RISC-V instead, and create an proprietary IP set extension as F-U to regulators on both sides of the pond.  Then we all lose.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.eetimes.com/ftc-tosses-monkey-wrench-into-nvidia-arm-deal/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099284174</link><pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2021 15:12:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: BeagleV   Not dead afterall</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099284174@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Not from Beagle, but the board may still come out.  That is a good  
 >thing.  Proliferation of cheap boards in the RPI/ARM marketspace  
 >should help with future mainstream adoption of RISC-V, outside of  
 >IoT.     
  
 Mainstream adoption is good, especially if it eventually results in a fully
open computer.  Maybe someday Sam Falvo will resurrect the Kestrel project
under another name. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099283749</link><pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2021 00:03:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099283749</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099283749@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Note its doing it under *full* emulation..   </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099283734</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2021 22:18:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099283734</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099283734@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2021-11-28 21:26 from Nurb432 <nurb432@uncensored.citadel.org>   
 >Cool here too..  If i didnt already have a Jetson NX, id be getting  
 >one of these.  Reasonably priced desktop class ARM machine..   
 >  
 >    
 >  
 >https://www.cnx-software.com/2021/11/23/phytium-d2000-armv8-mini-pc-ru 

 >ns-linux-supports-gaming-with-box64-emulator/  
 >  
  
 "makes it powerful enough to play older PC gaming like Crysis" 
 Wow...Remember those "but can it play Crysis" memes? Is this what it's like
to get old? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099283731</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:26:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099283731</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099283731@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Cool here too..  If i didnt already have a Jetson NX, id be getting one of these.  Reasonably priced desktop class ARM machine..</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.cnx-software.com/2021/11/23/phytium-d2000-armv8-mini-pc-runs-linux-supports-gaming-with-box64-emulator/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099283729</link><pubDate>Sun, 28 Nov 2021 21:01:40 -0000</pubDate><title>BeagleV   Not dead afterall</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099283729@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not from Beagle, but the board may still come out.  That is a good thing.  Proliferation of cheap boards in the RPI/ARM marketspace should help with future mainstream adoption of RISC-V, outside of IoT.  </p>
<p>At least until governments realize they cant mandate backdoors on the chips and even outlaw its verilog...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.cnx-software.com/2021/11/27/visionfive-v1-risc-v-linux-sbc-resurrects-beaglev-single-board-computer/</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099281576</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2021 23:50:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: PinePhone  **PRO((</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099281576@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Im not going to get into the first batch, like i did the 'first' phonephone, but next year i will get a GA version.</p>
<p>IF its as i suspect, it could be both portable and desktop. Sure, it wont be eating Intel i5s for lunch, but that Rockchip CPU they are using is more than enough for a lower end desktop, especially since most people only need a browser these days.  Not all i agree, but most.</p>
<p>I dont have an i3 anymore to do a fair 1:1 comparison, but my RK's "feel" about the same to me as my old I3 using onboard video. The i3 i had, i blew up.. had a usb crytpo miner attached to it catch fire ( literally, 5" flames out the back of it )  and burn everything but the ram and SSD. even the CPU was gone. </p>
<p>That same chip is in a few Chromebooks too. ( one of mine is running it. the one i carry daily ). </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099281572</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Nov 2021 23:30:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: PinePhone  **PRO((</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099281572@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 PinePhone is a step in the right direction.  We still need to move towards
a single device that can be both your phone and your laptop depending on whether
there's a big screen attached to it. 
  
 And for the time being, the ability to run Android apps (safely de-googled
of course) would seem to be a requirement. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099280116</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 19:48:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099280116</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099280116@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>There are people on eBay who care a lot. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Oct 18 2021 06:49:55 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>There is almost no one around here that cares now. </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099280079</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 10:49:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099280079</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099280079@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>There is almost no one around here that cares now. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099280064</link><pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 2021 05:53:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099280064</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099280064@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yup, to all of this. <br /><br />Byte and glossy Atari ST magazines have significant value in retro-communities. Don't just dump those.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Oct 17 2021 10:56:34 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>More cleanup/purge today.</p>
<p>On the back cover of book " We predict in 10 years, computers will be the size of a TV set". Book was from the mid 70s.  They missed the mark, thinking in straight lines, not curves.</p>
<p>Bunch of old Byte, and glossy Atari ST magazines, back when you got a disk taped to the cover.   Times have changed so much.       ( anyone remember getting the little flexible plastic 'records' in magazines, and sometimes with cereal boxes? )</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099280022</link><pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2021 14:56:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099280022</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099280022@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>More cleanup/purge today.</p>
<p>On the back cover of book " We predict in 10 years, computers will be the size of a TV set". Book was from the mid 70s.  They missed the mark, thinking in straight lines, not curves.</p>
<p>Bunch of old Byte, and glossy Atari ST magazines, back when you got a disk taped to the cover.   Times have changed so much.       ( anyone remember getting the little flexible plastic 'records' in magazines, and sometimes with cereal boxes? )</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099279877</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2021 15:03:20 -0000</pubDate><title>PinePhone  **PRO((</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099279877@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Dammit Dammit Dammit  I dont need another phone..  Just got a new one last month.   They included an RK3399, i like that chip. have several things running it here.  ***fers just want my money :P</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.pine64.org/pinephonepro</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099277907</link><pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2021 19:46:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: More Framework stuff</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099277907@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I saw that video too.  Between that and his new house, he must really be making
bank on those videos. 
  
 This is something everyone wants to see succeed but not a lot of people want
to risk being the pioneers in case it doesn't work. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099277827</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2021 23:35:49 -0000</pubDate><title>More Framework stuff</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099277827@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well, this is encouraging. linus ( the canadian tech guy, not torvalds ) just dropped nearly 250 grand to buy stock in them. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LSxbc1IN9Gg</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099277778</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:55:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099277778</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099277778@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ya, the newt is too important to toss like those old phones and commodity tablets.  Was just surprised to run across it. </p>
<p>The calculators were borderline special ( HP 32E, 41CV, 48G.  They took me from early high school thru college to my first job ) but they are not all that uncommon, and they did go to someone, not a dumpster. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099277767</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Sep 2021 13:21:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099277767</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099277767@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Do not get rid of the Newton. <br /><br />Send it to me before you send it to e-recycling or a thrift store. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Sep 18 2021 10:21:25 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>oooo my newton..   ( ya, technically ancient hardware but its part of this weekends purge )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Took down about 30 books down to local book reseller to get rid of yesterday, This round was mostly o'reilly books and a couple of doctor who books. "gtfo, we dont want them, but we will shred them for you".  No, ill donate them. </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099277711</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 14:21:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099277711</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099277711@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>oooo my newton..   ( ya, technically ancient hardware but its part of this weekends purge )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Took down about 30 books down to local book reseller to get rid of yesterday, This round was mostly o'reilly books and a couple of doctor who books. "gtfo, we dont want them, but we will shred them for you".  No, ill donate them. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099277710</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2021 14:15:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099277710</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099277710@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Going thru stuff again today, tossed about 5 old cell phones and 2 tablets ( none are worth donating, wont talk to current networks  ).  Old hard drive ipod was in that box too.  memories.  My sansa was in last week's box, now in the trash.</p>
<p>Ran across a tablet i forgot i had.  Glasses free 3D.  Had a lenticular display of some sort. Was not 'practical' but was neat. Trying to charge it now, see if it still works.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099276850</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 20:52:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099276850</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099276850@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Neat. Not that GPU projects for risc v is new but this one is getting a lot of traction it seems and a CUDA port, well that is cool.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.tomshardware.com/amp/news/risc-v-runs-cuda</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099276058</link><pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2021 12:40:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099276058</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099276058@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 When push comes to shove, China does not really respect intellectual property
rights, so I'm not sure that will hurt them too much in the long run. 
  
 What *will* hurt them is loss of access to the equipment that's required
to build sub-10nm fabs, particularly EUV equipment, if trade sanctions continue.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099276012</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2021 22:11:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099276012</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099276012@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I think this was mentioned somewhere else, i lose track sometimes in the rooms.</p>
<p>Reading more, this could be a mess for the future of ARM after-all.  A huge part of the market is the cheaper Chinese chips. If they really have lost access to future ISAs that means either the chips will become obsolete quickly, or they will venture out on their own and extend the ARM ISA, and no longer be compatible. Not sure if other Chinese companies can/allowed to work with ARM UK directly, or if it all funnels thru the Chinese ARM company that is in the middle of this mess. </p>
<p>And throw in NVIDIA, they get holding a shorter stick than they had before. </p>
<p>what a cluster-F</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.extremetech.com/computing/326447-arm-china-seizes-ip-relaunches-as-an-independent-company</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099275088</link><pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2021 15:16:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Modular Laptop / Redux</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099275088@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That's the right idea, now if they could only get all laptop manufacturers to agree on a form factor, like we have on desktop computers.</p>
<p>Interchangeable parts are always a good idea.  You'd think they'd want to do the "eco-friendly" thing and stop forcing consumers to throw away laptop computers when 60% of the machine is still perfectly good.   Then again ... Apple is still making iMacs.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099274589</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2021 17:44:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Modular Laptop / Redux</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099274589@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not quite to the level we would all want, but was updating the m.2 in my PinebookPro today, decided to take a picture.  ( finally found one that will fit properly. its so thin many bulge the case.  )</p>
<p>It is modular. Their intent is to offer new mainboards as time goes on. </p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099274258</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2021 00:11:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Modular Laptop / Redux</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099274258@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Forgot there was a company who tried this before, even their 'CPU' was on a PCMICA card you shoved into the side of the device, like a modem, but it was the 'brains' instead.</p>
<p>Wonderful idea, but they didnt survive long. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099274253</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 23:38:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Modular Laptop / Redux</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099274253@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Right.  There needs to be a standard form factor for a laptop "case" just
like there is with desktops. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099274247</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 22:14:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Modular Laptop / Redux</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099274247@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Agreed, it was a shame they used a 'traditional' MB form factor.</p>
<p>From the videos and stuff i have seen you can fairly easily remove it for upgrades, or architecture swaps for people like me, but making it a "module" you shove in the back like their USBC modules do would have been even better. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099274140</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Aug 2021 00:41:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Modular Laptop / Redux</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099274140@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I saw that on Linus Tech Tips.  It looks pretty cool.  I agree, it needs to
hit critical mass so that it can stick around.  Or perhaps an open standard
for modular laptops needs to come into existence, which seems a little more
feasible. 
  
 I wouldn't have built it with a motherboard.  I would have built it with
a passive midplane that carries power and PCI-E lanes, and put maybe six internal
bays in the machine, one of which would be for a "brain" that feeds the bus.
 Basically like an S-100 but much smaller. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099272953</link><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2021 20:22:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Modular Laptop / Redux</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099272953@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not the first attempt at something like this, but looks like they have a good chance.  If they make it to ARM and RISC-V support, i might just have to get one as that means they are going to be around a while.</p>
<p>But, they need to market and get some retailers involved.. i ran across this just by chance. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://frame.work/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099268941</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jun 2021 19:36:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099268941</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099268941@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>when you want to rysnc ~400gb across 2 usb devices.  Be sure you plug BOTH into a USB3 port, not just one, if you want it to finish in your lifetime..    ( idiot )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099265178</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2021 15:50:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099265178</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099265178@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p><span style="color: #050505; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre-wrap;">Sort of funny to think. Here i am doing an update on an SBC that cost under 150 bucks that has more 'power' than one could even dream of having perhaps 20 years ago. Its got a 2 GB OS update today, and dont even blink an eye.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #050505; font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre-wrap;">Some days its the little things. </span></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099261503</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2021 15:15:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099261503</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099261503@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Cool.  Pine64 released their watch.  Cheap too. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://pine64.com/product-category/pinetime-smartwatch/?v=0446c16e2e66</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099260397</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:09:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099260397</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099260397@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Don't underestimate brilliant marketing and dumb luck. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Apr 15 2021 15:49:55 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">That's ok, I know this company in Armonk that designed a personal computer that was so awful compared to its competitors that it became the industry standard design for all computers for decades to come. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099260396</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 19:49:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099260396</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099260396@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[That's ok, I know this company in Armonk that designed a personal computer
that was so awful compared to its competitors that it became the industry
standard design for all computers for decades to come. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099260098</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 21:17:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099260098</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099260098@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Or smart people in other fields they dont understand.</p>
<p>Tho they had their faults EDS ( in the old days ) had that right.  They had you 'live' with the customers a while before you were allowed to do anything of any value.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Apr 13 2021 14:09:33 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>*thumbs up*<br /><br />Developers are often too smart to design things that work well for dumb, or even average people - </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099260072</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 18:09:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099260072</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099260072@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>*thumbs up*<br /><br />Developers are often too smart to design things that work well for dumb, or even average people - and they've got short tempers for people who aren't smart enough to see how much superior the way they DID design it is, if you're smart enough to understand it conceptually. <br /><br /><br /><br /> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Apr 13 2021 11:43:03 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>When i worked at ford back in the early 90s they had a plant floor system that people used on the assembly lines on a daily basis.  To avoid the problem most dev teams have ( siting in a cube thinking they do good stuff ) they had teams made up of both dev people AND people from the floor.  Really wonderful and usable stuff came out of a process when you include the actual users up front in the requirement and design phases. And to keep from getting stale, they would rotate people on/off the floor every 6 months or so, and move dev guys to different plants. </p>
<p>After i left, i heard that to cut costs they dropped the co-op program and went back to isolated developers ( in another sate, perhaps country, i donno ) and the results were dismal. In a matter of months, everyone hated the system and started destroying the floor terminals again. Not traditional terminals, but dedicated use, huge NEMA style weather sealed cabinets that used touch screens. The first thing i noticed is now they required keyboards and mouse ( in a manufacturing plant..wtf ).  complexity of use went thru the roof.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099260054</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:43:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099260054</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099260054@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>When i worked at ford back in the early 90s they had a plant floor system that people used on the assembly lines on a daily basis.  To avoid the problem most dev teams have ( siting in a cube thinking they do good stuff ) they had teams made up of both dev people AND people from the floor.  Really wonderful and usable stuff came out of a process when you include the actual users up front in the requirement and design phases. And to keep from getting stale, they would rotate people on/off the floor every 6 months or so, and move dev guys to different plants. </p>
<p>After i left, i heard that to cut costs they dropped the co-op program and went back to isolated developers ( in another sate, perhaps country, i donno ) and the results were dismal. In a matter of months, everyone hated the system and started destroying the floor terminals again. Not traditional terminals, but dedicated use, huge NEMA style weather sealed cabinets that used touch screens. The first thing i noticed is now they required keyboards and mouse ( in a manufacturing plant..wtf ).  complexity of use went thru the roof.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099260052</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 15:29:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099260052</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099260052@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I think Ig makes the mistake that a lot of software developers make. <br /><br />"It is EASIER for the developers means it is better for the end users." <br /><br />Which is hardly EVER the actual case. Especially in the long run. It may start out that way - but eventually it turns into, "what is better for the developers is best, and the end users are locked in, so screw them." <br /><br /><br /><br />And the lock-in angle is another actual example of that. <br /><br /> It tends to cause the ebb and flow. Here is the deal - eventually these web based solutions are going to make mistakes and businesses and individuals are going to seek alternatives. More than that - offering a local alternative is going to be a market opportunity for some group of developers against an incumbent. Someone will INNOVATE and use local use as a value add to compete with using server side deployment. <br /><br />Nurb didn't even have to try hard to come up with one of the major liabilities of distributed computing and so
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Apr 13 2021 10:04:24 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>You forgot the lock-in angle too.</p>
<p>"you now get to pay, forever, to access your stuff"  Renting software out is far more profitable than selling it. And when you can hold their data hostage, even the better.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Apr 13 2021 09:28:22 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">We don't put applications behind the glass because they run better there. <br />We do it because distributing software to all of its users and keeping every installation maintained is a gigantic nuisance. <br /><br />Some things just run better locally. Games, graphics processing, video processing, stuff that needs high power and low latency, if you can get your own computer running it, it's just better. <br /><br />But your ordinary information-based applications ... those are never coming back to the desktop. They shouldn't. They ran better centrally before the personal computing revolution, they run better centrally now, and it simply works better.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099260036</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 14:04:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099260036</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099260036@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>You forgot the lock-in angle too.</p>
<p>"you now get to pay, forever, to access your stuff"  Renting software out is far more profitable than selling it. And when you can hold their data hostage, even the better.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Apr 13 2021 09:28:22 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">We don't put applications behind the glass because they run better there. <br />We do it because distributing software to all of its users and keeping every installation maintained is a gigantic nuisance. <br /><br />Some things just run better locally. Games, graphics processing, video processing, stuff that needs high power and low latency, if you can get your own computer running it, it's just better. <br /><br />But your ordinary information-based applications ... those are never coming back to the desktop. They shouldn't. They ran better centrally before the personal computing revolution, they run better centrally now, and it simply works better. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099260033</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 13:28:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099260033</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099260033@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[We don't put applications behind the glass because they run better there.
 We do it because distributing software to all of its users and keeping every
installation maintained is a gigantic nuisance. 
  
 Some things just run better locally.  Games, graphics processing, video processing,
stuff that needs high power and low latency, if you can get your own computer
running it, it's just better. 
  
 But your ordinary information-based applications ... those are never coming
back to the desktop.  They shouldn't.  They ran better centrally before the
personal computing revolution, they run better centrally now, and it simply
works better. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099260000</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 05:20:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099260000</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099260000@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And we've been watching this ebb and flow for what... 60 years now. It should be obvious now... thin-client vs. local computing is like a tide going in and out. You may think thin client is winning NOW, and you may DIE thinking it won... <br /><br />But the tide will go back out - and the power of local computing will come in on the next tide... it is clearly cyclic. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259999</link><pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2021 05:18:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259999</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259999@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I don't think so. <br /><br />Most real work doesn't get done in the browser. The same problems that applied to thin-computing way back when that Oracle CEO was promoting it as "The Next Big Thing" apply today. <br /><br />Whatever you can do on your REMOTE computer that is WORTH doing... I can do better, faster and cheaper on my LOCAL computer. Inevitably. It is the same reason FPGA is superior to Software Emulation, regardless of the theory of tuning machines and enough cycles making it impossible to tell. It is the same reason that deep fakes are still detectable because they can't overcome the uncanny valley. The more abstraction layers between the immediate reality and the virtualized one - the cloud, the hardware abstraction layer, the CGI animated embedded face... the less *satisfying* the end experience is. The less convincing it is. The more distant it feels. <br /><br />You can't overcome that paradox. <br /><br />If I want "good enough", sure, I can edit a movie or design a 3D printed STL o
<p><br /><br /><br /></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small; color: navy;">Mon Apr 12 2021 14:57:30 EDT</span><span style="font-size: x-small; color: navy;">from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a></span></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />They certainly won, but it was a Pyrrhic victory. <br /><br />The real "browser war" was not between Netscape's browser and Microsoft's browser. It was the browser as a platform vs. Windows as a platform. The browser won, it won decisively, and it won big. Netscape unfortunately died in battle. <br /><br />And that's ok, because all of the Netscape people I've met or read on the Internet have been monumental assholes. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259951</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:57:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259951</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259951@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 They certainly won, but it was a Pyrrhic victory. 
  
 The real "browser war" was not between Netscape's browser and Microsoft's
browser.  It was the browser as a platform vs. Windows as a platform.  The
browser won, it won decisively, and it won big.  Netscape unfortunately died
in battle. 
  
 And that's ok, because all of the Netscape people I've met or read on the
Internet have been monumental assholes. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259944</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 18:40:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259944</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259944@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I donno, if THEY did, but the idea did .. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Apr 12 2021 09:07:58 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">They know what we all know: desktop computing is in decline. Netscape won. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259926</link><pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:07:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259926</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259926@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[They know what we all know: desktop computing is in decline.  Netscape won.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259819</link><pubDate>Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:28:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259819</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259819@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Here is the thing. <br /><br />Apple's hold on graphic arts has slipped tremendously in the last several years - in part because they didn't refresh their systems with current GPUs... and that the Surface actually gained significant traction in this market with their pen, which made the Surface an inexpensive and very decent graphic workstation compared to Macs and the Wacom Cintiq. A lot of artists who were dedicated Mac users have jumped ship because of this. My daughter and I are both currently pursuing general art degrees. The instructors, the students, and professional artists all consider Apple to have seriously dropped the ball. The move to ARM concerns them even more. They do not have the unquestioned lock in with graphic artists and they lost the 3D art market a long time ago. <br /><br />The ARM thing is responsible, as you note - for limited uptake. We all know the issues with Apple on ARM - including not being able to run *any* alternate OS on it, not least of all Linux. <br /><br />It is a
<p><br /><br /><br /></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Apr 10 2021 13:27:04 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">At this point it's pretty clear that Apple can build Macs with whatever hardware they want to. This will be their third transition to an incompatible architecture. <br />They know how to make the transition, and they know that their developers and users will follow along. <br /><br />Who cares? People buy Apple hardware to run Apple software. It makes no difference anywhere else. That's why Apple can get away with it but Microsoft can't. Windows on ARM continues to have limited uptake. Consumers are aware that if you can't run the existing library of Wintel software, you might as well be on a Mac or Linux or Android or whatever. <br /><br />That doesn't mean they won't ever change it. What it does mean is that it doesn't make that much of a difference anymore. <br /><br />And I'm ok with that. Linux is the fabric of standard computing and it runs on everything. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259731</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:47:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259731</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259731@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Or something out of left field, like commodore or Atari ( i doubt apple could have done it. they are mostly followers, not leaders. sure they most often improve on things and 'commoditize' them for the masses but they dont drive the boat normally. Even this ARM thing, others did it first.. )..   All it would take is the marketing power of one of those 2, the right timing, and an open enough system to have been 'it'.</p>
<p>But alas, it happened as it did. so its all conjecture at this point.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and yes, i was a cp/m fan )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Apr 10 2021 13:22:36 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">But if that had happened, some other standard would have emerged, and we'd end up in largely the same place we are today. It might have been MSX, or more likely it would have been further convergence onto CP/M and eventually some sort of Unix running on the same hardware. <br /><br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259726</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:27:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259726</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259726@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[At this point it's pretty clear that Apple can build Macs with whatever hardware
they want to.  This will be their third transition to an incompatible architecture.
 They know how to make the transition, and they know that their developers
and users will follow along. 
  
 Who cares?  People buy Apple hardware to run Apple software.  It makes no
difference anywhere else.  That's why Apple can get away with it but Microsoft
can't.  Windows on ARM continues to have limited uptake.  Consumers are aware
that if you can't run the existing library of Wintel software, you might as
well be on a Mac or Linux or Android or whatever. 
  
 That doesn't mean they won't ever change it.  What it does mean is that it
doesn't make that much of a difference anymore. 
  
 And I'm ok with that.  Linux is the fabric of standard computing and it runs
on everything. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259723</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2021 17:22:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259723</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259723@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >And it was by accident, as if corporate really understood what was  
 >going on down there it woudl have been killed off.   
  
 No doubt about that, if the piggos in Armonk knew what was about to happen,
they would have designed something like the PS/2 *first*, and they certainly
would have rolled it out with an IBM-only operating system. 
  
 But if that had happened, some other standard would have emerged, and we'd
end up in largely the same place we are today.  It might have been MSX, or
more likely it would have been further convergence onto CP/M and eventually
some sort of Unix running on the same hardware. 
  
 Apple would have done mostly the same things they did in our timeline.  Their
mistake was focusing on the Macintosh instead of the IIgs, which was by all
measures a better computer.  Mac happened because demi-god Jobs used it to
maneuver his way back into power -- a move he would end up making twice. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259671</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 22:16:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259671</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259671@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Meh. The move to PPC from Motorola made sense - and they had solid backwards support with OS X universal throughout the process. This is a much more jarring, sudden switch when a lot more rides on the cross compatibility. <br /><br />I think they are superficially similar - but the nuts and bolts are far different. They're counting on the idea that most business is web based, and that Microsoft is going to lose dominance - that the OS won't matter. <br /><br />I think they're premature. A lot of critical applications run locally - and there are huge trust issues with having particular apps running on someone else's computer - that are probably only going to grow. <br /><br />They don't have Steve Job's crystal ball. He was prescient in understanding how to be where the game was going to be, and that created difficulty for Apple - and even with Jobs, they weren't always right. For example - Firewire. They were too far ahead on that - and by the time it really became something meaningful, not only had th
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Apr 09 2021 14:41:02 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Many said that when they dropped PPC.. 'this is the end of apple" and even i thought it was a bad move, dropping a much technological superior architecture and alienating their current app base..   After a few bumps along the way, and years past, hardly anyone even remembers the transition... For a company thinking long term that has the cash to weather the change, a couple of years of headache = nothing.          ( i did not feel the same when they went from 68x to PPC, not much choice if they wanted to still compete. Painful, but necessary )</p>
<p>I still feel ARM is the future of the desktop, just like it is now for mobile.. Wont be an easy transition for many, but Apple will have a head start.. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and i really hate giving modern Apple any credit )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Apr 09 2021 11:19:10 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;">I think the M1 chip and the move away from Intel is Apple's Windows 8.</span></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259666</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 21:39:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259666</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259666@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>They abandoned Windows/RT but not ARM.  Win10 ( not WinIoT but the real one ) runs on some ARM machines now.   RPI being one of them.    Lenovo is making a Win10 ARM laptop too.  ( and someone else too, i forget who at the moment )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Apr 09 2021 16:10:00 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>I still feel ARM is the future of the desktop, just like it is now <br />for mobile.. Wont be an easy transition for many, but Apple will have <br />a head start..  </blockquote>
<br />eh, did MS abandon the ARM-based Surface? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259663</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 20:10:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259663</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259663@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >I still feel ARM is the future of the desktop, just like it is now  
 >for mobile.. Wont be an easy transition for many, but Apple will have  
 >a head start..    
  
 eh, did MS abandon the ARM-based Surface? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259651</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 18:41:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259651</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259651@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Many said that when they dropped PPC.. 'this is the end of apple" and even i thought it was a bad move, dropping a much technological superior architecture and alienating their current app base..   After a few bumps along the way, and years past, hardly anyone even remembers the transition... For a company thinking long term that has the cash to weather the change, a couple of years of headache = nothing.          ( i did not feel the same when they went from 68x to PPC, not much choice if they wanted to still compete. Painful, but necessary )</p>
<p>I still feel ARM is the future of the desktop, just like it is now for mobile.. Wont be an easy transition for many, but Apple will have a head start.. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and i really hate giving modern Apple any credit )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Apr 09 2021 11:19:10 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="color: #000000; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: #ffffff;">I think the M1 chip and the move away from Intel is Apple's Windows 8.</span></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259645</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 17:57:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259645</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259645@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Didn't mean it would not happen eventually, just that they did do it. And it was by accident, as if corporate really understood what was going on down there it woudl have been killed off.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Apr 09 2021 09:17:43 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>one thing that IBM accidentally brought to the table, a 'generic' <br />platform that everyone could 'use'. And why it blossomed. </blockquote>
<br />It would have happened, with or without IBM. The "MSX" standard was an attempt to do so, and it had a lot of success in Asian markets. It would have started to penetrate the US market too, but the ascent of the IBM PC stopped it. Before that, CP/M was the standard. <br /><br />It might be argued that CP/M did it better; you wrote to the OS layer because you couldn't count on the hardware being standard. MS-DOS (being a copy of CP/M) was supposed to be the same way, but developers discovered that they could make programs run faster by bypassing the OS and writing straight to the hardware. <br /><br />I'm not going to worry about standard computing going away. You can't put that genie back in the bottle. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259623</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 15:19:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259623</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259623@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I think Apple's magic has diminished - much the same way that BMWs has. All it takes is the media to stop guzzling Apple's juice. <br /><br />I read things now about how the modern M series don't have the soul, don't have the connection, the feedback, that classic BMW Ms have - that they don't stand alone - that in fact, there are other cars, even domestic muscle cars, that challenge or exceed the experience of a BMW M now. That absolutely affects the cachet of a brand when in the past they were universally dominant as top ranked as the "ultimate driver's machine." <br /><br />And Apple has increasingly had the same buzz increasing about their brand. Openly critical *fans* of the brand saying that they've strayed from iconic things that made the brand head-and-shoulders above any of the competition. <br /><br />The M1 chip is divisive - and these huge limitations that further wall the garden are going to make it a tougher sell. Some people, for simply practical purposes, are going to have to either aba
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Apr 07 2021 14:04:29 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>If *everyone* does it. Wont have much of a choice if you want to push your 'product'.  Sure, right now you can still get generic appliance machines, but with how its going, and the cost barrier vanishing,  may even see it happening in the commodity PC market. Wont be tomorow and still have options for the foreseeable future, but the momentum is growing. First app stores, now this. 30 years ago, who would have thought this would even be a topic?</p>
<p>Related, i think that with all the good things it brings, RISC-V will be instrumental in making that happen.  With no one to stop them, everyone will make their own 'version' with far less risk than in the ARM world. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And as a future prediction I think apple is going to prove that yes, people will, with their M1 chip  Last i heard, there may never be Linux for it ( or any other OSS operating system ). As its going to take reverse engineering for it to work, and if that happens, you risk lawsuits.  Doubt you see native windows either, like you can for the Intel based Apple devices. Even when windows runs fully on ARM  ( its close ) without drivers and permission, its not going to happen.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Apr 07 2021 11:01:09 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Won't that just cause a situation where few developers are willing to code for the custom, restricted-use proprietary extensions? </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259605</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2021 13:17:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259605</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259605@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >one thing that IBM accidentally brought to the table, a 'generic'  
 >platform that everyone could 'use'. And why it blossomed.  
  
 It would have happened, with or without IBM.  The "MSX" standard was an attempt
to do so, and it had a lot of success in Asian markets.  It would have started
to penetrate the US market too, but the ascent of the IBM PC stopped it. 
Before that, CP/M was the standard. 
  
 It might be argued that CP/M did it better; you wrote to the OS layer because
you couldn't count on the hardware being standard.  MS-DOS (being a copy of
CP/M) was supposed to be the same way, but developers discovered that they
could make programs run faster by bypassing the OS and writing straight to
the hardware. 
  
 I'm not going to worry about standard computing going away.  You can't put
that genie back in the bottle. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259396</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 18:04:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259396</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259396@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>If *everyone* does it. Wont have much of a choice if you want to push your 'product'.  Sure, right now you can still get generic appliance machines, but with how its going, and the cost barrier vanishing,  may even see it happening in the commodity PC market. Wont be tomorow and still have options for the foreseeable future, but the momentum is growing. First app stores, now this. 30 years ago, who would have thought this would even be a topic?</p>
<p>Related, i think that with all the good things it brings, RISC-V will be instrumental in making that happen.  With no one to stop them, everyone will make their own 'version' with far less risk than in the ARM world. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And as a future prediction I think apple is going to prove that yes, people will, with their M1 chip  Last i heard, there may never be Linux for it ( or any other OSS operating system ). As its going to take reverse engineering for it to work, and if that happens, you risk lawsuits.  Doubt you see native windows either, like you can for the Intel based Apple devices. Even when windows runs fully on ARM  ( its close ) without drivers and permission, its not going to happen.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Apr 07 2021 11:01:09 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Won't that just cause a situation where few developers are willing to code for the custom, restricted-use proprietary extensions? </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259374</link><pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2021 15:01:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259374</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259374@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Won't that just cause a situation where few developers are willing to code for the custom, restricted-use proprietary extensions? <br /><br />I mean, we've already seen what happens with this, with Facetime. Sure - Apple has a lot of momentum and people stick with iPhone because of Facetime and the ease of connecting to their Apple contacts. <br /><br />But cross-platform open alternatives like WhatsApp have eroded Facetime's dominance - because they'll allow the same things between Samsung, and Google, and LG and Apple users. Facetime loses market share *because* of their walled garden. The Apple guys see all the Android guys doing the same thing, with EVERYONE, on EVERY phone and they go, "Oh... wait... that is actually better. Now I can include my non iPhone friends on my video, VoIP and chat calls..."<br /><br />But beyond that - It is kind of like car manufacturers having their own engines instead of just all using Ford engines. Maybe someone does come up with something better - on the other hand -
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Apr 04 2021 07:44:23 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; color: #050505; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre-wrap;" data-block="true" data-editor="729u3" data-offset-key="bij92-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" style="position: relative; direction: ltr; font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="bij92-0-0"><span style="font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="bij92-0-0">Great. Even more vendor lock-in on the horizon.</span></div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; color: #050505; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre-wrap;" data-block="true" data-editor="729u3" data-offset-key="7nft7-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" style="position: relative; direction: ltr; font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="7nft7-0-0"><span style="font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="7nft7-0-0"><br data-text="true" /></span></div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; color: #050505; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre-wrap;" data-block="true" data-editor="729u3" data-offset-key="9kgvt-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" style="position: relative; direction: ltr; font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="9kgvt-0-0"><span style="font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="9kgvt-0-0">Soon everyone will have t heir own custom chips, with their restricted-use proprietary extensions. Fracture the hardware market, remove options for developers and consumers: "which walled garden do you want to live in". I remember when this was the norm, and that was one thing that IBM accidentally brought to the table, a 'generic' platform that everyone could 'use'. And why it blossomed. Compatibility enabled and shaped the market for decades. We are on the verge of losing this. Killing the golden goose, so to speak.</span></div>
</div>
<p><a href="https://www.theverge.com/2021/4/2/22364543/google-pixel-6-custom-in-house-processor-gs101-whitechapel-arm-report" target="webcit01">https://www.theverge.com/2021/4/2/22364543/google-pixel-6-custom-in-house-processor-gs101-whitechapel-arm-report</a></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259024</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2021 11:47:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259024</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259024@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>oops, that really should have been in hardware i guess.   still techie, but it is chips im talking about.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=2099259023</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2021 11:44:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #2099259023</title><guid isPermaLink="false">2099259023@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<div style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; color: #050505; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre-wrap;" data-block="true" data-editor="729u3" data-offset-key="bij92-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" style="position: relative; direction: ltr; font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="bij92-0-0"><span style="font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="bij92-0-0">Great. Even more vendor lock-in on the horizon.</span></div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; color: #050505; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre-wrap;" data-block="true" data-editor="729u3" data-offset-key="7nft7-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" style="position: relative; direction: ltr; font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="7nft7-0-0"><span style="font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="7nft7-0-0"><br data-text="true" /></span></div>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; color: #050505; font-size: 15px; white-space: pre-wrap;" data-block="true" data-editor="729u3" data-offset-key="9kgvt-0-0">
<div class="_1mf _1mj" style="position: relative; direction: ltr; font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="9kgvt-0-0"><span style="font-family: inherit;" data-offset-key="9kgvt-0-0">Soon everyone will have t heir own custom chips, with their restricted-use proprietary extensions. Fracture the hardware market, remove options for developers and consumers: "which walled garden do you want to live in". I remember when this was the norm, and that was one thing that IBM accidentally brought to the table, a 'generic' platform that everyone could 'use'. And why it blossomed. Compatibility enabled and shaped the market for decades. We are on the verge of losing this. Killing the golden goose, so to speak.</span></div>
</div>
<p>https://www.theverge.com/2021/4/2/22364543/google-pixel-6-custom-in-house-processor-gs101-whitechapel-arm-report</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671988</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2021 14:20:20 -0000</pubDate><title>ARM CPU Porn</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671988@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Was moving around some boxes today today so drug them out..            Overkill? Can you tell i'm a fan?   :)</p>
<p>All 64bit arm : 4 - RK3399s 2  - 4G Jetson Nanos, A Jetson NX  and a Jetson TX1</p>
<p>2 of the RKs used to be my servers. One has a 2TB m.2 and was my main file serer, the other was running 'services' like openvpn, tor, citadel, guacamole, etc.   Great little boxes. </p>
<p>The loose board on top, a RockPI 4c  must be one of the worst designed dev boards i have ever seen.  CPU is on the bottom, ( thus the huge heat sink ) making it really tough to stuck a fan on it. .and the m.2 slot points OUTWARDS from the side.. so your ssd sticks out the side of the thing unless you use some sort of adapter with a cable to wrap it back under the board. Sure its a a 'dev board' but makes it really hard to use it in a product, or even in a safe manner. Does have replaceable emmc, and thought it was going to be a less costly alternative for the other RKs back when they were still servers. But no, due to the stupid design and needing extra parts, no dice. </p>
<p>Of course my Pinebook pro is a RK3399, really fond of that chip. Even if it does a run a bit warm. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>And ya that is the Rocinante sitting there, begging to be painted...</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671506</link><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 22:02:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671506</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671506@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>If you are a RISC-V fan.. this is affordable.   I will get a gen2 when they have a separate GPU.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://beagleboard.org/beaglev</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671385</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 20:16:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671385</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671385@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Random thought:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Back at one of the plants i worked in we had 'stack lights' as we called t hem. A bank of colored lights that told skilled trades ion the area they had work to do.   That way they didnt have to sit and stare a a computer waiting for work. Blue = electrician, yellow = millwright, etc. They would see their light, know there is work to do and head on into the maintenance room to see what was up and grab their ticket off the printer there. And where it was quiet enough to talk to plan..</p>
<p>( pagers didnt work in the area due to all the steel, and it was pre smartphone )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Perhaps something like that, out of view of most but where your guys can see. With timers set to flash them. Each color means something else for the set. Good use for a battery powered RPI or something.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671381</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 19:41:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671381</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671381@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>No, it was great. But, i have always been a HUGE fan of Frank, and a fan of Dweezil.  Moon and Ahmet, not so much.</p>
<p>Just that they had Frank on the overhead behind them doing his piece, while they played the songs along with him.  So there had to be some sort of timing coordination going on.   Not every song, but several. </p>
<p>With Frank it was obvious about coordinating the band as he "conducted" them ( sometimes overly with a baton, other times not so noticeable to the audience ).  But Dweezil doesn't do that, or at least not that i could tell. Possible there were visual cues i was missing out on due to just enjoying been there, or they may have been hidden from view.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Mar 14 2021 13:12:45 EDT</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>Not that it maters, but ever seen Zappa plays Zappa? </blockquote>
<br />Is it as bad as Natalie Cole? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671362</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 17:12:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671362</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671362@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Not that it maters, but ever seen Zappa plays Zappa?   
  
 Is it as bad as Natalie Cole? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671346</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 13:39:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671346</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671346@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not that it maters, but ever seen Zappa plays Zappa? they did something like that. Unsure how they did the sync tho.   But ill ask my uncle,     I'm sure it already exists. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Nothing else a simple video editor and do it manually. Insert X at certain points where no one notices but them, like they used to do to warn the film jockeys in theaters a reel change was coming up.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671343</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 13:34:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671343</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671343@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ah, well you can still get drivers from after they move on to newer and better.  Just if windows ever changes versions again, might have a problem then. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I dont know enough from your description, but i can ask my uncle. hes a professional musician.. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Mar 13 2021 21:01:02 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>For what it is worth, Nvidia is recommended against by the OpenBSD <br />team because they suck as a company. Official nvidia modules are </blockquote>
<br />I believe you. Doesn't matter though, because I'm going to run Windows on this machine. <br /><br />It's going to be a cool project, actually. Without giving too much away, it's a project involving a retro cover band that will play in front of an immersive video wall. Some of it will be slide-show type stuff, but there will be video clips in the wall as well, and even some live video (crowd shots) if I can work that in. <br /><br />My biggest problem to solve is that the band will *not* play to a click track to stay in sync with the video, so it has to be built in a way that can handle "cues" at specific points in each song. I'm actually thinking about using PowerPoint, unless any of you geniuses know of something more purpose-built for that kind of thing. <br /><br />I'll bet I could even train PowerPoint to deliver cues to a lighting board, which would be great because that would eliminate the need to have another person at every show. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671284</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 02:01:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671284</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671284@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > >To be fair, there are a LOT of things they dont recommend.     
 >    
 > Like, actually using your computer. You're supposed to just sit around
 
 >and admire how secure it is ;)   
  
 Savage :) 
  
 My distaste for OpenBSD is pretty well documented so I don't think I need
to rehash it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671283</link><pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2021 02:01:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671283</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671283@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > For what it is worth, Nvidia is recommended against by the OpenBSD   
 >team because they suck as a company. Official nvidia modules are   
  
 I believe you.  Doesn't matter though, because I'm going to run Windows on
this machine. 
  
 It's going to be a cool project, actually.  Without giving too much away,
it's a project involving a retro cover band that will play in front of an
immersive video wall.  Some of it will be slide-show type stuff, but there
will be video clips in the wall as well, and even some live video (crowd shots)
if I can work that in. 
  
 My biggest problem to solve is that the band will *not* play to a click track
to stay in sync with the video, so it has to be built in a way that can handle
"cues" at specific points in each song.  I'm actually thinking about using
PowerPoint, unless any of you geniuses know of something more purpose-built
for that kind of thing.

  
 I'll bet I could even train PowerPoint to deliver cues to a lighting board,
which would be great because that would eliminate the need to have another
person at every show. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671245</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2021 20:02:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671245</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671245@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>A few of the 23 bit dust collectors, that got obsoleted over time and replaced with higher power stuff.  Sad really. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>( most them are not PIs, just PI cases. )</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 12 2021 13:43:25 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Should have said 'newish' arm. Last couple of years or newer.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I do have old 32 BIt arm in a box in a closet. Collecting dust.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671099</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:29:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671099</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671099@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>lol ruin. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 12 2021 14:28:58 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I have a couple of 1650s in one machine, but never tried to ruin all 3 ports at once.  ( they were for mining until the DAG hit 4g... so really the ports didnt even matter to me. )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Figured that he would want something newish tho.  Thus my list. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 12 2021 14:04:38 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I have a GTX 1080 and an RTX 2080 GPU in my i7. <br /><br /><a href="https://www.amazon.com/rtx-2080/s?k=rtx+2080" target="webcit01">https://www.amazon.com/rtx-2080/s?k=rtx+2080</a><br /><br />It sounds like something in the RTX range is what you're wanting. <br /><br /></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671098</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:28:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671098</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671098@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have a couple of 1650s in one machine, but never tried to ruin all 3 ports at once.  ( they were for mining until the DAG hit 4g... so really the ports didnt even matter to me. )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Figured that he would want something newish tho.  Thus my list. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 12 2021 14:04:38 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I have a GTX 1080 and an RTX 2080 GPU in my i7. <br /><br /><a href="https://www.amazon.com/rtx-2080/s?k=rtx+2080" target="webcit01">https://www.amazon.com/rtx-2080/s?k=rtx+2080</a><br /><br />It sounds like something in the RTX range is what you're wanting. <br /><br /></p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671092</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 19:04:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671092</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671092@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have a GTX 1080 and an RTX 2080 GPU in my i7. <br /><br />https://www.amazon.com/rtx-2080/s?k=rtx+2080<br /><br />It sounds like something in the RTX range is what you're wanting. <br /><br /></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671085</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:43:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671085</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671085@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Should have said 'newish' arm. Last couple of years or newer.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I do have old 32 BIt arm in a box in a closet. Collecting dust.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 12 2021 13:35:27 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>All arm hardware i have is running 64bit..  I cant be *that* much ahead of the curve.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 12 2021 13:18:34 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>2021-03-10 10:00 from IGnatius T Foobar <br />Thanks :) <br /><br />Linux on ARM is in a weird place right now, because the most common <br />operating system -- Raspberry Pi OS -- is still shipping as a 32-bit</blockquote>
<br />How much longer will it be the most common? <br /><br /><a href="https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/graviton/" target="webcit01">https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/graviton/</a></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671084</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:35:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671084</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671084@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Sounds about right :) </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 12 2021 13:31:38 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>2021-03-12 12:07 from Nurb432 <br />To be fair, there are a LOT of things they dont recommend. </blockquote>
<br />Like, actually using your computer. You're supposed to just sit around and admire how secure it is ;) </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671083</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:35:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671083</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671083@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>All arm hardware i have is running 64bit..  I cant be *that* much ahead of the curve.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 12 2021 13:18:34 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=LoanShark">LoanShark</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>2021-03-10 10:00 from IGnatius T Foobar <br />Thanks :) <br /><br />Linux on ARM is in a weird place right now, because the most common <br />operating system -- Raspberry Pi OS -- is still shipping as a 32-bit </blockquote>
<br />How much longer will it be the most common? <br /><br />https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/graviton/ </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671082</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:31:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671082</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671082@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2021-03-12 12:07 from Nurb432   
 >To be fair, there are a LOT of things they dont recommend.   
  
 Like, actually using your computer. You're supposed to just sit around and
admire how secure it is ;) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671081</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:22:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671081</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671081@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2021-03-10 16:42 from Nurb432   
 >High end NVIDIA should do that    
 >> Wed Mar 10 2021 15:04:47 EST from IGnatius T Foobar   
 >>  
 >>    
 >>On a completely different note, I have found myself in a position  
 >>where I need to spec a computer for a video presentation project. Who 

 >>here knows their SuperMegaDoomDestroyer video cards?   
 >>  
 >>I need to figure out what kind of video card to put in a machine  
 >>that is expected to drive video playback on three (3) Full HD  
 >>(1920x1080) monitors.   
 >>I know, that's a lot of power but I'm spending someone else's money  
  
 A lot of context here to quote, so I quoted all of it. 
  
 1) High end NVIDIA is currently unobtainium. I'm backordered to smithereens.
But at least I was able to place a backorder at all; most resellers don't
accept backorders. So I think, in practical terms, you can either backorder
via shopblt.com,
a friendly scalper like britishminers, or a less friendly scalper, or try
your luck with the Newegg Shuffle. 
  
 2) You don't actually need a very powerful video card just to drive 3 FHD
outputs, even with video playback. I bet there are some mobos with integrated
video that can handle that; it's mostly just a question of which ports you
have natively and what displayport splitters you add on after the fact. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671080</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 18:18:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671080</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671080@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2021-03-10 10:00 from IGnatius T Foobar   
 >Thanks :)   
 >    
 > Linux on ARM is in a weird place right now, because the most common   
 >operating system -- Raspberry Pi OS -- is still shipping as a 32-bit   
  
 How much longer will it be the most common? 
  
 https://aws.amazon.com/ec2/graviton/ 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671066</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:07:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671066</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671066@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>To be fair, there are a LOT of things they dont recommend.</p>
<p>Some of it for security and technical reasons, some of it for political.  Theo is a nutcase, remember.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 12 2021 10:21:52 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><span style="color: #000000; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify; background-color: #ffffff;">Nvidia is recommended against by the OpenBSD team</span></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671065</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 17:05:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671065</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671065@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yes there are risks for ANY hardware you choose. However not too long after a card comes out, OSS drivers do appear, and by the time a card is sunsetted the OSS drivers have improved and are fine. So you are not as screwed as it sounds. </p>
<p>As far as i'm concerned tho, for GPU power no one else comes close, so if you care more about performance, you go with them. If you are more worried about long(er) term native support, then go with someone else.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Mar 12 2021 10:21:52 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=darknetuser">darknetuser</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>2021-03-11 13:15 from IGnatius T Foobar <br />
<blockquote>High end NVIDIA should do that </blockquote>
<br />I am not a PC gamer. What does that mean? <br /><br /><br /></blockquote>
<br />For what it is worth, Nvidia is recommended against by the OpenBSD team because they suck as a company. Official nvidia modules are tightly integrated to your kernel and GUI stack. When Nvidia decides to pull support from your stack or kernel (which is not that rare if you are a poor darknetuser in a screwed up country) then the graphic card is useless. <br /><br />Example: <br /><br />You buy card A and install Nvidia's official modules. A year later, you upgrade your distro and install the next official Nvidia modules. YOu upgrade once per year in this phashion until one day Nvidia comes and tells you that your card is no longer being served drivers for modern distributions. <br /><br />So at that point you either have to get a modern card or you have to stop updating and keep using an old unmaintained distribution with that particular set of hardware. <br /><br />And then somebody pops up and tells you it is your fault for not upgrading. Sorry man, if I could have more than 30 bucks in my bank accou
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4671050</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2021 15:21:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4671050</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4671050@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2021-03-11 13:15 from IGnatius T Foobar               
 > >High end NVIDIA should do that                   
 >                
 > I am not a PC gamer.  What does that mean?               
 >               
 >              
              
 For what it is worth, Nvidia is recommended against by the OpenBSD team because
they suck as a company. Official nvidia modules are tightly integrated to
your kernel and GUI stack. When Nvidia decides to pull support from your stack
or kernel (which is not that rare if you are a poor darknetuser in a screwed
up country) then the graphic card is useless.             
            
 Example:           
          
 You buy card A and install Nvidia's official modules. A year later, you upgrade
your distro and install the next official Nvidia modules. YOu upgrade once
per year in this phashion until one day Nvidia comes and tells you that your
card is no
longer being served drivers for modern distributions.         
        
 So at that point you either have to get a modern card or you have to stop
updating and keep using an old unmaintained distribution with that particular
set of hardware.       
      
 And then somebody pops up and tells you it is your fault for not upgrading.
Sorry man, if I could have more than 30 bucks in my bank account I would,
but what do you expect me to do? Go out and steal a new computer?     
    
 If they just did what ATI/AMD does and had a B-class set of FOSS modules
this would be much less of a problem. I understand people does not care for
poor losers enough to write modules for them, and that is ok, but don't be
a dick about it.   
  
 Now I feel I should be pasting this in Rants. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670980</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 23:04:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670980</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670980@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have not done it so i cant tell you how pull it off from experience, but others have.  I'm not sure if you can emulate things like their GPU or WIFI, and instead ifs going to be generic peripherals i bet, but you dont care about that anyway. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>A quick search came up with this, and it seems simple enough.   https://azeria-labs.com/emulate-raspberry-pi-with-qemu/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670977</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 22:35:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670977</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670977@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >OR ( people do this for dev work i know )  Take your x86 and run  
 >QEMU with 2 ARM VMs..   Then you have instant snapshots if you hose  
 >it.  Wont be running Raspbian, but Armbian is pretty standard these  
 >days   
  
 You can do that?  ARM emulated (slowly) on x86 to a degree that it can compile
and run executables that will run on a Raspberry Pi?  That would be perfect
for an automated build chain, and then I could use my "real" Pi for testing
the builds. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670966</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:18:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670966</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670966@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Here are the current cards with approx prices ( and rankings, which you dont care about so much ). Id check budget then check on detail specs of which ever card they can afford. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://www.cgdirector.com/nvidia-graphics-cards-order-performance/</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Mar 11 2021 13:15:01 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>High end NVIDIA should do that  </blockquote>
<br />I am not a PC gamer. What does that mean? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670965</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:58:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670965</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670965@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>its a pi3, right?  ( i assume the 4 does too but not touched a 4 ) Just have 2 SD cards, one for a 32 build and one for a 64. ( even its a 3rd party OS )  Don't need another machine that way.</p>
<p>OR ( people do this for dev work i know )  Take your x86 and run QEMU with 2 ARM VMs..   Then you have instant snapshots if you hose it.  Wont be running Raspbian, but Armbian is pretty standard these days</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Mar 11 2021 13:14:44 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>Pretty sure you can get 64bit OS 3rd party, for the PI4 at least. </blockquote>
<br />You can -- and in fact there is a 64-bit version of Raspberry Pi OS in development, but it seems that they don't plan to release it for a while yet. And that's the problem. As some of you know, I have taken an interest in binary distribution of Linux software using the AppImage format. And you know that my software uses a nonportable on-disk data format that turns into binary sludge if you try to use it on an architecture other than the one that wrote it to disk. <br /><br />x86 is easy. The move to 64-bit has been completed by just about everyone, and I can easily say "to use this package you have to be on a 64-bit machine, c'mon man, it's the current year". Any cave-dwellers who are still running their production systems on 32-bit (like ME) have to get with the times. <br /><br />ARM is not so easy, because we're in the beginning stages of the transition from 32-bit to 64-bit. So my choices are: <br /><br />1. Run my build machine in 32-bit mode, release 32-bit binaries, and force everyone to run the
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670956</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:15:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670956</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670956@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >High end NVIDIA should do that    
  
 I am not a PC gamer.  What does that mean? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670955</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:14:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670955</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670955@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Pretty sure you can get 64bit OS 3rd party, for the PI4 at least.   
  
 You can -- and in fact there is a 64-bit version of Raspberry Pi OS in development,
but it seems that they don't plan to release it for a while yet.  And that's
the problem.  As some of you know, I have taken an interest in binary distribution
of Linux software using the AppImage format.  And you know that my software
uses a nonportable on-disk data format that turns into binary sludge if you
try to use it on an architecture other than the one that wrote it to disk.

  
 x86 is easy.  The move to 64-bit has been completed by just about everyone,
and I can easily say "to use this package you have to be on a 64-bit machine,
c'mon man, it's the current year".  Any cave-dwellers who are still running
their production systems on 32-bit (like ME) have to get with the times. 
  
 ARM is not so easy, because we're in the beginning
stages of the transition from 32-bit to 64-bit.  So my choices are: 
  
 1. Run my build machine in 32-bit mode, release 32-bit binaries, and force
everyone to run them forever 
 2. Acquire another build machine and run 32-bit and 64-bit builds for the
foreseeable future 
 3. Run my build machine in 64-bit mode, and force users to get on the bleeding
edge with beta quality 64-bit OS 
  
 I really don't like *any* of those options, especially when I know that five
years from now everyone will be running ARM in 64-bit mode.  But I want to
start publishing binaries now. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670851</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:42:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670851</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670851@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>High end NVIDIA should do that </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Mar 10 2021 15:04:47 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />On a completely different note, I have found myself in a position where I need to spec a computer for a video presentation project. Who here knows their SuperMegaDoomDestroyer video cards? <br /><br />I need to figure out what kind of video card to put in a machine that is expected to drive video playback on three (3) Full HD (1920x1080) monitors. <br />I know, that's a lot of power but I'm spending someone else's money :) </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670850</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 21:41:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670850</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670850@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Pretty sure you can get 64bit OS 3rd party, for the PI4 at least.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Mar 10 2021 10:00:47 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Thanks :) <br /><br />Linux on ARM is in a weird place right now, because the most common operating system -- Raspberry Pi OS -- is still shipping as a 32-bit OS. We're in that weird space right now where you can ship 32-bit software "to be safe" but all the new machines are 64-bit. <br /><br />I think x86 has passed that phase, for the most part. Just about everyone is running 64-bit, and we're at the point where it's safe to drop 32-bit support most of the time. I like that. I won't have to build multiple sets of binaries, and I won't have to deal with the Year 2038 problem. <br /><br />It is interesting to wonder when, or if, 128-bit architectures will appear (not in weird places, but in mainstream tech). A 64-bit architecture can address 16 EB (18,446,744,073,709,551,616 bytes). That's enough address space to memory-map the largest databases. Obviously we can't say "never" (the worst person in the world famously said "640K ought to be enough for anybody") but if a move to 128-b
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670830</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:04:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670830</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670830@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 On a completely different note, I have found myself in a position where I
need to spec a computer for a video presentation project.  Who here knows
their SuperMegaDoomDestroyer video cards? 
  
 I need to figure out what kind of video card to put in a machine that is
expected to drive video playback on three (3) Full HD (1920x1080) monitors.
 I know, that's a lot of power but I'm spending someone else's money  :) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670767</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2021 15:00:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670767</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670767@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks :) 
  
 Linux on ARM is in a weird place right now, because the most common operating
system -- Raspberry Pi OS -- is still shipping as a 32-bit OS.  We're in that
weird space right now where you can ship 32-bit software "to be safe" but
all the new machines are 64-bit. 
  
 I think x86 has passed that phase, for the most part.  Just about everyone
is running 64-bit, and we're at the point where it's safe to drop 32-bit support
most of the time.  I like that.  I won't have to build multiple sets of binaries,
and I won't have to deal with the Year 2038 problem. 
  
 It is interesting to wonder when, or if, 128-bit architectures will appear
(not in weird places, but in mainstream tech).  A 64-bit architecture can
address 16 EB (18,446,744,073,709,551,616 bytes).  That's enough address space
to memory-map the largest databases.  Obviously we can't say "never" (the
worst person in the
world famously said "640K ought to be enough for anybody") but if a move to
128-bit doesn't happen in the next 50 years then it's as good as "never" for
my purposes. 
  
 There's also the small matter of having to deal with 128 address lines and
128 data lines on the bus, but I suppose parallel busses are on their way
out, maybe even for RAM at some point. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670648</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 23:08:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670648</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670648@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>worst case ill ship you a nano or something :)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670647</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 22:52:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670647</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670647@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Cool, if that ever changes just yell.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Mar 09 2021 14:23:48 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>Never thought abut it, but hey IG: if you ever need access to arm <br />machines to test on,  let me know and ill stick a Jetson or </blockquote>
<br />Thanks for the offer. I'm good on ARM hardware for now, PD sent me an RPi 3 that I've been using to test those builds. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670619</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 19:23:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670619</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670619@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Never thought abut it, but hey IG: if you ever need access to arm  
 >machines to test on,  let me know and ill stick a Jetson or  
  
 Thanks for the offer.  I'm good on ARM hardware for now, PD sent me an RPi
3 that I've been using to test those builds. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670602</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 18:11:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670602</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670602@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>that should have said "latest citadel update"...</p>
<p>I know works already, and i have done it myself, but seeing the update just made me think of this :) </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Mar 09 2021 12:56:40 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Noticed the blurb about ARM support in latest citadel.</p>
<p>Never thought abut it, but hey IG: if you ever need access to arm machines to test on,  let me know and ill stick a Jetson or something on Guacamole and give you an account. </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670597</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 17:56:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670597</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670597@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Noticed the blurb about ARM support in latest citadel.</p>
<p>Never thought abut it, but hey IG: if you ever need access to arm machines to test on,  let me know and ill stick a Jetson or something on Guacamole and give you an account. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4670007</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 01:20:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4670007</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4670007@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Mar 02 2021 07:02:45 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">When you buy from Amazon, you're buying from HITLER!</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>You are correct, the cancel culture says so!<br />https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56266514<br />http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56266514</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669999</link><pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2021 00:39:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669999</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669999@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And supporting the destruction of countless acres of farmland for their damned warehouses.  They are destroying the town just beside me faster than you can blink. Its disgusting. They ran out a 3 generation fruit farm this last fall.  I think they are up to 5 or 6 buildings now. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Mar 02 2021 19:02:45 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">When you buy from Amazon, you're buying from HITLER! <br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669947</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 14:19:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669947</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669947@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2021-03-02 19:02 from IGnatius T Foobar   
 >When you buy from Amazon, you're buying from HITLER!   
 >    
 > I'll go out of my way to avoid Amazon.  We all have to do our part to 
 
 >help prevent a future where Jeff Bezos is the only person on the planet
 
 >who has a job.   
 >    
 > As for my tech purchases, I go to Micro Center.  They're a bit of a   
 >drive for me but it's worth it.   
 >   
 >  
  
 Consider yourself upvoted, liked, hashtagged, reshared, befriended and whatever
have you :) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669888</link><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2021 00:02:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669888</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669888@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[When you buy from Amazon, you're buying from HITLER! 
  
 I'll go out of my way to avoid Amazon.  We all have to do our part to help
prevent a future where Jeff Bezos is the only person on the planet who has
a job. 
  
 As for my tech purchases, I go to Micro Center.  They're a bit of a drive
for me but it's worth it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669575</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2021 13:21:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669575</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669575@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>lol fake libertarians</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669514</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 20:30:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669514</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669514@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Feb 25 2021 01:43:54 PM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=nonservator">nonservator</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>lol imagine calling Amazon a free market</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p>How did Amazon get so big?  People chose to shop there.  No one forced people to buy online instead of the local store.  The government didn't force Amazon on us.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669481</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:21:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669481</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669481@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I believe you are right. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Feb 26 2021 08:40:52 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I'm thinking they are a Kroger subsidiary now. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Feb 25 2021 23:59:50 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><br />Fry's is a Grocery Store and the Electronics giant in Phoenix. They're the same family. Two brothers. They're estranged. The one went out to San Jose and started the electronics store. They use almost the same font for their logos. It is confusing - but they're not related as merchants. <br /><br /></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;"> </span></div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669470</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:40:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669470</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669470@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I'm thinking they are a Kroger subsidiary now. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Feb 25 2021 23:59:50 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><br />Fry's is a Grocery Store and the Electronics giant in Phoenix. They're the same family. Two brothers. They're estranged. The one went out to San Jose and started the electronics store. They use almost the same font for their logos. It is confusing - but they're not related as merchants. <br /><br /></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;"> </span></div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669469</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 13:39:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669469</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669469@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ah, so it was a buy-out not a rename. They did seem like the same sort of store, so it made sense it was just a name change.   I olny went back once, long after the name change and after i saw the prices compared to their own online prices, and still remembering how i was treated before, i bailed and went down to the east side of town to a real electronic supplier, and paid 1/2 their price ( i needed cable to run in an office at the last minute ).  Fool me once.         The other store closed up couple of years ago. Some 40 years in business. Sad day.  </p>
<p>Not been to Microcenter in person, but driven past once on my way back home from a meeting in Cinci.  Looked like a good sized building, but i was flying past on i74 and didnt feel like stopping just to window shop. Bought some filament from them for my printer a few times, mail order.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669401</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 04:59:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669401</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669401@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Incredible Universe was a different gig. They were owned by Tandy, I think. CompUSA was a big box competitor at the time, too - and all basically fought in the same space. Best Buy came along and went, "let's make this a little more upscale. We'll charge more, but our Blueshirts will at least be friendly - and we won't carry no-name Chinese shit." <br /><br />When Incredible Universe failed, Fry's bought a lot of their stores. <br /><br />On your coast, if you've been to Micro Center - that is pretty much like Fry's computer department, except Fry's is huge and sells soda, has a snack bar, has aisles of general electronics gear, weird toys... a record section, exercise gear, drones... shavers and personal groomers, massage chairs... it IS a geek wonderland - and there won't be any place like it once it is gone. <br /><br />Fry's is a Grocery Store and the Electronics giant in Phoenix. They're the same family. Two brothers. They're estranged. The one went out to San Jose and started the electronics stor
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Feb 25 2021 18:11:32 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I know i mentioned it before, but they were the ones that sold me the wrong, old crusty video card that was broke in 1/2 and was shrink wrapped. i think anyway. The place was called 'incredible universe' at the time, but years later the sign changed to Fry.   Donno if it was the same company or just the same building/concept.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669400</link><pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2021 04:51:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669400</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669400@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Bezos has gotten a bunch of small business men to work at his beck and call, as his unpaid employees - and gotten them to take on all the liabilities. <br /><br />If you can come up with a better idea - a lot of them would be willing to make you as rich as Bezos, too. <br /><br /><br /></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Feb 25 2021 18:11:52 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>That was my thought too</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Feb 25 2021 13:43:54 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=nonservator">nonservator</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>lol imagine calling Amazon a free market</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669374</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:11:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669374</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669374@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That was my thought too</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Feb 25 2021 13:43:54 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=nonservator">nonservator</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>lol imagine calling Amazon a free market</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669373</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:11:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669373</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669373@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I know i mentioned it before, but they were the ones that sold me the wrong, old crusty video card that was broke in 1/2 and was shrink wrapped. i think anyway. The place was called 'incredible universe' at the time, but years later the sign changed to Fry.   Donno if it was the same company or just the same building/concept.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669349</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:25:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669349</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669349@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Their open box returns were notorious, their return process was a hassle. Their sales guys were hostile *and* uninformed. <br /><br />It was kind of like an Easter Egg hunt trying to figure out where the great sale item might be hidden in the store. <br /><br />Amazon offered all the cheap - with far fewer of the hassles. <br /><br />And Fry's drove out Mom and Pops tech stores when they arrived. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669348</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 19:23:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669348</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669348@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Fry's spent a lot of time murdering themselves. <br /><br />Part of the problem was they made a reputation for selling cheap, gray market Chinese crap for CHEAP. I once bought a pair of headphones from Fry's, thought they were a wonderful price for Sony... got all the way home and realized they were "Coby". <br /><br /><img src="https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fd3nevzfk7ii3be.cloudfront.net%2Figi%2F1Weys3PJX1TCsd2v.large&amp;f=1&amp;nofb=1" alt="Coby Tablet Repair - iFixit" /></p>
<p><img src="https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fbloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com%2Felpopularnews.com%2Fcontent%2Ftncms%2Fassets%2Fv3%2Feditorial%2F2%2F15%2F2155f3f2-2762-5293-b7a9-e875cb337bf5%2F60351d5f9655e.image.jpg&amp;f=1&amp;nofb=1" alt="Sony Electronics Launches FX3 Full-Frame Camera for Cinematic Look and Enhanced Operability for ..." /></p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669327</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:43:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669327</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669327@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>lol imagine calling Amazon a free market</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669311</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:54:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669311</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669311@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The one here felt more like a larger best buy, with more selection.  But often times their online prices weer WAY lower.  Buyer beware.  </p>
<p>I wonder if they will keep their online presence. Or if the entire company is folding. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Feb 25 2021 09:21:47 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />Not sure where to post this, but I suppose some of you have already heard ... <br /><br />Fry's Electronics is closing all of its stores. Another retail icon murdered in cold blood by Amazon. <br /><br />I've heard wonderful things about Fry's but as a northeasterner I've never been to one. And now I suppose I never will. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669310</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:22:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669310</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669310@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And yes, i'm a sucker.  the 7.8" color reader is on its way.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>/me kicks himself.  Now its time to sell off a couple of my other ones to recoup some of the frivolous spending of late.   ( not that spending an extra 350 is going to make a difference, but i'm trying not to totally waste money out of principle )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669288</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 15:27:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669288</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669288@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Feb 25 2021 09:21:47 AM EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />Fry's Electronics is closing all of its stores. Another retail icon lost to the<strong> FREE MARKET</strong>.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>FTFY</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I am sure I purchased my first HD (720p) video camera from them, online purchase.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669283</link><pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2021 14:21:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669283</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669283@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Not sure where to post this, but I suppose some of you have already heard
... 
  
 Fry's Electronics is closing all of its stores.   Another retail icon murdered
in cold blood by Amazon. 
  
 I've heard wonderful things about Fry's but as a northeasterner I've never
been to one.   And now I suppose I never will. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4669091</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:15:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4669091</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4669091@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>For me, i dont like reading on LCD, it wears out my eyes after enough time with the constant glow. E-ink is a world of difference. Its a totally different technology.  I was a super early adopter.  However, until now if i needed color, LCD was it.  Now there is a widely availble option. ( previous attempts at color a few years ago, was mostly in Russia, and was not very good )</p>
<p>Note that not all use android. PB for example is their own OS.  But, its a reader, not a tablet replacement of any kind so i dont see that being a big deal.  I hear people complain all the time " refresh rate is too slow .. bla bla.   cant watch a video"  um, no, you cant, to buy a tablet instead and watch your cat videos.. </p>
<p>For writing, you can get various screen protectors with different textures. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>( and i still think its funny i was trying to make what became e-eink, back in the 80s..   using static electricity to move ink droplets around to make a display..  same basic concept . another missed boat for me :) )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Feb 22 2021 08:48:05 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=DutchessMike">DutchessMike</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I took a look - they are interesting devices, and, as the prices fall, my interest rises.  My Galaxy Tab is overkill for taking notes and reading ePUB books.  This could be a lighter, more energy-efficient way of reading on a larger (than my phones) device without needing a full-blown mobile OS (even though they do use Android) and a 5G connection.  Note-taking, depending on how the screen feels and the application they use, could be a better experience.  I find that the softer screens that these e-ink devices use are easier to write on (for me).</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4668976</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2021 13:48:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4668976</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4668976@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I took a look - they are interesting devices, and, as the prices fall, my interest rises.  My Galaxy Tab is overkill for taking notes and reading ePUB books.  This could be a lighter, more energy-efficient way of reading on a larger (than my phones) device without needing a full-blown mobile OS (even though they do use Android) and a 5G connection.  Note-taking, depending on how the screen feels and the application they use, could be a better experience.  I find that the softer screens that these e-ink devices use are easier to write on (for me).</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4650776</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 21:54:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4650776</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4650776@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Figures.. Gen 2 screen @ 7.9" just came out.  and only $330... </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4649666</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2021 15:22:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4649666</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4649666@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh, im sure it was. sex sells. Even when it makes no sense to associate it to a product.  But being who i am i didnt even notice the actual content, i just noticed the colors.. tech first :)    But then i noticed the price..  arrgh.     I guess there is now an 8" version. Which i think for most things the best size, but its 500+   </p>
<p>Perhaps in a generation or 2 the price would be justifiable, but having a 6", the Gen 1 color devices have a use case, but are not quite ready to replace a grey scale ink device for general use.  </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Feb 07 2021 09:40:15 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I think most of that was intentional. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Feb 06 2021 10:52:55 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Yeah, they should have chosen anything other than Cosmopolitan as the sample image.</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4649659</link><pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2021 14:40:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4649659</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4649659@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I think most of that was intentional. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Feb 06 2021 10:52:55 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Yeah, they should have chosen anything other than Cosmopolitan as the sample image. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4649562</link><pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2021 15:52:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4649562</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4649562@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Yeah, they should have chosen anything other than Cosmopolitan as the sample
image. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4647545</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 13:06:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4647545</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4647545@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>lol</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Jan 23 2021 06:23:09 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zooer">zooer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I looked at that page, saw "SEX POLL" as "SEX DOLL", thought the product was a Britney Spears sex doll and wondered why you were looking that up.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4647538</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 11:23:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4647538</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4647538@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I looked at that page, saw "SEX POLL" as "SEX DOLL", thought the product was a Britney Spears sex doll and wondered why you were looking that up.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4647515</link><pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2021 02:02:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4647515</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4647515@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Arrgh. 1k is a bit steep.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>https://goodereader.com/blog/product/bigme-b1-pro-color-e-ink-10-3-inch-e-note-with-free-case</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4645624</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2021 15:39:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4645624</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4645624@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Con artists are always running cons. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Jan 14 2021 09:58:57 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=IGnatius T Foobar">IGnatius T Foobar</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Heh.  Reminds me of a gift I received some number of years ago, an immersion blender that was purchased at Target.  When I opened it up, what came out was someone's old broken appliance that had been put into the box and resealed.  The person who gave me the gift was horrified, and then had to go to the store and explain that this really happened.  (Fortunately the store accepted the story.)</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4645612</link><pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2021 14:58:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4645612</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4645612@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Heh.  Reminds me of a gift I received some number of years ago, an immersion blender that was purchased at Target.  When I opened it up, what came out was someone's old broken appliance that had been put into the box and resealed.  The person who gave me the gift was horrified, and then had to go to the store and explain that this really happened.  (Fortunately the store accepted the story.)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4645250</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 01:01:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4645250</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4645250@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I'm not really an EE background - but as soon as my friend described, "It is called a Field Programmable Gate Array, it recreates the circuit logic at the hardware level," I knew it was probably going to be good. I understand that is basically what emulation is trying to do in a virtual machine abstraction layer - but you know how I feel about bare metal. ;) </p>
<p>The more I've learned about it - the more it makes sense - for example, it is creating all the discreet subsystems and running them in parallel, where emulation uses brute force to run them sequentially so fast you shouldn't notice. Either can achieve cycle accuracy, theoretically - but there will always be inherent bottlenecks with emulation. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jan 12 2021 19:13:49 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Coming from an EE background, i love FPGA. I tried in a way to emulate them ( before they existed ) using EPROMS and truth tables. I was doing a lot of bread boarding, and thinking...</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4645244</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 00:13:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4645244</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4645244@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Coming from an EE background, i love FPGA. I tried in a way to emulate them ( before they existed ) using EPROMS and truth tables. I was doing a lot of bread boarding, and thinking, why am i doing this the hard way? its all predicable logic, i can do that with a look up table.. hey, an EProm does that..*ding* the light came on. Sure may take more than one to get the 'width' but i build the board once. .change it as i need on the fly. Perhaps not as fast, but fast enough.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>An FPGA i can get for under 10 bucks now that is basically throw away, id have killed for back in the 80s..</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4645223</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 22:21:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4645223</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4645223@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Absolutely true. I am guilty of also tossing items that I now regret. It has made me afraid to toss anything. :) <br /><br />Worse thing I ever dumped was a nearly complete collection of 1st edition, red-stripe hotwheels in pretty good condition. Some of those go for tens of thousands of dollars now, and even in beat up condition, have a couple of zeros after their asking price. <br /><br />Some boyfriend of my sister who was a kid in the 60s gave them to me, and I in turn sold them to someone at a garage sale for $50 in 1987. <br /><br />FPGA is currently making a lot of retro hardware collectors dump their original hardware. FPGA is really, really good. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jan 12 2021 16:19:46 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>this was also 20 years ago, an apple ][ was not worth stripping and hoping the parts were ok. </p>
<p>Today, might be a different case. Tomorrow, might not matter too. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jan 12 2021 15:26:43 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4645202</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 21:19:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4645202</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4645202@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>this was also 20 years ago, an apple ][ was not worth stripping and hoping the parts were ok. </p>
<p>Today, might be a different case. Tomorrow, might not matter too. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jan 12 2021 15:26:43 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I understand too - but seriously - people have gotten to the point where they'll buy busted out systems with cracked cases and missing keycaps, *just* for the plungers or parts that might be salvageable. <br />I suppose it has become kind of like an automotive junkyard - where a thing that has been out and rusting in the elements for 40 years might still have value, just because it is a place to START on building a replacement part to even have a bad ORIGINAL part... <br /><br />The only system that hasn't had much interest and still goes bargain priced seems to be the TI 99 4/A... They're easy to come by. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jan 12 2021 13:50:23 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Right, but this stuff was no where near that. Sad to see them destroyed, but a dime a dozen. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4645180</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 20:26:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4645180</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4645180@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I understand too - but seriously - people have gotten to the point where they'll buy busted out systems with cracked cases and missing keycaps, *just* for the plungers or parts that might be salvageable. <br />I suppose it has become kind of like an automotive junkyard - where a thing that has been out and rusting in the elements for 40 years might still have value, just because it is a place to START on building a replacement part to even have a bad ORIGINAL part... <br /><br />The only system that hasn't had much interest and still goes bargain priced seems to be the TI 99 4/A... They're easy to come by. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jan 12 2021 13:50:23 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Right, but this stuff was no where near that. Sad to see them destroyed, but a dime a dozen. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4645155</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 18:50:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4645155</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4645155@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Right, but this stuff was no where near that. Sad to see them destroyed, but a dime a dozen. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jan 12 2021 10:38:03 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>High end later Amiga systems have been going recently for as much as $3000. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4645116</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:38:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4645116</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4645116@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>High end later Amiga systems have been going recently for as much as $3000. <br /><br />A complete Commodore 64 system with a couple drives and display can bring in $400. <br /><br />My Amiga systems will sell all day at $700. <br /><br />Prices are insane. It is part of these kids getting into the hobby - but also, supply is very spare, now. <br /><br />And I think a lot of the folks who restore the systems do it as a hobby - not really for a profit motive. Maybe a passion too... you should look at some of the "restored this C128 found in the skip," type videos. So... the challenge - I guess.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jan 12 2021 07:48:30 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<p>While i agree in concept that 'anything can be done in theory', even if they could be brought back to life, the value/cost ratio would have made it ludicrous.  its not like it was skids of Altair 8080's or something.  </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 19:01:33 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content"><br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4645081</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:48:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4645081</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4645081@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>As a whole, we are talking about rusted off traces, cracked plastic ( water soaked freeze/thaw cycles ) and a lot were caked solid with acidic barn poo. They spent at least one winter out there, most likely several. And no clue if any of it was working before it was auctioned off anyway... The auction must have been a decade or 2 after they were retired.,</p>
<p>While i agree in concept that 'anything can be done in theory', even if they could be brought back to life, the value/cost ratio would have made it ludicrous.  its not like it was skids of Altair 8080's or something.  </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 19:01:33 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Dead stuff will still sell today - or at least, you'll find someone who fixes it. These guys repair multi-layer circuitboards with surface mounted components that were originally placed with a pic-n-pull placer, these days. There are YouTube tutorials on how to learn how to do it, and I swear, these guys - the way you talk, you can tell some of them don't actually know what they're doing, they're just following along with tutorials. Some of the guys who fix this stuff are experts, though.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 13:49:31 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content"><br /><br />
<p>Sad day really, several ][C+, some GS, even some laser clones.   All trashed. And hundreds more in the barn im sure. several skids worth. The 2 monitors they pulled out of the side building were ok. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4644974</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2021 00:01:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4644974</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4644974@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Dead stuff will still sell today - or at least, you'll find someone who fixes it. These guys repair multi-layer circuitboards with surface mounted components that were originally placed with a pic-n-pull placer, these days. There are YouTube tutorials on how to learn how to do it, and I swear, these guys - the way you talk, you can tell some of them don't actually know what they're doing, they're just following along with tutorials. Some of the guys who fix this stuff are experts, though.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 13:49:31 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content"><br /><br />
<p>Sad day really, several ][C+, some GS, even some laser clones.   All trashed. And hundreds more in the barn im sure. several skids worth. The 2 monitors they pulled out of the side building were ok. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4644890</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 18:49:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4644890</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4644890@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>LOL</p>
<p> </p>
<p>When i was still collecting i had 2 story telling events: ( both a good 20 years ago now )</p>
<p>Guy on one of the usenet groups i was in decided to do a dump, sort of like i did later. " first one to call, gets it all" ( bunch of apple ][ stuff ). I was of course it. Was in another state, 3 hour drive.  Was 2/3 of the way there, thinking, WTF am i doing.. driving to some dudes house on my own out in the idle of Kentucky some where..  Of course i was armed.. but still.   Turned out well. Nice area, and ended up with a car load full stuff, real nice guy. Retired school teacher.</p>
<p>Another was on a YT "freecycle" list, some people had got some skids from a local school auction and was giving it all away. Local this time, just across the state. Turned out to be WAY in the boonies. drove up, chickens in yard, goat in the driveway i had to wait on, the works. ( not judging, i like farmer types. just setting the stage ).  I get there and out of the blue these 3 late teenage country girls show up with a look on their face " look, its a man "..  Really nice and friendly people.  Felt bad for them when they announced, 'we had these in the barn"... yep all totally ruined as it was an *active* barn and open to elements too.  "we have a couple of those tv screen things in this building over here" .  Girl opened the window, hopped in and waked across the acres of 'stuff' in the building, and handed me a couple of RBG monitors.  I still filled up the van with stuff making it look like more than it was, "well, i'm full, but i really appreciate this" and it totally made their day. Grinning 
<p>On the way home, swung by the dump and car wash.</p>
<p>Sad day really, several ][C+, some GS, even some laser clones.   All trashed. And hundreds more in the barn im sure. several skids worth. The 2 monitors they pulled out of the side building were ok. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 12:51:40 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: #ffffff; color: #000000; font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">So... the Pi 400 is kind of a homage to classic retro computing - and lends itself to modern platforms being used to relive classic retro computing experiences - without the hassles of - you know... meeting some dude with BO and a beard in a parking lot to complete a Craigslist sale for 30 year old computer equipment that might not work, and could possibly introduce vermin into your home. :) </span> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4644878</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 17:51:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4644878</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4644878@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>How about this... <br /><br />It is taking a fuel injection kit and wrapping it up in the aesthetics of a 4 barrel carb so that your engine LOOKS classic while delivering better performance. Sometimes those "gimmick things" work. Other times, they're fail - like the sound cards that used fake "tubes" that were aimed at audiophiles but were really just a cheap attempt to cash in on "steam punk" aesthetics. <br /><br />It is about aesthetics. It is a retro-inspired aesthetic. It is the superficial finish of a theme park that aims to convince you you're in the Andes or the Himalayans or the Amazon Basin, even though you're in a drained swamp in the middle of Florida. <br /><br />That is why all the modern pony cars have lines that take aesthetics from the classic muscle of the 60s and 70s. They're typically not remotely like the original cars as far as engineering goes. They're using lighter metals, they've got crumple zones, they've got advanced electronics and ODBC-II and computer controlled timing and 
<p> <br /><br /><br /></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 10:23:26 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Inspired by ill agree with you. but its still modern hardware. </p>
<p>Since you used the car analogy ( i do often ) its like comparing a 4bbl carb to direct injection.. Sure, both are supplying fuel, but its hard to compare the two.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Back OT tho, the pinebooks are sort of like that 400 ( + screen ) as they use socketed RK somm modules. much as the PI uses the A-whatever 'compute module' ( A7? ). I forget who tried that first, a laptop with a user upgradable module. It didnt last long tho. might have been PCMCIA based, i really dont remember now.  Its too bad there is no standard connection for all these modules.  Then you could chose your 'box' then decide what CPU/GPU/Ram/etc you need for your particular project.  But i know, that is silly talk, 'universal hardware' cant lock you into a particular vendor.</p>
<p>Sort of like the friendlyarm modules i have. same form factor as NVIDIA jetson, but NOT the pin-out. Would be a great 'instant upgrade' path for a project. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 10:07:50 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>No. The "All-in-One" format is a "retro design" though that hasn't been common. All the modern All-in-One machines put the brains in the LCD and still have a detachable keyboard. <br /><br />The Pi400 is Retro the same way a modern Camero is retro - the design cues are retro. If you put a modern Amiga distro like AmigaPi on it, where it boots up into a Workbench Amiga and hides all the Linux - you've got a "modern classic Amiga," in a design aesthetic that reinforces the illusion. <br /><br />At $100... opening it reminded me of the Timex Sinclair that used to sell at the grocery store for $100 that had 4k of RAM that I wanted so badly around 1980. Except, the Pi 400 has far better quality components and cost the absolute same in 2020 dollars as he Sinclair cost in 1980 dollars. Adjusted for the 1980s, the Pi 400 is a $20 computer. <br /><br />with 4GB of RAM and a quad core processor and 16GB of storage default. But there is a legacy, a heritage, a history back to that machine that is clear... and cool.<
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 07:53:03 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content"><br />
<p>And i agree old/new is becoming a blur for 'using' but PI type hardware isn't retro..</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Jan 10 2021 20:40:34 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">I suppose shrink wrap doesn't really mean anything though.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4644847</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:23:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4644847</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4644847@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Inspired by ill agree with you. but its still modern hardware. </p>
<p>Since you used the car analogy ( i do often ) its like comparing a 4bbl carb to direct injection.. Sure, both are supplying fuel, but its hard to compare the two.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Back OT tho, the pinebooks are sort of like that 400 ( + screen ) as they use socketed RK somm modules. much as the PI uses the A-whatever 'compute module' ( A7? ). I forget who tried that first, a laptop with a user upgradable module. It didnt last long tho. might have been PCMCIA based, i really dont remember now.  Its too bad there is no standard connection for all these modules.  Then you could chose your 'box' then decide what CPU/GPU/Ram/etc you need for your particular project.  But i know, that is silly talk, 'universal hardware' cant lock you into a particular vendor.</p>
<p>Sort of like the friendlyarm modules i have. same form factor as NVIDIA jetson, but NOT the pin-out. Would be a great 'instant upgrade' path for a project. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 10:07:50 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>No. The "All-in-One" format is a "retro design" though that hasn't been common. All the modern All-in-One machines put the brains in the LCD and still have a detachable keyboard. <br /><br />The Pi400 is Retro the same way a modern Camero is retro - the design cues are retro. If you put a modern Amiga distro like AmigaPi on it, where it boots up into a Workbench Amiga and hides all the Linux - you've got a "modern classic Amiga," in a design aesthetic that reinforces the illusion. <br /><br />At $100... opening it reminded me of the Timex Sinclair that used to sell at the grocery store for $100 that had 4k of RAM that I wanted so badly around 1980. Except, the Pi 400 has far better quality components and cost the absolute same in 2020 dollars as he Sinclair cost in 1980 dollars. Adjusted for the 1980s, the Pi 400 is a $20 computer. <br /><br />with 4GB of RAM and a quad core processor and 16GB of storage default. But there is a legacy, a heritage, a history back to that machine that is clear... and cool.<
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 07:53:03 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content"><br />
<p>And i agree old/new is becoming a blur for 'using' but PI type hardware isn't retro..</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Jan 10 2021 20:40:34 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">I suppose shrink wrap doesn't really mean anything though.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4644839</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:09:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4644839</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4644839@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I've got one. ;)</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 08:03:56 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=zooer">zooer</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Shrink wrap machine's cost less than $100, very cheap.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4644838</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 15:07:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4644838</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4644838@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>No. The "All-in-One" format is a "retro design" though that hasn't been common. All the modern All-in-One machines put the brains in the LCD and still have a detachable keyboard. <br /><br />The Pi400 is Retro the same way a modern Camero is retro - the design cues are retro. If you put a modern Amiga distro like AmigaPi on it, where it boots up into a Workbench Amiga and hides all the Linux - you've got a "modern classic Amiga," in a design aesthetic that reinforces the illusion. <br /><br />At $100... opening it reminded me of the Timex Sinclair that used to sell at the grocery store for $100 that had 4k of RAM that I wanted so badly around 1980. Except, the Pi 400 has far better quality components and cost the absolute same in 2020 dollars as he Sinclair cost in 1980 dollars. Adjusted for the 1980s, the Pi 400 is a $20 computer. <br /><br />with 4GB of RAM and a quad core processor and 16GB of storage default. But there is a legacy, a heritage, a history back to that machine that is clear... and cool.<
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jan 11 2021 07:53:03 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=Nurb432">Nurb432</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content"><br />
<p>And i agree old/new is becoming a blur for 'using' but PI type hardware isn't retro..</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Jan 10 2021 20:40:34 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">I suppose shrink wrap doesn't really mean anything though.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4644810</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 13:03:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4644810</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4644810@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Shrink wrap machine's cost less than $100, very cheap.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4644808</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 12:53:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4644808</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4644808@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Back in the early 90s i saved up for a new VESA video card ( the dark days for me, I had made a bad career/life decision and had not yet crawled out of the hole i dug, ( and freaking jumped into it, head first ) and went to the closest 'incredible universe', about an hour away  ( later to become Fry's ) </p>
<p>Was in shrinkrwap with vendor stickers on it. </p>
<p>Got home, it was broken in 1/2, covered in dirt and dust and all the packing removed but taped to the box so it wouldn't rattle. They said i was trying to pull a fast one on them, no proof, and I had to threaten to sue them to get a refund.   From then on, i used credit cards for everything. </p>
<p>And i agree old/new is becoming a blur for 'using' but PI type hardware isn't retro..</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Jan 10 2021 20:40:34 EST</span> <span>from <a href="do_template?template=user_show?who=ParanoidDelusions">ParanoidDelusions</a> </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">I suppose shrink wrap doesn't really mean anything though.</span></p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4644713</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 01:40:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4644713</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4644713@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And from a security perspective, it comes in an open box, no shrink wrap, easy to open, with an SD card preloaded with an OS on it. <br /><br />These devices are an NSA wet dream. <br /><br />"Hook it right up to your network and turn it on. Trust us."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I suppose shrink wrap doesn't really mean anything though. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4644710</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 01:38:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4644710</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4644710@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Too tried to even really open it up and set it up, though. <br /><br />So I just have it sitting here mocking me. <br /><br /><img src="
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4644708</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2021 01:33:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4644708</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4644708@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>My Pi400 arrived today. Not sure how it beat your Pi 3B+ to you - but UPS says it should be arriving tomorrow. I did give it to a sketchy looking guy in a Budget Truck with a UPS sticker slapped on the side as he dropped a package off at my house - and he didn't scan it in, give me any receipt. After I watched it drive off I thought, "That guy is going to open that package, look at it, and throw it in the trash..." <br /><br />But it looks like it'll get there... So you'll have lots of toys to play with this week.<br /><br />Me too. Not sure what I'm going to do with it yet. Probably put RetroPi on it, or an Amiga emulation distro...</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I feel like this is one of those devices, Eventually there is going to be some project for it that I want to try, and it will be after they're all sold out, and they'll be scalping them on eBay. <br /><br />For $115 shipped... I'm sure I'll figure something out to do with it. <br /><br />I think I'm in line for a Vampire V4 standalone too. That is 575 Euro. That is a little bit steeper for something to have just because I don't want to NOT have it once it is out of production... But... I think I might jump on that, too.</p>
<p>Hard to say if these posts belong here or in ancient computing. Modern hardware doing ancient computing.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4634554</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 22:42:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4634554</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4634554@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>:)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4634475</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2020 19:12:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4634475</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4634475@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >Or bodies.   
  
 The difference between golf clubs and dead bodies is that the golf clubs
will become less useful if you chop them into smaller pieces to fit them into
your trunk. 
  
 Of course, if the golf clubs were involved in the situation that made you
have to deal with dead bodies, then it's probably ok to dispose of both. 
But you really don't want to mess up your nice CD changer. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4633391</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2020 01:34:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4633391</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4633391@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>wow, i had totally forgot i had a sansa for a while. Looked like one of these, had like 16gb intenral i think, and some sort of mSD card i stuck in there ( forget the size ).  I liked the interface it had.  When i switched to using my phone i missed the simple 'wheel' ( actually, i did like the iPod interface too, just the rest of the apple ecosystem i hated ).  That was after the apple, and before phone.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/G/01/electronics/detail-page/sansa-e200-size.jpg" alt="Amazon.com: SanDisk Sansa e280 8 GB MP3 Player (Black): Sansa Connect: Home  Audio &amp; Theater" /></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4633389</link><pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2020 01:00:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4633389</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4633389@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Dec 19 2020 08:23:50 AM EST</span> <span>from Nurb432</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>My beef was 5 or 6 CDs didnt go far, unless you made them yourself.  And if i remember right, mine refused to read CDr disks so no way to filter out the 'fluff' tracks wasting space.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p><br />I will agree with this, I had a single CD player along with CD storage attached to my visor.  I was swapping CDs far too often and board with the CDs I had.<br />Currently, I have a Sandisk sport plugged into the AUX port of my car stereo, it has MP3 player has 1,600 songs on it.  It seems to pick the same songs frequently in shuffle mode.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4633379</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 23:15:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4633379</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4633379@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I used Sony mini disks for a long time too.  Before phones had enough storage. Went from the Sony to a Palm T/X + memory card for a bit, but I did end up with a Gen3 iPod, purely due to the storage size. I hated the iTunes nonsense, tho i did find a 3rd party tool to load it. And having to use their stupid fire-wire power pack if you ever reset it.. Really apple?   </p>
<p>Trying to do something similar in the late 80s with 'direct synth of music' using wave tables and such ( which never did work out.. not practical given the hardware of the day ) made me an early adopter of mp3, i wish i had kept my first gen RIO, with the DB25 parallel port cable.  Worthless now of course but neat to have in the 'retro junk box'.. it would hold an entire CD on a 'tiny flash card', some what mind blowing for a person that grew up with 8" floppies and tape.. Sure not same quality level as a cd ( we already comprised going from analog to digital anyway ) but a more than acceptable trade off for no moving parts, and battery life. And i could see eventually getting larger cards so you could carry around several CDs worth of music at once ( never dreamed of TB cards tho...  )</p>
<p>I bought all my CDs tho.. i still do. i like to support the artists. ( and since they are indi, they get most of the $ )</p>
<p>Back when tech was still fun and not just 'yet another toaster'. I miss those days. That was around the time i got burnt out, it was becoming a 'commercialized drag'. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Dec 19 2020 12:40:38 EST</span> <span>from ParanoidDelusions </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Yeah, the quest to get your entire MP3 collection from USENET into your car was a thing between 1994 and whenever Creative and Apple came out with the iPod and Xen Jukebox and changed everything. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Dec 19 2020 08:23:50 EST</span> <span>from Nurb432 </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Or bodies.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My beef was 5 or 6 CDs didnt go far, unless you made them yourself.  And if i remember right, mine refused to read CDr disks so no way to filter out the 'fluff' tracks wasting space.</p>
<p>One car i had ( dont remember which, or if it was even an OEM stereo ) would read music on a DVDr.  4gb of music was plenty to not have to swap it often.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4633307</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 17:40:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4633307</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4633307@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yeah, the quest to get your entire MP3 collection from USENET into your car was a thing between 1994 and whenever Creative and Apple came out with the iPod and Xen Jukebox and changed everything. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Dec 19 2020 08:23:50 EST</span> <span>from Nurb432 </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Or bodies.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My beef was 5 or 6 CDs didnt go far, unless you made them yourself.  And if i remember right, mine refused to read CDr disks so no way to filter out the 'fluff' tracks wasting space.</p>
<p>One car i had ( dont remember which, or if it was even an OEM stereo ) would read music on a DVDr.  4gb of music was plenty to not have to swap it often.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4633242</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 13:23:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4633242</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4633242@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Or bodies.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My beef was 5 or 6 CDs didnt go far, unless you made them yourself.  And if i remember right, mine refused to read CDr disks so no way to filter out the 'fluff' tracks wasting space.</p>
<p>One car i had ( dont remember which, or if it was even an OEM stereo ) would read music on a DVDr.  4gb of music was plenty to not have to swap it often.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4633062</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 03:32:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4633062</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4633062@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>This was absolutely the point. Of course, it meant you couldn't get as many golf clubs in your trunk. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Dec 18 2020 20:16:03 EST</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>One of my Chryslers had that, it was in the trunk.  Rather pointless <br />if you ask me.   My eldo, it was an option i think ( that i didnt </blockquote>
<br />I think the point of putting it in the trunk is that it was bulky and if you had a bunch of CDs loaded then you didn't need to change them while driving. <br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4633041</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Dec 2020 01:16:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4633041</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4633041@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >One of my Chryslers had that, it was in the trunk.  Rather pointless  
 >if you ask me.   My eldo, it was an option i think ( that i didnt  
  
 I think the point of putting it in the trunk is that it was bulky and if
you had a bunch of CDs loaded then you didn't need to change them while driving.
 It got the job done, I suppose.   By the time I had a car with any CD player
at all in it, we were pretty much past the age of CDs anyway. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4631952</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 16:21:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4631952</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4631952@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Dec 17 2020 08:22:32 AM EST</span> <span>from Nurb432 </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Mine was a pioneer.  So was the tuner, turntable, cassette deck, EQ.   One remote to rule them all! </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Thinking about it, Panasonic didn't sound correct, mine was a Pioneer as well.    Made a lot of noise switching CDs in the shuffle mode.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4631873</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 15:09:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4631873</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4631873@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I still have a dual cassette deck in my home sound system. It was here when we bought the house, and I feel like it was a little bonus. :) <br /><br /><br />I think I've used it once. <br /><br /><br />Anyhow... in the 90's we had that Sharper Image unit that had like a 50 CD changer. It was the original shuffle device. It was pretty awesome at parties.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4631742</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 13:22:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4631742</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4631742@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Mine was a pioneer.  So was the tuner, turntable, cassette deck, EQ.   One remote to rule them all! </p>
<p>Over time, i got rid of everything but the tuner, as it has a built in classA amp. now my little android box is hooked to it. no more cds, records, dvds...   Thought about dumping the tuner too for a small classD amp with built in BT and line in, but figured why bother, this works and its not like i need to save the space.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Dec 16 2020 20:30:29 EST</span> <span>from zooer </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I had a six CD magazine system for my home system, made a lot of noise when it switched CDs. I think it was made by Panasonic, but I don't remember.  There was an auto version where the magazine would go into a unit mounted in the trunk.  If I remember correctly you put the CDs in data side up.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4631276</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 01:30:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4631276</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4631276@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I had a six CD magazine system for my home system, made a lot of noise when it switched CDs. I think it was made by Panasonic, but I don't remember.  There was an auto version where the magazine would go into a unit mounted in the trunk.  If I remember correctly you put the CDs in data side up.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4631253</link><pubDate>Thu, 17 Dec 2020 00:16:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4631253</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4631253@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>One of my Chryslers had that, it was in the trunk.  Rather pointless if you ask me.   My eldo, it was an option i think ( that i didnt get ).  </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Had a home deck that took the carts too. Fun times.</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Dec 16 2020 09:50:04 EST</span> <span>from ParanoidDelusions </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>My wife had one, I think it was in a Land Rover discovery - where the changer was a whole separate box somewhere else in the car. I don't remember much about it, what car it was... but I have a vague memory of it having these caddies and being about the size of a shoebox. </p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4631037</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 16:39:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4631037</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4631037@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >There isn't an AUX plug, but it is interesting that it had a six CD  
 >player with a cassette deck.  
  
 My son's Camry has the same head unit but without the CD changer.  The wiring
harness for the CD changer has an audio input in it, of course.  That's where
you plug in the aftermarket Bluetooth kit (example at https://tinyurl.com/ybjtq64p
but that's not the exact one we got).  It works *flawlessly* and it sits completely
inside the dashboard behind the head unit; there aren't any dangling wires
at all.  If there's such a thing as an elegant hack, this is it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4630954</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 14:50:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4630954</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4630954@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>My wife had one, I think it was in a Land Rover discovery - where the changer was a whole separate box somewhere else in the car. I don't remember much about it, what car it was... but I have a vague memory of it having these caddies and being about the size of a shoebox. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4630866</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 13:02:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4630866</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4630866@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The one i removed from my jeep last summer had a 5 disk player, and cassette.  No fancy stuff tho. But it did have cooling fans, which i have never seen before.   ( 2006 )</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Dec 15 2020 10:42:04 EST</span> <span>from zooer </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I looked at my mother's 2005 Toyota, her car stereo had a cassette tape, a *SIX* CD player, a button labeled "TRAF" and a button labeled "SAT".  I have no idea how it connected to traffic reports or how the satellite worked.</p>
<p>There isn't an AUX plug, but it is interesting that it had a six CD player with a cassette deck.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4630358</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2020 01:11:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4630358</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4630358@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>These were absolutely a thing at some point. They were kind of a hassle, and you inevitably lost 4-6 of your CDs when you traded in your car. But if you bought a used one, you also usually got a bonus 4-6 CDs with the purchase. <br /><br />Often, Phil Collins was part of this trade. </p>
<p><br /><br /></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Dec 15 2020 10:42:04 EST</span> <span>from zooer </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I looked at my mother's 2005 Toyota, her car stereo had a cassette tape, a *SIX* CD player, a button labeled "TRAF" and a button labeled "SAT".  I have no idea how it connected to traffic reports or how the satellite worked.</p>
<p>There isn't an AUX plug, but it is interesting that it had a six CD player with a cassette deck.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4630098</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 15:42:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4630098</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4630098@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I looked at my mother's 2005 Toyota, her car stereo had a cassette tape, a *SIX* CD player, a button labeled "TRAF" and a button labeled "SAT".  I have no idea how it connected to traffic reports or how the satellite worked.</p>
<p>There isn't an AUX plug, but it is interesting that it had a six CD player with a cassette deck.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4629968</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 13:12:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4629968</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4629968@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 17 2020 02:02:40 PM EST</span> <span>from LoanShark </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />zooer - don't let it install the latest version of SupportAssist OS Recovery tools - this is what bricked my machine last week </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Dell told me it has another BIOS update along with another SupportAssist update.</p>
<p>BIOS Info</p>
<h3 style="box-sizing: border-box; color: inherit; font-family: Roboto-Light; font-size: 20px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; line-height: 24px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Dell G5 5000 System BIOS</span></h3>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;">This package contains the Dell system BIOS update. BIOS is a firmware package that is embedded on a small memory chip on the system board. It controls the keyboard, monitor, disk drives, and other devices. This update addresses the Intel Technical Advisory INTEL-TA-00391 and Intel Security Advisories INTEL-SA-00358, INTEL-SA-00389. A security advisory is a statement when a security vulnerability impacts a product, and a remedy is available for the vulnerability.</p>
<p class="padt5 mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px; padding-top: 5px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Version</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> 1.1.0</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Category</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> BIOS</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Release Date</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> December 08, 2020</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Last Updated</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> NA</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Importance</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> Urgent</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">File Format</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> Update Package for Microsoft Windows</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">File Name</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> G5_5000_1.1.0.exe</p>
<p> </p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">File size</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> 11.53 MB</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"> </p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"> </p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"> </p>
<p> Support Assist info:</p>
<h3 style="box-sizing: border-box; color: inherit; font-family: Roboto-Light; font-size: 20px; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; line-height: 24px; margin: 0px 0px 10px;"><span class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools</span></h3>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;">SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools</p>
<p class="padt5 mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px; padding-top: 5px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Version</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> 5.3.0.13847</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Category</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> Application</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Release Date</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> 11/2/2020</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Last Updated</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> NA</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Importance</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> Urgent</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">File Format</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span> Update Package for Microsoft Windows</p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">File Name</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">:</span></p>
<p> </p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><strong class="ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box;">File size</strong><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">: 180.00MB</span></p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></span></p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;">Looking at the release date, I am assuming that I did not install it the last time it came up.</span></p>
<p class="mar0 ng-binding" style="box-sizing: border-box; font-family: Roboto-Light, Roboto-Regular; font-variant-numeric: normal; font-variant-east-asian: normal; margin: 0px;"><span class="i10npadleft en-US" style="box-sizing: border-box;"><br /></span></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4629960</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 12:51:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4629960</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4629960@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ironically have had better luck with "external' FM transmitter types, then built in. ( both aftermarket stereo and OEM ).  </p>
<p>But the FM ones get a lot of broadcast interference. ( more so now that here are NO un-used channels left in this area. ).  I have yet to try one that taps into the antenna, that should fix that.  But its a lot more trouble than I want to go thru just to be able to use my phone for music in the car.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4629557</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 05:02:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4629557</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4629557@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Well... built in BT in the GMCs works really well. But aftermarket adapters are just a nightmare. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4629472</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2020 00:21:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4629472</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4629472@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Oh, i also see the day its gone, just not yet :)</p>
<p>My latest has USB, that seems to do the job for me, for the most part. I have about given up on BT in the car. too unstable due to interference. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4629446</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 22:46:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4629446</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4629446@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Putting it in the back and running a special cable to it is the first step toward, "let's just cut this bit out in the next version." <br /><br />It is a matter of market demand. Aux-jack users are dwindling. <br /><br />Eventually, there will be *very* expensive units that have an aux-jack, for the hold outs who won't move forward. <br /><br /></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Dec 14 2020 07:19:48 EST</span> <span>from Nurb432 </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Ya, the port is in the back, but its still there was my meaning. Not 'gone'.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4628964</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2020 12:19:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4628964</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4628964@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ya, the port is in the back, but its still there was my meaning. Not 'gone'.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4628483</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 20:14:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4628483</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4628483@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>In the weekender I have a head unit that is a half-din Pioneer that has a full DIN screen that extends out and then flips up when you turn it on, and it has BT, USB... Android Auto, Apple Play... Pandora, Navigation and some other things built in... it'll play DVDs when you're stopped, or if you hack it, when you're driving. Voice command. It used to work great with Android Play for hands free music selection from my library without taking my eyes off the road with "OK Google..."  <br /><br />It wasn't cheap. The aux-in is there, but you have to run a cable from the back of the head unit around and mount it somewhere on the front - so most people just skip it. You did need the USB in order to get the full features of Android Auto. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Dec 13 2020 13:13:54 EST</span> <span>from Nurb432 </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I just bought 2 new stereos ( one for the jeep and one for the little car ) both had aux input. They were not 'high end', perhaps that is why?  ( but they did have BT, USB, and a Sirius jack )</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy; font-size: 12px; display: inline !important;"> </span></div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4628430</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:16:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4628430</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4628430@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Kids these days and their fancy cassettes playing that 'rock music'.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In my day </p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="https://d32c3oe4bky4k6.cloudfront.net/-/media/uscamediasite/images/story-images/2017/12/car-record-player(1).ashx?modified=20171218150237" alt="History of obsolete car audio, part 2: Record players | Hagerty Media" /></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>( ok, perhaps a bit older than me.. but i DO remember having an 8 track in my first car )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4628429</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 18:13:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4628429</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4628429@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I just bought 2 new stereos ( one for the jeep and one for the little car ) both had aux input. They were not 'high end', perhaps that is why?  ( but they did have BT, USB, and a Sirius jack )</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Dec 09 2020 14:52:02 EST</span> <span>from ParanoidDelusions </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>The aux jack. <br /><br />They're going the way of old video standards. They're basically a retro-connector at this point.  The aux-to-something modern adapters will increasingly be the way to get that done. They tend to be a hassle, because they need power. One more thing to forget to charge. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"> </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4628400</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 16:55:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4628400</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4628400@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>That is an awesome memory. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Dec 12 2020 19:09:24 EST</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;">driving around Reading in the middle of the night with some friends and playing my electric guitar connected through one of those adapters. </span></blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4628049</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2020 00:09:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4628049</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4628049@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >And here I was amazed at the "fake casette" that plugs into a tape  
 >deck and gives you an 3.5" audio plug. I love things that bridge the  
 >old and the new, allowing us to enjoy the best of both.  
  
 One of my favorite memories of the "fake cassette adapter" was driving around
Reading in the middle of the night with some friends and playing my electric
guitar connected through one of those adapters.  The sound was really shitty
and it gave a nice fuzzy, crunchy sound to the guitar. 
  
 (And in case it isn't obvious, I wasn't the one driving.  I play right handed
and we are in the United States so the guitar neck would have been out the
window.  I was in the back seat.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4625551</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 19:52:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4625551</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4625551@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The aux jack. <br /><br />They're going the way of old video standards. They're basically a retro-connector at this point.  The aux-to-something modern adapters will increasingly be the way to get that done. They tend to be a hassle, because they need power. One more thing to forget to charge. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Dec 09 2020 09:28:42 EST</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />What's increasingly rare? The aux jack on car stereos? I haven't found that to be the case. In any case, there are both aux-to-bluetooth and bluetooth-to-aux dongles readily available from the random electronic stuff supplier of your choice. <br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4625457</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 16:34:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4625457</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4625457@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>And here I was amazed at the "fake casette" that plugs into a tape deck and gives you an 3.5" audio plug. I love things that bridge the old and the new, allowing us to enjoy the best of both.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4625347</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2020 14:28:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4625347</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4625347@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >walkman, and will go right into your aux-in jack on your head unit -  
 >although those are increasingly rare.    
  
 What's increasingly rare?  The aux jack on car stereos?  I haven't found
that to be the case.  In any case, there are both aux-to-bluetooth and bluetooth-to-aux
dongles readily available from the random electronic stuff supplier of your
choice. 
  
 I know this isn't what any of you are looking for, but I have to mention
that we added bluetooth to my son's 2003 Camry using an aftermarket kit that
fools the head unit into thinking that the optional CD changer is present
and there is a disc in it.  If there is any such thing as an elegant hack,
this is it.  Just set the system to "CD" and as long as there isn't a CD in
the actual slot (he's 20, he doesn't own any CDs) it goes into bluetooth mode.
 Everything works, even the prev/next track selector works with the bluetooth
source if that's available.  It's really cool. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4623783</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2020 01:01:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4623783</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4623783@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The same little aux out jacks on MP3 players usually exist on a walkman, and will go right into your aux-in jack on your head unit - although those are increasingly rare. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Dec 07 2020 18:37:55 EST</span> <span>from zooer </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Can't wear headsets while driving.</p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4623755</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 23:37:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4623755</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4623755@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Can't wear headsets while driving.</p>
<p>I hate the idea of streaming, I converted all my CDs to MP3s, so I am sticking with that.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4623569</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 17:42:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4623569</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4623569@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Dec 07 2020 10:05:59 EST</span> <span>from zooer </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<p>My MP3 player allows me to play music without advertising or a screen.  I don't have to worry about data rates being applied.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p><img src="https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.extremetech.com%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2015%2F01%2Ftpsl2.png&amp;f=1&amp;nofb=1" alt="Can Sony recapture the magic of the original Walkman ..." /></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4623460</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 15:05:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4623460</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4623460@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Dec 07 2020 08:48:34 AM EST</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>It blocks all advertisements <strong>and</strong> it allows you to play videos with the screen off, which is what you normally want when listening to music while driving.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>My MP3 player allows me to play music without advertising or a screen.  I don't have to worry about data rates being applied.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4623405</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:54:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4623405</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4623405@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It is interesting that Google allows side loading which they know keeps folks like us more engaged but also results in Android being more prone to exploits and malware than Apple's walled garden. <br /><br />And there is a dichotomy in this. You're snubbing your nose at Google's crappy developer policies, but you're going off the rez and trusting whoever is coding YouTube Vanced to be more ethical than Google. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Dec 07 2020 08:48:34 EST</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Look for an app called "YouTube Vanced" (you can't get it in the Play Store, you have to sideload it).</p>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4623403</link><pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2020 13:48:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4623403</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4623403@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><br />They're doing the same kind of BS with Google Play Music moving to YouTube - which cripples Android Auto unless you're willing to pay for a YouTube premium music subscription - which I'm not. <br /><br /></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Look for an app called "YouTube Vanced" (you can't get it in the Play Store, you have to sideload it).</p>
<p>It blocks all advertisements <strong>and</strong> it allows you to play videos with the screen off, which is what you normally want when listening to music while driving.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4616430</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 15:27:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4616430</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4616430@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Its trivial to move off their platforms. Both FB and Google even offer a simple way to download all your data at once, before you delete your account. Donno about others, like twitter.</p>
<p>There are still plenty of other viable options for social media, mail, calendar, chat, video, etc. They dont really hold you hostage, you can pack your toys up and go home.</p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Nov 29 2020 09:50:22 EST</span> <span>from zooer </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Perhaps a bit of sarcasm, they DO have a monopoly on your data so they can start charging you..... anyway... whatta ya gonna do bout it?</p>
<p>The drug dealer always gives you the first hit free.  Great marketing plan, get you hooked first so you don't have a choice.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4616421</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 15:12:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4616421</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4616421@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Same thing I did with my drug dealers. Quit doing their shit. :) <br /><br />You can also actively screw with them. Facebook's algorithms are *easy* to game. Me and my friend had Facebook convinced that I was a married conservative man with a child who was in a serious gay relationship with my Nephew - so for the longest time they were sending me Gay Cruise ads as well as more typical ads. It was hilarious. <br /><br />Enough people throwing enough monkey wrenches into their machine may not break the machine - but it is fun to do, anyhow. :) <br /><br />The rising popularity of alternative private browsers, of VPNs, or alternate search engines, of alternate social media sites like this - all takes away their monopoly on our data. My friend calls it "side-nets"... not necessarily the dark web, but the back alleys of the Internet. The data they have a monopoly on is worthless if I keep most of my traffic out of the areas they can control. </p>
<p><br /><br /></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Nov 29 2020 09:50:22 EST</span> <span>from zooer </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Perhaps a bit of sarcasm, they DO have a monopoly on your data so they can start charging you..... anyway... whatta ya gonna do bout it?</p>
<p>The drug dealer always gives you the first hit free.  Great marketing plan, get you hooked first so you don't have a choice.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4616416</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 14:50:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4616416</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4616416@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Perhaps a bit of sarcasm, they DO have a monopoly on your data so they can start charging you..... anyway... whatta ya gonna do bout it?</p>
<p>The drug dealer always gives you the first hit free.  Great marketing plan, get you hooked first so you don't have a choice.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4616379</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 13:22:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4616379</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4616379@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Nov 29 2020 07:08:23 EST</span> <span>from zooer </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 28 2020 07:00:28 PM EST</span> <span>from ParanoidDelusions </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I'm big on the concept it is easy to lower your price if you charge too much, but it is impossible to go from "free" to "pay for play". <span style="background-color: transparent;"> </span></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Unless they have a monopoly or complete control over your data, then they can easily move from free to pay.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p>I think you inadvertently just made a defense that Google, Facebook and Twitter do not, in fact have a monopoly, though their reach may be troubling and huge. <br /><br />Because in all 3 cases,I have the ability to go, "eff 'em," if they start acting like idiots. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4616358</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 12:08:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4616358</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4616358@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 28 2020 07:00:28 PM EST</span> <span>from ParanoidDelusions </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I'm big on the concept it is easy to lower your price if you charge too much, but it is impossible to go from "free" to "pay for play". <span style="background-color: transparent;"> </span></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Unless they have a monopoly or complete control over your data, then they can easily move from free to pay.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4616145</link><pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2020 00:00:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4616145</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4616145@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I'm big on the concept it is easy to lower your price if you charge too much, but it is impossible to go from "free" to "pay for play". </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 28 2020 14:02:53 EST</span> <span>from Nurb432 </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I dont have a problem paying my way, but they need to cut out the ads if i do start paying. But the way they are doing this, annoys me. However, i dont want to be charged a business rate for a personal line. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 28 2020 13:54:53 EST</span> <span>from ParanoidDelusions </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I think they are trying to figure out how to get paid for things they've been giving away. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
<div class="message_content"> </div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4616011</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 19:02:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4616011</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4616011@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I dont have a problem paying my way, but they need to cut out the ads if i do start paying. But the way they are doing this, annoys me. However, i dont want to be charged a business rate for a personal line. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 28 2020 13:54:53 EST</span> <span>from ParanoidDelusions </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I think they are trying to figure out how to get paid for things they've been giving away. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"> </div>
<div class="message_content"> </div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4616005</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 18:54:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4616005</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4616005@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I think they are trying to figure out how to get paid for things they've been giving away. </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 28 2020 13:10:52 EST</span> <span>from Nurb432 </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I transferred my cell # to them some time ago. It was nice having both cell and VoIP options, transparent on the same #   Plus when i change service carriers, its trivial. just map to the new 'base' number and no one has to know it changed, and i dont have to move the number, yet again. Oh, and it also rings my home phone. and of course having SMS on my computer.  </p>
<p>Not saying hangouts was 'perfect' as it could be improved, but it worked and was all there in one place. </p>
<p>I suppose losing in-network chat isn't end of world, only 3 people i know use it. the rest were via sms. And i can live with 3 apps instead of one, its just damned annoying to be taking a step backwards. ( unless they plan on lifting that restriction when hangouts is turned off? )</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4615968</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 18:10:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4615968</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4615968@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I transferred my cell # to them some time ago. It was nice having both cell and VoIP options, transparent on the same #   Plus when i change service carriers, its trivial. just map to the new 'base' number and no one has to know it changed, and i dont have to move the number, yet again. Oh, and it also rings my home phone. and of course having SMS on my computer.  </p>
<p>Not saying hangouts was 'perfect' as it could be improved, but it worked and was all there in one place. </p>
<p>I suppose losing in-network chat isn't end of world, only 3 people i know use it. the rest were via sms. And i can live with 3 apps instead of one, its just damned annoying to be taking a step backwards. ( unless they plan on lifting that restriction when hangouts is turned off? )</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4615903</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 16:27:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4615903</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4615903@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Agreed. I haven't been using Hangouts a lot - but I use it, and have, for a long time. Have a phone number associated with it... I make calls with it, send texts with it. It is kind of like a burner number I can give to people I don't want to have my actually number. <br /><br />They're doing the same kind of BS with Google Play Music moving to YouTube - which cripples Android Auto unless you're willing to pay for a YouTube premium music subscription - which I'm not. <br /><br />The way I see it - they're just encouraging me to buy OUT of their ecosystem - which I've been very dedicated to for years. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Nov 28 2020 11:11:19 EST</span> <span>from Nurb432 </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Google is a confusing company in general. And im sort of miffed at them this fall...</p>
<p>...convergence is a good thing, this is going backwards.  All they had to do was improve each piece of hangouts .. not start from scratch and break it apart. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4615900</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2020 16:11:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4615900</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4615900@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Google is a confusing company in general. And im sort of miffed at them this fall. They decided to kill hangouts, an integrated platform for voice, video, txt etc.. an break it into 3 different products.   With one of them being crippled - chat for in-network messages, cant create new messages.. only 'if you are invited' ( or pay for a business account )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Now its chat for in-network texts</p>
<p>voice for regular calls and out of network texts  ( sms )</p>
<p>meet for video</p>
<p>not sure what will do VoIP to off network carriers . there are times i need this when i have zero signal in buildings but do have WiFi. We do have jabber as well for the office ( cisco's crap, not the 'standard' ) but i dont want to make personal calls over that. </p>
<p>and i guess duo ( which i never used ) is gone too. i donno,. its hard to keep up with these folks.</p>
<p>convergence is a good thing, this is going backwards.  All they had to do was improve each piece of hangouts .. not start from scratch and break it apart. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Rant over and back OT: i have been using Chinese android TV boxes for a long time now. With the proper setup, i do agree that they are easier to deal with than a PC based media center. Cheaper, smaller, etc. i didnt care much about chromecast, as i had local drive attached, BUT Netflix was getting harder and harder to make work on generic boxes ( bastards ) so i ended up buying a 'Netflix blessed' MIbox (<span style="color: #000000;"> from <span style="font-family: Roboto, arial, sans-serif; font-size: 14px;">Xiaomi</span>,</span> the same people who make my phones ) and it has chrome cast too ( yay? ).  Also have a couple of miracast dongles for when i needed to 'cast' from a PC to a overhead or something. They dont quire being on internet to function, unlike googles which simply wont work without internet. So, not hardly used the chromecast feature at all.  Other problem with chromecast is its 100% streaming. i like my local files.. Sure you can make it work, but at that work, why bother?</p>
<p>Had a older chromecast years ago just before i went to generic android boxes, and I ditched it due to the local file problem. Just wasn't worth the effort to 'make it work'. </p>
<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Nov 27 2020 18:21:11 EST</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">The new Chromecasts with "Google TV" -- which is not the product they used to call "Google TV", but instead a new version of the product they used to call "Android TV" (confused yet?) -- may actually be *exactly* that. I think they may have figured out that a smartphone OS runs on a television much more seamlessly than a PC OS does. <br /><br />Now if they'd only put that into a car, instead of pushing the sleazy hacks that are Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4615623</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2020 23:21:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4615623</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4615623@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The new Chromecasts with "Google TV" -- which is not the product they used
to call "Google TV", but instead a new version of the product they used to
call "Android TV" (confused yet?) -- may actually be *exactly* that.  I think
they may have figured out that a smartphone OS runs on a television much more
seamlessly than a PC OS does. 
  
 Now if they'd only put that into a car, instead of pushing the sleazy hacks
that are Android Auto and Apple CarPlay. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4613073</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2020 03:27:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4613073</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4613073@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Yeah, pretty much. A smart TV is smartphone tech with a really big panel
attached. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4612864</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 19:08:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4612864</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4612864@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Didn't it arrive with the popularity of telescreens... I mean smartphones?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4612851</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:57:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4612851</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4612851@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > On the other hand, at one point they sent me $8 because I ended up as 
 
 >a claimant in a class action lawsuit because the TV was spying on me.  

  
 1984 has truly arrived. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4611207</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2020 22:10:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4611207</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4611207@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Nov 22 2020 16:28:35 EST</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><span style="background-color: transparent; color: navy;">My TV does that. Sometimes I turn it on and have to wait for an update before I can watch cat videos on it. (What, did you think I'd watch the garbage on cable?) It's as annoying there as it is on a desktop computer. </span></blockquote>
<br />On the other hand, at one point they sent me $8 because I ended up as a claimant in a class action lawsuit because the TV was spying on me. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Yeah, I have a TV that occasionally fails to "boot," and just ends up hung on the big V logo. <br /><br />It is annoying. Honestly, turning on the Xbox One, generally speaking - the download patches take so long I never get to actually play any of the games. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4611156</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2020 21:28:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4611156</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4611156@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >updates on mobile devices are bad enough. Pretty soon you'll start  
 >you car and have to wait 30 minutes while a firmware update downloads  
 >and applies, and if anything goes wrong, your car will be bricked.    
  
 My TV does that.  Sometimes I turn it on and have to wait for an update before
I can watch cat videos on it.  (What, did you think I'd watch the garbage
on cable?)   It's as annoying there as it is on a desktop computer. 
  
 On the other hand, at one point they sent me $8 because I ended up as a claimant
in a class action lawsuit because the TV was spying on me. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4606230</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:56:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4606230</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4606230@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 my machine does have a linux partition dual boot, maybe that's what f**ked
it up. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4606229</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:56:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4606229</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4606229@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 yeah, that one errors out a lot. which is fine it it fails--it fails to brick
your machine. 
  
 don't try too hard to make that one go through, and keep canceling it for
a while. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4606219</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2020 00:14:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4606219</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4606219@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It was part of the update, and it was stuck on that part of the update.  I canceled it.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4606042</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 19:02:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4606042</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4606042@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 zooer - don't let it install the latest version of SupportAssist OS Recovery
tools - this is what bricked my machine last week 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4606017</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 18:37:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4606017</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4606017@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 17 2020 09:33:52 EST</span> <span>from zooer </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I received an "Updates available" notice this morning and the BIOS firmware can be updated to 1.0.5.  Apparently they found problems with 1.0.4.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p>Yup... this is something emerging in PC computing that eventually I'll dislike. I'm not a big fan of push OS updates. Push hardware updates on mobile devices are bad enough. Pretty soon you'll start you car and have to wait 30 minutes while a firmware update downloads and applies, and if anything goes wrong, your car will be bricked. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4605809</link><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2020 14:33:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4605809</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4605809@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I received an "Updates available" notice this morning and the BIOS firmware can be updated to 1.0.5.  Apparently they found problems with 1.0.4.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4604381</link><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2020 02:38:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4604381</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4604381@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > For my use case I've abandoned Virtualbox, I got tired of sluggish   
 >GUI.   
 >   
 >    
 >    
 > (IG and I have discussed that ad nauseum)   
  
 Yeesh.  Have we ever. 
  
 I think we agreed that all the currently available solutions are terrible,
even the ones which claim they can solve that problem. 
  
 Ironically, the solution that looks the most promising, albeit currently
in vaporware, is the accelerated stuff Microsoft is putting into WSL.  With
any luck they will be able to run accelerated Linux graphics in a WSL session.
 And now I won't be able to use it because my Linux desktop is currently doing
double-duty as a server again.  So help me, if I end up running Windows Server
because they get there first...   oy. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4600814</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 15:39:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4600814</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4600814@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2020-11-10 21:56 from zooer   
 >With firmware 1.0.3 the boot menu listed two USB ports, the network  
 >cards and the C drive.  Firmware 1.0.4 didn't list a USB port unless  
 >a stick was plugged into the port.  
  
 I wonder if they defaulted CSM to off, or something, with that release. UEFI
doesn't list physical devices in the boot order menu, it lists the .EFI boot
executables it can find on those physical devices (which might be more than
one if you have a dual-boot setup.) If CSM and Legacy oprom boot modes are
enabled, then it *also* displays the physical devices (in which case if that's
selected, it looks for a classic boot sector.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4600122</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:22:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4600122</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4600122@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Glad the discussion helped you work through it - even if you found your own solution. These kind of changes are aggravating, to say the least. <br /><br /></p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 10 2020 19:13:23 EST</span> <span>from zooer </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I found out that in version 1.0.4 of the BIOS firmware the USB stick must be inserted before powering the machine for the BIOS to allow you the option of swapping the boot order. This is new to me, I thought you could set the boot order to a default setting, if the device wasn't present it went to the next device.</p>
<p>I found a blurb that said you have to use the F12 key to get to boot options as opposed to F2 and setting the boot options in BIOS.  </p>
<p>The internal drives still do not show up, but at least I can move forward from here.  (C drive is SSD, D drive is a spinny drive)</p>
<p>Thank you for your comments and suggestions.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4600117</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 02:56:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4600117</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4600117@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>With firmware 1.0.3 the boot menu listed two USB ports, the network cards and the C drive.  Firmware 1.0.4 didn't list a USB port unless a stick was plugged into the port.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4600051</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2020 00:13:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4600051</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4600051@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I found out that in version 1.0.4 of the BIOS firmware the USB stick must be inserted before powering the machine for the BIOS to allow you the option of swapping the boot order. This is new to me, I thought you could set the boot order to a default setting, if the device wasn't present it went to the next device.</p>
<p>I found a blurb that said you have to use the F12 key to get to boot options as opposed to F2 and setting the boot options in BIOS.  </p>
<p>The internal drives still do not show up, but at least I can move forward from here.  (C drive is SSD, D drive is a spinny drive)</p>
<p>Thank you for your comments and suggestions.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4600041</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:36:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4600041</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4600041@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The thing about VirtualBox for me... <br /><br />Is it is free, easily available, and most walkthru docs are designed with it in mind. <br /><br />If I were in the enterprise, I wouldn't use it. Citrix or VMWare. <br /><br />But it is a matter of running a Mac Mojave system on one core of a dual core i7 on my Surface Pro 5. I can only give it 1 core, 8gb of the 16GB of memory, and a small slice of the 512mb SSD. <br /><br />I don't think any other VM would markedly improve performance. If I ran it on my water cooled gaming desktop, it would probably be far more zippy. It is something that is at the back of my mind to set up at some point. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4600035</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:13:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4600035</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4600035@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >abstraction layer between the VM and the actual hardware. That may be  
 
 >a moot point at some point, but it is still a TRUE point.     
    
 For my use case I've abandoned Virtualbox, I got tired of sluggish GUI. 
 
  
  
 (IG and I have discussed that ad nauseum) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4600034</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:07:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4600034</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4600034@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Laptops in particular. It's become a bit of a black art; several of the Linux
bugs I've experienced on this laptop have been in some way [ower -management
related. 
  
 Modern desktops don't have quite the same PM features. Or security features,
these days, as the motherboards are often just targeted for gamers. You typically
don't get hard disk encryption enabled by default in Windows Home on a desktop,
because the Device Encryption stuff requires a BIOS that conforms to a particularly
tight specification. 
  
 These days, you don't buy a "laptop", you buy a "device" that the manufacturer
has tightly customized and integrated for Windows. But a desktop is still
more of an open commodity. 
  
 I'd almost prefer that desktops get some of the advanced security features
that are finding their way into laptops, like encryption... but then again,
not really - what's stopping me from enabling
encryption is that I don't want to deal with what happens if I lose the key.
Anyway, to do that on the typical desktop requires a Pro edition of 'doze.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599923</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:50:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599923</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599923@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>All the way back to Microsoft Hibernate/Sleep - suspend/resume states in computing have always been janky - no matter where you're doing it. <br /><br />It is also how I feel about virtualization. Things may have gotten so good enough that it isn't apparent - but anything that runs GOOD or GREAT on a VM will actually run BETTER on bare metal, with no abstraction layer between the VM and the actual hardware. That may be a moot point at some point, but it is still a TRUE point. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599912</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 19:45:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599912</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599912@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not sure what TDP-Down is - but yeah, performance wise, there is a lot of robbing Peter to pay Paul in reducing thermal load on very compact Intel based machines. <br /><br />I think Apple has traditionally been very aggressive about finding novel ways to maximize battery life, minimize heat generation, and put the system into low power consumption when it isn't necessary. It is basically like Chevy ecoboost engine that drops down to 4 cyl when 8 cylinders aren't necessary. They're throttling processors, shutting down systems like WiFi and Bluetooth and waking them only when there is traffic... putting things into deeper sleep... PCs used to be just a "system on/system off" proposition. Which meant a machine at idle was still consuming a lot of juice just to sit there and do nothing. <br /><br />The problem is that Apple's approach causes a lot of weird issues. WiFi seeing every router for 10 miles around - but having terrible throughput to the modern Mesh network in your house unless you're right on to
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 10 2020 13:49:18 EST</span> <span>from LoanShark </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />configurable TDP-down reduces the CPU power consumption on this i7 Dell to 9W from 15W. There was a Linux bug for a while that erroneously put it into 9W mode. A lot less heat there, but it really really neuters the performance of the machine in a major way. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599881</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:49:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599881</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599881@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 configurable TDP-down reduces the CPU power consumption on this i7 Dell to
9W from 15W. There was a Linux bug for a while that erroneously put it into
9W mode. A lot less heat there, but it really really neuters the performance
of the machine in a major way. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599869</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:44:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599869</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599869@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 10 2020 13:18:53 EST</span> <span>from LoanShark </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />I started my current job around Nov 2018. They issued me a Thinkpad X1 Carbon which was new at the time. It didn't last long. Battery had to be replaced in a matter of months, and then it developed intermittent problems charging. I've since moved on to the Dell, and the X1 might have been reissued to another employee who might or might not be having better luck with it. <br /><br />I've heard that some of Lenovo's heavier designs (T or P series? I'm not sure which) are built to be a little more durable. <br /><br />Funny you should mention the heatsinks. I use the Dell either on my lap, or a cloth-covered ottoman, lately, and apparently it got pretty hot at least once, because the rubber feet on the bottom have melted and deformed and mostly fallen off. This deal is slimmer even than the unibody MBP's I used to use. It's so ridiculously thin that there's no room for any USB-A ports, it just has two USB-C which require adapters to do anything useful besides power delivery. </d
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I've had a number of Surface Pros, a SP3, 4 and 5. <br /><br />The SP3 had to be swapped out, under warranty, when the WiFi stopped working. The SP4, the battery started swelling, which is how I ended up with the SP5. <br /><br />I wouldn't buy another one. Cramming an i7 into a sealed tablet sized form factor is a bad idea. Nobody who is stealing Apple's ideas for making laptops thinner is doing any BETTER than Apple at making that design aesthetic *smarter*. <br /><br />If your machine can't be opened up easily - it is made to be disposable on the *manufacturer's* timescale of when a system should be retired, not yours. <br /><br />And an i7 really needs to be used on a hard flat surface...<br /><br />Mac started this craze, though - with the Airbooks. Intel architecture isn't designed to be used in such small form factors. Intel has been fighting that battle for a decade now - and they're not good at low power solutions. They're a "no replacement for displacement," design that really thrives with l
<p><br /><br /><br /></p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599845</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 18:18:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599845</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599845@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I started my current job around Nov 2018. They issued me a Thinkpad X1 Carbon
which was new at the time. It didn't last long. Battery had to be replaced
in a matter of months, and then it developed intermittent problems charging.
I've since moved on to the Dell, and the X1 might have been reissued to another
employee who might or might not be having better luck with it. 
  
 I've heard that some of Lenovo's heavier designs (T or P series? I'm not
sure which) are built to be a little more durable. 
  
 Funny you should mention the heatsinks. I use the Dell either on my lap,
or a cloth-covered ottoman, lately, and apparently it got pretty hot at least
once, because the rubber feet on the bottom have melted and deformed and mostly
fallen off. This deal is slimmer even than the unibody MBP's I used to use.
It's so ridiculously thin that there's no room for any USB-A ports, it just
has two USB-C which require adapters to do anything useful besides power delivery.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599824</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:47:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599824</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599824@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>It is a beautiful design, though - I love the way it *looks*. Very German luxury. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599823</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:46:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599823</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599823@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>An example, is that the CPU and GPU are on the bottom of the logic board - which means you have to disassemble the whole thing, including removing all cables from the logic board, to reapply thermal grease on GPU and CPU. <br /><br />This design choice was made to make the MBP Unibody so thin - but I also think that it was done to put the heatsinks in contact with the aluminum body, thereby using the case itself to spread and dissipate heat. <br /><br />Which is why Macs became notorious for getting so hot that they could actually cause burns if you, you know, used your laptop on your lap. <br /><br />So they came out with laptop coolers that plug into your usb and raise the laptop off of your lap while also providing extra cooling onto the laptop itself. <br /><br />That look like THIS: <br /><br /><img src="https://external-content.duckduckgo.com/iu/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bestconsumerelectronics.co.uk%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2F2017%2F05%2Ftargus-AWE55EU-laptop-cooling-stand-review.jpg&amp;f=1&amp;nofb=
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599798</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:18:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599798</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599798@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So, getting a bit more technical - when I got this Mac, the guy was saying it only powered up if you held the power button down for 10 seconds then attached the charger. He was moving and said he didn't have time to figure this one out. He didn't have a charger, it was covered in gaudy stickers, I offered him $80 instead of $100. It is a MBP 2011 i7 15" with Radeon - and they're notorious for burning out their GPU. <br /><br />Got it home, found a charger on Amazon for $15, ordered it, plugged it in. 4gb of memory and a 500 gb magnetic drive. It booted, into an ASUS Windows (7 or 8) partition. He had told me it worked fine with Linux or Windows. <br /><br />Booted into Mac Internet Recovery - and the only option was to install Lion. Tried that, and it went through the initial setup, then reported, "Cannot install the required components." Search said this is a common issue. A number of things were suggested. Most likely was "create install media on USB and set date to a date around when target version o
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 10 2020 11:11:59 EST</span> <span>from LoanShark </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />That's weird. I haven't had those kinds of problems with the two MBP's I had for my previous job. Hardware eventually got flaky on the first one, but Windows laptops are big offenders in that area too. <br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599765</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:48:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599765</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599765@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > As usual, the automated "Startup Repair" does not work. For cases like
 
 >this, you have to run bcdboot from the command line option.   
  
 This is never preferred because it doesn't set up WinRE. But it'll do in
a pinch. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599764</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:46:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599764</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599764@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 successfully restored my Windows boot. For unknown reasons, booting the install
media Just Worked on the second try; maybe because I had installed an ubuntu
bootloader in the interim and that made it recognize the EFI partition? That
should not have been required. 
  
 As usual, the automated "Startup Repair" does not work. For cases like this,
you have to run bcdboot from the command line option. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599756</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:20:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599756</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599756@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >with important details. (Avoid Samsung Data Migration tool, it just   
 >doesn't work.)   
  
 EaseUS finally worked for me for this use case, but it's made in China. Other
options like Paragon are made in Russia. And Microsoft's own System Image
Recovery is not robust enough to deal with all possible hardware migration
scenarios. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599740</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:18:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599740</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599740@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >I don't understand all this new BIOS and partition stuff - but I  
 >muddle my way through it. I know that it is supposed to make things  
  
 Same. It took me several tries to get Windows partitions transferred the
last two times I upgraded the main storage device. This is all quite a bit
more complex than MBR-style boot ever was, and there's too much time lost
messing around with windows command-line programs `bcdedit` or `bcdboot` and
buggy partition migrators that fail to deal with important details. (Avoid
Samsung Data Migration tool, it just doesn't work.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599734</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 16:11:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599734</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599734@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 That's weird. I haven't had those kinds of problems with the two MBP's I
had for my previous job. Hardware eventually got flaky on the first one, but
Windows laptops are big offenders in that area too. 
  
 In any case, I had a bit of a disaster on the Dell laptop, which I am currently
typing from, today. I usually run Linux on it, but it's a dual boot Windows
setup. So I noticed that there was a BIOS update available with several security
fixes. Ok, great. Boot into Windows. Let Dell Update do its thing, it installs
about 9 software updates, but fails on the BIOS because I have an admin password
set. OK, great. That's expected, I've dealt with it before. Download the manual
BIOS installer from Dell's support website, it asks for the BIOS password.
Everything flashes great. 
  
 He's where the trouble starts. Eager to install all the updates, I double
checked Dell Update, and it still
wants to install SupportAssist OS Recovery Tools. That fails. Hmm. Go over
to the SupportAssist app, which also has an updater, and do it that way. That
eventually "succeeds." 
  
 But it completely wiped my EFI boot partition! Just deleted every file in
there, all the Ubuntu boot loader and the Windows boot loader as well. So
at that point, the machine was stuck on a firmware-based screen that wants
to download a recovery package from Dell, but requires a hardwired Ethernet
connection to do so, this ultrabook doesn't even have an Ethernet port; I
would have to go shopping for a USB adapter that is compatible with this BIOS(?)

  
 So, back into the BIOS. I happen to have both Ubuntu and Windows install
media kicking around from some work I was doing on my ASUS desktop just a
couple days ago, upgrading the boot drive to NVMe. In order to boot from USB
(zooer take note), I did have to check
a box labelled something like "Enable USB Boot", surprisingly enough. The
windows install USB boots but fails to get anywhere, so I can't recover my
Windows bootloader quite yet until I figure out what's going on. The ubuntu
install media worked fine and I was able to follow a Debian wiki page describing
how to reinstall grub. So, I have recovered the Linux side of the system,
but Windows eludes me for the moment. 
  
 *** Back on topic: 
  
 In a UEFI system, CSM (Compatibility Support Module) must be enabled in order
to boot from a legacy boot-sector media (non-UEFI mode.) The plan in the industry
is to phase out CSM because it weakens the security model of the system and
can theoretically make it easier to build firmware rootkits or subvert Secure
Boot. Also in line with the general trend to remove Legacy Stuff. It may already
have been removed from the newest laptops, my desktop still
has CSM but in order to boot from SYSLINUX media, CSM has to be enabled and
there are a few things that need to be set correctly under the Legacy USB
section. If it sounds like it's a compatibility thing, turn it on. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599638</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 14:38:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599638</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599638@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Nov 10 2020 08:59:53 EST</span> <span>from LoanShark </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>In the BIOS there was an option to navigate to a firmware file on the <br />USB but not to boot from the USB directly. </blockquote>
<br />Isn't it just the boot order menu, though? A connected USB, if the machine sees a UEFI image on it, is a bootable disk just like any other. <br /><br />If your PC is brand new, they are phasing out CSM, so it will only be able to boot your image if it's formatted GPT with UEFI executable. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>In general won't most PCs allow you to disable requiring GPT and UEFI to boot from a traditional boot drive, anyhow? <br /><br />I don't understand all this new BIOS and partition stuff - but I muddle my way through it. I know that it is supposed to make things more secure for us as end users, but it seems to make it easier for the manufacturers to limit what we can do, and Apple seems to love this kind of stuff - and this MBP I'm on would boot Windows and Linux great, but wouldn't boot OS X at all, until I did a bunch of magic rituals including holding multiple buttons harder than a bar chord down while hitting the power button at just the right time. Now it works. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599602</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 13:59:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599602</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599602@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >In the BIOS there was an option to navigate to a firmware file on the  
 >USB but not to boot from the USB directly.   
  
 Isn't it just the boot order menu, though? A connected USB, if the machine
sees a UEFI image on it, is a bootable disk just like any other. 
  
 If your PC is brand new, they are phasing out CSM, so it will only be able
to boot your image if it's formatted GPT with UEFI executable. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599601</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 13:58:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599601</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599601@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2020-11-09 21:25 from ParanoidDelusions   
 >Have you tried calling Dell technical support?   
 >  
  
 Yes. They can be quite helpful. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599460</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 11:39:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599460</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599460@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>In the BIOS there was an option to navigate to a firmware file on the USB but not to boot from the USB directly.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have not called technical support.  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599060</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:25:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599060</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599060@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Have you tried calling Dell technical support? </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599051</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 02:14:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599051</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599051@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 What I'm trying to say here is that the BIOS should always have the capability
to boot from USB, though that may have to be enabled in some way. Everything
else you're saying is beyond my experience; as far as I know, "that shouldn't
happen", but it did. [cue twilight zone music.] 
  
 Sounds like it's new so you can probably call dell support (LOL) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599023</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 01:02:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599023</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599023@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I used the default bootable USB creator that comes with Ubuntu to create the USB stick.  I still have my Linux box.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4599022</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:56:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4599022</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4599022@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I downloaded the previous version of the BIOS, version 1.0.3.  The machine performed the downgrade when it booted. </p>
<p>The first time I did it, I hit F12 at reboot, there was no USB option and no option in the BIOS configuration to turn it on.</p>
<p>When it rebooted it reinstalled the 1.0.4 BIOS.</p>
<p>I tried it a second time and let it start into windows without pressing any keys.  I was wondering if it had to "clean up" any files after the downgrade.</p>
<p>When it finished booting a desktop notification appeared in the notification box saying that BIOS version 1.0.4 will be installed on the next restart.  It did not ask if I wanted this, the notification appeared on its own without confirmation.</p>
<p>When I rebooted it reinstalled version 1.0.4.  </p>
<p>The USB option does not appear, it is the Windows bootloader or the NIC, those are my only two choices.  I was able to get the USB option at one time.  </p>
<p>I tried following this </p>
<p>https://www.dell.com/support/article/en-us/sln301754/how-to-install-ubuntu-and-windows-8-or-10-as-a-dual-boot-on-your-dell-pc?lang=en</p>
<p>My BIOS screens are different from the screens shown on this page, but close enough for me to find where to activate the USB option.</p>
<p>The 1.0.4 options are different from the 1.0.3 options.  Perhaps I need to install 1.0.1 of the BIOS but I am sure it will automatically install 1.0.4</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4598996</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:20:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4598996</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4598996@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 From the Dell Update/Service apps or from Windows Update? I'm typing this
from a Dell laptop right now, but never had it do BIOS updates unless I knew
about it. It's such a dangerous procedure that can brick the machine if power
fails, so it shouldn't be automated without a lot f warnings and disclaimers.

  
 In any case, to boot from USB you may also need to enable a USB Legacy option.
I've been dealing with that a lot this week on my ASUS desktop. 
  
 If it's a legacy-free design, you will need to use RUFUS to write a Ubuntu
USB stick with GPT partition table that can boot in UEFI-only (no CSM) mode.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4598987</link><pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:03:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4598987</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4598987@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The BIOS update was in with the other updates.  I didn't notice the update with the list of updates. I haven't used Windows in a long time.</p>
<p>That being said, I think I can downgrade to the older version and try again.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have no idea what the problem was when I tried to install Linux. </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4598952</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 22:53:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4598952</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4598952@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>A system will not usually update the BIOS without the user initiating a BIOS flash directly - unless it is a Mac. <br /><br />I mean, like, in 30+ years of IT experience, I've never had a BIOS update to a PC *pushed* to me. <br /><br />And most of my work was in Power Edge based datacenters. <br /><br />And when Linux won't install on an Intel PC - it is almost always bad RAM, in my experience. Windows seems to care less... of course, this may be why Windows tends to crash more often. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4598916</link><pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 21:20:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4598916</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4598916@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I purchased a new Dell, I had a few issues in the BIOS trying to get the boot from USB option on the boot order menu but was able to get it to do so.</p>
<p>I tried installing Ubuntu, and it seemed to freeze on the screen where the installation to which drive option came up.  It were not any drives listed or locations listed.  I couldn't click backwards or continue. I waited a few minutes, the computer didn't seem to respond.  As I hit the power button, I see an error pop up on the screen but I had no idea what it said.  I rebooted into Windows.  I was going to work on it in the morning.</p>
<p>The next morning the computer had updated the BIOS and I could no longer find a boot from USB option.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4593646</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2020 19:13:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4593646</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4593646@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >My son has a tenkeyless....  I can barely type on it for some   
 >reason.....   
  
 After a couple of weeks with one, I think I know why. 
  
 I had some trouble landing keystrokes on it for the first day or two.  I
took a good look at what I was doing on both full size and tenkeyless boards,
and I discovered that I was using muscle memory to measure the distance from
the right side of the keyboard to where my right hand needed to be to hit
the correct keys. 
  
 It took a couple of days to adjust, but it wasn't difficult.  I'm back to
my original typing speed, and my right arm is actually more comfortable because
my trackball now sits where the number keys used to be. 
  
 What I find amusing is that tenkeyless keyboards still have a Num Lock LED
even though there is no Num Lock key.  There is no number pad, no "Fn" key
to repurpose other keys as number keys like on a laptop, no purpose
at all for it to be there.  But it is there, and presumably it will illuminate
if the host tells it to. 
  
 Oh, and there's still a PrtSc key, which is nice because after way too long,
most operating systems finally do the right thing when you press it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4587718</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 23:25:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4587718</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4587718@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The keyboard I ordered to become my new daily driver is the "Ducky One 2 Horizon TKL".  For those of you viewing this in a web browser, a photo is shown here:</p>
<p><img src="
<p>I ordered it through the Great Satan of Seattle so I can return it if it isn't right for me ... using a credit I had with them from the last thing I ordered and didn't like.</p>
<p>If you're wondering about the color scheme, the blue keys remind me of old Data General equipment.  That has a bit of nostalgia for me, and nostalgia makes us do weird things.</p>
<p>I went with a tenkeyless because I almost never touch the numeric keypad on my keyboard, so hopefully I can save some desk space.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4587705</link><pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2020 21:59:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4587705</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4587705@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[My son has a tenkeyless....  I can barely type on it for some reason.....

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4586911</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2020 19:13:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4586911</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4586911@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[After a bit more testing I am now thinking that perhaps the problem wasn't
in the keyswitch itself.  It might be a hairline crack in the circuit board,
or some other non-switch failure.  I will miss this keyboard but it's still
usable, so I'm going to move it to a NUC I have set up in the garage. 
  
 For now, my main rig has a mushy old rubber dome keyboard attached to it.
 I suppose I could haul out one of my old Model M keyboards and find a way
to make it work, but they are absolutely filthy.  If I buy another mechanical
keyboard, I think it will be a tenkeyless layout this time, because I never
use the number pad and I'd rather have the desk space back. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4586335</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2020 22:24:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4586335</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4586335@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 WTF? 
  
 I replaced the keyswitch for the Enter key on my Das Keyboard 4, which has
Cherry MX Blue keyswitches.  Sometimes the keypress would not register, other
times the keypress would register multiple times.   This was a few months
ago. 
  
 Now it's happening again?!   The exact same problem.   I'm having a hard
time believing that another keyswitch failed in the exact same way, just a
short time later.   I want to blame it on software, but the problem happens
on two different computers. 
  
 I like this keyboard and I don't want to replace it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4585661</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:49:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4585661</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4585661@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Today, no.  The reason I brought it up is because both ARM and RISC-V are
fabless publishers of ISAs (and reference designs?) rather than manufacturers
of finished parts.  If manufacturers feel that ARM is no longer neutral enough
for them, RISC-V could be a consideration. 
  
 Admittedly, this is not likely to happen, unless Nvidia gets really stupid
with the licensing fees. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4584749</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:34:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4584749</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4584749@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 https://riscv.org/exchange/cores-socs/ 
  
 *wonders if any of those can really compete with ARM on performance. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4584748</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2020 13:31:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4584748</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4584748@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2020-09-14 11:50 from IGnatius T Foobar   
 >That was part of ARM's value proposition.  Apple's move to ARM looks a 
 
 >bit less cool today.  I wonder if this will breathe new life into   
 >RISC-V.   
  
 Does RISC-V even matter? IP is more about the hardware implementation than
about the ISA, right? Doesn't the AMD vs Intel fight give us a clear precedent
that you can't really defend the IP on the ISA itself? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4584361</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:57:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4584361</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4584361@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2020-09-14 11:50 from IGnatius T Foobar   
 >That was part of ARM's value proposition.  Apple's move to ARM looks a 
 
 >bit less cool today.  I wonder if this will breathe new life into   
 >RISC-V.   
 >   
 >  
  
 I wonder if they'll slow down their transition.  Maybe just make some ARM-based
laptops.....  See where things go. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4584360</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:50:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4584360</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4584360@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[That was part of ARM's value proposition.  Apple's move to ARM looks a bit
less cool today.  I wonder if this will breathe new life into RISC-V. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4584357</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2020 15:22:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4584357</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4584357@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 https://www.anandtech.com/show/16080/nvidia-to-acquire-arm-for-40-billion

  
 It.s Official: NVIDIA To Acquire Arm For $40 Billion 
  
 Can't say I'm happy about this; ARM looked a lot better when it was not owned
by a dominant chipmaker, the IP has always been available to all on non-discriminatory
terms. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4579926</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2020 00:56:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4579926</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4579926@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[      
 Gamer desktops are one thing, but that's almost enough to call into question
the datacenter suitability of this stuff, although it's still surely the best
choice for heavy-duty workloads, a lot of stuff is bursty and runs closer
to idle a lot.     
    
    
 And forget laptops. Wow.   
  
  
 This isn't being talked about much in the press, but some of the reviews
I'm looking at seem to bear this out; they measure consumption at the wall
and it might be 10-20W higher than some of the Intel stuff at idle. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4579922</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2020 00:41:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4579922</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4579922@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 hmm... idle power consumption on this chip (according to PPT, via HWINFO)
is around 15W 
  
 That's HIGH. On Haswell, it was measured in milliwatts. 
  
 Might have something to do with the multi-chip module design. Perhaps there's
a reason you're not seeing this stuff in laptops yet. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4578975</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 21:11:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4578975</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4578975@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 If one were to just raise the PPT in overclocking config and install liquid
cooling, this chip might be a bit of a monster; but the payoff to 105W suggests
that the payoff to 210W might be just another 2.5% ; 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4578974</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 21:08:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4578974</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4578974@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Yeah. I also noticed that having "C-States" turned on helps performance here;
regardless of whether you're set for 65W or 105W mode, the CPU runs ~20% idle
because of dependencies in the workload, yet it is throttled by the Package
Power Target during all the more-parallelizable portions of the run. So it's
a bit faster with C-States on, so that the idle cores do not contribute to
the package power target when they're idle. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4578972</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2020 20:50:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4578972</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4578972@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Wowzers!  It's totally not worth it to run at the higher speed.  I'll bet
the 2.5% difference becomes even smaller if the machine is doing a lot of
different things rather than a single parallelizable job. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4578784</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2020 22:44:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4578784</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4578784@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 so results. linux trunk snapshot from yesterday, identical clean builds on
ram disk. AMD 3900X maxes around 80% utilization with SMT enabled. make -j24.

  
 10m34.743s 65W mode 
 10m18.668s 105W mode 
  
 difference - 2.5% for significantly greater power consumption 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4578782</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2020 22:15:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4578782</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4578782@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 wow, nope. it's not remotely I/O bound. It's IPC bound. 
  
  
 Ran a whole kernel compile entirely out of a RAM disk (/dev/shm), and zero
change in performance. The reason it fails to utilize more than about 80%
CPU must be just bottlenecking on the master `make` process whose job is to
spawn parallel children. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4578693</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2020 09:27:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4578693</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4578693@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 on closer examination the kernel compile appears i/o bound on this system
now. explains the lack of difference between CPU settings.   
    
 I am running an older, SATA SSD.   
    
 you would think that you could get better IO throughput by using more concurrent
jobs, but no. there's an optimum value between 18-24 jobs, which succeed in
getting to 75% cpu utilization, and at anything more than that, CPU drops
back down to around 50%...   
    
 it's all disk writes for compiler output, reads fit in cache.   
  
  
 journal_async_commit, maybe? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4578594</link><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2020 22:42:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4578594</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4578594@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 they might be binned a little bit differently, but they're the same part
with a different TDP and PPT target (which happens to match the ECO mode on
the 3900x)   
    
 actually they probably are binned a little differently because the review
of the 3900x running in Eco mode shows it boosting a little higher than the
3900.   
  
  
 The base clock on the OEM, 65W part is only 3.1ghz and that's probably very
conservative, I was able to hit a lot higher than that even in an almost fully
all-core workload (kernel compile with -j24) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4578392</link><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 22:08:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4578392</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4578392@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[That sounds plausible, but are we sure that they are actually different parts?
 Or are they using the old trick of downrating the ones that come off the
line and don't pass QA at higher speeds? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4578164</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2020 21:43:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4578164</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4578164@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 Tested Eco Mode on the 3900x and it does seem to produce only a small performance
loss in the kernel compile, on the order of about 20 seconds over a 10 minute
compile, so, <5%. I don't have any devices to measure actual power consumption
at the wall, so I assume this test case jibes with the big reduction in Cinebench
that the geek sites are publishing. So, no reason not to crank that sucker
down if you just want to run it closer to the sweet spot of the exponential
power curve.   
  
  
 Glad I didn't buy one of the 65W models because Eco mode on the 105W-ers
is 65W; I am basically running it at he 3900 OEM-part spec, and these limits
may be better for long-term reliability of the silicon, no? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4577941</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 23:00:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4577941</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4577941@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Solved the Windows BSOD. There is a BIOS setting that impacts on it: 
  
 https://www.reddit.com/r/Amd/comments/hm23sd/does_anyone_else_get_a_blue_screen_at_boot_when/

  
 This all became clear when I installed Debugging Tools for Windows and analyzed
the crash dump, googled it and found that smarter-people-than-me had already
worked through it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4577940</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2020 22:57:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4577940</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4577940@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2020-08-11 13:45 from Ragnar Danneskjold     
 >How often are you compiling kernels that this makes a difference in    

 >your world?    
 > (Genuinely curious.....)     
 >     
 >    
    
 Occasionally, for bug reporting and debugging purposes. I also have an Ice
Lake laptop that has some annoying kernel problems that need to be sorted
out, so lately I've been doing the occasional build from the "drm-tip" branch
to test the current development codebase and coordinate with the upstream
devs on troubleshooting.   
    
 I don't really need 12 cores, but they were reasonably priced and they run
cool.   
  
  
 Creeping obsolescence of my old system was the main reason for the upgrade.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4577662</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:45:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4577662</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4577662@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[How often are you compiling kernels that this makes a difference in your world?
 (Genuinely curious.....) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4577659</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 17:40:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4577659</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4577659@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Welcome to the club.  :)    I love the new AMDs. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4577500</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2020 02:22:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4577500</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4577500@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Finishing building my AMD box. 
  
 Used brute force and ignorance with a motherboard standoff, and it's put
together OK, but it's not going to be easy to get this motherboard out without
an act of violence. I used the wrong type of screw for one particular standoff
(which was not originally supplied with the case), and it's stuck now. 
  
 Anyway, the system works great. But, crashes on boot if you try to enable
Windows' Memory Integrity feature in the Windows Security dialog. And that
feature was one of my major reasons for the upgrade, because it's virtualization-based
security and performs better on a modern processor with MBEC. 
  
 But. This thing compiles kernels 3X as fast, so I can't complain too much.
It's very rare to see that kind of improvement even in 10 years time. But
we just did, with this new generation of 8-12 core processors. 
  
 10 minute kernel compile instead of 30. 
  
 It's a 3900X. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4577123</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2020 07:13:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4577123</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4577123@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I don't know, I was waiting for desktop Ice Lake to come out to get Intel
a chance, but I finally pulled the trigger on an AMD build. This multicore
monster will make quick work kernel compiles. 
  
 The deciding factor was not so much that I need multicore performance, but
the creeping obsolescence of my Haswell rig. Anything older than Kaby Lake/Coffee
Lake has got issues with security or performace or both. I have been enabling
Memory Integrity on Windows on this box recently, and I learned that it can
take a big performance hit because that runs HyperV and the processor lacks
Mode Based Execution Control... so it will run real-mode code in emulation.

  
 I've got all the parts I need for this build sitting here... except for a
few screws and motherboard standoffs. Ordered those a day or two late when
I remembered that they had gone missing. I'm going from MicroATX to ATX, so
I need 3 more. Damn you, 2020 shipping delays. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4573595</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2020 14:41:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4573595</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4573595@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Is the decline of Intel continuing? 
  
 It's well known by now that their rollout of 10nm technology was delayed
by years as they went down some design dead ends, and their 7nm process was
going to be what turned it around.  But now the 7nm chips are delayed by a
year, possibly two, and word on the street is that they may have to use third-party
foundries to get anything to market at all. 
  
 Some of those foundries are already tooling up for 5nm, and already taking
bookings from Apple, AMD, and other fabless clients. 
  
 The next couple of years are going to be interesting.  Between Intel's missteps,
AMD's current successes, and Apple's switch to ARM, we could be looking at
quite a shuffle. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4569877</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 20:18:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4569877</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4569877@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Splat. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4569785</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 14:34:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4569785</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4569785@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Yeesssss. She earned it!!!   
  
 And while Lisa Su is flying high, MSI CEO Charles Chiang decided to take
a flight in the opposite direction, after taking a plummet from the seventh
floor of their building in Taiwan.  Their PR people said he "passed away due
to personal health factors." 
  
 I guess you can say that each in their own way, Su and Chiang both had an
impact. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4569478</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:34:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4569478</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4569478@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm running a 43" 4k monitor.  Never could get the hang of a multi-monitor
setup. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4567818</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 12:42:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4567818</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4567818@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 The typical 32" 4K display probably requires higher DPI font settings than
your ultrawide, for effectively less screen real estate. If I buy a 32" 16:9
display for the home, it would be a 1440p display. Anything 16:9 bigger than
32" is a TV, not a monitor. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4567625</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2020 03:37:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4567625</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4567625@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Now that I think about it, I probably could have gotten a 4K (3840x2160) for
the same cost as my ultrawide 2K (3440x1440).  I really do love my ultrawide
though.  It has a gentle curve, it hovers over the desk with the pole-mount
stand I got for it, and it's just a pleasure to spend the day looking at it.
 I don't find myself wishing I had more screen space, like I did with my 1920x1200
(16:10) monitor.  I could use the laptop screen as a second display but I
don't need it. 
  
 So really the only problem is that the oddball resolution continues to confound
any KVM switch that I throw at it. 
  
 What I really want is for ${work} to get us moved onto VDI so I don't need
the work computer except when traveling. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4566265</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 21:57:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4566265</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4566265@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 True 4K displays are super cheap these days. I have one at the office (which
I haven't been to in months because of Covid.) I also work off of 4K at home:
I sit down in a butterfly chair, with my laptop in my lap, connected via a
USB-C multiport hub to the HDMI input on my 55" LG C9. 
  
 The laptop is an Ice Lake running Ubuntu, and the USB-C negotiation still
isn't sorted out, which I've posted about ad nauseum in Linux>, but it's working
acceptably well at this point. 
  
 Anyway, I think my office monitor was probably like a $250 item. My OLED
at home, an order of magnitude more, but that's another story. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4566261</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 21:43:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4566261</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4566261@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[What I need is a dumb switch rather than something that tries to spoof the
signal in both directions.  I've got half a mind to find an old 25-pin parallel
printer switch and solder HDMI cables onto it.  My monitor uses an uncommon
resolution (3440x1440) so the switches just don't know how to deal with it.
 If the display is *already running* it manages to do the right thing, but
if any component disconnects and it has to re-negotiate the video mode, I
get half a minute of flickering followed by it settling in at 1024x768. 
  
 I'd probably have better luck with a "true 4K" screen at 3840x2160, but I
wanted an ultrawide. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4566228</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 19:03:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4566228</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4566228@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Maybe I got that wrong - might support 4K@60, just not HDR. I never use it
because it does have limitations, so I use the TV to select inputs. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4566222</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 18:38:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4566222</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4566222@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 It's not like these things are hard to build; the one on my surround receiver
works fine (although only supports 4K@30 because it's a little older. Newer
Sony products support 4K@60. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4566182</link><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2020 15:17:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4566182</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4566182@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Feh.  I give up.</p>
<p>I bought a "TESmart 18 Gbps HDMI 2.0 4-port KVM" for my computers.  It worked for about a day, while all of the computers and the monitor were happy with each other and still sort of remembered how everything was working.  This morning, I sat down to use the computers and only got occasional flickers of the screen, eventually coming up and settling at 1024x768.</p>
<p>I bought it from Shamazon instead of eBay to make sure I could return it if I needed to, and I do.</p>
<p>I think I'm stuck with a USB switch and the input select on the monitor.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4561627</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:25:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4561627</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4561627@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 Early availability of B550's is starting to show up, but the price needs
to be around $100. That was supposed to be the whole point.   
  
  
 https://www.newegg.com/p/pl?N=100007625%20601292786%20601352805 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4561620</link><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 12:07:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4561620</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4561620@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Yeesssss. She earned it!!! 
  
 https://www.cnn.com/2020/06/01/tech/lisa-su-amd-highest-paid-ceo/index.html

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4561472</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 21:40:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4561472</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4561472@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Not me. Only HDMI switch I've used in the last 5 years or so is a 7.2-channel
home AV receiver. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4561097</link><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 15:32:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4561097</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4561097@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Does anyone have a recommendation for an HDMI 2.0 + USB KVM switch?  Every one I can find on Teh Intarwebs has mixed reviews.  I have an LG ultrawide monitor (3440x1440) and the cheapie switch I have now is so bad that I ended up cutting off the HDMI cables and just using it for USB switching, and the monitor's inputs for video switching.</p>
<p>I probably shouldn't trust online reviews because they tend to be biased towards people who had problems.   I'm just not ready to spend another $120-300 on another switch that won't work.  I need support for HDMI 2.0 at the full 18 Gbps rate, which lots of sellers in the CCC pipeline <em>say</em> they have, whether they do or not.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4530321</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 18:46:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4530321</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4530321@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I always look at Backblaze's report to get an idea of drive life. 
  
 https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-drive-stats-for-2019/ 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4530318</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 18:38:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4530318</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4530318@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Personally, I like Seagate Ironwolf as it's got 7200rpm in the higher capacities,
but if you're just doing backups it's probably fine. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4530317</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 18:37:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4530317</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4530317@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 That looks like the WD Red, so yes 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4530303</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 18:12:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4530303</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4530303@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Right ... what I'm wondering is whether these features actually exist in the
drives I'm seeing on Best Buy (yeah I know, but I've got credit card bonus
points to spend, and that's the only electronics shop on the list) which are
labeled "Internal SATA NAS Hard Drive for Desktops". 
  
 What the heck is a NAS drive "for desktops" ? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4530260</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 15:15:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4530260</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4530260@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 NAS and enterprise drives have rotational-vibration sensors that desktop
hard drives lack, and support time-limited error recovery in their firmware.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4530047</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2020 23:10:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: &quot;NAS&quot; drives</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4530047@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[It's going to be a backup drive, holding nightly backups (created with rsync)
from the primary drives on the same machine, and from the disks at another
location.  btrfs snapshots are used to keep seven days of differential backups.

  
 When the nightly backup is not running, the drive (currently a much smaller
one) is idle, and is configured to spin down when not in use. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4529757</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 23:47:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: &quot;NAS&quot; drives</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4529757@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Looking through cheap-and-deep disks on various web sites, I see some 
     
 >of them are labeled as "NAS drives".  Comments suggest that these may  
    
 >be rated to handle higher thermal and mechanical tolerances, because   
   
 >they are expected to be operating around-the-clock.  I'm wondering if  
    
 >this is just marketing malarkey or if there really is a difference.    
  
      
 The main difference, as far as I have heard, is that the drive manufacturer
may not honor the warrantee if you are using the drives for tasks they are
not designed for.     
    
 Probably not a big issue for small consumers, since the manufacturer is unlikely
to know what you are doing with the drives. I am running servers using desktop
hardware. If I had real production servers under heavy load I would invest
in something with a RAID controller, multiple power supplies and the like.
For a bunch
of servers with 5 users tops, devoted to distributing My Little Pony cartoons?
Hard to justify the expense.   
  
 I don't know what do you intend to do with your NAS, but if it is for personal
use, I bet the drives won't be put to heavy strain. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4529657</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2020 17:32:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4529657</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4529657@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The claim with NAS drives is that they have better vibration tolerance and
cooling.  They're rated over a million hours MTBF as to a few hundred thousand
hours....  But I have no idea how they vet those numbers...... 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4529466</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2020 22:20:55 -0000</pubDate><title>&quot;NAS&quot; drives</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4529466@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I'm about to replace the disk in my main machine that I use as a backup volume.
 It stores backup copies of the data from my primary disks (which are SSD)
and from my servers over at the big data center. 
  
 Looking through cheap-and-deep disks on various web sites, I see some of
them are labeled as "NAS drives".  Comments suggest that these may be rated
to handle higher thermal and mechanical tolerances, because they are expected
to be operating around-the-clock.  I'm wondering if this is just marketing
malarkey or if there really is a difference. 
  
 Since this is a write intensive and non performance sensitive workload, spinning
disks are ideal here.  After the daily backup job finishes, the system's inactivity
timer spins down the drive, to reduce power and noise. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4529461</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2020 22:11:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4529461</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4529461@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Consumer grade printers usually ship with "starter ink" cartridges which are
only partially filled.  When the printers are sold as a loss leader to sell
expensive ink, this is of course done to prevent consumers from simply buying
a new printer every time they run out of ink. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4528519</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 23:13:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4528519</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4528519@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2020-02-26 15:38 from zooer     
 >I know someone mentioned this before... I can not believe that    
 >printer ink costs almost twice as much as a new printer.  My only    
 >question is, does a new printer come with ink or does that have to be  
 
 >purchased separately?      
 >    
 >     
 >    
    
 Most new printers come with at least some ink.   
  
 With some laser printers, you can be printing for a whole year with the cartridge
included with the machine. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4528490</link><pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 20:38:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4528490</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4528490@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I know someone mentioned this before... I can not believe that printer ink costs almost twice as much as a new printer.  My only question is, does a new printer come with ink or does that have to be purchased separately? </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4519870</link><pubDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 14:23:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4519870</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4519870@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[That's just it, the LJ5 is built like a *real* business workhorse, and I can
replace the toner for about $25.  I'm not letting it go. 
  
 The paper type hasn't changed; in fact, it was midway through the third ream
of a 3-pack of the same type of paper when the problem started happening.
 The suggestion about the rollers is a decent one.  I suppose I should also
field strip it as much as I can and hit it with compressed air in case there's
any debris lodged in the paper train anywhere. 
  
 I've heard of printers needing new imaging drums at some point in their lives,
but those don't create paper jams when they need replacing, do they? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4519348</link><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 21:09:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4519348</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4519348@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm not a printer guy, but aren't there some rubber parts that take the paper
and do the feed? I'd imagine they'd get stiff with age. 
  
 I'm with you on the printer. First, if I ever need color prints, it's more
cost effective to go somewhere else with it. I did have to get a new one a
few years ago, but small business lasers are still loads cheaper in the long
run over than ink jets. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4518458</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2020 15:06:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4518458</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4518458@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > (I refuse to buy a new printer, because they no longer sell     
 >non-disposable printers for less than $1000000000000)     
 >     
 >    
    
 Actually, printer-makers don't care much if the printer is disposeable or
not. Their business model is to sell ink to you.   
  
 Have you noticed the jamming just after switching the type of paper you feed
to the printer? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4518340</link><pubDate>Sun, 19 Jan 2020 04:10:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4518340</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4518340@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Dear Lazyweb:  I have a reliable old HP LaserJet 5 printer, which has been
printing plain black and white pages in my home for a long time now.  Recently
it has started jamming a lot.  Print two pages, "remove paper jam".  It always
jams in the same place, with one sheet nearly out and another one on the way.
  It *never* jams when I manually feed one page at a time through the sheet
feeder. 
  
 What are the common causes of this kind of problem, and what parts/maintenance
can be tried to fix it? 
  
 (I refuse to buy a new printer, because they no longer sell non-disposable
printers for less than $1000000000000) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4518063</link><pubDate>Sat, 18 Jan 2020 04:17:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4518063</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4518063@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Make it look like WOPR. (I just re-watched that. Free on Vudu recently.)

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4517240</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 04:22:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4517240</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4517240@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The new build passed the smoke test.  Tomorrow I will move all of my disks
into it and bring it into production use. 
  
 I'm glad I bought a new case and power supply instead of reusing an old one.
 Things have really evolved over the last ten years.  It's technically still
the same ATX form factor, and a new motherboard will fit into an old case,
but the power connectors are different, there's now space for 2.5" storage
devices, and they've added all sorts of slots and tiedowns for people who
want to dress the cables to make it look nice.  And of course there's that
matte black finish on everything, which I like much better than the old beige
boxes. 
  
 There's not going to be any RGB lighting on this one, though.  That's a bit
too ghetto for me.  But the motherboard has two headers on it, to connect
both addressable and non-addressable LED strip.  I'm thinking about drilling
some holes
in an empty drive bay cover and adding some panel-mounted LEDs to connect
to that header, to have some more *traditional* blinkenlichten. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4515809</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 22:07:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4515809</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4515809@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 The days of AMD being a bit player are changing fast. EPYC products are now
deployed on a massive scale in data centers and taken very seriously. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4515124</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 20:54:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4515124</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4515124@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[How so?  I've been very pleased with AMD processors I've bought in the past.
 Never had any problems.  Ryzen processors happen to be really well regarded
by the entire industry now, too ... they've vastly surpassed Intel in price/performance
and in some cases on raw performance.  If I wanted to punish myself I'd buy
a Mac :) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4515102</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 19:26:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4515102</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4515102@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[AMD - I see you're still a glutton for punishment.   
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4514841</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 22:39:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4514841</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4514841@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Nice. The 3400G looks like the one to have if you're looking for integrated
graphics. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4514830</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 22:08:48 -0000</pubDate><title>My haul from Micro Center :)</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4514830@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>AMD Ryzen 3400G APU, Micron RAM, a PowerSpec 550W power supply, ASRock B450M Pro4 motherboard (all of the motherboards are basically the same because they all use  the same AMD chipset anyway), and a Thermaltake mid-tower case.   Here's a photo of my haul:</p>
<p><img src="
<p>As always, I shopped at Micro Center because Amazon is The Great Satan and I would prefer to patronize a (somewhat) local store.</p>
<p>I'm getting ready for a short trip out of town right now, so the build will begin next week.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4514570</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2020 22:07:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4514570</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4514570@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The "G" in the model number and the "APU" designation are more [or less the
same thing.  Their claim is that the built-in GPU is a few steps above what
typical "integrated" graphics can provide, but not quite up to par with a
separate graphics card. 
  
 I went through the System Builder application on the MicroCenter web site
and put my parts list together.  I almost fell into the trap of not having
any graphics because the Socket AM4 motherboards are compatible with Ryzen
CPUs, and they *say* they have integrated graphics, but as previously noted,
that only means it has a passthrough for the Ryzen APUs.  Technically it *is*
compatible, but they expect that if you buy a plain CPU, you're also going
to buy a SuperMegaDoomDestroyer video card. 
  
 I haven't built a computer in a *long* time.  This will be interesting. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4514511</link><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jan 2020 14:20:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4514511</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4514511@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Yeah, I knew about the G suffixed parts but had some trouble finding them
on AMDs website at first. It gets a little confusing about whether you're
talking about these or the "APU" products -- I'm not sure what the distinction
is. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4514111</link><pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2020 01:23:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4514111</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4514111@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, ignore that :) 
  
 After careful reading I learned that the 450 chipset's "integrated graphics"
consist of "use an AMD CPU with integrated graphics and we will route that
signal to the video ports".  So I'm going for the Ryzen 5 3400G (4 cores,
8 threads, 65 watts) and going with a cheaper (but larger) case.  I don't
need a transparent case; this thing is going to sit on the floor like a real
computer. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4512805</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Dec 2019 20:28:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4512805</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4512805@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Here's a first draft of my build, coming in at about $350.  My budget is $450 so there's room to improve anything that turns out to be underpowered.</p>
<p>As previously mentioned, I don't need or want a video card, because I don't play PC games, so I only need enough display oomph to render the desktop and play some video.  And I already have my disks, a pair of Intel 800 GB SSD as the primary disks plus another HDD for backup.</p>
<p> </p>
<table class="mc-Configurator">
<thead>
<tr><th>Name</th><th>Item</th><th>Qty</th><th>Price</th></tr>
</thead>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td class="mc-picture"><img src="https://90a1c75758623581b3f8-5c119c3de181c9857fcb2784776b17ef.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/0478826_299891.jpg" alt="AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz 6 Core AM4 Boxed Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler" /></td>
<td class="mc-name">CPU</td>
<td class="mc-product"><a href="https://www.microcenter.com/product/478826/amd-ryzen-5-1600-32ghz-6-core-am4-boxed-processor-with-wraith-spire-cooler">AMD Ryzen 5 1600 3.2GHz 6 Core AM4 Boxed Processor with Wraith Spire Cooler</a></td>
<td class="mc-qty">1</td>
<td class="mc-price">$79.99 EACH</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="mc-picture"><img src="https://90a1c75758623581b3f8-5c119c3de181c9857fcb2784776b17ef.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/0509729_802561.jpg" alt="ASRock B450 PRO4 AM4 ATX AMD Motherboard" /></td>
<td class="mc-name">Motherboard</td>
<td class="mc-product"><a href="https://www.microcenter.com/product/509729/asrock-b450-pro4-am4-atx-amd-motherboard">ASRock B450 PRO4 AM4 ATX AMD Motherboard</a></td>
<td class="mc-qty">1</td>
<td class="mc-price">$89.99 EACH</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="mc-picture"><img src="https://90a1c75758623581b3f8-5c119c3de181c9857fcb2784776b17ef.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/0608784_961102.jpg" alt="Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB 2 x 8GB DDR4-2666 PC4-21300 CL16 Dual Channel Desktop Memory Kit 2K8G4D26BFSBK - Gray" /></td>
<td class="mc-name">RAM</td>
<td class="mc-product"><a href="https://www.microcenter.com/product/608784/crucial-ballistix-sport-lt-16gb-2-x-8gb-ddr4-2666-pc4-21300-cl16-dual-channel-desktop-memory-kit-2k8g4d26bfsbk---gray">Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 16GB 2 x 8GB DDR4-2666 PC4-21300 CL16 Dual Channel Desktop Memory Kit 2K8G4D26BFSBK - Gray</a></td>
<td class="mc-qty">1</td>
<td class="mc-price">$65.99 EACH</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="mc-picture"><img src="https://90a1c75758623581b3f8-5c119c3de181c9857fcb2784776b17ef.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/0610144_973669.jpg" alt="Corsair 110R Tempered Glass ATX Mid-Tower Computer Case - Black" /></td>
<td class="mc-name">Case</td>
<td class="mc-product"><a href="https://www.microcenter.com/product/610144/corsair-110r-tempered-glass-atx-mid-tower-computer-case---black">Corsair 110R Tempered Glass ATX Mid-Tower Computer Case - Black</a></td>
<td class="mc-qty">1</td>
<td class="mc-price">$62.99 EACH</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td class="mc-picture"><img src="https://90a1c75758623581b3f8-5c119c3de181c9857fcb2784776b17ef.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/0485311_402396.jpg" alt="PowerSpec 550 Watt 80 Plus Bronze ATX Fixed Power Supply" /></td>
<td class="mc-name">Power Supply</td>
<td class="mc-product"><a href="https://www.microcenter.com/product/485311/powerspec-550-watt-80-plus-bronze-atx-fixed-power-supply">PowerSpec 550 Watt 80 Plus Bronze ATX Fixed Power Supply</a></td>
<td class="mc-qty">1</td>
<td class="mc-price">$47.99 EACH</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td> </td>
<td class="mc-total">Total</td>
<td class="mc-total-price">$346.95</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td> </td>
<td class="mc-link">Generated by <a href="https://www.microcenter.com">Micro Center</a> 12/30/2019 3:16:08 PM</td>
<td> </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4511966</link><pubDate>Fri, 27 Dec 2019 01:40:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4511966</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4511966@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I'm using 65W Intel products with the retail box cooler and it's reasonably
quiet. I do have one of those cases with a bit of soundproof padding. 
  
 With an over-engineered aftermarket cooler it would be even quieter. 
  
 Used to use those 95W Pentium IV's at the office, back in the day, and those
sounded like a jet engine. Same with the one I bought for my mom. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4511924</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 22:39:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4511924</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4511924@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Ah, ok so I do see that now, the ones with built-in graphics are called "APU"

  
 I'm shopping the CPU/motherboard bundles at Micro Center and it looks like
the graphics power I want (hardware accelerated but not "gamer grade") is
included on even the low end motherboards now. 
  
 Good point about the power consumption and fan requirements.  Running reasonably
quiet (not necessarily "silent") is desirable because the rig will operate
24/7 in a home office that doubles as a guest bedroom.  If the fan ramps up
when I render a video, that's fine, but if it ramps up in the middle of the
night for no good reason, that's not quite as fine. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4511898</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:19:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4511898</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4511898@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 my mistake, the 3800x is at 105W, so it's 61% more power consumption for
8% more clock speed. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4511896</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:17:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4511896</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4511896@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 65W vs 95W, you're talking 8% more base clock for 46% more power consumption.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4511894</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Dec 2019 21:15:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4511894</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4511894@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Looks like there's no integrated graphics on Ryzen 7. You need to buy one
of their APU models if that's what you want. 
  
 My personal choice would be the Ryzen 7 3700x because that's the latest lithography
and comes with 8 cores in a 65W power envelope. I'm not a fan of the 95W products
because I don't like my space sounding like somebody parked an unmuffled jet
engine in there. 
  
 Ryzen 5 = 6 codes, Ryzen 7 = 8 cores 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4511042</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Dec 2019 05:37:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4511042</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4511042@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > In this day and age, your compile farm is in the cloud, your   
 >deployment fleet is in the cloud, etc. You don't need an ARM laptop to 
 
 >target an ARM server.   
  
 *Your* compile farm and deployment fleet are in the cloud.  This probably
means you have the luxury of having built and/or chosen only cloud-native
applications.  It's a nice place to be if you can make that happen, because
it gives you the flexibility to deploy a lot of different ways.  ARM as a
server does sound neato.  I 
   
 Elsewhere in the industry, there are gigantic catalogs of software that are
keeping people stuck on legacy technologies such as x86 and even Windows.
 Hybrid cloud is popular with enterprise shops for this reason. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4510798</link><pubDate>Sun, 22 Dec 2019 00:57:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4510798</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4510798@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[So let's talk about this some more.  I ahaven't built a computer in years
and you can only learn so much from watching Linus Tech Tips.  I think I want
to go with AMD, mainly because I just love an underdog.  What's the difference
between the Ryzen 5 and 7, and what's the difference between the 2nd and 3rd
gen?  The 3rd gen are twice the price (I'm looking at CPU/Motherboard bundles).
 I am not a gamer, so I don't need to push polygons at 120 FPS.  I need good
snappy desktop performance for simple productivity type work, and media performance
good enough for video and audio editing. 
  
 Ryzen is a combo CPU/GPU, right?  Or am I thinking of something else? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4510528</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 20:11:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4510528</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4510528@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>ARC servers are only "real" if you have a big enough corporate expense account.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4510525</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 19:52:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4510525</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4510525@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 ARM server hardware is very, very real, and currently deployed on a massive
scale, even if the support ecosystem is a bit bespoke. 
  
 In this day and age, your compile farm is in the cloud, your deployment fleet
is in the cloud, etc. You don't need an ARM laptop to target an ARM server.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4510510</link><pubDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2019 18:17:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4510510</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4510510@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"Without an Arm Desktop PC, Arm Servers are just a novelty that individuals will continue to test, evaluate, and ultimately discard as not worth the switching costs, as has occured for the past 5 years."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>implying you can go out and buy an ARM server</p>
<p> </p>
<p>"In the past, it was difficult to actually find Arm Server hardware available to individual end-users."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>But now we live in the glorious future of flying cars where any old Joe can purchase one of these novelties.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Thank God most of these people don't get paid to write this crap.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4509071</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:58:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4509071</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4509071@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Patience, grasshopper.  Since my need is not urgent I intend to savor the
planning and building.  I also intend to hunt around some discard piles for
non-obsolete components such as the case and power supply, so that I can spend
more of my budget on things like CPU and RAM.  And maybe a watercooling line
that runs outside to the creek in my front yard.  (Ok that last bit was fantasy
but it's fun to think about.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4508374</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 23:40:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4508374</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4508374@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a 10,000 square foot serverless data center in my backyard.  It uses
no electricity and doesn't require a network.  I am happy to report that I've
achieved 100.00% uptime, and am maintaining a 1.0 power factor.  It's also
"green" (at least in the summer). 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4508344</link><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2019 20:22:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4508344</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4508344@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Yeah. Although serverless is the way to go where you can. For static content.

  
 At this very moment I'm working on retiring a couple of nginx instances (that
only serve static) and replacing them with S3+CloudFront. This should be cheaper
*and* scale way better, if I got the estimate remotely right. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4508015</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 18:57:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4508015</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4508015@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[So buy (or build) the damned thing already. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4508012</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Dec 2019 18:53:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4508012</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4508012@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The ARM stuff is definitely cheaper to run in AWS. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4505479</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 21:48:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4505479</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4505479@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Coincidentally, this just popped up in the news: 
  
 https://www.anandtech.com/show/15181/aws-designs-32core-arm-cpu-for-cloud-servers

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4505417</link><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2019 17:40:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4505417</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4505417@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Well, the chips are also cheaper and simpler, right? I haven't looked at
the pricing, but it stands to reason that ARM servers should be cheaper per
instance-hour. AWS even offers AMD-based servers that are cheaper per instance-hour
than the Intel equivalent. It's not the most recent product from AMD, so it's
noted that you don't get the same level of CPU performance. But some applications
are more I/O bound, and don't typically *need* the full CPU performance. 
  
 I have a small fleet of machines that definitely falls into that category.
The workloads are very short-duration spikey and our CPUs are spending the
vast majority of the time idle. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4505131</link><pubDate>Sun, 01 Dec 2019 22:29:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4505131</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4505131@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[What's the motivation to do that?  Do they charge less per unit of compute
because it consumes less power? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4503271</link><pubDate>Sun, 24 Nov 2019 21:34:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4503271</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4503271@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 When I made the decision to keep all of my personal computing needs off of
my work computer, I started with a Raspberry Pi.  Then I moved to an Intel
NUC that Ragnar gave me a few months ago, and that's what I'm using now. 
And now that I have the latest Kubuntu running on my big LG ultrawide monitor,
it looks soooooooo good that it made me decide... 
  
 I want a computer. 
  
 A real computer.  A "main" computer.  One with a nice fast processor and
room for several disks so I can retire the old laptop with external drives
hanging off it in the garage that I'm using as a NAS.  One that can sit on
my desk and be THE computer.  One that I can mount an LCD onto the front panel
to display the date and time from the attached GPS puck because it's also
my NTP server. 
  
 It's been too long. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4499658</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 15:24:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4499658</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4499658@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Pretty much, right? This is the highest-volume product these days, and it's
also the one that can be manufactured with the best yields. 
  
 I would probably be able to make use of some of the ARM-based hardware that's
showing up on AWS, but I just don't want to be bothered setting up the toolchain...

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4499646</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:35:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4499646</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4499646@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[So ... Apple is hogging all the fabs for ARM production?  Am I reading that
correctly? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4495728</link><pubDate>Sun, 27 Oct 2019 14:59:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4495728</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4495728@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Intel (and AMD) shortages will continue 
  
 https://www.anandtech.com/show/15031/intel-boosts-14nm-capacity-25-in-2019-but-shortages-will-persist-in-q4

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4489900</link><pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 2019 18:41:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4489900</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4489900@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 https://www.tomshardware.com/news/apple-increasing-iphone-11-production-a13-7nm-tsmc-amd,40553.html

  
 "7nm Supply Showdown: AMD, Nvidia May Fight for Scraps as Apple Reportedly
Ups A13 Production" 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4489646</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 20:24:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4489646</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4489646@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 I dunno... I guess TSMC is getting adequate yield out of their 7nm, but probably
most of that supply is going to Apple for the iPhone 11 Pro. And those are
small chips, which are easier to manufacture.   
  
  
 So it makes sense that Intel is sticking to the better-yielding process to
supply industry demand. All very disappointing, though. 
  
 It'll be interesting to see how this all plays out over the next 6 to 18
months. AMD's strategy of building multiple-small-chip packages on TSMC 7nm
is starting to look smart. But I wonder if AMD/TSMC will really be able to
ramp up supply enough to gain market share. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4489443</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Oct 2019 01:58:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4489443</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4489443@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Ugh.  So they built a product with a bad flaw in it, and in response, people
are buying more product from them, increasing their revenues while they revert
back to an older, crappier version of the product? 
  
 The way the tech industry rewards shittiness is appalling sometimes. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4488846</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2019 15:50:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4488846</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4488846@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA["Intels high demand has been of particular note since mid-2018. Since the
discovery of hardware vulnerabilities such as Spectre and Meltdown, and the
fixes that reduced overall performance of a large number of the installed
server base, many of Intel customers have been increasing the size of their
server deployments in order to re-match their original capacity. This issue
caused a sharp up-tick in demand of Intel processors, and Intel has driven
newer architectures that try to minimise those performance deficits (with
an overall performance uplift when the new architecture is factored in). As
a result, Intel moved some of its fabrication capacity away from its future
10nm process and back onto its 14nm in order to meet demand." 
  
 --https://www.anandtech.com/show/14909/intel-supply-in-q4-output-capacity-up-supplydemand-still-high

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4487583</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 14:34:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4487583</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4487583@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 4k requires jacking up your DPI setting so that fonts render larger. There's
little benefit to those extra pixels besides the economic stimulus of selling
more DisplayPort cables (HDMI connections will usually force 30Hz refresh.)

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4487402</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2019 00:55:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4487402</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4487402@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Well there's the thing ... I am a data center architect, so I've got a lot
on my screen all day long.  I do a lot of network diagrams, so being able
to have a big Visio on the screen while I have documentation and/or terminals
going at the same time. 
  
 I have the monitor set up and am looking at it for the first time right now.
 And I can definitely say 2K is optimal here.  Enough resolution to be readable
at small font sizes, but not ridiculously dense. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4487369</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 21:19:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4487369</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4487369@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[What are you using the screen for?     
    
 I don't invest much in screens. I usually just get a good deal in second
hand ones which suffice to ssh into uncensored and to do offimatics. You can
get quite nice screens for 10 bucks if you go second hand.   
  
 But then I am a broke dude so... 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4487351</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 20:05:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4487351</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4487351@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>4K does seem excessive, particularly since I've already reached the age where I can't stare at small fonts all day anymore.  This monitor is considered a "2K" (3440x1440) and I just need to fit a lot of stuff on the screen at once.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4487339</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 19:03:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4487339</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4487339@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I'm typing this on a 30"-ish Samsung 4k. Nice screen real estate but unnecessarily
high pixel density means some degree of fiddling and compatibility issues.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4487296</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2019 15:56:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4487296</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4487296@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[*sigh*  My main monitor is starting to show signs of trouble, and I may replace
it as early as today.  I'm thinking about an ultrawide.  Any thoughts on those?
 LG makes ultrawides that even let you split the display between two computers
(which happens to be the exact way I work all day).  Of course, for the $500
I am looking at spending [ https://www.microcenter.com/product/460907/34UC88-B_34_UW-QHD_75Hz_HDMI_DP_FreeSync_Curved_LED_Monitor
] I could probably buy two regular monitors, but then I'd be staring straight
at a pair of bezels all day, which might bother me. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4485788</link><pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 19:32:04 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4485788</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4485788@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Also late to the party, I'm finally upgrading from mechanical RAID1 to an
SSD. SATA-based. Really should have bought a z97 motherboard when I built
this PC 5 years ago; that would have supported NVMe 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4481611</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Sep 2019 18:39:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4481611</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4481611@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 About a decade and a half late to the party ... I finally bought my first
Arduino.  Two of them, actually (a couple of Nano clones, along with some
extra parts to play around with).   
    
 I wish I had access to this stuff when I was a kid playing around with LEDs
and other electronic components.  I had to make do with the Radio Shack electronics
kits.  For that matter, I wish I had access to this stuff in the late 1990's
when I was playing around with home automation.   
    
 It seems like the really good components started coming out right after I
got out of the hobby.   
  
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4479595</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:48:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4479595</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4479595@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Looks like AMD is playing a sly marketing game with their maximum advertised
boost frequency. https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/amd-ryzen-3000-turbo-boost-frequency-analysis,6253.html

  
 Nonetheless, their new EPYC product is game-changing. If you can get a hold
of one. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4479593</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 15:39:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4479593</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4479593@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Looks like the *industry as a whole* still undergoing CPU shortages. Both
AMD and Intel 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4478089</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 18:56:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4478089</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4478089@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Who knows whether they can really scale supply like people might want; this
may be a bit of a PR launch. Time will tell. Great product though, if you
can get a hold of one. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4478070</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2019 16:58:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4478070</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4478070@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I like it.  All server manufacturers should immediately switch to AMD.  Chipzilla
needs to be taken down a few pegs. 
  
 This would be just the thing for "ultra high density computing".  Those servers
are insane.  We have customers putting those in some of our colocation data
centers now.  35-40 kilowatts per cabinet, with chilled water being fed into
each server.  One rack with ultra high density servers has the same computing
power as an entire row of racks (7 to 10) with conventional air-cooled servers.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4474461</link><pubDate>Sat, 10 Aug 2019 15:04:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4474461</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4474461@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 https://www.anandtech.com/show/14694/amd-rome-epyc-2nd-gen 
  
 Interesting times. This thing just rendered Intel's entire Xeon lineup obsolete.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4473988</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 02:24:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4473988</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4473988@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[People are starting to realize that college isn't the automatic best choice
anymore.  The big decline hasn't started yet, but people are starting to wake
up to the fact that the pussification of our young people now masquerading
as an education isn't actually worth much in the real world. 
  
 Trades are still in demand, still fairly easy to get into as an apprentice,
and still pay well once you get a few years in. 
  
 Have a plan, know the skill you want to learn, and how you intend to apply
it in the workforce.  And then keep learning.  Learn something new every day,
or you die stupid. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4473967</link><pubDate>Fri, 09 Aug 2019 00:50:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4473967</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4473967@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I can't speak for every country, but the gut feeling I have is that the main reason why it is hard to replace old, valid professionals is because we are just not making new, valid pros anymore.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My time in college was a joke. I learnt a lot of things, half of them useful, but I didn't learn a profession. In the middle ages, if you wanted to be a master builder, you became an apprentice to a master builder and your learnt your crap working and knowing how stuff was done in real life. Now you go to a building where they feed you a government aproved program that does not necessarily match the needs of the customers you will have to satisfy once you are out. End result is that, depending on the season, I am managing 2 or 3 jobs at once and none is rellated to my formal education at all.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I was once inscribed to a crash code training program alongside a lot of fifteen people who had just got their computer sicence degrees. They only knew Java, and not very good Java at that. Many didn't know network concepts that are very basic. It is ok to not be an expert just after college, but there is a minimum, and I suspect many education programs in the West are not meeting it. I mean, my experience with coding before that training program was a bit of ksh and the exercises of some old Perl book and I was already in a better starting position than most of the classmates. Does anybody expect an educative system such as this one to produce reliable professionals to replace the old ones?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4469314</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jul 2019 13:04:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4469314</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4469314@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Not computer hardware, but to go with the conversation, the US is losing a number of specialists due to age and jobs being shifted to other countries.   There is a type of power plant that is still in use around the world, and there are last I knew two engineers that have the level of expertise to do a complete shutdown, restart and troubleshooting of that power plant.  However my information is from 2015.  In 2014 there were 3 people in the world with that knowledge, my father-in-law was one of them.  He and the other two were working on a book, so that others could work on those plants.   </p>
<p>I wonder if no one bothered to learn those jobs, and that is why you can only fill a conference room with the number of tooling engineers in America.   Just like that power plant, everyone wanted to work on the newest greatest thing, and as a result till it is needed, the people that know it will slowly die off.   </p>
<p>My father-in-law was able to command a very high price as a consultant when he would work, due to being one of a select few.  </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4469110</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:44:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4469110</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4469110@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 There was an interesting article a while back. Said that you could fill a
few footballs fields with the tooling engineers in China. In the US, you would
be lucky to fill a large conference room. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4469093</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 20:11:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4469093</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4469093@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >expertise at some point. It's already happening. You can't find any   
 >tooling engineers in this country anymore because they're all in China.
 
  
 Actually LS. There are still some in the US. My dad is one. But it's hard
as heck to find them. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4469090</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:58:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4469090</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4469090@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[   
 I don't want to argue either for or against the generalizations. What I'm
saying is this: get used to the contractors, and the consultants, and the
more junior developers. They're not going away, they're going to define *how*
things get done, whether we like it or not, by the simple act of *doing it*
without seeking our advice. They need to be treated with professionalism and
a modicum of respect, and you and I as the old guys in the room need to continue
to figure out how to compete and earn our paychecks. That is all. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4469073</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 19:19:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4469073</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4469073@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Those cheap foreigners are going to run us over with their superior   
 >expertise at some point. It's already happening. You can't find any   
 >tooling engineers in this country anymore because they're all in China.
 
  
 How is that distinguishable from "you can't find any tooling engineers in
this country anymore because their jobs were all shipped off to China" ? 
  
 I don't work in the semiconductor biz, and maybe it's different there.  All
I know is that in IT when I see a name like "Rumjumtunesh Balasubrishkarvar"
I know I'm usually talking to a halfwit whose only talent is a willingness
to work for peanuts. 
  
 Yes there are always exceptions. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4469001</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:53:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4469001</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4469001@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 By the way, I was one of those people who bought Netburst even though it
sucked. I owned, I can't excactly a remember, a 2.something ghz P4, and specced
out a 3.0ghz P4 with hyperthreading for my mom. 
  
 We bought the hype. We thought Intel knew what they were doing, and that
the Ghz was more important. But the benchmark numbers were telling. AMD was
winning on performance per watt. 
  
 But we convinced ourselves that this disadvantage would go away when developers
started optimizing their code for the P4's longer pipelines. That never happened,
and Intel ended up backtracking. Conroe's pipelines were half the length.
Intel was doing what AMD was doing, again. Only better, because Conroe was
wider superscalar, it could dispatch 1 more instruction per clock cycle. Intel
started winning on IPC and TDP again. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4468994</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:46:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4468994</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4468994@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Well, you are right in a marketing sense - AMD has never really THREATENED
Intel in an existential sort of way, except during the whole Netburst debacle,
but people kept buying Netburst anyway even though it sucked. 
  
 There is a difference between "being competitive" and "being an existential
threat.". 
   
 I welcome the newly competitive (on more than just price) AMD - perhaps they
will start turning a profit again. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4468993</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:40:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4468993</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4468993@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >market competition. AMD got to 1Ghz, the SEC backed off, AMD wasn't  
 >able to *scale* production, and shortly thereafter Intel announced it  
 >had broken 1Ghz, and flooded the market with processors. That was the  
 >LAST time AMD was a threat to Intel.   
  
 Disagree. Athlon 64 was the technically superior product until the introduction
of Conroe in August 2006. Netburst was a major misstep. There was a period
of several years, from the introduction of the original 1Ghz Athlon until
Conroe, where AMD products were a very smart choice. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4468992</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:37:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4468992</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4468992@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Intel's biggest liability right now is their fabs.  AMD doesn't own   
 >fabs and can send manufacturing to whatever fab has the process they   
  
 Used to be their asset, they used to have an 18-month lead on all the other
fab players. Now it's looking the other way around. 
  
 The transition to 10nm (TSMC calls it 7nm for marketing reasons, but it's
the same as Intel's 10nm) and EUV lithography has been difficult and brutal
for everyone in the industry. You can't do this with a bunch of lazyfuck engineers
sitting at their desks doing nothing and resting on the laurels of past successes.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4468991</link><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2019 14:32:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4468991</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4468991@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 Americans are overpriced and lazy. Americans don't want to compete with the
cheap foreigners -- they don't have to, their supervisors sit there and look
the other way while they act like lazy fucks and continue to collect their
paychecks.   
  
  
 Those cheap foreigners are going to run us over with their superior expertise
at some point. It's already happening. You can't find any tooling engineers
in this country anymore because they're all in China. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4468755</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jul 2019 16:50:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4468755</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4468755@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Replacing smart people with cheap foreigners doesn't sound like a recipe for
success, if their engineering talent is an ingredient in your product line.

  
 Intel's biggest liability right now is their fabs.  AMD doesn't own fabs
and can send manufacturing to whatever fab has the process they want to use
for a new chip.  And it doesn't hurt that AMD's integrated graphics are currently
running circles around Intel's. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4468496</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jul 2019 22:24:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4468496</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4468496@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Jul 12 2019 11:13:24 EDT</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Actually, Windows did not work AT ALL in this configuration. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I always experience this in discussion with people who like Linux - where all they ever run into is aggravation with Windows in any situation - and all I ever run into is aggravation with Linux in any situation. <br /><br />Makes me think, "maybe it isn't the OS - it is fate being a dick." </p>
<p> </p>
<p>As far AMD being competitive - I'm an ex-Intel employee. I was there when AMD beat us to 1Ghz. The thing is, no one inside Intel talks about it - but Intel was facing SEC Anti-Trust investigations at that point - for being anti-competitive and not having any meaningful market competition. AMD got to 1Ghz, the SEC backed off, AMD wasn't able to *scale* production, and shortly thereafter Intel announced it had broken 1Ghz, and flooded the market with processors. That was the LAST time AMD was a threat to Intel. <br /><br />So... I'm watching what is going on right now. Intel is executing poorly internally - from what my little birds tell me... of course, Intel has laid off most of my little birds at this point. Expensive white IT men over 40 aren't on their salary budget, it seems. But Intel is sneaky... and they're doing major construction here in Chandler for a company that recently laid of 5000 domestic employees while growing their non-domestic workforce. </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4466331</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 18:47:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4466331</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4466331@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 AMD processors finally looking competitive again. First time in 15 years...
I've been buying 65W-TDP Intel processors because I don't like my space sounding
like there's a jet engine running, and because the 65W class is plenty fast
enough. Finally AMD is a competitor in this space again. 
  
 The new generation of PCIe 4.0 SSDs are going to scream. Not even sure if
Intel will support those before 2021... 
  
 But I still have to migrate off an Intel RAID1 mechanical disk array... 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4466296</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jul 2019 15:13:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4466296</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4466296@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually, Windows did not work AT ALL in this configuration.  Windows performs
DDC negotiation at the moment the monitor is connected, while Linux does it
once at startup.  The intel video chip in the NUC can't handle the KVM switch,
so I have to plug the monitor directly in during startup.  Since Linux locks
in the video mode once it's running, I can switch back and forth.  If the
machine was running Windows (and I tried it), it would try and fail to renegotiate
every time I switched over. 
  
 It's amusing to watch.  Switching to the Linux machine happens instantly.
 Switching to the Windows machine takes about ten seconds before the screen
reappears. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4466083</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jul 2019 21:08:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4466083</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4466083@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>This is where Windows still has such a tremendous advantage. I've got a SP5 going into a Surface docking port, the port has two MiniDisplay outs. One goes to a DBsub 15 VGA and the other to HDMI, I've got two monitors, a 24" and a 27" - plus the Surface Pro screen. The 27" is only a KVM that is shared with another machine, that is also HDMI - but in the past was DVI out... <br /><br />I also have a HDMI splitter switch in there. <br /><br />It all works, right resolutions, auto-detect, I have to hit a button on the KVM to go to the right device... but I have the 27" hooked up to two machines - and I can have them both on and just hit the "mode" button and switch between analog and HDMI and it'll switch back and forth. <br /><br />I like Linux for a lot of things. But Windows dominates in this kind of convenience, and always has. There are certainly things you give up for that convenience. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4463978</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 22:13:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4463978</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4463978@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Ultimately, this will all become irrelevant.  The newest generation of computers
are capable of delivering video over USB 3.0 ports.  You've seen the new "docking
hubs" -- they don't even mate with the computer, they just have a single USB-C
cable that you plug in and it delivers everything. 
  
 This means that when everything catches up to that spec, a simple USB switch
will handle switching the keyboard, mouse, monitors, and everything else you
want to switch.  (This means that you'll need to connect the network and power
through some other port, of course.) 
  
 I believe that the most common personal rig of the future will look like
a slightly larger version of the Nintendo Switch.  They got it right.  When
the Switch is undocked, it is a fully usable and fully portable system.  When
you drop it, vertically, into the dock, it mates with a single USB-C connector
in the bottom of the slot. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4463845</link><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2019 10:53:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4463845</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4463845@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >It seems like this should be a thing, and a thing that works well. I  
 >can imagine it being expensive, though.    
  
 You would think this, but last I checked, no.  Nothing available. 
  
 I suspect it might have something to do with the data requirements of two
1080p monitors.  Maybe. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4463457</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2019 21:51:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4463457</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4463457@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Or build a new switch and market it 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4463234</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2019 22:18:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4463234</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4463234@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Part of all this is my own fault, of course.  Not only am I using a CheapChinese(tm)
KVM switch, but the signal is getting converted from HDMI to DVI on the Linux
machine, and from DisplayPort to HDMI to DVI on the Windows machine. 
  
 Someday I will get a new monitor and I'll just make sure it's one with multiple
inputs. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4462805</link><pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 22:29:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4462805</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4462805@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Mon Jun 24 2019 10:39:33 EDT</span> <span>from fleeb </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br /><br />I'd rather like to find a KVM that can handle two 'display' ports, a keyboard and mouse, and two or more computers. <br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>It seems like this should be a thing, and a thing that works well. I can imagine it being expensive, though. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4461949</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:39:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4461949</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4461949@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 *sigh* 
  
 I'd rather like to find a KVM that can handle two 'display' ports, a keyboard
and mouse, and two or more computers. 
  
 I've used one, but... it sucks.  Badly enough that I don't use it anymore.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4461571</link><pubDate>Sat, 22 Jun 2019 22:50:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4461571</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4461571@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Consumer grade KVM switches have a lot of things to try and deal with... and *nix video has always seemed to me to require a little more understanding of what goes on between the video card and the display. </p>
<p><br />HDMI has made things easier in a lot of ways - but it still isn't a silver bullet thing hooking up multiple machines to a single monitor/keyboard/mouse through a KVM. <br /><br /><br />I wish it were as nice as hooking up a bunch of Dell equipment to a Dell KVM - but then, all my stuff would be Dell... and that wouldn't be awesome. :) </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4460802</link><pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2019 20:10:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4460802</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4460802@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I might be wrong about all of the above, actually.  This particular computer
seems to work fine, without help, when the monitor is plugged directly in
to the computer during the boot process ... or at least it does when running
under Linux.  Xorg keeps the video mode in use once the display is up.  Windows
wants to try to hot plug. 
  
 My other computer seems to have no problem passing EDID through the switch,
under either operating system. 
  
 So I guess I'll just live with it for now.  The one computer doesn't get
rebooted much anyway, and when it does, I just have to bypass the switch to
do it.  As a slow-burn project I'll work on finding a way to get it to ignore
EDID and force-feed it the video mode I want to use.  The problem starts pre-boot,
though, and it won't even proceed through the hardware boot screens with the
switch attached. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4458727</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2019 04:06:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4458727</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4458727@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Final post (maybe) on this topic. 
  
 Apparently "xrandr" has some sort of persistence across reboots.  When I
created a custom video mode, it seems to have "learned" it and is capable
of using it again.  So I re-enabled my display manager and it's working at
the native resolution of the monitor. 
  
 But!  It only starts up properly when the monitor is plugged directly into
the computer.  It won't start properly when attached through the switch. 
So it's a nuisance, but I can live with it since I want to leave this computer
on all the time anyway, it's very low power, and my electric service is very
reliable. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4458399</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2019 03:54:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4458399</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4458399@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Progress! 
  
 I was able to force the video mode to 1900x1200 at 60 Hz using the "xrandr"
tool.  I got the command ready on the little monitor, then ran it while plugged
into the big monitor, and it is displaying perfectly. 
  
 Now I know the hardware is at least *capable* of displaying this resolution.
 I just have to figure out how to force it to use this mode at every startup.
 It's going to be tricky, but at least it's not the dead end of "use one of
the built-in modes or GFY" that I got with Windows. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4458021</link><pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2019 20:03:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4458021</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4458021@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Yes. built-in Intel video.  The model of this machine is DN2820FYK.  It's
a wonderful little machine except for this issue. 
  
 When I first hooked it up to the big monitor without rebooting, it kept the
resolution of the little monitor (Xorg doesn't hot-switch by default) which
is 1600x900.  It was blurry enough that it wasn't worth looking at.  But when
it boots under the big monitor, it doesn't find any working modes at all.

  
 I'd be willing to bet that there's a way to program a custom mode if I worked
at it long enough.  Right now I don't have the time and I'm just happy to
get the extra keyboard and mouse off the desk.  I also installed Synergy on
both machines so I don't even have to use the button except during startup.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4457735</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 17:47:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4457735</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4457735@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>So you get no video from the NUC on your monitor, or it just can't drive it at the native resolution so it is blurry? Is it a matter of the native resolution being too high for the NUC GPU? <br /><br />I'm assuming built in Intel HD video? </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4457726</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 17:19:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4457726</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4457726@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The problem isn't in the switch.  I discovered that the NUC can't drive my
1920x1200 monitor, at all, even without the switch connected.  I simply hadn't
tried that computer with that monitor before.  It didn't work on Linux or
Windows.  The experience of failing was slightly different on each OS but
it ended up not working on either. 
  
 So I ended up just using it as a keyboard/mouse switch.  Maybe when I have
some time I can play with custom ModeLines on Linux like it's the early 1990's
again.  Windows is a lost cause; it starts up in 800x600, then downloads the
"correct" driver at which point the screen goes completely dark. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4457591</link><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2019 05:48:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4457591</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4457591@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Jun 04 2019 00:39:39 EDT</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Well that was a bit of a failure. <br /><br />So the switch is indeed completely passive -- there is no spoofing of EDID and no other simulation of the presence of KVM on the non-selected computer. <br />As far as the computers are concerned, you're just hotplugging the monitor and keyboard and mouse. <br /><br />This wasn't a problem; both Linux and Windows seem to handle that with little difficulty. <br /><br />But what I discovered was that my personal rig (an older Intel NUC) and my big monitor (native resolution 1920x1200) simply don't get along. I tried it on Linux and Windows, I tried it without the KVM in between, it just wouldn't display at any resolution higher than 800x600. Sooooooo the smaller monitor is back on the desk, and I'm only using the switch for the keyboard and monitor. <br />Feh. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>IOgear<br /><img src="https://scontent.fphx1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/62179841_10157382660684025_5503171433502605312_n.jpg?_nc_cat=107&amp;_nc_oc=AQk0oqCG5hVpCvw0a2kc3e-lfx_D6FtkmfomPd3MkyNXZp0ICsRvF9lprphqhoYUllM&amp;_nc_ht=scontent.fphx1-1.fna&amp;oh=ac5f361e9dca96a567901aa2b29fb2ce&amp;oe=5D9B6321" alt="No photo description available." /><br />Try this one. I've got a Pi, a Surface 3, a G4 Quicksilver and an old Dell GX260 P4 hooked up to it... with a Westinghouse 22" and a Samsung 27"<br /><br />It all works, all the time. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4456380</link><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jun 2019 04:39:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4456380</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4456380@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Well that was a bit of a failure. 
  
 So the switch is indeed completely passive -- there is no spoofing of EDID
and no other simulation of the presence of KVM on the non-selected computer.
 As far as the computers are concerned, you're just hotplugging the monitor
and keyboard and mouse. 
  
 This wasn't a problem; both Linux and Windows seem to handle that with little
difficulty. 
  
 But what I discovered was that my personal rig (an older Intel NUC) and my
big monitor (native resolution 1920x1200) simply don't get along.  I tried
it on Linux and Windows, I tried it without the KVM in between, it just wouldn't
display at any resolution higher than 800x600.  Sooooooo the smaller monitor
is back on the desk, and I'm only using the switch for the keyboard and monitor.
 Feh. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4455183</link><pubDate>Fri, 31 May 2019 06:14:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4455183</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4455183@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I find that the monitors reset sync when I switch between systems. Occasionally I have to hit the monitor select button to get it into the right mode - but I have at least one connected system hooked up HDMI, and at least one hooked up Analog VGA. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4455079</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 22:05:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4455079</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4455079@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Ok, I went ahead and bought the CheapChinese(tm) 2-port switch from eBay.
 It was only about $20 and if it works, it will provide an easy way to switch
HDMI+USB between my personal computer and my work computer.  We'll see how
it goes.  I don't know how smart the switch will be, and whether it will be
disruptive to the computers when switched.  It even comes with an adorable
little remote button that I can put on the desk while the switch itself and
all the cables sit behind the desk. 
  
 What I'm wondering is whether the switch is capable of fooling the non-active
computer into thinking that the monitor is still there, maybe by continuing
to answer EDID requests from both hosts or something like that.  The USB side
I'm less concerned about, since those are designed to be hotplugged all day
long.  I might even put my webcam on the switched side of the bus so I can
use it on either computer. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4454833</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 05:57:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4454833</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4454833@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Mine may be a Belkin. I'll crawl under my desk tomorrow when I'm sober and tell you which one I bought. It wasn't super cheap. I feel like with this kind of thing, going with a known name brand can't hurt. Cheap Chinese shit is *usually* cheap Chinese shit. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4454831</link><pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2019 05:56:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4454831</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4454831@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I use a USB KVM switch. Currently I have a Raspberry Pi, a Surface Pro i7 hooked up to a Surface Pro Dock, an old Dell P4 running Ubuntu with Compiz... and a Mac G4 Quicksilver hooked up to it. There is a little pushbutton switch. I have to hit the mode select on one monitor to scan between Analog and HDMI when I switch... and I have to remember how many times to push the little button to get to the right machine... (I have the machines labeled 1-4 and I just count and eventually you get good at this.) <br /><br />It isn't like a datacenter grade KVM.  You can't hook up a rack full of blade server with 6 blades per chassis, you can't control them remotely or VPN into them from your home office. Adjusting from PS/2 home KVMs to the USB was a little bit of a transition. But... it is cheap and works well. It'll maximize your desk space. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4454422</link><pubDate>Tue, 28 May 2019 21:06:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4454422</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4454422@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I'm thinking about getting an HDMI+USB KVM switch for my desk at home, to
share a single monitor/keyboard/mouse between my personal and work computers.
 Are there any gotchas to watch out for here, or do they work as well as they
used to when everything was VGA+PS2? 
  
 Can I just buy the lowest cost CheapChinese(tm) KVM on eBay and expect it
to work, or are there brands that are particularly good and/or bad?  I suppose
it's worth noting that the output will be converted to DVI to connect to the
monitor, but I don't want to buy a DVI KVM because I want the solution to
outlive this monitor. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4356630</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 13:59:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4356630</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4356630@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Jun 07 2018 04:04:07 PM EDT</span> <span>from Ragnar Danneskjold </span></div>
<div class="message_content"><tt><a href="http://en.getac.com/notebooks/x500-server/features.html" target="webcit01">http://en.getac.com/notebooks/x500-server/features.html</a> </tt><br /> <tt></tt><br /> <tt>I need. </tt><br /> </div>
</blockquote>
<p>Why do you need a portable directory server?  Don't you have a couple of Active Directory machines sitting behind the glass somewhere?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4356571</link><pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2018 09:56:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4356571</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4356571@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Heart defibrillators are awesome toys.  The way you can make someone dance
if you can remote control them provides entertainment second to none. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4356451</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 21:49:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4356451</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4356451@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Is there a difference? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4356433</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:39:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4356433</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4356433@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[That looks like an awesome toy. But is it want or need Ragnar? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4356381</link><pubDate>Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:04:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4356381</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4356381@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[http://en.getac.com/notebooks/x500-server/features.html 
  
 I need. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4355600</link><pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 22:27:13 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4355600</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4355600@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The plethora of retro-style case options available for people to put Raspberry
Pi rigs into suggests that it's a real thing.  One option is to buy an old
broken computer and stuff new guts into it.  But even that's getting expensive,
with broken Apples selling for $100 or more, and old PETs (which would be
ideal) selling for many hundreds of dollars. 
  
 I've got an old Sony monitor in the garage which would have been the *ultimate*
envy of my nerd friends in high school if I had it on my Commodore 64, or
even among those Apple II users who weren't cool enough to have Commodores.
 I really want to hook it up to something.  Does anyone manufacture PCIe CGA
cards? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4355399</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2018 18:24:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4355399</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4355399@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[IG - Make a good console and I bet there would be a business there. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4355384</link><pubDate>Sun, 03 Jun 2018 14:06:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4355384</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4355384@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Are we going to go there?</p>
<p>The whole row ... Print Screen, Scroll Lock, and Pause ... no modern software uses them.  Yes, I know you can hit Scroll Lock to make Excel scroll in a different mode, but I've never seen anyone do that, and I know how to use the "Magic SysRq Key" in Linux, and almost no one uses that either (let's face it: the reason that key combination was chosen is <em>because</em> the key has no other use).  These keys should have been removed along with PF13 through PF24 when the PC keyboard became intended solely for the PC.</p>
<p>They're in an unfortunate place, though: even on a "tenkeyless" (no number pad) layout, the place where those keys go is still there, so there's no point in removing them.  Maybe that's the reason why keyboard manufacturers have persisted in including them.  How about we get rid of those three keys, put the Window and Menu keys there, and make the space bar bigger?</p>
<p>I'm just going to have to buy a bunch of Cherry switches and build my own console.  Yeah you heard me, a console, with a fixed screen, and a non-floating keyboard, and whale skin hubcaps, and all-leather cow interior, and big brown baby seal eyes for headlights...  (Sorry, switched modes there ... my turn to shower *poof*)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4355177</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 22:16:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4355177</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4355177@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>PC computers had a SysRq key, it was shared with the Print Screen key.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4355167</link><pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2018 21:47:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4355167</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4355167@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The one thing Mac got right: it's a key that's used to give commands to the
computer, so call it the "command" key. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4354645</link><pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2018 13:26:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4354645</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4354645@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[If I press a "logo key" I expect the computer to start up a LOGO environment.
 Where's that damn turtle when you need him? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4354548</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 21:00:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4354548</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4354548@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>The "Compose Key", not to be confused with the 'Compost key'.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4354500</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 18:57:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4354500</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4354500@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I have heard 'logo key' as well.  That's probably not a bad name for it,
although I'd prefer 'super', as I'd prefer to not have any homage to Microsoft
involved at all. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4354473</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 16:47:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4354473</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4354473@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Now the hard part is standardizing on a new name for it.  :)   I've heard
it called the "Super key" (an homage to the Space Cadet keyboard), or the
logo key, or the meta key, or (particularly among Mac users) the command key.

  
 Microsoft will probably always call it the Windows key (using phrases such
as "press Win-Shift-S to get a screenshot") and if Microsoft continues to
follow in IBM's footsteps they'll continue to have desktop leverage for about
another 20 years, so it would be difficult to force a renaming of the key.
 However, having noted that the key has become less and less stylized over
the years, as the Windows logo has become less stylized -- note how it was
originally the Nyan Cat logo with the trail behind it, then it was the flag
shaped logo, and now it's the quadrisected trapezoid logo they've been using
since 'doze 8 -- I propose that we call it the "window key" and keyboard
manufacturers should render it as a quadrisected square.  Subtle change, but
one that takes away all vendor specificity, similar to the "menu key" which
appears on the other side of the keyboard. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4354417</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 May 2018 12:31:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4354417</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4354417@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Other OSes have picked up on that modifier key as well, and use it.  It increasingly
makes sense to use a different graphic for that key. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4353898</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2018 14:59:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4353898</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4353898@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I don't know what it feels like, but that's what it's supposed to be like -- tactile bump without much of an audible click.  Here's a two minute video [ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qp46JeDDTCw ] of someone demonstrating each key type.</p>
<p>I like the audible click, but you can get the Das Keyboard with either the brown (tactile non-clicky) or blue (clicky) switches.</p>
<p>If you've already got one model, then you already know the Das Keyboard is an excellent piece of hardware, worthy of being used by an old-school geek raised on IBM keyboards.  Everything about it is good, from the heavy aluminum base, to the built in USB 3 hub, to the big volume knob and <em>minimal</em> media keys.  And although I hate to admit it, I'm getting used to having the extra modifier keys in the bottom row -- but they're marked with the Das Keyboard logo instead of the Windows logo, so that's pretty cool.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><img src="
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4353498</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2018 18:33:55 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4353498</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4353498@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Ah, yes, it is a DAS keyboard... just don't have one at work, so I couldn't
look down to see it. 
  
 I like the feel... if the Cherry MX Brown has that feel without the sound,
I should get one. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4353264</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 18:18:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4353264</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4353264@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 They're a bit different, but I like Dell keyboards for the PC and Apple's
stuff is also nice. Both are a bit softer than other options (such as amazonbasics,
which I'm not such a huge fan of...) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4353236</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 14:37:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4353236</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4353236@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Oddly, I can't remember what I use at home.  I like it, but I wish to 
 
 >have the clickiness without the sound (as weird as that may seem).   
  
 I thought you had a Das Keyboard, like I do?  Those are available with Cherry
MX Brown switches, which are tactile but non-clicky.  (Mine has the Blue switches
which are both tactile and clicky.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4353235</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 May 2018 14:33:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4353235</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4353235@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 After trying out the Romer-G mechanical switches on the Logitech K840 ...
they're nice, not my favorite, but nice.  They are tactile enough for everyday
use.  The tactile response is produced by the keys bottoming out on the anodized
aluminum base.  This makes the response a firm "tap-tap-tap" rather than the
"click-click-click" of Cherry switches, and that may be what some typists
want, particularly those who type with heavy strokes. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4353039</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2018 12:17:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4353039</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4353039@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I didn't know Logitech made such a thing. 
  
 Oddly, I can't remember what I use at home.  I like it, but I wish to have
the clickiness without the sound (as weird as that may seem). 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4352555</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 18:02:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4352555</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4352555@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Logitech is using Romer-G mechanical switches 
  
 I'll bring it over for you to check out IG. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4352552</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 17:49:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4352552</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4352552@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Matias claims they use their own which is a recreation of the classic ALPS
switch. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4352548</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 17:32:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4352548</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4352548@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[What kind of key switches are in the Logitech and the Matias? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4352513</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 15:25:46 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4352513</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4352513@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I've got a Matias Tactile Pro keyboard.  I like it quite a bit. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4352509</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2018 15:08:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4352509</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4352509@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I picked up a logitech mechanical keyboard... I know it's not the best of
them, but the clickiness is making me all sorts of happy. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4331115</link><pubDate>Wed, 24 Jan 2018 20:28:34 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4331115</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4331115@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[There are some decent "keyboard computers" around now, thanks to the emergence
of PC-compatible SoC that actually have decent specs (with the usual disclaimer
that people who do a lot of gaming or video editing are excluded). 
  
 I wonder if there's enough room to put a full computer inside a Model M.
  
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4330824</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jan 2018 19:19:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4330824</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4330824@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I'm still a fan of the Matias Tactile Pro....  I'm running a Unicomp right
now.  It's okay.  Looks like a Model M, but it' definitely doesn't live up
to those old IBM keyboards. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4330053</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 23:54:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4330053</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4330053@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>speaking of cherry hardware....</p>
<p>Have any of us geeks picked up the Cherry Tree Borg Cube VR?</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4330012</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 20:26:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4330012</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4330012@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I have a Unicomp, my model M is still me preferred keyboard, but I'd take
a Unicomp over a cherry anything any day. Buckle spring for life. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4329617</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 22:58:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4329617</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4329617@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Probably.  Most of my M's are in pretty bad shape, though, and I really do
like the MX Blue keys.  They're probably the closest we can get to a true
successor to IBM's buckling springs.   (I've heard the Unicomps are not built
anywhere close to IBM quality.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4329450</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2018 19:27:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4329450</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4329450@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[You should be beaten to death with the Model M. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4329015</link><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2018 18:18:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4329015</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4329015@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > I have gone without my Das Keyboard for months now.  I should buy   
 >another one just for work.   
  
 I'm at the office today (not my home office, the one actually in one of our
buildings) and am typing this message on a genuine IBM Model M keyboard. 
And I'm experiencing something I never thought I'd find: after a year of typing
on my Das Keyboard with Cherry MX Blue switches, the Model M actually feels
a bit mushy. 
  
 I know, I probably lose all sorts of nerd creds for even thinking this. 
But at least I'm not a faux-nerd like Randall Munroe. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4197719</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2017 21:56:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4197719</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4197719@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Funny how you forget these things sometimes, untl you find yourself using
something else. 
  
 I've gotten very accustomed to the back/forward buttons on my Logitech M570
trackball.  Yesterday I sat down at another system and, aside from having
to use a mouse and a crappy chiclet keyboard, I kept reaching for the back/forward
buttons that weren't there.  For an afternoon I had to get reaccustomed to
using Alt + left or right arrow instead. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4160628</link><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:06:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4160628</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4160628@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Gads, that is what I'm missing! 
  
 I have gone without my Das Keyboard for months now.  I should buy another
one just for work. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4153347</link><pubDate>Sun, 25 Dec 2016 14:42:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4153347</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4153347@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, it appears that Satan Claws brought me a Das Keyboard 4 Professional
... (I guess I haven't been naughty enough to get off the good list; must
work on that next year) ... enjoying it so far, it's just as loud as a Model
M but it's a different kind of tactile response.  A bit more delicate.  I
am finding that since the keys don't require as much force to actuate as a
buckling spring, I'm giving it a lighter touch and the keys don't bottom out
quite as much.  These are the Cherry MX Blue switches. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4142368</link><pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2016 13:58:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4142368</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4142368@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 It should be.  And Annie Sprinkle should also be involved. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4140939</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:10:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4140939</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4140939@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Is the American Kennel Club involved? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4140869</link><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2016 17:35:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4140869</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4140869@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Best of breeding needs a market leader. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4139819</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 14:32:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4139819</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4139819@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Very true.  
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4139813</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2016 13:59:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4139813</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4139813@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[s/best of breed/market leader 
  
 Not always the same thing :) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4139177</link><pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2016 03:49:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4139177</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4139177@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Best of breed tends to purposely not talk to each other. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4139010</link><pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2016 12:20:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4139010</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4139010@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ah, yeah, I guess that makes sense somehow, too. If you are able to spend like a pro...</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4138906</link><pubDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 19:24:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4138906</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4138906@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Not disagreeing with any of that, but I was talking about hyperconvergence
in the data center.  Every vendor now wants to sell you a "hyperconverged"
cluster of compute, network, and storage.  In other words, buy it all from
the same vendor because "it's hyperconverged" which is just codespeek for
"we get all ur moneys" 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4138717</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 20:18:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4138717</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4138717@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>There is a bit of truth in there. And I'd say that Apple is rather good at that, but you have to embrace the walled garden.</p>
<p>MS and Google do not cover the whole palette, so it is an unfair comparison. But in the MS world, nothing is ever easy. And in the Google world, your convergence has a shelflife of 2 years, tops.</p>
<p>And in linux, you pay a high fee in the currency of private time to get any convergence at all.</p>
<p>So please, bring this hyperconvergence on! Now!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4138502</link><pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 21:08:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4138502</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4138502@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Thought for the day: 
  
 "Hyperconvergence is all about simplicity" is a vendor's way of saying "just
buy everything from us and there won't be any trouble." 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4137890</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 02:29:02 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4137890</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4137890@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I bought a brother laser/fax/scan 300 sheet capacity printer about 10 years
ago. It runs wired to my network and is still going amazingly well. I don't
need color. This is still a seriously good printer. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4137685</link><pubDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 10:40:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4137685</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4137685@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yep, those JetDirect cards are nice, especially the fact that they are modules.</p>
<p>I got an old Canon printer without network connection a couple of years ago. It is rather a "prosumer" thing, lots of connectivity, like USB, cardslots and IR, but no network. My experience with Canon is, that they are not built to last, but this thing is invincible. I attached it to an AP with a 5m usb cable, so it is WIFI enabled now. It even survived the first AP, an old FritzBox (famous german engineering in da house router brand made by AVM) where it ran rather unstable and was only a generic network printer. We needed to power cycle that one once a month. Now it is an Airport Extreme and it needs powercycling only once a year, also it can be recognized as the real thing and computers use the proper Canon driver.</p>
<p>The thing with printers that are built with WIFI is, that they have some protocol for printing from mobile devices. If you have a linux machine, you could install avahi and get the same benefits, I did that and it works like a charm. You need a CUPS (OSX or Airport Extreme use that too) that has this printer added with the proper driver/ppd. Cups needs to offer the driver via avahi as a normal printer. You browse that info and generate a new avahi service file for that. There is also a python script that does it for you. Look here for an example: http://edoceo.com/howto/cups-airprint</p>
<p>My file is a bare minimum approach, it wasn't working previously with too much info copied from the output of cups:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&lt;?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?&gt;</p>
<p>&lt;!DOCTYPE service-group SYSTEM "avahi-service.dtd"&gt;</p>
<p>&lt;service-group&gt;</p>
<p>  &lt;name replace-wildcards="yes"&gt;AirPrint iP6700D @ %h&lt;/name&gt;</p>
<p>  &lt;service&gt;</p>
<p>    &lt;type&gt;_ipp._tcp&lt;/type&gt;</p>
<p>    &lt;subtype&gt;_universal._sub._ipp._tcp&lt;/subtype&gt;</p>
<p>    &lt;host-name&gt;serverhostname.local&lt;/host-name&gt;</p>
<p>    &lt;port&gt;631&lt;/port&gt;</p>
<p>    &lt;txt-record&gt;rp=printers/Canon_iP6700D&lt;/txt-record&gt;</p>
<p>    &lt;txt-record&gt;note=Canon Pixma iP6700D&lt;/txt-record&gt;</p>
<p>    &lt;txt-record&gt;pdl=application/pdf,image/urf&lt;/txt-record&gt;</p>
<p>    &lt;txt-record&gt;URF=none&lt;/txt-record&gt;</p>
<p>    &lt;txt-record&gt;UUID=8ab3263d-9548-3087-7073-ee2e43627cc8&lt;/txt-record&gt;</p>
<p>    &lt;txt-record&gt;TLS=1.2&lt;/txt-record&gt;</p>
<p>    &lt;txt-record&gt;printer-type=0x901c&lt;/txt-record&gt;</p>
<p>  &lt;/service&gt;</p>
<p>&lt;/service-group&gt;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>PS: It really is annoying that Apple does not just add this by default on the AP!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4137572</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 18:55:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4137572</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4137572@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I hope so, and I expect as much.  I will probably be able to just keep throwing
inexpensive consumables into it forever.  Maybe give it a good blasting with
compressed air every couple of years if it gets dirty inside.  These were
made back when quality meant something in the printer business, back before
they changed the business model to "build the printers as cheap as possible,
then rape the consumer on toner/ink". 
  
 I was even able to score a JetDirect card on eBay for about $15 a couple
of years ago, so it's directly on the network too.  One thing that *is* good
about modern printers compared to older ones is that Ethernet ports are always
included. 
  
 Consumer-grade printers now also have wifi.  I don't like that at all.  Unless
you're planning on having the printer on your lap while you sit on the couch,
run a damn cable to it.  :) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4137561</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:52:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4137561</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4137561@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>If you do not try to print on cardboard, these things will still be printing when the last cockroach on earth died!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4137554</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:14:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4137554</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4137554@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Maybe he has Printer Stockholm Syndrome. 
  
 I'm going to keep my LaserJet 5 running for as long as I possibly can.  That
should be doable because it was built before Carly "Let's Make HP Suck" Fiorina
came in and ruined everything. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4137434</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2016 02:47:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4137434</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4137434@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[One would think you would've learned your lesson after the second one.. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4136605</link><pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:55:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4136605</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4136605@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[HP printers are really going in the toilet.  Last three purchased all had
issues. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4136327</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:29:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4136327</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4136327@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>"H.P. in your Biz"</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4136326</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2016 15:28:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4136326</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4136326@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I guess I wasn't paying attention when HP split itself up into "HP Inc" (personal
computers and printers) and "Hewlett Packard Enterprise" (servers, software,
storage etc) 
  
 "Hewlett Packard Enterprise" is such a 20th century name.  We don't use names
that make sense in this business anymore.  They should change it to something
trendy and brandtastic.  I suggest "Schnooblaxguh" 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4135724</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 15:20:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4135724</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4135724@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Well, they do offer the same keyboard with Cherry MX Brown switches, which
have the same tactile response as the blues but a quieter click.  But if the
objective is to be loud and annoying -- which I endorse wholeheartedly --
then get the blues! 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4135702</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:36:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4135702</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4135702@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 (unlike any of the many other annoying things that haven't quite had that
effect yet). 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4135701</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:35:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4135701</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4135701@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Hm, I should perhaps get one of those Das Keyboards for work. 
  
 Not only does it feel better, but the absurdly loud sounds it generates would
annoy everyone around me at the office enough to encourage them to put me
somewhere far away from them. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4135392</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Nov 2016 14:24:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4135392</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4135392@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[The keyboard I've got my eye on is the Das Keyboard 4 Professional.  It has
Cherry MX Blue switches and seems to be well regarded by the clicky keyboard
using community.  Kind of settling on that one at this point.  I'll still
have my Model M. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4135283</link><pubDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2016 20:28:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4135283</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4135283@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Don't get the Unicomp.  I bought one.  It's okay at best. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4134601</link><pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2016 05:04:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4134601</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4134601@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>If you have gobs of money, you could get a unicomp:</p>
<p>http://www.pckeyboard.com/page/category/Classic</p>
<p>Or just pay a measly $400 for a vintage one:</p>
<p>http://clickykeyboards.com/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4126749</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:40:20 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4126749</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4126749@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[It's nice to hear that mechanical keyboards are increasing in popularity.
 It also says that if I want a Das Keyboard then I'd better get one before
Cherry starts having some of their switches built in communist china to keep
up with demand. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4126746</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2016 16:24:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4126746</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4126746@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[A little article on mechanical keyboards and the lack of swtiches....   
  
 https://www.wired.com/2016/10/race-meet-demand-mechanical-keyboard-makers-swit
ch-things/ 
  
 or  
  
 http://tinyurl.com/jmvlkrf 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4121903</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2016 01:32:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4121903</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4121903@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Found another M in the basement and cleaned it up.  It's at my main workstation
now.  I still may give a modern clicky-keyboard a try though. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4094984</link><pubDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2016 01:42:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4094984</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4094984@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[If he clicks when I jab him with my fingers, he's got the job. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4094593</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 15:38:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4094593</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4094593@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Entertained at the thought of IG finding fleeb under his desk.. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4094091</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 13:33:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4094091</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4094091@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 You need a larger tray. 
  
 I'm a larger Trey, but I won't fit under your desk. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4092554</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2016 01:04:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4092554</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4092554@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 *sigh* 
  
 This crappy non-mechanical keyboard I'm on right now is a distinct non-pleasure
to type on.  But it fits in the tray under my desk, which my M didn't. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4089834</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 20:42:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4089834</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4089834@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Hmm.  That does sound feasible.  The thing is, I removed the keycap and spring,
and if I touch the hammer underneath with the tip of a small screwdriver,
the key registers.  So I might just have to reassemble it properly?  I've
read something about "Sandy's Chopstick Method" which I don't quite understand.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4089827</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2016 19:52:37 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4089827</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4089827@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>If you feel comfortable opening it up, it's likely dust or dirt in between the membrane sheets or a broken/corroded trace... which can be fixed with a trace pen. Model Ms are infinitely repairable.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4089321</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2016 20:26:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4089321</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4089321@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Anyone know how to fix a Model M?  The space bar on my best one stopped registering.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4089146</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 21:19:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4089146</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4089146@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[That's not encouraging.  I bought a Unicomp recently.   
  
  
 I'll go right back to Matias when this one goes. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4089086</link><pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2016 14:17:44 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4089086</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4089086@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I bought a Unicomp when the trackpoint buttons stopped working on my model M. It barely lasted 2 years, and now it randomly decides chunks of the keyboard don't work. Very disappointed.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4088050</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 16:04:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4088050</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4088050@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Yeah.  It's a laptop computer so for now I've moved it (and its docking station) to the middle of the desk and am using its built in keyboard.  I like the extra amount of desk space that is freed up but I'm not sure I can get used to having the big monitor off to one side.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4088026</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:33:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4088026</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4088026@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Thishasn'tbeenagoodweekendforyou.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=4087967</link><pubDate>Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:01:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #4087967</title><guid isPermaLink="false">4087967@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 The space bar on my beloved Model M is no longer working.   :( 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3938986</link><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 21:19:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3938986</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3938986@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I still can't get used to computer parts whose model numbers end in "80" which
are not 8080/Z-80 compatible. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3932285</link><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2015 14:08:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3932285</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3932285@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>getting the A80 running... finally</p>
<p>https://www.arangodb.com/2015/05/merii-hummingbird-a80-optimus-cluster/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3880760</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2015 10:03:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3880760</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3880760@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>otoh programming on it was a mess. it suffered from several bugs caused by not setting defaults like the other ms stuff did. Getting the right screen resolution also a mess. fixing it once it wouldn't boot anymore - also a mess.</p>
<p>No comparison at all to linux, which was designed to be usable without GUI from the very beginning.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3880698</link><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2015 04:22:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3880698</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3880698@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I kinda miss Warp.  The one and only time I used IBM support.  The call lasted about 5 minutes, and most of that was to reset my bios to default so the installer would work.  Once loaded, that was a rock solid OS.  Even ran some simple Win 3.1 stuff under it.  Good for multitasking on what would be considered weak hardware today.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3880164</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:50:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3880164</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3880164@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>This sounds a lot like the choruses of OS/2 users who were trying to get IBM to open source its desktop.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3876968</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 19:37:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3876968</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3876968@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>No arguments there, gets the job done  and is a proper GUI, unlike the dos 3 stuff .  It is lightning quick too and does everything it should. "Clunky" was a wrong word, i should have used, "plain" or "simple" maybe?  Very usable.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3851205</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 05:48:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3851205</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3851205@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Dec 21 2014 05:22:51 PM EST</span><span>from mo </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>btw GEM is released as a GPL application, and is revived for modern computers with variuos versions. OPENGEM is  used as the default GUI for FreeDOS on PC's.</p>
<p>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenGEM</p>
<p>I have used it on freeDOS in the past, and it is a bit clunky by modern standards but does the job.</p>
<p> </p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I have too Mo.  If you find that clunky, try to copy a full disk in Windows (whatever version) to another drive with a simple drag and drop and see what hilarity ensues :-) - compared to the GEM gui.  Just do it could be the motto on the GEM side.  No questions asked.  Kinda like using dd back in the days before you knew dd was a tool.</p>
<p>So many efficiencies in the design.  Kind of like KISS meets Unix philosophy in a GUI sort of way.  Simple, and does one (GUI) task well.  Pretty good for a GUI.  Launch things, and let you browse things.  Kinda all I am looking for in a GUI.</p>
</div>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3851204</link><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2014 05:32:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3851204</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3851204@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sat Dec 20 2014 11:58:25 AM EST</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Hey, you're close anyway ... today's "flat" UI designs look a lot like those of 30 years ago, back when that's all the hardware could handle. <br /><br />(True Real Actual Fact: the Windows 2012 UI was written in Athena Widgets) </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>I would believe it if I tried :-)  I just think they need to hire a &lt; 60 y.o. UI designer to re-write the gui stack in JavaScript to do a better job.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3849067</link><pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2014 22:22:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3849067</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3849067@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>btw GEM is released as a GPL application, and is revived for modern computers with variuos versions. OPENGEM is  used as the default GUI for FreeDOS on PC's.</p>
<p>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenGEM</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I have used it on freeDOS in the past, and it is a bit clunky by modern standards but does the job.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3848241</link><pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2014 16:58:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3848241</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3848241@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Hey, you're close anyway ... today's "flat" UI designs look a lot like those
of 30 years ago, back when that's all the hardware could handle. 
  
 (True Real Actual Fact: the Windows 2012 UI was written in Athena Widgets)

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3847560</link><pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:38:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3847560</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3847560@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I always liked running GEM / DR DOS instead of Win 3 or 3.11 back in the day.  Especially when they added multi-tasking to the mix.  Too bad DR DOS lost the fight.</p>
<p>I would probably use GEM as my day to day window manager in X if someone wrote one.  I suppose I could give Amiwm a spin:</p>
<p>http://umlautllama.com/projects/amiwm/</p>
<p>Close, but not quite.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3847395</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:56:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3847395</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3847395@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ Ah.... 
  
 MDDOS: a hodgepodge arrising out of theft from CP/M and TRS-DOS, with the
disadvantages of both and the advantages of neither. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3847392</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 17:48:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3847392</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3847392@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>yea, used GEM on the XT with Hercules monocrome Amber graphics :-]</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3847377</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 16:23:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3847377</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3847377@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 You mean... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphical_Environment_Manager 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3847185</link><pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:47:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3847185</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3847185@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 CP/M was an impressive OS for its day. 
  
 Today, though, I think people might find it a tad painful.  Although it might
be entertaining to have a kind of CP/M GUI. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3846627</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:50:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3846627</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3846627@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>... btw you do know that CP/M and the whole digital research catalouge of 8bit (16?) is released under an almost BSD type license now right?</p>
<p>CP/M was spun off to a couple of different firms and eventually the CEO of (caldera i think) the compnay who owns it now, posted on one of the biggest CP/M repositories on the net (Gaby Choudry's CP/M site) saying basically they could let people have it.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3846625</link><pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:44:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3846625</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3846625@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>... and msdos/pcdos was cp/m with the "Digital Research" crossed out and "Copyright Microsoft" and "copyright IBM" penciled in (digitally).</p>
<p>There was some stuff in the core msdos code that Gary Kildall challenged Microsoft or anyone else to reveal whats it's purpose was - seeings that he wrote it he was one of the few (or only one) who actually knew what thats code was doing there.</p>
<p>Microsoft/IBM theft of CP/M is one of those things that just beggers belief. Especially as it was what propelled Bill Gates to become the richest man on the planet also. &lt;shakesheadindisbelief&gt;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3794948</link><pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 19:56:21 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3794948</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3794948@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3794392</link><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:27:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3794392</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3794392@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 The myth is that IBM wanted CP/M but Gary Kildall blew them off.  That's
a myth perpetuated by Microsoft's PR people, similar to the myth that Bill
Gates *didn't* say "640 KB ought to be enough for anyone." 
  
 The truth is that Bill Gates' mother had connections inside IBM and gave
them the inside track to land the operating system deal for IBM's new personal
computer. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3793847</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 18:39:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3793847</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3793847@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ I completely agree. 
 CP/M was built on integrity. 
 MS-DOS was built on theft. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3793782</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 14:14:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3793782</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3793782@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 That would be more correct, yes.. and I certainly know why they looked alike.

  
 But I preferred CP/M.  And their business model. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3793778</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 13:58:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3793778</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3793778@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >    
 > But I kinda liked CP/M, even thought it resembled MS-DOS in many   
 >respects (on the surface, at least).   
 >   
 >  
  
 Hmmmm.... considering that CP/M was around for quite a while before MS-DOS
came to be... it was MS-DOS that "resembled" CP/M.  
  
 And there's a reason for that. 
 And Bill Gates will *never* tell you. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3793760</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 12:38:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3793760</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3793760@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Yeah, I never had either the money or the desire to buy CrossDOS for my Amiga.
 I liked it just the way it was.  I could buy my own PC if that's what I wanted.

  
 But I kinda liked CP/M, even thought it resembled MS-DOS in many respects
(on the surface, at least). 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3793689</link><pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2014 05:16:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3793689</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3793689@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Fleeb:</p>
<p>The Amiga (even the lowly A500) had an easy way to deal with that MS(PC) DOS crap back in the day:</p>
<p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CrossDOS</p>
<p>They just needed a way to interpret the data :-)</p>
<p>Of course there is the old tried and true beat your head against the wall method (ala Messy Dos):</p>
<p>https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.sys.amiga.misc/SNAJiehQkS8</p>
<p>Or, just throw money at it:</p>
<p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual_Computers_Catweasel</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3793451</link><pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2014 13:33:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3793451</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3793451@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>replacing the camshaft control of a whasher with an arduino:</p>
<p>http://imgur.com/a/9L0LI/noscript</p>
<p>:]</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3792922</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 21:26:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3792922</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3792922@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I just had flashbacks of when I ran Pseudodel - damn that was a long time
ago. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3792828</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 14:51:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3792828</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3792828@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[LS: 
  
 Gads. 
  
 ax25: 
  
 Commodore had some badass hardware for the day.  But the company itself was
clueless about what they had.  And so, MS-DOS leading to Windows.  Ugh. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3792696</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 02:54:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3792696</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3792696@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Oct 10 2014 07:32:24 PM EDT</span> <span>from IGnatius T Foobar </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Believe it!  The C-128 was a pretty cool machine that didn't get the attention it deserved.  It had a 6502 CPU <strong>and</strong> a Z-80 on board.  Commodore had a build of CP/M that ran on the Z-80 side.  Unfortunately, CP/M was just starting to be supplanted by MS-DOS by that time.</p>
<br /><br /></div>
</blockquote>
<p>Damn, that makes me a Commodore fan after all.  Would have been best of both worlds at the time :-)</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3792687</link><pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 01:24:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3792687</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3792687@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Finally got a backup of the box that is failing. (Yeah, I hadn't backed it
up in 2 years, and I waited until *after* hardware failure had begun...) 
  
 Never had a problem backing it up in the past, but this time I just couldn't
get the process to complete at first. I use an external 1TB USB drive. But
the system wouldn't talk to it, this time; had to look into Event Viewer (the
Windows syslog) before the problem became somewhat clear. 
  
 The backup would abort with "could not find the file specified." Twice or
more in a row. 
 Digging past that, into a log entry from Event Viewer, made it fairly clear
that there was a problem with NTFS security on the backup target. So "could
not find the file specified" was a write error to the backup drive. 
  
 I tried to fix this by editing NTFS permissions, but things were very strange.
The usual feature where you can replace all permissions
on child folders with inheritable permissions, did not work. Other changes
to the volume would not persist across reboot. 
  
 Another log entry from Event Viewer made things clearer. "The system could
not flush the journal, filesystem may be inconsistent", or words to that effect.
Once this event appears in the logs, everything is fucked from that point
onward. Things behave strangely. Writes don't commit across reboots. There
are weird errors. Backups, obviously, fail. 
  
 Mounting and unmounting the USB drive once led to some weirdness: "one of
the USB devices attached to the system has malfunctioned." That's an error
that I only saw for the first time about 3 weeks ago, in relation to a camera
or something that was hooked up through the hub in my monitor. Could be related
to all this early hardware failure shit. 
  
 So I think writes to the drive are failing at the device layer, and
it might be related to the USB bridge chip in the enclosure. Never had a major
problem with USB on this enclosure in the past, but it's always been a bit
of a shitty enclosure. eSATA never worked properly.  
 So I decided to pull the drive out of the enclosure and connect it directly
to the motherboard. 
  
 Easier said than done. The USB enclosure is not obviously user-servicable.
There are no visible screws, only a shiny sticker that says "removing this
will void your warranty." Ok, obviously that's a screw. Off it goes--WARRANTY
VOIDED! Now there is only sticker-residue that says VOID. 
  
 I remove the one screw, and still can't get the enclosure apart. One half
is slidin apart, and the other refuses. I start to suspect the rubber feet.
Poking and prodding, I don't want to remove them, they are glued down. Googling
reveals that there are two screws hidding under the feet, however, so
off they go. Guess I can't stand the enclosure on its side now, unless I go
buy some rubber cement and glue those things back on. 
  
 I've got one cover fully off the enclosure, and this thing is still a piece
of shit. I can't see how to get at all the screws that are holding the drive
into the enclosure without fabricating custom tools. Some are on the side,
with only a half inch of clearance. Others are half hidden under the drive
itself. 
  
  
 Time for the power drill. I drill four, screwdriver-sized holes in the hard
ABS plastic sides of the USB enclosure. I figure OK, now I've got an enclosure
with holes in the sides, but at least I didn't "break" anything, the little
latches that hold it all together are still intact, so I could still probably
get this piece of shit back together if I wanted to keep it, and now it's
got some extra ventilation. 
  
  
   
 Anyway, extracting the
drive from the USB enclosure and connecting it directly to the motherboard
was enough to get stable connectivity to the drive, and get a backup. Parts
for my upgrade build should arrive on Monday or Wednesday, and the next phase
of trying to clone drives to the new RAID array and then yank the motherboard
out from underneath will begin.., 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3791506</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 23:32:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3791506</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3791506@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Believe it!  The C-128 was a pretty cool machine that didn't get the attention it deserved.  It had a 6502 CPU <strong>and</strong> a Z-80 on board.  Commodore had a build of CP/M that ran on the Z-80 side.  Unfortunately, CP/M was just starting to be supplanted by MS-DOS by that time.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3791406</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:07:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3791406</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3791406@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ 
  
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Commodore_128#CP.2FM_mode 
  
 I've done this.  My father had a CP/M machine with several bits of software
that he had picked up one way or another, and I wanted to run some of these
on my own machine. 
  
 Honestly, I wanted to program for CP/M, but never picked up compilers or
the like for it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3791372</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 15:34:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3791372</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3791372@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ I have never, ever, heard not even the slightest hint of CP/M on the '128.
And considering that Brian Reilly (who ran Morningstar Keep Citadel on his
CP/M box back in 1982) was a regular at my ham shack, I do think the topic
would have come up.  
  
 Not saying it could not be done - there is no validity to that phrase, almost
ever - but I've never heard of it actually *being* dome. 
  
 But remembering that I hacked a machine code XMODEM protocol module for the
first BBS I wrote (CommLine 64) and used "patch arounds" to almost completely
ignore the C=64 "kernal" (spelling is correct), and ended up with a protocol
that actually ran slightly *faster* than on the PC-AT boxen, who am I to say
"that couldn't be done"? 
  
 Pretty much - in computers - within reason, if you can think of it you can
do it. 
  
 But with CP/M on a "Commie" box, my question would have to be "why?" since,
even then,
there were much better home boxen on which to do that - the TRS-80 for one,
and the Apple II for another. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3791296</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:39:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3791296</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3791296@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I remember using telnet on my Amiga to do things on the Internet.  No web
browsing at all for me back then.  And I had a blast as well... using elm
or pine or whatever for e-mail, some analogous sort of thing for Usenet discussions
back before all the advertisers completely destroyed it, and acquiring files
via ftp primarily.  I didn't use gopher much, as it never really had much
of interest to me back then. 
  
 I also remember telneting to a public unix account available to anyone at
nyx as long as you could validate your existance.  Not sure that system is
still around anymore (and I can't recall the full DNS for that machine anymore).

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3791294</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:35:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3791294</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3791294@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2014-10-09 18:00 from vince-q   
 > > 2014-10-09 14:28 from fleeb     
 > >      
 > > I thought the C= 128 could run the original Citadel...     
 > >     
 > >    
 >    
 > Nope - it ran that same stupid Commodore BASIC that the C64 used, with
 
 >a few extra commands.   
  
 I distinctly remember running CP/M on my C=128, and running a number of programs
written for that OS on the thing.  It did a reasonably decent job of it as
well.  Although I never had a copy of Citadel to try with it. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790848</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 06:23:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790848</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790848@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ That's now.  
 Of which I wrote was then. 
 And never they twain shall meet. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790847</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 05:53:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790847</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790847@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>You can get an Ethernet card for a C64 for about $50 USD, and an OS with a browser for free these days.  All you need is the C64 :-)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790841</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 04:41:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790841</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790841@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ When the C64 was being sold (roughly 1982-5) there were no web browsers.
There was no web. At least, nothing like what we would even remotely call
the web today. 
  
 You used the unix command line. 
 You used FTP. 
 You used gopher. 
 You used WAIS. 
 And to "visit places" you used telnet or rlogin. 
  
 You had, to a less than minimal degree, know what you were doing. 
  
 The C64 did what it had to do in light of "the things that were available
to do with a home computer." 
  
 There were terminal emulators and modems. Back then you called dialup BBSs.
There were bunches of them. Just about everywhere. And some of those BBSs
managed to connect with each other (today we would just call that 'networking'
with a nonchalant 'ho hum'). People communicated. BBSs actually became communities.
There were offline ("real life") get-togethers. Pizza nights. Saturday lunches.
The yearly OwlBash in New Jersey. And more. 
  
 This is what we gave up in the name of "progress." 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790834</link><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2014 03:57:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790834</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790834@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I would not recommend doing not much more than light web browsing or word processing on the C64 :-)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790774</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 22:00:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790774</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790774@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > 2014-10-09 14:28 from fleeb   
 >    
 > I thought the C= 128 could run the original Citadel...   
 >   
 >  
  
 Nope - it ran that same stupid Commodore BASIC that the C64 used, with a
few extra commands. 
  
 Citadel-128 was nothing more than a port of my Citadel-64 software, with
added support for external hard drives (I ran my BBS w/ a 20 meg hard drive
- there were only 2 C128 BBSs using hard-drives. Me and the other one.). 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790755</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 21:01:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790755</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790755@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I have seen lots of old boxes surviving more than 10 years. Most of the time, the harddisk or power supply become faulty.</p>
<p>But of the failing ones, most died of capacitor issues, between 5 and 10, do not recall exact amount. Two died of dc-to-dc converter overheating (distinctly visible darker area around one of them), one because the PSU connecter burned out on one pin (that one looked like "phew, this could have been worse, like starting a real fire"). Only one died of uncertain cause.</p>
<p>Oh, and I killed some accidentally, because I slipped with a screw driver when I tried to mount an AM2 heatsink for the CPU. Luckily, it was replaced it. Another one had a memory slot which I broke in half while trying to insert a memory module with one hand, while not looking into the case. Actually, it "lived", but I buried it.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790720</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:28:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790720</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790720@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I thought the C= 128 could run the original Citadel... 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790716</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 18:26:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790716</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790716@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ I've only owned two machines (personal use desktop PCs). 
  
 I am *not* counting the absolute ton of machines, routers, hubs, switches
(smart and otherwise), RAS boxes, etc. etc. etc. that were a part of the NetK2NE
ISP operation. Some of that stuff survives to this day in my storage areas
up here on the mountain. Most has since been sold, given to friends, etc.

  
 I am also not counting the TRS-80 Model I (1977) or the Apple II (1978) or
the Commodore 64/128 (1983/1985). They couldn't run anything that we run today
(except for Citadel - I ported that to the Commodore 64 and then to the 128
before "falling into" an IBM PC AT clone in 1987, never looking back and beginning
the Citadel:K2NE project). 
  
 Enough from me! 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790686</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 17:32:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790686</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790686@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Melvin does not wish to upgrade. 
  
 Ever. 
  
 This was true when I last upgraded his machine.  He did not wish to part
with that one, either.  Nor the one before that. 
   
 He has only ever owned three machines.  His current machine has a single
core running at 1 Ghz, back when such things were how CPUs were measured.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790662</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:22:07 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790662</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790662@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I just ordered a stack of Haswell stuff -- almost an entirely new machine,
I expect to re-use the video card, power supply, Blu-Ray, and Windows license;
all the rest might as well be upgraded. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790661</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 16:20:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790661</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790661@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 Yeah, my mom has a Dell from that timeframe -- 2001-2 or so -- that shipped
with Windows XP. I finally had to advise her to retire it because XP was no
longer supported and Vista-or-newer would not be a good tenant on that hardware.
  
  
  
 That thing was a tank - all my other machines since then have failed or needed
upgrading. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790334</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 06:28:18 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790334</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790334@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ The motherboard in my office machine is from 2003. Still running. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3790259</link><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 01:09:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3790259</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3790259@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 Yep, that fix didn't last long.   
  
  
 (boom) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3789776</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 17:00:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3789776</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3789776@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >I do sincerely and ultimately believe in defective capacitors. If  
 >your board is older than 4 years, even significantly older maybe,  
  
 Probably. This board is a P55 so I guess it's from 2009. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3789774</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:55:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3789774</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3789774@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I still think this is probably a hardware issue, otherwise this would be
in Microsoft Bashing). But I'll run with the updated(?) driver for a while
just in case. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3789773</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:54:35 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3789773</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3789773@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 (I use Windows at home, too... although I've been more fortunate, it seems).

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3789770</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 16:49:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3789770</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3789770@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Right. But I depend on Windows to run Lightroom, these days. (No, there is
no open source product that even comes remotely close to replacing Lightroom.)

  
 And the occasional game. 
  
 Anyway, this is weird: 
 (1) Windows generates a Minidump on BSOD, by default. 
 (2) I see a minidump in C:\Windows\Minidump or wherever, from early September-ish,
before this problem began happening in earnest. 
 (3) But now the system is configured for a full crash dump (C: 
 \Windows\Memory.dmp I believe). The weird part is that I didn't change the
configuration since September, for sure. And probably not ever. 
 (4) The full memory dumps were failing to appear, so I switched it back to
generate Minidumps. And finally got one. It fingered the Intel Matrix Storage
driver, so I updated that. We'll see if that helps. 
  
 I ran Microsoft's memory checker in extended mode overnight, and it says
"no problemo, boss." 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3789499</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 12:42:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3789499</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3789499@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > I've got a flakey Windows box. Pretty sure this is screwed up at the  

  
  
 This is, of course, by definition. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3789275</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 09:00:59 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3789275</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3789275@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I do not believe in memcheck. In the last 10 years, no box ever failed because of failing memories. I saw defective memory chips simply being ignored by the system, but no harm done. Defective memory being harmful to a machine is from the pre-DDR1 time, in my opinion.</p>
<p>I do sincerely and ultimately believe in defective capacitors. If your board is older than 4 years, even significantly older maybe, have a look at the capacitors. If any of them has a swollen top, it is likely that the machine will continue to fail. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capacitor_plague some sample images included. Most often they are between the cpu socket and the back panel. They die because they are either badly manufactured and/or because heat dries out the electrolytes.</p>
<p>Symptoms are:</p>
<ul>
<li>Waking from suspending to ram/hibernation fails</li>
<li>USB ports do not give enough power to attached devices</li>
<li>Other effects in scenarios where more power than usually is required</li>
</ul>
<p>The simple reason is, that the capacitors play a major role in delivering the required voltages and amperes for operation. My previous desktop board failed to resume from sleep, the attached 5port switch which was powered over ps2 port failed to operate. This board now serves as my home server without any problem, I do not need to power usb/ps2 devices and it is always on. It might one day stop booting at all, but currently it is fine. Some of the capacitors showed swollen tops, btw.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3789204</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2014 05:14:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3789204</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3789204@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ 1. download, then burn, a Linux Live CD. 
 2. set your BIOS to boot from your CD drive. 
 3. insert the Linux Live CD. 
 4. tell WinBlowz to shutdown/restart 
  
 Your box will boot up using the Linux Live CD, which will NOT do ANYTHING
to your existing hard disk(s). 
  
 Let the machine run. Use the hell out of Linux - there's a web browser and
a few other fun toys. See if the box frotzes on you. If it runs for more than
a day, the problem is in your WinBlowz installation (probably a bad driver
or 3... oh, sorry, Mickey$lop calls them "dll files" - same diff). 
  
 If the machine frotzes under Linux, and assuming you ran the mem-check and
the RAM tested good, then it's either the BIOS corrupted or the CPU or the
motherboard itself. Same fix in any of those cases - replace the motherboard
and CPU. About $150 for something decent (but not high-end). 
  
 Either way, at least you'll have some fun with Linux!! 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3788729</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:19:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3788729</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3788729@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 (This thing ran fine for years with the BIOS that's in there.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3788728</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 23:19:11 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3788728</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3788728@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 I'm a bit worried that reflashing a bios on already flakey hardware could
turn a semi-functioning machine into a dead pile of circuitry if the process
is interrupted.   
  
  
 Good point about the memory checker, though. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3788724</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 22:39:36 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3788724</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3788724@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ Try re-flashing the BIOS. 
 If that doesn't cure it, run a good memory checker. 
  
 In fact, run the mem-check first. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3788708</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2014 21:05:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3788708</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3788708@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I've got a flakey Windows box. Pretty sure this is screwed up at the hardware
level: I get intermittent but frequent BSOD's after waking from S3 suspend,
and now I've seen an instance where it came up and couldn't find the boot
media the first time, but then found it after a soft reboot. 
  
 So with that second piece of information, it seems definitely hardware. But
the most likely culprit? Motherboard or hard drive? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3744528</link><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2014 04:35:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3744528</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3744528@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Ah, I remember the paper route.  It was only 1 day a week for the first one I had (mostly advertisements).  Made $7 every 2 weeks for 350 papers delivered to a section of town with few apartments.  What fun.  Probably was o.k. money for 1978 or so, but sucked in the winter.  A sled was not quite as easy to control as a wagon with that many papers.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3733730</link><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2014 17:22:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3733730</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3733730@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I had 2 paper rounds when i was a kid. SUndays we were like pack mules :) - all those magazines and suppliments - &lt;shudder&gt; .</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3732341</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 10:58:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3732341</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3732341@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I used to babysit. <span id="c7a0d0e2-f799-486d-944e-469780a44926" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">until</span> I had my own kids. Then I <span id="548cc321-66b7-4cfd-bbd6-f6c6d4929444" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">was</span> just a mother.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3732288</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2014 05:13:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3732288</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3732288@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ Heh - and we also earned money shoveling snow! 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3731523</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2014 19:44:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3731523</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3731523@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Back when I was a teenager we earned money mowing lawns!  (Ok, when I say
"we" I meant "other kids."  I was about 13 when I started doing computer work
for money.) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3719831</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 22:13:45 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3719831</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3719831@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I still think the "mouse whipping" was the best idea! :) </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3719824</link><pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2014 21:24:47 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3719824</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3719824@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed May 21 2014 04:42:01 PM EDT</span> <span>from Spiral Architect </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Bribery wouldn't hurt, either. The kid has to somehow have a reason. If the curiosity isn't there, you need another incentive. Left to herself, my kid would spend the whole day playing Minecraft or watching Dr Who. This summer, a programming lesson might become part of her daily chores. Probably <br /><br /><br /><br /></div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>So there is more than one with that strange compulsion.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3719543</link><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2014 21:50:09 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3719543</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3719543@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p><span id="e2817321-c1cf-416d-9fa0-f0242f0fc3a9" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">do</span> you want to go with hardware or software? <br />Software-wise, get him to start with building a <span id="723ad326-975b-4b06-b350-968ed14cd399" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">wordpress</span> website.<br />Assign him to do a re-design for your company (assuming you already have a website)</p>
<p><span id="c536f50b-9a85-4a9e-954e-6b3db5eebc14" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">Website</span> building is relatively easy and highly desirable right now. <br /><br />If you want to go with hardware, get him an <span id="83fb282d-5618-47b2-9d51-662b5b4652ec" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">ipod</span> touch with a broken screen and a replacement screen on ebay, and let him have at it (assume it will take 4-5 tries before he gets it to work, but those things can be bought fairly inexpensively.) I know a 15-year-<span id="f06d8500-7b34-4611-9344-81208160e590" class="GINGER_SOFTWARE_mark">od</span> who already makes money changing screens on phones and such.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3715887</link><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2014 13:56:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3715887</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3715887@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > The older machines, compared to today's machines, appear clunky and   
 >don't have teh really rad cool games on them.  I would expect a child  

 >would find them annoying, and wouldn't bother with them.   
  
 During the 8-bit generation there wasn't much to *do* with a home computer
other than just play some simple video games and learn programming languages.
 Of course, it could be argued that many of the people who have computers
today, and don't know much about how they work, wouldn't own them otherwise.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3715419</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 20:48:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3715419</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3715419@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Here is a suggestion: a book that might get someone, young or old, interested in programming-- the way BASIC did for a generation before:</p>
<p>http://inventwithpython.com/</p>
<p>see the link to the pdf and source for the first book it's all licensed under creative commons, and you can get a hard copy on Amazon (btw checkout the reviews :) ).</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3715411</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 20:13:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3715411</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3715411@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>http://www.astromik.org/raspi/raspi1.jpg</p>
<p><img src="http://www.astromik.org/raspi/raspi1.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p>thats the raspi. it comes at $30 price tag. Add a Keyboard, an SD-Card for the OS, and for ~50$ you've got something which will bring current TVs to life.</p>
<p>http://exp-tech.de/ and http://www.watterott.com/ are distributors of those, which offer all pleatora of kits like robots, quadcopters, etc. (ok its german, but you'll get the product names to find s.b. near you selling them)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3715127</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 12:45:05 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3715127</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3715127@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I completely agree... but the operative word is 'appear', when applied to
making such hardware available to someone who is young and doesn't necessarily
know any better. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3715108</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2014 11:18:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3715108</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3715108@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > May 21 2014 5:24pm from fleeb   
 >    
 > I dunno.   
 >    
 > The older machines, compared to today's machines, appear clunky and   
  
 I wrote a machine-language Xmodem protocol file transfer routine for the
COMMODORE 64 that outran FTP on an IBM PC compatible using an 80386 processor
back in (roughly) 1988 just to prove "it can be done." 
  
 Moral: there really is no such thing as garbage hardware. Just figure out
a new use, or make a better way of doing the "old" stuff. 
  
 After all, today's leading edge smartphone has more computing power than
the Command Module of the Apollo 11 mission. 
  
 Now, knowing that, send your smartphone to the moon and have it come back
to Earth again, land safely, and still be operational. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714994</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 21:24:23 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714994</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714994@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I dunno. 
  
 The older machines, compared to today's machines, appear clunky and don't
have teh really rad cool games on them.  I would expect a child would find
them annoying, and wouldn't bother with them. 
  
 But it's true, they had languages built into them, and a manually to encourage
learning.  Today, we expect to actually use a computer to get work done (or
to goof off), rather than program them. 
  
 Not sure how to bridge that gap. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714993</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 21:17:10 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714993</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714993@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Hm, back in our youth, the computers came with a programming language preinstalled, mostly a flavor of Basic. There was even a manual for it, included with my Amiga 500. There were also other childfriendliy programming languages, like Logo, Comal, Turbo Pascal. Something were you didn't have to invoke arcane nonse just to print Hello World like in Java today.</p>
<p>http://www.josvisser.nl/opencomal/ http://gambas.sourceforge.net/en/main.html http://lazarus.freepascal.org</p>
<p>in general: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_educational_programming_languages#Languages_by_age_and_experience</p>
<p>Give him an older machine, install some Linux, there are even educational/child specific distributions. Let him play games. Games are great, they motivate you to find ways to cheat in them. Which eventually leads to hacking. This is a mindset/believesystem that needs to be acquired and is probably best enforced by curiosity.</p>
<p>Games also improve cognitive functions, like hand/eye coordination, reaction time, orientation, tolerance to frustration, maybe even puzzle solving. My 4.5 year old son spends way more time in front of screens than he should (by standards of child doctors, etc.), but you should see him solve puzzles in Cut the Rope, Bad Piggies and some other games were you need to solve puzzles. Currently he loves Skylanders, there are some puzzles were you need to rotate a maze in order to move a tiny goblin through it. He solves almost all of them with ease. The ones he does not solve are sometimes challenging for me, too.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714991</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 20:58:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714991</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714991@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 No catholic past. 
  
 I do have an evil stepmother in my past, though. 
  
 I wish I had something more substantive and realistic to suggest to help,
though. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714982</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 20:42:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714982</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714982@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ Bribery wouldn't hurt, either.  The kid has to somehow have a reason.  If
the curiosity isn't there, you need another incentive.  Left to herself, my
kid would spend the whole day playing Minecraft or watching Dr Who.  This
summer, a programming lesson might become part of her daily chores.  Probably
     
    
  
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714969</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 19:37:43 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714969</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714969@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > May 21 2014 9:15am from fleeb   
 >    
 > Mouse-whip 'im.   
 >    
 > Grab the USB end of the mouse and beat him until he submits to using  

 >computers.  
 > It's the only wayl.   
 >   
 >  
  
 ... or maybe you *did* have Nuns in your educational past.... <very evil
grin!> 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714968</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 19:36:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714968</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714968@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > May 20 2014 11:59am from fleeb   
 >    
 > You should physically throw the computers at him, with the hopes that 
 
 >some of the digital bits fly into his head and stay there.   
 >    
 > I suppose, for full disclosure, I should point out that such a   
 >technique ws not used on me.   
 >    
  
 ... which is proof positive that you never attended "Catholic School with
the Nuns" where such tactics would be considered routine. <evil grin> 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714950</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 18:15:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714950</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714950@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[He's 12. So there's the gentle hinting way, and the rough violent way. Or
I could do both, randomly. I love that idea of leaving musical instruments
around, but then how did that family stop the kids from breaking the instruments?
Maybe something that isn't easioy broken, like a harmonica. I imagine my 3
year old will submerge it in water or bury it in dirt. Can it survive that?
 
 But I digress. I want to try to leave around computer parts, eh? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714867</link><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2014 13:15:00 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714867</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714867@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Mouse-whip 'im. 
  
 Grab the USB end of the mouse and beat him until he submits to using computers.
 It's the only wayl. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714761</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 21:49:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714761</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714761@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I read once; a musician and his wife , also an artist-- dearly wanted their children to learn the joys of making music. So! They strategically positioned instruments in various rooms of their house (not sure if they varied the selection now and then, by introducing new ones, but that would be cool?). The children did indeed grow up to become musicians themselves so the gentle touch worked here. B)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Not all children are interested in computers, i wasn't. And untill they become interested, maybe it would be better to try the gentle (underhand?) touch like the family of musicians.  I always wanted to know the name of stuff, or what it did, where it fit in.  And if you leaft computer parts, or even passive -electronics components lying about (like Hansel and Gretle but with resistors and capacitors and the odd IC -nmaybe leading to your (spare?) PC? :D</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714719</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 18:51:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714719</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714719@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[How old?  I gave my kid SnapCircuits to teach her about electroics.  She's
shown a minor interest and aptitude for programming.  Nothing on the level
that I was doing at her age. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714702</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 17:08:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714702</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714702@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>give him a raspi, and if that doesn't help set targets with rewards.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714689</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 15:59:41 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714689</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714689@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 You should physically throw the computers at him, with the hopes that some
of the digital bits fly into his head and stay there. 
  
 I suppose, for full disclosure, I should point out that such a technique
ws not used on me. 
  
 Oddly, laziness can be a useful trait for a programmer.  You push the machine
to do things for you rather than doing things yourself... the hallmark of
a programmer, heh.  But, it isn't for everyone. 
  
 I wouldn't force it, or much of anything else.  I think you have to really
enjoy this stuff to succeed at it.  If he takes an interest in puzzles, computers
offer endless puzzles to solve that lead to useful things for others.  Otherwise,
he'd just find them annoying. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3714646</link><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2014 15:46:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3714646</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3714646@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Supposing I have a smart son who is also lazy. Supposing I wanted to make
him learn something about computers so he can have a skill that is useful.
Any recomendations where to start? Should I have him take apart old computers?
 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3712852</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2014 06:19:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3712852</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3712852@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>**Takes off hat** You have my condolences.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3712811</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 22:48:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3712811</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3712811@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>At least I know she's in a better place... (actually, I'm not sure the dining room table is any better than my desk...hmmmn)</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3712802</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 21:39:33 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3712802</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3712802@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3712787</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 21:11:32 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3712787</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3712787@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Heh... that's a good name for it! 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3712783</link><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2014 21:00:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3712783</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3712783@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>My 5-year-old Dell laptop died yesterday. I'm seriously in mourning. </p>
<p>We ordered a new desktop today, but I'm going to miss her.</p>
<p>RIP Dellilah.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3707051</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2014 15:02:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Re: Rasp Pi BBS ++</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3707051@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun May 04 2014 08:46:12 EDT</span><span>from mo </span><span class="message_subject">Subject: Rasp Pi BBS ++</span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<p><span style="background-color: transparent;">This is the front page, but its  just a bit of info, you have to SSH or telnet into the BBS (SSH is the prefered option for all):</span></p>
<p><a href="http://mono.org/" target="webcit01">http://mono.org/           </a> and      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monochrome_BBS</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<p>Sounds interesting.</p>
</div>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_content">
<p>I'm considering getting a Raspberry Pi to run a mail server, and a BBS, the above "mconv/mbbs" (maybe even a gopher server ),</p>
<p>I'll of course try and run citadel on the Pi :) but i'm just gonna start with a simple pop3 server probably.</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>There are people successfully running citadel on a Pi, afaik. And you probably wont find a simpler pop3 server than citadel in terms of installation easiness.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3707025</link><pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2014 12:46:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Rasp Pi BBS ++</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3707025@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>I just read "menus" and "citadel" . Can the text client use menus? Here in the UK (well on a server somewhere in NYC now actually :) ), there is a long established BBS, that started in the very early 90's: monochrome BBS. My ideal BBS, would be modern citadel functionality with a monochrome BBS user interface. This is from someone brand new to BBS's but i have looked at many.  This citadel is unique! (as is the monocrome BBS i think - but that is strictly a BBS still )</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This is the front page, but its  just a bit of info, you have to SSH or telnet into the BBS (SSH is the prefered option for all):</p>
<p>http://mono.org/            and      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monochrome_BBS</p>
<p>There is also a clone of that BBS software on sourceforge, written by an ex-BBS member and tested by a few of the BBS members at the time.</p>
<p>http://mconv.sourceforge.net/      - a bit old (there is a security patch from the author, if anyone wanted to run this as a public BBS)</p>
<p>I have had a look at a few other citadel BBS's  - incl the home of Daves Own Citadel (DOC).</p>
<p>If you have never heard of it though, i think you might be interested, it's very much still a living community been going about 20 years.</p>
<p>shh mono@mono.org </p>
<p> </p>
<p>I'm considering getting a Raspberry Pi to run a mail server, and a BBS, the above "mconv/mbbs" (maybe even a gopher server ),</p>
<p>I'll of course try and run citadel on the Pi :) but i'm just gonna start with a simple pop3 server probably.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3689635</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 07:13:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3689635</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3689635@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ No menus (unless you want them). 
 No extraneous nonsense (unless you want it). 
 That, for me at least, has always been the "something special" about Citadel.

  
 In the "old days" we (the "back east 'we'") used to say that Citadel did
best what a BBS should - "get out of the way and let the user read and post
**messages**" - which is, to my way of thinking, the primary task of a good
BBS. 
  
 Now if only FreakDog can get his DogpoundII up and stable - for the past
day or so it has been down more than up and that keeps Cascade Lodge off-net.

  
 That will work itself out -- he's probably preoccupied with basketball...
;) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3689264</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Mar 2014 03:11:50 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3689264</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3689264@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Thanks :) 
  
 And all because the hardware just happened to land in my lap at the right
time.  It baffled me to see the contortions people went through to make multiuser
work on DOS, when even the most primitive Unix gave you multiuser, session
control, and modem handling as included services.  All you had to do was write
the application code and the OS took care of everything else. 
  
 However I also had the luxury of a later start.  Since I never ran on anything
with less than 512 KB of memory and 10 MB of disk, I didn't have to do a lot
of the silly bit-banging that the CP/M version needed to run in 64 KB of memory
and <1 MB of disk. 
  
 Even I am surprised at the interest Citadel attracts today, particularly
when I have neglected it over the last year and a half (due in part to a situation
at work which is, thankfully, starting to go away).  There is something distinctly
unique about it, and enough people seem to understand that there's something
special here. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3689047</link><pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2014 17:58:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3689047</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3689047@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[    
 IG -- I really think that if you had the source to Citadel:K2NE you would
have ended up doing the rewrite anyway.   
    
 The problem is that all the ancient (trans: single-user) Citadel variants
were extremely "linear" and did not (mainly because, at that time and with
the resources at hand for most of us) even begin to consider "unix-isms" that
make multi-user code writing much, well, not "easier" but much more "sensible."
  
    
 It was just absolutely out of the question to adopt a philosophy of "let
the operating system handle it" when the "operating system" was DOS, or even
CP/M.   
    
 I actually had a multi-user implementation of CitK2NE running for about a
year - using Norton Desktop for Windows. I had to write the file-locking code
myself (no such thing in DOS - after all, there's only one user, right?) and
it was - to say the least - ***not*** elegant code. But it worked.
Sort of. But we were talking "dialup modem access" and not TCP/IP, and compared
to what we do now, the "speeds" were abysmally slow.   
    
 What you've done, IG, is absolutely the best way to have gone. Legacy code
should, most of the time, be left in the museum.   
    
 You've made a Citadel which looks and works like "the old ones" (using the
text client) and has a bunch of nifty newer features through the web interface.
All of it good. It appeals to the broad "user-space" out there and after all
these years still attracts interest and attention from folks that never heard
of Citadel before "now" and that, in itself, says it all.   
    
 Good job!   
  
 --Vince (K2NE) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3688149</link><pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2014 11:30:17 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3688149</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3688149@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Wow, I'll bet that if I had seen the code for Citadel-K2NE, I could have ported
it to Unix instead of having to do a complete rewrite after reading unmaintainable
spaghetti that was Citadel-86. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3679788</link><pubDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2014 12:22:31 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3679788</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3679788@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I seem to remember telling several C-Net BBS Sysops to get a friggen SFD already

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3679661</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 20:14:56 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3679661</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3679661@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 My "favorite thing to do that anooyed just about everyone not running C64/128
hardware" was to make the stuff do things that the "IBM compatible" crowd
swore was not possible. 
  
 As in.... 
  
 1. writing an FTP file-handler in machine code, bypassing all the nonsense
over-checking in the C64 "kernal" (their spelling, not mine) and ending up
with something that would move files (using a then-speedy 2400 baud modem)
faster than an IBM PC AT talking to another AT machine. This REALLY irked
Irving the Duck beyond words! <evil grin> 
  
 2. getting a 20 meg hard drive (fairly big deal in 1985) and then getting
it running on a C64 (an even bigger fairly big deal in 1985). Which led to...

  
 3. writing a Citadel BBS "look alike" to run on that hardware. 
  
 Now if THAT didn't piss off "Hue Jr" then I don't know what could... <another
evil grin> 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3679659</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 19:55:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3679659</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3679659@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I knew a smug Amiga user and he turned me off from Amiga products.  Guy turned into a militant vegetarian 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3679621</link><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2014 14:33:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3679621</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3679621@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I still recall how many Amiga owners had a fairly smug attitude, too, until
Medhi Ali destroyed CBM.\ 
  
 The difference, of course, is that the Amiga was truly an amazing bit of
machinery for the day. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3678540</link><pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2014 15:37:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3678540</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3678540@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[I spent most of those years tinkering with a Commodore 64, and yes, the Apple
users had an unearned smug superiority (hmm, it might be argued that they
still do). 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3676728</link><pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2014 03:05:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3676728</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3676728@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Mar 11 2014 10:29:06 PM EDT</span> <span>from Sig </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">Didn't most of the people in the zx81 markets not have access to things like Commodores and Apples? </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>People with Apples did not tend to rub elbows with the TS-1000 or ZX81 crowd.  The price point was quite different ($1100 - $1200) compared to the $35 I spent on my from the Montgomery Wards catalog store.</p>
<p>I did get to mess around briefly with some Apple II and II+ in high school, but it was not as much freedom as I had with the TS-1000.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3675901</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 20:24:49 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3675901</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3675901@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 It's really, really awkward to impossible depending on the game. 
  
 With Champions, impossible. 
  
 With Neverwinter, you can play, but it's a tad awkward.  I wonder if, after
a while, I'd get good with it ... but at the moment, my character looks like
an idiot while all hell breaks loose around him. 
  
 Minecraft feels very weird... maybe I'd get use to it.  But, it otherwise
seems doable. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3675584</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 17:19:42 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3675584</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3675584@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[One wonders how that works with gaming? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3675417</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 16:35:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3675417</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3675417@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I suppose this goes under Hardware... 
  
 I bought an evoMouse, with the hopes that a more ergonomic mouse would help
my hands feel a little better in the long run. 
  
 It acts like a trackpad... more specifically, like one of the newer kinds
of trackpads that knows a few gestures for some simple things (like back,
click, click-and-hold, right-click). 
  
 I will need to grow accustomed to it for full-blown use, but it works pretty
well for normal desktop use.  I have only a little lack of comfort using it
after a few hours, and then only when I need to do something quickly and I
haven't quite remembered the right gesture or something. 
  
 But, overall, it seems to work okay.  Maybe a tad slower, perhaps... not
sure. 
  
 Anyone else fool with this? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3674960</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2014 02:29:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3674960</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3674960@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Didn't most of the people in the zx81 markets not have access to things like
Commodores and Apples? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3674938</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 22:02:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3674938</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3674938@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Simplicity at the core.  Where else would you be convinced to put an off station AM radio next to your computer to press keys on the membrane keyboard to make the processor (in "fast" mode), select loops to generate RF that made tones on the radio.  The rest of you bastards had a speaker and some sort of tone generator :-)</p>
<p>Just too much fun making it do things it was never meant to do (and folks still doing it).  Suppose it is like the strange folks that make new 2600 games.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3670134</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2014 14:36:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3670134</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3670134@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[What's the attraction to ZX81 that people still love it decades later, over
and above all of the other 8-bit computers that are long forgotten?  Is it
the simplicity?  Hackability?  Is it somehow "more retro" than a Commodore
or Apple? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3667917</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 04:43:06 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3667917</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3667917@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>SuperUK for sure.  Not that Germany does not pay its dues:</p>
<p>http://www.zx81.de/</p>
<p>Would love to go to the zx81 club on the annual meeting, but I could not afford it.  I still enjoy looking on from afar, and love that so many folks still love the zx81 line (TS-1000 myself), that it continues today!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3667843</link><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2014 09:08:39 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3667843</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3667843@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>Edeka for shure!</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3667815</link><pubDate>Sat, 01 Mar 2014 23:30:51 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3667815</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3667815@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[No ... SuperGeil.  Where you can buy any flavor of Pi(e). 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3661536</link><pubDate>Mon, 24 Feb 2014 01:31:01 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3661536</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3661536@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 SuperPi? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3661194</link><pubDate>Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:29:08 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3661194</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3661194@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[A raspberry pi super computer.
http://www.southampton.ac.uk/~sjc/raspberrypi/

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3637889</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2014 19:57:12 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3637889</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3637889@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Cool.  I think we'll see a lot of things like that.  Linux on ARM on a lot
of machines. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3637875</link><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2014 17:56:14 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3637875</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3637875@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>http://hackaday.com/2014/01/12/bunnies-open-source-laptop-is-ready-for-production/</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3568485</link><pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 18:15:52 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3568485</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3568485@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Not line voltage but frequency.    
  
 Right.  The AC frequency, not the voltage level.  That would certainly make
for interesting timing. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3566132</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 16:24:58 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3566132</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3566132@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Nope; I don't do the "off the grid" thing. 
   
 After running the numbers I determined my "break even" point to be roughly
22 years in the future, at which point I will either be dead or too old to
give a shit. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3564740</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 03:39:16 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3564740</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3564740@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Tue Oct 15 2013 09:11:29 PM EDT</span> <span>from vince-q </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote><br /><br />In some countries, the line voltage varies frequently. </blockquote>
<br />Particularly in the country known as California.... </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>Don't you just generate it yourself and sell back to the grid (ala the CA way?)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3564717</link><pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 01:11:29 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3564717</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3564717@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >   
 >  
 >In some countries, the line voltage varies frequently.  
  
 Particularly in the country known as California.... 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3563486</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 12:10:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3563486</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3563486@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Sun Oct 13 2013 11:08:24 AM EDT</span> <span>from vince-q </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY">
<blockquote>Oct 11 2013 7:33am from IGnatius T Foobar <br />AC powered clocks, until recently, were almost always timed by the line </blockquote>
<br />
<blockquote>voltage. </blockquote>
<br />Ummmmmm.... no. <br />Not line voltage but frequency. <br /><br />--K2NE </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>In some countries, the line voltage varies frequently.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3563202</link><pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 15:08:24 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3563202</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3563202@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ > Oct 11 2013 7:33am from IGnatius T Foobar   
 >AC powered clocks, until recently, were almost always timed by the line
 
 >voltage.  
  
 Ummmmmm.... no. 
 Not line voltage but frequency.  
  
 --K2NE 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3562615</link><pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 04:58:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3562615</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3562615@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Fri Oct 11 2013 06:23:27 PM EDT</span> <span>from zooer </span></div>
<div class="message_content"><tt>It ran so fast it hertz.</tt><br /> </div>
</blockquote>
<p>Quite the mix of genres there zooer.  Well played.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3562582</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 22:23:27 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3562582</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3562582@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3562574</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 21:10:26 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3562574</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3562574@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 That's probably wise, if someone wants to sell both in the US and Japan.

  
 Amusingly, I found my Amiga 500 (which I bought and ran in Japan) never quite
worked correctly in the United States... its time always ran crazy-fast, as
I guess the machine never quite figured out that it wasn't in Japan anymore.

]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3562531</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 11:33:22 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3562531</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3562531@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[AC powered clocks, until recently, were almost always timed by the line voltage.
 Nowadays, not so much ... the one in my bedroom has a DC power brick, so
it must have its own internal clock source. 
  
 (It also has a WWVB receiver, which definitely won't work in Japan, but I
don't plan to go there anyway...) 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3562483</link><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 05:18:19 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3562483</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3562483@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Thu Oct 10 2013 06:53:30 PM EDT</span> <span>from fleeb </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />Japan uses about the same voltage as the US, but a 50Hz frequency instead of 60Hz. Consequently, you have to purchase clocks in Japan rather than bring your own to the country, or they'll be slow. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>My generator for the radar I ran in South Korea ran at 400 Hz 110 VAC.  Most things worked (some worked so well, they burned up).  Anything with a small transformer seemed not to saturate, but the coffee pots and such...  They boiled only a couple of times before burning up.</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3562427</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 22:53:30 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3562427</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3562427@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Japan uses about the same voltage as the US, but a 50Hz frequency instead
of 60Hz.  Consequently, you have to purchase clocks in Japan rather than bring
your own to the country, or they'll be slow. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3562400</link><pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 18:38:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3562400</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3562400@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Actually it's 100-240.  100 volts is common in Japan. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3549151</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:05:54 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3549151</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3549151@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>You should see how those ceiling fans spin...<br />But seriously, most computer equipment is designed to work 110/220<br /> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3548972</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:32:48 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3548972</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3548972@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Perhaps very briefly... 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3548795</link><pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 11:45:28 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3548795</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3548795@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Some equipment is more expensive in Israel, but your mains voltage is twice
what ours is, so whatever you buy ought to run twice as fast.  Because that's
the way it works.  Right? 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3546564</link><pubDate>Sat, 28 Sep 2013 17:48:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3546564</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3546564@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>1. I'm a she.<br />2. I'm buying in Israel, where some equipment is more expensive.<br />3. I'm playing with ideas, b/c I can probably get an unused computer from a family member. I just liked this concept.</p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3545745</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 14:11:25 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3545745</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3545745@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[ >  
 >well, It may be hard to hit a $35 price tag with that (like with a  
 >PI)   
 >  
 >and it will even be harder to follow up on the low TCO in terms of  
 >energy use of the pi...  
 >  
  
 Well, he said $45 and not $35, and he also said "and an external hard disk"
with no capacity specified which, today, can be anywhere from $70 to $300
(USD). 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3545709</link><pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 11:01:38 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3545709</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3545709@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p> </p>
<blockquote>
<div class="message_header"><span>Wed Sep 25 2013 09:53:40 EDT</span> <span>from vince-q </span></div>
<div class="message_content">
<div class="fmout-JUSTIFY"><br />Suggestion <br /><br />1. buy one of those elcheapo computer cases w/ power supply. <br />2. buy cheapest motherboard/processor you can find and put 1G of RAM into it. <br />3. Buy a 16G flash drive. Install the Linux Version Of Choice onto the flash drive which you will -- in the process -- make ***bootable***. <br />4. Write a custom web page containing all the links that your kids use. <br />5. Configure your favorite window manager (on the flash drive) automatically start IceWeasel and use the custom web page as the home/start page. <br />6. Teach the kids how to log in from the window manager's login screen. </div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<p>well, It may be hard to hit a $35 price tag with that (like with a PI)</p>
<p>and it will even be harder to follow up on the low TCO in terms of energy use of the pi...</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3545518</link><pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 13:53:40 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3545518</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3545518@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 Suggestion 
  
 1. buy one of those elcheapo computer cases w/ power supply. 
 2. buy cheapest motherboard/processor you can find and put 1G of RAM into
it. 
 3. Buy a 16G flash drive. Install the Linux Version Of Choice onto the flash
drive which you will -- in the process -- make ***bootable***. 
 4. Write a custom web page containing all the links that your kids use. 
 5. Configure your favorite window manager (on the flash drive) automatically
start IceWeasel and use the custom web page as the home/start page. 
 6. Teach the kids how to log in from the window manager's login screen. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3545012</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:39:53 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3545012</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3545012@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>the cubox is one of the very few on that list of embedded computers that contain a SATA port.</p>
<p>One of the others are the qubie boards introduced by Tom Qubie.</p>
<p>However the Qubieboard is a lot closer to the pi then the cubox by price tag;</p>
<p>But it has the connectors all around it, which makes it harder to add it into a pre existing housing which would prefer to have all on one side.</p>
<p>Another sbc of that sort just came through in the lxer-room:</p>
<p>http://linuxgizmos.com/pico-itx-sbc-runs-linux-and-android-on-ti-sitara/ <br />(no mention of the price tag yet though...)</p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3544030</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 20:20:57 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3544030</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3544030@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[<html><body>

<p>makes sense.</p>
<p>My kids had a computer that they use exclusively for watching videos and playing online sesame street/nick Jr games. They fried the laptop we were using (poured water into it)</p>
<p>Need to replace it. We still have kb, mouse, and monitor. </p>
<p>Needs a hard disk, but precious little processing power beyond playing videos.</p>
<p>Be nice to get them a $45 box and an external hard disk that I can also use for my computer's backups. </p>
<p> </p>
</body></html>
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3543997</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 16:46:15 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3543997</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3543997@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[  
 I suspect that if Google would make it possible and easy to add an external
keyboard and monitor to the Nexus 7 you'd have your wish almost instantly.

  
 You could most likely do that now using a combination of firewire and their
somwhat proprietary USB 'port thingee' but I've not actually tried it and
won't speculate as to its (possible) efficacy. 
]]></description></item><item><link>http://uncensored.citadel.org/readfwd?go=Hardware?start_reading_at=3543798</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 11:59:03 -0000</pubDate><title>Message #3543798</title><guid isPermaLink="false">3543798@Uncensored</guid><description><![CDATA[Nice bit of computing power there.  As I keep pointing out -- this type of
thing ought to be built in to every new monitor sold, and perhaps the cost
of the chips will continue coming down to the point where such a thing is
economically a no-brainer.  When you can plug a keyboard and mouse into your
$150 flatscreen monitor, and get onto the Internet (and run hosted applications)
without buying a computer... 
  
 ...or when the OS on the computer is hosed and you need to get some work
done in a pinch 
  
 ...or when the computer is just plain broken 
  
 ...or when it's someone else's computer and you don't want to mess with it

  
 ...when every flatscreen monitor *is* a thin client 
  
 Eventually you're going to get to the point where the only people with a
"real computer" are the ones who are running compute-heavy software. 
  
 We need to get there. 
]]></description></item></channel></rss>

